Correction: Physiological Trade-Offs Along a Fast-Slow Lifestyle Continuum in Fishes: What Do They Tell Us about Resistance and Resilience to Hypoxia?

Table 1 has been corrected for improved readability. The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see the corrected Table 1 here.

Table 1. Summary of the hypotheses tested (in bold) in this study, using three species of freshwater fish with differing lifestyles: Mogurnda adspersa, Hypseleotris sp., and Melanotaenia fluviatilis.

Species(lifestyle)	Behaviour and habitat	Metabolism	Resistance to hypoxia	Resilience to hypoxia
M. adspersa(slow)	Benthic sit-and-wait predator	Low SMR and RMR. Low MMR. AS (?)	High; Low P crit ; High RC; High RM	Low; Low Ucrit; Low U opt ; High COT gross ; High COT opt
Hypseleotris(intermediate)	Benthopelagic	Intermediate SMR and RMR. Intermediate MMR. AS (?)	Medium; Medium P crit ; Medium RC; Medium RM	Medium; Medium U crit ; Medium U opt ; MediumCOT gross; Medium COT opt
M. fluviatilis(fast)	Pelagic cruising predator	High SMR and RMR. High MMR. AS (?)	Low; High P crit ; Low RC; Low RM	High; High U crit ; High U opt ; Low COT gross ; Low COT opt

SMR, RMR, MMR and AS refer to standard, routine and maximum metabolic rate, and aerobic scope respectively. P_crit is critical oxygen tension. Two metabolic reduction variables were measured: (1) ‘Reduction Capacity’ (RC), the logarithm of the ratio of two areas (ln(A_r/A_e)), where A_r is the area between either SMR or RMR and the depressed metabolic rate curves, during gradual hypoxia, and A_e is excess post-hypoxic oxygen consumption; (2) RM, the magnitude of metabolic reduction as measured by the percentage of SMR depressed during hypoxia. U _crit and U _opt are, respectively, the critical and optimal swimming speeds. COT_gross and COT_opt are the gross and optimal energetic costs of transport, respectively. Values of SMR and RMR for these three species have already been determined by Dwyer et al. [63], which is why they are not hypotheses tested here. MMR may be linked to lifestyle [26], and so it is included in the set of hypotheses towards improving understanding of how lifestyle affects performance along the FSLC. Interspecific variance in AS is a topic of great current debate and so is included in the analysis, but how its magnitude links with lifestyle isn’t clear [26].