Background: c-Abl tyrosine kinase and serine/threonine kinase HIPK2 are activated by DNA damage and promote apoptosis.
Results: c-Abl phosphorylated HIPK2, and this enabled HIPK2 accumulation and phosphorylation of p53 in response to γ- and UV radiation.
Conclusion: HIPK2 response to DNA damage depends on c-Abl kinase activity.
Significance: This work demonstrates a new role for c-Abl in regulating p53 apoptotic response.
Keywords: ABL tyrosine kinase, DNA damage response, Hippo pathway, p53, serine/threonine protein kinase, high cell density, homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2), tyrosine kinase and serine/threonine kinase crosstalk
Abstract
The non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl is activated in response to DNA damage and induces p73-dependent apoptosis. Here, we investigated c-Abl regulation of the homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2), an important regulator of p53-dependent apoptosis. c-Abl phosphorylated HIPK2 at several sites, and phosphorylation by c-Abl protected HIPK2 from degradation mediated by the ubiquitin E3 ligase Siah-1. c-Abl and HIPK2 synergized in activating p53 on apoptotic promoters in a reporter assay, and c-Abl was required for endogenous HIPK2 accumulation and phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 in response to DNA damage by γ- and UV radiation. Accumulation of HIPK2 in nuclear speckles and association with promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) in response to DNA damage were also dependent on c-Abl activity. At high cell density, the Hippo pathway inhibits DNA damage-induced c-Abl activation. Under this condition, DNA damage-induced HIPK2 accumulation, phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46, and apoptosis were attenuated. These data demonstrate a new mechanism for the induction of DNA damage-induced apoptosis by c-Abl and illustrate network interactions between serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases that dictate cell fate.
Introduction
The cellular DNA damage response comprises mechanisms to repair DNA, as well as pathways that lead to senescence or apoptosis, depending on the level of damage and internal and external cellular conditions. The p53 tumor suppressor is a central effector of the DNA damage response, and it is guided to trigger varied responses through its post-translational modifications. Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 following DNA damage is associated with preferential induction of a pro-apoptotic program through specific association of phospho-Ser46 p53 with promoters of pro-apoptotic genes (1, 2) as well as facilitating the p53 direct mitochondrial apoptotic program (3). Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 also promotes the association of p53 with Pin1, which in turn mediates the dissociation of p53 from the inhibitor of apoptosis stimulating protein of p53 (iASPP) (4) and promotes Pin1-mediated activation of the mitochondrial death program of p53 (5).
Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2)2 is a serine/threonine kinase that primes p53-mediated apoptosis. In response to DNA damage by genotoxic agents such as ionizing and UV radiation, HIPK2 accumulates and phosphorylates p53 at Ser46, thereby inducing apoptosis both by increasing transcription of pro-apoptotic genes and through an increase in the p53 direct mitochondrial apoptotic program (3, 5–9). Upon activation, HIPK2 autophosphorylates on serine/threonine as well as on tyrosine residues. Autophosphorylation at Ser357 and Tyr354 is necessary for HIPK2 kinase activity, binding to substrates and to Pin1 (10, 11). HIPK2 also autophosphorylates upon DNA damage at Thr880/Ser882, and these modifications are involved in HIPK2 interaction with Pin1 (12). HIPK2 localization to PML nuclear bodies in the nucleus aids in its activation, escape from degradation mediated by E3 ubiquitin ligases, and activation of p53 (6, 13, 14). Phosphorylation of HIPK2 by Src causes HIPK2 to localize to the cytoplasm, preventing its activation of p53 (15). In unstressed cells, HIPK2 is maintained at a low level through ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Several E3 ubiquitin ligases, including Siah-1 and -2 (16, 17), WSB-1 (18), Mdm2 (19), and SCF(Fbx3) (14), are responsible for promoting this degradation, which is inhibited upon genotoxic stress. Degradation of HIPK2 by Siah-1 is inhibited by phosphorylation of Siah-1 by ATM and ATR upon DNA damage (16). Interaction of HIPK2 with Pin1 or phosphorylation by Src also reduces HIPK2 interaction with Siah-1 and polyubiquitination (12, 15).
The non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl is activated upon DNA damage and promotes apoptosis through the Yap-p73 pathway (20, 21). Phosphorylation of Yap by c-Abl causes Yap to preferentially associate with p73 at apoptotic gene targets, instead of cell cycle arrest targets (21), and to associate with p73 rather than with other transcription factors such as Runx (22). Thus, c-Abl supports the p73 pro-apoptotic DNA damage response. Targeted activation of the c-Abl/Yap-p73 pathway has recently been demonstrated to be a powerful mechanism for cancer cell killing (23). c-Abl also promotes p53-dependent DNA damage-induced apoptosis indirectly through modulation of upstream regulators such as Mdm2, ATM/ATR, and p38 MAPK (24–26). c-Abl activates p73 through direct phosphorylation (20, 27), but c-Abl does not directly phosphorylate p53 (28). HIPK2 possesses several consensus sites for c-Abl phosphorylation (YXXP), suggesting a possibility of direct phosphorylation and regulation of HIPK2 by c-Abl.
Cellular environments influence DNA damage response. The Hippo pathway, activated by cell crowding, inhibits DNA damage-induced apoptosis mediated by c-Abl (29). This occurs through inhibition of c-Abl by the Hippo pathway kinase Lats2. Thus, Hippo inhibits apoptosis mediated by Yap/p73. However, high cell density also inhibits DNA damage-induced apoptosis in cells with wild-type p53. It was shown that cell crowding reduces p53 apoptotic activity in response to genotoxic stress (30). However, the mechanism for inhibition of p53-dependent apoptosis at high cell density remained unknown.
Our results show that c-Abl activity was required for the accumulation and activity of HIPK2 in response to γ- and UV radiation and synergized with HIPK2 in the activation of pro-apoptotic p53 target genes. c-Abl phosphorylated HIPK2 on several sites, and c-Abl prevented degradation of HIPK2 mediated by the ubiquitin E3 ligase Siah-1. Lats2 inhibited c-Abl phosphorylation of HIPK2, and HIPK2 accumulation and phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 were inhibited at high cell density. These findings demonstrate a new link between the tyrosine kinase c-Abl and the serine/threonine kinase HIPK2 in promoting DNA damage-induced apoptosis and help to explain how apoptosis is inhibited at high cell density.
Experimental Procedures
Cells and Cell Culture
The cell lines used were human embryonic kidney cells HEK 293 and HEK 293T, HepG2, and Hep3B cells. Cells were grown in DMEM (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, Thermo Scientific) supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and cultured at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5.0% CO2. Plating densities are defined as <40% confluent for “sparse” and confluent for “dense.” Unless otherwise specified, cells were plated under sparse conditions. After plating, cells were allowed to attach for at least 16 h before treatment (such as irradiation) or harvesting. Light microscopy photographs of cells were performed using an Olympus (Tokyo, Japan) IX70 microscope connected to a DVC camera.
Plasmids, Transfection, Transduction, and mRNA Analysis
The plasmids used were: pCDNA3 c-Abl Δ1–81 and K290H (kinase-dead) (29). Full-length c-Abl constructs were the 1b isoform, and numbering of c-Abl residues refers to the positions in the 1b isoform. pSG5 c-Abl WT and ΔSH3 were described (20). The pSG5 c-Abl 1–730 and 1–1044 mutants were made by cleaving the wild-type clone with BamHI and either AfeI or EheI, respectively, and ligating along with a blunt-BamHI linker containing stop codons. Human pCDNA3 FLAG-HIPK2 full-length, K221A (kinase-dead), truncation, and GFP-fused constructs and HA-Siah-1 constructs have been previously described (16). mRFP-PML IV was described in Ref. 31. FLAG-HIPK2 constructs in the pCDNA3 vector backbone were also transferred to the pEFIRES vector (32). FLAG-HIPK2 constructs were also transferred to the pTriEx expression vector (Novagen, Merck Millipore), for bacterial expression of N-terminally His-tagged proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis, confirmed by sequencing, was used to create point mutations described in the text. Mdm2 (33), pRc/CMV p53, FLAG-p53, and Myc-Lats2 constructs (34) were provided by M. Oren and Y. Aylon. For stable knocking down of c-Abl, HEK 293T cells were transfected with the mission pLKO.1 shRNA vectors targeting c-Abl or GFP or harboring a non-targeting sequence (Sigma) together with pLP1, pLP2, and pLP-VSVG packaging plasmids (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Thermo Scientific). 48 h hours after transfection, viral supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm filter, supplemented with 8 μg/ml Polybrene, and used to infect Hep3B or HepG2. 24 h after infection, cells were selected with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma) or 5 μg/ml blasticidin (Calbiochem (Merck Millipore)) in the culture medium. To generate Hep3B cells stably expressing p53, retrovirus infection was performed by transfecting 293 Phoenix retrovirus packaging cells with p53 expression vector or the respective empty vector. Transduction of Hep3B with retrovirus particles was performed using the same protocol as described above for the lentiviral vectors. All transfections of HEK293 and HEK293T cells were done by the calcium phosphate method as described (35). JetPEI® (Polyplus Transfection SA, Illkirch, France) was used to transfect Hep3B cells. Total RNA was extracted using the TRI Reagent solution (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH), DNase-treated using the RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and then reverse-transcribed by iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with SYBR® Green PCR master mix (Kapa Biosystems, Woburn, MA) using the LightCycler® 480 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).
GST Pulldown Assay
GST fusion proteins were expressed in the Escherichia coli BL21 strain and purified using GSH-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare). GST-HIPK2 (1–520) and GST-HIPK2 (551–1191) fusion proteins were incubated with 35S-labeled c-Abl generated by in vitro translation using the TnT coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, reticulocyte lysates were incubated with bead-bound GST fusion proteins in AM200 buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 200 mm KCl, 5 mm MgCl2, 0.1 mm EDTA, 0.5 mm EGTA, 10% glycerol, 0.05% Nonidet P-40) for 2 h at 4 °C. Afterward the beads were washed three times using AM200 buffer. Finally the proteins were eluted using 1× Laemmli buffer. GST pulldowns were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. 10% input was loaded as input control. Total amounts of proteins were analyzed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.
In Vitro Kinase Assays
In vitro kinase assays were performed as described (29), with some modifications. HEK293 cells were transfected with c-Abl constructs. Proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-c-Abl K12 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) with protein A/G-Sepharose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitates were washed four times with lysis buffer and then twice with kinase buffer (50 mm Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mm MgCl2, 1 mm EGTA, 2 mm DTT, and 0.01% Brij 35). For the assay, bacterially expressed and purified recombinant proteins or control were added to the tubes containing the immunoprecipitated c-Abl (not eluted from the beads). BSA was added to 200 μg/ml, and ATP was added to 200 μm. Reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. The reactions were centrifuged, and the supernatant (assay mix) and pellets (containing c-Abl) were analyzed separately by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Immunoblot and Coimmunoprecipitation Studies
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitations (IPs) were done as described previously (35). Affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal anti-HIPK2 antibodies, (batches 88a, C1, and rb1) were previously described (16). All batches were raised against the same peptide antigen, and all batches detected endogenous HIPK2. There were some differences in cross-reacting bands among the different batches. Other antibodies used were: anti-HA, monoclonal anti-β-tubulin, anti-β-actin, and anti-FLAG M5 (Sigma); anti-c-Abl K12, anti-c-Abl 8E9, and anti-general phosphotyrosine (phospho-Tyr (PY20), Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-cleaved caspase-3, anti-phospho-Ser46 p53 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA). The anti-c-Abl K12 antibody was used for c-Abl detection, unless otherwise specified. Monoclonal anti-p53 DO-1 antibodies were a generous gift from C. Prives. Anti-Myc monoclonal antibodies were generated by the Antibody Laboratory of the Weizmann Institute. For IP of HA- and FLAG-tagged proteins, anti-FLAG M2-agarose and anti-HA-agarose (Sigma) were used. For other IPs, protein A/G-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA. Enhanced chemiluminescence was performed with the EZ-ECL kit (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel), and signals were detected by the ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare) or by exposure to film. Intensities of bands were quantified by the ImageQuant TL software. For comparison of multiple experiments, values within one experiment were normalized to a standard set at 1. Error bars represent S.E.
Immunofluorescence Staining
Cells were seeded on glass coverslips and UV-irradiated the next day, and 24 h following irradiation, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with 0.5% (v/v) Triton-X-100 for 25 min, and blocked with 10% BSA and 0.2% Tween 20. Cells were incubated with either rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-p53 (Ser46) antibody (Cell Signaling) or rabbit polyclonal anti-c-Abl antibody (Santa Cruz) and mouse monoclonal anti-p53 hybridoma medium (DO-1) followed by the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit or Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibodies (Molecular probes). Slides were mounted with DAPI-containing Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech). Images were acquired using Zeiss LSM 710 confocal scanning system using a 60×/1.4 NA oil objective and processed by Zen 2009 software (Zeiss).
γ-Ray and UV Irradiation
Cells were subjected to γ-irradiation in a Millennium 870LC irradiator with a 137Cs source (Mainance International Ltd., Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK). Cells were subjected to UV-C irradiation using a Stratagene UV Stratalinker 1800 (La Jolla, CA).
Reporter Gene Assays
HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing the tested constructs along with a promoter-containing firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, and a Renilla luciferase-expressing plasmid as a transfection control. 24 h after transfection, cell lysates were analyzed for luciferase activity in the Modulus microplate multimode reader (Turner Biosystems), and differences in transfection efficiency were corrected for by normalizing the firefly luciferase activity to that of Renilla luciferase.
Imaging Flow Cytometry
HEK293T cells were transfected with GFP-HIPK2 and H2B-RFP or mRFP-PML IV. 24 h after transfection, cells were treated with STI571 (20 μm) for 2 h and then subjected to UV irradiation (50J/m2). 3 days after irradiation, cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS and run on the ImageStream X flow cytometer (Amnis Corp., Seattle, WA). Data were acquired using the INSPIRE software (Amnis Corp). At least 1000 GFP+ and RFP+ cells were imaged. To have an entire cell in optimal focus, the extended depth of field option was used (36). Data were deconvolved and analyzed by the IDEAS 6.0 software (Amnis Corp.). Cells were gated for single cells using the area and aspect ratio of the brightfield image and gated for focused cells using the gradient RMS feature (36). Nuclear mask was created according to H2B-RFP or staining with DRAQ5, which is confined to the nucleus. The number of individual spots within the nuclear mask was measured by using the Spot Count feature on the “Peak” mask.
Results
c-Abl Phosphorylates HIPK2
There are five putative consensus c-Abl phosphorylation sites (YXXP) in HIPK2, two in the kinase domain, and three at the C terminus (Fig. 1A). In addition, HIPK2 autophosphorylates at Tyr354 (10, 11). To determine whether c-Abl has a role in phosphorylation of HIPK2 in response to DNA damage, we analyzed phosphorylation of HIPK2 in the presence or absence of the c-Abl inhibitor STI571 (Gleevec, imatinib). Our results indicated that irradiation increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of the endogenous HIPK2, and this was reduced with inhibition of c-Abl (Fig. 1B). To determine whether c-Abl could directly phosphorylate HIPK2, low levels of pCDNA3 FLAG-HIPK2 wild type and kinase-dead (K221A) were expressed with constitutively active c-Abl (c-Abl Δ1–81) (Fig. 1C). c-Abl phosphorylated both wild-type and kinase-dead HIPK2. In addition, c-Abl led to a dramatic increase in the accumulation of wild-type HIPK2, which was barely detectable under these conditions in the absence of c-Abl. The basal level of kinase-dead HIPK2 was higher than the wild type, and expression of c-Abl did not dramatically affect its accumulation. Nevertheless, this mutant was also tyrosine-phosphorylated in the presence of c-Abl. As noted above, HIPK2 autophosphorylates at Tyr354; however, the kinase-dead mutant does not display this activity. Thus, the phosphorylation of the kinase-dead mutant, and by implication also of wild-type HIPK2, is likely mediated by c-Abl in trans, and not due to HIPK2 autophosphorylation. Furthermore, c-Abl co-immunoprecipitated with wild-type and kinase-dead HIPK2, implying a direct interaction (Fig. 1C).
To identify the putative c-Abl phosphorylation sites, we used truncation mutants of HIPK2. This analysis indicated that active c-Abl phosphorylated sites in both the N-terminal and the C-terminal halves of HIPK2 (Fig. 1D). To characterize the putative phosphorylation sites in the kinase domain, we used the HIPK2 truncation mutant 1–1019, which is missing the three putative C-terminal sites. c-Abl phosphorylated the C-terminally truncated HIPK2 with a mutation at the autophosphorylation site (Y354F) to the same degree as the wild-type control, indicating that the tyrosine phosphorylation was not due to activation of HIPK2 intrinsic autophosphorylation (Fig. 1E). Mutation of the c-Abl consensus phosphorylation sites in the kinase domain, Tyr293 and Tyr360, showed that the Y360F mutant was poorly phosphorylated by c-Abl, indicating that Tyr360 appears to be a site of c-Abl phosphorylation (Fig. 1F). Interestingly, the Y360F mutant was also less stabilized by c-Abl, as indicated by the level of HIPK2 in the total cell extracts (Fig. 1F). These results suggest that c-Abl phosphorylation leads to the accumulation of HIPK2, at least in part via Tyr360 phosphorylation. As noted above (Fig. 1C), protein levels of full-length FLAG-HIPK2 expressed from the pCDNA3 vector were barely detectable by immunoblot, unless very high amounts of the vector were used. To increase HIPK2 levels, we also used the pEFIRES vector, which gave higher expression than pCDNA3. Using pEFIRES, high levels of FLAG-HIPK2 were observed even in the absence of c-Abl. Basal autophosphorylation of HIPK2 was seen under these conditions, but active c-Abl led to a large increase in HIPK2 phosphorylation (Fig. 1G), indicating that the phosphorylation observed with c-Abl expression was not merely due to the protein level of HIPK2.
Interaction of HIPK2 and c-Abl
To further explore the interaction between HIPK2 and c-Abl, we used truncation mutants of c-Abl (Fig. 2A). Here, the wild-type c-Abl construct used was full-length c-Abl, rather than the constitutively active Δ1–81 c-Abl mutant. All of the c-Abl constructs phosphorylated and co-immunoprecipitated with HIPK2. Interestingly, even the ΔSH3 c-Abl mutant, missing the domain for interaction with PXXP motifs, interacted with HIPK2. Deletion of the extreme C terminus of c-Abl (1–1044 mutant), which comprises domains for binding to G- and F-actin, did not impair binding to HIPK2. On the other hand, the 1–730 mutant, although still capable of interacting with HIPK2, was less competent, considering the high expression level of this mutant. This suggests that the 730–1044 region of c-Abl contributes to the interaction between HIPK2 and c-Abl.
The overexpression experiments suggested a direct interaction between HIPK2 and c-Abl. To demonstrate that the endogenous proteins interact in vivo, we used reciprocal co-IP. Fig. 2B shows that endogenous c-Abl co-immunoprecipitated with endogenous HIPK2, and vice versa. To further show that the interaction between HIPK2 and c-Abl is direct, bacterially expressed recombinant fragments of HIPK2 were incubated with in vitro expressed and labeled c-Abl (Fig. 2C). Both the 1–520 and the 551–1191 recombinant fragments of HIPK2 interacted with c-Abl, with a slightly stronger association observed for the C-terminal fragment. These results demonstrate a direct interaction, mediated by domains found in both the N terminus and the C terminus of HIPK2.
To address the question of whether c-Abl could directly phosphorylate HIPK2, we employed an in vitro assay using bacterially expressed recombinant HIPK2. c-Abl Δ1–81 wild type or kinase mutant (K290H) was overexpressed in HEK293 cells and isolated by immunoprecipitation. Recombinant HIPK2 was phosphorylated in vitro by the immunoprecipitated wild-type, but not kinase-dead, c-Abl (Fig. 2D). Wild-type c-Abl also phosphorylated the recombinant fragment of Abi, which served as a positive control. Strong binding of Abi to Abl may have interfered with detection of Abl in these lanes. In addition, incomplete stripping of the phospho-Tyr (PY20) antibody from FLAG-HIPK2 is likely to have interfered with subsequent detection by the anti-FLAG antibody. These results show that c-Abl directly interacts with and phosphorylates HIPK2.
c-Abl Increases HIPK2 Activation of p53 Apoptotic Targets
We next determined whether phosphorylation of HIPK2 by c-Abl affected its activity. HIPK2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser46, and the phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 increases its activation of pro-apoptotic gene targets. To assess the role of c-Abl in inducing apoptotic genes through p53 and HIPK2, we used a luciferase reporter assay (Fig. 3). For this assay, we expressed HIPK2 using the pEFIRES vector, which gives high expression of HIPK2, and under the conditions used, the protein level of HIPK2 was not greatly affected by c-Abl (as seen in Fig. 1G). Expression of p53 alone led to slight induction of the target genes Bax and PIG3. When co-expressed with either c-Abl or HIPK2, induction of the target genes by p53 was moderately increased. However, when both HIPK2 and c-Abl were expressed with p53, the induction increased dramatically (Fig. 3, A and B). Treatment of the cells with the c-Abl inhibitor STI571 demonstrated that the effect required c-Abl kinase activity (Fig. 3C). We next tested the ability of the Y360F mutant to activate p53. Using the pEFIRES vector, this mutant, like the wild type, was expressed at high levels (data not shown). Previous studies had shown that this mutation does not impair HIPK2 kinase activity (10), and consistent with this observation, the Y360F mutant was active in inducing the p53 reporter (Fig. 3D). In addition, like the wild type, the effect was multiplied in the presence of c-Abl. These results indicate that c-Abl synergizes with HIPK2 in the induction of pro-apoptotic target genes by p53.
c-Abl Inhibits Degradation of HIPK2
Our results (Fig. 1) indicated that expression of active c-Abl led to an accumulation of HIPK2. To determine whether c-Abl could be affecting the protein stability of HIPK2, we compared the half-life of FLAG-HIPK2 in the presence or absence of active c-Abl. The level of FLAG-HIPK2 decreased over 12 h in the presence of cycloheximide, but with co-expression of c-Abl, FLAG-HIPK2 was stabilized (Fig. 4A). Our results above (Fig. 1F) had suggested that the FLAG-HIPK2 1–1019 Y360F mutant was less stable than the wild type. HIPK2 is a target of several E3 ligases, including Siah. To determine the role of c-Abl phosphorylation, as well as the Tyr360 residue, in the protection of HIPK2 from Siah-mediated degradation, we compared the ability of c-Abl to protect wild-type or Y360F full-length FLAG-HIPK2 from degradation by Siah-1 in transfected HEK293 cells (Fig. 4B). The level of wild-type FLAG-HIPK2 was reduced with co-expression of Siah-1. Constitutively active c-Abl, but not kinase-dead c-Abl, was able to mitigate Siah-1-mediated degradation. In contrast, the Y360F mutant was degraded with Siah-1 co-expression, and expression of c-Abl was not able to restore the level of HIPK2 (Fig. 4B).
HIPK2 Accumulation in Response to DNA Damage Requires an Active c-Abl
In response to DNA damage, HIPK2 protein accumulates. We next tested whether c-Abl is needed for accumulation of endogenous HIPK2 in response to DNA damage. Upon DNA damage by UV or γ-irradiation (IR), endogenous HIPK2 protein accumulated, but this was reduced in cells treated with the c-Abl inhibitor STI571 (Fig. 5, A and B). The effect was similar in p53-null Hep3B cells (Fig. 5A) as well as in p53-positive HEK293 cells (Fig. 5B), indicating that the effect is neither cell line-specific nor dependent on p53. The effect of c-Abl was on HIPK2 protein level, as RNA levels were not affected (Fig. 5C). STI571 inhibits ABL kinases, but also has been shown to inhibit a limited number of other kinases such as c-Kit and PDGF receptor (PDGFR) (37). To validate that HIPK2 accumulation in response to DNA damage depended on c-Abl, and was not a nonspecific effect of STI571, we used shRNA knockdown of c-Abl. Knockdown of c-Abl abrogated endogenous HIPK2 accumulation in response to DNA damage (Fig. 5D). Our results demonstrate that c-Abl is needed for endogenous HIPK2 response to both γ-radiation and UV radiation.
HIPK2 accumulates in nuclear speckles, which partially overlap with PML nuclear bodies, in response to DNA damage (6). Using a GFP-HIPK2 fusion construct, we analyzed the cells using ImageStream, a technique that combines FACS with single-cell microscopy for the analysis and quantification of fluorescent signals for hundreds of cells per sample. Using the Spot Count feature, we quantified the nuclear GFP-HIPK2 accumulation in speckles (Fig. 6A). This accumulation increased with UV and was reduced with inhibition of c-Abl. We also used ImageStream to quantify co-localization of GFP-HIPK2 with mRFP-PML IV in response to DNA damage. This analysis showed an increased association of HIPK2 with PML in response to UV irradiation. Interestingly, this association was reduced with inhibition of c-Abl (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that HIPK2 colocalization with PML in nuclear speckles in response to DNA damage depends on c-Abl activity.
HIPK2 Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 and Apoptotic Response to DNA Damage Are c-Abl-dependent
HIPK2 phosphorylates p53 on Ser46 in response to DNA damage. As was seen with the DNA damage-induced accumulation of HIPK2, the induction of phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 was also inhibited by STI571 (Fig. 7A). This was observed in HepG2 cells that express endogenous p53. Furthermore, apoptosis, as seen by cleavage of caspase 3, was inhibited with c-Abl inhibition (Fig. 7A). In addition, a similar effect was observed in p53-null Hep3B cells upon reintroduction of p53 via transfection (Fig. 7B) or through stable transduction (Fig. 7C). Inhibition of c-Abl reduced p53 Ser46 phosphorylation that was induced by both IR (Fig. 7, A and B) and UV (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, DNA damage-induced expression of p53 target genes was blunted upon inhibition of c-Abl (Fig. 7D). Together these results demonstrate that c-Abl activity is needed for HIPK2 phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 and the ensuing apoptotic response to DNA damage by IR and UV.
HIPK2 Accumulation and Activity Are Inhibited at High Cell Density
DNA damage-induced apoptosis is inhibited at high cell density, and we have recently demonstrated that the Hippo pathway, activated at high cell density, is involved in mediating this effect. The Hippo pathway kinase Lats2 inhibits c-Abl activity and prevents the phosphorylation of the downstream substrates Yap and p73 (29). Because our data showed that c-Abl was needed for accumulation and activation of HIPK2 in response to DNA damage, we wanted to know whether high cell density, as well as Lats2, would likewise inhibit HIPK2. As predicted, overexpression of Lats2 reduced the phosphorylation and accumulation of HIPK2 by active c-Abl (Fig. 8A). High cell density inhibits c-Abl activation in response to DNA damage (29). To determine whether HIPK2 accumulation is inhibited under this condition, Hep3B cells were plated under sparse and dense conditions and treated with IR or UV. High cell density prevented HIPK2 accumulation in response to both IR and UV (Fig. 8B). Furthermore, phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 and induction of apoptosis, as seen by cleavage of caspase 3, were reduced in densely plated cells (Fig. 8, C and D). Taken together, these data support a model where HIPK2 response to UV and γ-irradiation is dependent upon c-Abl activity. HIPK2 activity is inhibited at high cell density, when c-Abl activation is inhibited by Lats2 (Fig. 8E). Environmental conditions, such as cell density, affect cell fate choices in response to DNA damage. Regulation of c-Abl activity by the Hippo pathway enables the cell to modulate its response to DNA damage according to conditions of cell density.
Discussion
In this study, we show that the accumulation and activity of HIPK2 in response to DNA damage by IR or UV were dependent on c-Abl kinase activity. Consistently, a reduction in the downstream phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 was also seen upon c-Abl inhibition. Although much is known about response of p53 to DNA damage, many aspects of cell fate decision-making in response to DNA damage are still not well understood. Upon DNA damage, the first objective is to repair the DNA and to restore its proper, lesion-free status. However, with massive DNA damage, perfect repair may not be attainable, and thus the cell must decide from among several cell fates, including apoptosis and senescence. Certain conditions have been shown to promote or prevent particular responses to DNA damage. For example, it is a long-observed phenomenon that cells in culture plated at high cell density are resistant to DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Induction of DNA damage-induced p53-dependent apoptosis is inhibited at high cell density (30). The involvement of high cell density suggested to us that the Hippo pathway, which is activated under these conditions, might play a role in determining cell fate in the DNA damage response. Lats2, a core kinase of the Hippo pathway, inhibits c-Abl, and this prevents Yap/p73-mediated DNA damage-induced apoptosis at high cell density (29). c-Abl had been shown to regulate p53 levels and activity through inhibition of Mdm2 and Mdm4 (24, 38). Here, we show a connection between c-Abl and the p53 apoptotic pathway regulated by HIPK2. Because HIPK2 phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 in response to DNA damage induces apoptotic gene targets (1, 2) as well as the mitochondrial apoptotic program (3, 5), by controlling this activity, the cell can tip the scales toward or against apoptosis. c-Abl is necessary for the apoptotic response mediated by Yap/p73 (20, 21, 27, 39). Because c-Abl promotes both p73 and (through HIPK2) p53 apoptotic activity, regulation of c-Abl activity provides a means of regulating both apoptotic pathways.
HIPK2, like p53, is maintained at low levels in unstressed cells to prevent unwanted apoptosis (16). Several E3 ligases promote the proteasomal degradation of HIPK2, including Siah1/2, WSB1, Mdm2, and SCF(Fbx3) (14, 16–19). Upon DNA damage, degradation of HIPK2 is inhibited through various mechanisms. Association of HIPK2 with PML protects it from degradation mediated by SCF(Fbx3) (14). Our results show that c-Abl was needed for the accumulation of HIPK2 in nuclear speckles and association with PML (Fig. 6). This could represent an additional HIPK2 stabilization mechanism for c-Abl. Siah-1 is phosphorylated by ATM/ATR in response to DNA damage, which inhibits the E3 ligase activity (16). Here, we show that c-Abl phosphorylation of HIPK2 at Tyr360 also protects it from Siah-mediated degradation. This double-lock mechanism ensures that HIPK2 will accumulate only under bona fide conditions of severe DNA damage.
HIPK2 is also a target of Mdm2 (19). Mdm2 is phosphorylated by c-Abl, and this prevents its ubiquitination of p53 (24). Previous studies have shown a role for c-Abl in preventing Mdm2-mediated degradation of HIPK2 through a different mechanism involving CUL4A activation (40). However, Mdm2 degradation of HIPK2 appears to be more relevant at low, sublethal doses of DNA damage (19). Under our experimental conditions, we have not observed a major role for Mdm2 in HIPK2 degradation or in protection by c-Abl (Ref. 16 and data not shown). However, this does not rule out that under defined conditions, c-Abl also acts through Mdm2 to increase HIPK2 accumulation.
c-Abl was needed for the accumulation of HIPK2 in response to DNA damage, which is mediated, at least in part, by its phosphorylation of HIPK2 at Tyr360. Phosphorylation of Tyr360 is not expected, however, to affect HIPK2 kinase activity because mutation of this site does not affect HIPK2 kinase activity (10). Our luciferase reporter assay suggested that c-Abl and HIPK2 synergize to increase p53 activity on the Bax and PIG3 promoters, but the Y360F mutant was not impaired in this assay (Fig. 3). As c-Abl can phosphorylate HIPK2 on additional currently uncharacterized sites (Fig. 1D), it is possible that these may play a role in promoting HIPK2 activity. In addition, c-Abl may be acting in an indirect manner, such as by promoting HIPK2 localization to nuclear speckles (Fig. 6), that leads to increased activity through promoting HIPK2 autophosphorylation (12).
Suppression of HIPK2 accumulation at high cell density is consistent with c-Abl inhibition under this condition through the Hippo pathway kinase Lats2 (29). However, we cannot rule out that the Hippo pathway may also be affecting HIPK2 directly. HIPK2 positively regulates the downstream effector of the Hippo pathway, Yki/Yap, in flies and mammals in a kinase-dependent manner (41, 42). This activity is parallel to control of Yki/Yap by Warts/Lats. Whether any feedback loop exists where upstream Hippo pathway components may regulate HIPK2 directly is an interesting avenue to investigate. It will also be interesting to investigate whether c-Abl is involved in HIPK2 activation of Yap under basal conditions, in addition to under DNA damage. Our findings provide evidence for new interplay between Hippo, HIPK2, and the non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl, as well as illustrating network interactions between serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases that dictate cell fate.
Acknowledgments
We thank Moshe Oren and Yael Aylon for helpful discussion and for the reagents, Carol Prives for the anti-p53 antibodies, and Tevie Mehlman for analytical assistance and guidance. STI571 was kindly provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
This work was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation (Grant 551/11), the Israel Cancer Research Fund, the Cooperation Program in Cancer Research of the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) and Israel's Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), and the Minerva Foundation with funding from the Federal German Ministry for Education and Research. This work was also supported by the SFB 1036 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (to T. G. H.).
This article was selected as a Paper of the Week.
- HIPK2
- homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2
- PML
- promyelocytic leukemia protein
- ATM
- ataxia telangiectasia-mutated
- ATR
- ATM and Rad3-related
- IR
- irradiation
- IP
- immunoprecipitation
- Gy
- grays.
References
- 1. Smeenk L., van Heeringen S. J., Koeppel M., Gilbert B., Janssen-Megens E., Stunnenberg H. G., Lohrum M. (2011) Role of p53 serine 46 in p53 target gene regulation. PLoS One 6, e17574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Feng L., Hollstein M., Xu Y. (2006) Ser46 phosphorylation regulates p53-dependent apoptosis and replicative senescence. Cell Cycle 5, 2812–2819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mancini F., Di Conza G., Pellegrino M., Rinaldo C., Prodosmo A., Giglio S., D'Agnano I., Florenzano F., Felicioni L., Buttitta F., Marchetti A., Sacchi A., Pontecorvi A., Soddu S., Moretti F. (2009) MDM4 (MDMX) localizes at the mitochondria and facilitates the p53-mediated intrinsic-apoptotic pathway. EMBO J. 28, 1926–1939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mantovani F., Tocco F., Girardini J., Smith P., Gasco M., Lu X., Crook T., Del Sal G. (2007) The prolyl isomerase Pin1 orchestrates p53 acetylation and dissociation from the apoptosis inhibitor iASPP. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 912–920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sorrentino G., Mioni M., Giorgi C., Ruggeri N., Pinton P., Moll U., Mantovani F., Del Sal G. (2013) The prolyl-isomerase Pin1 activates the mitochondrial death program of p53. Cell Death Differ. 20, 198–208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hofmann T. G., Möller A., Sirma H., Zentgraf H., Taya Y., Dröge W., Will H., Schmitz M. L. (2002) Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. D'Orazi G., Cecchinelli B., Bruno T., Manni I., Higashimoto Y., Saito S., Gostissa M., Coen S., Marchetti A., Del Sal G., Piaggio G., Fanciulli M., Appella E., Soddu S. (2002) Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 11–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Puca R., Nardinocchi L., Sacchi A., Rechavi G., Givol D., D'Orazi G. (2009) HIPK2 modulates p53 activity towards pro-apoptotic transcription. Mol. Cancer 8, 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Dauth I., Krüger J., Hofmann T. G. (2007) Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 is the ionizing radiation-activated p53 serine 46 kinase and is regulated by ATM. Cancer Res. 67, 2274–2279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saul V. V., de la Vega L., Milanovic M., Krüger M., Braun T., Fritz-Wolf K., Becker K., Schmitz M. L. (2013) HIPK2 kinase activity depends on cis-autophosphorylation of its activation loop. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 27–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Siepi F., Gatti V., Camerini S., Crescenzi M., Soddu S. (2013) HIPK2 catalytic activity and subcellular localization are regulated by activation-loop Y354 autophosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833, 1443–1453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bitomsky N., Conrad E., Moritz C., Polonio-Vallon T., Sombroek D., Schultheiss K., Glas C., Greiner V., Herbel C., Mantovani F., del Sal G., Peri F., Hofmann T. G. (2013) Autophosphorylation and Pin1 binding coordinate DNA damage-induced HIPK2 activation and cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E4203–E4212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Möller A., Sirma H., Hofmann T. G., Rueffer S., Klimczak E., Dröge W., Will H., Schmitz M. L. (2003) PML is required for homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2)-mediated p53 phosphorylation and cell cycle arrest but is dispensable for the formation of HIPK domains. Cancer Res. 63, 4310–4314 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Shima Y., Shima T., Chiba T., Irimura T., Pandolfi P. P., Kitabayashi I. (2008) PML activates transcription by protecting HIPK2 and p300 from SCFFbx3-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 7126–7138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Polonio-Vallon T., Kirkpatrick J., Krijgsveld J., Hofmann T. G. (2014) Src kinase modulates the apoptotic p53 pathway by altering HIPK2 localization. Cell Cycle 13, 115–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Winter M., Sombroek D., Dauth I., Moehlenbrink J., Scheuermann K., Crone J., Hofmann T. G. (2008) Control of HIPK2 stability by ubiquitin ligase Siah-1 and checkpoint kinases ATM and ATR. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 812–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Calzado M. A., de la Vega L., Möller A., Bowtell D. D., Schmitz M. L. (2009) An inducible autoregulatory loop between HIPK2 and Siah2 at the apex of the hypoxic response. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 85–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Choi D. W., Seo Y. M., Kim E. A., Sung K. S., Ahn J. W., Park S. J., Lee S. R., Choi C. Y. (2008) Ubiquitination and degradation of homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 by WD40 repeat/SOCS box protein WSB-1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4682–4689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rinaldo C., Prodosmo A., Mancini F., Iacovelli S., Sacchi A., Moretti F., Soddu S. (2007) MDM2-regulated degradation of HIPK2 prevents p53Ser46 phosphorylation and DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cell 25, 739–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Agami R., Blandino G., Oren M., Shaul Y. (1999) Interaction of c-Abl and p73α and their collaboration to induce apoptosis. Nature 399, 809–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Levy D., Adamovich Y., Reuven N., Shaul Y. (2008) Yap1 phosphorylation by c-Abl is a critical step in selective activation of proapoptotic genes in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 29, 350–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Levy D., Reuven N., Shaul Y. (2008) A regulatory circuit controlling Itch-mediated p73 degradation by Runx. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 27462–27468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cottini F., Hideshima T., Xu C., Sattler M., Dori M., Agnelli L., ten Hacken E., Bertilaccio M. T., Antonini E., Neri A., Ponzoni M., Marcatti M., Richardson P. G., Carrasco R., Kimmelman A. C., Wong K. K., Caligaris-Cappio F., Blandino G., Kuehl W. M., Anderson K. C., Tonon G. (2014) Rescue of Hippo coactivator YAP1 triggers DNA damage-induced apoptosis in hematological cancers. Nat. Med. 20, 599–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Goldberg Z., Vogt Sionov R., Berger M., Zwang Y., Perets R., Van Etten R. A., Oren M., Taya Y., Haupt Y. (2002) Tyrosine phosphorylation of Mdm2 by c-Abl: implications for p53 regulation. EMBO J. 21, 3715–3727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kharbanda S., Yuan Z. M., Weichselbaum R., Kufe D. (1998) Determination of cell fate by c-Abl activation in the response to DNA damage. Oncogene 17, 3309–3318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wang X., Zeng L., Wang J., Chau J. F., Lai K. P., Jia D., Poonepalli A., Hande M. P., Liu H., He G., He L., Li B. (2011) A positive role for c-Abl in Atm and Atr activation in DNA damage response. Cell Death Differ. 18, 5–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yuan Z. M., Shioya H., Ishiko T., Sun X., Gu J., Huang Y. Y., Lu H., Kharbanda S., Weichselbaum R., Kufe D. (1999) p73 is regulated by tyrosine kinase c-Abl in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. Nature 399, 814–817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ben-Yehoyada M., Ben-Dor I., Shaul Y. (2003) c-Abl tyrosine kinase selectively regulates p73 nuclear matrix association. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34475–34482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Reuven N., Adler J., Meltser V., Shaul Y. (2013) The Hippo pathway kinase Lats2 prevents DNA damage-induced apoptosis through inhibition of the tyrosine kinase c-Abl. Cell Death Differ. 20, 1330–1340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bar J., Cohen-Noyman E., Geiger B., Oren M. (2004) Attenuation of the p53 response to DNA damage by high cell density. Oncogene 23, 2128–2137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Weidtkamp-Peters S., Lenser T., Negorev D., Gerstner N., Hofmann T. G., Schwanitz G., Hoischen C., Maul G., Dittrich P., Hemmerich P. (2008) Dynamics of component exchange at PML nuclear bodies. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2731–2743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hobbs S., Jitrapakdee S., Wallace J. C. (1998) Development of a bicistronic vector driven by the human polypeptide chain elongation factor 1α promoter for creation of stable mammalian cell lines that express very high levels of recombinant proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 252, 368–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Haupt Y., Maya R., Kazaz A., Oren M. (1997) Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387, 296–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Okada N., Yabuta N., Suzuki H., Aylon Y., Oren M., Nojima H. (2011) A novel Chk1/2-Lats2-14-3-3 signaling pathway regulates P-body formation in response to UV damage. J. Cell Sci. 124, 57–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Levy D., Adamovich Y., Reuven N., Shaul Y. (2007) The Yes-associated protein 1 stabilizes p73 by preventing Itch-mediated ubiquitination of p73. Cell Death Differ. 14, 743–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ortyn W. E., Perry D. J., Venkatachalam V., Liang L., Hall B. E., Frost K., Basiji D. A. (2007) Extended depth of field imaging for high speed cell analysis. Cytometry A 71, 215–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Buchdunger E., Cioffi C. L., Law N., Stover D., Ohno-Jones S., Druker B. J., Lydon N. B. (2000) Abl protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 295, 139–145 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zuckerman V., Lenos K., Popowicz G. M., Silberman I., Grossman T., Marine J. C., Holak T. A., Jochemsen A. G., Haupt Y. (2009) c-Abl phosphorylates Hdmx and regulates its interaction with p53. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 4031–4039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gong J. G., Costanzo A., Yang H. Q., Melino G., Kaelin W. G., Jr., Levrero M., Wang J. Y. (1999) The tyrosine kinase c-Abl regulates p73 in apoptotic response to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Nature 399, 806–809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Raina D., Ahmad R., Chen D., Kumar S., Kharbanda S., Kufe D. (2008) MUC1 oncoprotein suppresses activation of the ARF-MDM2-p53 pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther. 7, 1959–1967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chen J., Verheyen E. M. (2012) Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase regulates Yorkie activity to promote tissue growth. Curr. Biol. 22, 1582–1586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Poon C. L., Zhang X., Lin J. I., Manning S. A., Harvey K. F. (2012) Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase regulates Hippo pathway-dependent tissue growth. Curr. Biol. 22, 1587–1594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]