Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
. 2015 May 22;29(7):958–963. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.79

Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid: clinicopathological features and outcome in Asian Indians

S Kaliki 1,*, A Ayyar 1, T V Dave 1, M J Ali 1, D K Mishra 2, M N Naik 1
PMCID: PMC4506352  PMID: 25998946

Abstract

Purpose

To study the clinical and histopathological features of eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) and to evaluate the prognosis in the Asian-Indian population.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 191 patients with SGC.

Results

The mean age at presentation of eyelid SGC was 57 years (median, 56 years). The tumor epicenter was most commonly located in the upper eyelid (n=125, 65%). The mean tumor basal diameter was 15 mm (median, 10 mm). There was evidence of tumor extension into the orbit (n=30, 16%), paranasal sinuses (n=3, 2%), and brain (n=1, 1%). Wide excision biopsy (n=146, 78%) was the most common treatment modality. Tumor recurrence was noted in 42 (24%) patients over a mean follow-up period of 29 months (median, 20 months). On the basis of the Kaplan–Meier estimate, lymph node metastasis occurred in 18%, systemic metastasis was detected in 10%, and death occurred in 2% of patients at 10 years. On multivariate analysis, the factors predicting locoregional lymph node and systemic metastasis were medial canthal involvement (P=0.004; P=0.013), lateral canthal involvement (P=0.013; P=0.025), tumor basal diameter >10 mm (P=0.002; P=0.002), and perivascular invasion (P=0.043; P<0.001), respectively. The factors predicting death due to metastasis on multivariate analysis were medial canthal involvement (P=0.012) and tumor basal diameter >10 mm (P=0.001).

Conclusion

Advanced eyelid SGC is a tumor associated with poor prognosis. In this study, canthal involvement, larger tumor diameter, and perivascular invasion were poor prognostic factors.

Introduction

Sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) is more frequent in the head and neck region, with eyelid being the most common site. In a retrospective study of 1349 patients with SGC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1973 through 2004 in the US population, eyelid was the most common site including 522 (39%) cases.1 Eyelid SGC is relatively uncommon accounting for 1–5% cases of malignant eyelid tumors in the USA.2 In the United Kingdom, the estimated annual incidence is 0.41 cases per million population.3 In the Asian-Indian population, eyelid SGC is a relatively common eyelid malignancy accounting for 28–60% cases of all eyelid malignancies.2, 4, 5

Eyelid SGC is an aggressive tumor causing metastasis-related mortality in 3–41%.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 On the basis of published literature, the clinical features predictive of poor prognosis are duration of symptoms >6 months, tumor diameter exceeding 10 mm, involvement of both upper and lower eyelids, and orbital invasion.10 The pathologic features predictive of poor prognosis are multicentric origin, poor differentiation, high infiltrative pattern, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, and pagetoid invasion by the tumor.9, 10 Herein, in this study, we evaluate the factors predicting locoregional lymph node metastasis, systemic metastasis, and death in 191 Asian-Indian patients.

Materials and methods

A computerized database search was conducted for the diagnosis of ‘Eyelid SGC' at the Institute for Eye Cancer, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India from April 1995 to May 2013. All patients with confirmation of diagnosis of SGC on histopathology were included in this study. This is a retrospective interventional case series. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the study.

The data were retrieved from the medical records. The data included age at diagnosis (years), gender, referral diagnosis, prior intervention, laterality, presenting complaints, duration of symptoms (months), and associated ocular/systemic disease. The status of eyelid margin, tumor epicenter, extent of tissue involvement by the tumor, largest tumor dimension (mm), lesion morphology, and associated features (intrinsic vascularity, overlying skin, and underlying conjunctival changes) were noted. The gland of tumor origin was determined on the basis of tumor location (meibomian gland, Glands of Zeis, sebaceous glands of caruncle, ectopic). Tumors located at the eyelid margin were classified as tumors arising from glands of Zeis, tumors at tarsal plate and/or larger tumors with tarsal plate as epicenter as tumors arising from the meibomian glands, and tumors at caruncle as tumors arising from the meibomian glands of the caruncle. All findings were documented by large drawings and external photography. Computed tomography of the orbit was performed in those cases with no visualization of the posterior extent of tumor. Locoregional lymph node examination was performed in all cases. In those cases with palpable lymph nodes, fine needle aspiration cytology was performed to rule out locoregional metastatic spread of tumor. Systemic metastatic workup was done with chest X-ray, ultrasound abdomen, and liver function tests.

The details of primary treatment were recorded. In cases that received secondary and/or adjuvant treatment, the indication of treatment and treatment details were noted. Any event of tumor recurrence and the time interval between primary treatment and tumor recurrence (months) were recorded. Histopathology features were noted. The final outcome at last follow-up (alive and well, alive with locoregional/systemic metastasis, dead owing to metastasis/unrelated cause) was recorded. The date and interval to locoregional lymph node/systemic metastasis were recorded. If the patient was deceased, the date and interval to metastasis-related death as indicated by the family was recorded.

Statistical analysis

The Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative probability of locoregional lymph node metastasis, systemic metastasis, and death due to metastasis at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years of follow-up. The factors predictive of locoregional lymph node metastasis, systemic metastasis, and death were analyzed using multivariate Cox-regression model with stepwise elimination using Akaike information criteria. The factors significant at the 0.05 level on multivariate analysis were reported.

Results

A total of 191 patients with eyelid SGC were included in this study. The demographic details are listed in Table 1. The mean age at presentation was 57 years (median, 56 years; range, 21–100 years). There were 78 (41%) males and 113 (59%) females. The mean duration of symptoms was 21 months (median, 13 months; range, 1–260 months). Two patients had a history of retinoblastoma, among whom one patient had undergone prior orbital external beam radiotherapy for retinoblastoma.

Table 1. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid in 191 cases: demographics and clinical features.

Features n (%)
Age (years), mean (median; range) 57 (56; 21–100)
   
Gender (n=191)
 Male 78 (41)
 Female 113 (59)
   
Laterality (n=191)
 Unilateral 191 (100)
 Bilateral 0 (0)
   
Referral diagnosis (n=131)
 Sebaceous gland carcinoma 60 (49)
 Squamous cell carcinoma 23 (18)
 Basal cell carcinoma 10 (8)
 Chalazion 11 (8)
 Blepharoconjunctivitis 1 (<1)
 Eyelid mass 26 (20)
Prior intervention before referral 97 (51)
Duration of symptoms (months), mean (median; range) 21 (13; 1–260)
   
Tumor epicenter (n=191)
 Upper eyelid 125 (65)
 Lower eyelid 57 (30)
 Caruncle 4 (2)
 Conjunctiva 5 (3)
Tumor basal dimension (mm), mean (median, range) 15 (10; 1–80)
   
Tumor origin (n=191)
 Meibomian gland 161 (84)
 Zeiss gland 21 (11)
 Sebaceous glands of caruncle 4 (2)
 Ectopic (conjunctiva) 5 (3)
   
Extent of tumor involvement (n=191)
 Orbital extension 30 (16)
 Paranasal sinus involvement 3 (2)
 Intracranial extension 1 (1)

The clinical features are listed in Table 1. The tumor epicenter was located in the upper eyelid (n=125, 65%), lower eyelid (n=57, 30%), caruncle (n=4, 2%), or conjunctiva (n=5, 3%). The mean tumor basal diameter was 15 mm (median, 10 mm; range, 1–80 mm). Eyelid SGC originated from tarsal meibomian glands (n=161, 84%), glands of Zeis (n=21, 11%), sebaceous glands of caruncle (n=4, 2%), or had an ectopic origin in the conjunctiva (n=5, 3%). Tumor extended into the orbit (n=30, 16%), paranasal sinuses (n=3, 2%), and/or cranium (n=1, 1%).

The treatment details are listed in Table 2. The most common primary treatment for periocular SGC was wide excision biopsy under frozen section control followed with eyelid reconstruction (n=146, 78%). Tumor recurrence was noted in 42 (24%) cases who subsequently underwent secondary treatment. Orbital exenteration was performed in 37 (20%) cases either as primary or secondary treatment. Over a mean follow-up period of 29 months (median, 20 months; range, <1–208 months), locoregional lymph node metastasis was noted in 41 (23%) patients, systemic metastasis in 26 (14%) patients, and death due to metastasis in 19 (10%) patients. The histopathology features are listed in Table 3.

Table 2. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid in 191 cases: treatment and outcome.

Features All patients (n=191)
Primary treatment (n=186)
 Topical mitomycin-C 2 (1)
 Wide excision biopsy 146 (78)
 Orbital exenteration 22 (12)
 Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy 16 (9)
   
Secondary treatment (n=175)
 Topical mitomycin-C 3 (2)
 Cryotherapy 6 (3)
 Wide excision biopsy 31 (18)
 Orbital exenteration 10 (6)
   
Adjuvant treatment (n=175)
 Systemic chemotherapy 9 (5)
 External beam radiotherapy 31 (18)
 Radical neck dissection 13 (7)
Primary/secondary orbital exenteration (n=186) 37 (20)
Tumor recurrence (n=175) 42 (24)
Time interval between primary treatment and tumor recurrence (months), mean (median, range) 19 (13; <1–125)
Follow-up duration (months), mean (median, range) 29 (20; <1–208)
   
Final outcome at last follow-up (n=181)
 Alive and well 136 (75)
 Regional lymph node metastasis 41 (23)
 Systemic metastasis 26 (14)
 Death due to systemic metastasis 19 (10)
 Death due to unrelated cause 4 (2)

Table 3. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid in 191 cases: histopathology features.

Features All patients (n=191)
Tumor differentiation (n=173)
 Well differentiated 30 (17)
 Moderately differentiated 113 (59)
 Poorly differentiated 30 (17)
   
Tumor growth pattern (n=161)
 Lobular 86 (53)
 Comedo 21 (13)
 Papillary 15 (9)
 Mixed 39 (24)
   
Mitotic activity (n=170)
 High 114 (67)
 Moderate 48 (28)
 Low 8 (5)
Pagetoid involvement of the conjunctiva (n=180) 92 (51)
Pagetoid involvement of the conjunctiva detected by map biopsy (n=129) 21 (16)
Perivascular invasion (n=180) 15 (8)
Perineural invasion (n=180) 10 (5)

Ten and 20-year Kaplan–Meier estimates of locoregional lymph node metastasis were 18 and 21%, systemic metastasis were 10 and 17%, and metastasis-related death were 2 and 8%, respectively (Table 4). The factors predictive of prognosis are listed in Table 5. The factors predicting locoregional lymph node and systemic metastasis were medial canthal involvement (P=0.004; P=0.013), lateral canthal involvement (P=0.013; P=0.025), tumor basal diameter >10 mm (P=0.002; P=0.002), and perivascular invasion (P=0.043; P<0.001, respectively). The factors predicting death due to metastasis were medial canthal involvement (P=0.012) and tumor basal diameter >10 mm (P=0.001).

Table 4. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid in 191 patients: outcome based on KM estimates.

Features KM estimate (years)
  1 year (%) 3 years (%) 5 years (%) 10 years (%) 20 years (%)
Regional lymph node metastasis 14 17 17 18 21
Systemic metastasis 8 9 10 10 17
Death due to metastasis 1 2 2 2 8

Abbreviation: KM, Kaplan–Meier.

Table 5. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid in 191 cases: multivariate analysis to predict outcome.

Features Regional lymph node metastasis
Systemic metastasis
Death due to metastasis
  Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
Medial canthus involvement 0.35 (0.17–0.72) 0.004 0.33 (0.14–0.79) 0.013 0.27 (0.1–0.75) 0.012
Lateral canthus involvement 0.42 (0.21–0.83) 0.013 0.38 (0.16–0.89) 0.025
Tumor basal diameter >10 mm 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.002 1.05 (1.02–1.08) 0.002 1.06 (1.02–1.1) 0.001
Perivascular invasion 0.42 (0.18–0.97) 0.043 0.19 (0.07–0.5) <0.001

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

Eyelid SGC is a relatively common eyelid malignancy in the Indian subcontinent, as compared with the West. Eyelid SGC is commonly seen in older individuals with a mean age at diagnosis ranging from 57 to 72 years.2, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16 In our series, the mean age at diagnosis was 57 years. Eyelid SGC is more common in female individuals.2, 12, 14, 15 In our series, there was a female preponderance with male to female ratio at 1 : 1.4.

An association between retinoblastoma and SGC has been reported.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 In patients with a history of irradiation for hereditary retinoblastoma, SGC occurs within the irradiated field usually after a delay of 5 to 15 years.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 SGC can also occur in these patients with retinoblastoma without any history of prior radiation.19, 21 In our series, there were two patients (1%) with a history of bilateral retinoblastoma. One patient had undergone external beam radiotherapy at the age of 5 months and developed eyelid SGC in the irradiated field at the age of 21 years. The second patient had no history of radiation but had a family history of retinoblastoma and developed eyelid SGC at the age of 46 years. This patient died 5 years later owing to urinary bladder carcinoma. Eyelid SGC and urinary bladder carcinoma could represent second cancers in this patient with hereditary retinoblastoma. However, some authors believe that patients with SGC are at risk for second cancers, and inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene might be a feature of SGC.19, 22

The rate of clinical and histopathological misdiagnosis is high with eyelid SGC. They typically masquerade as a recurrent chalazion, chronic blepharitis, and chronic blepharoconjunctivitis causing a clinical misdiagnosis.2, 12, 14, 15 Histopathology misdiagnosis is reported in 40–75% of cases when the sections are interpreted by an inexperienced pathologist.2, 8, 12 In our series, the referral clinical diagnosis was SGC in only 42% cases (60/142), and referral histopathology diagnosis was SGC in 49% cases (27/55). Most cases were referred with a clinical diagnosis of chalazion (8%), squamous cell carcinoma (18%), or basal cell carcinoma (8%). The histopathology diagnosis included chalazion (4%), squamous cell carcinoma (25%), or basal cell carcinoma (7%). The most common clinical and histopathology misdiagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical misdiagnosis can be avoided by careful examination of the eyelid margin, conjunctiva, and the tumor. Histopathology misdiagnosis can be avoided by examination of the sections by an experienced ocular pathologist, and with the aid of special stains such as oil red O and Adipophilin stains.23, 24

SGC most commonly arises from the meibomian glands of the tarsus (80–85%) followed by glands of Zeis (10%).2, 8, 9, 10, 12 On the basis of the literature, SGC rarely arises from the caruncle (5–10%) or the conjunctiva.8, 10, 12, 25, 26 In our series, 84% tumors arose from the meibomian glands, whereas 11% lesions were at the eyelid margin involving the glands of Zeis, 2% arose from the meibomian glands of the caruncle, and 3% had only intraepithelial SGC of the conjunctiva without involvement of the tarsus, eyelid margin, or caruncle.

The recommended management of eyelid SGC is wide excision biopsy under frozen section or Moh's micrographic surgery control followed by eyelid reconstruction.2, 15 Topical chemotherapy and cryotherapy are beneficial in cases with localized pagetoid involvement.27, 28 Systemic chemotherapy is useful in cases with diffuse eyelid SGC.29 Orbital exenteration is the recommended treatment in cases with very advanced tumors with diffuse orbital and/or pagetoid involvement.30 In our study, wide excision biopsy was done in 79% cases, and orbital exenteration was required in 20% of cases. Map biopsy from 17 sites (four clock hours of limbus, three each from upper and lower bulbar conjunctiva, three each from upper and lower forniceal conjunctiva, three each from upper and lower tarsal conjunctiva, and one from caruncle) is recommended in cases with suspicion of diffuse conjunctival, caruncle, and eyelid involvement.2, 31 In our study, pagetoid involvement was identified in 51% cases in the conjunctiva adjacent to the main tumor. On map biopsy from 17 sites in 129 patients, 16% of the cases were positive for pagetoid involvement distant from the main tumor.

Regional lymph node metastasis can occur in 20–30% of cases, systemic metastasis in 8–67%, and disease-related mortality in 3–41%.9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 32 The factors predictive of metastasis and death include duration of symptoms >6 months, tumor diameter exceeding 10 mm, involvement of both upper and lower eyelids, and orbital invasion, multicentric origin, poor differentiation, high infiltrative pattern, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, and pagetoid invasion of the tumor.10 In our series, the overall 5-year KM estimate was 17% for regional lymph node metastasis, 10% for systemic metastasis, and 2% for metastasis-related death. The factors predictive of locoregional lymph node and systemic metastasis were medial canthal involvement, lateral canthal involvement, tumor basal diameter>10 mm, and perivascular invasion. The factors predictive of death due to metastasis were medial canthal involvement and tumor basal diameter >10 mm.

In summary, eyelid SGC is a tumor associated with poor prognosis. In the present study, lymph node metastasis occurred in 18%, systemic metastasis was detected in 10%, and death occurred in 2% patients at 10 years. Canthal involvement, larger tumor, and perivascular invasion were poor prognostic factors. Patients with these features require close monitoring for early detection and treatment of locoregional and systemic metastasis.

graphic file with name eye201579i1.jpg

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support provided by Operation Eyesight Institute for Eye Cancer (SK), Hyderabad, India and Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation (SK), Hyderabad, India. Statistical analysis was provided by Mohammed Hasnat Ali, MBA, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer

The funders had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

References

  1. Dasgupta T, Wilson LD, Yu JB. A retrospective review of 1349 cases of sebaceous carcinoma. Cancer. 2009;115:158–165. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shields JA, Demirci H, Marr BP, Eagle Jr, RC, Shields CL. Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular region: a Review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:103–122. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Muqit MM, Foot B, Walters SJ, Mudhar HS, Roberts F, Rennie IG. Observational prospective cohort study of patients with newly-diagnosed ocular sebaceous carcinoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:47–51. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdi U, Tyagi N, Maheshwari V, Gogi R, Tyagi SP. Tumours of eyelid: a clinicopathologic study. J Indian Med Assoc. 1996;94:405–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sihota R, Tandon K, Betharia SM, Arora R. Malignant eyelid tumors in an Indian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:108–109. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130104031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zürcher M, Hintschich CR, Garner A, Bunce C, Collin JR. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: a clinicopathological study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1049–1055. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.9.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doxanas MT, Green WR. Sebaceous gland carcinoma. Review of 40 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:245–249. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030195025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boniuk M, Zimmerman LE. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid, eyebrow, caruncle, and orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1968;72:619–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ni C, Guo BK. Pathologic classification of meibomian gland carcinomas of eyelids: clinical and pathologic study of 156 cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 1979;92:671–676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rao NA, Hidayat AA, McLean IW, Zimmerman LE. Sebaceous carcinomas of the ocular adnexa: a clinicopathologic study of 104 cases, with five-year follow-up data. Hum Pathol. 1982;13:113–122. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(82)80115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Muqit MM, Roberts F, Lee WR, Kemp E. Improved survival rates in sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:49–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shields JA, Demirci H, Marr BP, Eagle Jr, RC, Shields CL. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids: personal experience with 60 cases. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2151–2157. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Song A, Carter KD, Syed NA, Song J, Nerad JA. Sebaceous cell carcinoma of the ocular adnexa: clinical presentations, histopathology, and outcomes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24:194–200. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31816d925f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Font RL.Sebaceous gland tumors In: Spencer WH.(ed). Ophthalmic pathology. An atlas and textbook4th ed. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA; 199642278–2297. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakobiec FA, To K.Sebaceous tumors of the ocular adnexa In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA.(eds). Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology2nd ed. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA; 200043382–3405. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ni C, Searl SS, Kuo PK, Chu FR, Chong CS, Albert DM. Sebaceous cell carcinomas of the ocular adnexa. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1982;22:23–61. doi: 10.1097/00004397-198202210-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Howrey RP, Lipham WJ, Schultz WH, Buckley EG, Dutton JJ, Klintworth GK, et al. Sebaceous gland carcinoma: a subtle second malignancy following radiation therapy in patients with bilateral retinoblastoma. Cancer. 1998;83:767–771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lemos LB, Santa Cruz DJ, Baba N. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid following radiation therapy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1978;2:305–311. doi: 10.1097/00000478-197809000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kivelä T, Asko-Seljavaara S, Pihkala U, Hovi L, Heikkonen J. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid associated with retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1124–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00555-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rundle P, Shields JA, Shields CL, Eagle RC, Singh AD. Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid seventeen years after irradiation for bilateral retinoblastoma. Eye. 1999;13:109–110. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Survival rate and risk factors for patients with retinoblastoma in Japan The Committee for the National Registry of Retinoblastoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1992;36:121–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kass LG, Hornblass A. Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular adnexa. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33:477–490. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(89)90049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jakobiec FA, Mendoza PR. Eyelid sebaceous carcinoma: clinicopathologic and multiparametric immunohistochemical analysis that includes adipophilin. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:186–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Milman T, Schear MJ, Eagle RC., Jr Diagnostic utility of adipophilin immunostain in periocular carcinomas. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:964–971. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shields JA, Shields CL, Marr BP, Eagle RC., Jr Sebaceous carcinoma of the caruncle. Cornea. 2006;25:858–859. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000224641.35977.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Honavar SG, Shields CL, Maus M, Shields JA, Demirci H, Eagle RC., Jr Primary intraepithelial sebaceous gland carcinoma of the palpebral conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:764–767. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.5.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lisman RD, Jakobiec FA, Small P.Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelidsThe role of adjunctive cryotherapy in the management of conjunctival pagetoid spreadOphthalmology 1989961021–1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shields CL, Naseripour M, Shields JA, Eagle RC., Jr Topical mitomycin-C for pagetoid invasion of the conjunctiva by eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:2129–2133. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01239-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaliki S, Ayyar A, Nair AG, Mishra DK, Reddy VAP, Naik MN.Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the management of extensive eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma: a study of 10 cases Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surge-pub ahead of print 11 February 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Shields JA, Shields CL, Suvarnamani C, Tantisira M, Shah P. Orbital exenteration with eyelid sparing: Indications, technique and results. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22:292–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Putterman AM. Conjunctival map biopsy to determine pagetoid spread. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;102:87–90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90214-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Khan JA, Doane JF, Grove AS., Jr Sebaceous and meibomian carcinomas of eyelid. recognition, diagnosis and management. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;7:61–66. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199103000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES