Abstract
Introduction:
Progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) is a chronic autoimmune illness. Clinical oral manifestations in Scleroderma are very frequent.
Aim:
To explore the oral manifestations, frequent and rare, to investigate whether there are differences between gender and the observed correlation of changes in relation to Antibodies Anti-Topoisomerase I.
Material and methods:
in the study were included 75 patients (65 females and 10 males), their mean age was 45.2±10, duration of illness was around 5.1±12 years diagnosed according to the ACR criteria and treated in the period 2010-2013.
Results:
98.7% of our patients were ANA positive, whereas 49.3% of them were Anti SCL-70 positive. Patients in 91% of cases had one or more oral manifestations of disease. The most frequent oral manifestations are: small mouth (n = 39), the lingua short frenulum (n = 21), Xerostomia (n = 24) and paradontopathia (n = 16), while more rare are: Telangiectasia (n = 14), decreased interincisal distance (n = 9), missing teeth (n = 9), absorption of dental alveoli (n = 5) and Neuralgia n. trigeminus (n = 3). Oral symptoms have been frequent in patients with Scleroderma, SCL -70 positive but not statistically significant difference.
Conclusions:
Oral changes have high frequency in patients with Scleroderma and these changes provide high discomfort of the mouth and lower quality of life. Oral health care to patients with Scleroderma is very important and it affects a lot in reducing the level of disease and increase the quality of life.
Keywords: Progressive systemic sclerosis, Oral manifestations, Small mouth and Anti SCL-70
1. INTRODUCTION
Progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) is a chronic autoimmune illness which is characterized with three major manifestations:
-
♦
Process of fibrosis in the skin and internal organs,
-
♦
Non-inflammatory vasculopathy of small blood vessels, and
-
♦
Specific autoantibodies which are not pathogenic, but are in correlation with activity of illness (1, 2).
In a PSS, a typical patient has developed Reynaud phenomenon, skin edema and sclerosis in the hands, face, trunk, lungs are affected with subsequent pulmonary hypertension and cardiomyopathy, heart and kidneys are affected which result in renal hypertensive crisis. These clinical manifestations might present as sole symptoms or combined together (3).
Clinical manifestations in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are very frequent manifestations after cutaneous manifestations which are the most frequent ones, and often attention is not paid to the latter, because cutaneous manifestations are not perceived as manifestations per se, even though have direct impact in the quality of life of patients (4). Damages in GIT are present among large number of patients with PSS, but it is still unknown why certain parts of digestive tube are more affected in comparison to the other parts (5, 6). However, certain clinical manifestations in the GIT are so frequent that are considered as dominant manifestations of PSS (Oral and esophagus changes) (7). Changes caused by PSS span from mouth to anus. Changes in the mouth are in the shape of microstomia which is caused due to skin fibrosis on the face that gives the look of “the bird’s face” which is one of the most distinctive features of patients with PSS (8). Other changes on the mouth are shortening of tongue frenulum, changes on the gum and uvula, fibrosis of salivary glands associated with dry mouth (syndrome sicca secondary) – biopsy here reveals negative results in contrast to Syndrome sicca primary where the biopsy reveals positive results. Other changes in the mouth are: Telangiectasia, Decreased interincisal distance, missing teeth, absorption of dental alveoli and Neuralgia n. trigeminus. So far is not known whether this changes cause higher incidence from malignancies (9, 10). Histological changes are result of fibrotic process in lamina propria, submucosa layer, and muscular layer. Actually each portion of digestive system which contains smooth muscle can be attacked by PSS (11, 12). Beside fibrotic changes, also perivascular deposits of inflammatory cells can be observed with subsequent ulcerations, excoriations and strictures in mouth and digestive tube which diminish the passage (13). There is no specific treatment for oral changes in Scleroderma, but changes should be treated along with general treatment of PSS. This therapeutic treatment is not to cure the Scleroderma disease but are measures that greatly improve the patient’s quality of life and should always apply (14). Specific antibodies anti Topoisomerase I, antibodies that are frequently used for the diagnosis of Scleroderma and its activity (15).
2. AIM AND OBJECTIVE
The research aims to find common oral manifestations and rare, to note that there are differences between the patients’ gender and noticed the correlation of these changes in relation to antibodies against topoisomerase I.
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS
Our study is prospective, and based on descriptive, research and analytical method we have explored PSS oral manifestations among patients who were diagnosed with PSS based on the revised ACR criteria from 2010 to 2013 (16). In all patients are required Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) and antibodies against Topoisomerase I (Anti SCL-70.) 75 patients: 65 patients were females, respectively 10 males, with median age 45.2 ± 10.1 Patients were with active illness ranging from 1.5-8 years, with a median of 5.1±12 years, whereas the illness has been evaluated in accordance with EUSTAR criteria (European Scleroderma Trial and Research) (17).
Evaluation score regarding affection with systemic sclerosis is done in accordance with EUSTAR as well: affection of cardiovascular system is scored with 2 points, skin – 2 points, erythrocyte sedimentation >30 in the first hour -1.5 points, Rodman’s modified cutaneous test > 20 – 1 point, decrease of value of complement – 1 point, distal necrosis of hand fingers – 0.5 points, and DLCO (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide) lower than 80%–1 point. Patients are all residents of Kosovo and in the study are not included 7 patients diagnosed with PSS who were not residents of Kosovo. All patients were informed and have provided consent to be part of our study. During the examination of patients with SSP is marked each clinical manifestation of mouth, for each was conducted X-ray and CT and special cases was also conducted consultations with Maxillofacial Surgeon Specialist or Oral Surgeon.
The research has calculated the following statistical parameters: frequency, median age, and Chi-Square test, correlation of oral clinical manifestations and anti-Topoisomerase I.
Electronic inquiry of search engine Google and in Pub-med didn’t yield data on similar research conducted in Kosovo and Balkan Peninsula.
4. RESULTS
In clinical research laboratory and radiological, clinical oral manifestations of patients with PSS have found: of 75 patients with PSS, 91% had one or more clinical manifestations oral.
Table 1.
The presence of antibodies in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis

Most frequent clinical manifestation on the mouth was small mouth (microstomia) found in 52.0% of patients, followed by dry mouth 32.0%, shorter frenulum linguae 28.0% and parodontopathy in 21.3% of patients. The following symptoms were most frequently seen in males in comparison to females, but with no significant statistical difference (P>0.05), (Table 2).
Table 2.
Oral manifestations more frequent in patients with Scleroderma

Table 3.
Oral manifestations more rare in patients with Scleroderma

Rare oral manifestations are presented more men than women.
Oral symptoms are more frequent among patients positive to SCL -70, but in X2-test we didn’t found any significant correlation (P>0.05), (Table 4).
Table 4.
Clinical symptoms in mouth among patients with scleroderma and Anti SCL-70

5. DISCUSSION
Our patients with PSS underwent examination related to oral clinical manifestation. 91% of patients were having one or more oral manifestations of PSS.. There are numerous researches which were dealing with oral manifestations of PSS. Canadian authors in their paper The Canadian Oral Health systemic sclerosis study III have analyzed 163 patients; 90% were female, mean age 56 ± 11 years, disease duration 14 ± 8 years and their results were: Sjogren’s syndrome, decreased interincisal distance, missing teeth and paradontopathia (17).
Results from our study are almost identical with the findings from the working of Canadian authors. Marmary author has researched Scleroderma oral manifestations in 41 patients and found that reduced mouth opening, mandibular condyle damaging, and coronoid process are the most frequent damages of Scleroderma (18). In other research Robert E Wodd analyzed 31 female patients with progressive systemic sclerosis and findings for: Xerostomia, erosion of the mandible and paradontopathy are similar to the results from our study (19). In research: Analysis of the oral manifestations of systemic sclerosis is researched group of 32 patients with Scleroderma and other research except analyzed dry mouth where our results are very close to their results (20). Author Scardina in their publication: Early diagnosis of progressive systemic sclerosis: the role of orofacial phenomena analyzed 34 patients; Women were 30, males were 4, and findings that Xerostomia, reduced mouth opening and Neuralgia n. trigeminus are the most common damages (21). Vincent C with co-author in his research with 30 patients found that: telangiectasia perioral, reduced opening the mouth, xerostomia, mandibular absorption, Neuralgia n. trigeminus are the most common injuries. Our results are identical with its findings except Telangiectasia which we presented our research on low frequency (we youngest patients and shorter the duration of the disease) (22). Author Michaels Van Amelsfort found data matches the data from the research our reduced opening, mouth and dental disturbance (23). Study published in 2003 in the journal Arthritis and Rheumatism stated that level of anti-topoisomerase I (anti SCL – 70) has a positive correlation with the activity of illness in the PSS (15).
6. CONCLUSION
-
♦
In the research were included 75 patients – 65 females and 10 males.
-
♦
Median age of patients was (45.2±10.1), while duration of illness was 5 years.
-
♦
Our patients with PSS in 98.7% of cases were ANA positive, whereas anti SCL – 70 were positive 49.3% of cases.
-
♦
Patients in 91% of cases had one or more oral manifestations of disease.
-
♦
Most frequent oral manifestations of patients with PSS are: small mouth, frenulum short lingua, dry mouth and Paradontopatia.
-
♦
Rare oral manifestations are: Telangiectasia, decreased interincisal distance, missing teeth, alveolar absorption and Neuralgia n. trigeminus.
-
♦
Presence of oral manifestations symptoms didn’t give significant difference between genders.
-
♦
Oral manifestations are present more often in patients who were positive in the Anti SCL-70 but no statistical difference singnificant.
-
♦
Additional scientific research needed to certify the reasons why oral pathology does not affect equally all patients with Progressive Systemic Sclerosis.
-
♦
Oral manifestations are due to discomfort in the mouth and reduce the quality of life.
-
♦
Oral health care for patients with PSS is very important because it affects a lot in reducing the overall morbitidetit of this disease and improves quality of life.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS: NONE DECLARED.
REFERENCES
- 1.Megan C MacNeil, Mauren D Mayes. Assesing disease activity and outcome in scleroderma p.1369. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblat ME, Weisman MH, editors. Rheumatology. fourthy edition. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bolster MB, Silver RM. Clinical features of systemic sclerosis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblat ME, Weisman MH, editors. Rheumatology. fourthy edition. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. pp. 1375–1385. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Richard A.Wats, Philip Conghan, Cris Denton, Helen Foster, John Issacs, Ulf Muller-Ladner. Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology. 2013 Dec 30; [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clements PJ, Becvar R, Drosos AA, et al. Assessment of gastrointestinal involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21:S15–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nietert PJ. Correlates of depression, including overall and gastrointestinal status, among patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumathol. 2005;32:51–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Recht MP, et al. Barret’s esophagus in scleroderma increased prevalence and radiographic findings. Gastrointestinal Radiol. 1988;13:1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF01889012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anič B, Sustavna skleroza. Vrhovac B, Jakŝič B, Reiner Z, Vucelič B, editors. Interna Medicina 4 izdanje, Zagreb Naklada Ljevak. 2006:1390–1392. in Croatian. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Albilia JB, Lam DK, Mlanas N, Clokie CM, Sandor GK. Small mouths…Big problems?A review of scleroderma and its oral health implications. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:831–836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davidson A, Russel C, Littlejohn GO. Assessment of esophageal abnormalities in progressive systemic sclerosis using radionukleotid transit. J Rheumatol. 1985;12:472–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Young MA, Rose S, Reynolds JC. Gastroinestinal manifestation of scleroderma. Rheuma Dis Clin North Am. 1996;22:797–823. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70302-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dalle I, Geboes K. Vascular lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2002 Oct-Dec;65(4):213–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lidia Vera-Lastra O. Systemic sclerosis and the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Reumatol Clin. 2006 Nov;2S3:S24–30. doi: 10.1016/S1699-258X(06)73104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuana M, Okazaki Y, Yasuoka HY, et al. Defective vasculogenesis in systemic sclerosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9434):603–610. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16853-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Denton CP, Black CM. Menegement of systemic sclerosis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblat ME, Weisman MH, editors. Rheumatology. fourthy edition. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. pp. 1415–1430. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paul Q. Hu, Noreen Fertig, Thomas A. Medsger, Jr, Timothy M Wright. Correlation of serum Anti AND Topoisomera I antibodies Level with disease severity and activity in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2003;5:1363–1373. doi: 10.1002/art.10977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Subcommittee for Scleroderma Criteria of the American Rheumatism Assiciation Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee: Preleminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:581–590. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baron M, Hudson M, Tatibouet S, Steele R, Lo E, Gravel S, Gyger G, El Sayegh T, Pope J, Fontaine A, Masetto A, Matthews D, Sutton E, Thie N, Jones N, Copete M, Kolbinson D, Markland J, Nogueira G, Robinson D, Fritzler M, Gornitsky M. The Canadian Systemic Sclerosis Oral Health Study III: Relationship between disease characteristics and oro-facial manifestations in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014 Oct 9; doi: 10.1002/acr.22490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marmary Y, Glaiss R, Pisanty S. Scleroderma: oral manifestations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 Jul;52(1):32–37. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90169-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Robert E Wood, Peter Lee. Analysis of the oral manifeststions of Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma) Oral Syrgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Phatology. 1988;65(2):172–178. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(88)90161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagy G1, Kovács J, Zeher M, Czirják L. Analysis of the oral manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994 Feb;77(2):141–146. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90276-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scardina GA1, Mazzullo M, Messina P. Early diagnosis of progressive systemic sclerosis: the role of oro-facial phenomena. Minerva Stomatol. 2002 Jul-Aug;51(7-8):311–317. Article in Italian. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vincent C1, Agard C, Barbarot S, N’guyen JM, Planchon B, Durant C, Pistorius MA, Dreno B, Ponge T, Stalder JF, Mercier JM, Hamidou M. Orofacial manifestations of systemic sclerosis: A study of 30 consecutive patients. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2010 Jun;111(3):128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2010.04.001. Article in French. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Michels-van Amelsfort JM1, Brand HS, van Laar JM. Oral manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2013 Sep;120(9) doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2013.09.13179. Article in Dutch. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
