Skip to main content
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2015 Jul 21;9:415. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00415

Corrigendum: A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

Péter P Ujma 1, Ferenc Gombos 2, Lisa Genzel 3, Boris N Konrad 4, Péter Simor 5,6, Axel Steiger 4, Martin Dresler 4,7,*, Róbert Bódizs 1,2
PMCID: PMC4508513  PMID: 26257631

The description of the Individual Adjustment Method (IAM) algorithm for sleep spindle analyses (Ujma et al., 2015) contained an error, which we hereby rectify. On page 5, line 7–8, instead of f(x) = e(−(x−xm)/(w/2)), the equation should read as follows:

f(x) = e−(((x−xm)/(w/2))2)

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ujma P. P., Gombos F., Genzel L., Konrad B. N., Simor P., Steiger A., et al. (2015). A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:52 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES