Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Jul 21;5:12268. doi: 10.1038/srep12268

Unveiling hidden ferrimagnetism and giant magnetoelectricity in polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8

Yazhong Wang 1, Gheorghe L Pascut 1, Bin Gao 1, Trevor A Tyson 1,2, Kristjan Haule 1, Valery Kiryukhin 1, Sang-Wook Cheong 1,a
PMCID: PMC4508583  PMID: 26194108

Abstract

Magnetoelectric (ME) effect is recognized for its utility for low-power electronic devices. Largest ME coefficients are often associated with phase transitions in which ferroelectricity is induced by magnetic order. Unfortunately, in these systems, large ME response is revealed only upon elaborate poling procedures. These procedures may become unnecessary in single-polar-domain crystals of polar magnets. Here we report giant ME effects in a polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8 at temperatures as high as 60 K. Polarization jumps of 0.3 μC/cm2, and repeated mutual control of ferroelectric and magnetic moments with differential ME coefficients on the order of 104 ps/m are achieved. Importantly, no electric or magnetic poling is needed, as necessary for applications. The sign of the ME coefficients can be switched by changing the applied “bias” magnetic field. The observed effects are associated with a hidden ferrimagnetic order unveiled by application of a magnetic field.

A significant effort has been invested into finding new materials in which macroscopic properties, such as the magnetization and the electric polarization, are coupled and controlled by external parameters like temperature and electric or magnetic fields1,2,3,4,5. Materials where these quantities are interconnected are highly desired due to their importance in developing devices with new functionalities6,7,8. Examples of materials falling into this category are the pyroelectric and multiferroic materials9,10,11,12. The practical aspect of pyroelectric materials is the capacity to generate a current when they are subjected to a temporal temperature gradient through heating or cooling. Due to the efficient conversion of thermal energy into electrical energy, pyroelectric materials have offered numerous device applications, for example for temperature-sensing13,14 and for thermoelectric applications15. The practical aspect of multiferroic materials is the ability to mutual control the magnetization (polarization) by the use of external electric (magnetic) fields, the effect known as magnetoelectric (ME) effect16,17,18. The ME effect can be linear or/and non-linear with respect to the external fields and it is characterized by the appropriate ME coefficients19,20. At the present time, materials with large ME coefficients are exploited for developing low-power magnetoelectronic-based devices and new multiple state memory elements21,22. Recently, materials with significant ME response associated with ferroelectricity induced by magnetic order have been identified23,24,25. Unfortunately, elaborate poling procedures, such as cooling in applied electric and magnetic fields, are needed to reveal the largest ME coefficients in these systems. Finding new materials with colossal ME coefficients lacking this drawback is of primary importance for prospective applications.

Materials belonging to the polar crystallographic symmetry groups lack the inversion symmetry at all temperatures. Many of these materials contain magnetic ions, and they often exhibit long-range magnetic order. We call these materials “polar magnets”. The prerequisite for non-trivial magnetoelectricity is simultaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry and space inversion symmetry. Thus, all polar magnets should exhibit non-trivial ME effects below magnetic ordering temperatures. Importantly, monodomain polar single crystals can often be grown, potentially eliminating the need for any poling procedures to reveal the largest possible ME response. While the polar magnets are numerous, the investigation of their magnetoelectricity has been extremely limited. The few examples of polar magnets whose magnetoelectricity has been studied include GaFeO3 (ref. 26) and Ni3TeO6 (ref. 24). Clearly, a targeted search for enhanced ME effects among polar magnets holds significant promise.

For the ME device applications, ferro- or ferrimagnetic polar magnets are some of the best candidates, as macroscopic magnetic moment is needed for their functionality. Such compounds are rare. However, in some cases macroscopic magnetic moment is “hidden” within a nominally antiferromagnetic state, and can be easily revealed in a modest applied magnetic field, thereby leading to a potentially large ME response. A well-known example of such a hidden moment is realized in La2CuO4, the parent compound of high-TC cuprate superconductors27. Each Cu-O plane exhibits a weak ferromagnetic moment due to canting of the spins of the otherwise regular Neel order. The canting results from Dzyaloshinsky-Moria interaction. Weak ferromagnetism is masked in zero magnetic field because of the antiferromagnetic interplane coupling. However, spin canting is responsible for the many distinct magnetic properties of this compound, including the unusual shape of the magnetic susceptibility in the vicinity of TN and in an applied field, and the atomic-scale giant magnetoresistence in the field-induced weakly ferromagnetic phase. Another layered magnet in which a small ferrimagnetic moment of each layer is hidden at zero field is multiferroic (but nonpolar at high T) LuFe2O4 (ref. 28). The giant magnetic coercivity and the unusual ME relaxation properties of LuFe2O4 are related to the ferrimagnetism in its Fe-O layers. Similar to these compounds, a hidden magnetic moment in a polar magnet could result in a strongly enhanced magnetic response, which should lead to large ME effects when the magnetic moment and crystal structure are coupled.

Herein, we report giant ME effects in a monodomain polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8, that possesses both multiferroic and pyroelectric characteristics. Below TN ≈ 60 K, it exhibits a layered collinear magnetic structure with a small ferrimagnetic moment in each layer29. As in La2CuO4, this moment is “hidden”, but can be revealed in a modest applied magnetic field28. As a result of field- and temperature-induced magnetic transitions in Fe2Mo3O8, the electric polarization exhibits changes as large as 0.3 μC/cm2. As the hidden ferrimagnetism is converted to a bulk moment by an applied magnetic field, giant differential ME coefficients approaching 104 ps/m are achieved. The observed effects are significantly larger than those previously reported in polar magnets, such as Ni3TeO6 (ref. 24). The ME control is mutual, as both the magnetization and electric polarization can be tuned by the electric and magnetic field, respectively. Importantly, no electric or magnetic poling is needed, and the sign of the differential ME coefficients can be switched by simply changing the applied “bias” magnetic field. Using first principles calculations, we show that exchange striction is the leading mechanism responsible for the observed ME effects. Our results demonstrate the promise of polar magnets as ME systems, and indicate that their functional properties could be further enhanced by presence of a local (“hidden”) magnetic moment that can be easily converted to macroscopic magnetization by an applied field.

Results

Fe2Mo3O8, known as the mineral kamiokite30,31, consists of honeycomb-like Fe-O layers separated by sheets of Mo4+ ions, See Fig. 1(a). The layers are stacked along the c axis. The Fe-O layer is formed in the ab plane by corner-sharing FeO4 tetrahedra and FeO6 octahedra, as shown in Fig. 1(b). In this layer, the tetrahedral (Fet) and octahedral (FeO) triangular sublattices are shifted along the c axis by 0.614 Å with respect to each other31, leading to short and long interlayer Fe-Fe distances, see Fig. 1(a). The vertices of the FeO4 tetrahedra point along the positive c axis, reflecting the polar structure of Fe2Mo3O8 (ref. 31). The Mo kagome-like layer is trimerized. The Mo trimers are in the singlet state, and do not contribute to magnetism32. Below TN ≈ 60 K, the Fe2+ moments exhibit the antiferromagnetic (AFM) order in the honeycomb layers, see Fig. 1(c). As discussed below, FeO has larger spin than Fet, and therefore each of the Fe-O layers is ferrimagnetic33. Along the c axis, the nearest Fe spins are aligned in the same direction, implying ferromagnetic interlayer coupling. The resulting stacking of the ferrimagnetic Fe-O layers along the c axis leads to vanishing macroscopic magnetic moment, and we call this state AFM.

Figure 1. Magnetic transition in Fe2Mo3O8.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Crystal structure of Fe2Mo3O8. Vertical lines connect the nearest Fe ions along the c axis (blue lines are longer than the red ones). (b) The Fe-O layer in the ab crystallographic plane. Thick line depicts the largest Fe-Fe magnetic coupling J. (c) Schematic view of the AFM and FRM orders. Pink arrows represent the ferrimagnetic moments of the individual Fe-O layers. (d) The AFM order, together with the calculated largest ionic shifts associated with the paramagnetic to AFM transition. The direction of the magnetically-induced ΔP is shown with a thick arrow. (e) Temperature dependence of DC magnetic susceptibility χDC in zero field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) processes along two crystallographic directions, parallel and perpendicular to the c axis, in μ0H = 0.2 T. (f) Specific heat anomaly at the Neel temperature. Red line represents the double Debye model fit discussed in the text. Insert: the image of as-grown Fe2Mo3O8 single crystal.

The temperature variation of DC magnetic susceptibility χ in zero field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) processes is shown in Fig. 1(e) for the magnetic field both parallel and normal to the c axis. The shapes of the curves are consistent with the transition to the AFM order shown in Fig. 1(c) at TN = 61 K, with Fe2+ spins pointing along the c axis. The large difference between the c-axis and in-pane susceptibilities in the paramagnetic state demonstrates appreciable anisotropy of the Fe2+ spins. No thermal hysteresis is observed, see Supplementary Fig. 1. A large specific heat (CP) anomaly is present at the magnetic transition, see Fig. 1(f). To account for the phonon part, the specific heat was fit to a double Debye model for T > TN (90 to 200 K). The best fit, shown in Fig. 1(f), was obtained for the Debye temperatures θD1 = 174 K and θD2 = 834 K. It fails for T < TN as it implies a negative magnetic contribution for T < 50 K. This indicates an additional lattice contribution for these temperatures, suggesting a structural transition associated with the magnetic order. This suggestion is corroborated by the temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε(T) and the variation of the electric polarization ΔP(T) ∫ P(T)-P(T = 120 K), both along the c axis, shown in Fig. 2(a,b). In particular, the jump of ΔP at TN clearly indicates simultaneous magnetic and structural transitions. The magnitude of this jump, ~0.3 μC/cm2, is larger than the values typically observed in multiferroics, and is the largest measured value in polar magnets, to our knowledge. Importantly, no poling is needed in an already polar material to observe the changes shown in Fig. 2(a,b). In particular, ΔP was measured by integrating the pyroelectric current on warming after cooling down to T = 5 K in zero electric field (see Supplementary Fig. 2 for details). In our measurements, the direction of the ΔP vector (along or opposite to the positive direction of the c axis defined above) is undetermined. First principles calculations described below indicate that ΔP points in the positive c direction, hence we adopt this convention here.

Figure 2. Magnetically-induced electric polarization, and the metemagnetic transition.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Temperature dependence of the c-axis dielectric constant ϵ(T), f = 44 kHZ. (b) Variation of the c-axis electric polarization ΔP with temperature. (c,d) Magnetic field dependence of magnetization M(H) and polarization ΔP(H) at various temperatures. In (d), solid (open) circles depict the data obtained upon sweeping the magnetic field up (down).

Magnetic field (H) induces a metamagnetic transition signaled by sharp magnetization (M) jumps, see Fig. 2(c). It is accompanied by a structural transition indicated by the corresponding jumps in the electric polarization, as shown in Fig. 2(d). A small hysteresis is observed in the latter transition. The ΔP ∫ P(H)-P(H = 0 T) vector is in the negative c axis direction, and its value at T = 50 K is roughly twice as small as the ΔP induced at TN for H = 0 T. No poling of any kind is needed. Replacement of Fe with Mn, as well as Zn doping on the Fe site are known to convert the AFM state observed in Fe2Mo3O8 into a ferrimagnetic (FRM) state32,33, in which the AFM order in the Fe-O layers is preserved, but the spins in every second layer are flipped, see Fig. 1(c). In the FRM state, the ferrimagnetic moments of the Fe-O layers are co-aligned, giving rise to a macroscopic magnetization. The extrapolation of the high-field M(H) data of Fig. 2(c) to zero field gives a positive intercept of ~0.5 μB/f.u. at T = 50 K, indicating the ferrimagnetic character of the high-field state, which we assume to have the same FRM structure as shown in Fig. 1(c). This assumption is corroborated by the Fe-O net ferrimagnetic moment of 0.6 μB/f.u. for a single layer, expected from the Moessbauer measurements of the FeO and Fet moments33 (4.83 μB and 4.21 μB, respectively), as well as by the results of the first principles calculations described below.

Discussion

To understand the microscopic origin of the observed ME effects, we have carried out ab-initio calculations in the framework of density functional theory adding an on-site Coulomb self-interacting potential U (DFT + U). For the DFT part, the generalized gradient approximation Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (GGA-PBE) functional was used. For U = 0, the ground state is metallic with the FRM structure, but moderate correlation strength (U = 4 eV) leads to an AFM insulating ground state. While U of the order of 4 eV is required to obtain the correct ground state, its exact value was found to be unimportant for the magnetic exchange energies relevant to this work. The details of the DFT calculations can be found in the Methods section. The ionic positions were optimized for two imposed magnetic structures, the AFM and FRM. The FRM structure was found marginally higher in total energy (less than 10 meV/f.u.), indicating that this phase is expected to be induced in modest magnetic fields, consistent with our experimental data.

The calculated ionic shifts for the transitions from the paramagnetic (PARA) to the AFM state, and from AFM to FRM, are shown in Figs 1(c) and 3(c,d). The ionic shifts for every ion in the unit cell are given in Supplementary Table I. The experimental paramagnetic structure, and the calculated AFM and FRM structures were used. The ionic shifts can be utilized for an estimate of the magnetically-induced electric polarization change ΔP. While the total polarization is a multivalued quantity, the difference ΔP between two structures is a well-defined quantity34. For a qualitative comparison with experiment, it is sufficient to use the ionic-like formula for ΔP given by Inline graphic, where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the c-axis ionic coordinates for the initial and the final structures, respectively, Inline graphic are the formal ionic charges, V is the unit cell volume, and the sum is taken over the unit cell. For the PARA to AFM, and AFM to FRM transitions, we obtain ΔP values of 0.60(11) μC/cm2 and −0.55(11) μC/cm2, respectively. The calculated magnitudes and the relative signs of ΔP are in good qualitative agreement with our experiments. The positive sign of ΔP for the PARA to AFM transition indicates that the ΔP vector points along the positive c axis, justifying the convention used in our work.

Figure 3. Magnetoelectric effect, and the associated ionic shifts.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Magnetic field dependence of magnetization M(H) and polarization P(H) at T = 55 K. Numbers and arrows indicate the measurement sequence. The insert in (b) shows the magnetic orders and the ferrimagnetic moments of the Fe-O layers for the phases involved. (c) The calculated ionic shifts for the paramagnetic to AFM transition. Thick arrow represents the corresponding change of the electric polarization, ΔP. (d) the same as (c), but for the AFM to FRM transition.

The calculated ionic shifts also allow to get an insight into the mechanism of the ME effect. The atoms shift to maximize the magnetic energy gains in the AFM and FRM states. Oxygen ions exhibit the largest shifts, and therefore the ME energy gains should be associated with the modifications of the superexchange paths between the interacting Fe2+ spins. Lattice structure, as well as preservation of the in-plane magnetic order in applied magnetic field imply that the largest magnetic coupling (J) is between the nearest Fe2+ ions, see Fig. 1(b). The calculations show that upon the transition from the paramagnetic to the AFM state, the Fe-O-Fe angle (θ) between the nearest Fe2+ increases from 109° to ~111°, mostly due to the oxygen shifts, see Fig. 1(d). The in-plane antiferromagnetic J increases with increasing θ due to the more favorable Fe-O-Fe orbital overlap, resulting in the magnetic energy gain. Thus, we ascribe the ionic shifts, as well as the accompanying ΔP, to the exchange striction in the AFM state.

The FRM state can be induced both by a positive and a negative magnetic field along the c axis. The two states differ only by 180° rotation of every spin in the system. While the field-induced magnetizations should be opposite for the opposite fields, ΔP induced by exchange striction should be identical. This prediction is clearly confirmed by the data of Fig. 3(a,b). The calculated ionic shifts for the AFM to FRM transition, shown in Fig. 3(d), are opposite (but smaller) to those occurring at the PARA to AFM transition, see Fig. 3(c). In other words, the lattice partially relaxes towards the paramagnetic structure in the FRM state. This is consistent with the magnetic energy loss due to the interlayer interactions in the FRM phase, and corresponding relaxation of the lattice distortion realized in the AFM state. As a result, ΔP is negative in the AFM to FRM transition. Thus, the data of Fig. 3(b), in combination with our first principles calculations, show that exchange striction underlies the ME effect in the transition to the FRM state, as in the AFM transition discussed above.

The sharpness of the field-induced transitions shown in Figs 2(d) and 3(a,b) gives rise to giant values of the differential ME coefficient dP/dH in the vicinity of the transition field, reaching almost −104 ps/m for T = 55 K. (Consult Supplementary Fig. 2(d) for the field-dependent dP/dH for different temperatures). Combined with absence of poling requirements and the small hysteresis (0.02 T at 55 K, 0.007 T at 58 K), it leads to giant, reproducible, and almost linear variation of P with H, as shown in Fig. 4(a) for T = 55 K. In the range shown, ΔP oscillates, varying by 0.08 μC/cm2 as H goes from 3.25 to 3.5 T and back. The inverse effect, in which an applied electric field (E) changes the magnetization is also giant, reproducible, and linear, as shown in Fig. 4(b). At T = 55 K and H = 3.345 T, the magnetization varies by 0.35 μB/f.u. in the field oscillating between ±16.6 kV/cm, resulting in the dM/dE of −5700 ps/m. Similarly large differential ME coefficients dP/dH and dM/dE are observed at other points on the AFM-FRM transition boundary shown in Fig. 4(c). These coefficients are more than an order of magnitude larger than those reported for the polar magnet Ni3TeO6 (ref. 24), see Fig. 4(d).

Figure 4. Reproducible magnetoelectric control of the electric polarization and magnetization with giant ME coefficients.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Periodic modulation of electric polarization (blue) induced by a magnetic field linearly varying between 3.25 T and 3.5 T (black) at 55 K. (b) Periodic modulation of magnetization (green) induced by an electric field (red) linearly varying between ±16.6 kV/cm, for T = 55 K and Inline graphic = 3.345 T. (c) Phase diagram of Fe2Mo3O8. Black dots determined from M(H), and red diamonds – from χ(T) curves. (d) Electric field dependence of magnetization for Fe2Mo3O8 (from panel (b), averaged), and for Ni3TeO6 (×10). The insert illustrates the experimental setup, with directions of the applied fields shown. In all figures, the magnetization, polarization, and the applied fields are along the c axis.

When both external fields H and E are collinear and their direction coincides with the positive c axis of the crystal, both ΔP and ΔM are negative in applied positive H and E, respectively. Thus, both dP/dH and dM/dE are negative. The data of Fig. 3(a,b) show that, consistent with exchange striction mechanism, ΔM changes sign in negative H, while ΔP does not. As a result, both dP/dH and dM/dE change their sign and become positive in negative H and E, while retaining the same magnitudes. This sign reversal is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 4.

In conclusion, polar magnets clearly possess a great potential as ME materials. The absence of poling requirements makes possible utilization of giant ME coefficients associated with sharp metamagnetic transitions practical, because reproducible, hysteresis-free linear responses can be achieved, as necessary for applications. In Fe2Mo3O8, hidden ferrimagnetism of the Fe-O layers strongly enhances the magnetic response at the transition field, providing explanation for the observed giant differential ME coefficients. Exchange striction mechanism of the ME effect in Fe2Mo3O8 provides an additional functional capability of controlling the sign of these coefficients by the direction of the applied “bias” magnetic field. Therefore, studies of other polar magnets, especially with exchange striction ME mechanism and local ferrimagnetism, are, in our opinion, of significant promise.

Methods

Single crystal preparation and structure analysis

Fe2Mo3O8 single crystals were grown using a chemical vapor transport method at 1000 °C for 10 days, followed by furnace cooling. They are black hexagonal plates with typical size ~1 × 1 × 0.5 mm3. Powder X-ray diffraction measurement was performed on crushed powders of Fe2Mo3O8 single crystals. Refinement shows that the room-temperature space group is P63mc. a- and c- lattice constants are 5.773(3) and 10.054(3) Å, respectively.

Measurements

All measurements of magnetic properties M(H), χ(T) and M(E) were performed in a Quantum Design MPMS-XL7. The dielectric constant ε(T), specific heat CP(T), electric polarization P(T) and P(H) properties were performed using Quantum Design PPMS-9. ε(T) was measured with 1 V a.c. electric field applied along the c axis using a Quadtech 7600 LCR meter at 44 kHZ. Specific heat measurements were conducted using the standard relaxation method. P(T) and P(H) were obtained by integrating the pyroelectric current J(T) and magnetoelectric current J(H), which were measured using Keithely 617 programmable electrometer at 5 K/min warming rate and ramping magnetic field with 200 Oe/s.

First principles calculations

Ab-initio calculations were performed using the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) method as implemented in the WIEN2k code35 within the framework of density functional theory36,37. The electronic, magnetic and structural properties of Fe2Mo3O8 were calculated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for the exchange-correlation potential, in the form of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof38,39 (PBE) plus an on-site Coulomb self-interaction correction potential (U) treated by DFT + U, and the double-counting in the fully localized limit40. Since the symmetry of low temperature crystal structure is not known, the point group symmetry of the hexagonal paramagnetic space group P63mc (ref. 31) was artificially reduced for the purpose of optimizations of internal parameters (OIP). All the calculations were done in the triclinic space group P1, with the lattice parameters kept fixed to a = b = 5.773 Å, c = 10.054 Å, α = 90°, β = 90°, γ = 120°. OIP were performed with imposed AFM and FRM magnetic configurations, using as the initial guess the experimentally determined internal parameters of the paramagnetic phase31. The search for equilibrium ionic positions was carried out by means of the PORT method41 with a force tolerance ≤0.5 mRy/Bohr. The calculations were performed with more than 200 k-points in the irreducible wedge of the Brillouin zone (10 × 10 × 4 mesh). The total energy, charge and force convergence criteria were ~10−4 Ry, ~10−4 electrons and 0.25 mRy/Bohr, respectively. The muffin-tin radii RMT were chosen as 1.90, 1.93 and 1.66 bohr for Mo, Fe and O, respectively. To ensure that no charge leaks outside the atomic spheres, we have chosen the energy which separates the core and the valence states to be −10 Ry, thus treating the Mo(4s, 4p, 4d, 5s), Fe(3s, 3p, 3d, 4s) and O(2s, 2p) electrons as valence states. All other input parameters were used with their default values.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wang, Y. et al. Unveiling hidden ferrimagnetism and giant magnetoelectricity in polar magnet Fe2Mo3O8. Sci. Rep. 5, 12268; doi: 10.1038/srep12268 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep12268-s1.pdf (812KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by DOE under Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER46382. K.H. (theory) was supported by NSF-DMR 1405303. Heat capacity measurements at NJIT (T.A.T.) were supported by DOE under Grant DE-FG02-07ER46402. The PPMS (used for heat capacity measurements) was acquired under NSF MRI Grant DMR-0923032 (ARRA award). Discussions with Karin M. Rabe are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.Z.W. carried out magnetoelectric, magnetic and dielectric measurements. T.A.T. performed the heat capacity measurement. B.G. synthesized single crystals and performed X.R.D. G.L.P. developed the theoretical model under the supervision of K.H., Y.Z.W., G.L.P., V.K. and S.-W.C. wrote the manuscript. S.-W.C. initiated and supervised the research.

References

  1. Choi Y. J., Zhang C. L., Lee N. & Cheong S. W. Cross-Control of Magnetization and Polarization by Electric and Magnetic Fields with Competing Multiferroic and Weak-Ferromagnetic Phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 097201 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aoyama T. et al. Giant spin-driven ferroelectric polarization in TbMnO3 under high pressure. Nat. Commun. 5, 4927 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sahoo S. et al. Ferroelectric control of magnetism in BaTiO3/Fe heterostructures via interface strain coupling. Phys. Rev. B 76, 092108 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. Jia C., Onoda S., Nagaosa N. & Han J. H. Microscopic theory of spin-polarization coupling in multiferroic transition metal oxides. Phys. Rev. B 76, 144424 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. Sergienko I. A. & Dagotto E. Role of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in multiferroic perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  6. Tokunaga Y., Taguchi Y., Arima T. & Tokura Y. Electric-field-induced generation and reversal of ferromagnetic moment in ferrites. Nat. Phys. 8, 838–844 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. Roundy C. B. & Byer R. L. Sensitive LiTaO3 pyroelectric detector. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 929–931 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  8. Ju S., Cai T.-Y., Guo G.-Y. & Li Z.-Y. Electrically controllable spin filtering and switching in multiferroic tunneling junctions. Phys. Rev. B 75, 064419 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. Eerenstein W., Mathur N. D. & Scott J. F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 442, 759–765 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kimura T. et al. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature 426, 55–58 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheong S. W. & Mostovoy M. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 6, 13–20 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glass A. M. Dielectric, Thermal, and Pyroelectric Properties of Ferroelectric LiTaO3. Phys. Rev. 172, 564–571 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  13. Dvořák L., Kovář M. & Černý S. A new approach to adsorption microcalorimetry based on a LiTaO3 pyroelectric temperature sensor and a pulsed molecular beam. Thermochim. Acta 245, 163–171 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jyh-Jier H. et al. A high sensitivity lead-titanate (PbTiO3) pyroelectric thin-film infrared sensor with temperature isolation improvement structure. Electron Device Lett. 19, 189–191 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowen C. R. et al. Pyroelectric materials and devices for energy harvesting applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3836–3856 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Radaelli P. G. et al. Electric field switching of antiferromagnetic domains in YMn2O5: A probe of the multiferroic mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 067205 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Curie P. Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique. J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 3, 393–415 (1894). [Google Scholar]
  18. Windsch, Freeman W. A. J., Schmid H. Magnetoelectric interaction phenomena in crystals. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers London 1975. Kristall und Technik 11, K45–K45 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  19. Folen V. J., Rado G. T. & Stalder E. W. Anisotropy of the Magnetoelectric Effect in Cr2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 607–608 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  20. Astrov D. Magnetoelectric effect in chromium oxide. Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 729–733 (1961). [Google Scholar]
  21. Gajek M. et al. Tunnel junctions with multiferroic barriers. Nat. Mater. 6, 296–302 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chu Y.-H. et al. Electric-field control of local ferromagnetism using a magnetoelectric multiferroic. Nat. Mater. 7, 478–482 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee N. et al. Giant Tunability of Ferroelectric Polarization in GdMn2O5. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 137203 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oh Y. S. et al. Non-hysteretic colossal magnetoelectricity in a collinear antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 5, 3201 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fiebig M., Lottermoser T., Frohlich D., Goltsev A. V. & Pisarev R. V. Observation of coupled magnetic and electric domains. Nature 419, 818–820 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim J. Y., Koo T. Y. & Park J. H. Orbital and Bonding Anisotropy in a Half-Filled GaFeO3 Magnetoelectric Ferrimagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 047205 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cheong S. W., Thompson J. D. & Fisk Z. Metamagnetism In La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 39, 4395–4398 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. de Groot J. et al. Competing Ferri- and Antiferromagnetic Phases in Geometrically Frustrated LuFe2O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 037206 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McAlister S. P. & Strobel P. Magnetic order in M2Mo3O8 single crystals (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 30, 340–348 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  30. Sasaki A., Yui S. & Yamaguchi M. Kamiokite, Fe2Mo3O8, a new mineral. Mineral. J. 12, 393–399 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  31. Le Page Y. & Strobel P. Structure of iron(II) molybdenum(IV) oxide Fe2Mo3O8. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 38, 1265–1267 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  32. Czeskleba H., Imbert P. & Varret F. Mössbauer Study of Fe2Mo3O8 and FeZnMo3O8. AIP Conference Proceedings 5, 811–815 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  33. Varret F., Czeskleba H., Hartmann-Boutron F. & Imbert P. Étude par effet Mössbauer de l’ion Fe2+ en symétrie trigonale dans les composés du type (Fe, M)2Mo3O8 (M = Mg, Zn, Mn, Co, Ni) et propriétés magnétiques de (Fe, Zn)2Mo3O8. J. Phys. France 33, 549–564 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  34. King-Smith R. D. & Vanderbilt D. Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651–1654 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Blaha P., Schwarz K., Madsen G. K. H., Kvasnicka D. & Luitz J. WIEN2K, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties. (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universität Wien, Austria, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  36. Hohenberg P. & Kohn W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  37. Kohn W. & Sham L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  38. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396–1396 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Anisimov V. I., Solovyev I. V., Korotin M. A., Czyżyk M. T. & Sawatzky G. A. Density-functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra. Phys. Rev. B 48, 16929–16934 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. PORT is a method implemented in the WIEN2K code for finding the equilibrium positions by minimization of the total energy; for further details see the WIEN2K User Guide.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep12268-s1.pdf (812KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES