Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2015 Jun 1;46(2):513–517. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246246220140559

Seroepidemiology of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection in horses from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Ana Paula Neuschrank Albano 1, Gabriel Baracy Klafke 2, Tchana Martinez Brandolt 2, Vanusa Pousada Da Hora 2, Carlos Eduardo Wayne Nogueira 1, Melissa Orzechowski Xavier 2,, Mário Carlos Araújo Meireles 1
PMCID: PMC4507544  PMID: 26273267

Abstract

Paracoccidioides brasiliensis is the etiological agent of the major systemic mycosis in Brazil, called paracoccidioidomycosis. Although the Rio Grande do Sul is considered an endemic area of the disease, there are few studies on the ecology of P. brasiliensis in the state. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the infection of P. brasiliensis in horses from the mesoregion of Southwest Riograndense, using these animals as sentinels. Serological techniques, such as double immunodiffusion in agar gel (AGID) and indirect ELISA, were performed to detect the anti-gp43 P. brasiliensis antibody in horses from five different farms in the region of Bagé, RS, Brazil. Serology was performed in 200 Pure Blood English horses up to two years of age that were born and raised exclusively at the farms. Of these horses, 12% had anti-gp43 antibodies according to the ELISA results, with rates ranging from 0 to 30% according to the farm of origin (p < 0.001). Based on the immunodiffusion results, all equine serum samples were negative. These results indicate the presence of the fungus P. brasiliensis in the middle region of the southwestern state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Keywords: ELISA, gp-43, protein G-peroxidase, paracoccidioidomycosis

Introduction

The thermally dimorphic fungus P. brasiliensis is the etiological agent of the major systemic mycosis in Brazil, called paracoccidioidomycosis. This microorganism has a limited geographical distribution and is found in all regions from northern Argentina to southern Mexico, with the exception of Guyana, French Guiana, Suriname, Chile and Nicaragua (Brummer et al., 1993; Bártholo et al., 2000; Marques, 2003).

The infection of susceptible individuals occurs by inhalation of fungal propagules in their filamentous phase that are found in the environment. Although there are other hypotheses, wet soil is considered the main habitat of P. brasiliensis (Conti-Diaz, 2007). However, studies on the ecological niche of P. brasiliensis are still inconclusive, and the traceability of the fungus in the environment is very difficult due to the absence of outbreaks and poor repeatability observed in fungal isolation from the environment, as well as to variable period between infection and illness (latency), which impairs the associations among the source of infection (Bagagli and Bosco, 2008).

Therefore, studies using animals as sentinels have been important to prove the presence of the fungus in certain regions. Although paracoccidioidomycosis is endemic in Rio Grande do Sul (RS) for decades, we recently described for the first time the fungus presence in two mesoregions of the state (Albano et al., 2014). Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the presence of P. brasiliensis in another mesoregion, the Southwest Riograndense mesoregion, by seroepidemiology of horses from different stables. This region is characterized by the pampas biome, which is completely different from the rest of the country; this biome is found only in the southern half of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil), Uruguay and Argentina.

Material and Method

The study was conducted with animals from the city of Bage, which is located in the Gaucho Pampas, the microregion of Southern Campaign that belongs to the middle region of the Southwest Riograndense region, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (Figure 1). It has a mean altitude of 212 m, a climate that can be characterized as either temperate or subtropical, tepid summers (i.e., high temperatures during the day and moderate temperatures at night), and fairly cold winters with frost. The average annual temperature is 18 °C, and the monthly mean temperatures range from 12 °C in winter to 24 °C in summer. Rainfall is usually evenly distributed throughout the year, and the average annual volume is 1,472 mm, with monthly averages ranging from 104 mm to 142 mm (FEE, 2013).

Figure 1. Map showing the city of Bage, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Figure 1

Two hundred thoroughbred horses (Pure Blood English), up to two years old and born and raised exclusively at five different farms in the city of Bage, were included in the study. The animals were randomized, and those who had access to other locations before (e.g., transportation, participation in events, auctions) were excluded.

From each animal, data about the age, gender, and farms of origin, including geographical location, were collected. All animals were subjected to a single blood sample collection for serological analysis by puncture of the jugular vein. After separation of the serum, samples were stored at −20 °C until two serological tests were performed: the double radial immunodiffusion in agar gel (AGID) test and an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the fungal antigen gp43, a glycoprotein of 43 kDa, to detect specific IgG anti-P. brasiliensis.

The exoantigen was obtained as described by Camargo et al. (1988) using the P. brasiliensis isolate B-339. The gp43 antigen was purified from the P. brasiliensis exoantigen by affinity chromatography according to Puccia and Travassos (1991), and the protein concentration was determined via the Bradford method using BSA as a standard.

For the ELISA test, polystyrene microplates of 96 wells (Corning Costar Corporation, Corning, NY, USA) were sensitized with gp43 (260 ng/well) in 100 μL of carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and incubated at 4 °C for 18 h. The plates were then washed with phosphate buffered saline with 0.5% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and blocked with PBS-1% milk (skimmed milk powder diluted in PBS) for 60 min at 37 °C. Then, the plate was washed five times with PBS-T and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with the test serum diluted 1:100 in PBS. After washing five times with PBS-T, 100 μL of conjugate (protein G -peroxidase conjugate, Sigma ®, 1:10000) was added to each well, followed by incubation for 60 min at 37 °C. Following the final wash performed by ten times with PBS-T, 100 μL of substrate/chromogen (4 mg of OPD dissolved in 10 mL citrate buffer) was added. After incubation for ten min at 37 °C, the reaction was blocked by the addition of 100 μL of 1N sulfuric acid, and absorbance was determined in a microplate reader (TECAN Spectra classic) using a 450 nm filter. All samples were tested in triplicate. As a positive control, a commercially available serum (Paracoccidioides ID positive control, Immuno Mycologics, Inc., IMMY®), was used, and the serum negative control corresponded to a "pool" of negative sera from previously tested horses, which showed absorbance at approximately 0.07 to 0.10 (CUT, 2009), all equally diluted 1:100 in PBS. Samples with absorbance greater than twice the negative control were considered positive.

The immunodiffusion test was conducted with the gp43 antigen on the central orifice and the samples to be tested in the side holes. The serum positive control (Paracoccidioides ID positive control - Immuno Mycologics, Inc.) was used in the reaction in the top and bottom holes for reading and for the final interpretation of the test, as described by Camargo et al. (1988).

The study was conducted according to the standards of animal welfare and was approved by the Ethics and Animal Experimentation of the Federal University of Pelotas (EAEC n°7123). The results were analyzed by chi-square test for categorical variables with SPSS® 20.0, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 200 horses studied, 102 were females and 98 males. All serum samples were negative in the AGID test for the detection of anti-gp43 of P. brasiliensis. Nevertheless, the ELISA showed seropositivity in 24 individuals, representing 12% of the population. Of these, eleven animals were females, and thirteen were males (p = 0.589).

When the seropositivity of animals according to the farm of origin was analyzed, a significant difference (p < 0.001) was found, with two properties showing 30% positivity and one farm without any positive animal (Table 1).

Table 1. Results of the ELISA test for anti-gp43 of P. brasiliensis in horses according to their place of origin.

Place Total animals studied Seropositive n (%)
1 30 9 (30)A
2 103 3 (2.9)B
3 30 9 (30)A
4 12 0 (0) B
5 25 3 (12)AB
Total 200 24 (12)

Uppercase letters correspond to the results of statistical analysis using chi-square test, where the same letters mean p > 0.05 and different letters means p < 0.05.

Discussion

This study evaluated the seropositivity of horses for the fungus P. brasiliensis in the mesoregion of Southwest Riograndense of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

In agreement with several other studies, none of the animals were seropositive according to the results of the double radial immunodiffusion technique (AGID) (Ono et al., 2001; Corte et al., 2009; Canteros et al., 2010). However, the ELISA assay detected seropositivity in 12% of the horses studied. Corte et al. (2007) also detected low or no seropositivity in black howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.) by AGID, although IgG anti-gp43 was detected by ELISA in 60% and 44.1% of these animals, respectively.

This discrepancy in results found between techniques is associated with their sensitivity (Ono et al., 2001). The AGID technique is less sensitive, though it is more accessible because it is less expensive and easier to use. The AGID is based on a precipitation reaction that shows positive results only in serum samples with a large concentration of circulating antibodies, which is usually found in individuals with an active form of the disease of interest. For this reason, the AGID technique can be used as a diagnostic tool for paracoccidioidomycosis and is considered the gold standard for this disease. However, it is not able to detect exposure to the fungus (Palmeiro et al., 2005; Ramos e Silva and Saraiva, 2008). Conversely, to detect this asymptomatic infection, the ELISA technique is more effective, allowing for identification subjects even with low concentrations of circulating antibodies, making it ideal for seroepidemiologic studies of fungal exposure.

The seropositivity rate of approximately 12% of the animals used as sentinels for P. brasiliensis in this study is similar to that described in other states of Brazil, such as Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná, where authors have described a exchange seropositivity of 17.5% in a study with dairy cattle(Silveira et al., 2008), 30% in a study with horses (Corte et al., 2009) and 37% in a study with sheep(Oliveira et al., 2012). However, in the state of São Paulo, which is considered a hyperendemic area of PCM, previous authors have described even higher reactivity rates (i.e., 63.8% and 40.8%) of animals to the antigen of P. brasiliensis using an intradermal test (Costa et al., 1995); another study with 126 urban dogs in the Amazon described 54.8% seropositivity (Corte et al., 2009). In Rio Grande do Sul, few similar studies have been conducted to allow for a comparison of the results obtained in different mesoregions of the state. According to the results of Albano et al. (2014), which evaluated 128 wild animals as sentinels for the presence of P. brasiliensis, a positivity of 20% was found, of which 76.92% were from the Southeast mesoregion and 23.07% were from the Metropolitan mesoregion city of Porto Alegre. Another serological study in Uruguay, a country with similar climatic conditions to those found in the state of RS, showed a seropositivity rate of 23% among the horses tested, which is close to the values described in our results (Conti-Diaz et al., 1972).

As described in other serological studies that used domestic dogs and primates, the seropositivity did not differ in relation to the gender of the animals studied, suggesting that both are equally infected by P. brasiliensis infective propagules in the environment, most likely because the animals must remain in direct contact with the ground, the natural habitat of the fungus, since birth (Ono et al., 2001; Silveira et al., 2006; Corte et al., 2007; Corte et al., 2009).

The significant difference found in the seropositivity in horses in relation to farms of origin may indicate that specific environmental factors of each property could influence the fungus survival in the soil. Though none of the properties uses pesticides and they all have similar types of vegetation (pasture, improved native pasture), the soil characteristics, such as pH, humidity and concentration of organic matter and aluminum ions, should be evaluated to confirm the presence/absence of P. brasiliensis (Terçarioli et al., 2007). In fact, according to Terçarioli et al. (2007), P. brasiliensis grows in clay or sandy soil in high humidity and is inhibited in soils with high concentrations of exchangeable aluminum (Al + H). In addition, the farms' proximity to water courses should also be evaluated due to the hypothesis supported by Conti-Diaz (2007) that water is another ecological niche for P. brasiliensis. The water gives it a highly efficient ecological strategy, characterized by the use of heterothermic animals living in natural freshwater sources during a provisory period; therefore, the soil could be only the transient habitat of the fungus (Conti-Diaz, 2007; Restrepo et al., 2001). Thus, more studies are needed to elucidate the eco-epidemiology of P. brasiliensis in southern Brazil.

Conclusion

Specific IgG antibodies against P. brasiliensis were detected in the serological study of horses from the region of Bage, showing that the fungus is found in the mesoregion of Southwest Riograndense, Brazil.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) grant No. 478346/2010 - (Edital Universal 14/2010) 7. Prof. Dr. Zoilo Pires de Camargo (UNIFESP) for supplying the antigen used in the experiment.

References

  1. Albano APN, Klafke GB, Brandolt TM, et al. Wild Animals as Sentinels of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Mycopathologia. 2014;177:207–215. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9731-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagagli E, Bosco SMG. The Biology of the Xenarthra. University Press of Florida; Gainesville: 2008. Armadillos and dimorphic pathogenic fungi: Ecological and evolutionary aspects; pp. 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bártholo RM, Florião RA, Oliveira LPA, et al. Um caso fácil: um diagnóstico rápido. Bol Pneumol Sanit. 2000;8:2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brummer E, Castaneda E, Restrepo A. Paracoccidioidomycosis: an update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6:89–117. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camargo ZP, Unterkircher C, Campoy SP, et al. Production of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis exoantigens for immunodiffusion test. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2147–2151. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.2147-2151.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Canteros CE, Madariaga MJ, Lee W, et al. Endemic fungal pathogens in a rural setting of Argentina: Seroepidemiological study in dogs. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2010;27:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2009.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conti-Diaz IA, Alvarez BJ, Gezuele E, et al. Intradermal reaction survey with paracoccidioidin and histoplasmin in horses. Rev Inst Med Trop SP. 1972;14:372–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conti-Diaz IA. On the unknown ecological niche of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: our hypothesis of 1989: present status and perspectives. Rev Inst Med Trop SP. 2007;49:131–134. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000200014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Corte AC, Gennari SM, Labruna MB, et al. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection in dogs from Western Brazilian Amazon. Pesq Vet Bras. 2012;32:649–652. [Google Scholar]
  10. Corte AC, Itano EM, Freire RL, et al. Detection of antibodies to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in horses from northern region of Parana State. Semina Ciênc Agr. 2009;30:431–436. [Google Scholar]
  11. Corte AC, Svoboda WK, Navarro IT, et al. Paracoccidioidomycosis in wild monkeys from Paraná State, Brazil. Mycopathologia. 2007;164:225–228. doi: 10.1007/s11046-007-9059-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Costa EO, Diniz LSM, Fava Netto C. The prevalence of positive intradermal reactions to paraccodioidin in domestic and wild animals in São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Res Commun. 1995;19:127–130. doi: 10.1007/BF01839278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FEE - Fundação de Economia e Estatística. Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil 2013. [Acessed 16 Sep 2013]. Available at: http://www.fee.rs.gov.br/feedados/consulta/unidades_geo_mesos.asp?n=Mesorregi%E3o%20Sudeste%20Rio-Grandense.
  14. Marques AS. Paracoccidioidomicose: atualização epidemiológica, clínica e terapêutica. An Bras Dermatol. 2003;78:2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oliveira GG, Navarro IT, Freire RL, et al. Serological survey of Paracoccidioidomycosis in sheep. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:63–68. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9463-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ono MA, Bracarense APFRL, Morais HSA, et al. Canine paracoccidioidomycosis: a seroepidemiologic study. Med Mycol. 2001;39:277–282. doi: 10.1080/mmy.39.3.277.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palmeiro M, Cherubini K, Yurgel LS. Paracoccidioidomicose – Revisão da Literatura. Sci Med. 2005;15:4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Puccia R, Travassos LR. 43-kilodalton glycoprotein from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: immunochemical reactions with sera from patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis and Jorge Lobo's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;289:298–302. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.8.1610-1615.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramos e Silva M, Saraiva LE. Paracoccidioidomycosis. Dermatologic Clinics. 2008;26:257–269. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Restrepo A, Mcewen JG, Castañeda E. The habitat of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: how far from solving the riddle? Med Mycol. 2001;39:233–241. doi: 10.1080/mmy.39.3.233.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Silveira LH, Domingos IH, Kouchi K, et al. Serological detection of antibodies against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in dogs with leishmaniasis. Mycopathologia. 2006;162:325–329. doi: 10.1007/s11046-006-0046-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Silveira LH, Paes RCS, Medeiros EV, et al. Occurrence of antibodies to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in dairy cattle from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Mycopathologia. 2008;165:367–371. doi: 10.1007/s11046-008-9095-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Terçarioli GR, Bagagli E, Reis GM, et al. Ecological study of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in soil: growth ability, conidia production and molecular detection. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES