Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2015 Feb 11;51(12):2301–2303. doi: 10.1039/c4cc09256b

Di-macrocyclic terephthalamide ligands as chelators for the PET radionuclide zirconium-89

Darpan N Pandya a, Sylvie Pailloux b, David Tatum c, Darren Magda b,*, Thaddeus J Wadas a,*
PMCID: PMC4507282  NIHMSID: NIHMS704531  PMID: 25556851

Abstract

The development of bifunctional chelators (BFCs) which can stably chelate zirconium-89 (89Zr) while being conjugated to targeting molecules is an area of active research. Herein we report the first octadentate terephthalamide ligands, which are easily radiolabeled with 89Zr and are highly stable in vitro. They represent a novel class of chelators, which are worthy of further development as BFCs for 89Zr.


Zirconium-89 (89Zr: t1/2 = 78.4h, β+: 22.8%, Eβ+max = 901 keV; EC: 77%, Eγ = 909 keV; 99%) has received considerable interest as a positron-emitting radionuclide due to its standardized production, long half-life of 3.3 days, favorable decay characteristics for PET imaging and its successful use in a variety of clinical and preclinical applications.1,2 However, its successful use in these applications relies upon bifunctional chelators (BFCs) which can stably chelate zirconium-89 while being conjugated to targeting molecules necessary for PET imaging. Unfortunately, Zr’s high charge (+4) small radius (59–89 pm for coordination number, CN, 4–9), and the limited data concerning Zr4+ coordination chemistry have retarded progress in 89Zr BFC development.1

Currently, the most successfully used 89Zr chelator is desferrioxamine B (DFO), which is commercially available as the iron chelator Desferal (DF), a microorganism-produced siderophore bearing 3 hydroxamate groups.3 Although a crystal structure of Zr-DFO has not been reported, DFT modelling of themetal complex suggests that it is eight coordinate with two coordination sites on the Zr4+ ion occupied by water molecules.2f,4 However, despite the wide acceptance of 89Zr-DFO in PET applications, there is debate regarding the stability of this radiometal complex in vivo.2f In order to overcome the potential issues of transchelation and non-specific accumulation in tissues, several studies have focused on modifying the conjugation chemistry needed to link DFO to antibodies or developing more effective chelators.5

Our research focused on preparing the BFCs 1 and 2 containing terephthalamide (TAM) coordinating units to form an eight coordinate complex to bind the Zr4+ cation with greater avidity (Fig. 1).6 Moreover, ligand properties such as charge and solubility can be more easily modified using TAM units relative to other chelating units described in the literature.6c Additionally, unlike previously reported 89Zr chelators, we incorporated into our ligand scaffolds a pendant arm containing a primary amine, which can be easily functionalized for conjugation to a variety of targeting ligands. These ligands were prepared by condensation of tetraamine and activated di-acid intermediates under high dilution (H.D.) conditions, resulting in the generation of two distinct regioisomers that were separated by chromatography and elaborated into 1 and 2. Further details of the synthesis are provided in the ESI.† The nonradioactive NatZr-1 and NatZr-2 complexes were prepared by reacting ligands (1 and 2, 1 equiv. each) with a slight excess of ZrCl4 (1.5 equiv.) in water under neutral conditions for 1 h at room temperature. ESI-MS analysis of NatZr-1 and NatZr-2 complexes confirmed the 1 : 1 binding of Zr4+ and ligands (1 and 2) (see ESI†).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

BFCs 1 and 2. Each di-macrocyclic terephthalamide ligand contains 8 anionic oxygen donor atoms for efficient coordination of the Zr4+ ion.

Ground state density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed for [Zr-1]4− and [Zr-2]4− using Gaussian 09 (see ESI†).7 The structures of the two complexes appear strikingly similar despite the differences in the connectivity of the ligands. The minimized structure of [Zr-1]4− was found to be 2.2 kcal mol−1 lower in energy than the structure of [Zr-2]4−, a small difference given the size and flexibility of the ligands. In both structures the coordination environment of the Zr4+ ion is closest to an llll-edge antiprism, with approximate D4 site symmetry.

Radiochemistry studies demonstrate that all ligands were quantitatively radiolabeled within 15 minutes at ambient temperature (Table 1); as good as the best radiochemistry conditions described for recently published 89Zr chelators.5ac Specific activities (As) for each 89Zr-1 and 89Zr-2 were 997 MBq µmol−1 and 985 MBq µmol−1 respectively, and are in accord with the As of other 89Zr complexes reported in the literature.3,5ac

Table 1.

Summary of optimized radiochemistry conditions

Ligand DFO 1 2
Quantity (µg) 10 10 10
T (°C) 24 24 24
Reaction time (min) 15 15 15
Reaction pH 7–7.5 7–7.5 7–7.5
Radiochemical yield (%) 100 100 100
Specific activity (As; MBq µmol−1) 1005 997 985

Lipophilicity (log P), which is a fundamental physiochemical property that plays a pivotal role in the adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of 89Zr-complexes in vivo, was determined using a water/octanol partition.8 Based upon the results of these studies, all complexes demonstrate hydrophilic character, which is most likely due to both charge (expected to be −3 at neutral pH vs. +2 for 89Zr-DFO) and the numerous hydrogen bonding motifs these ligands present in solution. This might suggest that renal excretion would be a preferred route of elimination after in vivo injection (Table 2).

Table 2.

Log P values for all 89Zr-complexes

Complex log P (n = 12)
89Zr-DFO −2.83 ± 0.04
89Zr-1 −3.38 ± 0.04
89Zr-2 −3.38 ± 0.03

The stability of each 89Zr-complex was evaluated in vitro by incubation at 37 °C in a buffered 50 mM DTPA solution (Table 3) and human serum for seven days (Table 4). 89Zr-1 and 89Zr-2 were more resistant to DTPA challenge than 89Zr-DFO over the seven-day study. Additionally, 89Zr-1 and 89Zr-2 displayed comparable stability to 89Zr-DFO in serum during the study, with no protein transchelation occurring for these complexes. These superior characteristics are believed to result from the ability of the TAM ligands to coordinate the oxophilic Zr4+ ion in an octa-coordinated fashion using the 8 anionic oxygen donor atoms in the ligand architecture.5c Further studies such as acid and metal ion titration experiments, ligand competition binding assays, and single crystal X-ray crystallography will provide further insight into the mechanism of zirconium complexation and are currently underway in our laboratories.

Table 3.

Stability of 89Zr-complexes in 50 mM DTPA (pH 7)

Day 89Zr-DFO (%) (ref. 9) 89Zr-1 (%) (ref. 9) 89Zr-2 (%) (ref. 9)
1 55 100 100
2 54 100 100
3 53 100 100
4 47 100 100
5 44 100 100
6 43 100 100
7 41 100 100

Table 4.

Stability of 89Zr-complexes in human serum

Day 89Zr-DFO (%) (ref. 9) 89Zr-1 (%) (ref. 9) 89Zr-2 (%) (ref. 9)
1 100 100 100
2 100 100 100
3 100 100 100
4 100 100 100
5 100 100 100
6 100 100 100
7 100 100 100

The biodistributions of 89Zr-1 and 89Zr-2 were determined in normal mice (see ESI†). Clearance of 89Zr-1 from all tissues occurred more rapidly when compared to 89Zr-2 at every time point. For example, 89Zr-1 demonstrated faster clearance from the blood, liver, kidney, and bone compared to 89Zr-2 even at 72 h post-injection (89Zr-1 vs. 89Zr-2:%ID/g ± SD) (blood, 0.002 ± 0.002 vs. 0.004 ± 0.002; liver, 0.38 ± 0.08 vs. 0.95 ± 0.08; kidney, 4.77 ± 0.76 vs. 24.38 ± 8.64; bone, 0.07 ± 0.02 vs. 0.25 ± 0.03).While both ligands are structurally similar, 89Zr-1 might bind to plasma proteins less well than 89Zr-2. This difference may relate to the different macrocyclic systems present in the structural isomers, which are comprised of two 26-atom rings in the case of 2, and two 29 atom rings in the case of 1 (Fig. 1). Alternatively, the greater flexibility in 2 may allow for the dissociation of a single macrocycle that might leave the Zr4+ ion exposed and vulnerable to attack by endogenous (protein) ligands, resulting in its decreased in vivo stability compared to 89Zr-1.

Fig. 2 displays the clearance properties of 89Zr-1 and 89Zr-DFO from the blood, liver, kidney, and bone. Compared to 89Zr-DFO, 89Zr-1 demonstrated comparable blood retention at 72 h post-injection (phi.) (89Zr-DFO vs. 89Zr-1: %ID/g ± SD) (blood, 0.000 ± 0.001 vs. 0.002 ± 0.002). However, liver and kidney retention remained elevated (89Zr-DFO vs. 89Zr-1: %ID/g ± SD) (liver, 0.07 ± 0.01 vs. 0.38 ± 0.08; kidney, 0.69 ± 0.09 vs. 4.77 ± 0.76). Increased retention of activity in the liver may result from aggregation while the increased retention of activity in the kidney may be a more complex, multi-factorial phenomenon. Although aggregation cannot be ruled out, the increasingly acidic environment within the kidney may induce changes to the molecular structure or charge of 89Zr-1 causing it to be retained with this organ. While augmentation and derivatization of the incorporated PEG groups may allow us to enhance kidney clearance, antibody attachment will cause the greatest changes to chelator biodistribution since it will be supplanted by that of the resulting bioconjugate. This will ultimately determine the utility of this ligand as a BFC for 89Zr.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Biodistribution and clearance of 89Zr-DFO and 89Zr-1 from selected tissues (n = 6 for both cohorts).

Given the affinity of 89Zr for the phosphate-rich environment of hydroxyapatite, reducing 89Zr in bone through effective chelation and clearance is an important criterion for new BFCs for 89Zr. We observed that the amount of radioactivity retained in the bones of animals receiving 89Zr-1, versus those injected with 89Zr-DFO, was not significantly different (89Zr-DFO vs. 89Zr-1: %ID/g ± SD; p value) (bone 0.078 ± 0.014 vs. 0.074 ± 0.022; p = 0.6). Furthermore, 89Zr-1 demonstrated less bone retention than other 89Zr-systems recently reported in the literature, and we speculate that this similarity to 89Zr-DFO was a matter of effective and stable chelation in addition to efficient perfusion.5c

In summary, we report two new di-macrocyclic terephthalamide ligands that efficiently complex 89Zr in vitro. 89Zr-1 was cleared more rapidly in vivo compared to 89Zr-2. The amount of radioactivity retained in the bones of animals receiving either 89Zr-1 or 89Zr-DFO was comparable. These data suggest that chelator 1 might be the preferred choice for further development. This work extends the inventory of chelators available for 89Zr and advances this field through the creation of a ligand system which chelates 89Zr rapidly and has the potential to be easily conjugated to biomolecules.

Supplementary Material

supplemental

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by NSF SBIR Phase I grant No. IIP-1215462 to Lumiphore, Inc. and Wake Forest University Health Sciences. 89Zr was provided by IBA Molecular, Inc. and Washington University School of Medicine with support from Department of Energy Office of Science, Nuclear Physics Isotope Program (DESC0008657).

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis, characterization, biodistribution and experimental details. See DOI: 10.1039/c4cc09256b

Notes and references

  • 1.Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:2858. doi: 10.1021/cr900325h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Pandit-Taskar N, O’Donoghue JA, Beylergil V, Lyashchenko S, Ruan S, Solomon SB, Durack JC, Carrasquillo JA, Lefkowitz RA, Gonen M, Lewis JS, Holland JP, Cheal SM, Reuter VE, Osborne JR, Loda MF, Smith-Jones PM, Weber WA, Bander NH, Scher HI, Morris MJ, Larson SM. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014;41:2093. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2830-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Janjigian YY, Viola-Villegas N, Holland JP, Divilov V, Carlin SD, Gomes-DaGama EM, Chiosis G, Carbonetti G, de Stanchina E, Lewis JS. J. Nucl. Med. 2013;54:936. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.110239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Holland JP, Evans MJ, Rice SL, Wongvipat J, Sawyers CL, Lewis JS. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1586. doi: 10.1038/nm.2935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ruggiero A, Holland JP, Hudolin T, Shenker L, Koulova A, Bander NH, Lewis JS, Grimm J. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:1608. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Heneweer C, Holland JP, Divilov V, Carlin S, Lewis JS. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:625. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.083998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Holland JP, Divilov V, Bander NH, Smith- Jones PM, Larson SM, Lewis JS. J. Nucl. Med. 2010;51:1293. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.076174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Holland JP, Caldas-Lopes E, Divilov V, Longo VA, Taldone T, Zatorska D, Chiosis G, Lewis JS. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Holland JP, Sheh Y, Lewis JS. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009;36:729. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meijs WE, Herscheid JDM, Haisma HJ, Pinedo HM. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1992;43:1443. doi: 10.1016/0883-2889(92)90170-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Holland JP, Vasdev N. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:9872. doi: 10.1039/c4dt00733f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Guerard F, Lee YS, Tripier R, Szajek LP, Deschamps JR, Brechbiel MW. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:1002. doi: 10.1039/c2cc37549d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Patra M, Bauman A, Mari C, Fischer CA, Blacque O, Haussinger D, Gasser G, Mindt TL. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:11523. doi: 10.1039/c4cc05558f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Deri MA, Ponnala S, Zeglis BM, Pohl G, Dannenberg JJ, Lewis JS, Francesconi LC. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:4849. doi: 10.1021/jm500389b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ma MT, Meszaros LK, Paterson BM, Berry DJ, Cooper MS, Ma Y, Hider RC, Blower PJ. Dalton Trans. 2014 doi: 10.1039/c4dt02978j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Abergel RJ, Raymond KN. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:3622. doi: 10.1021/ic052111a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Abergel RJ, Raymond KN. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2008;13:229. doi: 10.1007/s00775-007-0314-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jurchen KM, Raymond KN. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:2438. doi: 10.1021/ic051287+. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Frisch GWTMJ, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 9 (Revision D.01) Gaussian. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc.; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Avdeef A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2001;1:277. doi: 10.2174/1568026013395100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Avdeef A, Testa B. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002;59:1681. doi: 10.1007/PL00012496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mannhold R, van de Waterbeemd H. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001;15:337. doi: 10.1023/a:1011107422318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Waterhouse RN. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2003;5:376. doi: 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Percent intact complex.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplemental

RESOURCES