Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2015 Jul 21;81(16):5299–5308. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00609-15

DNA Microarray-Based Identification of Genes Regulated by NtrC in Bradyrhizobium japonicum

William L Franck a,*, Jing Qiu b, Hae-In Lee c, Woo-Suk Chang c,d,, Gary Stacey a,e
Editor: G Voordouw
PMCID: PMC4510186  PMID: 26025905

Abstract

The Bradyrhizobium japonicum NtrBC two-component system is a critical regulator of cellular nitrogen metabolism, including the acquisition and catabolism of nitrogenous compounds. To better define the roles of this system, genome-wide transcriptional profiling was performed to identify the NtrC regulon during the response to nitrogen limitation. Upon cells perceiving low intracellular nitrogen, they stimulate the phosphorylation of NtrC, which induces genes responsible for alteration of the core glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase nitrogen assimilation pathway, including the genes for the glutamine synthetases and PII proteins. In addition, genes responsible for the import and utilization of multiple nitrogen sources, specifically nitrate and nitrite, were upregulated by NtrC activation. Mutational analysis of a candidate nitrite reductase revealed a role for NtrC in regulating the assimilation of nitrite, since mutations in both ntrC and the gene encoding the candidate nitrite reductase abolished the ability to grow on nitrite as a sole nitrogen source.

INTRODUCTION

The alphaproteobacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum engages in a complex symbiotic interaction with soybean, leading to the development of nitrogen-fixing root nodules. During establishment of the symbiotic interaction, the bacteria infect cells within the developing plant nodule and differentiate into the nitrogen-fixing bacteroid state. Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic bacteroids requires expression of the nitrogenase enzyme complex (1). In many diazotrophic proteobacteria, the nifA gene, whose protein product controls expression of the nif genes, is regulated by the NtrBC two-component regulator (2). However, in B. japonicum, nifA expression is regulated by a redox status mediated by the activity of the RegSR proteins (3). Concurrent with upregulation of the nif genes during bacteroid development is the downregulation of functions related to the assimilation and catabolism of nitrogenous compounds, including glutamine synthetase activity (4). B. japonicum assimilates ammonia via the activity of the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase pathway (5, 6). B. japonicum, in a manner consistent with that of many rhizobia, contains two isoforms of glutamine synthetase, GSI and GSII, encoded by the glnA and glnII genes, respectively. The two isoforms are under the control of different regulatory mechanisms; specifically, glnA is controlled posttranslationally by reversible adenylylation, while glnII is regulated at the level of gene expression.

Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in B. japonicum is controlled, in part, via the ntr regulatory system, which monitors the intracellular ratio of glutamine to α-ketoglutarate (79). Fluctuations in this ratio are reflected in the uridylylation state of the PII regulatory proteins encoded by glnB and glnK. During nitrogen limitation, uridylylated PII stimulates the activation of glutamine synthetase and the phosphorylation of the nitrogen regulatory protein NtrC via its interaction with the histidine kinase NtrB. In contrast to typical histidine kinases, NtrB is not membrane associated and monitors cellular nitrogen status via its interaction with the PII proteins. The B. japonicum NtrC protein is a member of the NtrC class of enhancer binding proteins, which regulate gene expression in response to nitrogen limitation. In B. japonicum, NtrC is required for utilization of nitrate as a sole N source (8), suggesting a critical role for NtrC during free-living growth. On the other hand, a B. japonicum ntrC mutant formed a fully functional symbiosis with soybean, indistinguishable from that formed by the wild type (8). These results are similar to those obtained for a Sinorhizobium meliloti ntrC mutant (10) and indicate that NtrC does not play a critical role in the symbiosis. In addition, the alternative sigma factor RpoN is important for expression of the NtrC-dependent regulatory system (11, 12). Interestingly, there are two functional rpoN genes (rpoN1 and rpoN2) identified in B. japonicum (11). rpoN1 expression is activated under microaerobic conditions (i.e., 2% O2), while rpoN2 is negatively autoregulated (11).

DNA microarray-based transcriptional profiling was used to define the NtrC regulon for a number of organisms, including Escherichia coli (13), S. meliloti (14), and Pseudomonas putida (15). The results of these experiments provided insight into the global regulatory function of NtrC in these organisms and suggested that NtrC is essential for expression of genes related to the transport and catabolism of nitrogenous compounds, as well as regulation of central metabolic networks. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of several additional B. japonicum ntr mutants, as well as a DNA microarray characterization of the NtrC-mediated transcriptional response to nitrogen limitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. B. japonicum strain USDA 110 was routinely maintained at 30°C with shaking (200 rpm) in MYB medium (pH 6.8), consisting of 0.3 g of K2HPO4, 0.3 g of KH2PO4, 0.5 g of NH4NO3, 0.1 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 4 ml of glycerol, 0.5 g of yeast extract, 1.3 g of N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethane sulfonic acid, 1.1 g of 2-(N-morpholino)ethane sulfonic acid, 1 ml of 10 mM FeCl3, and 1 ml of trace element solution (lacking FeSO4) (16) per liter of deionized water. Cultures for microarray experiments were grown in MMB, a defined medium identical to MYB but lacking yeast extract and containing 10 mM sodium glutamate (MMB glutamate, low nitrogen) or 10 mM sodium glutamate plus 10 mM NH4Cl (MMB glutamate plus ammonium, high nitrogen) as the nitrogen source(s), rather than NH4NO3. Antibiotic concentrations of 150 μg ml−1 kanamycin, 100 μg ml−1 tetracycline, and 30 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol were used for B. japonicum when necessary. E. coli cultures were routinely grown on Luria-Bertani medium (17) at 37°C with antibiotic concentrations as follows when necessary: 100 μg ml−1 kanamycin, 100 μg ml−1 spectinomycin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin, 20 μg ml−1 tetracycline, and 30 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this studya

Strain or plasmid Relevant genotype or characteristic(s) Source or reference
B. japonicum strains
    USDA 110 Wild type USDA, Beltsville, MD
    BjΔ4486u nifR mutant, Kanr This study
    BjΔntrBu ntrB mutant This study
    BjΔntrC ntrC mutant, Kanr This study
    BjΔntrBC ntrBC mutant, Kanr This study
    BjΔ4571 bll4571 mutant, Kanr This study
    BjΔntrC-C BjΔntrC containing pRK311-nifR-ntrBC This study
    BjΔ4571-C BjΔ4571 containing pRK311-4571 This study
E. coli strains
    DH5α supE44 ΔlacU169 (Ф80 lacZΔM15) hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1 Bethesda Research Laboratory
    BW25141 F Δ(araD-araB)567 ΔlacZ4787(::rrnB3) Δ(phoB-phoR)580 LAM galU95 ΔuidA3::pir+ recA1 endA9 (deleted and reinserted)::FRT rph-1 Δ(rhaD-rhaB)568 hsdR514 CGSC
Plasmids
    pRK2073 RK2 Tra+ Spr Smr 24
    pHP45Ω-Tc Source of tetracycline cassette 19
    pKnockout-Ω Suicide vector, Spr Smr 18
    pKnockout-G Suicide vector, Gmr 18
    pKOTc Suicide vector, Tetr This study
    pKOTc2 Suicide vector, Tetr This study
    pKD4 Source of FRT-flanked kanamycin resistance template 20
    pKD78 λ Red genes, Cmr CGSC
    pCP20 Source of yeast flippase 22
    pTE3 Tetr 23
    pTE3-FLP FLP expressed from the trp promoter of pTE3, Tetr This study
    pTE3-FLP RBS FLP with an artificial RBS expressed from the trp promoter of pTE3, Tetr This study
    pKOTc2-4486 PCR clone, blr4486 with or without a 500-bp flanking sequence, Tetr Apr This study
    pKOTc2-4486ΔKm Deletion construct for blr4486, Tetr Apr Kanr This study
    pKOTc-ntrBC PCR clone, ntrBC with or without a 500-bp flanking sequence, Tetr Apr This study
    pKOTc-ntrBΔKm Deletion construct for ntrB, Tetr Apr Kanr This study
    pKOTc-ntrCΔKm Deletion construct for ntrC, Tetr Apr Kanr This study
    pKOTc-ntrBCΔKm Deletion construct for ntrBC, Tetr Apr Kanr This study
    pKOTc2-4571 PCR clone, bll4571 with or without a 500-bp flanking sequence, Tetr Apr This study
    pKOTc2-4571ΔKm Deletion construct for bll4571, Tetr Apr Kanr This study
    pRK311 Tetr 25
    pRK311-nifR3ntrBC nifR3ntrBC with a 500-bp 5′ flanking sequence in pRK311, Tetr This study
    pRK311-4571 bll4571 and bll4570 with a 500-bp 5′ flanking sequence, Tetr This study
a

CGSC refers to the E. coli Genetic Stock Center (http://cgsc.biology.yale.edu/index.php). RBS, ribosome binding site.

Plasmids.

Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Plasmid pKOTc was constructed by replacing the Ω cassette of pKnockoutΩ (18) with the tetracycline resistance cassette from pHP45-Tc (19) by recombinational cloning. Plasmid pKnockoutΩ was transformed via electroporation into E. coli strain BW25141 harboring pKD78, and in the resulting strain, the λ Red genes were induced and competent cells were prepared as described previously (20, 21). Briefly, cells were cultured in 25 ml super optimal broth (SOB) medium (17) containing 10 mM l-arabinose to induce the λ Red genes at 30°C, with shaking, until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4 to 0.6 was reached. Cells were pelleted, washed two times with cold 10% glycerol, and frozen at −80°C until use.

A PCR product generated from amplification of the tetracycline resistance cassette from pHP45-Tc with the primers Omega_AgeI_F (5′-GCTGAACCGGTCCTAGGCCACTAACTAA-3′) and Omega_AgeI_R (5′-CAGTAACCGGTTGATTGATTGAGCAAGC-3′) was DpnI treated and purified. The PCR product was then electroporated into BW25141 containing pKD78 and pKnockoutΩ. A tetracycline-resistant and streptomycin-sensitive recombinant was selected and its genotype confirmed by restriction digestion. Plasmid pKOTc2 was constructed by PCR amplification of the tetracycline resistance gene from pHP45-Tc with primers Tet_F_BglII (5′-TGCGCAGATCTTAAGCTTTAATGCGGTAGTT-3′) and Tet_R_BglII (5′-GTACTAGATCTATTCAGGTCGAGGTGGCCCG-3′), followed by digestion of the PCR product with BglII. The resulting fragment was then inserted into the BglII site within the gentamicin resistance gene of pKnockout-G (18).

Construction of pTE3-FLP and pTE3-FLPRBS was performed by PCR amplification of the yeast flippase (FLP) from pCP20 (22) using the primers Flp_R_BamHI (5′-CTGAAGGATCCTTATATGCGTCTATTTATG-3′) and Flp_F_PstI (5′-ACGTACTGCAGATGCCACAATTTGGTATAT-3′) or Flp_F_RBS_PstI (5′-ACGTACTGCAGTAAGGAGGATATTCATATG-3′), where the PstI and BamHI sites are underlined. The resulting PCR products were digested with PstI and BamHI and cloned into the PstI/BamHI sites of pTE3 (23).

Construction of B. japonicum mutants.

B. japonicum mutants were produced by marker exchange following double homologous recombination of a deletion cassette (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). To prepare deletion cassettes, genomic DNA encompassing the deletion target and approximately 500 bp of the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences was PCR amplified using Phusion Hot Start high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Keilaranta, Finland) per the manufacturer's instructions. PCR primers for amplification of B. japonicum genomic DNA and flanking sequence are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Following the addition of 3′ adenine overhangs, the PCR products were cloned into the XcmI site of either pKOTc or pKOTc2. The resulting genomic clones were introduced by electroporation into E. coli BW25141 containing pKD78. Induction of the λ Red genes and preparation of competent cells was performed as described above. A PCR product for disruption of the targeted gene was generated by first amplifying the flippase recognition target (FRT)-flanked kanamycin resistance gene from pKD4 using primers PS1 (5′-GTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC-3′) and PS2 (5′-CATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG-3′), corresponding to priming sites 1 and 2 of pKD4 as described previously (20). The resulting PCR product was purified and DpnI treated. Twenty nanograms of this PCR product was used as the template for a second PCR using the 60-mer oligonucleotide primers listed in Table S1 designed to add 40 bases to the 5′ ends of PS1 and PS2, which are homologous to the regions immediately flanking the deletion target. The PCR was performed using Phusion Hot Start high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Keilaranta, Finland) per the manufacturer's instructions with the following amplification profile: 98°C for 30 s; 2 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 54°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; 28 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 68°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and 72°C for 5 min. The resulting PCR product was purified with the Wizard SV kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

The PCR-amplified kanamycin resistance genes were then electroporated into BW25141 containing pKD78 and the targeted genomic clone. Kanamycin-resistant recombinants were selected at 37°C. Deletion constructs were confirmed by PCR using the forward or reverse primers from the initial PCR cloning in combination with one of two primers located inside the kanamycin resistance gene, PSk1 (5′-CAGTCATAGCCGAATAGCCT-3′) (20) and PSkt′ (5′-GGATTCATCGACTGTGGCCG-3′). Following confirmation, deletion constructs were retransformed into DH5α and moved into wild-type B. japonicum by triparental mating with the helper plasmid pRK2073 (24). Double-recombination mutants were selected by resistance to kanamycin and sensitivity to tetracycline and confirmed by PCR.

The FRT-flanked kanamycin resistance marker was removed from mutant B. japonicum strains by introduction of the FLP gene (22) carried in pTE3-FLP(RBS) by triparental mating with the helper plasmid pRK2073. Tetracycline-resistant transformants in which the kanamycin gene was lost were identified by colony PCR and sensitivity to kanamycin. In the resulting unmarked mutant strains, pTE3-FLP(RBS) was removed via multiple rounds of subculture in the absence of selection, followed by identification of tetracycline-sensitive colonies.

Construction of complemented strains.

To complement the B. japonicum USDA 110 ΔntrC (BjΔntrC) mutant strain, plasmid pRK311-nifR3-ntrBC was created by PCR amplification of the nifR3-ntrBC operon from B. japonicum genomic DNA with primers nifR-F(PstI) (5′-CAACTGCAGGCGTCGTGGATCAGGAC-3′) and ntrC-R(BamHI) (5′-AAAGGATCCAGGCGGCGAGCTAGAACT-3′), where the PstI and BamHI sites are underlined. PCR products were digested with PstI and BamHI and cloned into the PstI and BamHI sites of pRK311 (25). To complement the BjΔ4571 mutant strain (with the entire coding sequence of bll4571 deleted), plasmid pRK311-4571 was constructed by PCR amplification of B. japonicum genomic DNA with the primers bll4571-comp F (NsiI) (5′-TATATGCATCTCTACGCCCAGATGGTG-3) and bll4571-comp R (BglII) (5′-GCAAGATCTTAGTAGACGTCAGCCTG-3′), where the NsiI and BglII sites are underlined. PCR products were digested with NsiI and BglII and cloned into the PstI and BamHI sites of pRK311. The resulting plasmids, pRK311-nifR3ntrBC and pRK311-4571, were introduced into BjΔntrC and BjΔ4571, respectively, to complement them by triparental mating with the helper plasmid pRK2073. The complemented strains were named BjΔntrC-C and BjΔ4571-C, respectively (Table 1).

qRT-PCR analysis.

B. japonicum strains were cultured in 20 ml of MMB glutamate or MMB glutamate plus ammonium to an OD600 of 0.4 to 0.6. Cells were harvested and RNA was extracted as described previously (2628). Synthesis of cDNA and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using 3 μg of total RNA as described previously (2628). Data for three independent biological replicates were generated and normalized to the expression of the bll7457 gene, encoding the histidyl-tRNA synthetase HisS.

DNA microarray analysis.

The whole-genome DNA oligonucleotide microarrays used were described previously (26). One-hundred-milliliter cultures of Bj110 or BjΔntrC were cultured at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm in MMB glutamate or MMB glutamate plus ammonia to an OD600 of 0.4 to 0.6. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 × g at 4°C for 8 min following the addition of a 1/10 volume of 5% phenol (pH 4.3) in ethanol. Supernatants were decanted, and cell pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use. RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, cDNA labeling, and DNA microarray hybridizations were performed as described previously (26, 29). A total of 4 μg of cDNA was used for each sample hybridized. Image acquisition and data processing were performed as described previously (29). The raw intensities were adjusted for background using the normexp background correction method of the limma software (30) and then normalized by the joint lowess normalization method using R/maanova software (1.16.0 version; Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME; http://churchill.jax.org/software/rmaanova.shtml). After normalization of each array, all 48 channels (2 channels per array) were median centered so that the median log-scale expression levels were all zero. The 1,280 empty and control spots were removed from the downstream analysis to reduce the dimension. A linear mixed-effects model was applied to the normalized log2-scale expression measures separately for each gene using R/maanova software (1.16.0 version). Each linear mixed-effects model included array effect, dye effect, spot effect, biological replicate effect, and condition effect, where the array, spot, and biological replicate effects were treated as random effects. Here the spot effect was included to account for duplicated spots on the arrays. Since the condition effect referred to the combination effect of bacterial strains and culture conditions, there were four levels for the condition effect as shown in Fig. 1: wild type at the high nitrogen level (A), wild type at the low nitrogen level (B), BjΔntrC at the high nitrogen level (C), and BjΔntrC at the low nitrogen level (D). t tests were conducted to identify significantly differentially expressed genes for four pairwise comparisons between the four levels of the condition effect, namely, B/A, B/D, A/C, and D/C comparisons. P values from the t statistics were obtained via the matest statement in the R/maanova software, and a q value as a false discovery rate (FDR) (31) was computed for each P value. An FDR of 5% was used to produce lists of differentially expressed genes.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Overview of the DNA microarray experiment. Numbers refer to the total number of genes differentially expressed in each comparison. Bj110, wild type; BjΔntrC, ntrC mutant; Glu, glutamate.

Characterization of the mutant strain BjΔ4571.

The growth of BjΔ4571 on nitrite was examined by producing growth curves in MMB amended with 2 mM nitrite as the sole nitrogen source. Absorbance measurements at 600 nm were recorded for triplicate 20-ml cultures grown at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm.

Nitrite concentrations were analyzed by the Griess reaction as described previously (32). Briefly, cells grown in MMB glutamate were washed once and resuspended in MMB lacking nitrogen to an OD600 of 0.5. Nitrite was added to a final concentration of 900 μM, and the cells were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm. To assay nitrite concentration, 150-μl aliquots were removed from the cultures and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were removed and diluted appropriately. To 50 μl of diluted supernatant, 50 μl of 1% sulfanilamide (in 5% phosphoric acid) was added, and the mixture was incubated in the dark for 10 min. Following the addition of 50 μl of 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine and subsequent incubation for 10 min in the dark, absorbance at 530 nm was recorded and nitrite concentrations were determined from a standard curve generated from samples of known concentration.

GEO accession number.

Microarray data are accessible via the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) by GEO series accession number GSE66091.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Construction and analysis of a series of B. japonicum ntr mutants.

The B. japonicum ntrC gene resides in the nifR3-ntrB-ntrC operon with the gene for the cognate histidine kinase, ntrB, and an open reading frame (ORF) of unknown function, nifR3 (Fig. 2). This genetic arrangement is a common feature among the alphaproteobacteria (4, 33). Two B. japonicum ntrC mutants (Bj3028 and Bj27147) were constructed previously and partially characterized (8). Because these mutants were isolated many years ago, a series of additional mutations were created in nifR (blr4486), ntrB (blr4487), and ntrC (blr4488) in the B. japonicum USDA 110 wild-type background and are represented schematically in Fig. 2. The mutants were created utilizing a marker replacement methodology described by Datsenko and Wanner (20), with plasmid pKD4 as the source of kanamycin resistance. The mutagenesis strategy is outlined in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. Utilization of this mutagenesis strategy confers two primary advantages. First, the regions targeted for deletion can be specifically defined and are not limited to the presence or absence of restriction enzyme target sites. Furthermore, the incorporation of flippase recognition target (FRT) sequences flanking the antibiotic resistance marker facilitates removal of the marker in the mutant strain. This allows the design of nonpolar mutations and recycling of the antibiotic resistance marker, for which there are a limited number of useful markers in B. japonicum. In the present study, the kanamycin resistance gene was removed from each of the single mutants. As a result, both marked and unmarked versions of each strain exist and were used as indicated in the text. Unmarked strains are indicated with a “u” following the strain designation (i.e., BjΔntrB versus BjΔntrBu).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Schematic representation of the nif and ntr mutants. Dashed lines mark the regions deleted from each mutant.

Previous work with strains Bj3028 and Bj27147 indicated that B. japonicum ntrC mutants were compromised in the utilization of nitrate as a sole nitrogen source (8). Mutants carrying deletions of ntrC, BjΔntrC and BjΔntrBC, were unable to utilize nitrate as a sole nitrogen source (Table 2). In contrast, the nifR3 and ntrB mutants, BjΔ4486u and BjΔntrBu, were able to utilize nitrate as a sole nitrogen source. Complementation of BjΔntrC with plasmid pRK311-nifR3-ntrBC (BjΔntrC-C) restored the strain's ability to grow on nitrate (Table 2). Utilization of nitrate as a nitrogen source requires reduction of nitrate to nitrite via the activity of an assimilatory nitrate reductase. Therefore, the ability of the ntr mutants to grow on nitrite as a nitrogen source was also examined (Table 2). BjΔntrC and BjΔntrBC mutants were unable to utilize nitrate or nitrite as a sole nitrogen source. However, the BjΔ4486u and BjΔntrBu mutants were able to utilize nitrite as a sole nitrogen source. These results indicate that NtrC is the key component of the nifR3-ntrB-ntrC operon required for nitrate and nitrite utilization in B. japonicum and that the ntrC mutant phenotype is consistent with that found in other organisms (10, 34).

TABLE 2.

Analysis of nitrogen source utilization by the wild type and B. japonicum mutant strainsa

Strain Result with indicated nitrogen source
Nitrate Nitrite
Bj110 + +
BjΔ4486u (nifR3 mutant) + +
BjΔntrBu + +
BjΔntrC
BjΔntrBC
BjΔntrC-C + +
BjΔ4571 (nirA mutant)
BjΔ4571-C + +
a

Cultures were grown in MMB supplemented with 2 mM nitrate or nitrite as the sole nitrogen source. Plus and minus signs refer to growth and no growth, respectively.

Previous reports indicated that ntrC mutants are defective for induction of glnII expression under aerobic nitrogen-limiting conditions (8). As shown in Fig. 3A, qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the upregulation of glnII under the low-nitrogen condition (10 mM glutamate), compared to its level of expression under the high-nitrogen condition (10 mM glutamate plus 10 mM ammonium), for the wild type but not the BjΔntrC mutant. Furthermore, direct comparison of Bj110 to BjΔntrC under low-nitrogen conditions indicated a much higher expression of glnII in the wild type (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained with the ntrBC double mutant, BjΔntrBC (data not shown). However, the complemented strain BjΔntrC-C restored glnII expression to wild-type levels (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, glnII expression in a nonpolar ntrB mutant, BjΔntrBu, was only 2.5-fold lower than that in the wild type. BjΔntrBu expresses ntrC at wild-type levels (data not shown). These results indicate that ntrC is expressed in the BjΔntrBu mutant and that BjΔntrBu is only partially compromised in the NtrC response to nitrogen limitation, consistent with the phenotypic analysis described above.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

glnII regulation in the wild type and ntr mutants. (A) Differences (fold changes) between the levels of expression of glnII in the wild type under the high-nitrogen condition and in the ntrC mutant under the low-nitrogen condition; (B) differences between the levels of expression of glnII in the wild type and mutant strains under low-nitrogen conditions. Comp, complemented. Numbers above bars indicate average fold changes from three replicates, with standard errors shown by I bars.

Genetic analysis of a series of ntr mutants in Rhodobacter capsulatus indicated that NtrC, but not NtrB, was essential for utilization of N2 and urea as sole nitrogen sources (33). However, an ntrB ntrY double mutant was defective for utilization of N2 and urea (33). NtrY is the histidine kinase of the ntrXY two-component regulatory system that resides immediately downstream of the nifR3-ntrBC operon in both B. japonicum and R. capsulatus. Utilization of nitrate and nitrite by BjΔntrBu suggests that a cross talk among the ntrBC and ntrXY two-component systems similar to that described for R. capsulatus may exist in B. japonicum.

DNA microarray analysis of the B. japonicum NtrC regulon.

To identify genes responding to nitrogen limitation in an NtrC-dependent manner, a series of pairwise DNA microarray comparisons among the wild-type and ntrC mutant strains under both high- and low-nitrogen conditions were performed as depicted in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. Tables S2 to S5 in the supplemental material contain the complete list of differentially expressed genes for each comparison. Analysis of NtrC activity often involves a comparison of cells grown on an organic nitrogen source with cells grown on an inorganic nitrogen source (8, 14, 15). The addition of an inorganic nitrogen source (i.e., ammonium) results in dephosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of NtrC. Comparison of the wild-type B. japonicum strain grown under conditions of high (glutamate and ammonia) nitrogen and low (glutamate only) nitrogen was performed to identify transcripts that respond to nitrogen limitation (i.e., B/A in Materials and Methods and Fig. 1). This comparison included genes that are NtrC-dependently regulated, as well as those that are not NtrC dependent. Therefore, a second comparison of BjΔntrC under high- and low-nitrogen conditions was performed to identify transcripts that respond to nitrogen limitation in an NtrC-independent manner (i.e., D/C in Materials and Methods and Fig. 1). Likewise, direct comparison of Bj110 to BjΔntrC was performed under both high- and low-nitrogen conditions.

Examination of the comparison of wild-type B. japonicum grown under high- and low-nitrogen conditions (i.e., B/A) revealed the differential expression of 168 transcripts at a 2-fold cutoff, with an FDR of 5%. A breakdown of this comparison by functional category is presented in Fig. 4. The transition of Bj110 from high to low nitrogen results in changes in gene expression for several functional categories. Most interesting is the strong upregulation of genes involved in transport and regulatory functions, indicating that the cells alter the composition of proteins related to nitrogen acquisition and ammonia metabolism. Furthermore, genes related to energy metabolism and amino acid biosynthesis are downregulated under the low-nitrogen condition, suggesting that the cells respond to nitrogen limitation by altering the biosynthetic capabilities of the cell.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Functional classifications of differentially expressed genes upregulated under either the low-nitrogen or the high-nitrogen condition. Transcript changes that were greater than 2-fold in the B. japonicum low-nitrogen versus B. japonicum high-nitrogen comparison are noted.

To validate microarray data, we performed qRT-PCR analysis. Thirteen genes were chosen based on fold induction (both up- and downregulation) and functional categories (see Fig. S2 and Table S1 in the supplemental material). In general, there was a strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.90) between the microarray and qRT-PCR data. To extract NtrC-activated genes from the microarray data, we selected 32 genes that were upregulated under both conditions of nitrogen limitation (i.e., B/A) in Bj110 and compared them to those in BjΔntrC (i.e., B/D) (Table 3). In contrast, only one NtrC-repressed gene, bll6809, encoding a hypothetical protein, was identified under both conditions (expression levels indicated −21- and −2.9-fold changes in B/A and B/D, respectively). Of these NtrC-dependent genes, 12 genes were found to have putative RpoN promoter consensus sequences in their upstream regions by motif search analysis (Table 3) (unpublished data). In addition to NtrC-related genes, 48 genes regulated independently of NtrC (upregulated, 27 genes; downregulated, 21 genes) under nitrogen limitation were observed in the D/C comparison (Table 4 and Table S5 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 3.

NtrC-activated genes in a nitrogen status-dependent manner induced in the wild type under low-nitrogen conditionsa

Gene IDb Gene product description Fold change
B/Ac B/Dd
blr1448 Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, periplasmic amino acid-binding protein 48.7 38.5
blr0612 Nitrogen regulatory protein PII 24.8 18.1
blr4169 Glutamine synthetase II 13.1 10.0
blr6148 Bmp family protein 10.5 6.7
bll6154 Unknown protein 7.4 3.0
blr2803 ABC transporter nitrate-binding protein 6.4 5.2
blr0613 Ammonium transporter 6.1 7.5
bll5738 Unknown protein 6.1 3.8
bll4571 Ferredoxin-nitrite reductase, putative 6.0 5.1
bll3763 Unknown protein 5.6 4.7
bll6424 Drug resistance transporter, Bcr/CflA family, putative 5.2 2.3
bll7538 Hypothetical protein 5.1 2.2
bll3286 Bacterial extracellular solute-binding domain protein, putative 4.6 2.3
blr6158 Bmp family protein 3.8 2.6
bll3347 Cytosine/purine/uracil/thiamine/allantoin permease family protein, putative 3.6 3.7
blr0606 Nitrogen regulatory protein PII 3.5 9.9
blr3337 Heme-binding lipoprotein, putative 3.3 2.6
blr4948 Nitrogen regulatory protein PII 3.0 5.2
blr7922 ABC transporter substrate-binding protein 3.0 2.9
blr3004 Squalene-hopene cyclase 2.9 2.5
blr1036 Oligopeptide ABC transporter, periplasmic oligopeptide-binding protein, putative 2.9 2.7
blr7887 CvpA family protein 2.8 2.0
blr3321 Putative aspartate aminotransferase-related protein 2.7 2.1
bll5737 Putative acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase 2.3 2.0
bll3318 Taurine ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 2.3 2.0
blr1455 Urease, beta subunit 2.2 2.4
bll0897 Soluble pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase 2.2 2.1
blr2243 Unknown protein 2.2 2.4
blr5575 Putrescine ABC transporter, permease protein, putative 2.1 2.2
blr2099 Adenosylmethionine-8-amino-7-oxononanoate aminotransferase 2.1 2.0
bll1798 Hypothetical protein 2.1 3.4
bll2045 Unknown protein 2.1 4.8
a

Genes were upregulated under both conditions (i.e., B/A and B/D) of nitrogen limitation, and the wild type was compared to the BjΔntrC mutant.

b

An underlined gene identifier (ID) indicates that its promoter region contains the putative RpoN sigma factor binding site.

c

B/A refers to a comparison of the B. japonicum wild type grown under low-nitrogen conditions and the B. japonicum wild type grown under high-nitrogen conditions.

d

B/D refers to a comparison of the B. japonicum wild type grown under low-nitrogen conditions and the BjΔntrC mutant grown under low-nitrogen conditions.

TABLE 4.

Genes induced under nitrogen limitation independently of NtrCa

Gene ID Gene product description Fold change (D/C)b
blr1889 Sugar ABC transporter, periplasmic sugar-binding protein, putative 6.89
bll5155 Hypothetical protein 4.30
blr5803 Sulfonate ABC transporter, permease protein SsuC 4.01
blr1893 3-Oxoacyl (acyl carrier protein) reductase (EC 1.1.1.100) 3.94
blr1891 Sugar ABC transporter, permease protein 3.79
blr1890 Sugar ABC transporter, permease protein 2.91
bsr2847 Unknown protein 2.58
bll3639 Acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase, biotin carboxyl carrier protein 2.56
blr1895 Maltose/maltodextrin ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 2.49
bll7395 Hypothetical protein 2.43
blr4988 Unknown protein 2.35
blr5556 Hypothetical protein 2.31
bll2292 Probable plastocyanin 2.28
blr2344 Purine-binding chemotaxis protein, putative 2.22
bsr5172 Unknown protein 2.17
blr8273 Transcriptional regulator, LysR family, putative 2.16
bll8202 Unknown protein 2.12
blr4995 Hypothetical protein 2.12
bll3386 Transcriptional regulatory protein 2.11
bll6754 Hypothetical protein 2.11
bll1568 Unknown protein 2.10
bsr5798 Unknown protein 2.09
blr3288 Amidase family protein 2.07
blr7050 Unknown protein 2.06
blr8090 Unknown protein 2.06
blr6347.1n Hypothetical protein 2.03
blr4224 Unknown protein 2.00
a

Genes that are upregulated in the BjΔntrC mutant strain under low-nitrogen conditions (i.e., the D/C comparison).

b

D/C refers to a comparison of the BjΔntrC mutant grown under low nitrogen and the BjΔntrC mutant grown under high nitrogen.

Regulation of glutamine synthetase and the PII proteins.

Assimilation of nitrogen in rhizobia occurs primarily via the activity of the GS/GOGAT (glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase) pathway (4). Unlike enteric bacteria that contain only a single glutamine synthetase, rhizobia typically contain two or three glutamine synthetase enzymes (4). The B. japonicum genome encodes three glutamine synthetase enzymes, two copies of glnA (blr4949 and blr4835), and the glnII (blr4169) gene. Among them, only glnII was induced in an NtrC-dependent manner under low-nitrogen conditions (Table 3). Neither copy of glnA was differentially regulated by the change in nitrogen status or the introduction of the ntrC mutation (see Tables S2 to S5 in the supplemental material). This result suggests that glnII might be the gene primarily controlled by NtrC at the transcriptional level to activate the GS/GOGAT system when B. japonicum encounters nitrogen starvation. The lack of transcriptional regulation of the two glnA genes is not surprising since GlnA is known to be regulated posttranslationally in B. japonicum by reversible adenylylation (35, 36). It was also proposed that the rhizobial glnII isoform is likely important for assimilation of ammonium generated intracellularly during nitrogen starvation (4). Consistently with this model and previous results (8), our findings suggest different levels of regulation of expression of three glutamine synthetase enzymes in B. japonicum. In addition to investigating the GS/GOGAT pathway, it might be interesting to investigate gdhA, encoding glutamate dehydrogenase, repressed by NtrC in P. putida (13), which is not present in the annotated B. japonicum genome. The locus blr7995, initially annotated as a hypothetical protein, likely encodes a putative NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase since it contains a highly conserved bacterial NAD-glutamate dehydrogenase domain (pfam05088). However, the expression of blr7955, unlike that of glutamine synthetase, was not NtrC dependent.

The expression of GlnII in Rhizobium leguminosarum was demonstrated to be dependent upon the glutamine synthetase translation inhibitor protein GstI (37). GstI is a small 63-amino-acid protein in R. leguminosarum that serves to regulate the translation of glnII mRNAs in response to nitrogen status, and the expression of gstI mRNA is repressed by phosphorylated NtrC (37). A B. japonicum homolog of gstI, bsl4167, is downregulated 3.8-fold under nitrogen limitation (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). The gstI gene of B. japonicum lies upstream of glnII (blr4169) and is transcribed in the opposite orientation in a manner similar to that of R. leguminosarum. However, the presence of an additional predicted ORF (bll4168) of unknown function between gstI and glnII, which is not present in R. leguminosarum, suggests that transcriptional control of B. japonicum gstI may differ from that in R. leguminosarum. Interestingly, gstI is also 3.8-fold upregulated in the wild type compared to in BjΔntrC under high-nitrogen conditions (see Table S4 in the supplemental material); no difference was observed under low-nitrogen conditions (Table S3), suggesting that NtrC may be necessary for maximal gstI expression.

In contrast to glnII, which was upregulated, blr6742, a putative glutamate synthase homologous to gltD, was downregulated under the low-nitrogen condition (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). A similar regulation was observed in S. meliloti under nitrogen limitation (14). The regulation of blr6742 appears to be independent of NtrC, as differential regulation was not observed when the wild type was compared to the ntrC mutant under low-nitrogen conditions (Table S3). The NtrC-independent regulation of gltD was also observed in S. meliloti (14). Based upon the differential regulation of glnII and a gltD homolog in B. japonicum, it appears that, as in E. coli (33), the GS/GOGAT pathway is manipulated during nitrogen limitation to maintain nitrogen assimilation for biosynthetic purposes by directing the GS/GOGAT pathway toward glutamine production.

The PII proteins of B. japonicum presumably control the phosphorylation of NtrC and the adenylylation of GlnA, but not GlnII (38). Uridylylation of the PII proteins by GlnD under nitrogen limitation disrupts the interaction of PII with NtrB, thereby allowing the phosphorylation and activation of NtrC. B. japonicum contains three PII proteins, two copies of glnK, glnK1 (blr0606) and glnK2 (blr0612), and a single copy of glnB (blr4948), which are all induced under low-nitrogen conditions in an NtrC-dependent manner (Table 3). Interestingly, one of the PII proteins, GlnK2, is more strongly induced than the other two PII proteins (Table 3). The glnK2 gene, adjacent to and likely cotranscribed with the putative ammonium transporter amtB, was also demonstrated to be regulated by NifA and RpoN (39), as well as induced in bacteroids (40). Examination of the PII proteins of Rhodopseudomonas palustris indicated that glnK2 is expressed predominantly under nitrogen-limiting conditions (41), in agreement with the data presented here, and likely serves to regulate the expression of the ammonium transporter AmtB (blr0613), which is also NtrC dependent and upregulated under low-nitrogen conditions (Table 3).

Regulation of transport functions.

In addition to genes involved in ammonium assimilation and the perception of the intracellular nitrogen status being regulated, a number of transport-related genes are NtrC regulated. Among 32 NtrC-activated genes, 12 were categorized as having transport and substrate binding functions (Table 3 and see Tables S2 to S3 in the supplemental material). Included in this list are blr1448, blr6148, blr2803, blr0613, bll6424, bll3286, blr6158, blr3337, blr7922, blr1036, bll3318, and blr5575.

As indicated in Table 3, expression of blr1448 responds most strongly to NtrC activation. This gene encodes an ABC transporter substrate-binding protein with homology to urtA, a component of the high-affinity urea transporter characterized in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 (42). Under physiological conditions, urea diffuses freely across membranes, and therefore, energy-dependent transport systems for urea uptake typically operate only under nitrogen limitation and have high affinities for urea, facilitating the utilization of urea present in low concentrations in the environment (42).

Once urea is transported into the cytosol, the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide should be catalyzed by an enzyme called urease. Expression of blr1455 (ureB), encoding the urease beta subunit, was NtrC dependent under low nitrogen (Table 3), which suggests that following urea uptake, B. japonicum utilizes the urease system to support the use of this nitrogen resource. However, we did not detect the regulation of other genes, such as ureA, encoding the alpha subunit, and ureI, encoding the urea channel, in the urease system. The full complement of urease genes in C. glutamicum (43) and Pseudomonas putida (15) were upregulated in response to nitrogen limitation. A possible explanation for the lack of induction of the full urease system in B. japonicum under nitrogen limitation is the induction of two genes (blr1601 and blr1602) encoding substrate binding and permease proteins of an ABC transporter under low nitrogen (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). These two genes have homology to the nikA and nikB genes of E. coli and Brucella suis. The nikA and nikB genes are components of a nickel transport system, and NikA was demonstrated to be required for full activity of the nickel-dependent urease of B. suis (44). Furthermore, blr1601 is also 8-fold upregulated under hydrogen-oxidizing conditions during the chemoautotrophic growth of B. japonicum (29) when nickel is required for derepression of the nickel-dependent hydrogenase (45). The medium used for the B. japonicum DNA microarray experiments described here was not supplemented with nickel. Therefore, the lack of expression of the urease system in the absence of nickel may reflect the nickel-dependent derepression of the hydrogenase system. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests a role for blr1601 and blr1602 in determining the host range of B. japonicum (46). Both genes were identified as upregulated in bacteroids obtained from siratro compared to bacteroids from either soybean or cowpea (46). Mutation of the region encompassing blr1601 and blr1602 resulted in a reduction in symbiotic nitrogen fixation in siratro, but not in other hosts (46). Presently, the substrates transported by this set of genes remain unclear. However, the apparent induction of genes potentially related to urea and nickel transport suggests that the utilization of urea (or nitrogen compounds metabolized via urea) may be an important adaptation to nitrogen limitation in B. japonicum.

Nitrate and nitrite assimilation.

The inability of the BjΔntrC mutant to utilize nitrate or nitrite as a sole nitrogen source suggests that NtrC controls the expression of genes essential for the assimilation of these compounds. The respiratory denitrification pathway of B. japonicum, including those of dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite reductases, supports anaerobic growth using nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor and is well characterized (47). None of the reported components of the B. japonicum denitrification pathway were induced under the low-nitrogen condition. The components of this system are part of the oxygen-responsive regulon (47) in B. japonicum and, hence, may not be part of the NtrC-controlled regulon. However, blr2803 (nrtA), encoding an ABC transporter nitrate-binding protein, was upregulated in an NtrC-dependent manner (Table 3), suggesting that nrtA may be a key gene under NtrC control for nitrate assimilation.

An additional gene, bll4571 (nirA), encoding a putative ferredoxin-nitrite reductase, was also upregulated more than 5-fold under the low-nitrogen conditions in an NtrC-dependent manner (Table 3). However, we did not observe the induction of any nitrate reductase by NtrC. The discrepancy between the NtrC-dependent expression of nitrite reductase and nitrate reductase might be explained by the fact that glutamate added under the low-nitrogen condition might be converted to alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonium by glutamate dehydrogenase (e.g., Blr7995) with NAD as a cofactor. As a by-product, the ammonium can be converted to nitrite by NirA, whose catalytic function is reversible in the reaction, although the majority of ammonia may be used for macromolecular, biosynthetic processes. On the other hand, assimilatory nitrate reduction may be suppressed because both ammonia and nitrite are already available.

To investigate the function of NirA, a B. japonicum nirA mutant, strain BjΔ4571, was generated by deletion of the entire coding sequence of bll4571. The BjΔ4571 mutant was unable to utilize nitrate or nitrite as a sole nitrogen source (Table 2). The symbiotic phenotype of BjΔ4571 was indistinguishable from that of the wild-type parent (data not shown). Complementation of BjΔ4571 with plasmid pRK311-4571 restored the ability of the mutant strain to utilize nitrate and nitrite, with growth curves comparable to those of the wild type (Fig. 5A). To analyze nitrite consumption, the wild-type, BjΔntrC, BjΔ4571, and BjΔ4571-C strains were grown on glutamate under low-nitrogen conditions and cells were harvested and resuspended in MMB containing 900 μM nitrite. Nitrite concentrations were analyzed from culture supernatants for a period of 24 h. As shown in Fig. 5B, the wild-type and complemented BjΔ4571-C strains consumed all the nitrite present in the medium within the 24-h period. In contrast, no nitrite was consumed by the ntrC and nirA mutants (Fig. 5B). The inability of BjΔ4571 to utilize nitrite and the homology to characterized NirA proteins suggest that the B. japonicum nirA homolog, bll4571, encodes an assimilatory nitrite reductase.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

(A) Growth curves of B. japonicum strains cultured on 2 mM nitrite as the sole nitrogen source; (B) nitrite consumption in B. japonicum cultures incubated in the presence of 900 μM nitrite. Symbols and strains used are as follows: ■, B. japonicum wild type; □, BjΔntrC; ○, BjΔ4571; ●, BjΔ4571-C. Error bars represent standard deviations from three biological replicates.

Conclusions.

The results presented here provide a framework for understanding the transcriptional changes that occur in B. japonicum in response to nitrogen limitation. The NtrBC two-component regulatory system controls the expression of a portion of genes responding to nitrogen limitation. Interestingly, ntrB seems to be dispensable for the function of NtrC. Nitrogen limitation induces the expression of genes required for nitrogen assimilation, including components of the GS/GOGAT pathway, as well as PII proteins acting to regulate the pathway. Expression of a large number of transport-related proteins was also induced. However, the substrates for these transporters are unknown, and it is difficult to predict their cellular functions based strictly on the gene annotations. Finally, genes involved in nitrate and nitrite acquisition and reduction were also upregulated in an NtrC-dependent fashion. Among these genes, the microarray analysis led to the identification and characterization of the B. japonicum nirA gene, encoding assimilatory nitrite reductase.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by grants from the USDA-CSREES National Research Initiative (grant 2004-35064-14708) and the National Science Foundation (grant DBI-0421620).

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00609-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fischer HM. 1994. Genetic regulation of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia. Microbiol Rev 58:352–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dixon R, Kahn D. 2004. Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:621–631. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lindemann A, Moser A, Pessi G, Hauser F, Friberg M, Hennecke H, Fischer HM. 2007. New target genes controlled by the Bradyrhizobium japonicum two-component regulatory system RegSR. J Bacteriol 189:8928–8943. doi: 10.1128/JB.01088-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patriarca EJ, Tate R, Iaccarino M. 2002. Key role of bacterial NH(4)(+) metabolism in Rhizobium-plant symbiosis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:203–222. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.2.203-222.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vairinhos F, Bhandari B, Nicholas DJ. 1983. Glutamine synthetase, glutamate synthase, and glutamate dehydrogenase in Rhizobium japonicum strains grown in cultures and in bacteroids from root nodules of Glycine max. Planta 159:207–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00397526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown CM, Dilworth MJ. 1975. Ammonia assimilation by Rhizobium cultures and bacteroids. J Gen Microbiol 86:39–48. doi: 10.1099/00221287-86-1-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reitzer L. 2003. Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:155–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martin GB, Chapman KA, Chelm BK. 1988. Role of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum ntrC gene product in differential regulation of the glutamine synthetase II gene (glnII). J Bacteriol 170:5452–5459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merrick MJ, Edwards RA. 1995. Nitrogen control in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 59:604–622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Szeto WW, Nixon BT, Ronson CW, Ausubel FM. 1987. Identification and characterization of the Rhizobium meliloti ntrC gene: R. meliloti has separate regulatory pathways for activation of nitrogen fixation genes in free-living and symbiotic cells. J Bacteriol 169:1423–1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kullik I, Fritsche S, Knobel H, Sanjuan J, Hennecke H, Fischer HM. 1991. Bradyrhizobium japonicum has two differentially regulated, functional homologs of the sigma 54 gene (rpoN). J Bacteriol 173:1125–1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.North AK, Klose KE, Stedman KM, Kustu S. 1993. Prokaryotic enhancer-binding proteins reflect eukaryote-like modularity: the puzzle of nitrogen regulatory protein C. J Bacteriol 175:4267–4273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zimmer DP, Soupene E, Lee HL, Wendisch VF, Khodursky AB, Peter BJ, Bender RA, Kustu S. 2000. Nitrogen regulatory protein C-controlled genes of Escherichia coli: scavenging as a defense against nitrogen limitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:14674–14679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davalos M, Fourment J, Lucas A, Berges H, Kahn D. 2004. Nitrogen regulation in Sinorhizobium meliloti probed with whole genome arrays. FEMS Microbiol Lett 241:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hervas AB, Canosa I, Santero E. 2008. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas putida in response to nitrogen availability. J Bacteriol 190:416–420. doi: 10.1128/JB.01230-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cole MA, Elkan GH. 1973. Transmissible resistance to penicillin G, neomycin, and chloramphenicol in Rhizobium japonicum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 4:248–253. doi: 10.1128/AAC.4.3.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Windgassen M, Urban A, Jaeger KE. 2000. Rapid gene inactivation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193:201–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fellay R, Frey J, Krisch H. 1987. Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria: a family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of gram-negative bacteria. Gene 52:147–154. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF. 2003. PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1541–1546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337542100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W. 1995. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene 158:9–14. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00193-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Egelhoff TT, Long SR. 1985. Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes: identification of nodDABC gene products, purification of nodA protein, and expression of nodA in Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol 164:591–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leong SA, Ditta GS, Helinski DR. 1982. Heme biosynthesis in Rhizobium. Identification of a cloned gene coding for delta-aminolevulinic acid synthetase from Rhizobium meliloti. J Biol Chem 257:8724–8730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ditta G, Schmidhauser T, Yakobson E, Lu P, Liang XW, Finlay DR, Guiney D, Helinski DR. 1985. Plasmids related to the broad host range vector, pRK290, useful for gene cloning and for monitoring gene expression. Plasmid 13:149–153. doi: 10.1016/0147-619X(85)90068-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang WS, Franck WL, Cytryn E, Jeong S, Joshi T, Emerich DW, Sadowsky MJ, Xu D, Stacey G. 2007. An oligonucleotide microarray resource for transcriptional profiling of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:1298–1307. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-10-1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jeon JM, Lee HI, Donati AJ, So JS, Emerich DW, Chang WS. 2011. Whole-genome expression profiling of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in response to hydrogen peroxide. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1472–1481. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-11-0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Donati AJ, Jeon JM, Sangurdekar D, So JS, Chang WS. 2011. Genome-wide transcriptional and physiological responses of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to paraquat-mediated oxidative stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3633–3643. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00047-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Franck WL, Chang WS, Qiu J, Sugawara M, Sadowsky MJ, Smith SA, Stacey G. 2008. Whole-genome transcriptional profiling of Bradyrhizobium japonicum during chemoautotrophic growth. J Bacteriol 190:6697–6705. doi: 10.1128/JB.00543-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, Holmes M, Diyagama D, Holloway A, Smyth GK. 2007. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics 23:2700–2707. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9440–9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nicholas DJD, Nason A. 1957. Determination of nitrate and nitrite. Methods Enzymol 3:981–984. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Drepper T, Wiethaus J, Giaourakis D, Gross S, Schubert B, Vogt M, Wiencek Y, McEwan AG, Masepohl B. 2006. Cross-talk towards the response regulator NtrC controlling nitrogen metabolism in Rhodobacter capsulatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 258:250–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rossbach S, Schell J, de Bruijn FJ. 1987. The ntrC gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 controls glutamine synthetase (GSII) activity, growth on nitrate and chromosomal but not Ti-encoded arginine catabolism pathways. Mol Gen Genet 209:419–426. doi: 10.1007/BF00331144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Darrow RA, Knotts RR. 1977. Two forms of glutamine synthetase in free-living root-nodule bacteria. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 78:554–559. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(77)90214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carlson TA, Guerinot ML, Chelm BK. 1985. Characterization of the gene encoding glutamine synthetase I (glnA) from Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J Bacteriol 162:698–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spinosa M, Riccio A, Mandrich L, Manco G, Lamberti A, Iaccarino M, Merrick M, Patriarca EJ. 2000. Inhibition of glutamine synthetase II expression by the product of the gstI gene. Mol Microbiol 37:443–452. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fuchs RL, Keister DL. 1980. Comparative properties of glutamine synthetases I and II in Rhizobium and Agrobacterium spp. J Bacteriol 144:641–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hauser F, Pessi G, Friberg M, Weber C, Rusca N, Lindemann A, Fischer HM, Hennecke H. 2007. Dissection of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA+sigma54 regulon, and identification of a ferredoxin gene (fdxN) for symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Mol Genet Genomics 278:255–271. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0246-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pessi G, Ahrens CH, Rehrauer H, Lindemann A, Hauser F, Fischer HM, Hennecke H. 2007. Genome-wide transcript analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids in soybean root nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:1353–1363. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Connelly HM, Pelletier DA, Lu TY, Lankford PK, Hettich RL. 2006. Characterization of pII family (GlnK1, GlnK2, and GlnB) protein uridylylation in response to nitrogen availability for Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Anal Biochem 357:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Valladares A, Montesinos ML, Herrero A, Flores E. 2002. An ABC-type, high-affinity urea permease identified in cyanobacteria. Mol Microbiol 43:703–715. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Silberbach M, Burkovski A. 2006. Application of global analysis techniques to Corynebacterium glutamicum: new insights into nitrogen regulation. J Biotechnol 126:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jubier-Maurin V, Rodrigue A, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Layssac M, Mandrand-Berthelot MA, Kohler S, Liautard JP. 2001. Identification of the nik gene cluster of Brucella suis: regulation and contribution to urease activity. J Bacteriol 183:426–434. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.2.426-434.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim H, Maier RJ. 1990. Transcriptional regulation of hydrogenase synthesis by nickel in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J Biol Chem 265:18729–18732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Koch M, Delmotte N, Rehrauer H, Vorholt JA, Pessi G, Hennecke H. 2010. Rhizobial adaptation to hosts, a new facet in the legume root-nodule symbiosis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:784–790. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-6-0784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bedmar EJ, Robles EF, Delgado MJ. 2005. The complete denitrification pathway of the symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Biochem Soc Trans 33:141–144. doi: 10.1042/BST0330141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES