Abstract
Renal fibrosis is a main cause of chronic renal failure. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers play a role in renal fibrosis. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) has been shown to initiate and complete the whole EMT process. It is now well accepted that loss of E-cadherin, EMT marker α-SMA, and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression are key events in the EMT process. We found that by stimulating human renal proximal tubular epithelial (HK-2) cells with TGF-β1, the expression of E-cadherin was down regulated and the expression of α-SMA and CTGF were up regulated in a dose dependent manner. In our present study we also found that integrin β4 and peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) play roles in EMT process, with TGF-β1 stimulation increasing integrin β4 expression in HK2 cells. Integrin β4 and PPARγ were detected in tubulointerstitial tissues, immunohistochemistry analysis showed enhanced expression of integrin β4 in early stage, with over-expression at later stage. In contrast, the expression of PPARγ showed little increased in early stage, but was dramatically decreased at later stage. This is consistent with TGF-β1 inducing EMT. Our immune-precipitation studies show that integrin β4 disassociation with PPARγ is present in E-cadherin signaling. It suggests that PPARγ has a role in EMT inhibition.
Keywords: Integrin β4, PPARγ, EMT, renal diseases
Introduction
Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) is a multifunctional factor that regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, adhesion and migration, and induces the production of extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) [1]. Physiological levels of TGF-β1 are thought to be essential for normal development, tissue repair and maintenance of organ function. TGF-β1 has in anti-inflammatory actions in glomerular cells through the inhibition of mitogenesis and cytokine responses, and the suppression of accumulation and function of infiltrating cells. The overexpression of TGF-β1 has been linked with pathological alterations characteristic of various kidney diseases. In human glomerular disease, TGF-β1 has been reported as a key molecule that contributes to glomerulosclerosis [2]. It has been found that the urinary levels of TGF-β1 are elevated in patients with various renal diseases, increasing the amounts of interstitial fibrosis and mesangial matrix found. It has also been known that upregulated TGF-β1stimulates the production of matrix proteins, decreases the activity of ECM-degrading proteinases and upregulates the synthesis of proteinase inhibitors, leading to excessive matrix deposition [2]. This suggests that TGF-β1 initiates a variety of pathophysiological processes early during kidney injury, including tubular epithelial cell apoptosis, intrinsic cell dedifferentiation, ECM deposition, and the development of renal fibrosis [3]. Progressive renal damage causes glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, infiltration of inflammatory mediators and the activation of α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts. This acts as the final common pathway characteristic of all kidney diseases leading to chronic renal failure [4,5].
It has been reported that TGF-β1 can control expression of αv, β4, and β1 integrin subunits in different cell type [8-13]. TGF-β1 signaling can also directly activate β1-integrin and induce cross-talk between different integrin and growth factor receptors. This includes the activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-dependent clustering of ErbB2 (HER2) and integrin α6, β1, and β4 through a pathwayinitiated by epithelium growth factor receptor-dependent phosphorylation.
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process of epithelial cells losing their phenotypic markers and characteristics and acquiring the phenotypic features of mesenchymal cells. EMT is defined by four key events: (i) loss of epithelial cell adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin, (ii) α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression, (iii) enhanced cell migration and invasion of the interstitium [6,7]. It is clear that the well-described phenomenon of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in embryonic development, wound healing, tissue regeneration, and organ fibrosis and cancer progression.
We have previously found that TGF-β1 induced EMT by agonistic activation of PPARγ in human proximal tubule epithelial cells. Stimulation of human renal proximal tubular epithelial (HK-2) cells with TGF-β1 decreased E-cadherin and PPAR-γ expression level and increased connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) protein expression [14].
The mechanism of TGF-β1 induced EMT is not clear. We therefore specifically examined the role of E-cadherin, PPARγ and integrin β4 in EMT and renal fibrosis. We hypothesize that TGF-β1 induces EMT by agonistic activation of PPARγ mediated by E-cadherin and integrin β4.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and treatment
Immortalized human proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2) were obtained from Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (Shenzhen, China) and cultured as described previously [14]. Between passages 3 to 20, cells were plated in culture medium on 6-well plates on 1.5×106 cells/well and allowed to grow for 48 hours. For cell treatment, starve cells 24 hours in medium without serum; and then cultured cells in DMEM containing TGF-β1 (R&D System, USA) in 0 ng/ml, 1 ng/ml, 3 ng/ml or 9 ng/ml for another 48 hours.
Human Embryonic Kidney 293 cells (HEK 293) were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) and were grown in DMEM, supplemented with 10% calf serum or 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT). The expression of E-cadherin in pcDNA3 vector was transfected into HEK 293 cells. After selection as described [16], stable cell line was obtained.
RT-PCR and gene expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated by reverse transcription 500 ng ofImmunostainingtotal RNA in a reaction volume of 10 ul random hexamers as a priming agent with PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TAKARA, CHN). One microliters of cDNA was used as template in 20 ul PCR reaction. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using Roche LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TAKARA, CHN). The number of PCR cycles used was determined to be within the linear range of the reactions. Sequences of primers and predicted PCR product sizes were shown as Table 1. Reactions were performed in at least triplicate and analyzed via relativequantitation with data as average fold change compared to no treatment of TGF-β1.
Table 1.
Primers usedfor RT-PCR amplification in thepresent study*
| Target | Sequence | Size (bp) | Annealing (°C) | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-cad | 5’-CCCCCATACCAGAACCTCGAA-3’ | 270 | 60 | 40 |
| 5’-TTCTGGTTATCCATGAGCTTGAGA-3’ | ||||
| Intergrin β4 | 5’-CGGACATGAGGCCTGAGAAG-3’ | 177 | 60 | 30 |
| 5’-TCTGCAGGATGGCATCGAAG-3’ | ||||
| α-SMA | 5’-AACTGTGAATGTCCTGTG-3’ | 80 | 60 | 30 |
| 5’-CATAGGTAACGAGTCAGAG-3’ | ||||
| CTGF | 5’-TCATCAAGACCTGTGCCTGCCA-3’ | 230 | 60 | 30 |
| 5’-GGGTGGGAATCTTTTCCCCCAGT-3’ | ||||
| GAPDH | 5’-CTCCGGGAAACTGTGGCGTG-3’ | 351 | 60 | 30 |
| 5’-ACAAAGTGGTCGTTGAGGGCA-3 |
E-cad: E-cadherin; Intergrin β4: Integrin Beta4; α-SMA: α-Smooth muscle actin; CTGF: Connective Tissue Growth Factor; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase.
Immuno-staining
Cells were washed twice in CMF-PBS and fixed for 12 hours in CMF-PBS + 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C, followed by 3times washes in PBS and blocking with PBS containing peroxidase inhibitor (MAIXIN, CHN) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Cells were incubated with 5 μg/ml mAb 3E1 (hybridoma facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY) diluted in blocking buffer for 12 hours at 4°C, washed four times with PBS, and incubated for 1 hour with anti-mouse IgG (2 μg/ml) conjugated with Alex488 (Invitrogen, USA) in blocking buffer, followed by five washes with PBS before mounting in Immumount (Shando. Images were acquired by using Leica DM4000 fluorescent microscope (Germany).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
The kidney tissues were obtained from 45 patients biopsy during 2013-2014 from the department of pathology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. Kidney tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. All tissues were routinely stained with Hematoxilin & Eosin (H&E) and analyzed by a pathologist. According to the degree of tubulointerstitial lesion, kidney specimens were divided into 3 groups: mild lesion group (the tubulointerstitial lesion degree <25%), moderate lesion group (25%-50%), and severe lesion group (>50%). We used normal kidney portions as controls from two patients with localized clear cell carcinoma and from a patient underwent nephrectomy because of renal trauma.
For immunohistochemistry, slides were deparaffinized in xylene and ehydrated sequentially in ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH6.0) for 30 minutes. Slides were quenched in peroxidase blocking reagent for another 30 minutes to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Slides were blocked with blocking buffer (PBS containing 10% goat serum), and then were incubated in diluted primary antibodies mouse anti-human integrin β4 (1:200) (Abcam) and PPARγ (Invitrogen) in PBS overnight at 4°C followed by incubation in secondary antibody goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (1:250) (Invitrogen) at 37°C in the dark for one hour. Between each step, slides were washed with PBS adequately. After washing, kidney tissues were double-stained with DAPI (LBP Medicine Science & Technology).
Images were acquired by a Nikon Eclipse (Nikon, Apidrag, Romania) microscope, equipped with a 5-megapixels CCD digital videocamera. Consecutive images, avoiding glomeruli, were recorded from the whole renal biopsy tissue at ×200 magnification.
Co-immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitations were carried in a manner similar as described [17]. Cells (8×106) were washed once with washing buffer (50 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl and 10 mM EDTA, pH7.4), then lysed for 30 min on ice in 1% Triton X-100 containing a 1:1000 dilution of protease inhibitor mixture set III (Calbiochem, USA) in washing buffer. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000× g for 30 min at 4°C. Cell lysates (1 mg of protein/ reaction determined by a BCA assay) were incubated at 4°C overnight with 10 µg/ml anti-PPARγ, Integrin β4, or E-cadherin antibodies or mouse IgG as negative control. Immune complexes were precipitated with 50 µl of GammaBind-Sepharose and washed with washing buffer. Samples were resolved by electrophoresis under reduced conditions on a 10% Laemmli gel [18], transferred to Immobilon P, and then probed with primary antibody followed by an alkaline phosphataseconjugated secondary antibody. Visualization of immunoreactive bands was performed using ECF reagent (GE Healthcare) and scanned on a Storm PhosphorImager (GE Healthcare).
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard derivation. Unless stated, statistical significance was determined using Student›s t-test and statistical significance was achieved when the p value was <0.05.
Results
TGF-β1 decreased mRNA levels of E-cad and increased mRNA levels of α-SMA and CTFG in HK2 cells
In our previous study, we found that HK-2 cells were treated with TGF-β1 (3 ng/ml) 48 hours; the expression of EMT markers, α-SMA and CTGF were increased but E-cad decreased; loss of epithelial cell adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin was a key event of EMT. So the results was consistent the pattern of TGF-β1 induced EMT [14].
In present study, we treated HK-2 cells with TGF-β1 48 hours in different concentration (1, 3 or 9 ng/ml), E-cad, α-SMA and CTFG mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR assay. E-cadherin expression was dramatic decreased by TGF-β1treatment. TGF-β1 triggered significant increases of α-SMA and CTGF expression in dose-dependent manner (Figure 1). It was confirmed that TGF-β1 induced EMT in HK2 cells.
Figure 1.

Measurement of mRNA level for E-cad, α-SMA and CTGF in absence or presence of TGF-β1 stimulation. The quantification of mRNA level of E-cad, α-SMA and CTGF by RT-PCR were shown by measurement in absence or presence of TGF-β1 (0, 1, 3 and 9 ng/ml) stimulation. Data were represented in triplicate experiments ± S.D.
TGF-β1 decreased protein expression level of E-cad and increased protein expression level of α-SMA in HK2 cells
To further understand TGF-β1 up-regulating α-SMA expression and down-regulating E-cadherin expression, we were observing the protein expression pattern in TGF-β1 stimulation by using immune fluorescence staining. It had been found that E-cadherin expression level decreased according TGF-β1 stimulation with dose dependent manner; EMT marker, α-SMA, expression level increased and also showed TGF-β1 dose dependent (Figure 2). It was consistency with mRNA level.
Figure 2.

Immunofluorescence labelling of HK-2 cells for detecting expression of E-cadherin and α-SMA. Labelling HK-2 cells with mouse anti-human E-cadherin or mouse anti-human α-SMA followed by donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 for α-SMA or goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 for E-cad in non-stimulation or stimulation with TGF-β1 (1, 3 and 9 ng/ml). Bar 20 μm.
TGF-β1 increased protein expression level of integrin β4 in HK2 cells
It had been reported that overexpression of integrin β4 promoted cell scattering and cell motility in combination with down-regulation of E-cadherin and up-regulation of Vimentin expression in the regulation of cancer invasion and EMT [19,20]. High levels of integrin β4 expression correlated significantly with the histological hallmarks.
To validate the association between expression levels of integrin β4 and EMT in TGF-β1 stimulation, immune staining assay was used. We found TGF-β1 stimulation increased integrin β4 expression in HK2 cells (Figure 3). It was shown TGF-β1 dose dependent. HK2 cells had a high degree of solitary cell infiltration with TGF-β1 stimulation.
Figure 3.

Immunofluorescence labelling of HK-2 cells for detecting expression of integrin β4. Labelling HK-2 cells with mouse anti-human integrin β4 followed by donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 in stimulation with TGF-β1 (1, 3 and 9 ng/ml). Bar 20 μm.
Integrin β4 over-expression and PPARγ low-expression in the later stage at renal disease
To clarify overexpression of integrin β4 and low expression of PPARγ in renal disease, we examined overall 45 patients with renal diseases. The tubulointerstitial tissues were obtained by biopsy.
Further Histology and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed; integrin β4 and PPARγ were detected in tubulointerstitial tissues (Figure 4). Intriguingly, immunohistochemistry analysis showed enhanced expression of integrin β4 in early stage of renal tubular epithelial cell lesions (mild lesion group), but it was over-expression at later stage of renal tubular epithelial cell lesions (moderate lesion group and severe lesion group). In contrast, the expression of PPARγ was increased lightly in early stage, but it was dramatically decreased at later stage. It is consistency with TGF-β1 inducing EMT.
Figure 4.

Detection of integrin β4 and PPARγ in renal tissue with immunohistochemistry analysis. It showed enhanced expression of integrin β4 in early stage of renal tubular epithelial cell lesions (mild lesion group), but it was over-expression in later stage of renal tubular epithelial cell lesions (moderate lesion group and severe lesion group) comparing mIgG control (Negative control). In contrast, the expression of PPARγ increased lightly in early stage, but it decreased at later stage.
High levels of integrin β4 expression and low level of PPARγ expression are significantly correlated with EMT by TGF-β1 stimulation.
TGF-β1 signaling pathway involved integrin β4, PPARr and E-cadherin
Based on the TGF-β1 induced EMT in HK2 cells and the over-expression of integrin β4 and low-expression of PPARγ in tubulointerstitial tissues, we try to understand the relationship of those molecules PPARγ, integrin β4 and E-cadherin.
In our co-immunopreciptation analysis, HEK293 cell line was used. PPARγ captured integrin β4. With E-cadherin transfected HEK293 cells, E-cadherin blocked PPARγ capturing integrin β4 (Figure 5). In present E-cadherin, PPARγ dis-associated with integrin β4 and associated with E-cadherin (Figure 5). It was very interesting that the interaction between integrin β4 and PPARγ was interfered by E-cadherin.
Figure 5.

Integrin β4 immuno-precipitation with PPARγ or E-cadherin HEK293 cells or transfected with E-cadherin HEK 293 cells were cultured in serum were extracted and subjected to immune-precipitation (IP) using anti-integrin β4, anti-E-cadherin or anti-PPARγ antibody. The immune-precipitates were analyzed on Western blots by probing with these antibodies. Upper penal, anti-integrin β4 used as a probe to detect PPARγ and E-cad expression of HEK293 cells and HEK293-E-cad cells, in order to understand the interaction between integrin β4 and PPARγ; lower penal, anti-E-cad used as a probe to detect PPARγ and integrin β4 expression of HEK293 cells and HEK293-E-cad cells, in order to observe whether the corelation of integrin β4 and PPARγ was influenced by E-cad.
Discussion
It is now well accepted that loss of E-cadherin and EMT marker of α-SMA and CTGF expression are key events in EMT. In our previous study, we found PPARγ were involved in EMT [14].
Integrin β4 is a laminin 332 receptor that forms hemidesmosomes in epithelial cells [26-29]. In tumor cells, overexpression of the integrin promotes the proliferation, survival, and invasion of the tumor cells [30-32]. It is a novel report that integrin β4 also plays a role in the regulation of EMT.
Our immune-precipitation studies showed that integrin β4 associated PPARγ to form a complex but the association can be blocked by adding E-cadherin, suggesting that change of E-cadherin during EMT has effects in functions of PPARγ and integrin β4, however the mechanism are required more investigation. Initiated by TGF-β1, epithelial or endothelial cells lose their cell-cell contacts (loss E-cadherin) and begin to express mesenchymal markers (α-SMA etc.) that undergo EMT, also TGF-β1 induces extracellular matrix expression that contributes to tissue inflammation and cell transdifferentiation [33]. In the interstitium, these cells disengage themselves from the cell connective and transdifferentiate to interstitial myofibroblasts, which are responsible for the increased synthesis of ECM leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis (Figure 6 modified after [35]). In the glomerulus, the TGF-β1 induced biochemical changes in the cells contribute to excessive ECM deposition and podocyte loss, characteristics of glomerulosclerosis.
Figure 6.

Schematic model of function of TGF-β1 and PPARγ in EMT. Stimulated by TGF-β1, epithelialcells lose cell-cell contacts, E-cadherin. The EMT marker, such as α-SMA etc, was expressed and induced Integrin β4 over-expression. It leads to tubulointerstitial fibrosis. PPARγ inhibits this procedure.
Fibrosis is the end result of chronic inflammatory reactions induced by a variety of stimuli including persistent infections, autoimmune reactions, allergic responses and tissue injury. We have shown that renaldiseaseis related with PPARγ and integrin β4 with our immunohistochemistry assay. In later stages of renal disease, PPARγ expression is decreased while integrin β4 is over-expression.
TGF-β1 thus potentially offers a number of molecular targets for the treatment of renal diseases. Since TGF-β1 is upregulated in almost all progressive renal diseases, TGF-β1-suppressing treatments appear promising [34]. Activation of PPARγ and inhibition integrin β4 has also been considered in the treatment of in chronic kidney disease as a result of renal fibrosis [36]. In addition, several other strategies of TGF-β inhibition have been proven to be effective in the treatment of kidney diseases resulting from tissue fibrosis [37-40].
Acknowledgements
This study was partly supported by The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (project S2013040015040) and a key issue grants from Shenzhen Branch Trade Industry and Information Commission.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Dennler S, Goumans MJ, ten Dijke P. Transforming growth factor beta signal transduction. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;71:731–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kitamura M, Sütö TS. TGF-beta and glomerulonephritis: anti-inflammatory versus prosclerotic actions. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12:669–679. doi: 10.1093/ndt/12.4.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wen X, Murugan R, Peng Z, Kellum JA. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury: a new perspective. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;165:39–45. doi: 10.1159/000313743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hills CE, Squires PE. The role of TGF-β and epithelial- to mesenchymal transition in diabetic nephropathy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zeisberg M, Neilson EG. Mechanisms of tubulointerstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:1819–1834. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010080793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang J, Liu Y. Dissection of key events in tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition and its implications in renal interstitial fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:1465–1475. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu Y. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1–12. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000106015.29070.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu H, Radisky DC, Yang D, Xu R, Radisky ES, Bissell MJ, Bishop JM. MYC suppresses cancer metastasis by direct transcriptional silencing of alphav and beta3 integrin subunits. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:567–574. doi: 10.1038/ncb2491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pechkovsky DV, Scaffidi AK, Hackett TL, Ballard J, Shaheen F, Thompson PJ, Thannickal VJ, Knight DA. Transforming growth factor beta1 induces alphavbeta3 integrin expression in human lung fibroblasts via a beta3 integrin-, c-Src-, p38 MAPK-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12898–12908. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708226200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yeh YC, Wei WC, Wang YK, Lin SC, Sung JM, Tang MJ. Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces Smad3-dependent beta1 integrin gene expression in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition during chronic tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1743–1754. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yeh YY, Chiao CC, Kuo WY, Hsiao YC, Chen YJ, Wei YY, Lai TH, Fong YC, Tang CH. TGF-beta1 increases motility and alphavbeta3 integrin upregulation via PI3K, Akt and NF-kappaB-dependent pathway in humanchondrosarcoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:1292–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fransvea E, Mazzocca A, Antonaci S, Giannelli G. Targeting transforming growth factor (TGF)-betaRI inhibits activation of beta1 integrin and blocks vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49:839–850. doi: 10.1002/hep.22731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang YJ, Tian ZL, Yu XY, Zhao XX, Yao L. Activation of integrin beta1-focal adhesion kinase- RasGTP pathway plays a critical role in TGF beta1-induced podocyte injury. Cell Signal. 2013;25:2769–2779. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen YM, Luo Q, Xiong ZB, Liang W, Chen L, Xiong ZY. Telmisartan counteracts TGF-β1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via PPAR-γ in human proximal tubule epithelial cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:522–529. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang HC, Hu HC, Tang MC, Wang WS, Chen PM, Su Y. Thymosin beta4 triggers anepithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal carcinoma by upregulatingintegrin-linked kinase. Oncogene. 2007;26:2781–2790. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang H, Leavitt L, Ramaswamy R, Rapraeger AC. Interaction ofSyndecan andalpha6beta4 integrin Cytoplasmic Domains. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13569–13579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.102137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beauvais DM, Burbach BJ, Rapraeger AC. The syndecan-1 ectodomain regulatesalphavbeta3 integrin activity in human mammary carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:171–181. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200404171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head ofbacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Emoto K, Effendi K, Tsujikawa H, Kitago M, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Sakamoto M. Upregulation of integrin β4 promotesepithelial-mesenchymal transition and is a novel prognostic marker in pancreaticductal adenocarcinoma. Lab Invest. 2015;95:308–319. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang HC, Hu HC, Tang MC, Wang WS, Chen PM, Su Y. Thymosin beta4 triggers an epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal carcinoma by upregulating integrin-linked kinase. Oncogene. 2007;26:2781–2790. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steffes MW, Osterby R, Chavers B, Mauer SM. Mesangial expansion as a central mechanism for loss of kidney function in diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1989;38:1077–1081. doi: 10.2337/diab.38.9.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zeisberg M, Kalluri R. The role of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in renal fibrosis. J Mol Med (Berl) 2004;82:175–181. doi: 10.1007/s00109-003-0517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kalluri R, Neilson EG. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1776–1784. doi: 10.1172/JCI20530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zavadil J, Böttinger EP. TGF-beta and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene. 2005;24:5764–5774. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Willis BC, Borok Z. TGF-beta-induced EMT: mechanisms and implications for fibrotic lung disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293:L525–L534. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00163.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wilhelmsen K, Litjens SH, Sonnenberg A. Multiple functions of the integrin alpha6beta4 in epidermal homeostasis and tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:2877–2886. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.2877-2886.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marinkovich MP. Tumour microenvironment: laminin 332 in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:370–380. doi: 10.1038/nrc2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mercurio AM, Rabinovitz I. Towards a mechanistic understanding of tumor invasion--lessons from the alpha6beta 4 integrin. Semin Cancer Biol. 2001;11:129–141. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2000.0364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aumailley M, Rousselle P. Laminins of the dermoepidermal junction. Matrix Biol. 1999;18:19–28. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(98)00004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Falcioni R, Antonini A, Nisticò P, Di Stefano S, Crescenzi M, Natali PG, Sacchi A. Alpha 6 beta 4 and alpha 6 beta 1 integrins associate with ErbB-2 in human carcinoma cell lines. Exp Cell Res. 1997;236:76–85. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mariotti A, Kedeshian PA, Dans M, Curatola AM, Gagnoux-Palacios L, Giancotti FG. EGF-R signaling through Fyn kinase disrupts the function of integrinalpha6 beta4 at hemidesmosomes: role in epithelial cell migration and carcinomainvasion. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:447–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trusolino L, Bertotti A, Comoglio PM. A signaling adapter function for alpha6 beta4 integrin in the control of HGF-dependent invasive growth. Cell. 2001;107:643–654. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00567-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cichon MA, Radisky DC. Extracellular matrix as a contextual determinant oftransforming growth factor-β signaling in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and in cancer. Cell Adh Migr. 2014;8:588–594. doi: 10.4161/19336918.2014.972788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sharma K, McGowan TA. TGF-beta in diabetic kidney disease: role of novel signaling pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2000;11:115–123. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(99)00035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Loeffler I, Wolf G. Transforming growth factor-β and the progression of renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:i45–i54. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharma K, McGowan TA. TGF-beta in diabetic kidney disease: role of novel signaling pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2000;11:115–123. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(99)00035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kasuga H, Ito Y, Sakamoto S, Kawachi H, Shimizu F, Yuzawa Y, Matsuo S. Effects of anti-TGF-beta type II receptor antibody on experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1745–1755. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fukasawa H, Yamamoto T, Suzuki H, Togawa A, Ohashi N, Fujigaki Y, Uchida C, Aoki M, Hosono M, Kitagawa M, Hishida A. Treatment with anti-TGF-beta antibodyameliorates chronic progressive nephritis by inhibiting Smad/TGF-beta signaling. Kidney Int. 2004;65:63–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Petersen M, Thorikay M, Deckers M, van Dinther M, Grygielko ET, Gellibert F, de Gouville AC, Huet S, ten Dijke P, Laping NJ. Oral administration of GW788388, an inhibitor of TGF-beta type I and II receptor kinases, decreasesrenal fibrosis. Kidney Int. 2008;73:705–715. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang B, Koh P, Winbanks C, Coughlan MT, McClelland A, Watson A, Jandeleit-Dahm K, Burns WC, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, Kantharidis P. miR-200a Prevents renalfibrogenesis through repression of TGF-β2 expression. Diabetes. 2011;60:280–287. doi: 10.2337/db10-0892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
