Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2015 Jul 6;4:384–389. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.06.009

Data supporting the design and evaluation of a universal primer pair for pseudogene-free amplification of HPRT1 in real-time PCR

Reza Valadan a,b,1, Akbar Hedayatizadeh-Omran a,1, Mahdyieh Naghavi Alhosseini-Abyazani a, Omolbanin Amjadi a, Alireza Rafiei a,b,, Mohsen Tehrani a,b, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei a
PMCID: PMC4510554  PMID: 26217821

Abstract

Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) is a common housekeeping gene for sample normalization in the quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain (qRT-PCR). However, co-amplification of HPRT1 pseudogenes may affect accurate results obtained in qRT-PCR. We designed a primer pair (HPSF) for pseudogene-free amplification of HPRT1 in qRT-PCR [1]. We showed specific amplification of HPRT1 mRNA in some common laboratory cell lines, including HeLa, NIH/3T3, CHO, BHK, COS-7 and VERO. This article provides data supporting the presence and location of HPRT1 pseudogenes within human and mouse genome, and the strategies used for designing primers that avoid the co-amplification of contaminating pseudogenes in qRT-PCR. In silico analysis of human genome showed three homologous sequences for HPRT1 on chromosomes 4, 5 and 11. The mRNA sequence of HPRT1 was aligned with the pseudogenes, and the primers were designed toward 5′ end of HPRT1 mRNA that was only specific to HPRT1 mRNA not to the pseudogenes. The standard curve plot generated by HPSF primers showed the correlation coefficient of 0.999 and the reaction efficiency of 99.5%. Our findings suggest that HPSF primers can be recommended as a candidate primer pair for accurate and reproducible qRT-PCR assays.


Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Molecular biology, Quantitative real time PCR
Type of data Table, figure
How data was acquired In silico analysis of HPRT1 pseudogenes using online bioinformatics tools and CLC Main Workbench software (Qiagen, USA) and Allele ID primer design software version 7.5 (Premier Biosoft, USA).Primer efficiency data acquired by analysis of amplification curve using quantitative real time PCR (iQ5, Biorad,USA)
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors HPRT1 pseudogenes, HPRT1 expression, standard curve, HPRT1 expression in HeLa, NIH/3T3, CHO, BHK, VERO and COS-7
Experimental features Bioinformatics analysis of human and mouse genome were performed to find HPRT1 pseudogenes. HPRT1-specific primers were designed and tested for pseudogene-free amplification of HPRT1 in different cell lines. The primers specificity and efficiency were also determined in qRT-PCR.
Data source location Sari, Iran
Data accessibility Data is provided with this and the main article [1].

Value of the data

  • HPRT1 is a sensitive internal control for normalization of gene expression in qRT-PCR.

  • HPSF primer pair allows pseudogene-free amplification of HPRT1 mRNA in qRT-PCR.

  • HPSF primer pair provides specific and high efficient amplification of HPRT1 in qRT-PCR.

  • HPSF primer pair amplifies HPRT1 mRNA across a wide range of mammalian species.

1. Data, experimental design, materials and methods

1.1. Primer design

Prior to the identification of human genome sequences, it was shown that HPRT1 contained four pseudogenes on chromosome 3, 5, and 11 [2,3]. Here to identify putative pseudogenes of HPRT1, human and mouse HPRT1 mRNA sequences were used as baits in the Blat and Blast online tools at UCSC Genome Bioinformatics (https://genome.ucsc.edu/) and National Centre for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) respectively. Sequences scored more than 400 and 283 for human and mouse HPRT1 mRNA were selected for further analysis. In consistent with a previous study [4], we also identified three pseudogenes for human HPRT1 on chromosomes 4, 5, and 11 and one for mouse HPRT1 on chromosome 17 (Table 1). To design pseudogene-free primers, HPRT1 mRNA and pseudogene sequences were aligned using CLC Main Workbench software version 5.5 (Qiagen, USA) (see Fig. 1 in Ref. [1]). In order to avoid co-amplification of genomic DAN (gDNA) contamination, unique regions of HPRT1 mRNA that corresponded to exon−exon junctions were selected. In addition, HPRT1 mRNA sequences of human, mouse, rat, Chinese hamster, golden hamster, and rhesus monkey were aligned to design a universal primer pair capable of amplifying HPRT1 mRNA in these species (Fig. 1). Primers were designed using Allele ID primer design software version 7.5 (Premier Biosoft, USA) (Table 2). In silico analysis also demonstrated that HPSF primer pair potentially covers a wide taxonomic range in mammals spanning from whale to human (Table 3).

Table 1.

Detail information of HPSF primers.

Primer name Primer sequences (5′−3′) Length (bp) Tm(°C) GC content (%) Nucleotide position (NM_000194.2)
HPSF -F GGACTAATTATGGACAGGACTG 22 61.8 45.5 285–306
HPSF -R GCTCTTCAGTCTGATAAAATCTAC 24 61 37.50 456–479

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Alignment of HPRT1 mRNAs from different species to identify appropriate regions for primer design. High level of sequence similarity between HPRT1 mRNA sequences in different species makes it possible to design a universal cross-species primer. Black boxes show forward and reverse primer binding regions.

Table 2.

HPRT1 pseudogenes in human and mouse.

HPRT1pseudogenes (NCBI gene ID) Chromosomal location Identity to HPRT1 mRNA (% and positions)
HPRT1P1(ID: 100130067) Chromosome 4, NC_000004.12 (15864937. 15865569 complement) 75%
(237–559) (549–1352)
HPRT1P2(ID: 3254) Chromosome 5, NC_000005.10 (30248374. 30249481) 77%
(55–669) (836–1413)
HPRT1P3(ID: 3255) Chromosome 11, NC_000011.10 (93990676. 93991522, complement); Chromosome 11, NC_000011.10 (93998649. 93999220, complement) 83%
(162–725) (748–1377)
Hprt-ps1(ID: 111269) Mouse Chromosome 17, NC_000083.6 (65396008. 65395223 complement) 75%
(526–1272)

Table 3.

HPRT1 mRNA sequences can be amplified by HPSF primer in various species.

Speciesa Accession number Speciesb Accession number Speciesc Accession number
Homo sapiens NM_000194.2 Neovison vison JN587807.1 Microtus rossiaemeridionalis GU645978.1
Tupaia chinensis XM_006171444.1 Mirounga angustirostris JN820130.1 Microtus arvalis GU645977.1
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus XM_005337680.1 Loxodonta Africana XM_003420864.1 Myodes glareolus JN701897.1
Echinops telfairi XM_004715363.1 Bos Taurus NM_001034035.2 Microtus oeconomus JN701898.1
Jaculus jaculus XM_004653986.1 Mustela putoriusfuro XM_004815015.1 XM_004778420.1 Cricetulus longicaudatus X59652.1
X17656.1
Tursiops truncatus XM_004323200.1 Bos mutus XM_005911180.1 Ochotona princeps XM_004582998.1
Orcinus orca XM_004285480.1 Leptonychotes weddellii XM_006744882.1 Microtus ochrogaster XM_005358462.1
XM_006730753.1
Nomascus leucogenys XM_003272534.2 XM_003272533.2 Bubalus bubalis XM_006074802.1 Cricetulus griseus XM_003503017.1
Gorilla gorilla gorilla XM_004064891.1 Panthera tigrisaltaica XM_007093584.1 Mus spretus M20011.1
Saimiri boliviensisboliviensis XM_003931150.1 Felis catus XM_006944016.1 Mesocricetu sauratus XM_005085546.1
Papio Anubis XM_003918303.1 Bubalus bubalis XM_006074802.1 Mus musculus NM_013556.2
Pan paniscus XM_003814508.1 Panthera tigrisaltaica XM_007093584.1 Rattus norvegicus NM_012583.2
Otolemur garnettii XM_003796967.1 Trichechus manatus latirostris XM_004379641.1
Pongo abelii XM_002832128.2 Ovis aries XM_004022693.1
Callithrix jacchus XM_002763292.2 Myotis davidii XM_006759719.1
Macaca mulatta XM_001097691.2 Vicugna pacos XM_006215984.1 XM_006201457.1
Elephantulus edwardii XM_006881880.1 Camelus ferus XM_006194437.1
Sus scrofa NM_001032376.2 Myotis lucifugus XM_006082071.1
Macaca fascicularis NM_001283594.1 Pantholops hodgsonii XM_005982399.1 XM_005956708.1
Pan troglodytes NM_001110817.1 Myotis brandtii XM_005872845.1
Tursiops truncatus DQ404543.1 Capra hircus XM_005700316.1 XM_005698763.1
Stenella coeruleoalba DQ533610.1 Lipotes vexillifer XM_007462883.1
Akodon cursor AF254384.1 Balaenoptera acutorostrata scammoni XM_007174545.1
Physeter catodon XM_007117444.1 XM_007101314.1
a

The HPSF primer set is fully matched with these species.

b

HPSF forward primer contains a mismatch at position of 21 for these species.

c

HPSF forward primer contains a mismatch at position of 6 for these species.

1.2. Cell lines and cell culture

HeLa, NIH/3T3, CHO, BHK, VERO and COS-7 cell lines were obtained from Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (PAA, Pasching/Austria) containing inactivated fetal bovine serum (PAA, Pasching/ Austria), l-glutamine (300 mg/l), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). The cell lines were maintained in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in an incubator (Memmert, Germany) with 95% humidity.

1.3. Nucleic acid extraction

The cell lines were cultured to Subconfluent stage in 25 cm2 culture flasks (SPL, South Korea) and then genomic DNA and total RNA was extracted using AccuPrep®Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Korea) and Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), respectively. The quantity and integrity of the isolated nucleic acids were verified by Nano-spectrophotometer (WPA, UK) and electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel, respectively.

1.4. First strand cDNA synthesis and polymerase chain reaction

Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 microgram of the total RNA in a 20 µl reaction using the Omniscript-RT-Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instruction. PCR reaction was carried out in a total volume of 20 µl containing of 10 mM Tris HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 200 nmol each forward and reverse primers, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 250 µM dNTP, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Germeny), 2 µl cDNA and 100 ng DNA as templates. The thermal profile included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The reactions were cycled in an Eppendorf MasterCycler gradient thermal cycler (Germany). The PCR products were visualized after separation on a 2% agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide. The results of PCR in the all tested cell lines showed that HPSF primers amplified the expected 195 bp products only when cDNA used as templates (see Fig. 1 in Ref. [1]).

1.5. DNA sequencing

The accuracy of the amplification reaction was validated by DNA sequencing of the PCR products. The human and mouse amplicons were excised from a 2% agarose gel, and purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity of the purified plasmid was then measured by spectrophotometer (Biochrom WPA, UK). About 10 ng of each amplicon was ligated into pTG19-T cloning vector (Vivantis, Malaysia) and transformed into chemically competent bacterial cells. Sequencing of the inserts was performed using capillary DNA analyzer (ABI 3730, Applied Biosystems, USA) after sequencing reactions with a Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The nucleotide sequences of human and mouse HPRT1 mRNA were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers KR817914 and KR817915, respectively.

1.6. Real-time PCR

Real-time PCR reactions were performed using 2X Thermo Scientific Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Fisher Scientific, Germany) and run in an iCycler iQ5 (Bio RAD, USA) instrument. The reaction was carried out in a total volume of 20 µl containing 10 µl of 2X master mix, 200 nmol of each forward and reverse primer, and 2 µl of 10-fold serially diluted of HeLa cDNA or pTG19/HPRT1 plasmid as templates. Cycling condition involved an enzyme activation step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. In each cycle, an extra step of 72 °C for 10 s was included to collect fluorescence. At the end of PCR, to evaluate specific amplification of the target genes, melting curves ranging from 60 to 95 °C were also included in each run. The slope, intercept, amplification efficiency, and correlation coefficient (R2) of the primer pair were calculated as described previously [5]. The regression line had the correlation coefficient (R2 value) of 0.999 and the reaction efficiency was calculated 99.5% that confirmed accurate real-time results (Fig. 2A). The melt curve analysis also confirmed the specific amplification of HPRT1 mRNA with no evidence for primer dimer or nonspecific products (Fig. 2B). The importance of pseudogene-free amplification of the housekeeping gene in qRT-PCR has been emphasized for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [6], and the data provided here also indicate that primers should be carefully selected for HPRT1 to ensure accurate transcripts quantification in qRT-PCR.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Representative amplification plots obtained from a 10-fold serial dilution. The corresponding standard curve showed a slope of line −3.335, efficiency 99.5% and R2 0.999 (A). Melting curves and melting peaks of the serial dilution confirmed a specific amplification (B).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center (MCBRC), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (grant number 1658); and the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), Iran (grant number 91002930).

References

  • 1.Valadan R., Amjadi O., Tehrani M., Rafiei A., Hedayatizadeh-Omran A., Alizadeh-Navaei R. Pseudogene-free amplification of HPRT1 in qRT-PCR. Anal. Biochem. 2015;485:46–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel P.I., Nussbaum R.L., gramson P.E., Ledbetter D.H., Caskey C.T., Chinault A.C. Organization of the HPRT gene and related sequences in the human genome. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 1984;10:483–493. doi: 10.1007/BF01534853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nicklas J.A. Pseudogenes of the human HPRT1 gene. Environ. Mol. Mutag. 2006;47:212–218. doi: 10.1002/em.20187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun Y., Li Y., Luo D., Liao D.J. Pseudogenes as weaknesses of ACTB (Actb) and GAPDH (Gapdh) used as reference genes in reverse transcription and polymerase chain reactions. PloS One. 2012;7:e41659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmittgen T.D., Livak K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harper L.V., Hilton A.C., Jones A.F. RT-PCR for the pseudogene-free amplification of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gapd) Mol. Cell Probes. 2003;17:261–265. doi: 10.1016/s0890-8508(03)00063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES