Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jul 16;3(4):e00741-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00741-15

Complete Genome Sequences of Four Novel Escherichia coli Bacteriophages Belonging to New Phage Groups

Alexander B Carstens a,b, Witold Kot a,b, Lars H Hansen a,
PMCID: PMC4505120  PMID: 26184932

Abstract

Here, we describe the sequencing and genome annotations of a set of four Escherichia coli bacteriophages (phages) belonging to newly discovered groups previously consisting of only a single phage and thus expand our knowledge of these phage groups.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Since Félix d’Hérelle’s discovery of the bacteriophage in 1917 (1), much effort has been put into understanding phages and their diversity (2, 3). This is especially true for phages of classic laboratory strains of Escherichia coli (2). Nonetheless, even with almost a hundred years of studies, the diversity of E. coli phages is not fully explored (3). Here, we present the complete sequences of four novel E. coli phages belonging to two newly discovered bacteriophage groups. This will extend our knowledge of the sequence diversity of E. coli phages.

The four phages were isolated from animal fecal samples on E. coli strain MG1655. The DNA isolation and library preparation was done using direct plaque sequencing as described before (4), with the minor modification that SDS was used in a final concentration of 0.1%. The library was sequenced using Illumina paired-end sequencing on the MiSeq platform as a part of a flowcell (250 cycles; Illumina). The total read yield was between 49,884 (CAjan) and 182,112 (JenP2) reads per library. Reads were trimmed and de novo assembled using CLC Genomic Workbench version 7.0.4 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). The assembly was cross-verified by SPAdes Genome Assembler version 3.1.0 (5).

Three regions with relatively low coverage in CAjan’s genome were confirmed by PCR, followed by Sanger sequencing reactions (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). Automated annotation and open reading frame identification was performed using the RAST annotation server (6). This was followed by manual verification by screening all the predicted proteins against the NCBI protein database using BLASTp (7) and by using a Pfam domain search (8). CAjan, JenP1, JenP2 and JenK1 are all double-stranded DNA phages with genome sizes of 59,670, 607,454, 59,802, and 60,747 bp, respectively. The four phages have a G/C content between 43.2% (JenP2) and 44.7% (CAjan) with an average coverage in the assembly between 114.7-fold (CAjan) and 542.79-fold (JenP2). The genomes contain between 88 (JenK1) and 91 (CAjan) predicted genes, the majority of which could not be assigned a function. All four phages contain an operon with genes involved in queuosine biosynthesis, as has been seen in other phages (9). The function of queuosine is not completely understood but might be involved in the specificity of transcription and codon recognition (10) and might help the phage hijack the host transcription and translation machinery.

JenP1, JenP2, and JenK1 are closely related to enterobacterium phage 9g (GenBank accession number NC_024146), sharing 93%, 90%, and 96% sequence identity, respectively. Enterobacterium phage 9g was, until now, considered the sole representative of a novel phage genus (11). At the time of assembly CAjan had no close relatives, but a new Escherichia phage “Seurat” sharing 96% sequence identity with CAjan has recently been published (12). Seurat also belongs to a novel group of phages with no other close relatives. The four sequenced phages JenP1, JenP2, JenK1, and CAjan therefore expand the two phage groups and bring new insights to the diversity of E. coli phages.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Genome sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KP064094 (CAjan), KP719132 (JenP1), KP719133 (JenP2), and KP719134 (JenK1).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Lundbeck grant R44-A4384 and a PHAGEMID project financed by the Danish Research Council for Technology and Production (4093-00198).

Footnotes

Citation Carstens AB, Kot W, Hansen LH. 2015. Complete genome sequences of four novel Escherichia coli bacteriophages belonging to new phage groups. Genome Announc 3(4):e00741-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00741-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.D’Herelle F. 1917. On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: brief note by Mr F D’Herelle, presented by Mr Roux. 1917. Res Microbiol 158:553–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Campbell A. 2003. The future of bacteriophage biology. Nat Rev Genet 4:471–477. doi: 10.1038/nrg1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ackermann HW. 2011. Bacteriophage taxonomy. Microbiol Aust 32:90–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kot W, Vogensen FK, Sørensen SJ, Hansen LH. 2014. DPS—a rapid method for genome sequencing of DNA-containing bacteriophages directly from a single plaque. J Virol Methods 196:152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D290–D301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sabri M, Häuser R, Ouellette M, Liu J, Dehbi M, Moeck G, García E, Titz B, Uetz P, Moineau S. 2011. Genome annotation and intraviral interactome for the Streptococcus pneumoniae virulent phage Dp-1. J Bacteriol 193:551–562. doi: 10.1128/JB.01117-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vinayak M, Pathak C. 2010. Queuosine modification of tRNA: its divergent role in cellular machinery. Biosci Rep 30:135–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kulikov EE, Golomidova AK, Letarova MA, Kostryukova ES, Zelenin AS, Prokhorov NS, Letarov AV. 2014. Genomic sequencing and biological characteristics of a novel Escherichia coli bacteriophage 9g, a putative representative of a new Siphoviridae genus. Viruses 6:5077–5092. doi: 10.3390/v6125077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doan DP, Lessor LE, Hernandez AC, Kuty Everett GF. 2015. Complete genome sequence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli siphophage Seurat. Genome Announc 3(1):e00044-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00044-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES