Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 May 21;66(15):4733–4747. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv237

Phosphorylation of TGB1 by protein kinase CK2 promotes barley stripe mosaic virus movement in monocots and dicots

Yue Hu 1,*, Zhenggang Li 1,*, Cheng Yuan 1, Xuejiao Jin 1, Lijie Yan 1, Xiaofei Zhao 1, Yongliang Zhang 1, Andrew O Jackson 2, Xianbing Wang 1, Chenggui Han 1, Jialin Yu 1, Dawei Li 1,
PMCID: PMC4507770  PMID: 25998907

Highlight

CK2 phosphorylation of the TGB1 protein has a critical role in promoting barley stripe mosaic virus movement in monocots and dicots by affecting the interactions between TGB1 and TGB3 proteins.

Key words: Barley stripe mosaic virus, triple gene block 1 (TGB1) protein, phosphorylation, protein kinase CK2, promotion, viral movement.

Abstract

The barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) triple gene block 1 (TGB1) protein is required for virus cell-to-cell movement. However, little information is available about how these activities are regulated by post-translational modifications. In this study, we showed that the BSMV Xinjiang strain TGB1 (XJTGB1) is phosphorylated in vivo and in vitro by protein kinase CK2 from barley and Nicotiana benthamiana. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis and in vitro phosphorylation assays demonstrated that Thr-401 is the major phosphorylation site of the XJTGB1 protein, and suggested that a Thr-395 kinase docking site supports Thr-401 phosphorylation. Substitution of Thr-395 with alanine (T395A) only moderately impaired virus cell-to-cell movement and systemic infection. In contrast, the Thr-401 alanine (T401A) virus mutant was unable to systemically infect N. benthamiana but had only minor effects in monocot hosts. Substitution of Thr-395 or Thr-401 with aspartic acid interfered with monocot and dicot cell-to-cell movement and the plants failed to develop systemic infections. However, virus derivatives with single glutamic acid substitutions at Thr-395 and Thr-401 developed nearly normal systemic infections in the monocot hosts but were unable to infect N. benthamiana systemically, and none of the double mutants was able to infect dicot and monocot hosts. The mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A weakened in vitro interactions between XJTGB1 and XJTGB3 proteins but had little effect on XJTGB1 RNA-binding ability. Taken together, our results support a critical role of CK2 phosphorylation in the movement of BSMV in monocots and dicots, and provide new insights into the roles of phosphorylation in TGB protein functions.

Introduction

Barley stripe mosaic virus is the type species of the genus Hordeivirus. Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) infects barley, wheat, and oats under natural conditions, and numerous other monocots and dicots by artificial inoculation (Bragg et al., 2008; Jackson et al., 2009). BSMV has recently been isolated from 750-year-old barley grains found near the Nile River (Smith et al., 2014), and consists of a large number of strains that were early subjects of phenotypic and host-range studies (McKinney and Greeley, 1965). BSMV has a positive-sense tripartite RNA genome (RNAα, -β, and -γ) that encodes seven major proteins (Bragg et al., 2008; Jackson et al., 2009). RNAα directs synthesis of the αa protein, which functions as the methyltransferase/helicase subunit of the replicase [RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)]. RNAβ encodes βa [coat protein (CP)], and an overlapping triple gene block (TGB) sequence encoding three major movement proteins (TGB1, TGB2, and TGB3) that are expressed from two subgenomic RNAs. RNAγ serves as the mRNA for the γa RdRp polymerase subunit, and the γb protein, which functions as a suppressor of RNA silencing and a modulator of host defences (Jackson et al., 2009).

The BSMV TGB1 protein is a multifunctional 58kDa protein with RNA-binding, RNA helicase, and ATPase activities (Donald et al., 1997; Verchot-Lubicz et al., 2010). The C-terminal region contains seven conserved helicase motifs, and mutations within one or more of these motifs have been shown to be involved in enzymatic and movement functions and RNA-binding activities (Lawrence and Jackson, 2001; Lim et al., 2008). TGB2 and TGB3 are trans-membrane proteins that are integrated in the endoplasmic reticulum bilayer (Morozov and Solovyev, 2003). Cell-to-cell movement of BSMV does not require the CP, and this property has permitted isolation of nucleoprotein complexes composed of the TGB1 protein and viral genomic and subgenomic RNAs (Lim et al., 2008). The TGB1 protein interacts directly with the TGB3 protein and indirectly with the TGB2 protein to form heterologous complexes required for co-localization of the TGB proteins at the plasmodesmata (PD) and BSMV cell-to-cell movement (Lawrence and Jackson, 2001; Lim et al., 2008; Jackson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2009). Our recent results have shown that TGB1 proteins function in eliciting resistance to BSMV strains that are unable to infect Brachypodium distachyon inbred lines containing the Bsr1 resistance gene. In the case of the North Dakota 18 (ND18) strain TGB1 protein, amino acid residues at positions 390 and 392 are critical for TGB1 protein genetic interactions with Bsr1 and for inducing resistance responses (Cui et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2012).

Although the studies mentioned above provide valuable insights into BSMV cell-to-cell movement processes, little information is available about post-translational biochemical events, such as phosphorylation, that may function in regulating intercellular macromolecular trafficking. Movement protein (MP) phosphorylation was first demonstrated to be important for virus cell-to-cell movement during investigations with the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) 30kDa MP, and this study provided important approaches for subsequent MP analyses (Citovsky et al., 1993). Several proteins may function in TMV movement, because a cell-wall-associated kinase (Citovsky et al., 1993), a PD-associated protein kinase (PAPK1) (Lee et al., 2005), an endoplasmic reticulum-associated kinase (Karger et al., 2003), and protein kinase CK2 (formerly known as casein kinase II; Ivanov et al., 2003) have been shown to be involved in in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation of the 30kDa protein (Citovsky et al., 1993). Moreover, mimicking MP phosphorylation by negatively charged amino acids inhibited MP transport through PD and delayed TMV and potyvirus spread in Nicotiana tabacum (Waigmann et al., 2000; Karger et al., 2003). More recently, phosphorylation of the MPs of other viruses, such as tomato mosaic virus (Kawakami et al., 2003; Matsushita et al., 2003), potato leafroll virus (Link et al., 2011), Abutilon mosaic virus (Kleinow et al., 2009), brome mosaic virus (Akamatsu et al., 2007), apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (Sato et al., 1995), and cucumber mosaic virus (Matsushita et al., 2002), has been shown to either enhance or inhibit virus movement during infection.

Although little information is available about the roles of phosphorylation in the movement processes of TGB MPs, potato virus X TGB1 protein is efficiently phosphorylated by N. tabacum protein kinase CK2 (Módena et al., 2008). Furthermore, tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the functions of potato mop-top virus TGB3 protein because substitution of tyrosine residues in two phosphorylation domains enhances interactions between the TGB3 and TGB2 proteins and inhibits virus cell-to-cell movement (Samuilova et al., 2013). In addition, the N-terminal half of the TGB1 protein of Poa semilatent virus (PSLV), a hordeivirus closely related to BSMV, has been reported to be phosphorylated in vitro by casein kinase 1 (CK1), protein kinase A (PKA), and protein kinase C (PKC)-like kinases present in N. benthamiana cell-wall fractions. In the case of PSLV, phosphorylation of an internal domain decreases RNA-binding activity and homologous protein–protein interactions, but experiments to determine whether these activities affect movement have not been conducted (Makarov et al., 2012). Here, we present the first evidence that BSMV TGB1 protein is phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo by the host protein kinase CK2. Our biochemical and molecular approaches demonstrated that Thr-401 in the TGB1 C-terminal region is a major phosphorylation site of the TGB1 protein, and that the Thr-395 residue serves as a CK2 docking domain. Mutational analyses of these residues indicate that a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism is involved in BSMV local and systemic infections in monocots and dicots.

Materials and methods

Plant growth conditions

N. benthamiana plants were grown in a climate chamber at 23 to 25 °C with a 14/10h light (~75 mmol m–2 s–1)/dark photoperiod as described previously (Yuan et al., 2011). Barley (Yangpi 8), wheat (Yangmai 11), and B. distachyon Bd21 plants were grown in a greenhouse until the two-leaf stage, and then inoculated and transferred to a climate chamber at the same temperature and light regimen as above until evaluated at 5 to 12 d post-inoculation (dpi).

Construction of infectious clones of BSMV Xinjiang (XJBSMV) strain

Genomic (g) RNAs of XJBSMV strain were extracted from purified virus with Trizol (Life Technologies) and used to prime reverse transcription of the gRNAs with primer BS32 as described previously (Yuan et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012). BSMV α, β, and γ cDNAs were amplified with the primer pairs XJ-1/BS32, XJ-2/BS32, and XJ-3/BS32, respectively (Supplementary Table S1, available at JXB online), and inserted into the pMD20-T vector (Takara) to generate pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ, and pT7-γXJ. Site-specific mutagenesis was carried out with a QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) to make alanine (A), aspartic acid (D), and glutamic acid (E) substitutions for XJTGB1 protein residues 395 and 401 in pT7-βXJ with the corresponding primer pairs (Supplementary Table S2, available at JXB online). These clones and all those described below were verified by DNA sequencing (Tsingke Biotech, Beijing).

To engineer XJBSMV derivatives for agroinfiltration, full-length cDNAs were amplified from pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ (or the site-specific pT7-βXJ TGB1 mutants), and pT7-γXJ clones with the primer pairs CH-10/BS-26, CH-11/BS-26, and CH-12/BS-26, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). The cDNAs then were inserted between the StuI and BamHI sites of pCass4-Rz (Annamalai and Rao, 2005), and the resulting clones and site-specific mutants with the 395 and 401 residue substitutions were designated pCa-αXJ, pCa-βXJ, pCa-γXJ, and pCa-βXJTGB1 mutants.

Mechanical inoculation of in vitro transcripts and agroinfiltration of BSMV derivatives

The pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ, and pT7-γXJ plasmids were linearized with SpeI or BamHI and used as templates for T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) in vitro transcription of capped infectious RNAs (Petty et al., 1989). The α, β, and γ in vitro transcripts were mixed in equal amounts with FES inoculation buffer (0.1M glycine, 0.06M potassium phosphate, 1% sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate, 1% bentonite, 1% celite, pH 8.5) and used immediately for inoculation of 7- to 10-d-old barley, wheat, and B. distachyon Bd21. Plasmids pCa-αXJ, pCa-βXJ, and pCa-γXJ were maintained in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and infiltrated into the lower side of N. benthamiana leaves as described previously (Yuan et al., 2011).

Immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation assays were carried out with minor modifications of a published protocol (Rubio et al., 2005). N. benthamiana leaf sections were harvested at 5 d after agroinfiltration and proteins were extracted in 2 vols (w/v) of GTEN buffer [10% (v/v) glycerol, 25mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), 1mM EDTA, 150mM NaCl, 10mM dithiothreitol, 2% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, 1% Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche)]. Extracted complexes were stirred for 30min and centrifuged at 12 000g for 30min at 4 °C. The supernatants were first incubated with TGB1 protein antibody at 4 °C for 6h, and then mixed with protein G–agarose (Millipore) beads to enrich the XJTGB1 protein. The immunoprecipitation products were washed five times with immunoprecipitation buffer [GTEN buffer with 0.15% (v/v) NP-40, 0.5mM dithiothreitol] and evaluated by Western blotting with anti-TGB1 and anti-phosphothreonine antibody (α-pT; Millipore) at 1:500 dilutions.

Construction of protein expression vectors for in vitro phosphorylation, glutathione S-transferase (GST), and His-tagged pull-down assays

To engineer XJTGB1 C-terminal His-tagged (XJTGB1-6His) fusion proteins, the XJTGB1 open reading frame (ORF) was amplified from the plasmid pT7-βXJ with the primer pair TGB1-NdeIF/TGB1-XhoIR (Supplementary Table S1), and integrated into the NdeI and XhoI sites of the pET-30a(+) expression vector (Novagen) to generate pET-XJTGB1. The TGB1 mutant derivatives of the Thr-395 and Thr-401 residues were engineered using a QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit with corresponding primer pairs for the TGB1 ORFs (Supplementary Table S2).

The α-catalytic subunit of CK2 from N. benthamiana (NbCK2α, GenBank accession no. KJ748371) (Bombarely et al., 2012) and barley (HvCK2α, GenBank accession no. AB252049) (Kato et al., 2008) was isolated from host RNA by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR amplification with the primer pairs NbCK2-NdeIF/NbCK2-XhoIR and HvCK2α-NdeIF/HvCK2α-SalIR, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). Primers for amplifying NbCK2α were based on the flanking sequence of the N. tabacum CK2α ORF (GenBank accession no. AF374474) (Salinas et al., 2001). The PCR products of the NbCK2α and HvCK2α genes were inserted into the NdeI/XhoI, and NdeI/SalI sites of pET-30a(+), respectively, to generate pET-NbCK2α and pET-HvCK2α.

For GST pull-down of XJTGB1 and XJTGB3 proteins, the XJTGB3 ORF was amplified via PCR and ligated in frame to the C terminus of the GST ORF at the BamHI and XhoI restriction sites of the plasmid pGEX-KG (Guan and Dixon, 1991) to yield the pGEX-XJTGB3 plasmid.

Expression and purification of recombinant proteins from Escherichia coli BL21 cells

The pET plasmids designed for expression of the C-terminal His-tagged XJTGB1 proteins, the XJTGB1 protein mutants, and the HvCK2α and NbCK2α proteins were transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) by standard procedures (Sambrook and Russell, 2001). Each transformant was grown overnight at 37 °C in 3ml of LB medium containing kanamycin (100 μg ml–1), transferred into 1 litre of fresh LB/kanamycin medium and grown to a density of 0.4 OD600. Recombinant protein expression was induced by the addition of 0.2mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside and the cells were shaken for 16 additional hours at 18 °C. Recombinant proteins were extracted from the bacteria and purified by Ni-affinity chromatography according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad) and evaluated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE.

In vitro phosphorylation assays

Soluble cytoplasmic protein extracts of healthy N. benthamiana leaves were used for in vitro kinase assays according to the protocol described by Hung et al. (2014) and Vijayapalani et al. (2012). Phosphorylation reactions were performed with the N. benthamiana soluble protein extracts or with purified recombinant NbCK2α and HvCK2α subunits. Assays were performed with 1 μg of N. benthamiana soluble protein extracts, or 0.1 μg of recombinant CK2α, and 1 μg of purified XJTGB1 protein or its mutants in a final volume of 10 μl of 25mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 10mM MgCl2, and 1 μl [γ-32P]ATP or GTP (10 μCi, ~3000 Ci mmol–1; Perkin Elmer). Selected reactions were carried out in the presence or absence of heparin, and various concentrations of unlabelled ATP or GTP. Negative controls contained no TGB1 protein or 500 and 1000ng of bovine serum albumin. After incubation at 30 °C for 30min, the reactions were terminated by addition of 2.5 μl of 5× SDS buffer, and the samples were subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE. The gels were dried with a Model 583 Gel Dryer (Bio-Rad) and phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.

Mass spectrometry analysis

Phosphorylated XJTGB1 and unphosphorylated XJTGB1 proteins were digested with trypsin at 37 °C overnight. The digested peptides were then analysed by Q-Exactive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Thermo Scientific) at the Mass Spectrometry Facility at China Agricultural University. The data were searched against the NCBI database using Mascot software with a 1% false discovery rate.

Fluorescence and confocal microscopy

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP) fluorescence in epidermal cells of N. benthamiana was observed with an Olympus confocol FV1000 microscope. GFP and RFP were excited at 488 or 546nm, respectively, with an argon laser. Images were recorded with an Olympus camera and processed using an Olympus Fluoview version 3.0 Viewer. In addition, cell-to-cell movement assays in epidermal cells of barley and N. benthamiana were observed with a BX53+DP72 fluorescence microscope (Olympus) and images were manipulated with the cellSens Entry programs.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA)

RNAs for binding assays were transcribed in vitro in the presence of digoxigenin (DIG)–UTP (Roche) and the DIG-labelled transcripts were purified to remove the DNA templates (Wu et al., 2013). Phosphorylation reactions were performed in a final volume of 5 μl containing phosphorylation assay buffer and purified NbCK2α, and different amounts of recombinant XJTGB1 protein as described above. Negative controls consisted of samples lacking recombinant XJTGB1 protein or 500 and 1000ng of bovine serum albumin. EMSA binding comparisons were performed by adding increasing amounts of protein to 50ng of purified RNA in binding buffer [50mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), 10mM MgCl2, 1mM EDTA] in a final volume of 20 μl. The binding reaction mixtures were incubated on ice for 30min and subjected to electrophoresis on 1% (w/v) non-denaturing agarose gels in 0.5× TBE buffer. RNA–protein complexes were transferred to a Hybond N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare) via a pump suction filter, and the RNA was cross-linked to the membrane by two 60 s cycles at 0.12 J in a Bio-Link crosslinker (Vilber Lourmat). Mobility shifts of the DIG-labelled RNAs were detected with DIG– alkaline phosphatasealkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche), and the blots were developed with a 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium chloride substrate solution (Amresco).

GST pull-down

For co-expression of GST–XJTGB3 with XJTGB1–His or the XJTGB1T395A/T401A–His fusion proteins, relevant plasmids were co-transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). Cells were harvested by low-speed centrifugation and disrupted by vortexing in TB buffer [20mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.3), 500mM NaCl] in the presence of glass beads. The GST fusions and bound TGB proteins were purified by glutathione–Sepharose affinity chromatography and elution with glutathione (Pharmacia).

Results

Construction and sequence analysis of infectious clones of the BSMV Xinjiang strain

Several BSMV field strains from China collected in our laboratory have broader host ranges than the more extensively studied NDBSMV and Type BSMV (TYBSMV) strains. To evaluate the diversity of the more virulent BSMV strains (Lee et al., 2012), we constructed infectious clones of the XJBSMV strain (Xie et al., 1981) under the bacteriophage T7 or double cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoters (Petty et al., 1989; Yuan et al., 2011) (Fig. 1A). The infectivity of in vitro transcripts synthesized from linearized pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ, and pT7-γXJ plasmids was tested by mechanical inoculation to barley, wheat, and B. distachyon Bd21. Inoculated plants consistently developed chlorotic stripes and mosaic symptoms typical of BSMV infections on upper uninoculated leaves by 6–7 dpi (Fig. 1B) and the efficiency of infectivity in barley, wheat, and B. distachyon Bd21 was 70–80, 80–90, and 50–60%, respectively (also see Supplementary Table S6). Agroinfiltration was used to initiate infections of N. benthamiana because only 10–30% of the plants became infected when using in vitro transcripts as inocula. Agrobacterium harbouring the plasmids pCa-αXJ, pCa-βXJ, and pCa-γXJ were infiltrated into the basal sides of the leaves. Newly emerging leaves developed mild mottling symptoms at 7–9 d after agroinfiltration (Fig. 1C), and the efficiency of infectivity was increased to approximate 90%. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis verified the infectivity of the XJBSMV infectious clones in the monocot hosts (Fig. 1B) and in N. benthamiana (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Diagram of XJBSMV strain infectious clones and cereal and dicot host infectivity test results. (A) Illustration of XJBSMV infectious clones under the T7 promoter or double cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter as described previously (Yuan et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012). (B) Infectivity assays with in vitro-synthesized gRNAs of barley, wheat, and B. distachyon Bd21. (C) Agroinfiltration was used to initiate infections of N. benthamiana. Typical chlorotic stripes and mosaic symptoms (top) of BSMV appeared on emerging uninoculated leaves by 7–9 dpi. Upper uninoculated leaf tissue was harvested at 12 dpi, and the relative BSMV RNA and CP amounts were evaluated by RT-PCR (middle) and Western blotting with the antibody against BSMV CP (bottom). BSMV RNAγ was detected by RT-PCR with the primer pair BS-10/BS-32 (Supplementary Table S1). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

For comparisons of XJBSMV genomic variation with other published BSMV strains, the pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ and pT7-γXJ cDNAs were sequenced. The results indicated that XJRNAα (GenBank accession no. KJ746471), XJRNAβ (GenBank accession no. KJ746472), and XJRNAγ (GenBank accession no. KJ746473) consisted of 3789, 3222, and 2793 nt, respectively, and shared nucleotide identities of 95.2–99.8% (Supplementary Table S3, available at JXB online), 94.1–99.2% (Supplementary Table S4, available at JXB online), and 87.9–98.8% (Supplementary Table S5, available at JXB online) with RNAs α, β, and γ of other BSMV strains. These results suggest that substantial diversity may exist among BSMV strains.

The XJTGB1 protein is phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo

In order to explore phosphorylation in vitro, the full-length XJTGB1 protein was expressed as a C-terminal His-tagged fusion protein and purified to near homogeneity by Ni-affinity chromatography (Fig. 2A). A soluble protein kinase is known to be present in tobacco species (Hung et al., 2014), and hence the purified XJTGB1 protein was first assayed for phosphorylation using N. benthamiana protein extracts as a kinase source. The first control reaction containing [γ-32P]ATP and cytoplasmic extracts without the XJTGB1 protein resulted in no distinct labelled products (Fig. 2B, lane 1). The corresponding control with the XJTGB1 protein and [γ-32P]ATP alone suggested that the XJTGB1 protein was not autophosphorylated in vitro (Fig. 2B, lane 2). In contrast, when both the cytoplasmic extracts and the XJTGB1 protein were present, a radioactive phosphorylated product co-migrated with the XJTGB1 protein (Fig. 2B, lane 3). These results provide evidence that the XJTGB1 protein is phosphorylated in vitro with [γ-32P]ATP by a soluble kinase in the N. benthamiana extracts. The vast majority of protein kinases use ATP as an exclusive phosphate donor, whereas CK2 can effectively use either ATP or GTP (Matsushita et al., 2000); hence we carried out phosphorylation comparisons with GTP to obtain clues about the identity of the kinase involved in XJTGB1 phosphorylation. Autoradiography of the phosphorylated products revealed a single intense radiolabelled band when either [γ-32P]ATP or [γ-32P]GTP was used as a phosphoryl donor (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4), implying that XJTGB1 is phosphorylated by a CK2-like kinase in N. benthamiana.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phosphorylation of the XJTGB1 protein in vitro and in vivo. (A) Coomasie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining of recombinant XJTGB1 protein purified from E. coli cells. Molecular weight markers (Fermentas) are indicated on the left side of the gel. (B) In vitro phosphorylation of purified XJTGB1 protein by cellular kinases present in healthy N. benthamiana extracts in the absence or presence of [γ-32P]ATP or [γ-32P]GTP. After the phosphorylation reactions, the TGB1 proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and the incorporated radioactivity was analysed by autoradiography. Reaction mixtures lacking XJTGB1 protein or N. benthamiana protein extracts served as negative controls. The CBB staining in the lower panel indicates that similar amounts of the XJTGB1 protein were present in each in vitro phosphorylation reaction. (C) In vivo phosphorylation of XJTGB1 protein in N. benthamiana by Western blotting with α-TGB1 polyclonal antibodies and α-threonine antibodies. A mock agroinfiltration lacking XJRNAβ was used as a negative control and molecular weight markers (Thermo Scientific) were used to estimate the size of the XJTGB1 protein. (D) In vivo phosphorylation of XJTGB1 protein immunoprecipitated (IP) from N. benthamiana was analysed as in Fig. 2C. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

To determine whether the XJTGB1 protein is phosphorylated in vivo, XJBSMV-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves were harvested, concentrated by immunoprecipitation, and subjected to Western blot analysis with an anti-phosphothreonine (α-pT) antibody. The α-pT results revealed a labeleld protein with an electrophoretic mobility corresponding to the 58kDa XJTGB1 protein (Fig. 2C and D, top, lane 3). Similar-sized bands were not observed in mock-inoculated leaves, or leaves infiltrated with only pCa-αXJ and pCa-γXJ (Fig. 2C and D, top, lanes 1 and 2). Western blot analyses using the XJTGB1 protein antibody confirmed that the α-pT-reacting protein co-migrated with XJTGB1, and revealed a 45kDa immunospecific band that we suspect is a degradation product (Fig. 2C and D, bottom, lane 3). Collectively, these experiments provide convincing evidence that the XJTGB1 protein is phosphorylated by a soluble CK2-like kinase in vitro and in vivo.

CK2 is able to phosphorylate the XJTGB1 protein

To predict potential XJTGB1 protein phosphorylation kinases and sites, we analysed the XJTGB1 protein sequence with the GPS 2.1 program tool (Xue et al., 2011) and the Scansite Motif Scanner online server (http://scansite.mit.edu) (Obenauer, 2003). The GPS 2.1 program was set at a HIGH threshold (false-positive rates of 2% for Ser/Thr kinases) and the Scansite was set at a high stringency level to predict potential phosphorylation targets in the XJTGB1 protein. According to the conserved CK2 phosphorylation site motif [(S/T)-X-X-(D/E); Meggio and Pinna, 2003], the GPS 2.1 predictions suggested that three residues in the XJTGB1 protein (Ser-69, Thr-395, and Thr-401) are potential CK2 phosphorylation sites, whereas the Scanner only indicated that the Thr-401 site is phosphorylated by CK2 (Supplementary Fig. S1, available at JXB online). For comparison with ND18, the XJTGB1 amino acids Ser-69, Thr-395, and Thr-401 correspond to the ND18 TGB1 (NDTGB1) Ser-70, Thr-396, and Thr-402 residues, respectively.

Based on the GTP results and phosphorylation predictions, we suspected that a CK2-like kinase might be responsible for phosphorylation of the XJTGB1 protein. Therefore, the CK2α subunits from N. benthamiana (NbCK2α) and barley (HvCK2α) were cloned, and the C-terminal His-tagged fusion proteins were purified from E. coli cells (Fig. 3A). Subsequent in vitro phosphorylation assays revealed that the purified NbCK2α and HvCK2α proteins efficiently phosphorylated the recombinant XJTGB1 protein in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP (Fig. 3B). CK2 is highly sensitive to heparin inhibition (Matsushita et al., 2003), and our results confirmed that the levels of phosphorylation were reduced proportionally with increasing heparin concentrations (Fig. 3C). To further test the kinase specificity, we used NbCK2α to compare XJTGB1 and TMV P30 MP (Ivanov et al., 2003) protein phosphorylation in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP and [γ-32P]GTP (Fig. 3D). In both cases, the NbCK2α phosphorylation assays resulted in the presence of highly intense bands that co-migrated with the XJTGB1 and P30 proteins, and the kinase exhibited similar activities in the presence of both ATP and GTP (Fig. 3D, lanes 3 and 4, and 6 and 7). Moreover, the absence of radioactive bands in reactions lacking the NbCK2α protein confirmed that the 58kDa XJTGB1 and the P30 proteins are not autophosphorylated and the lack of radioactivity in the reactions without substrate proteins also indicated that the NbCK2α protein is not self-phosphorylated (Fig. 3D, lanes 2 and 5). In addition, tests were carried out in the presence of Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ to assess the cation specificity of CK2 phosphorylation (Niefind et al., 1999). These results revealed that NbCK2α exhibited similar phosphorylation intensities for XJTGB1 and P30 in the presence of either Mn2+ or Mg2+ (Fig. 3E, lanes 2 and 3, and 7 and 8), and that 32P incorporation was negligible in reactions containing Ca2+ (Fig. 3E, lanes 4 and 9). All of the in vitro phosphorylation data with the TGB1 protein were consistent with several published biochemical properties of CK2 (Ivanov et al., 2003; Hung et al., 2014).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

In vitro phosphorylation of XJTGB1 protein by recombinant CK2 kinase. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of NbCK2α and HvCK2α purified from E. coli BL21 cells. (B) In vitro phosphorylation of XJTGB1 protein with the NbCK2α and HvCK2α recombinant proteins and negative controls lacking the kinases. (C) Effects of heparin on in vitro phosphorylation of XJTGB1 protein. Phosphorylation levels were reduced with increasing amount of heparin. (D) Ability of NbCK2α to use both ATP and GTP as phosphate donors. (E) Divalent metal ion specificity of NbCK2α and the TMV-MP (P30) proteins. The CBB-stained proteins at the bottom of panels (B)–(E) are as indicated as in Fig. 2B. (F) Co-localization of the GFP:XJTGB1 and DsRed:NbCK2α proteins in N. benthamiana leaf cells. Single localization of GFP:XJTGB1 and DsRed:NbCK2α proteins are indicated at the top of the panels. Bars, 50 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Furthermore, to explore the potential co-localization of the XJTGB1 protein and NbCK2α in planta, we conducted co-expression experiments with GFP:XJTGB1 and DsRed:NbCK2α fusion proteins in N. benthamiana cells. Confocal microscopy revealed that GFP:XJTGB1 was distributed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas DsRed:NbCK2α was present primarily in the nucleus. The co-localization of the two proteins indicated that the XJTGB1 protein and NbCK2α interact in both the nucleus and cytoplasm in some manner (Fig. 3F, overlay channel). Taken together, the presented data demonstrate that XJTGB1 is phosphorylated by CK2 in vitro and in planta.

Thr-401 is the major XJTGB1 protein site for CK2 phosphorylation

To identify the phosphorylation sites of CK2, the purified XJTGB1 protein was phosphorylated by NbCK2α in vitro with unlabelled ATP, and the gel-purified phosphorylated and unphosphorylated XJTGB1 proteins were separated by PAGE and digested with trypsin. The trypsin digestion products were analysed by Q-Exactive LC-MS/MS. The analysis showed that 87.9% of the TGB1 protein amino acid sequence was covered, and revealed that the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated proteins differed in a unique monophosphorylated peptide (399GETDETEKNIAFTVDTVR416) with a 2103.9362 m/z peak corresponding to a neutral precursor ion lacking phosphoric acid (97.9769Da). Based on the observed masses of the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated y16 fragment ions (Fig. 4A), we conclude that the phosphorylated XJTGB1 residue is located at Thr-401.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Thr-401 is the major XJTGB1 protein site for CK2 phosphorylation. (A) LC-MS/MS analysis of XJTGB1 protein phosphorylation by NbCK2α. The absence of phosphoric acid (97.9769Da) on the y16 ion fragment demonstrates that Thr-401 is a phosphorylation site for CK2 kinase. (B) Identification of the phosphorylation sites in XJTGB1 protein mutants by in vitro phosphorylation with HvCK2α and NbCK2α. The radioactive intensities of the XJTGB1 protein and its phosphorylation mutants indicate the extent of radiolabelling with [γ-32P]ATP. CBB-stained proteins at the bottom of the panels (B) and (C) are as indicated in Fig. 2B. (C) Phosphorylation comparisons of selected XJTGB1 protein mutants with wt XJTGB1 protein to confirm that Thr-401 is the major phosphorylated residue. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

To verify the GPS 2.1 and Scanner predictions (Supplementary Fig. S1) and LC-MS/MS analysis of XJTGB1 protein, we replaced one or both of the Thr-395 and Thr-401 residues with alanine residues to produce XJTGB1T395A, XJTGB1T401A, and XJTGB1T395A/T401A phosphorylation-deficient mutants. To mimic the phosphorylation state of the XJTGB1 protein, Thr-395 and Thr-401 residues were substituted with aspartic acid (D) or glutamic acid (E) residues to produce the XJTGB1T395D, XJTGB1T395E, XJTGB1T401D, and XJTGB1T401E mutants. In vitro phosphorylation comparisons of the wild-type (wt) XJTGB1 protein, and the Thr-395 and Thr-401 mutants were performed with HvCK2α and NbCK2α, respectively. Compared with the wt XJTGB1 protein (Fig. 4B, lane 1), the phosphorylation level of the XJTGB1T395A mutant protein was reduced partially (Fig. 4B, lane 2). However, both the XJTGB1T395D and the XJTGB1T395E mutant proteins incorporated slightly larger amounts of 32P label than the wt XJTGB1 protein (Fig. 4B, compare lane 1 with lanes 3 and 4), suggesting that the positive charges imparted by the aspartic acid and glutamic acid residues increased the kinase efficiency. As anticipated, the phosphorylation intensities of the XJTGB1T401A (Fig. 4B, lane 5) and XJTGB1T401E (Fig. 4B, lane 7) proteins only showed faint shadows. We also observed similar reductions during incorporation into the XJTGB1T401D protein (Fig. 4B, lane 6). We believe that Thr-395 may have been phosphorylated, and this is supported by negligible incorporation into the three double mutants (Fig 4B, lane 8; Fig. 4C, lanes 1–3). Thus, our interpretation of these results is that Thr-401 is a major phosphorylation site and that Thr-395 is a minor phosphorylation target.

Based on the data above and previous analyses of 308 CK2 phosphorylation sites for other proteins (Meggio and Pinna, 2003), we propose that Thr-395 is a docking site for CK2 because phosphorylation of this residue enhanced kinase activity at Thr-401. To evaluate this hypothesis, we used a double mutant, XJTGB1T395A/T401A, for phosphorylation. The results revealed extremely low, if any, 32P incorporation into other TGB1 residues (Fig. 4B, lane 8; Fig 4C, lane 3). To determine whether there was ‘off-site’ targeting of other residues within XJTGB1 at the proposed Thr-395 docking site, we engineered the XJTGB1T395D/T401A and XJTGB1T395E/T401A double mutants, which could not be phosphorylated at Thr-401, and both double mutants had negligible levels of 32P incorporation (Fig. 4C, lanes 1 and 2). In summary, these results support the hypothesis that Thr-395 functions as a docking residue and that Thr-401 is the major phosphorylation site within the kinase motif of the XJTGB1 protein.

Mutations of the XJTGB1 protein phosphorylation site affect BSMV local and systemic infections of dicots and monocots

To determine whether the XJTGB1 mutants affected systemic movement in N. benthamiana, leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium harbouring the pCa-αXJ, wt pCa-βXJ, or individual TGB1 mutant derivatives, and the pCa-γXJ clones. Three independent experiments revealed that only wt XJTGB1 and the βXJ-TGB1T395A mutant, which exhibited slightly lower phosphorylation levels than the wt XJTGB1 protein, were able to establish systemic infections at 10 dpi (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and 3). None of the remaining infiltrations containing single or double XJTGB1 mutants developed mosaic symptoms or invaded the upper uninoculated leaves as assessed by the absence of CP accumulation (Fig. 5A, lanes 4–11).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Mutants affecting phosphorylation of the XJTGB1 protein have host-specific effects on systemic infectivity. (A) Symptoms of N. benthamiana elicited after infiltration with an Agrobacterium mixture harbouring pCa-αXJ, pCa-γXJ, and pCa-βXJ or its phosphorylation site mutants. Upper uninfiltrated leaf tissues were harvested and photographed at 10 dpi (top). CP ELISA (middle) and RNAγ RT-PCR amplification (bottom) were monitored to estimate the infectivity levels. (B, C) Systemic symptoms appearing in barley (B) and wheat (C) after inoculation with pT7-αXJ and pT7-γXJ in vitro transcripts mixed with pT7-βXJ and various phosphorylation mutant transcripts. Leaves were photographed at 14 dpi (top) and all experiments were repeated three times. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

For systemic infectivity on monocots, barley and wheat leaves were co-inoculated with in vitro transcripts of pT7-αXJ, pT7-βXJ (wt or mutant derivatives), and pT7-γXJ. Visual observations, ELISA and RT-PCR analyses demonstrated that the barley and wheat plants had similar systemic infections on upper uninoculated leaves at 14 dpi after wt and mutant XJTGB1 inoculations (Fig. 5B, C). In the case of βXJ-TGB1T395A, a milder infection phenotype was noted on the systemically infected cereal leaves, compared with those of the wt βXJ infections (Fig. 5B, C, lanes 2 and 3), but the aspartic acid mutant βXJ-TGB1T395D was unable to infect the plants systemically (Fig. 5B, C, lane 4). In contrast, when inoculated with the βXJ-TGB1T395E mutant, which more effectively mimics phosphorylation of threonine residues, the cereal plants exhibited CP accumulation levels that were similar to wt BSMV (Fig. 5B, C, lane 5). Moreover, the βXJ-TGB1T401E mutant elicited systemic infections, albeit with slightly lower CP levels (Fig. 5B, C, lane 8), but the levels were higher than those with βXJ-TGB1T401A (Supplementary Table S6, available at JXB online). However, the βXJ-TGB1T395A/T401A, βXJ-TGB1T395D/T401A, and βXJ-TGB1T395E/T401A double mutants were unable to infect either barley or wheat (Fig. 5B, lanes 9–11).

Taken together, these results demonstrated that the XJTGB1 phosphorylation site mutations generally reduced the infection efficiencies in dicots and monocots, and that the mutants had more dramatically compromised systemic movement phenotypes in N. benthamiana. To summarize, the T395A, T395E, T401A, and T401E mutants exhibited systemic movement in barley and wheat, whereas only the T395A mutant is able to establish systemic infections in N. benthamiana.

We next conducted experiments to evaluate the cell-to-cell movement profiles of the Thr-395 and Thr-401 mutants in N. benthamiana and barley. For this purpose, N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium containing pCa-αXJ, pCa-βXJ and its mutant derivatives, and a pCa-γXJ:GFP construct that harbours a γb:GFP reporter gene to assess cell-to-cell movement. In barley, leaves were co-inoculated with T7 transcripts of the RNAα, RNAβ derivatives, and RNAγ-γXJ:GFP transcripts. Epidermal cells of the leaves were observed by confocal microscopy at 3 dpi and compared with inoculated controls lacking the RNAβ.

The localized movement in infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves generally reflected the systemic infection phenotypes elicited by the mutants (Fig. 6A). In N. benthamiana, the wt βXJ and βXJ-TGB1T395A mutant both exhibited cell-to-cell movement encompassing several cells at 3 dpi (Fig. 6A), as expected due to their ability to elicit systemic infections. The remaining mutants usually developed fluorescence in a single cell or rarely in two to three adjacent cells (Fig. 6A). Hence, the localized movements of the mutants correlated reasonably well with their systemic movement patterns in N. benthamiana. In barley leaves, most of the fluorescence at 3 dpi appeared in mesophyll cells, but in this case, the virus had to traverse only two to three cell layers before encountering the closely aligned parallel vasculature (Fig. 6B). Hence, the βXJ-TGB1T395A, βXJ-TGB1T395E, and βXJ-TGB1T401A mutants that established systemic infections in barley and wheat needed to negotiate only a limited number of mesophyll cells to reach the vascular elements for systemic spread, whereas movement through a larger number of cells was required to reach the dicot vasculature. The other mutants, βXJ-TGB1T395D, βXJ-TGB1T401D, and βXJ-TGB1T395A/T401A, exhibited more limited cell-to-cell movement compared with βXJ-TGB1T395A, βXJ-TGB1T395E, and βXJ-TGB1T401A, but could spread to a few adjacent cells. However, these three mutants were unable to invade the upper cereal leaves. Hence, these results demonstrate that phosphorylation activities at Thr-395 and Thr-401 differentially affecte systemic movement in monocot versus dicot hosts and suggest that at least some of the host-specific results may be a consequence of the vasculature architecture of these hosts.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Effects of XJTGB1 protein phosphorylation on XJBSMV cell-to-cell movement in N. benthamiana and barley. (A) Fluorescence in N. benthamiana leaves at 3 dpi with an Agrobacterium mixture of pCa-αND, pCa-γND:GFP, and pCa-βXJ or the pCa-βXJ mutant derivatives. The total bacterial concentrations for infiltration were OD600 of 0.08. (B) Fluorescence in barley leaves at 3 dpi with in vitro transcripts of RNAα and RNAγ:GFP plus wt XJRNAβ or the XJRNAβ phosphorylation site mutant derivatives. Bars represent 500 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Phosphorylation promotes virus infection of XJBSMV by enhancing TGB1 and TGB3 protein interactions

Previous studies have shown that BSMV spreads from cell to cell through the co-ordinated actions of TGB proteins, which co-localize at the cell wall in close association with PD, during cell-to-cell movement in monocots and dicots (Lim et al., 2008). Our results shown above demonstrated that interference with CK2 phosphorylation at the XJTGB1 Thr-395 and Thr-401 sites affected XJBSMV local and systemic movement. TGB1 is a multifunctional protein that engages in homologous interactions and formation of a ribonucleoprotein complex containing viral genomic and subgenomic RNAs (Lawrence and Jackson, 2001). Therefore, we used three approaches to identify XJTGB1 protein functions affected by CK2 phosphorylation.

To determine whether the RNA-binding affinity of the XJTGB1 protein changed upon phosphorylation, we first used purified wt XJTGB1 and the double mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A proteins in EMSA with DIG-labelled RNA transcripts (Fig. 7A). The results clearly showed that both proteins bound almost all of the available RNA at 250ng, indicating that the mutant protein did not affect RNA-binding activities (Fig. 7A, panels 1 and 2). Next, to determine phosphorylation effects directly, the XJTGB1 protein was incubated in phosphorylation assay buffer containing unlabelled ATP, with and without the addition of purified NbCK2α, and EMSA assays were performed to compare the abilities of the non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated XJTGB1 proteins to bind the labelled RNA transcripts (Fig. 7A, panels 3 and 4). In addition, the RNA-binding activities of the phosphorylated wt XJTGB1 and mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A proteins were compared, but the XJTGB1T395A/T401A protein was found to retain almost the same level of RNA binding as the wt XJTGB1 protein (Fig. 7A, panels 5 and 6). Hence, phosphorylation appeared to have little, if any, effect on the RNA-binding activities of the XJTGB1 protein.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Effect of XJTGB1 protein phosphorylation mutants on its functions. (A) Comparison of RNA binding by the phosphorylated native XJTGB1 and double-mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A proteins. (B) GST affinity chromatography comparisons of the XJTGB1 and double-mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A proteins with the GST:XJTGB3 protein. The concentrations of the TGB proteins were similar in the experiments, but the XJTGB1T395A/T401A protein had approximate 40% TGB3 protein-binding efficiency compared with the wt XJTGB1 protein. The illustrated binding result is typical of three independent experiments. (C) Co-localization of TGB proteins. Confocal laser-scanning microscopy observation of N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells co-infiltrated with mixtures of Agrobacterium harbouring GFP:XJTGB1 or the GFP:XJTGB1T395A/T401A mutant derivatives and the pGD-TGB2 and RFP:TGB3 plasmids. Bars, 50 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

To evaluate the possible role of phosphorylation in heterologous interactions of XJTGB1 and XJTGB3 proteins, experiments were carried out with His-tagged XJTGB1 and its mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A fusion proteins in co-expressions with the GST:XJTGB3 protein in E. coli BL21 cells. Both XJTGB1 and XJTGB1T395A/T401A proteins were retained to some extent on the affinity columns by the GST:XJTGB3 protein (Fig. 7B), but our three experiments consistently showed that the XJTGB1T395A/T401A protein bound the TGB3 protein approximate 40% less effectively than the XJTGB1 protein. These results thus suggested that the mutant XJTGB1T395A/T401A may weaken TGB1:TGB3 protein interactions and result in impaired cell-to-cell movement functions of XJBSMV.

In additional attempts to ascertain whether the compromised TGB1:TGB3 protein interactions or CK2 phosphorylation affected localization of TGB proteins in plant cells, co-localization assays were performed by transient expression of the three TGB proteins via agroinfiltration in N. benthamiana, and GFP and RFP localizations were evaluated at 2 dpi by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. The results revealed that TGB2 and TGB3, the XJTGB1T395A/T401A protein, and the wt XJTGB1 protein had similar TGB localization patterns (Fig. 7C). Taken together, we conclude that phosphorylation promotes XJBSMV infection by enhancing the interactions between the XJTGB1 and XJTGB3 proteins, although this effect was not sufficient to substantially alter the TGB localization patterns visible by confocal microscopy.

Discussion

Reversible phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins have regulatory roles in a wide range of cellular processes, including cell signalling transduction (Moreno-Romero et al., 2011), protein subcellular localization (Nardozzi et al., 2010), and protein–protein (Trott et al., 2001) and protein–nucleic acid interactions (Schuck et al., 2013). Numerous proteins with distinct phosphorylation sites have been investigated, and protein kinases affecting a wide range of cellular responses have been characterized (Peck, 2006; Ubersax and Ferrell, 2007; Bond et al., 2011; Dissmeyer and Schnittger, 2011). A growing body of evidence now shows that viral proteins with different functions are phosphorylated by various protein kinases during infection. These include CK2, PKA, PKC, and CK1 protein kinases (Lee and Lucas, 2001; Link et al., 2011; Makarov et al., 2012; Hung et al., 2014), and among these kinases, CK2 phosphorylation effects on infectivity have been most extensively studied.

Protein kinase CK2, a conserved Ser/Thr kinase existing in almost all eukaryotes, phosphorylates proteins with a consensus phosphorylation site motif (S/T-D/E-X-E/D, where X is any residue) (Ubersax and Ferrell, 2007). Increasing evidence indicates that CK2 protein phosphorylation has important roles in plant growth and development (Mulekar et al., 2012), and that CK2 also regulates virus infection processes, including virion assembly, cell-to-cell and long-distance movement, and interactions between viral proteins and other host proteins (Jakubiec and Jupin, 2007; Nardozzi et al., 2010). In addition to the MP phosphorylation effects mentioned in the Introduction, phosphorylation of cucumber mosaic virus, cucumber necrosis virus, and turnip yellow mosaic virus RdRp has substantial effects on virus replication (Kim et al., 2002; Shapka et al., 2005; Stork et al., 2005; Jakubiec et al., 2006; Jakubiec and Jupin, 2007). Ser/Thr phosphorylation has also been suggested to affect the CP functions of several plant viruses. For example, phosphorylation of potato virus A (PVA) CP by host CK2 inhibits viral RNA binding in vitro, and mutation of a major phosphorylation CP site generates a PVA variant that is defective in cell-to-cell and long-distance movement (Ivanov et al., 2001, 2003). In addition, phosphorylation of the cauliflower mosaic virus CP precursor at several sites by CK2 is important for virus infectivity and symptom development (Chapdelaine et al., 2002). Phosphorylation of the bamboo mosaic virus CP by CK2 also regulates cell-to-cell movement by modulating RNA binding (Hung et al., 2014).

Although phosphorylation of the PSLV N-terminal portion of the TGB1 protein has been reported (Makarov et al., 2012), but the results were not extended to evaluate the roles of phosphorylation in PSLV movement processes. Our results now demonstrate that the BSMV TGB1 protein is phosphorylated by CK2 in vitro and in planta, and that the phosphorylation events affect virus movement. Although the prediction programs we used suggest that the XJTGB1Thr-395 residue in the 395 TDYD398 site is more likely to be a conserved CK2 phosphorylation site than the Thr-401 (401 TDET404) site (Meggio and Pinna, 2003), it is noteworthy that Thr-401 localizes within an acidic residue-rich region (399GETDETEK406) that may be more favourable for phosphorylation (Battistutta et al., 2000; Riera et al., 2001) than the Thr-395 residue. Thus, based on the in vitro phosphorylation assays of the TGB1 mutant derivatives, as well as results derived from LC-MS/MS analysis, we conclude that Thr-401 is the major TGB1 phosphorylation site and that Thr-395 functions as a CK2 docking site and has a more limited phosphorylation role. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that a plant viral protein, which can be phosphorylated by CK2, has a CK2 docking site adjacent to the phosphorylation site.

To determine the effects of XJTGB1 Thr-395 and Thr-401 phosphorylation on virulence, point mutations were introduced into the XJBSMV clone. Infectivity results in the monocot and dicot hosts revealed that the mutant derivatives differed in their systemic movement phenotypes. For example, the T395A mutant was the only derivative able to infect N. benthamiana, barley, and wheat systemically, but the T395E, T401A, and T401E mutants also systemically infected the monocot hosts (Fig. 5). Our results suggest that the mutants may be compromised by partial disruption of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation dynamics in TGB1 in ways that contribute to diminished cell-to-cell movement. However, the amino acid structures of the T395A, T395D, T395E, T401D, and T401E substitutions are not entirely consistent with this simplistic model, as it is obvious that the substituted amino acids differ in the sizes of their side chains and their charges. Moreover, we cannot exclude the possibility that ‘off-site’ phosphorylation of Thr-395 or phosphorylation by kinases other than CK2 may be elicited by the substitutions and that these events may contribute to protein modifications that affect local and vascular movement.

Hordeivirus TGB1 proteins are multifunctional and contain two positively charged regions rich in lysine (K) and arginine (R) residues at the N-terminal half of the protein and a C-terminal region consisting of seven conserved motifs (I, IA, II, III, IV, V, and VI) (Jackson et al., 2009). The Thr-395 and Thr-401 sites are located between domain IV and V of the TGB1 protein and are not included in the most highly conserved regions. The hordeivirus TGB1 proteins have multiple ssRNA- and dsRNA-binding sites, and hence mutagenesis of single or closely associated XJTGB1 protein sites may not have obvious effects on RNA-binding activities in vitro.

We have shown previously that the BSMV TGB1 protein is the major protein component of ribonucleoprotein complexes involved in BSMV cell-to-cell movement. TGB1 also participates in interactions of TGB1 and TGB3 proteins during intra- and intercellular virus movement, and functions in TGB1:TGB3 interactions that recruit the TGB2 protein during transport through PD to adjacent cells (Jackson et al., 2009). These interactions are critical for movement because TGB3 serves as a bridge to direct TGB co-localization at the cell wall and to establish close associations with the PD (Lim et al., 2009). Even though both CK2 phosphorylation sites (T395A/T401A) in XJTGB1 were mutated simultaneously, the mutant TGB1 protein did not elicit obvious changes in subcellular localization patterns (Fig. 7C). However, the XJTGB1T395A/T401A protein did reduce binding affinity to the TGB3 protein compared with the wt TGB1 protein. Therefore, our results provide evidence that CK2 phosphorylation of TGB1 affects BSMV movement by modulating TGB1:TGB3 protein interactions.

In summary, our results shown here provide evidence showing that phosphorylation of the BSMV XJTGB1 protein by CK2 at C-terminal residues affects cell-to-cell movement and the systemic infection phenotype. Moreover, the mutant results are compatible with a model whereby modulation of TGB1:TGB3 interactions contribute to phenotypic differences with in BSMV movement in monocot and dicot hosts. Compared with the TGB1 proteins of other hordeiviruses (Supplementary Fig. S2A, available at JXB online), Thr-401 but not Thr-395 is conserved in PSLV TGB1 and BSMV TGB1. This implies that the proposed docking site function of Thr-395 may be unique for BSMV phosphorylation. Furthermore, multiple sequence alignments of TGB1 proteins (Supplementary Fig. S2B) showed that the Thr-395 and Thr-401 sites are highly conserved among six sequenced BSMV strains, suggesting that phosphorylation of the TGB1 protein is required during infection of all BSMV strains.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Phosphorylation predictions of the XJTGB1 protein by the GPS 2.1 program (A) and the Scansite Motif Scanner online server (B).

Supplementary Fig. S2. Alignment of the TGB1 proteins of the hordeiviruses (A) and among six sequenced BSMV strains (B).

Supplementary Table S1. Primers used in construction and analysis of biologically active BSMV Xinjiang cDNA clones.

Supplementary Table S2. Primers used for site-specific mutagenesis of Xinjiang RNAβ clones.

Supplementary Table S3. Sequence alignment of Xinjiang strain RNAα with different BSMV strains.

Supplementary Table S4. Sequence alignment of Xinjiang strain RNAβ with different BSMV strains.

Supplementary Table S5. Sequence alignment of Xinjiang strain RNAγ with different BSMV strains.

Supplementary Table S6. Systemic infectivity efficiency of XJBSMV TGB1 phosphorylation mutants on dicot and monocot hosts.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Yau-Heiu Hsu (National Chung Hsing University) for kindly providing the details of the protocol for in vitro phosphorylation assays, Professor A. L.N. Rao (University of California, Riverside) for providing the pCass4-Rz vector, Professors Dongtao Ren, Qun He, and Huiqiang Lou (China Agricultural University) for helpful suggestions and constructive criticism, and Dr Zhen Li and Jingqiang Zhang (The Mass Spectrometry Facility, CAU) for technical assistance in LC-MS/MS. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270184) and the Project for Extramural Scientists of SKLAB (2012SKLAB06-02).

Glossary

Abbreviations:

BSMV

barley stripe mosaic virus

CP

coat protein

DIG

digoxygenin

dpi

d post-inoculation

EMSA

electrophoretic mobility shift assays

GFP

green fluorescent protein

LC-MS/MS

liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

MP

movement protein

ORF

open reading frame

PD

plasmodesmata

PSLV

Poa semilatent virus

RdRp

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

RFP

red fluorescent protein

RT-PCR

reverse transcription-PCR

TGB

triple gene block

TMV

tobacco mosaic virus.

References

  1. Akamatsu N, Takeda A, Kishimoto M, Kaido M, Okuno T, Mise K. 2007. Phosphorylation and interaction of the movement and coat proteins of brome mosaic virus in infected barley protoplasts. Archives of Virology 152, 2087–2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Annamalai P, Rao ALN. 2005. Replication-independent expression of genome components and capsid protein of Brome mosaic virus in planta: a functional role for viral replicase in RNA packaging. Virology 338, 96–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battistutta R, Sarno S, De Moliner E, Marin O, Issinger O-G, Zanotti G, Pinna LA. 2000. The crystal structure of the complex of Zea mays α subunit with a fragment of human β subunit provides the clue to the architecture of protein kinase CK2 holoenzyme. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 5184–5190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bombarely A, Rosli HG, Vrebalov J, Moffett P, Mueller LA, Martin GB. 2012. A draft genome sequence of Nicotiana benthamiana to enhance molecular plant–microbe biology research. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 25, 1523–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bond AE, Row PE, Dudley E. 2011. Post-translation modification of proteins; methodologies and applications in plant sciences. Phytochemistry 72, 975–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bragg JN, Lim HS, Jackson AO. 2008. Hordeivirus. In: Mahy BWJ, Regenmortel MHV, eds. Encyclopedia of Virology. Oxford: Academic Press, 459–467. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapdelaine Y, Kirk D, Karsies A, Hohn T, Leclerc D. 2002. Mutation of capsid protein phosphorylation sites abolishes Cauliflower mosaic virus infectivity. Journal of Virology 76, 11748–11752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Citovsky V, McLean BG, Zupan JR, Zambryski P. 1993. Phosphorylation of Tobacco mosaic virus cell-to-cell movement protein by a developmentally regulated plant cell wall-associated protein kinase. Genes & Development 7, 904–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cui Y, Lee MY, Huo N, et al. 2012. Fine mapping of the Bsr1 barley stripe mosaic virus resistance gene in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon . PLOS ONE 7, e38333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dissmeyer N, Schnittger A. 2011. The age of protein kinases. In: Dissmeyer N, Schnittger A, eds. Plant kinases: methods and protocols , vol. 779 New York: Humana Press, 7–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donald RG, Lawrence DM, Jackson AO. 1997. The barley stripe mosaic virus 58-kilodalton βb protein is a multifunctional RNA binding protein. Journal of Virology 71, 1538–1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guan K, Dixon JE. 1991. Eukaryotic proteins expressed in Escherichia coli: an improved thrombin cleavage and purification procedure of fusion proteins with glutathione S-transferase. Analytical Biochemistry 192, 262–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hung CJ, Huang YW, Liou MR, Lee YC, Lin NS, Meng M, Tsai CH, Hu CC, Hsu YH. 2014. Phosphorylation of coat protein by protein kinase CK2 regulates cell-to-cell movement of Bamboo mosaic virus through modulating RNA binding. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 27, 1211–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivanov KI, Puustinen P, Gabrenaite R, Vihinen H, Rönnstrand L, Valmu L, Kalkkinen N, Mäkinen K. 2003. Phosphorylation of the potyvirus capsid protein by protein kinase CK2 and its relevance for virus infection. The Plant Cell 15, 2124–2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ivanov KI, Puustinen P, Merits A, Saarma M, Mäkinen K. 2001. Phosphorylation down-regulates the RNA binding function of the coat protein of potato virus A. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 13530–13540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson AO, Lim H-S, Bragg J, Ganesan U, Lee MY. 2009. Hordeivirus replication, movement, and pathogenesis. Annual Review of Phytopathology 47, 385–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jakubiec A, Jupin I. 2007. Regulation of positive-strand RNA virus replication: the emerging role of phosphorylation. Virus Research 129, 73–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jakubiec A, Tournier V, Drugeon G, Pflieger S, Camborde L, Vinh J, Hericourt F, Redeker V, Jupin I. 2006. Phosphorylation of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and its role in replication of a plus-strand RNA virus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 21236–21249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karger EM, Frolova OY, Fedorova NV, Baratova LA, Ovchinnikova TV, Susi P, Makinen K, Ronnstrand L, Dorokhov YL, Atabekov JG. 2003. Dysfunctionality of a tobacco mosaic virus movement protein mutant mimicking threonine 104 phosphorylation. Journal of General Virology 84, 727–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kato K, Kidou S, Miura H. 2008. Molecular cloning and mapping of casein kinase 2α and β subunit genes in barley. Genome 51, 208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kawakami S, Hori K, Hosokawa D, Okada Y, Watanabe Y. 2003. Defective tobamovirus movement protein lacking wild-type phosphorylation sites can be complemented by substitutions found in revertants. Journal of Virology 77, 1452–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim SH, Palukaitis P, Park YI. 2002. Phosphorylation of cucumber mosaic virus RNA polymerase 2a protein inhibits formation of replicase complex. EMBO Journal 21, 2292–2300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kleinow T, Nischang M, Beck A, Kratzer U, Tanwir F, Preiss W, Kepp G, Jeske H. 2009. Three C-terminal phosphorylation sites in the Abutilon mosaic virus movement protein affect symptom development and viral DNA accumulation. Virology 390, 89–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lawrence DM, Jackson AO. 2001. Interactions of the TGB1 protein during cell-to-cell movement of Barley stripe mosaic virus . Journal of Virology 75, 8712–8723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee J-Y, Lucas WJ. 2001. Phosphorylation of viral movement proteins: regulation of cell-to-cell trafficking. Trends in Microbiology 9, 5–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee J-Y, Taoka K-i, Yoo B-C, Ben-Nissan G, Kim D-J, Lucas WJ. 2005. Plasmodesmal-associated protein kinase in tobacco and Arabidopsis recognizes a subset of non-cell-autonomous proteins. The Plant Cell 17, 2817–2831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee MY, Yan L, Gorter FA, et al. 2012. Brachypodium distachyon line Bd3-1 resistance is elicited by the barley stripe mosaic virus triple gene block 1 movement protein. Journal of General Virology 93, 2729–2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lim H-S, Bragg JN, Ganesan U, Lawrence DM, Yu J, Isogai M, Hammond J, Jackson AO. 2008. Triple gene block protein interactions involved in movement of Barley stripe mosaic virus . Journal of Virology 82, 4991–5006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lim H-S, Bragg JN, Ganesan U, Ruzin S, Schichnes D, Lee MY, Vaira AM, Ryu KH, Hammond J, Jackson AO. 2009. Subcellular localization of the Barley stripe mosaic virus triple gene block proteins. Journal of Virology 83, 9432–9448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Link K, Vogel F, Sonnewald U. 2011. PD trafficking of potato leaf roll virus movement protein in Arabidopsis depends on site-specific protein phosphorylation. Frontiers in Plant Science 2, 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Makarov VV, Iconnikova AY, Guseinov MA, Vishnichenko VK, Kalinina NO. 2012. In vitro phosphorylation of the N-terminal half of hordeivirus movement protein. Biochemistry (Moscow) 77, 1072–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matsushita Y, Hanazawa K, Yoshioka K, Oguchi T, Kawakami S, Watanabe Y, Nishiguchi M, Nyunoya H. 2000. In vitro phosphorylation of the movement protein of tomato mosaic tobamovirus by a cellular kinase. Journal of General Virology 81, 2095–2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matsushita Y, Ohshima M, Yoshioka K, Nishiguchi M, Nyunoya H. 2003. The catalytic subunit of protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates in vitro the movement protein of Tomato mosaic virus . Journal of General Virology 84, 497–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Matsushita Y, Yoshioka K, Shigyo T, Takahashi H, Nyunoya H. 2002. Phosphorylation of the movement protein of Cucumber mosaic virus in transgenic tobacco plants. Virus Genes 24, 231–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McKinney HH, Greeley LW. 1965. Biological characteristics of barley stripe-mosaic virus strains and their evolution . Technical Bulletin, No. 1324. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  36. Meggio F, Pinna LA. 2003. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB Journal 17, 349–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Módena NA, Zelada AM, Conte F, Mentaberry A. 2008. Phosphorylation of the TGBp1 movement protein of Potato virus X by a Nicotiana tabacum CK2-like activity. Virus Research 137, 16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moreno-Romero J, Armengot L, Marquès-Bueno M, Cadavid-Ordóñez M, Martínez M. 2011. About the role of CK2 in plant signal transduction. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 356, 233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Morozov SY, Solovyev AG. 2003. Triple gene block: modular design of a multifunctional machine for plant virus movement. Journal of General Virology 84, 1351–1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mulekar JJ, Bu Q, Chen F, Huq E. 2012. Casein kinase II α subunits affect multiple developmental and stress-responsive pathways in Arabidopsis . The Plant Journal 69, 343–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nardozzi J, Lott K, Cingolani G. 2010. Phosphorylation meets nuclear import: a review. Cell Communication and Signaling 8, 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Niefind K, Putter M, Guerra B, Issinger O-G, Schomburg D. 1999. GTP plus water mimic ATP in the active site of protein kinase CK2. Nature Structural Biology 6, 1100–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Obenauer JC. 2003. Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Research 31, 3635–3641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Peck SC. 2006. Analysis of protein phosphorylation: methods and strategies for studying kinases and substrates. The Plant Journal 45, 512–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Petty ITD, Hunter BG, Wei N, Jackson AO. 1989. Infectious barley stripe mosaic virus RNA transcribed in vitro from full-length genomic cDNA clones. Virology 171, 342–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Riera M, Peracchia G, De Nadal E, Ariño J, Pagès M. 2001. Maize protein kinase CK2: regulation and functionality of three β regulatory subunits. The Plant Journal 25, 365–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rubio V, Shen Y, Saijo Y, Liu Y, Gusmaroli G, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Deng XW. 2005. An alternative tandem affinity purification strategy applied to Arabidopsis protein complex isolation. The Plant Journal 41, 767–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Salinas P, Bantignies B, Tapia J, Jordana X, Holuigue L. 2001. Cloning and characterization of the cDNA coding for the catalytic α subunit of CK2 from tobacco. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 227, 129–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sambrook J, Russell D. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Samuilova O, Santala J, Valkonen JPT. 2013. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the triple gene block protein 3 regulates cell-to-cell movement and protein interactions of Potato mop-top virus . Journal of Virology 87, 4313–4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sato K, Yoshikawa N, Takahashi T, Taira H. 1995. Expression, subcellular location and modification of the 50kDa protein encoded by ORF2 of the apple chlorotic leaf spot trichovirus genome. Journal of General Virology 76, 1503–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schuck S, Ruse C, Stenlund A. 2013. CK2 phosphorylation inactivates DNA binding by the papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins. Journal of Virology 87, 7668–7679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shapka N, Stork J, Nagy PD. 2005. Phosphorylation of the p33 replication protein of Cucumber necrosis tombusvirus adjacent to the RNA binding site affects viral RNA replication. Virology 343, 65–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith O, Clapham A, Rose P, Liu Y, Wang J, Allaby RG. 2014. A complete ancient RNA genome: identification, reconstruction and evolutionary history of archaeological barley stripe mosaic virus. Scientific Reports 4, 4003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stork J, Panaviene Z, Nagy PD. 2005. Inhibition of in vitro RNA binding and replicase activity by phosphorylation of the p33 replication protein of Cucumber necrosis tombusvirus . Virology 343, 79–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Trott RL, Kalive M, Karandikar U, Rummer R, Bishop CP, Bidwai AP. 2001. Identification and characterization of proteins that interact with Drosophila melanogaster protein kinase CK2. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 227, 91–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ubersax JA, Ferrell Jr JE. 2007. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 530–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Verchot-Lubicz J, Torrance L, Solovyev AG, Morozov SY, Jackson AO, Gilmer D. 2010. Varied movement strategies employed by triple gene block-encoding viruses. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 23, 1231–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vijayapalani P, Chen JC-F, Liou M-R, Chen H-C, Hsu Y-H, Lin N-S. 2012. Phosphorylation of Bamboo mosaic virus satellite RNA (satBaMV)-encoded protein P20 downregulates the formation of satBaMV-P20 ribonucleoprotein complex. Nucleic Acids Research 40, 638–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Waigmann E, Chen M-H, Bachmaier R, Ghoshroy S, Citovsky V. 2000. Regulation of plasmodesmal transport by phosphorylation of tobacco mosaic virus cell-to-cell movement protein. EMBO Journal 19, 4875–4884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wu J, Li J, Mao X, Wang W, Cheng Z, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Tao X. 2013. Viroplasm protein P9-1 of Rice black-streaked dwarf virus preferentially binds to single-stranded RNA in its octamer form, and the central interior structure formed by this octamer constitutes the major RNA binding site. Journal of Virology 87, 12885–12899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Xie H, Wang Z, Li W, Ni S. 1981. Occurrence of barley stripe mosaic virus in Xinjiang. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica 11, 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  63. Xue Y, Liu Z, Cao J, Ma Q, Gao X, Wang Q, Jin C, Zhou Y, Wen L, Ren J. 2011. GPS 2.1: enhanced prediction of kinase-specific phosphorylation sites with an algorithm of motif length selection. Protein Engineering Design and Selection 24, 255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yuan C, Li C, Yan L, Jackson AO, Liu Z, Han C, Yu J, Li D. 2011. A high throughput Barley stripe mosaic virus vector for virus induced gene silencing in monocots and dicots. PLOS ONE 6, e26468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES