Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Endocrinol. 2013 May 8;168(6):R95–103. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0115

Notch Signaling In Skeletal Health and Disease

Stefano Zanotti 1,2, Ernesto Canalis 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4501254  NIHMSID: NIHMS690328  PMID: 23554451

Abstract

Notch receptors are single-pass transmembrane proteins that determine cell fate. Upon Notch-ligand interactions, proteolytic cleavages release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) which translocates to the nucleus to regulate the transcription of target genes, including Hairy enhancer of split (Hes) and Hes-related with YRPW-motif (Hey). Notch is critical for skeletal development and activity of skeletal cells, and dysregulation of Notch signaling is associated with human diseases affecting the skeleton. Inherited or sporadic mutations in components of the Notch signaling pathway are associated with spondylocostal and spondylothoracic dysostoses, and recessive brachydactyly, diseases characterized by skeletal patterning defects. Inactivating mutations of the Notch ligand JAG1 or of NOTCH2 are associated with Alagille syndrome, and activating mutations in NOTCH2 are associated with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Individuals affected by Hajdu-Cheney syndrome exhibit osteolysis in distal phalanges, and osteoporosis. NOTCH is activated in selected tumors, such as osteosarcoma, and in breast cancer cells that form osteolytic bone metastases. In conclusion, Notch regulates skeletal development and bone remodeling, and gain- or loss-of-function mutations of Notch signaling result in important skeletal diseases.

Keywords: Notch, Skeleton, Bone remodeling, Alagille syndrome, Hajdu-Cheney syndrome

Skeletal Cells and Bone Remodeling

Skeletal tissue arises from distinct developmental processes. Cells of the cranial neural crest form the bones of the craniofacial skeleton, whereas the axial skeleton develops from somites (1,2). Hyaline cartilage templates of appendicular bones originate from the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation cells residing in the limb bud. Chondrocytes in hyaline cartilage proliferate and acquire a hypertrophic phenotype, deposit a mineralized matrix, and ultimately become apoptotic. These events result in the formation of a calcified cartilage scaffold, which is vascularized and subsequently colonized by skeletal cell precursors that will replace cartilage with bone (3). Osteoblasts derive from mesenchymal cells that reside in the bone marrow, and are the bone forming cells, which can differentiate further into lining cells or into osteocytes, or can die by apoptosis (4,5,6). Osteocytes are terminally differentiated cells embedded in the mineralized matrix (7,8). Osteoclasts, multinucleated cells that arise from the fusion of mononuclear precursors of the hematopoietic lineage, are the bone resorbing cells. Their formation requires Receptor activator of nuclear factor k-B ligand (RANKL) (9) and Macrophage colony stimulating factor, whereas osteoprotegerin is a soluble inhibitor of RANKL. Therefore, the balance of RANKL and osteoprotegerin regulates osteoclastogenesis (9). Osteoblasts and osteoclasts play a critical role in the modeling of the growing skeleton, and the coupled function of these cells controls the remodeling of skeletal tissue throughout life (10).

The differentiation and function of cells of the osteoblastic and osteoclastic lineages are regulated by systemic and local signals, and the balance of their activities is essential to maintain bone remodeling. Notch has emerged recently as a local signal that plays a critical role in skeletal development, osteoblastic cell fate and function and osteoclastogenesis (11). Consequently, it is not a surprise that gain- and loss-of-function mutations of various components of the Notch signaling pathway result in a variety of skeletal disorders. Furthermore, alterations in Notch signaling have been associated with selected malignancies and their skeletal metastatic potential (12).

Notch Signaling in Skeletal Development and Bone Remodeling

Notch are a family of four (Notch 1 to 4) transmembrane receptors activated by Notch ligand interactions (11,13,14,15). Classical or canonical Notch ligands are the single-pass membrane proteins Jagged1 and 2 and Delta-like (DII) 1, 3 and 4. Following Notch proteases, ligand binding, the g-secretase complex, containing the Presenilin1 and Presenilin2 cleaves the transmembrane domain of Notch, allowing the release and ultimate nuclear translocation of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD). In the nucleus, NICD interacts with the DNA-binding protein CSL (for C promoter-binding factor 1, Suppressor of Hairless and Lag1), also known as Rbpjk. This leads to the formation of the transcriptional complex formed by NICD, CSL/Rbpjk, and Mastermind-like (Maml), and the subsequent displacement of transcriptional repressors and the induction of Notch target genes (Figure 1) (15). Hairy enhancer of split (Hes), and Hes-related with YRPW-motif (Hey) are classic targets of Notch signaling (14). The C-terminus of Notch contains a proline (P)-, glutamic acid (E)-, serine (S)-, threonine (T)-rich (PEST) domain, which is necessary for the ubiquitinylation and subsequent degradation of the Notch protein in the proteasome, ensuring proper duration of the Notch signal (15,13).

Figure 1. Activation of Notch signaling.

Figure 1

In panel A, Notch receptors and Jagged/Delta ligands are expressed as single-pass transmembrane proteins. Epstein-Barr virus latency C promoter-binding factor 1, Suppressor of hairless, Lag1 (CSL), also termed Rbpjk, is bound to DNA and inhibits gene expression by recruiting transcriptional repressors. In panel B, receptor-ligand interactions lead to the cleavage of the Notch receptor mediated by Presenilin, and release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) to the cytoplasm. In panel C, NICD translocates to the nucleus and forms a ternary complex with CSL and Mastermind-Like (MAML), replacing transcriptional repressors with transcriptional activators, and inducing expression of Notch target genes, such as Hairy enhancer of split (Hes), and Hes-related with YRPW-motif (Hey).

Notch signaling determines the segmentation of the axial skeleton during somitogenesis (16,17), and its induction in the limb bud suppresses chondrogenesis, an effect that appears to be mediated by Hes1 (18,19,20,21). The role played by Notch in mature chondrocytes is less clear (22,23,24,25). Notch signaling regulates osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function, and as a consequence controls bone remodeling. The effects of Notch in cells of the osteoblastic lineage are cell-context dependent and determined by the degree of differentiation of the cells targeted by Notch. Notch suppresses progression to a mature osteoblastic phenotype, and osteoblast function, when expressed during the early stages of the osteoblastic differentiation program, leading to suppressed bone formation and bone loss (19,26,27,28,29). Notch inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption by inducing osteoprotegerin expression in osteoblasts (30,26). Accordingly, NICD overexpression in mature osteoblasts and osteocytes increases trabecular bone mass due to suppressed osteoclast formation and bone resorption (29). Most of the studies reported have examined the function of Notch1, so that less is known regarding the function of Notch2, 3 and 4 in the skeleton. There is evidence that Notch1 and 2 have distinct activities. For example, activation of Notch1 in osteoclast precursors prevents their differentiation toward mature osteoclasts, whereas activation of Notch2 enhances osteoclastogenesis (31,32).

A. Developmental Skeletal Diseases Associated with Notch Signaling

Dysostoses of the Axial Skeleton

Spondylocostal dysostosis and spondylothoracic dysostosis are forms of trunk dwarfism caused by congenital abnormalities of the vertebrae and ribs secondary to defective somitogenesis (Table 1). Mutations of the various components of the Notch signaling pathway are associated with the diseases, and autosomal recessive inheritance is observed most frequently, although cases of autosomal dominant transmission have been reported (33,34,35). The phenotypes of Dll3 null mice recapitulate the manifestations of spondylocostal dysostosis, and mutations in DLL3, leading to the translation of a truncated or misfolded protein of this Notch ligand are found in humans affected by the disease (36,37,38,39). Mesoderm posterior (Mesp)2 is a Notch target gene, which encodes a transcription factor critical for somitogenesis, and Mesp2 null mice exhibit vertebral defects (40,17). Accordingly, individuals that display abnormal segmentation of the thoracic vertebrae, typical of spondylocostal dysostosis, harbor homozygous nonsense mutations of MESP2 (41). Similarly, spondylothoracic dysostosis, which is observed mostly in people of Puerto Rican descent, is associated with a mutant MESP2 allele (42). Hes7 regulates the transcription of lunatic fringe (Lfng) which, by regulating the glycosylation of Notch, changes the affinity of Notch receptors for its ligands (43). Inactivation of Lfng or Hes7 in mice leads to abnormal development of the rib cage and vertebral column, and mutations in LFNG and HES7 are associated with spondylocostal dysostosis in humans (44,45,46,47,48,49).

Table 1. Skeletal Diseases Associated with Notch Mutations.

Disease Mutated Gene Major Manifestations Possibly Impaired Notch Function
Spondylocostal dysostoses DLL3, MESP2, HES7, LNF Dwarfism
Vertebral developmental defects
Regulation of the segmentation clock during somitogenesis
Spondylothoracic dysostoses MESP2 Dwarfism
Vertebral developmental defects
Brachydactyly CHYS1 Short digits
Stunted growth
Patterning of the digits during development.
Alagille Syndrome* JAG1, NOTCH2 Facial dismorphism
Vertebral abnormalities
Bile duct atresia
Cardiovascular defects
Craniofacial development; regulation of the segmentation clock during somitogenesis; vascular development.
Hajdu Cheney Syndrome* NOTCH2 Acro-osteolysis
Osteoporosis
Fibular deformities
Polycystic kidneys
Suppression of osteoclastogenesis; limb and kidney development.

Abbreviations: DLL3, Delta-like 3; MESP2, Mesoderm Posterior 2; HES7, Hairy and Enhancer of Split 7; LNF, Lunatic Fringe; CHSY1, Chondroitin Sulfate Synthase 1; JAG1, Jagged 1.

*

Additional details outlined in Tables 2 and 3.

Brachydactyly

Brachydactyly is characterized by shortening of the digits of the hands and feet (50). In mice, the global inactivation of the Notch ligand Jag2 causes digit abnormalities and defects of the craniofacial skeleton that lead to perinatal death, indicating that perturbations of Notch signaling result in developmental defects that are reminiscent of brachydactyly (51,52). A null allele of chondroitin sulfate synthase (CHSY)1 was discovered in members of a Jordanian family diagnosed with a syndromic form of brachydactyly that presented with stunted growth, micrognatia, and learning disabilities. CHSY1 encodes a transmembrane protein containing a fringe domain, and cultured fibroblasts from affected individuals exhibited Notch activation secondary to upregulation of the ligand encoded by JAG1. Recombinant CHSY1 inhibited Notch signaling in vitro, indicating that excessive activation of Notch signaling is responsible for the disease (53). Chsy1 null mice display abnormalities in digit patterning, although the phenotype appears to be secondary to dysregulation of Indian hedgehog and transforming growth factor β, and not of Notch signaling (54).

Alagille Syndrome

Alagille syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease that presents with cardiovascular defects, abnormalities of the craniofacial skeleton and vertebral column, cholestatic liver disease due to impaired formation of bile ducts, and renal anomalies, including dysplasia (Table 2) (55). In individuals affected by Alagille syndrome, vertebrae fail to fuse ventrally during development and assume a characteristic “butterfly” appearance in radiographic images (56). Osteoporosis possibly secondary to liver failure and malnutrition has been reported in patients with the disease. Alagille syndrome is associated with mutations of JAG1, and these are mostly de novo mutations that lead to the translation of a truncated JAGGED1 protein, although complete gene deletions and missense mutations are also observed (57,58,59). Rarely, mutations of NOTCH2 have been found to be associated with Alagille syndrome, either in isolation or in addition to mutations of JAG1 (60,61). Global Jag1 null mice die during development, and the dual heterozygous inactivation of Jag1 and Notch2 in mice recapitulates most of the defects found in Alagille syndrome, confirming that the disease is secondary to mutations of these genes (62). In addition, inactivation of Jag1 selectively in cells of the cranial neural crest phenocopies the abnormalities of the craniofacial skeleton that characterize Alagille syndrome, confirming its association with impaired Notch signaling (63).

Table 2. Features of Alagille Syndrome.

Craniofacial features Skeletal features Other features

Broad nasal bridge
Craniosynostosis
Deep set eyes
Micrognathia
Pointed chin
Prominent forehead
Triangular facies
Butterfly vertebrae
Digit abnormalities
Osteoporosis secondary to liver failure
Short stature
Bile duct atresia
Cholestatic liver failure
Cardiovascular defects, including Tetralogy of Fallot
Intracranial bleeding
Renal failure

B. Gain-of-Function Mutations of Notch Signaling

Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome

Hajdu-Cheney syndrome (HCS) is a devastating disease characterized by focal bone lysis of distal phalanges and by generalized osteoporosis (64,65,66,67,68). The disease was first described in 1948 in a 37 year old accountant who died 12 years later, and the syndrome was reported by Cheney in 1965 (Table 3) (65,64). HCS is transmitted as an autosomal dominant disease although many sporadic cases occur. Over 60 years after the original description, whole exome sequencing in individuals affected with HCS revealed the presence of point mutations in exon 34 of NOTCH2 leading to the creation of a stop codon and the premature termination of the protein product upstream the PEST domain (69,70,71). It is of interest that NOTCH2 transcript levels were equivalent to those observed in controls, indicating a reduced capacity to activate the process of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Since the PEST domain contains sequences necessary for the ubiquitinylation and degradation of Notch in the proteasome, the mutations lead to a stable protein and persistence of NOTCH2 signaling since all sequences required for the formation of the Notch transcriptional complex are upstream the PEST domain and are therefore preserved (Figure 2).

Table 3. Features of Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome.

Craniofacial features Skeletal features Other features

Facial dysmorphism
Microretrognathism
Periodontal disease
Platysbasia
Open sutures
Tooth loss
Wormian bones
Acro-osteolysis
Fibular deformities
Joint hyperlaxity
Osteoporosis with fractures
Short stature
Cardiovascular defects
Developmental delay
Hearing loss
Neurological symptoms
Polycystic kidneys

Figure 2. Structure of the NOTCH2 intracellular domain, and mutations associated with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome.

Figure 2

The intracellular domain of NOTCH2 (NICD) consists of a transcriptional domain formed by an Rbpjk association module (RAM) linked to ankyrin (ANK) repeats, and a nuclear localization sequence (NLS). The C-terminus contains the proline (P)-, glutamic acid (E)-, serine (S)-, and threonine (T)-rich motifs (PEST) domain which is required for the ubiquitinylation and degradation of the NICD. Nonsense mutations in exon 34 associated with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome (HCS) and pointed by the arrow lead to the formation of a truncated protein consisting of all NOTCH2 sequences necessary for the formation of the transcriptional complex, but lacking the PEST domain needed for the ubiquitinylation and degradation of NOTCH2. As such, a stable and active NOTCH2 protein is synthesized.

Despite the pronounced skeletal abnormalities reported in HCS, little is known regarding the mechanisms underlying the bone loss. Although the distal phalangeal osteolytic lesions would suggest increased localized bone resorption, there is no information on the mechanisms responsible for the generalized osteoporosis. The focal osteolysis is accompanied by neovascularization, inflammation and fibrosis (72,73,74). Iliac crest biopsies have been reported in a small number of cases of HCS and revealed decreased trabecular bone, normal or increased bone remodeling, and normal or decreased bone formation (73,75,76,77). Whether the osteoblast/osteocyte or the osteoclast is the cell responsible for the presumed change in bone turnover has not been established. In osteoclast precursors, Notch2 induces Nuclear factor of T-cells 1 transcription, and osteoclastogenesis (32). This effect is exclusively observed with Notch2 and not with Notch1, but whether this mechanism operates in HCS is not known.

Bisphosphonate therapy (alendronate and pamidronate) alone or in combination with anabolic therapy with teriparatide has been attempted for the treatment of the skeletal manifestations of patients with HCS, but there is no clear evidence that either therapy is beneficial (77,78,79). Serpentine fibula-polycystic kidney syndrome appears to be the same disease as Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, and missense mutations in exon 34 of NOTCH2, upstream of sequences encoding for the PEST domain, were detected in patients affected by this disease (80,68,81). Although HCS affects a limited number of individuals, discovering a cluster of mutations in a single domain of NOTCH2 in patients with HCS sheds light on potential mechanisms underpinning the development of osteoporosis. Multiple attempts to uncover genetic variants that contribute to the risk of osteoporosis have been relatively unsuccessful (82,83). However, bone mineral density and risk of osteoporotic fractures were associated with a select JAG1 allele in seven independent cohorts of woman of Asian and European descent (84).

C. Notch and Skeletal Malignancies

Malignancies arising from cells of the hematopoietic lineage, such as T-cell leukemia, can exhibit activating mutations of NOTCH1 and dysregulated Notch signaling, which may cause uncontrolled cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis (85). Human osteosarcoma cells exhibit greater expression of the Notch ligand JAG1, of NOTCH1, and of the Notch target gene HES1 than normal human osteoblasts, and the ability of osteosarcoma cells to metastasize correlates with increased Notch signaling (86,87). Tumor burden in mice inoculated with human osteosarcoma cell lines was alleviated when cells expressing a dominant negative form of MAML, which inhibits Notch signaling, were used, or when g-secretase inhibitors, to prevent Notch activation, were administered systemically (86). In addition, inhibition of g-secretase prevented the growth of human osteosarcoma cells implanted subcutaneously in immunodeficient mice, confirming that activation of Notch signaling plays a critical role in the development of osteosarcoma (88).

Co-culture of human bone marrow stromal cells with cells from carcinoma of the breast induces NOTCH3 expression in the tumor cells, although the mechanisms mediating the effect are not known (89). Carcinoma of the breast cells induce osteolytic bone metastases in immunodeficient mice, and downregulation of NOTCH3 opposes this effect, suggesting a role for NOTCH3 in tumor invasion (89). Expression of JAG1 in human breast cancer cells is associated with increased tumor burden and the ability of the tumor cells to metastasize to bone when implanted in immunodeficient mice. In this experimental model, JAG1 expressing tumor cells stimulated osteoblasts to secrete interleukin 6, which in turn induced the maturation of osteoclast precursors and the formation of osteolytic metastases. This led to the degradation of the extracellular matrix surrounding the lytic lesions, and the release of transforming growth factor β, which promoted JAG1 expression by tumor cells, creating a positive feedback loop favoring tumor invasion (90). In agreement with these findings, elevated expression of JAG2 was associated with reduced metastasis-free survival in three cohorts of breast cancer patients, suggesting that activation of Notch signaling confers breast cancer cells the ability to form bone metastases (91).

Osteoblastic cells regulate the hematopoietic stem cell niche and influence stem cell function through the activation of Notch (92). Although defective Notch activation can lead to a myeloproliferative disease in the mouse, hematological malignancies have been associated with the constitutive activation of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 in humans (93). Activating mutations of NOTCH1 leading to the expression of a truncated protein are present in over 50% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (94,95). Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia may present with osteopenia and vertebral fractures, and the prevalence of fractures in newly diagnosed children in ∼16% (96). Rarely, osteolytic lesions and hypercalcemia have been reported (97). Gain-of-function mutations of NOTCH2 were found in a subset of patients with large B-cell lymphoma, but their association with specific skeletal disorders is not known (98).

Conclusions

Genetic mutations causing either gain- or loss-of-function of various components of the Notch signaling pathway are associated with diverse skeletal disorders, and demonstrate that Notch is critical for human skeletal development and homeostasis. Findings in human diseases are consistent with results from numerous studies in mice, and selected vertebrate model organisms, confirming that Notch signaling regulates skeletogenesis. Gain-of-function mutations of Notch lead to bone loss, and this is in agreement with the inhibitory effects of Notch on osteoblastogenesis, and with the stimulatory action of Notch2 on osteoclastogenesis. Various modalities to control Notch signaling have been reported, including the use of antibodies to the Notch extracellular domain or to its ligands, and the use of cell membrane permeable peptides that interfere with the formation of the Notch transcriptional complex, such as soluble MAML peptides (99,100). However, reduced Notch signaling can result in the development of vascular tumors (101). There is strong evidence indicating that activation of NOTCH2 signaling causes Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, and NOTCH2 could be a potential target for the treatment this disease. However, for therapy to succeed it needs to inhibit NOTCH2 activity specifically in affected tissues. Induction of Notch signaling is a critical event in the development and invasiveness of osteosarcoma, and metastatic potential of carcinoma of the breast. Notch signaling could be targeted for the treatment of selected skeletal malignancies, but results from necessary clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of this approach are lacking. Targeting of Notch signaling in skeletal diseases associated with the loss of Notch activity would be even more problematic. Although strategies to activate Notch signaling were reported in a preclinical study, such approaches may result in serious complications due to the potential arrest of cell differentiation (102).

In conclusion, Notch signaling is required for skeletal development and bone homeostasis and gain- and loss-of-function mutations in genes that regulate the Notch signaling pathway are uncommon, but cause severe skeletal disorders.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant DK045227 (EC) from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases and by Research Fellowship 5371 from the Arthritis Foundation (SZ).

References

  • 1.Santagati F, Rijli FM. Cranial neural crest and the building of the vertebrate head. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:806–818. doi: 10.1038/nrn1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wellik DM. Hox patterning of the vertebrate axial skeleton. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:2454–2463. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W. Bone development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:191–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bianco P, Gehron RP. Marrow stromal stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1663–1668. doi: 10.1172/JCI10413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Canalis E. The fate of circulating osteoblasts. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2014–2016. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park D, Spencer JA, Koh BI, Kobayashi T, Fujisaki J, Clemens TL, Lin CP, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aarden EM, Burger EH, Nijweide PJ. Function of osteocytes in bone. J Cell Biochem. 1994;55:287–299. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bonewald LF. The amazing osteocyte. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:229–238. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they do it? Am J Pathol. 2007;170:427–435. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Canalis E, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP. Mechanisms of Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:905–916. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra067395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch and the Skeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:886–896. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01285-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch regulation of bone development and remodeling and related skeletal disorders. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;90:69–75. doi: 10.1007/s00223-011-9541-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fortini ME. Notch signaling: the core pathway and its posttranslational regulation. Dev Cell. 2009;16:633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2003;194:237–255. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kopan R, Ilagan MX. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell. 2009;137:216–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kageyama R, Masamizu Y, Niwa Y. Oscillator mechanism of Notch pathway in the segmentation clock. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:1403–1409. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saga Y. The mechanism of somite formation in mice. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012;22:331–338. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Francis JC, Radtke F, Logan MP. Notch1 signals through Jagged2 to regulate apoptosis in the apical ectodermal ridge of the developing limb bud. Dev Dyn. 2005;234:1006–1015. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hilton MJ, Tu X, Wu X, Bai S, Zhao H, Kobayashi T, Kronenberg HM, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP, Kopan R, Long F. Notch signaling maintains bone marrow mesenchymal progenitors by suppressing osteoblast differentiation. Nat Med. 2008;14:306–314. doi: 10.1038/nm1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dong Y, Jesse AM, Kohn A, Gunnell LM, Honjo T, Zuscik MJ, O'Keefe RJ, Hilton MJ. RBPjkappa-dependent Notch signaling regulates mesenchymal progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation during skeletal development. Development. 2010;137:1461–1471. doi: 10.1242/dev.042911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zanotti S, Smerdel-Ramoya A, Canalis E. Hairy and enhancer of split (HES)1 is a determinant of bone mass. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:2648–2657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.183038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mead TJ, Yutzey KE. Notch pathway regulation of chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation during appendicular and axial skeleton development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14420–14425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902306106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kohn A, Dong Y, Mirando AJ, Jesse AM, Honjo T, Zuscik MJ, O'Keefe RJ, Hilton MJ. Cartilage-specific RBPjkappa-dependent and -independent Notch signals regulate cartilage and bone development. Development. 2012;139:1198–1212. doi: 10.1242/dev.070649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen S, Tao J, Bae Y, Jiang MM, Bertin T, Chen Y, Yang T, Lee B. Notch gain of function inhibits chondrocyte differentiation via Rbpj-dependent suppression of Sox9. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch suppresses nuclear factor of activated T cells (Nfat) transactivation and Nfatc1 expression in chondrocytes. Endocrinology. 2013;154:762–772. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Engin F, Yao Z, Yang T, Zhou G, Bertin T, Jiang MM, Chen Y, Wang L, Zheng H, Sutton RE, Boyce BF, Lee B. Dimorphic effects of Notch signaling in bone homeostasis. Nat Med. 2008;14:299–305. doi: 10.1038/nm1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zanotti S, Smerdel-Ramoya A, Stadmeyer L, Durant D, Radtke F, Canalis E. Notch Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation And Causes Osteopenia. Endocrinology. 2008;149:3890–3899. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tao J, Chen S, Yang T, Dawson B, Munivez E, Bertin T, Lee B. Osteosclerosis owing to Notch gain of function is solely Rbpj-dependent. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:2175–2183. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Canalis E, Parker K, Feng JQ, Zanotti S. Osteoblast Lineage-specific Effects of Notch Activation in the Skeleton. Endocrinology. 2013;154:623–634. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamada T, Yamazaki H, Yamane T, Yoshino M, Okuyama H, Tsuneto M, Kurino T, Hayashi S, Sakano S. Regulation of osteoclast development by Notch signaling directed to osteoclast precursors and through stromal cells. Blood. 2003;101:2227–2234. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bai S, Kopan R, Zou W, Hilton MJ, Ong CT, Long F, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. NOTCH1 regulates osteoclastogenesis directly in osteoclast precursors and indirectly via osteoblast lineage cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6509–6518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707000200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fukushima H, Nakao A, Okamoto F, Shin M, Kajiya H, Sakano S, Bigas A, Jimi E, Okabe K. The association of Notch2 and NF-kappaB accelerates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:6402–6412. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00299-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gridley T. Notch signaling and inherited disease syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:R9–13. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Turnpenny PD, Alman B, Cornier AS, Giampietro PF, Offiah A, Tassy O, Pourquie O, Kusumi K, Dunwoodie S. Abnormal vertebral segmentation and the notch signaling pathway in man. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:1456–1474. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gucev ZS, Tasic V, Pop-Jordanova N, Sparrow DB, Dunwoodie SL, Ellard S, Young E, Turnpenny PD. Autosomal dominant spondylocostal dysostosis in three generations of a Macedonian family: Negative mutation analysis of DLL3, MESP2, HES7, and LFNG. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A:1456–1474. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kusumi K, Sun ES, Kerrebrock AW, Bronson RT, Chi DC, Bulotsky MS, Spencer JB, Birren BW, Frankel WN, Lander ES. The mouse pudgy mutation disrupts Delta homologue Dll3 and initiation of early somite boundaries. Nat Genet. 1998;19:274–278. doi: 10.1038/961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bulman MP, Kusumi K, Frayling TM, McKeown C, Garrett C, Lander ES, Krumlauf R, Hattersley AT, Ellard S, Turnpenny PD. Mutations in the human delta homologue, DLL3, cause axial skeletal defects in spondylocostal dysostosis. Nat Genet. 2000;24:438–441. doi: 10.1038/74307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dunwoodie SL, Clements M, Sparrow DB, Sa X, Conlon RA, Beddington RS. Axial skeletal defects caused by mutation in the spondylocostal dysplasia/pudgy gene Dll3 are associated with disruption of the segmentation clock within the presomitic mesoderm. Development. 2002;129:1795–1806. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.7.1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang CH, Lin WD, Bau DT, Chou IC, Tsai FJ. Genetic and clinical profiles of spondylocostal dysostosis patients in Taiwan. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:3132–3135. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saga Y, Hata N, Koseki H, Taketo MM. Mesp2: a novel mouse gene expressed in the presegmented mesoderm and essential for segmentation initiation. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1827–1839. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.14.1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Whittock NV, Sparrow DB, Wouters MA, Sillence D, Ellard S, Dunwoodie SL, Turnpenny PD. Mutated MESP2 causes spondylocostal dysostosis in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1249–1254. doi: 10.1086/421053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cornier AS, Staehling-Hampton K, Delventhal KM, Saga Y, Caubet JF, Sasaki N, Ellard S, Young E, Ramirez N, Carlo SE, Torres J, Emans JB, Turnpenny PD, Pourquie O. Mutations in the MESP2 gene cause spondylothoracic dysostosis/Jarcho-Levin syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:1334–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stanley P. Regulation of Notch signaling by glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007;17:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bessho Y, Sakata R, Komatsu S, Shiota K, Yamada S, Kageyama R. Dynamic expression and essential functions of Hes7 in somite segmentation. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2642–2647. doi: 10.1101/gad.930601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Okubo Y, Sugawara T, Abe-Koduka N, Kanno J, Kimura A, Saga Y. Lfng regulates the synchronized oscillation of the mouse segmentation clock via trans-repression of Notch signalling. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1141. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sparrow DB, Chapman G, Wouters MA, Whittock NV, Ellard S, Fatkin D, Turnpenny PD, Kusumi K, Sillence D, Dunwoodie SL. Mutation of the LUNATIC FRINGE gene in humans causes spondylocostal dysostosis with a severe vertebral phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:28–37. doi: 10.1086/498879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sparrow DB, Guillen-Navarro E, Fatkin D, Dunwoodie SL. Mutation of Hairy-and-Enhancer-of-Split-7 in humans causes spondylocostal dysostosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:3761–3766. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dunwoodie SL. Mutation of the fucose-specific beta1,3 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase LFNG results in abnormal formation of the spine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792:100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sparrow DB, Sillence D, Wouters MA, Turnpenny PD, Dunwoodie SL. Two novel missense mutations in HAIRY-AND-ENHANCER-OF-SPLIT-7 in a family with spondylocostal dysostosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:674–679. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Temtamy SA, Aglan MS. Brachydactyly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:15. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sidow A, Bulotsky MS, Kerrebrock AW, Bronson RT, Daly MJ, Reeve MP, Hawkins TL, Birren BW, Jaenisch R, Lander ES. Serrate2 is disrupted in the mouse limb-development mutant syndactylism. Nature. 1997;389:722–725. doi: 10.1038/39587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jiang R, Lan Y, Chapman HD, Shawber C, Norton CR, Serreze DV, Weinmaster G, Gridley T. Defects in limb, craniofacial, and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1046–1057. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.7.1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tian J, Ling L, Shboul M, Lee H, O'Connor B, Merriman B, Nelson SF, Cool S, Ababneh OH, Al-Hadidy A, Masri A, Hamamy H, Reversade B. Loss of CHSY1, a secreted FRINGE enzyme, causes syndromic brachydactyly in humans via increased NOTCH signaling. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;363:413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wilson DG, Phamluong K, Lin WY, Barck K, Carano RA, Diehl L, Peterson AS, Martin F, Solloway MJ. Chondroitin sulfate synthase 1 (Chsy1) is required for bone development and digit patterning. Dev Biol. 2012;363:413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Alagille D, Estrada A, Hadchouel M, Gautier M, Odievre M, Dommergues JP. Syndromic paucity of interlobular bile ducts (Alagille syndrome or arteriohepatic dysplasia): review of 80 cases. J Pediatr. 1987;110:195–200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Emerick KM, Rand EB, Goldmuntz E, Krantz ID, Spinner NB, Piccoli DA. Features of Alagille syndrome in 92 patients: frequency and relation to prognosis. Hepatology. 1999;29:822–829. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Crosnier C, Driancourt C, Raynaud N, Dhorne-Pollet S, Pollet N, Bernard O, Hadchouel M, Meunier-Rotival M. Mutations in JAGGED1 gene are predominantly sporadic in Alagille syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1141–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Morrissette JD, Colliton RP, Spinner NB. Defective intracellular transport and processing of JAG1 missense mutations in Alagille syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:405–413. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.4.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bauer RC, Laney AO, Smith R, Gerfen J, Morrissette JJ, Woyciechowski S, Garbarini J, Loomes KM, Krantz ID, Urban Z, Gelb BD, Goldmuntz E, Spinner NB. Jagged1 (JAG1) mutations in patients with tetralogy of Fallot or pulmonic stenosis. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:594–601. doi: 10.1002/humu.21231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McDaniell R, Warthen DM, Sanchez-Lara PA, Pai A, Krantz ID, Piccoli DA, Spinner NB. NOTCH2 mutations cause Alagille syndrome, a heterogeneous disorder of the notch signaling pathway. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:169–173. doi: 10.1086/505332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kamath BM, Bauer RC, Loomes KM, Chao G, Gerfen J, Hutchinson A, Hardikar W, Hirschfield G, Jara P, Krantz ID, Lapunzina P, Leonard L, Ling S, Ng VL, Hoang PL, Piccoli DA, Spinner NB. NOTCH2 mutations in Alagille syndrome. J Med Genet. 2012;49:138–144. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.McCright B, Lozier J, Gridley T. A mouse model of Alagille syndrome: Notch2 as a genetic modifier of Jag1 haploinsufficiency. Development. 2002;129:1075–1082. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.4.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Humphreys R, Zheng W, Prince LS, Qu X, Brown C, Loomes K, Huppert SS, Baldwin S, Goudy S. Cranial neural crest ablation of Jagged1 recapitulates the craniofacial phenotype of Alagille syndrome patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:1374–1383. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hajdu N, Kauntze R. Cranio-skeletal dysplasia. Br J Radiol. 1948;21:42–48. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-21-241-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cheney WD. Acro-Osteolysis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1965;94:595–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Silverman FN, Dorst JP, Hajdu N. Acroosteolysis (Hajdu-Cheney syndrome) Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1974;10:106–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Currarino G. Hajdu-Cheney syndrome associated with serpentine fibulae and polycystic kidney disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:47–52. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-0992-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gray MJ, Kim CA, Bertola DR, Arantes PR, Stewart H, Simpson MA, Irving MD, Robertson SP. Serpentine fibula polycystic kidney syndrome is part of the phenotypic spectrum of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:122–124. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Isidor B, Lindenbaum P, Pichon O, Bezieau S, Dina C, Jacquemont S, Martin-Coignard D, Thauvin-Robinet C, Le MM, Mandel JL, David A, Faivre L, Cormier-Daire V, Redon R, Le CC. Truncating mutations in the last exon of NOTCH2 cause a rare skeletal disorder with osteoporosis. Nat Genet. 2011;43:306–308. doi: 10.1038/ng.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Simpson MA, Irving MD, Asilmaz E, Gray MJ, Dafou D, Elmslie FV, Mansour S, Holder SE, Brain CE, Burton BK, Kim KH, Pauli RM, Aftimos S, Stewart H, Kim CA, Holder-Espinasse M, Robertson SP, Drake WM, Trembath RC. Mutations in NOTCH2 cause Hajdu-Cheney syndrome, a disorder of severe and progressive bone loss. Nat Genet. 2011;43:303–305. doi: 10.1038/ng.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Majewski J, Schwartzentruber JA, Caqueret A, Patry L, Marcadier J, Fryns JP, Boycott KM, Ste-Marie LG, McKiernan FE, Marik I, Van EH, Michaud JL, Samuels ME. Mutations in NOTCH2 in families with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:1114–1117. doi: 10.1002/humu.21546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nunziata V, di GG, Ballanti P, Bonucci E. High turnover osteoporosis in acro-osteolysis (Hajdu-Cheney syndrome) J Endocrinol Invest. 1990;13:251–255. doi: 10.1007/BF03349553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Udell J, Schumacher HR, Jr, Kaplan F, Fallon MD. Idiopathic familial acroosteolysis: histomorphometric study of bone and literature review of the Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1032–1038. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Elias AN, Pinals RS, Anderson HC, Gould LV, Streeten DH. Hereditary osteodysplasia with acro-osteolysis. (The Hajdu-Cheney syndrome) Am J Med. 1978;65:627–636. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90851-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Blumenauer BT, Cranney AB, Goldstein R. Acro-osteolysis and osteoporosis as manifestations of the Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20:574–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Brown DM, Bradford DS, Gorlin RJ, Desnick RJ, Langer LO, Jowsey J, Sauk JJ. The acro-osteolysis syndrome: Morphologic and biochemical studies. J Pediatr. 1976;88:573–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(76)80009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Avela K, Valanne L, Helenius I, Makitie O. Hajdu-Cheney syndrome with severe dural ectasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:595–598. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McKiernan FE. Integrated anti-remodeling and anabolic therapy for the osteoporosis of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome: 2-year follow-up. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:379–380. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0461-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Galli-Tsinopoulou A, Kyrgios I, Giza S, Giannopoulou EM, Maggana I, Laliotis N. Two-year cyclic infusion of pamidronate improves bone mass density and eliminates risk of fractures in a girl with osteoporosis due to Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Minerva Endocrinol. 2012;37:283–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Isidor B, Le MM, Exner GU, Pichon O, Thierry G, Guiochon-Mantel A, David A, Cormier-Daire V, Le CC. Serpentine fibula-polycystic kidney syndrome caused by truncating mutations in NOTCH2. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:1239–1242. doi: 10.1002/humu.21563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Majewski F, Enders H, Ranke MB, Voit T. Serpentine fibula--polycystic kidney syndrome and Melnick-Needles syndrome are different disorders. Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152:916–921. doi: 10.1007/BF01957530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fisher E. A step forward on the path towards understanding osteoporosis. Clin Genet. 2011;80:136–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Richards JB, Kavvoura FK, Rivadeneira F, Styrkarsdottir U, Estrada K, Halldorsson BV, Hsu YH, Zillikens MC, Wilson SG, Mullin BH, Amin N, Aulchenko YS, Cupples LA, Deloukas P, Demissie S, Hofman A, Kong A, Karasik D, van Meurs JB, Oostra BA, Pols HA, Sigurdsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Soranzo N, Williams FM, Zhou Y, Ralston SH, Thorleifsson G, Van Duijn CM, Kiel DP, Stefansson K, Uitterlinden AG, Ioannidis JP, Spector TD. Collaborative meta-analysis: associations of 150 candidate genes with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:528–537. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kung AW, Xiao SM, Cherny S, Li GH, Gao Y, Tso G, Lau KS, Luk KD, Liu JM, Cui B, Zhang MJ, Zhang ZL, He JW, Yue H, Xia WB, Luo LM, He SL, Kiel DP, Karasik D, Hsu YH, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Styrkarsdottir U, Halldorsson BV, Sigurdsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K, Richards JB, Zhai G, Soranzo N, Valdes A, Spector TD, Sham PC. Association of JAG1 with bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures: a genome-wide association study and follow-up replication studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Leong KG, Karsan A. Recent insights into the role of Notch signaling in tumorigenesis. Blood. 2006;107:2223–2233. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Engin F, Bertin T, Ma O, Jiang MM, Wang L, Sutton RE, Donehower LA, Lee B. Notch signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of human osteosarcomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1464–1470. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhang P, Yang Y, Zweidler-McKay PA, Hughes DP. Critical role of notch signaling in osteosarcoma invasion and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2962–2969. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 88.Kolb EA, Gorlick R, Keir ST, Maris JM, Lock R, Carol H, Kurmasheva RT, Reynolds CP, Kang MH, Wu J, Houghton PJ, Smith MA. Initial testing (stage 1) by the pediatric preclinical testing program of RO4929097, a gamma-secretase inhibitor targeting notch signaling. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:815–818. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhang Z, Wang H, Ikeda S, Fahey F, Bielenberg D, Smits P, Hauschka PV. Notch3 in human breast cancer cell lines regulates osteoblast-cancer cell interactions and osteolytic bone metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1459–1469. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sethi N, Dai X, Winter CG, Kang Y. Tumor-derived JAGGED1 promotes osteolytic bone metastasis of breast cancer by engaging notch signaling in bone cells. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xing F, Okuda H, Watabe M, Kobayashi A, Pai SK, Liu W, Pandey PR, Fukuda K, Hirota S, Sugai T, Wakabayshi G, Koeda K, Kashiwaba M, Suzuki K, Chiba T, Endo M, Mo YY, Watabe K. Hypoxia-induced Jagged2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells. Oncogene. 2011;30:4075–4086. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, Weber JM, Olson DP, Knight MC, Martin RP, Schipani E, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR, Milner LA, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kim YW, Koo BK, Jeong HW, Yoon MJ, Song R, Shin J, Jeong DC, Kim SH, Kong YY. Defective Notch activation in microenvironment leads to myeloproliferative disease. Blood. 2008;112:4628–4638. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-148999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Van VP, Ferrando A. The molecular basis of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3398–3406. doi: 10.1172/JCI61269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JP, Silverman LB, Sanchez-Irizarry C, Blacklow SC, Look AT, Aster JC. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science. 2004;306:269–271. doi: 10.1126/science.1102160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Halton J, Gaboury I, Grant R, Alos N, Cummings EA, Matzinger M, Shenouda N, Lentle B, Abish S, Atkinson S, Cairney E, Dix D, Israels S, Stephure D, Wilson B, Hay J, Moher D, Rauch F, Siminoski K, Ward LM. Advanced vertebral fracture among newly diagnosed children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the Canadian Steroid-Associated Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population (STOPP) research program. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:1326–1334. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Soni PN. Hypercalcaemia and multiple osteolytic lesions in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Postgrad Med J. 1993;69:483–485. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.812.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lee SY, Kumano K, Nakazaki K, Sanada M, Matsumoto A, Yamamoto G, Nannya Y, Suzuki R, Ota S, Ota Y, Izutsu K, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Hangaishi A, Yagita H, Fukayama M, Seto M, Kurokawa M, Ogawa S, Chiba S. Gain-of-function mutations and copy number increases of Notch2 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:920–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01130.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Moellering RE, Cornejo M, Davis TN, Del BC, Aster JC, Blacklow SC, Kung AL, Gilliland DG, Verdine GL, Bradner JE. Direct inhibition of the NOTCH transcription factor complex. Nature. 2009;462:182–188. doi: 10.1038/nature08543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ryeom SW. The cautionary tale of side effects of chronic Notch1 inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:508–509. doi: 10.1172/JCI45976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Liu Z, Turkoz A, Jackson EN, Corbo JC, Engelbach JA, Garbow JR, Piwnica-Worms DR, Kopan R. Notch1 loss of heterozygosity causes vascular tumors and lethal hemorrhage in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:800–808. doi: 10.1172/JCI43114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kannan S, Sutphin RM, Hall MG, Golfman LS, Fang W, Nolo RM, Akers LJ, Hammitt RA, McMurray JS, Kornblau SM, Melnick AM, Figueroa ME, Zweidler-McKay PA. Notch activation inhibits AML growth and survival: a potential therapeutic approach. J Exp Med. 2013 doi: 10.1084/jem.20121527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES