Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2015 Jul 22;6:556. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00556

Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in Vitis vinifera

Birsen Çakır 1,*, Ozan Kılıçkaya 2
PMCID: PMC4511077  PMID: 26257761

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most important mechanisms to control cellular functions in response to external and endogenous signals. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are universal signaling molecules in eukaryotes that mediate the intracellular transmission of extracellular signals resulting in the induction of appropriate cellular responses. MAPK cascades are composed of four protein kinase modules: MAPKKK kinases (MAPKKKKs), MAPKK kinases (MAPKKKs), MAPK kinases (MAPKKs), and MAPKs. In plants, MAPKs are activated in response to abiotic stresses, wounding, and hormones, and during plant pathogen interactions and cell division. In this report, we performed a complete inventory of MAPK cascades genes in Vitis vinifera, the whole genome of which has been sequenced. By comparison with MAPK, MAPK kinases, MAPK kinase kinases and MAPK kinase kinase kinase kinase members of Arabidopsis thaliana, we revealed the existence of 14 MAPKs, 5 MAPKKs, 62 MAPKKKs, and 7 MAPKKKKs in Vitis vinifera. We identified orthologs of V. vinifera putative MAPKs in different species, and ESTs corresponding to members of MAPK cascades in various tissues. This work represents the first complete inventory of MAPK cascades in V. vinifera and could help elucidate the biological and physiological functions of these proteins in V. vinifera.

Keywords: MAP kinase, Vitis vinifera, signal transduction, protein phosphorylation

Introduction

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are higly conserved modules of signal transduction in eucaryotes including yeast, animals, and plants. MAPK cascades play an important role in protein phosphorylation of signal transduction events (Rodriguez et al., 2010). MAPK cascades typically consist of three protein kinases, MAPK, MAPK kinase (MAPKK), and MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK), but sometimes include MAP3K kinase (MAP4K) that phosphorylate the corresponding downstream substrates (Jonak et al., 2002; Champion et al., 2004).

MAPK is activated via phophorylation of conserved threonine (T) and tyrosine (Y) residues in the catalytic subdomain by its specific MAPKK, which is in turn activated by phophorylation of two serine/threonine residues in a conserved S/T-X33-5-S/T motif by an upstream MAPKKK (Stulemeijer et al., 2007; Zaïdi et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2011). Upon activation, the MAPK could be translocated into the nucleus or cytoplasm to trigger the cellular responses through phosphorylation of downstream transcription factors or components of transcription machinery while some MAP kinases, like ERK3, are constitutively present in the nucleus and may function in the nucleus (Lee et al., 2004; Pedley and Martin, 2005; Fiil et al., 2009; Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). MAPKKK is usually activated by a G protein, but sometimes activation is mediated via an upstream MAP4K (Champion et al., 2004).

MAPK proteins contain 11 evolutionary conserved kinase domains that may be involved in substrate specifity or protein-protein interaction (Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). MAPK cascade proteins have TEY or TDY phophorylation motifs in the region between kinase domains VII and VIII (Group et al., 2002), which provides a protein-binding domain for the activation of MAPKs (Rohila and Yang, 2007).

In plants, MAPKs are involved in cellular responses to hormones, plant growth and development, regulation of the cell cycle, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Jonak et al., 1993; Wilson et al., 1997; Zhang and Klessig, 1997; Bögre et al., 1999; Nishihama et al., 2001; Bergmann et al., 2004; Lukowitz et al., 2004; Katou et al., 2005; Meng et al., 2012).

A variety of genes encoding MAPKs have been cloned from Arabidopsis, rice, tobacco and barley, and oat (Huttly and Phillips, 1995; Knetsch et al., 1996; Mizoguchi et al., 1998; Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010; Zaïdi et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2014). The Arabidopsis genome contains 20 MAPK genes (Group et al., 2002; Jonak et al., 2002). MAPK genes such as AtMPK4 and AtMPK6, have been identified in Arabidopsis (Ichimura et al., 1998, 2000; Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). It has been reported that MAPK genes are involved in biotic and abiotic stress responses (Mizoguchi et al., 1996; Ichimura et al., 2000; Asai et al., 2002; Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). For example, OsMAPK3, OsMAPK6, and the MAPK kinase OsMKK4 are induced by a chitin elicitor in rice and the activated form of OsMKK4 induces cell death (Kishi-Kaboshi et al., 2010). Similarly, NtWIPK, OsMPK5, and AtMPK3 were activated by pathogens and abiotic stresses (Zhang and Klessig, 2001; Hamel et al., 2006; Rohila and Yang, 2007). AtMPK4 and AtMPK6 are activated by osmotic stress, low humidity, low temperature, and wounding (Ichimura et al., 2000; Teige et al., 2004). AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 are also regulated by biotic elicitors via AtMKK4/5 and AtMPK4 is a negative regulator of defense response (Asai et al., 2002). In addition, AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 are involved in the embryo, anther and inflorescence development and stomatal distribution on the leaf surface (Bergmann et al., 2004; Gray and Hetherington, 2004; Bush and Krysan, 2007).

MKKs are activated by the phosphorylation on conserved serine and threonine residues in the S/T-X3-5-S/T motif and characterized by a putative MAPK-docking domain K/R-K/R-K/R-X1-6-L-X-L/V/S, and a kinase domain (Group et al., 2002). To date, many MAPKKs have been identified from several plant species. All the identified MAPKK genes from Arabidopsis, rice and poplar contain 11 catalytic subdomains (Ichimura et al., 2002; Rao et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2014c). In Arabidopsis, MKK1 was activated by wounding and abiotic stress (Matsuoka et al., 2002). Alfalfa SIMKK mediates both salt and elicitor-induced signals (Kiegerl et al., 2000; Cardinale et al., 2002). NtMEK2 activates SIPK and WIPK resulting in cell death (Yang et al., 2001).

MAPKKKs form the largest class of MAPK cascade enzymes with 80 members classified into three subfamilies, MEKK, Raf, and ZIK containing 21, 11, and 48 genes, respectively in Arabidopsis (Jonak et al., 2002). Plant MAPKKKs are characterized by different primary structures of their kinase domains, but are conserved within a single group (Champion et al., 2004). The MEKK subfamily comprises a conserved kinase domain of G(T/S)Px(W/Y/F)MAPEV (Jonak et al., 2002). The ZIK subfamily contains GTPEFMAPE(L/V)Y while the Raf subfamily has GTxx(W/Y)MAPE (Jonak et al., 2002). All the MAPKKK proteins have a kinase domain, and most of them have a serine/threonine protein kinase active site (Wang et al., 2015). In the RAF subfamily, most of the proteins have a long N-terminal regulatory domain and C-terminal kinase domain. By contrast, majority of the members in the ZIK subfamily have an N-terminal kinase domain (Wang et al., 2015). However, the MEKK subfamily has a less conserved protein structure with a kinase domain located either at the C- or N-terminal or in the central part of the protein (Wang et al., 2015). Homologs of MAPKKKs have been identified in plant species such as alfalfa, Arabidopsis, tobacco (Kovtun et al., 2000; Nishihama et al., 2001; Lukowitz et al., 2004; Nakagami et al., 2004). The MEKK subfamily contains NPK1, NbMAPKKKα, NbMAPKKKγ, NbMAPKKKε in tobacco (Jin et al., 2002; del Pozo et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2004; Melech-Bonfil and Sessa, 2010), MEKK1 in Arabidopsis (Asai et al., 2002), and SIMAPKKKα and SIMAPKKKε in tomato (Oh et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2014). The second subfamily, Raf, includes Arabidopsis CTR1/raf1 (Kieber et al., 1993), EDR/Raf2 (Frye et al., 2001), and DSM1 in rice (Ning et al., 2010). In Arabidopsis, MEKK1 regulates defense responses against different pathogens including bacteria and fungi (Asai et al., 2002; Qiu et al., 2008; Galletti et al., 2011). In addition, AtEDR1, a Raf-like MAPKKK, regulates SA-inducible defense responses (Frye et al., 2001). The ZIK subfamily which contains 10 and 9 members in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively, are able to regulate flowering time and circadian rhythms (Wang et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2011).

A putative phosphorylation domain T/Sx5T/S is found between domains VII and VIII in MAP4Ks, which is identical to the phosphorylation motif of MAPKKs from plants (Jouannic et al., 1999; Ichimura et al., 2002). Both domains participate in peptide-substrate recognition (Champion et al., 2004). MAP4Ks can be linked to the plasma membrane through association with a small GTPase or lipid (Qi and Elion, 2005). They are directly activated by stimulated interaction with adaptor proteins (Qi and Elion, 2005). The MAP4Ks are divided into eight classes including PAK-related, Gck, Mst, Tao, Ste/PAK, Sok (Champion et al., 2004). The majority of MAP4Ks are from the large class of Ste20 protein kinases, which exhibit a highly diverse noncatalytic domain (Dan et al., 2001). The PAKs, which have a C-terminal catalytic domain, are separated from the GC Kinase-related polypeptides, which contain an N-terminal catalytic domain (Dan et al., 2001). Most of the MAP4Ks contain an N-terminal catalytic domain, but members of the STE20/PAK group have a C-terminal kinase domain and some plant MAP4Ks have their kinase domain in the middle of the sequences (Leprince et al., 1999). The Arabidopsis genome contains 10 putative MAP4Ks (Champion et al., 2004). A maize gene encoding MIK is a GCK-like kinase being a subfamily of MAP4K (Llompart et al., 2003), which relates membrane-located receptors to MAP kinases (Dan et al., 2001). Some MAP4K are able to phosphorylate MEKK or Raf members whereas other MAP4Ks either phosphorylate MAPKKs or function as adaptors (Champion et al., 2004).

However, the functions of most MAPK genes in plants are still unknown. Although MAPK cascades are involved in signaling multiple defense responses, the role of Vitis MAPK cascades in response to biotic and abiotic stresses are not elucidated. In previous studies in grapevine, a few components of the MAPK gene family were isolated (Wang et al., 2014a). In addition, the gene family of MAPKKKs were identified and their expression profiles were analyzed in different organs in response to different stresses (Wang et al., 2014b). Interestingly, the expression of VvMAP kinase gene was induced by salinity and drought (Daldoul et al., 2012). However, the MAPKK and the MAPKKKK subfamilies have not yet been characterized. To explore the role of MAPK cascade proteins in biotic and abiotic stress responses in grapevine, the publicly available grapevine genome (Jaillon et al., 2007) was analyzed to identify all members of MAPK cascade proteins. Using these databases, we characterized all members of MAPK cascades of V. vinifera and performed a phylogenetic analysis in comparison with members of Arabidopsis MAPK cascade proteins.

Materials and methods

Genome-wide identification of MAPK cascade genes in grapevine

The MAPK cascade protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana were used to search against the V. vinifera proteome 12× database (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/GenomeBrowser/Vitis/) using a BLASTP analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) (Altschul et al., 1990) with scores higher than 400 and an “E” value > e-120 (Çakır and Kılıçkaya, 2013). The sequences of Arabidopsis MAPK cascade proteins were obtained from the TAİR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/). MAPK domain (PS01351), ATP-binding domain (PS00107), protein kinase domain (PS50011), serine/threonine protein kinase active site (PS00108) were identified in the sequences of polypeptides corresponding to V. vinifera MAPK cascade proteins by the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) and PROSITE (http://prosite.expasy.org/) (Marchler-Bauer et al., 2009). In addition, the NCBI non-redundant protein database was screened with each sequence in order to independently validate the automatic annotation.

Multiple-sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction

Multiple-sequence alignments of the putative MAPK cascade proteins were aligned using CLUSTAL W and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by both the maximum parsimony and distance with neighbor-joining methods with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Saitou and Nei, 1987; Thompson et al., 1994). The phylogenetic tree was illustrated using MEGA5. Because similar results were obtained with both methods, only the single tree retrieved from the distance analysis is discussed in detail.

For MAPK cascade subfamilies from both V. vinifera and A. thaliana, multiple sequence alignment was performed using the multiple sequence comparison by log-expectation (MUSCLE) alignment tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/) (Edgar, 2004). The phylogenetic analysis was performed using a neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates andvisualized with MEGA5 software (Tamura et al., 2011). The protein theoretical molecular weight and isoelectric point were predicted using compute pI/MW (http://au.expasy.org/tools).

Orthology analysis and database search

Orthology analysis was performed using the PHOG web server (http://phylofacts.berkeley.edu/orthologs/) (Datta et al., 2009). The sequences of conserved domains with similarity over 70% and an “E” value of 0.0 were selected as queries. The selected sequences of conserved domains from different species were then used in a BLASTP search against the V. vinifera protein sequence database. The best hits were annotated as putative orthologous sequences (Moreno-Hagelsieb and Latimer, 2008).

Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were identified by BLASTn of the V. vinifera expressed sequence tag (EST) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST). Using the sequences of all of the MAPK cascade proteins as queries. The positives sequences were then confirmed by alignment with the query ORF.

Results and discussion

Genome-wide identification of MAPK cascade genes in Vitis vinifera

Vitis vinifera MAPK cascade sequences were mined from the grapevine genome proteome 12x database (Jaillon et al., 2007). We identified 88 ORFs encoding putative MAPK cascade proteins containing at least MAPK domain by BLAST searches of the grapevine genome proteome 12× database with the amino acid sequences of the MAPK cascade proteins from A. thaliana as queries (Table 1). The completed Vitis genome contains 14 MAPKs, 5 MAPKKs, 62 MAPKKKs, and 7 MAPKKKKs (Table 1).

Table 1.

Detailed inventory of the Vitis MAPK cascade proteins.

Subfamily name 12X Vitis vinifera ID NCBI GenBank ID Chr Str Genomic location Gene length in bp CDS length in bp Length of protein in AA Number of Exon Number of Intron pI mW (kDa)
VvMPKs
VvMPK1 GSVIVT01000784001 CBI31754.3 12 + 124452–133238 8787 1518 505 10 9 9.34 57.43
VvMPK2 GSVIVT01005924001 CBI35594.3 7 + 886169–898284 12116 1341 446 16 15 5.40 51.22
VvMPK3 GSVIVT01008408001 CBI15552.3 17 + 2368190–2377747 9558 1806 601 11 10 6.89 67.98
VvMPK4 GSVIVT01009766001 CBI19748.3 18 + 11125765–11129338 3574 588 195 4 3 5.44 22.50
VvMPK5 GSVIVT01011749001 CBI26902.3 1 4565334–4574753 9420 1842 613 11 10 8.68 70.46
VvMPK6 GSVIVT01014081001 CBI20098.3 19 + 224299–234190 9892 1797 599 10 9 9.21 67.79
VvMPK7 GSVIVT01017873001 CBI26170.3 5 4205509–4215917 10409 1692 563 10 9 8.59 64.03
VvMPK8 GSVIVT01018883001 CBI17457.3 4 + 18974001–19005635 31635 2310 769 10 9 5.51 87.48
VvMPK9 GSVIVT01019406001 CBI34380.3 2 380310–386888 6579 1128 375 6 5 5.86 42.80
VvMPK10 GSVIVT01022771001 CBI37450.3 2 + 16326975–16335400 8426 1359 452 16 15 9.62 51.58
VvMPK11 GSVIVT01025091001 CBI16237.3 6 + 4580755–4584961 4207 1116 371 6 5 4.94 42.53
VvMPK12 GSVIVT01025105001 CBI16244.3 6 4432854–4436338 3485 990 329 6 5 5.52 38.17
VvMPK13 GSVIVT01026984001 CBI40425.3 15 18821560–18826926 5367 1128 375 6 5 6.43 43.27
VvMPK14 GSVIVT01038192001 CBI24707.3 5 + 24220238–24241107 20870 993 330 6 5 5.64 38.37
VvMAPKKs
VvMKK1 GSVIVT01008476001 CBI15608.3 17 + 1537423–1538551 1129 675 224 3 2 6.38 24.66
VvMKK2 GSVIVT01015155001 CBI27870.3 11 + 1417439–1424337 6899 1065 355 8 7 6.00 39.28
VvMKK3 GSVIVT01015283001 CBI27984.3 11 + 2377698–2381398 3701 1065 355 8 7 6.02 39.98
VvMKK4 GSVIVT01016115001 CBI25274.3 9 + 19257788–19265261 7474 1188 396 5 4 10.15 43.78
VvMKK5 GSVIVT01032414001 CBI34873.3 14 27139003–27145873 6871 1557 519 9 8 5.56 57.61
VvMAPKKKs
VviMAPKKK1 GSVIVT01000047001 CBI36768.3 14 + 3063647–3072319 8673 1992 664 17 16 5.36 72.89
VviMAPKKK2 GSVIVT01000256001 CBI27711.3 7 + 20596048–20597073 1026 921 307 2 1 8.97 33.93
VviMAPKKK3 GSVIVT01001193001 CBI28728.3 7 + 944892–950225 5334 1215 405 6 5 7.03 44.92
VviMAPKKK4 GSVIVT01001690001 CBI35506.3 18 14296312–14329573 33262 1653 551 16 15 5.07 61.80
VviMAPKKK5 GSVIVT01002332001 CBI35719.3 Un + 34161697–34167622 5926 696 232 7 6 9.43 26.14
VviMAPKKK6 GSVIVT01004254001 CBI18826.3 Un + 37734319–37739476 5158 1158 386 10 9 9.51 43.07
VviMAPKKK7 GSVIVT01007446001 CBI25853.3 Un + 31988209–31995727 7519 2124 708 11 10 9.73 77.57
VviMAPKKK8 GSVIVT01007637001 CBI14941.3 17 10966272–10980533 14262 1464 488 9 8 5.47 54.86
VviMAPKKK9 GSVIVT01007646001 CBI14949.3 17 + 10874999–10877438 2440 1059 353 6 5 8.13 40.08
VviMAPKKK10 GSVIVT01007762001 CBI15038.3 17 + 9308908–9314007 5100 909 303 3 2 7.97 34.37
VviMAPKKK11 GSVIVT01007775001 CBI15048.3 17 9166428–9172256 5829 1050 350 6 5 7.02 38.56
VviMAPKKK12 GSVIVT01008413001 CBI15555.3 17 2321687–2342403 20717 2697 899 16 15 5.24 99.09
VviMAPKKK13 GSVIVT01008728001 CBI18907.3 18 1477098–1491666 14569 1569 523 16 15 6.67 59.46
VviMAPKKK14 GSVIVT01008938001 CBI19081.3 18 3594893–3606331 11439 822 274 8 7 6.45 30.15
VviMAPKKK15 GSVIVT01009192001 CBI19282.3 18 5939861–5949524 9664 2718 906 15 14 8.41 101.48
VviMAPKKK16 GSVIVT01009575001 CBI19581.3 18 + 9549009–9561275 12267 1101 367 10 9 8.39 40.91
VviMAPKKK17 GSVIVT01012031001 CBI27127.3 1 2006896–2039042 32147 4191 1397 25 24 5.73 154.60
VviMAPKKK18 GSVIVT01012116001 CBI27196.3 1 + 1303636–1315494 11859 3717 1239 11 10 5.32 136.73
VviMAPKKK19 GSVIVT01012632001 CBI23172.3 10 + 222774–228777 6004 1287 429 4 3 5.48 48.37
VviMAPKKK20 GSVIVT01012686001 CBI23211.3 10 + 641937–648890 6954 3369 1123 8 7 6.09 123.96
VviMAPKKK21 GSVIVT01012895001 CBI25598.3 11 + 6576324–6581862 5539 1470 490 9 8 5.40 54.29
VviMAPKKK22 GSVIVT01015494001 CBI28162.3 11 4194704–4202353 7650 3066 1022 7 6 8.36 114.09
VviMAPKKK23 GSVIVT01017915001 CBI26208.3 5 + 4619229–4633132 13904 2061 687 17 16 6.76 75.81
VviMAPKKK24 GSVIVT01017968001 CBI26245.3 5 + 5145293–5148759 3467 1632 544 11 10 5.43 63.24
VviMAPKKK25 GSVIVT01018020001 CBI26291.3 5 5521761–5528578 6818 1371 457 7 6 8.32 51.27
VviMAPKKK26 GSVIVT01018052001 CBI26318.3 5 + 5824109–5839208 15100 3354 1118 11 10 5.59 124.59
VviMAPKKK27 GSVIVT01019010001 CBI17559.3 4 + 17821355–17829046 7692 906 302 5 4 6.66 33.93
VviMAPKKK28 GSVIVT01019630001 CBI34567.3 2 + 2093246–2099598 6353 1791 597 16 15 6.59 68.4
VviMAPKKK29 GSVIVT01019739001 CBI34657.3 2 + 2874833–2882840 8008 2706 902 11 10 9.12 97.91
VviMAPKKK30 GSVIVT01019821001 CBI34722.3 2 + 3631707–3639546 7840 2088 696 15 14 6.37 78.14
VviMAPKKK31 GSVIVT01020712001 CBI21988.3 12 + 2837402–2887099 49698 2454 818 11 10 5.99 91.70
VviMAPKKK32 GSVIVT01021854001 CBI34208.3 14 6462432–6466040 3609 1821 607 10 9 5.22 69.40
VviMAPKKK33 GSVIVT01021884001 CBI34231.3 14 6026347–6048725 22379 2631 877 16 15 5.50 97.14
VviMAPKKK34 GSVIVT01022098001 CBI21399.3 7 + 16573422–16578723 5302 1287 429 8 7 5.31 47.06
VviMAPKKK35 GSVIVT01022115001 CBI21414.3 7 16707463–16710545 3083 1233 411 8 7 4.66 44.78
VviMAPKKK36 GSVIVT01022116001 CBI21415.3 7 + 16711209–16721450 10242 2469 823 7 6 8.72 89.41
VviMAPKKK37 GSVIVT01023037001 CBI23895.3 12 + 16524280–16552240 27961 1296 432 11 10 7.05 48.78
VviMAPKKK38 GSVIVT01023048001 CBI23901.3 12 + 16381443–16399280 178238 525 175 5 4 8.42 20.19
VviMAPKKK39 GSVIVT01023216001 CBI29680.3 12 + 21019776–21020867 1092 1092 364 1 0 8.88 39.99
VviMAPKKK40 GSVIVT01023958001 CBI37812.3 3 2141138–2162161 21024 1743 581 16 15 5.56 65.53
VviMAPKKK41 GSVIVT01024578001 CBI15829.3 6 8664971–8669192 4222 1896 632 7 6 6.83 71.74
VviMAPKKK42 GSVIVT01026487001 CBI37539.3 4 + 22814276–22820209 5934 1803 601 12 11 8.99 65.01
VviMAPKKK43 GSVIVT01026546001 CBI37576.3 4 + 21993962–21997860 3899 1701 567 10 9 5.52 64.16
VviMAPKKK44 GSVIVT01027189001 CBI40585.3 15 17151471–17154829 3359 1776 592 10 9 5.82 67.45
VviMAPKKK45 GSVIVT01028897001 CBI22687.3 16 17707492–17719297 11806 2679 893 11 10 9.43 95.93
VviMAPKKK46 GSVIVT01029055001 CBI33351.3 5 + 11545076–11551320 6345 2859 953 13 12 5.42 105.79
VviMAPKKK47 GSVIVT01029147001 CBI17788.3 11 + 19186659–19204657 17999 2937 979 11 10 5.40 108.81
VviMAPKKK48 GSVIVT01029426001 CBI35320.3 17 + 17077436–17089089 11654 555 185 4 3 5.62 21.36
VviMAPKKK49 GSVIVT01030044001 CBI28411.3 12 9089290–9097431 8142 2496 832 8 7 8.80 93.29
VviMAPKKK50 GSVIVT01030194001 CBI18047.3 8 + 10650328–10661181 10854 1014 338 6 5 8.85 37.96
VviMAPKKK51 GSVIVT01030202001 CBI18051.3 8 10519384–10524077 4694 1881 627 7 6 5.29 71.71
VviMAPKKK52 GSVIVT01031721001 CBI32391.3 3 3812818–3816504 3687 1194 398 8 7 8.32 43.57
VviMAPKKK53 GSVIVT01032232001 CBI24046.3 11 + 13477774–13485357 7584 447 149 3 2 5.90 16.90
VviMAPKKK54 GSVIVT01032389001 CBI34850.3 14 26886951–26893203 6253 1059 353 6 5 6.90 39.53
VviMAPKKK55 GSVIVT01032487001 CBI34936.3 14 + 27812667–27819608 6942 1083 361 6 5 6.34 40.52
VviMAPKKK56 GSVIVT01033779001 CBI30245.3 8 17884683–17902051 17369 2238 746 17 16 6.14 82.96
VviMAPKKK57 GSVIVT01034710001 CBI40217.3 13 8150739–8202754 52016 2277 759 15 14 7.89 85.25
VviMAPKKK58 GSVIVT01034988001 CBI22876.3 5 694778–701765 6988 2199 733 14 13 6.42 81.58
VviMAPKKK59 GSVIVT01035409001 CBI20668.3 4 + 1079723–1090460 10738 2631 877 15 14 5.26 97.28
VviMAPKKK60 GSVIVT01036758001 CBI24172.3 19 22924599–22935504 10906 3138 1046 10 9 5.23 115.67
VviMAPKKK61 GSVIVT01037773001 CBI26734.3 19 7730105–7732118 2014 894 298 2 1 6.17 34.22
VviMAPKKK62 GSVIVT01038760001 CBI32969.3 12 + 610174–641062 30889 1476 492 8 7 6.05 55.76
VvMAPKKKKs
VvMAP4K1 GSVIVT01012233001 CBI27303.3 5 + 7076729–7078360 1632 1362 454 4 3 5.20 88.93
VvMAP4K2 GSVIVT01013739001 CBI28527.3 9 18395010–18410644 15635 1704 568 15 14 9.31 41.78
VvMAP4K3 GSVIVT01014297001 CBI20268.3 1 8012586–8021182 8597 1107 369 9 8 6.34 78.12
VvMAP4K4 GSVIVT01016074001 CBI25246.3 14 27646939–27657107 10169 1803 601 16 15 5.58 62.83
VvMAP4K5 GSVIVT01019643001 CBI34578.3 2 2150787–2160118 9332 2190 730 22 21 6.68 81.13
VvMAP4K6 GSVIVT01027718001 CBI23577.3 1 342583–373752 31170 2430 810 19 18 5.80 50.65
VvMAP4K7 GSVIVT01032461001 CBI34913.3 19 2416077–2441445 25369 2121 707 20 19 5.81 67.08

The identified open reading frames (ORFs) are classified into four subfamilies, MAPK, MAPKK, MAPKKK, and MAPKKKK. Columns 1–13 contain the protein acronym (Name), coding sequence (CDS), Vitis proteome 12× ID, GenBank ID, chromosome location (Chr), strand (str), gene length, number of introns and exons, protein length, estimates of molecular weight, and isoelectric point of the protein (pI) for each gene are given.

Phylogenetic analysis

All predicted MAPK cascade family sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 1994). A rooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by alignment of full length amino acid sequences using the MEGA5 program and maximum parsimony and distance with neighbor-joining methods (Saitou and Nei, 1987) (Figure 1). One thousand bootstrap replicates were produced for each analysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Construction of phylogenetic tree of Vitis MAPK cascade proteins. The amino sequences of all Vitis ABC proteins were aligned using the ClustalW program and were subjected to phylogenetic analysis by the distance with neighbor-joining method. The reliabilities of each branch point, as assessed by the analysis of 1000 computer-generated trees (bootstrap replicates), were in excess of 90%, except for those discussed in the text. The abbreviations of MAPK cascade proteins are as follows: MAPK, Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase; MAPKK, MAPK Kinase; MAPKKK, MAPKK Kinase; MAPKKKK, MAPKKK Kinase as described in the text.

Vitis MAPK cascade sequences can be divided into four subfamilies on the basis of the presence of conserved threonine and tyrosine residues in the motif TxY located in the activation loop (T-loop) between kinase subdomains VII and VIII. In addition, we identified MAPKKKK subfamily with 7 members in Vitis genome, which has the conserved amino acid motifs TFVGTPxWMAPEV as described (Jonak et al., 2002). The members of four subfamilies clustered more tightly with each other than with members of other subfamilies (Figure 1).

MAPKs

The phylogenetic analysis showed that the VvMAPKs were devided into five distinct groups, which is higher than previous reports (Kumar and Kirti, 2010; Nadarajah and Sidek, 2010). Group V MAPKs are found only in the grapevine genome among other plant species. All of identified ORFs encoding MAPK were named VvMPK1 through 14. Hyun et al. (2010) reported 12 MAPKs based on 8x sequence coverage in grapevine genome whereas we identified a total of 14 ORFs in Vitis 12x genome coverage (Hyun et al., 2010), which may be due to the errors corrected in 12x genome sequence coverage. The grapevine genome contains less MAPKs than Arabidopsis (20 MAPKs) (Ichimura et al., 2002) and rice (17 MAPKs) (Liu and Xue, 2007). Members of the Vitis MAPK subfamily show 20–86% identity to each other. Full length MAPK proteins ranged in size from 195 to 769 amino acids (Table 1). Variation in length of the entire MAPK gene is usually due to differences in the length of MAPK domain and/or, due to the number of introns. The difference in length among MAPK genes may indicate the presence or absence of motifs which could affect functional specifity.

VvMPK12, VvMPK14 belong to the group I., which contains well-characterized MAPK genes including AtMPK3, AtMPK6 (Figure 2). It has been demonstrated that AtMPK3, OsMPK5 were activated in response to pathogens and abiotic stresses (Zhang and Klessig, 2001; Hamel et al., 2006; Rohila and Yang, 2007). OsMPK5 plays an important role for the resistance to blast disease (Song and Goodman, 2002; Huang et al., 2011). AtMPK6 can be activated by various abiotic and biotic stresses (Ichimura et al., 2000; Yuasa et al., 2001; Feilner et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2011). Similarly, PtrMAPK is involved in resistance to both dehydration and cold (Huang et al., 2011).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship of Arabidopsis and Vitis MAPK proteins. The amino acid sequences of all Arabidopsis MAPK proteins and those of Vitis vinifera were aligned using the MUSCLE program and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by the distance with neighborjoining method using MEGA5 programme. Accession numbers for Arabidopsis sequences are AtMPK1 (At1g10210), AtMPK2 (At1g59580), AtMPK3 (At3g45640), AtMPK4 (At4g01370), AtMPK5 (At4g11330), AtMPK6 (At2g43790), AtMPK7 (At2g18170), AtMPK8 (At1g18150), AtMPK9 (At3g18040), AtMPK10 (At3g59790), AtMPK11 (At1g01560), AtMPK12 (At2g46070), AtMPK13 (At1g07880), AtMPK14 (At4g36450), AtMPK15 (At1g73670), AtMPK16 (At5g19010), AtMPK17 (At2g01450), AtMPK18 (At1g53510), AtMPK19 (At3g14720), AtMPK20 (At2g42880).

Group II MAPKs are involved in both abiotic stresses and cell division in Arabidopsis. VvMPK13, VvMPK11, and VvMPK9 are clustered with Group II., which includes AtMPK4, AtMPK5, AtMPK12, and AtMPK11. AtMPK4 and its upstream MAPKK AtMKK2 can be activated by biotic and abiotic stresses (Ichimura et al., 2000; Teige et al., 2004).

VvMPK4 and VvMPK8 belong to group III. AtMPK1 in the group III is regulated by salt stress treatment (Mizoguchi et al., 1996). In addition, AtMPK1 and AtMPK2 are activated by ABA (Ortiz-Masia et al., 2007). The group III genes, such as rice BWMK1 and alfalfa TDY1, are activated by wounding and pathogens (Nowak et al., 1997; Lynch et al., 2001).

Group IV, which includes VvMPK1, VvMPK3, VvMPK5, VvMPK6, and VvMPK7 of the Vitis MAPKs, have the TDY motif in their T-loop and the absence of the C-terminal CD domain, which is consistently found in members of the other MAPK groups. VvMPK2 and VvMPK10 belonging to group V were separated from other groups.

The orthology analysis program identified one hundred-fourteen orthologs from various plant species for this subfamily (Table 2). The VvMPK3 amino acid sequence shows 83% similarity with AtMPK9, and VvMPK12 shows 84% similarity with AtMPK3 from A. thaliana. The members of VvMAPK subfamily share between 75.8 and 91.8% similarity to the MAPK members from Ricius communis, Oryza sativa, and A. thaliana. The phylogenetic analysis of A. thaliana and V. vinifera MAPK subfamilies confirmed the orthologs of VvMPK14/AtMPK6, VvMPK12/AtMPK3, VvMAPK11/AtMAPK13, VvMPK13/AtMPK12, VvMPK7/AtMPK16, and VvMPK3/AtMPK9 (Figure 2).

Table 2.

Orthologs of Vitis MAPK cascade proteins identified in diverse plant species.

Subfamily name Vitis proteome 12× ID Species %ID UniprotKB ID
VvMPK1 GSVIVT01000784001 Ricinus communis 82.7 B9H811_POPTR
VvMPK2 GSVIVT01005924001 Ricinus communis 75.8 B9SYK7_RICCO
VvMPK3 GSVIVT01008408001 Populus trichocarpa 84.0 B9I2G2_POPTR
Brassica napus 82.0 Q5XU40_BRANA
Arabidopsis thaliana 81.8 MPK9_ARATH
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 81.2 D7L7Z0_ARALL
Oryza sativa subsp. Indica 77.6 B3GCL0_ORYSI
Ricinus communis 76.6 B9T7E7_RICCO
Zea mays 75.7 B4F907_MAIZE
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 75.6 MPK16_ORYSJ
VvMPK6 GSVIVT01014081001 Ricinus communis 80.1 B9SR58_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 78.7 B9GGZ4_POPTR
VvMPK7 GSVIVT01017873001 Ricinus communis 90.9 B9RSS7_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 90.2 B9HY78_POPTR
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 84.7 D7LYJ6_ARALL
Arabidopsis thaliana 84.5 MPK16_ARATH
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 83.6 MPK15_ORYSJ
Oryza sativa subsp. Indica 83.2 B3GCK9_ORYSI
Zea mays 79.9 Q6TAR9_MAIZE
Triticum aestivum 77.9 A9RAB1_WHEAT
VvMPK9 GSVIVT01019406001 Populus trichocarpa 91.4 B9GWV0_POPTR
Papaver rhoeas 89.3 Q683Y4_9MAGN
Ricinus communis 87.4 B9RCG7_RICCO
Solanum tuberosum 84.8 Q8LT16_SOLTU
Sorghum bicolor 82.7 C5YH06_SORBI
Medicago truncatula 81.9 B7FK53_MEDTR
VvMPK10 GSVIVT01022771001 Populus trichocarpa 75.7 B9GZV6_POPTR
VvMPK11 GSVIVT01025091001 Nicotiana attenuate 86.6 A5H7H6_NICAT
Ricinus communis 86.0 B9SW68_RICCO
Malus domestica 85.3 D1MFM2_MALDO
Solanum lycopersicum 83.5 E2GLN8_SOLLC
Nicotiana benthamiana 83.5 B2NIC1_NICBE
Medicago sativa 82.7 Q9ZP91_MEDSA
Nicotiana tabacum 82.7 NTF6_TOBAC
Solanum tuberosum 82.7 Q8LT15_SOLTU
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 80.4 D7KHW6_ARALL
Arabidopsis thaliana 79.8 MPK13_ARATH
VvMPK12 GSVIVT01025105001 Citrus sinensis 90.3 A2IB54_CITSI
Populus trichocarpa 90.0 B9HNK3_POPTR
Catharanthus roseus 89.7 B8LFE0_CATRO
Cucumis sativus 89.3 Q0R4I2_CUCSA
Solanum lycopersicum 86.9 Q84MI4_SOLLC
Medicago truncatula 86.8 B7FJD9_MEDTR
Solanum peruvianum 86.6 A8VJL7_SOLPE
Solanum tuberosum 86.6 Q3V6C4_SOLTU
Nicotiana attenuate 86.6 A5H2L1_NICAT
Ricinus communis 86.4 B9T1Z7_RICCO
Capsicum annuum 86.3 Q9LKZ2_CAPAN
Nicotiana benthamiana 86.3 Q8H0B4_NICBE
Nicotiana tabacum 86.0 Q8W406_TOBAC
Pisum sativum 86.0 Q9M6S1_PEA
Brassica napus 86.0 Q5IV18_BRANA
Medicago sativa 85.7 O24077_MEDSA
Petroselinum crispum 85.7 O04694_PETCR
Glycine max 85.4 Q5K6Q4_SOYBN
Arabidopsis thaliana 84.2 MPK3_ARATH
Saccharum officinarum 78.2 Q4QWQ7_SACOF
Oryza sativa subsp.iÝndica 77.6 MPK5_ORYSI
Avena sativa 77.3 Q43379_AVESA
VvMPK13 GSVIVT01026984001 Nicotiana attenuate 90.7 A5H7H4_NICAT
Ricinus communis 90.5 B9RDW5_RICCO
Glycine max 89.9 C6TEP0_SOYBN
Populus trichocarpa 89.2 B9GQC1_POPTR
Malus hupehensis 89.2 B1N8Y5_9ROSA
Petroselinum crispum 89.0 Q84XZ6_PETCR
Nicotiana tabacum 88.5 Q3C254_TOBAC
Solanum lycopersicum 88.2 D7R517_SOLLC
Thellungiella halophile 87.4 E4MW58_THEHA
Brassica napus 87.3 E3US78_BRANA
Arabidopsis thaliana 87.2 MPK4_ARATH
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 86.9 D7M4W5_ARALL
Malus micromalus 86.4 Q8GZR5_MALMI
Medicago sativa 86.3 MMK2_MEDSA
Oryza sativa subsp. Ýndica 83.6 A2Z9P1_ORYSI
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 83.6 MPK6_ORYSJ
Zea mays 83.2 B4FH09_MAIZE
Sorghum bicolor 82.4 C5WUG0_SORBI
Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens 80.9 A9S9Q8_PHYPA
Pinus tadea 78.0 C7ENI4_PINTA
VvMPK14 GSVIVT01038192001 Populus trichocarpa 95.7 B9HGK0_POPTR
Malus domestica 95.2 D1MFM1_MALDO
Pisum sativum 94.8 MAPK_PEA
Ricinus communis 94.5 B9SFT4_RICCO
Medicago sativa 94.2 MMK1_MEDSA
Glycine max 94.2 Q5K6N6_SOYBN
Nicotiana tabacum 93.3 NTF4_TOBAC
Solanum tuberosum 93.0 Q8LT17_SOLTU
Nicotiana benthamiana 93.0 B3IWK6_NICBE
Solanum lycopersicum 93.0 Q84MI5_SOLLC
Capsicum annuum 92.7 Q9LKZ1_CAPAN
Solanum peruvianum 92.7 B5B2H6_SOLPE
Nicotiana attenuate 92.4 A5H2L0_NICAT
Arabidopsis thaliana 91.8 MPK6_ARATH
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 91.8 D7LKI6_ARALL
Brassica napus 91.5 E1B2J5_BRANA
Sorghum bicolor 90.9 C5Z4D1_SORBI
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 90.5 MPK1_ORYSJ
Zea mays 90.5 B8QN51_MAIZE
Oryza sativa subsp. Indica 90.5 B3GCK7_ORYSI
Triticum aestivum 89.9 Q84XZ3_WHEAT
Pinus tadea 87.5 C7ENI3_PINTA
VvMPKK2 GSVIVT01015155001 Populus trichocarpa 81.7 B9IKC3_POPTR
Ricinus communis 81.2 B9RK49_RICCO
Petroselinum crispum 79.3 Q6QMT5_PETCR
Malus domestica 77.6 D1MFM3_MALDO
Nicotiana tabacum 76.8 Q9M6Q9_TOBAC
Solanum lycopersicum 76.3 O48616_SOLLC
Arabidopsis thaliana 75.6 C0Z2L0_ARATH
Glycine max 75.1 Q5JCL0_SOYBN
VvMKK3 GSVIVT01015283001 Ricinus communis 89.0 B9RKG0_RICCO
Solanum lycopersicum 88.7 Q66MH7_SOLLC
Nicotiana tabacum 88.1 Q9AYN9_TOBAC
Nicotiana benthamiana 87.3 B2NIC2_NICBE
Origanum onites 86.1 A7U0S8_9LAMI
Arabidopsis thaliana 83.3 M2K6_ARATH
Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata 83.1 D7MLT9_ARALL
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 77.3 M2K1_ORYSJ
Oryza sativa subsp. Ýndica 77.3 Q0Z7Z4_ORYSI
Zea mays 77.1 O49975_MAIZE
Sorghum bicolor 76.8 C5XIE1_SORBI
VvMKK5 GSVIVT01032414001 Ricinus communis 86.3 B9S641_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 84.6 B9GI57_POPTR
Nicotiana tabacum 82.8 Q40542_TOBAC
Suaeda salsa 79.0 Q8L8I2_SUASA
Arabidopsis thaliana 78.6 O80396_ARATH
VviMAPKKK3 GSVIVT01001193001 Populus trichocarpa 85.5 B9GSK4_POPTR
Ricinus communis 77.8 B9SFH0_RICCO
VviMAPKKK4 GSVIVT01001690001 Populus trichocarpa 82.2 B9GTK7_POPTR
Ricinus communis 80.7 B9T446_RICCO
VviMAPKKK8 GSVIVT01007637001 Populus trichocarpa 80.5 B9I3F6_POPTR
Ricinus communis 79.3 B9RAT5_RICCO
Glycine max 78.7 C0M0P4_SOYBN
Medicago sativa 78.0 Q84RS1_MEDSA
VviMAPKKK9 GSVIVT01007646001 Ricinus communis 88.3 B9RAU4_RICCO
Glycine max 84.7 C6T9D3_SOYBN
Oryza sativa 82.1 B8AEQ7_ORYSI
Zea mays 82.1 C0P3M4_MAIZE
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 82.1 Q6ZH81_ORYSJ
Arabidopsis thaliana 81.8 Q9FGS7_ARATH
VviMAPKKK10 GSVIVT01007762001 Populus trichocarpa 88.0 B9IEQ9_POPTR
Ricinus communis 84.1 B9RB33_RICCO
VviMAPKKK12 GSVIVT01008413001 Populus trichocarpa 80.8 B9IEA9_POPTR
VviMAPKKK17 GSVIVT01012031001 Ricinus communis 79.8 B9S4I8_RICCO
Arabidopsis thaliana 76.9 Q9LJD8_ARATH
VviMAPKKK25 GSVIVT01018020001 Populus trichocarpa 84.0 B9HUS5_POPTR
Ricinus communis 79.4 B9RTM1_RICCO
Arabidopsis thaliana 75.1 Q9LUI6_ARATH
VviMAPKKK29 GSVIVT01019739001 Ricinus communis 76.3 B9RCD5_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 76.0 B9GKG5_POPTR
VviMAPKKK31 GSVIVT01020712001 Ricinus communis 84.0 B9SRD1_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 82.4 B9IA51_POPTR
VviMAPKKK34 GSVIVT01022098001 Populus trichocarpa 82.7 B9HHA4_POPTR
VviMAPKKK40 GSVIVT01023958001 Populus trichocarpa 82.2 B9H1M1_POPTR
Ricinus communis 79.8 B9S5G6_RICCO
VviMAPKKK42 GSVIVT01026487001 Ricinus communis 77.0 B9SUR2_RICCO
VviMAPKKK45 GSVIVT01028897001 Ricinus communis 83.2 B9RIV9_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 82.9 B9IDA8_POPTR
VviMAPKKK50 GSVIVT01030194001 Ricinus communis 85.4 B9T3P6_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 84.3 B9IGR7_POPTR
Medicago truncatula 84.0 B7FKS6_MEDTR
Glycine max 81.6 C6TMB8_SOYBN
Arabidopsis thaliana 80.9 Q8L6Y9_ARATH
VviMAPKKK54 GSVIVT01032389001 Populus trichocarpa 91.2 B9GI75_POPTR
Ricinus communis 89.5 B9S662_RICCO
Cucumis sativus 82.4 Q7XJ65_CUCSA
Arabidopsis thaliana 81.3 Q9LT56_ARATH
VviMAPKKK55 GSVIVT01032487001 Populus trichocarpa 89.2 B9IJN5_POPTR
Ricinus communis 88.0 B9RB44_RICCO
Arabidopsis thaliana 86.9 Q9SSA4_ARATH
Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica 84.6 Q6L5F3_ORYSJ
Oryza sativa subsp. Indica 84.6 A2Y7U2_ORYSI
Zea mays 83.3 B6U656_MAIZE
VviMAPKKK56 GSVIVT01033779001 Populus trichocarpa 80.9 B9IFS3_POPTR
Prunus salinica 79.8 A9UAN3_9ROSA
Ricinus communis 79.8 B9SRG7_RICCO
Prunus persica 78.9 C4PKQ3_PRUPE
Rosa hybrid cultivar 78.6 Q93XL9_ROSHC
Malus domestica 78.5 A2T3V2_MALDO
Solanum lycopersicum 77.1 Q5YKK5_SOLLC
VviMAPKKK58 GSVIVT01034988001 Ricinus communis 78.3 B9RZR2_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 78.0 B9HIN4_POPTR
VviMAPKKK61 GSVIVT01037773001 Ricinus communis 80.4 B9SSS7_RICCO
Gossypium hirsutum 79.5 Q7Y236_GOSHI
Arabidopsis thaliana 76.8 WNK11_ARATH
VvMAP4K3 GSVIVT01014297001 Ricinus communis 76.6 B9T3W4_RICCO
Populus trichocarpa 76.1 B9N1E7_POPTR
VvMAP4K5 GSVIVT01019643001 Populus trichocarpa 79.8 B9GK86_POPTR
Ricinus communis 79.3 B9RYT1_RICCO
VvMAP4K7 GSVIVT01032461001 Populus trichocarpa 80.0 B9GHQ7_POPTR
Carica papaya 79.0 A7L4B0_CARPA
Arabidopsis thaliana 75.6 Q9LER4_ARATH

Columns 1–4 contain the protein name, Vitis proteome 12× ID, GenBank ID, species, percentage identity (%ID), UniprotKB ID.

All of the 14 Vitis MAPK proteins are represented in the Vitis ESTs database (Supplementary Table 1) and are expressed in different tissues such as fruits, berries, buds, flowers, leaves, and roots. In addition, 12 VvMPK genes were isolated (Wang et al., 2014a). Expression analysis of VvMPK genes showed that all VvMPK genes are expressed during grapevine growth and development, and in biotic and abiotic stresses (Wang et al., 2014a).

MAPKKs

This subfamily consists of 10 members in Arabidopsis genome (Group et al., 2002), whereas Vitis genome contains 5 members of MAPKK subfamily. The full length VvMKK sequences range in size from 224 to 519 amino acids (Table 1). The members of the MAPKK subfamily in the Vitis genome share 29–40% similarity with each other. By phylogenetic analysis, we also identified orthologs of Vitis MAPKKs in Arabidopsis such as VvMKK5/AtMKK3 (78.6% similarity), VvMKK3/AtMKK6 (83.1% similarity), and VvMKK2/AtMKK2 (70.4% similarity) supported with significant bootstrap values. The phylogenetic analysis confirmed that VvMKK3 shares 83.3% similarity with its homolog from Arabidopsis on the basis of orthology analysis, (Figure 3, Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of MAPKK protein sequences from Arabidopsis and Vitis vinifera. The amino acid sequences of all Arabidopsis MAPKK proteins and those of Vitis vinifera were aligned using the MUSCLE program and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by the distance with neighborjoining method using MEGA5 programme. Accession numbers for Arabidopsis sequences are AtMKK1 (At4g26070), AtMKK2 (At4g29810), AtMKK3 (At5g40440), AtMKK4 (At1g51660), AtMKK5 (At3g21220), AtMKK 6 (At5g56580), AtMKK7 (At1g18350), AtMKK8 (At3g06230), AtMKK9 (At1g73500), AtMKK10 (At1g32320).

To date, none of the Vitis MAPKK homologs have been cloned or characterized. However, 98 ESTs were identified for this subfamily in different tissues in response to biotic or abiotic stresses (Supplementary Table 2). A role of MAPK kinase, MKK1 in abiotic stress signaling was previously demonstrated (Matsuoka et al., 2002). Analysis of MKK1 revealed that drought, salt stress, cold, wounding activated MKK1, which in turns activates its downstream target MPK4 (Matsuoka et al., 2002). Tobacco NtMEK2 is functionally interchangeable with two Arabidopsis MAPKKs, AtMKK4, and AtMKK5 in activating the downstream MAPKs (Ren et al., 2002). MdMKK1 was reported to be downregulated by ABA (Wang et al., 2010). In Arabidopsis, AtMKK3 is upregulated in response to ABA (Hwa and Yang, 2008). Interestingly, AtMKK1/AtMKK2 play an important role in signaling in ROS homeostasis (Liu, 2012).

MAPKKKs

With 62 members, the MAPKKK subfamily represents the largest subfamily of V. vinifera MAPK cascade proteins, which is smaller than those of Arabidopsis (80 members) and rice (75 members) (Colcombet and Hirt, 2008; Rao et al., 2010). Recently, Wang et al. (2014b) identified 45 MAPKKK genes in grapevine 12x genome coverage (Wang et al., 2014b). The difference in the number of MAPKKK members in grapevine genome may be related to the “E” value > E-120 used in this report, which is more significant. In addition, domain scan using two different databases (PROSITE and CDD) can identify more sequences in the grapevine genome.

The members of the Vitis MAPKKK subfamily share 11–35% identity with each other and distributed on various chromosomes (from 2 to 18) (Table 1). The full length Vitis MAPKKK sequences range from 175 (VviMAPKKK38) to 1397 (VviMAPKKK17) amino acids. The phylogenetic analysis of both Vitis and Arabidopsis MAPKKK sequences shows that this subfamily is categorized into three main groups with bootstrap values up to 93% (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Phylogenetic tree of MAPKKK protein sequences from Arabidopsis and Vitis vinifera. The amino acid sequences of all Arabidopsis MAPKKK proteins and those of Vitis vinifera were aligned using the MUSCLE program and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by the distance with neighborjoining method using MEGA5 programme. MAPKKK forms the largest group of MAPK cascades with 62 members classified into three subfamilies, MEKK, Raf, and ZIK containing 21, 29, and 12 genes, recpectively in Vitis genome. Accession numbers for Arabidopsis sequences are AtMEKK1 (At1g09000), AtMEKK2 (At1g54960), AtMEKK3 (At1g53570), AtMEKK4 (At1g63700), AtMEKK5 (At5g66850), AtMEKK6 (At3g07980), AtMEKK7 (At3g13530), AtMEKK8 (At4g08500), AtMEKK9 (At4g08480), AtMEKK10 (At4g08470), AtMEKK11 (At4g12020), AtMEKK12 (At3g06030), AtMEKK13 (At1g07150), AtMEKK14 (At2g30040), AtMEKK15 (At5g55090), AtMEKK16 (At4g26890), AtMEKK17 (At2g32510), AtMEKK18 (At1g05100), AtMEKK19 (At5g67080), AtMEKK20 (At3g50310), AtMEKK21 (At4g36950), AtRAF1 (At5g03730), AtRAF2 (At1g08720), AtRAF3 (At5g11850), AtRAF4 (At1g18160), AtRAF5 (At1g73660), AtRAF6 (At4g24480), AtRAF7 (At3g06620), AtRAF8 (At3g06630), AtRAF9 (At3g06640), AtRAF10 (At5g49470), AtRAF11 (At1g67890), AtRAF12 (At4g23050), AtRAF13 (At2g31010), AtRAF14 (At2g42630), AtRAF15 (At3g58640), AtRAF16 (At1g04700), AtRAF17 (At1g14000), AtRAF18 (At1g16270), AtRAF19 (At1g62400), AtRAF20 (At1g79570), AtRAF21 (At2g17700), AtRAF22 (At2g24360), AtRAF23 (At2g31800), AtRAF24 (At2g35050), AtRAF25 (At2g43850), AtRAF26 (At4g14780), AtRAF27 (At4g18950), AtRAF28 (At4g31170), AtRAF29 (At4g35780), AtRAF30 (At4g38470), AtRAF31 (At5g01850), AtRAF32 (At5g40540), AtRAF33 (At5g50000), AtRAF34 (At5g50180), AtRAF35 (At5g57610), AtRAF36 (At5g58950), AtRAF37 (At5g66710), AtRAF38 (At3g01490), AtRAF39 (At3g22750), AtRAF40 (At3g24720), AtRAF41 (At3g27560), AtRAF42 (At3g46920), AtRAF43 (At3g46930), AtRAF44 (At3g50720), AtRAF45 (At3g50730), AtRAF46 (At3g59830), AtRAF47 (At3g58760), AtRAF48 (At3g63260), AtZIK1 (At3g51630), AtZIK2 (At5g58350), AtZIK3 (At3g22420), AtZIK4 (At3g04910), AtZIK5 (At3g18750), AtZIK6 (At5g41990), AtZIK7 (At1g49160), AtZIK8 (At5g55560), AtZIK9 (At5g28080), AtZIK10 (At1g64630), AtZIK11 (At3g48260).

The first group contains MAPKKKs whose kinase domains have similarity to MEKK subfamily members (Figure 4) (Jonak et al., 2002). A second group includes Raf subfamily members while a third group presents ZIK subfamily members (Figure 4) (Jonak et al., 2002). In total, there are 21 VviMAPKKKs in the MEKK subfamily, while there are 12 in the ZIK subfamily and 29 in the Raf subfamily among the 62 members in the Vitis genome.

Analysis of conserved domain of VviMAPKKKs identified a long regulatory domain in the N-terminal region and a kinase domain in the C-terminal region in most of VviMAPKKKs. It is suggested that the long regulatory domain in the N-terminal region of the Raf subfamily may be involved in protein-protein interactions and regulate or specify their kinase activity (Jouannic et al., 1999). Twenty members of the Vitis MAPKKK subfamily share 75.1–89.2% similarity with their orthologs from different plant species (Table 2).

We identified at least 640 ESTs for 59 of the Vitis MAPKKKs (Supplementary Table 3) indicating that MAPKKK subfamily is transcriptionally active. Expression profile of VviMAPKKK genes suggested that some of them are involved in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in different tissues and organs (Wang et al., 2014b). In support of a role for some Vitis MAPKKKs, AtMEKK1 expression is enhanced by drought, salt, stress (Mizoguchi et al., 1996). Recently, it was reported that AtMKK1/MKK2 and AtMEKK1 were able to negatively regulate programmed cell death (PCD) as well as immune responses (Kong et al., 2012). In tobacco, NPK1-MEK1-Ntf6 are also involved in resistance to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (Jin et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2004). In addition, AtEDR1, a Raf-like MAPKKK could regulate SA-inducible defense responses negatively (Frye et al., 2001).

MAPKKKKs

In non-plants, MAPKKKs are activated either through phosphorylation by MAPKKK kinase (MAPKKKK or MAP4K) (Posas and Saito, 1997; Sells et al., 1997) or by G protein and G protein-coupled receptors (Fanger et al., 1997; Sugden and Clerk, 1997).

Several MAP4Ks have been identified in plant genomes based on phylogenetic analyses of their kinase domain. A MAP4K, named MIK, was characterized from the Zea mays (Wang et al., 2014d). Recently, a new MAP4K from GCK-II subfamily named ScMAP4K1, which play important roles in ovule, seed, and fruit development was characterized (Major et al., 2009).

In fully sequenced genomes, like Arabidopsis and rice at least 10 protein kinases can be phylogenetically classified as MAP4K (Champion et al., 2004). Little is known about the roles of MAP4Ks in plants. Seven ORFs showing strong similarity with the 10 Arabidopsis MAP4Ks were identified in Vitis genome (Figure 5) and shared 18–74% similarity with each other. They have been named VvMAP4K1 through 7 (Table 1). The phylogenetic analysis of V. vinifera and A. thaliana MAP4Ks proteins identified several orthologs in the two species such as VvMAP4K4/AtMAP4K8 (70% similarity), VvMAP4K1/AtMAP4K3 (66% similarity), VvMAP4K7/AtMAP4K4 (68% similarity), and VvMAP4K6/AtMAP4K10 (64% similarity) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree of MAPKKKK protein sequences from Arabidopsis and Vitis vinifera. The amino acid sequences of all Arabidopsis MAPKKKK proteins and those of Vitis vinifera were aligned using the MUSCLE program and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by the distance with neighborjoining method using MEGA5 programme. Accession numbers for Arabidopsis sequences are AtMAP4K1 (At1g53165), AtMAP4K2 (At3g15220), AtMAP4K3 (At1g69220), AtMAP4K4 (At5g14720), AtMAP4K5 (At4g24100), AtMAP4K6 (At4g10730), AtMAP4K7 (At1g70430), AtMAP4K8 (At1g79640), AtMAP4K9 (At1g23700), AtMAP4K10 (At4g14480).

In addition, we identified several orthologs from different species for 3 VvMAP4Ks (Table 2). Among 7 ORFs encoding Vitis MAP4Ks, all of them are transcriptionally active (Supplementary Table 4), but none of them has been cloned and characterized.

Conclusions

This report represents the first complete genome-wide analysis of MAPK cascade proteins in grapevine. The identification of Vitis MAPK cascade proteins and their comparative analysis with the Arabidopsis MAPK cascade proteins indicates that MAPK cascade genes have been conserved during evolution. In this report, we annotated 90 ORFs encoding MAPK cascade proteins in V. vinifera using a bioinformatics approach. Taken as a whole, our data provide significant insights into future biological and physiological analysis of MAPK cascades from V. vinifera.

Author contributions

BÇ conceived and designed all research. OK performed the bioinformatic analyses. BÇ analyzed data and wrote the article.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Department of Horticulture, Ege University, Turkey.

Glossary

Abbreviations

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

ORF

open reading frame.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00556

References

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asai T., Tena G., Plotnikova J., Willmann M. R., Chiu W. L., Gomez-Gomez L., et al. (2002). MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 415, 977–983. 10.1038/415977a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergmann D. C., Lukowitz W., Somerville C. R. (2004). Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science 304, 1494–1497. 10.1126/science.1096014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bögre L., Calderini O., Binarova P., Mattauch M., Till S., Kiegerl S., et al. (1999). A MAP kinase is cctivated late in plant mitosis and becomes localized to the plane of cell division. Plant Cell 11, 101–113. 10.1105/tpc.11.1.101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bush S. M., Krysan P. J. (2007). Mutational evidence that the Arabidopsis MAP kinase MPK6 is involved in anther, inflorescence, and embryo development. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 2181–2191. 10.1093/jxb/erm092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Çakır B., Kılıçkaya O. (2013). Whole-genome survey of the putative ATP-binding cassette transporter family genes in Vitis vinifera. PLoS ONE 8:e78860. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardinale F., Meskiene I., Ouaked F., Hirt H. (2002). Convergence and divergence of stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways at the level of two distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases. Plant Cell 14, 703–711. 10.1105/tpc.010256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Champion A., Picaud A., Henry Y. (2004). Reassessing the MAP3K and MAP4K relationships. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 123–129. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colcombet J., Hirt H. (2008). Arabidopsis MAPKs: a complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J. 413, 217–226. 10.1042/BJ20080625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daldoul S., Hoefer M. II, Mliki, A. (2012). Osmotic Stress Induces the Expression of VvMAP Kinase Gene in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Bot. 11, 1–4. 10.1155/2012/737035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dan I., Watanabe N. M., Kusumi A. (2001). The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 220–230. 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)01980-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Datta R. S., Meacham C., Samad B., Neyer C., Sjolander K. (2009). Berkeley PHOG: PhyloFacts orthology group prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W84–W89. 10.1093/nar/gkp373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. del Pozo O., Pedley K. F., Martin G. B. (2004). MAPKKKα is a positive regulator of cell death associated with both plant immunity and disease. EMBO J. 23, 3072–3082. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edgar R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fanger G. R., Johnson N. L., Johnson G. L. (1997). MEK kinases are regulated by EGF and selectively interact with Rac/Cdc42. Embo J. 16, 4961–4972. 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feilner T., Hultschig C., Lee J., Meyer S., Immink R. G. H., Koenig A., et al. (2005). High throughput identification of potential Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinases substrates. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1558–1568. 10.1074/mcp.M500007-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiil B. K., Petersen K., Petersen M., Mundy J. (2009). Gene regulation by MAP kinase cascades. Cur. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 615–621. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frye C. A., Tang D., Innes R. W. (2001). Negative regulation of defense responses in plants by a conserved MAPKK kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 373–378. 10.1073/pnas.98.1.373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Galletti R., Ferrari S., De Lorenzo G. (2011). Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 play different roles in basal and oligogalacturonide- or flagellin-induced resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 157, 804–814. 10.1104/pp.111.174003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gray J. E., Hetherington A. M. (2004). Plant development: YODA the stomatal switch. Curr. Biol. 14, R488–R490. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Group M., Ichimura K., Shinozaki K., Tena G., Sheen J., Henry Y., Champion A., et al. (2002). Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 301–308. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02302-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamel L. P., Nicole M. C., Sritubtim S., Morency M. J., Ellis M., Ehlting J., et al. (2006). Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 192–198. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang X., Luo T., Fu X., Fan Q., Liu J. (2011). Cloning and molecular characterization of a mitogen-activated protein kinase gene from Poncirus trifoliata whose ectopic expression confers dehydration/drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 5191–5206. 10.1093/jxb/err229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huttly A. K., Phillips A. L. (1995). Gibberellin-regulated expression in oat aleurone cells of two kinases that show homology to MAP kinase and a ribosomal protein kinase. Plant Mol. Biol. 27, 1043–1052. 10.1007/bf00037031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hwa C.-M., Yang X.-C. (2008). The AtMKK3 pathway mediates ABA and salt signaling in Arabidopsis. Acta Physiol. Plantarum 30, 277–286. 10.1007/s11738-007-0117-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyun T. K., Kim J. S., Kwon S. Y., Kim S. H. (2010). Comparative genomic analysis of mitogen activated protein kinase gene family in grapevine. Genes Genomics 32, 275–281. 10.1007/s13258-010-0010-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ichimura K., Mizoguchi T., Irie K., Morris P., Giraudat J., Matsumoto K., et al. (1998). Isolation of ATMEKK1 (a MAP kinase kinase kinase)-interacting proteins and analysis of a MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253, 532–543. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ichimura K., Mizoguchi T., Yoshida R., Yuasa T., Shinozaki K. (2000). Various abiotic stresses rapidly activate Arabidopsis MAP kinases ATMPK4 and ATMPK6. Plant J. 24, 655–665. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00913.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ichimura K., Shinozaki K., Tena G., Sheen J., Henry Y., Champion A., et al. (2002). Mapk G: Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 301–308. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02302-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaillon O., Aury J. M., Noel B., Policriti A., Clepet C., Casagrande A., et al. (2007). The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463–467. 10.1038/nature06148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jin H., Axtell M. J., Dahlbeck D., Ekwenna O., Zhang S., Staskawicz B., et al. (2002). NPK1, and MEKK1-like mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase, regulates innate immunity and development in plants. Dev. Cell 3, 291–297. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00205-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jonak C., Ökrész L., Bögre L., Hirt H. (2002). Complexity, Cross Talk and Integration of Plant MAP Kinase Signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5, 415–424. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00285-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jonak C., Pay A., Bogre L., Hirt H., Heberle-Bors E. (1993). The plant homologue of MAP kinase is expressed in a cell cycle-dependent and organ-specific manner. Plant J. 3, 611–617. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.03040611.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jouannic S., Hamal A., Leprince A. S., Tregear J. W., Kreis M., Henry Y. (1999). Characterisation of novel plant genes encoding MEKK/STE11 and RAF-related protein kinases. Gene 229, 171–181. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00012-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Katou S., Yoshioka H., Kawakita K., Rowland O., Jones J. D., Mori H., et al. (2005). Involvement of PPS3 phosphorylated by elicitor-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in the regulation of plant cell death. Plant Physiol. 139, 1914–1926. 10.1104/pp.105.066795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kieber J. J., Rothenberg M., Roman G., Feldmann K. A., Ecker J. R. (1993). CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the raf family of protein kinases. Cell 72, 427–441. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90119-B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kiegerl S., Cardinale F., Siligan C., Gross A., Baudouin E., Liwosz A., et al. (2000). SIMKK, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase, is a specific activator of the salt stress-induced MAPK, SIMK. Plant Cell 12, 2247–2258. 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kishi-Kaboshi M., Okada K., Kurimoto L., Murakami S., Umezawa T., Shibuya N., et al. (2010). A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synthesis. Plant J. 63, 599–612. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04264.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Knetsch M. L. W., Wang M., Snaar-Jagalska B. E., Heimovaara-Dijkstra S. (1996). Abscisic acid induces mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in barley aleuron protoplasts. Plant Cell 8, 1061–1067. 10.1105/tpc.8.6.1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kong Q., Qu N., Gao M., Zhang Z., Ding X., Yang F., et al. (2012). The MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 kinase cascade negatively regulates immunity mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 2225–2236. 10.1105/tpc.112.097253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kovtun Y., Chiu W. L., Tena G., Sheen J. (2000). Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 2940–2945. 10.1073/pnas.97.6.2940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kumar K., Rao K. P., Biswas D. K., Sinha A. K. (2011). Rice WNK1 is regulated by abiotic stress and involved in internal circadian rhythm. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 316–320. 10.4161/psb.6.3.13063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumar K. R., Kirti P. B. (2010). A mitogen-activated protein kinase, AhMPK6 from peanut localizes to the nucleus and also induces defense responses upon transient expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 481–486. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee J., Rudd J. J., Macioszek V. K., Scheel D. (2004). Dynamic changes in the localization of MAPK cascade components controlling pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression during innate immunity in parsley. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 22440–22448. 10.1074/jbc.M401099200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leprince A., Jouannic S., Hamal A., Kreis M., Henry Y. (1999). Molecular characterisation of plant cDNAs BnMAP4K alpha 1 and BnMAP4K alpha 2 belonging to the GCK/SPS1 subfamily of MAP kinase kinase kinase kinase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1444, 1–13. 10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00246-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu Q., Xue Q. (2007). Computational identification and phylogenetic analysis of the MAPK gene family in Oryza sativa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45, 6–14. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu Y. (2012). Roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in ABA signaling. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 1–12. 10.1007/s00299-011-1130-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu Y., Schiff M., Dinesh-Kumar S. P. (2004). Involvement of MEK1 MAPKK, NTF6 MAPK, WRKY/MYB transcription factors, COI1 and CTR1 in N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 38, 800–809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02085.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Llompart B., Castells E., Río A., Roca R., Ferrando A., Stiefel V., et al. (2003). The direct activation of MIK, a germinal center kinase (GCK)-like kinase, by MARK, a maize atypical receptor kinase, suggests a new mechanism for signaling through kinase-dead receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 28, 48105–48111. 10.1074/jbc.M307482200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lukowitz W., Roeder A., Parmenter D., Somerville C. (2004). A MAPKK kinase gene regulates extra-embryonic cell fate in Arabidopsis. Cell 116, 109–119. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01067-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lynch M., O'Hely M., Walsh B., Force A. (2001). The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159, 1789–1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Major G., Daigle C., Lafleur E., Caron S., Matton D. (2009). Characterization of ScMAP4K1, a MAP kinase kinase kinase kinase involved in ovule, seed and fruit development in Solanum chacoense Bitt. Curr. Topics Plant Biol. 10, 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  53. Marchler-Bauer A., Anderson J. B., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M. K., DeWeese-Scott C., Fong J. H., et al. (2009). CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D205–D210. 10.1093/nar/gkn845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Matsuoka D., Nanmori T., Sato K., Fukami Y., Kikkawa U., Yasuda T. (2002). Activation of AtMEK1, an Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, in vitro and in vivo: analysis of active mutants expressed in E. coli and generation of the active form in stress response in seedlings. Plant J. 29, 637–647. 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01246.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Melech-Bonfil S., Sessa G. (2010). Tomato MAPKKKepsilon is a positive regulator of cell-death signaling networks associated with plant immunity. Plant J. 64, 379–391. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04333.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meng X., Wang H., He Y., Liu Y., Walker J. C., Torii K. U., et al. (2012). A MAPK cascade downstream of ERECTA receptor-like protein kinase regulates Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture by promoting localized cell proliferation. Plant Cell 24, 4948–4960. 10.1105/tpc.112.104695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mizoguchi T., Ichimura K., Irie K., Morris P., Giraudat J., Matsumoto K., et al. (1998). Identification of a possible MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis thaliana based on pairwise yeast two-hybrid analysis and functional complementation tests of yeast mutants. FEBS Lett. 437, 56–60. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01197-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mizoguchi T., Irie K., Hirayama T., Hayashida N., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Matsumoto K., et al. (1996). A gene encoding a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is induced simultaneously with genes for a mitogen-activated protein kinase and an S6 ribosomal protein kinase by touch, cold, and water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 765–769. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Moreno-Hagelsieb G., Latimer K. (2008). Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits. Bioinformatics 24, 319–324. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nadarajah K., Sidek H. (2010). The green MAPKS. Asian J. Plant Sci. 9, 1–10. 10.3923/ajps.2010.1.10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nakagami H., Kiegerl S., Hirt H. (2004). OMTK1, a novel MAPKKK, channels oxidative stress signaling through direct MAPK interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 26959–26966. 10.1074/jbc.M312662200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ning J., Li X., Hicks L. M., Xiong L. (2010). A raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 152, 876–890. 10.1104/pp.109.149856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nishihama R., Ishikawa M., Araki S., Soyano T., Asada T., Machida Y. (2001). The NPK1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is a regulator of cell-plate formation in plant cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 15, 352–363. 10.1101/gad.863701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nowak M. A., Boerlijst M. C., Cooke J., Smith J. M. (1997). Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature 388, 167–171. 10.1038/40618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Oh C.-S., Pedley K. F., Martin G. B. (2010). Tomato 14-3-3 protein 7 positively regulates immunity-associated programmed cell death by enhancing protein abundance and signaling ability of MAPKKKα. Plant Cell 22, 260–272. 10.1105/tpc.109.070664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ortiz-Masia D., Perez-Amador M. A., Carbonell J., Marcote M. J. (2007). Diverse stress signals activate the C1 subgroup MAP kinases of Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 581, 1834–1840. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pedley K. F., Martin G. B. (2005). Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 541–547. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Posas F., Saito H. (1997). Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: Scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. Science 276, 1702–1705. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Qi M., Elion E. A. (2005). MAP kinase pathways. J. Cell Sci. 118, 3569–3572. 10.1242/jcs.02470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Qiu J. L., Fiil B. K., Petersen K., Nielsen H. B., Botanga C. J., Thorgrimsen S., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates gene expression through transcription factor release in the nucleus. Embo J. 27, 2214–2221. 10.1038/emboj.2008.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rao K. P., Richa T., Kumar K., Raghuram B., Sinha A. K. (2010). In silico analysis reveals 75 members of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in rice. DNA Res. 17, 139–153. 10.1093/dnares/dsq011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ren D., Yang H., Zhang S. (2002). Cell death mediated by MAPK is associated with hydrogen peroxide production in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 559–565. 10.1074/jbc.M109495200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rodriguez M., Petersen M., Mundy J. (2010). Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 161, 621–649. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rohila J. S., Yang Y. (2007). Rice Mitogen-activated protein kinase gene family and its role in biotic and abiotic stress response. J. Integr Plant Biol. 49, 751–759. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00501.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Saitou N., Nei M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sells M. A., Knaus U. G., Bagrodia S., Ambrose D. M., Bokoch G. M., Chernoff J. (1997). Human p21-activated kinase (Pak1) regulates actin organization in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 202–210. 10.1016/S0960-9822(97)70091-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Song F., Goodman R. M. (2002). OsBIMK1, a rice MAP kinase gene involved in disease resistance responses. Planta 215, 997–1005. 10.1007/s00425-002-0794-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Stulemeijer I. J. E., Stratmann J. W., Joosten M. H. A. J. (2007). Tomato mitogen-activated protein kinases LeMPK1, LeMPK2, and LeMPK3 are activated during the Cf-4/Avr4-Induced hypersensitive response and have distinct phosphorylation specificities. Plant Physiol. 144, 1481–1494. 10.1104/pp.107.101063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sugden P. H., Clerk A. (1997). Regulation of the ERK subgroup of MAP kinase cascades through G protein-coupled receptors. Cell Signal. 9, 337–351. 10.1016/S0898-6568(96)00191-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sun Y., Wang C., Yang B., Wu F., Hao X., Liang W., et al. (2014). Identification and functional analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) genes in canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Exp. Bot. 65, 2171–2188. 10.1093/jxb/eru092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Teige M., Scheikl E., Eulgem T., Doczi R., Ichimura K., Shinozaki K., et al. (2004). The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 15, 141–152. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wang G., Lovato A., Liang Y. H., Wang M., Chen F., Tornielli G. B., et al. (2014a). Validation by isolation and expression analyses of MAPK gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 20, 255–262. 10.1111/ajgw.12081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang G., Lovato A., Polverari A., Wang M., Liang Y. H., Ma Y. C., et al. (2014b) Genome-wide identification and analysis of mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). BMC Plant Biol. 14:219 10.1186/s12870-014-0219-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang J., Pan C., Wang Y., Ye L., Wu J., Chen L., et al. (2015). Genome-wide identification of MAPK, MAPKK, and MAPKKK gene families and transcriptional profiling analysis during development and stress response in cucumber. BMC Genomics 16:386. 10.1186/s12864-015-1621-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang L., Liu Y., Cai G., Jiang S., Pan J., Li D. (2014d). Ectopic expression of ZmSIMK1 leads to improved drought tolerance and activation of systematic acquired resistance in transgenic tobacco. J. Biotechnol. 20, 18–29. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang L., Su H., Han L., Wang C., Sun Y., Liu F. (2014c). Differential expression profiles of poplar MAP kinase kinases in response to abiotic stresses and plant hormones, and overexpression of PtMKK4 improves the drought tolerance of poplar. Gene. 15, 141–148. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.04.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang X. J., Zhu S. Y., Lu Y. F., Zhao R., Xin Q., Wang X. F., et al. (2010). Two coupled components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade MdMPK1 and MdMKK1 from apple function in ABA signal transduction. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 754–766. 10.1093/pcp/pcq037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang Y., Liu K., Liao H., Zhuang C., Ma H., Yan X. (2008). The plant WNK gene family and regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 10, 548–562. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00072.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wilson C., Voronin V., Touraev A., Vicente O., Heberle-Bors E. (1997). A developmentally regulated MAP kinase activated by hydration in tobacco pollen. Plant Cell 9, 2093–2100. 10.1105/tpc.9.11.2093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yang K.-Y., Liu Y., Zhang S. (2001). Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 741–746. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yuasa T., Ichimura K., Mizoguchi T., Shinozaki K. (2001). Oxidative stress activates ATMPK6, an Arabidopsis homologue of MAP kinase. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 1012–1016. 10.1093/pcp/pce123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zaïdi I., Ebel C., Touzri M., Herzog E., Evrard J.-L., Schmit A., et al. (2010). TMKP1 is a novel wheat stress responsive MAP kinase phosphatase localized in the nucleus. Plant Mol. Biol. 73, 325–338. 10.1007/s11103-010-9617-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhang S., Klessig D. F. (1997). Salicylic acid activates a 48-kD MAP kinase in tobacco. Plant Cell 9, 809–824. 10.1105/tpc.9.5.809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang S., Klessig D. F. (2001). MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 520–527. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02103-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES