Colonization of the stomach with Helicobacter pylori can contribute to the development of gastric ulcers and stomach cancer. The typical treatment course for H pylori infection is a proton pump inhibitor in addition to at least two antibiotics. Increasing resistance to these antibiotics has led to a considerable decline in the eradication rate following treatment over the past several years. The purpose of this study was to assess the rates of resistance to several of the antibiotics commonly used to treat H pylori infection, by investigating a population of patients presenting to a single health care facility in Sudbury, Ontario. Multiple methods were used to assess antibiotic resistance.
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility, Helicobacter pylori, Northern Ontario, Resistance
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Helicobacter pylori plays a significant role in gastritis and ulcers. It is a carcinogen as defined by the WHO, and infection can result in adenocarcinomas and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas. In Canada, rates of antimicrobial resistance are relatively unknown, with very few studies conducted in the past 15 years.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine rates of resistance in Sudbury, Ontario, compare antimicrobial susceptibility methods and attempt to determine the molecular basis of antibiotic resistance.
METHODS:
Patients attending scheduled visits at Health Sciences North (Sudbury, Ontario) provided gastric biopsy samples on a volunteer basis. In total, 20 H pylori isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (on amoxicillin, tetracycline, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and clarithromycin) was conducted using disk diffusion and E-test methods. Subsequently, genomic DNA from these isolates was sequenced to detect mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance.
RESULTS:
Sixty-five percent of the isolates were found to be resistant to at least one of the listed antibiotics according to E-test. Three isolates were found to be resistant to ≥3 of the above-mentioned antibiotics. Notably, 25% of the isolates were found to be resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin, two antibiotics that are normally prescribed as part of first-line regimens in the treatment of H pylori infections in Canada and most of the world. Among the resistant strains, the sequences of 23S ribosomal RNA and gyrA, which are linked to clarithromycin and ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin resistance, respectively, revealed the presence of known point mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance.
CONCLUSIONS:
In general, resistance to metronidazole, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin and clarithromycin has increased since the studies in the early 2000s. These results suggest that surveillance programs of H pylori antibiotic resistance may need to be revisited or improved to prevent antimicrobial therapy failure.
Abstract
HISTORIQUE :
L’Helicobacter pylori contribue énormément à la gastrite et aux ulcères. L’OMS le définit comme un cancérigène, et l’infection peut provoquer l’apparition d’adénocarcinomes et de lymphomes de tissus lymphoïdes associés aux muqueuses. Au Canada, on connaît relativement peu les taux de résistance antimicrobienne, car très peu d’études ont été réalisées sur le sujet depuis 15 ans.
OBJECTIF :
Examiner les taux de résistance à Sudbury, en Ontario, comparer les méthodes de susceptibilité antimicrobienne et tenter de déterminer le fondement biologique de la résistance antibiotique.
MÉTHODOLOGIE :
Les patients qui allaient à un rendez-vous prévu au Health Sciences North de Sudbury ont remis les résultats de biopsies gastriques sur une base volontaire. Au total, 20 isolats de H pylori ont été recueillis, et les tests de susceptibilité antimicrobienne (à l’amoxicilline, à la tétracycline, au métronidazole, à la ciprofloxacine, à la lévofloxacine et à la clarithromycine) ont été effectués au moyen de la diffusion sur disque et de l’essai E. L’ADN génomique de ces isolats a ensuite été séquencé pour déceler les mutations associées à la résistance antimicrobienne.
RÉSULTATS :
Selon l’essai E, 65 % des isolats étaient résistants à au moins un des antibiotiques énumérés. Notamment, 25 % des isolats étaient résistants à la fois au métronidazole et à la clarithromycine, tous deux normalement prescrits en première ligne pour traiter les infections à H pylori au Canada et dans la plupart des régions du monde. Parmi les souches résistantes, les séquences d’ARN ribosomique 23S et de gyrA, qui sont liées à la résistance à la clarithromycine et à la ciprofloxacine-lévofloxacine, respectivement, révélaient la présence de mutations de points connus associés à une résistance antimicrobienne.
CONCLUSIONS :
En général, la résistance au métronidazole, à la ciprofloxacine-lévofloxacine et à la clarithromycine a augmenté depuis les études réalisées au début des années 2000. D’après ces résultats, il faudra peut-être revoir ou améliorer les programmes de surveillance de l’antibiorésistance au H pylori pour prévenir l’échec du traitement antimicrobien.
Helicobacter pylori is a bacterial human pathogen that preferentially colonizes the stomach and is found in 50% of the world’s population, causing dyspepsia, gastritis and peptic ulcers (1). The WHO has classified this organism as a class I carcinogen that can cause stomach cancers, which, after diagnosis, has only a 27% survival rate (2–4). In Canada, the prevalence of H pylori is approximately 20% to 30% (5,6). However, in developing countries, rates can be as high as 80% (7). As of 2007, the incidence in the province of Ontario was approximately 23%, with men twice as likely to be infected as women (29.4% versus 14.9%) (5). Infection is strongly correlated with crowding, smoking, diet and poor sanitation (8–11). Unfortunately, such conditions exist within the most vulnerable populations in Canada; specifically, some First Nations communities have demonstrated rates as high as 95% (12).
Eradication of H pylori is dependent on successful treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), such as omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, and at least two antibiotics among clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MTZ), amoxicillin (AMX) and tetracycline (TET) (13–16). In Canada, one of the standard recommended first-line regimens is a triple therapy consisting of a PPI, CLR, and either AMX or MTZ for up to 14 days (17). Alternatively, a quadruple regimen including a PPI, bismuth, MTZ and TET for up to 14 days may be required (18). Initially, both regimens had eradication rates >90% in 2000 (19), but this had dropped to 70% 10 years later (20), well below the recommended 80% outlined by Maastricht IV guidelines (21). A major contributor to the decline in efficacy is the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance through selection, mutation and the development of emerging efflux pumps. This compels the necessity of susceptibility testing to manage the infection effectively (13). In one study, nearly 50% of patients in Germany were unable to eradicate H pylori because of resistance to both CLR and MTZ (22). In another study, nitroimidazole resistance was a contributing factor of eradication rates dropping by 15% to 50% (23). A recent study evaluated whether a new regimen of AMX plus a high dose of lansoprazole can achieve ≥90% eradication of H pylori (24). It was believed that the high PPI dose could affect the stomach environment and increase antimicrobial susceptibility; however, the desired eradication rate was not achieved. With mounting evidence that antimicrobial resistance affects clinical outcomes, there is a need to place more emphasis on a surveillance program to monitor resistance to guide the treatment of H pylori infections.
One of the mechanisms by which H pylori acquires resistance to antibiotics is through vertical transmission of mutations. For example, it is well documented that CLR resistance is linked to point mutations at nucleotide A2142 and A2143 in the 23S ribosomal (r)RNA gene (rrn) (25,26). Resistance to TETs were observed when all three nucleotides at positions 926 to 928 of the 16S rRNA gene were mutated (27,28). However, determining whether newly discovered mutations are responsible for antimicrobial resistance is a challenging task. Care must be taken because several mutations can appear in any given gene, and only through methodical evaluation (eg, site-directed mutagenesis of a susceptible wild-type H pylori strain) can a proper conclusion be made about a particular mutation leading to resistance.
Recent reporting of H pylori in Canada has been sporadic, with the most recent comprehensive epidemiological analyses on prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in Canada as a whole being published in 2000 (29) and 2004 (30). More recently, a study in the Arctic region of Canada has examined rates of antimicrobial resistance in an Aboriginal community in Aklavik, Northwest Territories (31). Additionally, there was a report in 2007 about the prevalence of H pylori in Ontario (5), and in a First Nations community in Sioux Lookout in Northwestern Ontario (32). In 1998, studies in Alberta showed that MTZ resistance was 14%, while CLR resistance was 3% (33). While it is currently unknown how H pylori has progressed in prevalence or whether antimicrobial resistance has increased across Canada, H pylori resistance to CLR across Europe doubled from 9% to 18% between 1998 and 2008, suggesting that antimicrobial resistance has increased globally (21).
The present pilot study provides a small glimpse into H pylori antimicrobial susceptibility in Northeastern Ontario by examining rates of antibiotic resistance for patients who attended Health Sciences North (HSN) in Sudbury, Ontario, for care. Different methods to determine antimicrobial resistance are compared and molecular detection of mutations known to be associated with antibiotic resistance are examined. Our introductory findings show increased local rates of antimicrobial resistance. As such, the extent of rising antimicrobial resistance rates of H pylori should be examined nationally and internationally as a means to prevent further treatment failure.
METHODS
Gastric biopsy collection, processing and culturing of H pylori
The HSN Research Ethics Board in Sudbury, Ontario, approved the research protocol. Patients who were scheduled for gastroscopies as part of their regular health care were asked for informed consent to collect blood and additional biopsy samples for the present study. In total, 301 patients were recruited to the study (117 men and 184 women); 127 participants were ≥60 years of age. Demographically, 280 identified themselves as Caucasian, 18 as First Nations, two as of African descent and one as of Indian descent. At HSN, gastric biopsies are typically sent for histology to identify Helicobacter-like organisms using Giemsa staining. Presence of these organisms would then prompt physicians to prescribe standard levels of treatment with a follow-up later. Physicians in the endoscopy unit who participated in the present study extracted additional biopsies and placed them into tubes containing transport medium consisting of thioglycollate medium (Oxoid, Canada), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. To increase the likelihood of recovering H pylori, the biopsies were processed within 20 min of biopsy collection (E Altman, National Research Council of Canada, personal communication).
Briefly, biopsies were ground between two glass slides to break up the tissue and then plated on Columbia blood agar (BD Difco, USA) supplemented with a final concentration of 7% defibrinated horse blood (Quelab, Canada) and antibiotics (Sigma-Aldrich, Canada) as previously described (34). The plates were then placed into the Invivo2 500 Hypoxia Workstation (Ruskinn Technology Ltd, United Kingdom) at 37°C under microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2) for a minimum of 48 h to two weeks to facilitate the culture of H pylori. Colonies were streaked for isolation on fresh media and subsequently cultured under the same conditions for 48 h to 72 h. When sufficient growth had occurred, samples were prepared for storage in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BD Difco) supplemented with 20% glycerol (Fisher Scientific, Canada) at −80°C. Enough bacteria were resuspended to cause turbidity in the freezing media. H pylori isolates were minimally cultured (two to five times due to varying rates of growth) to prevent the introduction of mutations under selective pressure.
Biochemical and polymerase chain reaction identification of H pylori
A KOH test was performed to rapidly determine whether isolated bacteria were Gram negative (35). A small amount of bacteria on a loop was added to a drop of 3% KOH (Sigma-Aldrich, Canada) on a microscope slide. A positive reaction (ie, Gram negative) was indicated if the mixture became viscous within 30 s and a string of the mixture was observed by raising the loop approximately 1 cm from the slide.
H pylori colonies were identified by positive catalase, urease and oxidase tests as previously described (36). Catalase was determined to be present if a drop of 3% H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) on a slide with bacteria led to effervescence. A urease test was considered to be positive if bacteria introduced in a solution of Brucella broth (BD Difco), urea (Sigma-Aldrich) and phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) at pH 6.8 to 7.0 (yellow colour) turned pink or red within 24 h. Finally, a positive reaction for oxidase was indicated when bacteria smeared on filter paper dampened with N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Kovacs reagent, Sigma) left a purple colour on the filter paper.
The identity of H pylori was confirmed and further characterized by amplifying 16S rRNA, cagA, ureC and ureA, with primers listed in Table 1 using the Multiplex PCR Kit (Qiagen, Canada) as per the manufacturer’s instructions in the VapoProtect gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf, Canada). Expected size amplicon lengths of 522, 294, 400 and 411 base pairs, respectively, were resolved on a 2% agarose gel using the PowerPac HC (BioRad, Canada).
TABLE 1.
Primers used for polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA | GCTAAGAGATCAGCCTATGTCC TGGCAATCAGCGTCAGGTAATG |
71 |
| cagA | AATACACCAACGCCTCCAAG TTGTTGCCGCTTTTGCTCTC |
72 |
| ureC | AAGCTTTTAGGGGTGTTAGGGGTTT AAGCTTACTTTCTAACACTAACGC |
73 |
| ureA | GCCAATGGTAAATTAGTT CTCCTTAATTGTTTTTAC |
74 |
rRNA Ribosomal RNA
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using two methods (disk diffusion and E-test). Colonies from two- to three-day-old pure culture of H pylori, grown on nonselective Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (BD Difco) plates and supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (Quelab), were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline to a McFarland standard of 2 (approximately 6×108 cfu/mL) for the disk diffusion testing, and a standard of 3 (approximately 1.0×109 cfu/mL) for the E-test. H pylori 26695 was used as a negative control because the strain is susceptible to all of the antibiotics tested in the present study (37,38).
The disk diffusion test followed the guidelines as set out by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), April 2013, for microaerophilic bacteria (39). Bacterial suspensions were applied to the MH blood agar plates using a sterile cotton swab within 30 min, and the antibiotic disks were applied within 15 min on three separate occasions and averaged. The plates were incubated in the microaerophilic chamber at 37°C for three days, at which time the zones of inhibition were measured in millimetres. The disks (Oxoid) used were AMX (10 μg/disk), CLR (15 μg/disk), TET (30 μg/disk), MTZ (5 μg/disk), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg/disk), and levofloxacin (LVX; 5 μg/disk) as suggested by EUCAST and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards for antibiotic content. Resistance was determined when zones of inhibition were ≤25 mm for AMX, ≤30 mm for CLR and TET, ≤16 mm for MTZ (39), and ≤30 mm for CIP (40) and LVX (41).
For the E-test, the same inoculation procedure was applied except with the use of a 3 McFarland standard. Each E-test strip (BioMérieux, Canada) of the same antibiotics as above was applied onto the MH blood agar plates, incubated similarly as with the disk diffusion test, and readings were taken after three days, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The breakpoints used to classify strains as susceptible or resistant are as follows, according the latest EUCAST recommendations as of January 2014 (42): ≤0.12 μg/mL susceptible, >0.12 μg/mL resistant for AMX; ≤1 μg/mL susceptible, >1 μg/mL resistant for CIP, LVX and TET; ≤0.25 μg/mL susceptible, >0.5 μg/mL resistant for CLR; and ≤8 μg/mL susceptible, >8 μg/mL resistant for MTZ. The E-test evaluation was conducted in duplicate on two different occasions.
Genomic DNA extraction
H pylori was grown in Columbia broth (Quelab) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum with shaking at 100 rpm using a MaxQ 6000 incubated shaker (Thermo Scientific, USA) under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C for 48 h to 72 h. Subsequently, the broth culture was centrifuged at 1700 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline and then centrifuged again. Following removal of the supernatant, resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 [BioShop, Canada], 10 mM EDTA [BioShop], 100 mg/mL RNase A [Fermentas, Canada]) was added with an equal volume of a mixture of a 25:24:1 ratio of phenol (Fisher), chloroform (BioShop) and isoamyl alcohol (BioShop), respectively (PCI). The mixture was shaken for 2 min to 3 min and then centrifuged at 15000 × g in the Sorvall Legend Micro 17 centrifuge (Fisher) for 10 min. Twice, the supernatant was carefully retrieved and then another equal volume of PCI was added, mixed and centrifuged as previously described. RNase A/T1 (Fermentas) was then added to the supernatant and allowed to incubate in a 37°C water bath for 1 h. PCI was once more added to remove the RNase. Approximately 2.5 to 3 times the volume of an ethanol mix (0.16 M of sodium acetate in 500 mL absolute ethanol) was added to initiate DNA precipitation. After incubation at −20°C overnight, the solution was centrifuged again at 15000 × g to pellet the precipitated DNA. The pellet was then washed with 70% ethanol and dried using a Hetovac VR-1 vacuum centrifuge (Heto Lab Equipment, Denmark). DNase- and RNase-free water was used to solubilize the DNA. The purity and concentration of the DNA was verified using agarose gel electrophoresis and a Nanodrop 2000c Spectrophotometer (Fisher), respectively.
Sequencing of H pylori genome
All genome sequences generated at the Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada and HSN were produced using an Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies, Canada) sequencing technology.
The following gene sequences, obtained from GenBank, are involved with antimicrobial resistance and were used to query the entire genomes (43): 16S rRNA (TET) GI: 6626253, 23S rRNA (CLR) GI: 881379, gyrase A (gyrA, CIP/LVX) GI: 12057207, penicillin-binding protein 1A (pbp1A, AMX) GI: 6626253 and oxygen-insensitive NADPH nitroreductase (rdxA, MTZ) GI: 308035684. BLAST v2.2.29+ (44) searches were performed with each gene sequence against each H pylori genome. Genome contigs were manually inspected to check for artifacts in the extracted gene sequences using Gap5 v1.2.14-r (45). Extracted genes were saved in FASTA format and visualized in Seaview v4.5.0 (46). Gene alignments were performed using MUSCLE v3.8.31 (47). Each alignment was inspected for stop codons, insertions/deletions and frame shifts. The final alignments for the coding sequences were performed following their codon structure.
RESULTS
Patient recruitment, collection and identification of H pylori
Between October 2012 and November 2013, 301 patients volunteered to participate in the present study to provide gastric biopsy samples. Twenty of these participants (13 male, seven female) tested positive for H pylori. Biochemical testing on the isolated bacteria indicated positive reactions for urease, catalase and oxidase. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted on the bacterial isolates and 19 of 20 were found to have fragments of ureA, ureC and 16S rRNA. While the latter two amplicons were detected from the isolate from participant 60, ureA was only detected upon sequencing. Only seven of 20 indicated the presence of cagA according to PCR. According to the pathology reports, nearly all the patients had gastritis, while four of these patients also had metaplasia or hyperplasia (Table 2). One pathology report was not available. At the time of biopsy, 90% (18 of 20) of the positively identified patients were ≥50 years of age.
TABLE 2.
Resistance profile of 20 Helicobacter pylori isolates according to disk diffusion and E-test methods
| Isolate number | Pathology | AMX | TET | MTZ | CIP | LVX | CLR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| 10 μg* | MIC† | 30 μg* | MIC† | 5 μg* | MIC† | 5 μg* | MIC† | 5 μg* | MIC† | 15 μg* | MIC† | ||
| 45 | No pathology performed | S | <0.016 | S | <0.023 | S | <0.75 | R | >32 | R | <8 | R | >256 |
| 60 | Chronic gastritis, metaplasia | S | <0.023 | S | <0.094 | R | >256 | S | <0.064 | S | <0.094 | S | <0.19 |
| 63 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.032 | R | <0.75 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.064 |
| 66 | Chronic gastritis, hyperplasia | S | <0.016 | S | <0.25 | R | >256 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >256 |
| 103 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.023 | S | <0.019 | S | <0.75 | S | <0.38 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.047 |
| 104 | Gastritis | S | <0.032 | S | <0.032 | R | <64 | S | <0.19 | S | <0.19 | R | >256 |
| 163 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.023 | S | <0.125 | R | >256 | S | <0.75 | S | <0.5 | R | >256 |
| 170 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.047 | S | <0.5 | S | <0.019 | S | <0.019 | R | >256 |
| 173 | Acute and chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.047 | S | <0.38 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.064 |
| 181 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.5 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.047 |
| 195 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.032 | R | >256 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.094 | R | >256 |
| 207 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.032 | S | <0.023 | S | <0.094 | S | <0.064 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.094 |
| 209 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.032 | S | <0.125 | R | >32 | R | >32 | S | <0.047 |
| 227 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.094 | S | <0.047 | R | >32 | R | <6 | S | <0.023 |
| 236 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.023 | S | <0.38 | S | <0.19 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.032 |
| 239 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.064 | S | <0.125 | R | <48 | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | <96 |
| 243 | Chronic gastritis, metaplasia | S | <0.032 | S | <0.25 | R | >256 | S | <0.38 | S | <0.38 | S | <0.094 |
| 263 | Chronic gastritis, metaplasia | S | <0.064 | S | <0.047 | S | <0.75 | S | <0.25 | S | <0.19 | R | >256 |
| 283 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.032 | S | <0.25 | S | <1 | R | >32 | R | >32 | S | <0.023 |
| 288 | Chronic gastritis | S | <0.016 | S | <0.023 | S | <0.5 | S | <0.094 | S | <0.125 | S | <0.023 |
Per disk;
μg/mL. AMX Amoxicillin; CIP Ciprofloxacin; CLR Clarithromycin; LVX Levofloxacin; MIC Minimum inhibitory concentratio; MTZ Metronidazole; R Resistant; S Susceptible; TET Tetracycline
Disk diffusion assay
The antimicrobial resistance of the 20 H pylori isolates to AMX, TET, MTZ, CIP, LVX and CLR is listed in Table 3 as the average zone of inhibition, measured in millimetres. Results are also listed in Table 4 as being susceptible or resistant. Of 20 isolates, eight were resistant for MTZ (40%), six were resistant for CIP and LVX (30%), and eight were resistant for CLR (40%). None of the isolates were resistant to AMX or TET. Multiple resistances, outside of CIP and LVX (fluoroquinolones), were also observed. Two of 20 isolates (10%) were resistant to both MTZ and to the fluoroquinolones, three (15%) were resistant to CLR and the fluoroquinolones, five (25%) were resistant to MTZ and CLR, while two (10%) were resistant to MTZ, CLR and to the fluoroquinolones.
TABLE 3.
Average zone diameters (in mm) of inhibition according to disk diffusion
| Isolate number | AMX | TET | MTZ | CIP | LVX | CLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 58.0 | 54.0 | 20.7 | 6.0 | 14.7 | 6.0 |
| 60 | 53.3 | 55.7 | 9.3 | 46.0 | 44.7 | 54.3 |
| 63 | 62.0 | 60.3 | 14.0 | 47.7 | 46.7 | 50.7 |
| 66 | 59.3 | 50.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.7 |
| 103 | 54.7 | 52.0 | 19.0 | 39.7 | 38.7 | 52.7 |
| 104 | 53.7 | 56.7 | 7.0 | 43.0 | 39.7 | 7.3 |
| 163 | 44.3 | 58.0 | 6.0 | 36.3 | 34.7 | 6.0 |
| 170 | 56.7 | 57.7 | 16.5 | 39.3 | 38.0 | 6.0 |
| 173 | 56.0 | 51.7 | 30.0 | 39.3 | 37.7 | 46.3 |
| 181 | 52.0 | 40.0 | 26.3 | 40.3 | 44.0 | 55.0 |
| 195 | 54.7 | 61.3 | 6.0 | 47.3 | 46.0 | 6.0 |
| 207 | 60.3 | 66.7 | 47.7 | 49.3 | 49.0 | 60.7 |
| 209 | 59.7 | 57.0 | 26.7 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 48.3 |
| 227 | 56.7 | 50.3 | 16.7 | 6.0 | 18.0 | 48.3 |
| 236 | 56.7 | 61.7 | 35.7 | 44.7 | 41.0 | 52.7 |
| 239 | 49.7 | 52.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 15.0 | 6.0 |
| 243 | 65.0 | 53.7 | 6.0 | 39.0 | 40.7 | 54.0 |
| 263 | 51.3 | 64.0 | 32.3 | 44.7 | 44.0 | 6.0 |
| 283 | 54.7 | 52.7 | 22.3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 59.7 |
| 288 | 60.3 | 63.3 | 23.3 | 45.3 | 45.3 | 57.3 |
AMX Amoxicillin; CIP Ciprofloxacin; CLR Clarithromycin; LVX Levofloxacin; MTZ Metronidazole; TET Tetracycline
TABLE 4.
Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility according to disk diffusion and E-test
| Antimicrobial agent | Disk diffusion | Range, μg/mL | E-test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| Isolates, n (%) | Isolates, n (%) | ||||
|
|
|
||||
| Susceptible | Resistant | Susceptible | Resistant | ||
| Amoxicillin | 20 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.016–256 | 20 (100) | 0 (0) |
| Tetracycline | 20 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.016–256 | 20 (100) | 0 (0) |
| Metronidazole | 12 (60) | 8 (40) | 0.016–256 | 13 (65) | 7 (35) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 14 (70) | 6 (30) | 0.002–32 | 14 (70) | 6 (30) |
| Levofloxacin | 14 (70) | 6 (30) | 0.002–32 | 14 (70) | 6 (30) |
| Clarithromycin | 12 (60) | 8 (40) | 0.016–256 | 12 (60) | 8 (40) |
Minimum inhibitory concentration determination using E-test
The disk diffusion method alone is not sufficient to evaluate H pylori antimicrobial resistance because it is not yet standardized. As such, the E-test, following the manufacturer’s instructions, was performed in addition to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as recommended by EUCAST. Table 4 shows the resulting MIC determination using E-test strips. In evaluating AMX, the MIC was 0.064 μg/mL in two isolates, 0.032 μg/mL in four isolates, 0.023 μg/mL in three isolates and 0.016 μg/mL in 11 isolates. Because the breakpoint for AMX is 0.12 μg/mL, all of the isolates were deemed to be susceptible to AMX. All of the isolates were also susceptible to TET; the breakpoint is 1 μg/mL and the MIC values for all of the isolates were ≤0.25 μg/mL. Of the 20 isolates, seven were found to be resistant to MTZ (35%) because their MIC values were ≥48 μg/mL, which is higher than the breakpoint value of 8 μg/mL. Quinolone resistance was observed in six isolates (30%), which had MIC values much greater (>6 μg/mL) than the 1 μg/mL breakpoint. Finally, CLR testing showed that seven isolates had the maximum MIC values that were listed on the E-test strip (256 μg/mL), while one was 96 μg/mL, giving rise to a total of eight resistant isolates (40%) that were well above the 0.5 μg/mL breakpoint. There was excellent correspondence between disk diffusion and E-test; however, the isolate from participant 63 was not resistant to MTZ according to E-test, while disk diffusion results suggested resistance. Patterns of multiple resistances were nearly identical to those found by disk diffusion except for those related to isolate 63. There was at least one antibiotic resistance found in 13 of the isolates (65%).
Detection of mutations in H pylori genes associated with antimicrobial resistance
To corroborate these data on antimicrobial susceptibility, five H pylori genes, which have been documented to be associated with antimicrobial resistance when mutated, were examined. These genes (AMX – pbp1a; TET – 16S rRNA; MTZ – rdxA; CIP/LVX – gyrA; CLR – 23S rRNA) were compared with the sequences from the isolates in the present study (Table 5). The genomes collected were originally for another project at the authors’ laboratory; therefore, only the five genes were extracted for analysis.
TABLE 5.
Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori mutations that may be linked to antimicrobial resistance
| Isolate number | 23S rRNA | gyrA | rdxA | pbp1A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| CLR S/R | Mutation | CIP/LVX S/R | Mutation | MTZ S/R | Mutation | AMX S/R | Mutation | |
| 45 | R | A2143G (26) | R | G271A (57) | S | S | V45I (64), V16I (64), S543R (66) | |
| 60 | S | S | R | nd | S | V16I, S543R | ||
| 63 | S | S | R | nd | S | |||
| 66 | R | A2143G | R | G271A | R | nd | S | |
| 103 | S | S | S | S | S543T (present study) | |||
| 104 | R | A2143G | S | R | nd | S | V16I, S543R | |
| 163 | R | A2143G | S | R | nd | S | S543N (present study) | |
| 170 | R | A2143G | S | S | S | S543R | ||
| 173 | S | S | S | S | ||||
| 181 | S | S | S | S | S543R | |||
| 195 | R | A2143G | S | R | C16T (stop) (present study) | S | V16I, S543R | |
| 207 | S | S | S | S | S543N | |||
| 209 | S | R | G271A | S | S | S543R | ||
| 227 | S | R | A272G (57) | S | S | V16I, S543R | ||
| 236 | S | S | S | S | ||||
| 239 | R | A2143G | R | G271A | R | nd | S | S543R |
| 243 | S | S | R | ins121GAAATC-GCC (present study) | S | V16I, S543R | ||
| 263 | R | A2142G (26) | S | S | S | T556S (65), S543R | ||
| 283 | S | R | G271A | S | S | S543R | ||
| 288 | S | S | S | S | ||||
AMX Amoxicillin; CIP Ciprofloxacin; CLR Clarithromycin; LVX Levofloxacin; MTZ Metronidazole; nd Did not detect any mutations that have been previously linked to antimicrobial resistance; R Resistant; rRNA Ribosomal RNA; S Susceptible; TET Tetracycline
Seven of the eight strains that were found to be resistant to CLR showed a point mutation, A2143G, in the 23S rRNA sequence, while the other strain from participant 263 revealed an A2142G mutation (Table 5). These mutations were not detected among the strains susceptible to CLR. Six strains that were resistant to CIP and LVX were also found to have mutations. Five had the G271A point mutation in the gyrA gene, while one isolate had an A272G mutation. The susceptible strains did not possess these mutations. Interestingly, while many strains were found to be resistant to MTZ, only two showed unique mutations to the rdxA gene, which has not been previously documented. One showed a C16T point mutation that led to a stop codon, and an insert at nucleotide 121 with the sequence GAAATCGCC, which kept the remainder of the sequence in frame. No other mutations that have been documented to be involved with resistance were detected in the other resistant strains. There were amino acid mutations detected in the pbp1a gene that have been associated with AMX resistance; however, all of the isolates were susceptible to the antibiotic and, thus, the mutations may not be involved in resistance. They include individual and combinations of V16I, V45I, T556S, A599T, S543R and G595S mutations. Interestingly, some of the isolates have newly found mutations for S543 to asparagine or threonine, or insertions at G595, but whether they appear as single or multiple mutations, they do not appear to be sufficient to confer resistance. No known mutations of 16S rRNA that are responsible for TET resistance were found, which was consistent with the present findings that all of the isolates were susceptible to TET.
DISCUSSION
Monitoring emerging antimicrobial-resistant strains of H pylori is paramount for therapeutic treatment to be successful. While Canada has a lower prevalence rate than the global average, increased international travel and immigration from countries that have high endemic rates of H pylori should be a signal that surveillance should not only continue in Canada and the world, but also perhaps increase.
The present study was the first to examine antimicrobial susceptibility in Northern Ontario. It is surprising that a relatively high percentage of resistance to certain antibiotics was found by E-test, namely MTZ (35%), CLR (40%) and CIP/LVX (30%), despite the small number of H pylori isolates in the study. To compare, in 2000, Fallone (29) determined that MTZ resistance in Canada was between 11% and 48%, while resistance to CLR was 0% to 12%. The variation in data evaluated by Fallone reflected the difficulty in discerning primary and secondary resistance when results were reported. For CIP/LVX, it was estimated that resistance in Canada was <10% in 2004 (30). It is possible that the data we obtained could be attributed to region-specific demographics, and that a broader and larger sample size would be a better reflection of antimicrobial resistance in Ontario. However, the fact remains that a large percentage of antibiotic resistance was found. The data suggest that not only will physicians need to identify H pylori quickly, but also that susceptibility testing should be part of the clinical evaluation so that treatment can be tailored to combat the infection more effectively, rather than relying on consensus guidelines, and to prevent or slow the development of antimicrobial resistance.
In Canada, the incidence of AMX resistance was <2% as of 1997 (48), while there has yet to be any public information on resistance rates, if any, of TET since 2000 (29). Our work is consistent with previous data in that AMX and TET resistance have yet to become more prevalent in Canada and that, for the time being, they remain effective in H pylori eradication.
There was 100% agreement in results determining susceptibility or resistance of H pylori between the use of antimicrobial disks and the E-test for five of the six antibiotics tested. For MTZ, 19 of 20 isolates were consistent with one another. This is in relative agreement with previous studies that used conditions closely resembling our methodology, in which there was a 7% discrepancy when evaluating MTZ resistance (49).
While 100% agreement between the E-test and disk diffusion assay was not observed with MTZ, the small percentage of discrepancy should be an indication that outside of MTZ, disk diffusion may be able to provide rapid and cost-effective insight into antimicrobial resistance. The greatest challenge in using it to evaluate MTZ resistance is that a standard zone diameter does not exist and that several other factors complicate a proper evaluation (50). The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, EUCAST and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy do not recommend the use of antibiotic disks for clinical studies because the stability of the antibiotics on the disk may be compromised after 48 h to 72 h of growth, which is normally required for testing H pylori. Regardless, many laboratories still use this approach as a cost-effective measure to monitor emerging resistant H pylori strains. The agar dilution method is considered to be the gold standard and is effective in large batch studies to provide accurate MICs, but is technically too demanding to be a viable test for everyday practice (51,52). The E-test method generally has a more consistent antibiotic release, is able to tolerate prolonged incubation and can provide MICs (53). However, an E-test strip costs approximately 100 times more than an antimicrobial disk, which can be prohibitive in terms of cost and access in developing countries where they try to establish surveillance programs, especially because incidence rates of H pylori are often higher in some developing nations (7). As such, laboratories in countries such as India, Iran and Turkey continue to use disk diffusion to determine susceptible and resistant H pylori strains, while efficiently selecting for more effective therapies (39,54–56). If the cost and the ease of evaluation are prohibitive factors in screening for H pylori antimicrobial resistance, disk diffusion, with the possible exception of MTZ, should be an acceptable approach through the development of standardized zones of inhibition.
The mutations detected in the 23S rRNA gene that led to CLR resistance in the present study were consistent with the same mutations that have been described previously (26). The A2142 and A2143 nucleotides are located in the peptidyl transferase loop of the secondary structure of the gene and, as such, the mutations to guanine cause a conformational change in the loop, leading to decreased binding of CLR (26). Similarly, mutations in the gyrA gene (G271A, A272G, which correspond to amino acid changes D91N and D91G) that led to resistance to CIP and LVX are also well known in a previous study (57). These mutations have been very consistent in literature as mutations that confer resistance, and served as a validation for our antimicrobial susceptibility results. Recently, it has been suggested that an efflux pathway may also be involved in CLR resistance (13).
In contrast to CLR and the quinolones tested, the mechanism behind MTZ resistance is significantly more complicated. All seven isolates resistant to MTZ, as determined by E-test, did not possess any mutations that are known to cause H pylori to be resistant to the drug (37,58). In fact, it has not been possible to clearly identify a set of rdxA mutations that consistently accounted for resistance (59,60). However, two of the strains, those from patient 195 (C16T mutation leading to a stop codon) and patient 243 (an insert of nine nucleotides), did show new mutations that may lead to resistance. These mutations would need to be investigated individually using a control strain to determine whether they are involved with MTZ susceptibility. Studies have shown that other genes, such as frxA, may also be involved with MTZ resistance when mutated (61). It has also been shown that MTZ resistance can occur without any mutations to the rdxA or frxA genes, suggesting that another mechanism may be involved (62), such as the Fur protein that, when mutated, may be able to eliminate the drug (63). Clearly, the complex mechanism behind MTZ resistance will need to be evaluated in future studies.
In our study, every isolate was susceptible to AMX; however, several mutations that were previously described as being linked to resistance were discovered to be present in our isolates. Amino acid mutations such as V45I and V16I, found in six of our isolates, confirmed previous studies in which they were determined to have no effect on antimicrobial susceptibility (64). The mutations G595S and A599T have also been described previously, although it is unknown what their contribution is to resistance because they were part of a series of mutations that led to drug resistance (64). In the present study, we found amino acid insertions at position 595, yet no resistance was found. Another mutation (T556S) was found to be singly capable of conferring resistance in one study (65); however, this was not the case in the present study. Mutations at serine 543 have also been linked to resistance, although not necessarily as a single mutation (66). Fifteen of the 20 isolates had mutations at this amino acid, but no resistance was conferred. H pylori from participant 263 had both T556S and S543R mutations, yet this strain was still susceptible to AMX. This suggests that multiple mutations to pbp1A may be required to confer resistance. High-level resistance to AMX may also involve mutations to porin proteins, notably HopB (AlpB), HopC (AlpA) and HopD (65,67).
While we report relatively high resistance rates against CLR, MTZ and CIP/LVX, it should be noted that we were unable to determine whether these were primary or secondary resistances. When treatment with an antibiotic fails, it would normally result in a higher probability of a selection of an isolate that is resistant, particularly with MTZ and CIP and, thus, we cannot preclude the possibility that patients may have been previously treated with antibiotics (68,69). It is then possible that there is horizontal transfer of resistance to susceptible strains in individuals who are infected with more than one strain (70).
H pylori is pathogenic and potentially carcinogenic. The present pilot study provides a small, yet important, glimpse into the prevalence of H pylori in Northeastern Ontario, in addition to the frequency and molecular mechanisms of antimicrobial-resistant strains. While the present study examined cases of H pylori from one institution within a relatively small geographical area, the high proportion of antimicrobial resistance relative to previous reports is alarming. With the presence of strains in the present study that are resistant to multiple antibiotics, particularly MTZ and CLR, which are most frequently used under current treatment guidelines, carefully devised regimens examining antimicrobial susceptibility of H pylori strains and consideration of past use of antibiotics, rather than adherence to consensus guidelines, may be preferable. The Maastricht IV guidelines do allow for appropriate changes in treatment if it is not effective due to high prevalence of antibiotic resistance. However, this information needs to be available before changes can be initiated. Routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing would be a good place to start. Future studies to determine whether our results are found in other jurisdictions will need to be conducted to determine whether increased antimicrobial resistance of H pylori is widespread.
Despite emerging studies of other mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, chromosomal mutations in H pylori remain the primary source. If other mechanisms are involved, whole genome sequencing provides an opportunity to examine mutations during disease progression or selection, which may lead to a tailored treatment that would facilitate H pylori eradication instead of resistance selection.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association awarded to FDM. The authors thank Drs Kim Stephen Tilbe, Heather Boudreau, Jagan Reddy and Robert Smith for volunteering their services in the endoscopy unit at HSN and extracting gastric biopsies.
Footnotes
DISCLOSURES: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cheung J, Goodman K, Munday R, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in Canada’s arctic: Searching for the solutions. CanJGastroenterol. 2008;22:912–6. doi: 10.1155/2008/614538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Survival rates for stomach cancer by stage. Am Cancer Soc. 2013. < www.cancer.org/cancer/stomachcancer/detailedguide/stomach-cancer-survival-rates> (Accessed July 15, 2014).
- 3.McColl KE. Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1597–604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;61:1–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Naja F, Kreiger N, Sullivan T. Helicobacter pylori infection in Ontario: Prevalence and risk factors. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:501–6. doi: 10.1155/2007/462804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thomson AB, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, et al. The prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia: The Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empiric Treatment – Prompt Endoscopy (CADET-PE) study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:1481–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Graham DY, Adam E, Reddy GT, et al. Seroepidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in India. Comparison of developing and developed countries. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36:1084–8. doi: 10.1007/BF01297451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Graham DY, Malaty HM, Evans DG, Evans DJ, Jr, Klein PD, Adam E. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in an asymptomatic population in the United States. Effect of age, race, and socioeconomic status. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:1495–501. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90644-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moayyedi P, Axon AT, Feltbower R, et al. Relation of adult lifestyle and socioeconomic factors to the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:624–31. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.3.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Woodward M, Morrison C, McColl K. An investigation into factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:175–81. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olafsson S, Berstad A. Changes in food tolerance and lifestyle after eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:268–76. doi: 10.1080/00365520310000717a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bernstein CN, McKeown I, Embil JM, et al. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori, incidence of gastric cancer, and peptic ulcer-associated hospitalizations in a Canadian Indian population. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:668–74. doi: 10.1023/a:1026689103952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vakil N, Vaira D. Treatment for H. pylori infection: New challenges with antimicrobial resistance. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:383–8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318277577b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Delaney BC, Qume M, Moayyedi P, et al. Helicobacter pylori test and treat versus proton pump inhibitor in initial management of dyspepsia in primary care: Multicentre randomised controlled trial (MRC-CUBE trial) BMJ. 2008;336:651–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39479.640486.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sharma VK, Howden CW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ perceptions and practices related to Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:326–31. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200404000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Megraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:280–322. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bourke B, Ceponis P, Chiba N, et al. Canadian Helicobacter Study Group Consensus Conference: Update on the approach to Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents – an evidence-based evaluation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005;19:399–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hunt R, Fallone C, Veldhuyzan van Zanten S, et al. Canadian Helicobacter Study Group Consensus Conference: Update on the management of Helicobacter pylori--an evidence-based evaluation of six topics relevant to clinical outcomes in patients evaluated for H pylori infection. Can J Gastroenterol. 2004;18:547–54. doi: 10.1155/2004/326767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cuadrado-Lavin A, Salcines-Caviedes JR, Carrascosa MF, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to six antibiotics currently used in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:170–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Graham DY, Fischbach L. Helicobacter pylori treatment in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Gut. 2010;59:1143–53. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.192757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection – the Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2012;61:646–64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heep M, Kist M, Strobel S, Beck D, Lehn N. Secondary resistance among 554 isolates of Helicobacter pylori after failure of therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:538–41. doi: 10.1007/s100960000288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sycuro LK, Pincus Z, Gutierrez KD, et al. Peptidoglycan crosslinking relaxation promotes Helicobacter pylori’s helical shape and stomach colonization. Cell. 2010;141:822–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Attumi TA, Graham DY. High-dose extended-release lansoprazole (dexlansoprazole) and amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections. Helicobacter. 2014;19:319–22. doi: 10.1111/hel.12126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Occhialini A, Urdaci M, Doucet-Populaire F, Bébéar CM, Lamouliatte H, Mégraud F. Macrolide resistance in Helicobacter pylori: Rapid detection of point mutations and assays of macrolide binding to ribosomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2724–8. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.12.2724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Versalovic J, Shortridge D, Kibler K, et al. Mutations in 23S rRNA are associated with clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:477–80. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gerrits MM, de Zoete MR, Arents NLA, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG. 16S rRNA mutation-mediated tetracycline resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2996–3000. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2996-3000.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Trieber CA, Taylor DE. Mutations in the 16S rRNA genes of Helicobacter pylori mediate resistance to tetracycline. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2131–40. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2131-2140.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fallone CA. Epidemiology of the antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000;14:879–82. doi: 10.1155/2000/562159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Best L, Haldane DJ, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S. Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance in Canadian populations. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:S1293. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheung J, Morse AL, Goodman KJ, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and antibiotic resistance in an Aboriginal population in Canada’s Arctic: Preliminary results from the Aklavik H. pylori Project. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:A341. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sethi A, Chaudhuri M, Kelly L, Hopman W. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in a First Nations population in northwestern Ontario. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59:e182–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Taylor DE, Jiang Q, Fedorak RN. Antibiotic susceptibilities of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in the Province of Alberta. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998;12:295–8. doi: 10.1155/1998/672746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hiratsuka K, Logan SM, Conlan JW, et al. Identification of a D-glycero-D-manno-heptosyltransferase gene from Helicobacter pylori. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:5156–65. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.15.5156-5165.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halebian S, Harris B, Finegold SM, Rolfe RD. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:444–8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.444-448.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Garcia LS, editor. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 3rd edn. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang G, Wilson TJ, Jiang Q, Taylor DE. Spontaneous mutations that confer antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:727–33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.727-733.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Toledo H, López-Solís R. Tetracycline resistance in Chilean clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:470–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.EUCAST. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. EUCAST disk diffusion method. < www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Disk_test_documents/Manual_v_3.0_EUCAST_Disk_Test.pdf> (Accessed April 2013).
- 40.Boyanova L, Stancheva I, Spassova Z, Katzarov N, Mitov I, Koumanova R. Primary and combined resistance to four antimicrobial agents in Helicobacter pylori in Sofia, Bulgaria. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:415–8. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-5-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee CC, Lee VWY, Chan FKL, Ling TKW. Levofloxacin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in Hong Kong. Chemotherapy. 2008;54:50–3. doi: 10.1159/000112416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 4.0, 2014.
- 43.Mégraud F. H pylori antibiotic resistance: Prevalence, importance, and advances in testing. Gut. 2004;53:1374–84. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.022111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bonfield JK, Whitwham A. Gap5 – editing the billion fragment sequence assembly. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1699–703. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:221–4. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fedorak R, Archambault A, Flamm R, Osato M, Stamler D. Antimicrobial susceptibility of H. pylori in Canada to three key antibiotics: Metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:A115. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith C, Perkins J, Tompkins DS. Comparison of Etest and disc diffusion for detection of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. PHLS Microbiol Dig. 1997;14:21–3. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Weiss K, Laverdière M, Restieri C. Comparison of activity of 10 antibiotics against clinical strains of Helicobacter pylori by three different techniques. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998;12:181–5. doi: 10.1155/1998/765795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Osato MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori: Sensitivity test results and their clinical relevance. Curr Pharm Des. 2000;6:1545–55. doi: 10.2174/1381612003399059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.DeCross AJ, Marshall BJ, McCallum RW, Hoffman SR, Barrett LJ, Guerrant RL. Metronidazole susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori: Comparison of disk, broth, and agar dilution methods and their clinical relevance. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:1971–4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.1971-1974.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cederbrant G, Kahlmeter G, Ljungh A. The E test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:65–71. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mishra KK, Srivastava S, Garg A, Ayyagari A. Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates: Comparative evaluation of disk-diffusion and E-test methods. Curr Microbiol. 2006;53:329–34. doi: 10.1007/s00284-006-0143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Falsafi T, Mobasheri F, Nariman F, Najafi M. Susceptibilities to different antibiotics of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients at the pediatric medical center of Tehran, Iran. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:387–9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.387-389.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ozbey G, Bahcecioglu IH, Acik MN. Resistance rates to various antimicrobial agents of Helicobacter pylori isolates in Eastern Turkey. Int J Mol Clin Microbiol. 2012;2:148–52. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moore RA, Beckthold B, Wong S, Kureishi A, Bryan LE. Nucleotide sequence of the gyrA gene and characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:107–11. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Paul R, Postius S, Melchers K, Schäfer KP. Mutations of the Helicobacter pylori genes rdxA and pbp1 cause resistance against metronidazole and amoxicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:962–5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.962-965.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mendz GL, Mégraud F. Is the molecular basis of metronidazole resistance in microaerophilic organisms understood? Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:370–5. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(02)02405-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chisholm SA, Owen RJ. Mutations in Helicobacter pylori rdxA gene sequences may not contribute to metronidazole resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:995–9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marais A, Bilardi C, Cantet F, Mendz GL, Mégraud F. Characterization of the genes rdxA and frxA involved in metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Res Microbiol. 2003;154:137–44. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bereswill S, Krainick C, Stähler F, Herrmann L, Kist M. Analysis of the rdxA gene in high-level metronidazole-resistant clinical isolates confirms a limited use of rdxA mutations as a marker for prediction of metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;36:193–8. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Choi SS, Chivers PT, Berg DE. Point mutations in Helicobacter pylori’s fur regulatory gene that alter resistance to metronidazole, a prodrug activated by chemical reduction. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kim BJ, Kim JG. Substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 1 in amoxicillin-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from Korean patients. Gut Liver. 2013;7:655–60. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.6.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Matteo MJ, Granados G, Olmos M, Wonaga A, Catalano M. Helicobacter pylori amoxicillin heteroresistance due to point mutations in PBP-1A in isogenic isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:474–7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kwon DH, Dore MP, Kim JJ, et al. High-level β-lactam resistance associated with acquired multidrug resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2169–78. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2169-2178.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Co E-MA, Schiller NL. Resistance mechanisms in an in vitro-selected amoxicillin-resistant strain of Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:4174–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00759-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Goodwin CS, Marshall BJ, Blincow ED, Wilson DH, Blackbourn S, Phillips M. Prevention of nitroimidazole resistance in Campylobacter pylori by coadministration of colloidal bismuth subcitrate: Clinical and in vitro studies. J Clin Pathol. 1988;41:207–10. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tompkins DS, Perkin J, Smith C. Failed treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection associated with resistance to clarithromycin. Helicobacter. 1997;2:185–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.1997.tb00085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fantry GT, Zheng QX, Darwin PE, Rosenstein AH, James SP. Mixed infection with cagA-positive and cagA-negative strains of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 1996;1:98–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.1996.tb00018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Engstrand L, Nguyen AM, Graham DY, el-Zaatari FA. Reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction amplification of rRNA for detection of Helicobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2295–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.9.2295-2301.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tummuru MK, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Cloning and expression of a high-molecular-mass major antigen of Helicobacter pylori: Evidence of linkage to cytotoxin production. Infect Immun. 1993;61:1799–809. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.5.1799-1809.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Labigne A, Cussac V, Courcoux P. Shuttle cloning and nucleotide sequences of Helicobacter pylori genes responsible for urease activity. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:1920–31. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.6.1920-1931.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Clayton C, Kleanthous K, Tabaqchali S. Detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44:515–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.6.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
