The systematic review by DeVera et al. 1 found that poor adherence to statin pharmacotherapy increases cardiovascular events, but gave no consideration to the possibility that poor compliance may be due to side effects. Statin side effects have been under-estimated in recent studies, which do not include statin intolerant patients. However, more than 50% of patients discontinue statin therapy 1 and side effects are likely to be the main reason for doing so. Independent audit 2 and earlier randomized clinical trials show that side effects are relatively common and include fatigue, myopathy, liver dysfunction, cerebral haemorrhage, subtle cognitive impairment, neuropathy, renal failure, diabetes mellitus and cataracts. Side effects are dose related 2–4, often appear before cardiovascular benefits are obtained 4,5, impair quality of life, but are difficult to model and weigh against the benefits of pharmacotherapy 6. Insofar as side effects impede compliance, cardiovascular events may increase 1.
Highly significant reductions in mortality and around 25% reduction in total cardiovascular events were seen with just 20-40 mg of simvastatin in landmark earlier trials (4S 7 and the Heart Protection Study, HPS 8). This is about three-fold the dose required to lower low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol by 50% of maximum, the ‘effective dose (ED)50’, which in a comprehensive meta-analysis of statins and doses 5 is about 12 mg for simvastatin. By comparison, the mean statin dose prescribed in a recent large Japanese audit 9 was equivalent to about 24 mg simvastatin or 6 mg of atorvastatin daily 5, very similar to the statin doses used in 4S 7 and HPS 8. This may prove to be the effective standard defined daily dose (DDD) for statins, but higher doses may be indicated in high risk patients, lower doses in smaller, elderly patients or those with liver impairment or side effects.
Commonly promoted higher doses of the newer more potent statins, such as 80 mg atorvastatin 3 are over 25-fold the ED50, do not reduce mortality 3,4 and side effects can be markedly increased 2–4, liver dysfunction up to six-fold 3. Given the lifelong requirement for therapy, side effects are likely to compromise compliance. Closer attention to smoking, weight and blood pressure reduction is likely to reduce cardiovascular risk more effectively and safely. We suggest that lower statin dosing is very effective and may improve outcomes because reduced side effects will increase statin adherence.
Competing Interests
The authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org.coi_discolosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
- 1.De Vera MA, Bhole V, Burns LC, Lacaille D. Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78:684–98. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: a population based cohort study using the QResearch database. BMJ. 2010;340:c2197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart J-C, Gotto AM, Greten H, Kastelein JJP, Shepherd J, Wenger NK. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Armitage J, Bowman L, Wallendszus K, Bulbulia R, Rahimi K, Haynes R, Parish S, Peto R, Collins R. Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12 064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1658–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60310-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Law MR, Wald NJ, Rudnicka AR. Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326:1423–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Warren JB, Day S, Feldschrelber P. Symmetrical analysis of risk–benefit. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74:757–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04265.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Berg K, Haghfelt T, Faergeman O, Thorgeirsson G, Pyorala K, Miettinen T, Wilhelmsen L, Olsson AG, Wedel H. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Lancet. 1994;344:1383–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2004.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleight P, Peto R. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chang C-H, Kusama M, Ono S, Sugiyama Y, Orii T, Akazawa M. Assessment of statin-associated muscle toxicity in Japan: a cohort study conducted using claims database and laboratory information. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
