Abstract
Purpose of review
Intestinal fibrosis is a serious, yet common, outcome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite advances in developing novel treatment modalities to control chronic gut inflammation characteristic of IBD, no effective anti-fibrotic therapies exist to date. As such, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying intestinal fibrosis and the availability of relevant animal models are critical to move this area of investigation forward.
Recent findings
Emerging concepts in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis include the central role of interleukin (IL)-17 and Th17 immune responses, although their precise contribution to chronic inflammation and IBD remains controversial. Other novel mediators of intestinal fibrosis, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like ligand 1A (TL1A) and components of the renin-angiotensin system, support the importance of IL-17. Additionally, recent studies utilizing novel mouse models highlight the significance of the gut microbiota and link components of bacterial sensing, including nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), to IL-17/Th17 immune responses in the development of inflammation-associated intestinal fibrosis.
Summary
Recent progress in identifying key mediators, novel animal models, and important mechanistic pathways in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis hold promise for the development of effective anti-fibrotics in an area of significant, unmet clinical need.
Keywords: Intestinal fibrosis, IL-17, TL1A, renin-angiotensin system, SAMP1/YitFc model
Introduction
Intestinal fibrosis is a common outcome in patients with IBD that results in progressive tissue architectural distortion, loss of function, luminal narrowing, and is a major cause of morbidity. Over a third of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) will undergo at least one surgical procedure, and many will require recurrent resections; currently, there are no effective anti-fibrotic therapies in IBD (1). The fundamental principle underlying fibrosis is the imbalance between extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and degradation, wherein excessive deposition coincides with decreased degradation, commonly by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and its regulator, tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs). Chronic inflammation is tightly linked to intestinal fibrosis, wherein the current dogma focuses on upstream profibrogenic Th2 immune responses. Th2 cells are important against extracellular parasites and produce IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 (2); of these, IL-13 is most strongly implicated in fibrogenesis (3). IL-13-producing lymphoid cells are abundant in intestinal strictures of CD patients and inhibit fibroblast MMP synthesis, leading to excess ECM deposition and fibrosis (4). IL-13 also induces transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) (5), which is a potent profibrogenic molecule and key mediator in many fibrotic diseases, including IBD. TGFβ1 induces activation and proliferation of profibrogenic cells, such as intestinal myofibroblasts, and stimulates ECM production (6).
One of the major difficulties investigating the underlying etiology of intestinal fibrosis is the relatively late presentation of clinical signs and symptoms. By the time patients become symptomatic, fibrosis is generally well-advanced, limiting the ability to study critical, early changes that drive fibrogenesis. Therefore, animal models are important tools to perform mechanistic studies to investigate the initiation and progression of disease. Numerous animal models of gut fibrosis have been proposed (Table I), but many are limited in the extent and distribution of fibrosis and/or have little relevance to the human condition.
Table I.
Animal models of gut fibrosis.
| CATEGORY | MODEL | MODE OF ADMINISTRATION/OUTCOME |
|---|---|---|
| Chemically-Induced | DSS | Administered in drinking water, causing epithelial damage and permeabilization of the colonic mucosa with subsequent acute inflammation; cycling of DSS causes chronic inflammation and ensuing fibrosis |
| TNBS | Colonic enema administration of TNBS/ethanol damages epithelial barrier and causes a T cell-dependent transmural inflammation; long-term administration results in colonic fibrosis | |
| Microbial | PG-PS | Injection directly into the cecal or small bowel wall induces granulomatous enterocolitis with significant fibrosis |
| Fecal injection | Injection of fecal suspension directly into the bowel wall of colon causes aggressive colitis and transmural fibrosis | |
| Chronic Salmonella infection | Oral administration after pre-treatment with streptomycin causes colonic mucosal and transmural inflammation with significant fibrosis | |
| AIEC infection | Gavage of the human CD isolate of AIEC, NRG857, after pre-treatment with streptomycin causes ileo-colonic inflammation and Th1- and Th17-mediated and fibrosis | |
| Genetically-Manipulated Mice | TGFβ1-Tg TβRIIΔk-fib-Tg | Enema administration of these adenoviral vectors overexpressing TGFβ into the colon leads to acute and chronic inflammation, ECM deposition and thickening of muscularis layers |
| MCP-1-Tg | Intramural injection of adenoviral vector carrying MCP-1 in the rectum leads to transmural inflammation, collagen deposition, and fibrosis | |
| IL-10 deficient | Genetic deletion of IL-10 results in transmural inflammatory lesions of the colon, crypt abscesses, and thickening of the bowel wall; evidence of increased susceptibility to developing post-surgical fibrosis in small intestines after ileo-cecal resection | |
| Immune-Mediated | T cell transfer | Transfer of donor CD4+/CD45RBhigh T cells into immunodeficient recipient mice results in wasting disease, colitis and mild fibrosis |
| Spontaneous | SAMP1/YitFc mouse strain | Develops spontaneous terminal ileitis and subsequent fibrosis |
dextran sodium sulphate (DSS); trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS); peptidoglycan-polysaccharide (PG-PS); Adherent invasive E. Coli (AIEC); macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
In this review, we will discuss recent studies that expand current paradigms in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrogenesis, incorporating alternative immune pathways, such as Th17 responses, interactions with the gut microbiome, and highlight novel mouse models that integrate these concepts.
IL-17 and associated mediators
Th17 cells define a subset of T helper cells that mainly produce IL-17A, but also IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-22, and are increasingly recognized as paramount in several chronic inflammatory disorders, including IBD (7). IL-17A has been implicated in fibrosis in multiple organs, including lung (8), liver (9), and heart (10); recent studies also support its role in the intestine, linking IL-17/Th17 immune responses and other associated mediators in the pathogenesis of gut fibrosis.
IL-17
In recent years, the precise role of IL-17/Th17 in IBD has been controversial, with dichotomous reports promoting both IL-17-dependent inflammation and protection. Early evidence for a proinflammatory role include findings that IL-23 via IL-17A is an important pathway in T cell-mediated colitis (11), and that IL-17A is upregulated in the inflamed mucosa of CD patients (12). In addition, patients with active CD have high fecal IL-17A content and increased numbers of IL-17A-producing cells within the lamina propria (13). Conversely, IL-17A appears to be protective in the CD45RBhi model of colitis, wherein transfer of T cells from IL17A−/− vs. wild-type mice greatly worsens disease (14). Dige et al. reported that while circulating IL-17A-producing CD45R0+CD4+ T cells are significantly increased in CD patients vs. normal controls, patients who respond to treatment with the anti-TNF agent, adalimumab, have a 2–3-fold increase in IL-17A+ cells, suggesting a possible protective function (15). Moreover, a recent clinical trial with the anti-IL-17A antibody, secukinumab, in active CD not only failed to show efficacy, but also resulted in deterioration of symptoms (16), in contrast to successful phase II trials in other inflammatory conditions (17–19). The authors speculate that this outcome may be due to inhibiting IL-17A’s protective effects in the intestine as observed in earlier animal studies (16). Colombel et al. alternatively suggest that this effect may be due to IL-17A countering yeast infections, a suspected provocateur in CD-associated inflammation, and exacerbation may be due to overgrowth of Candida species, thus provoking a flare (20).
While the complex role of IL-17 during chronic gut inflammation remains unresolved, the contribution of IL-17A in the development of fibrosis has evolved. IL-17A promotes activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) (21) and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts (22). Additionally, IL-17A−/− mice show reduced fibrosis in inflammatory skin models (23) and IL-17A is essential to fibrogenesis in pulmonary fibrosis models (8). The role of IL-17 in CD fibrosis has recently been reported by Biancheri and colleagues (24), wherein IL-17 is overexpressed in strictures, wherein myofibroblasts possess IL-17A receptors, have reduced migratory ability, and produce more collagen and TIMP1 in response to IL-17A. As such, IL-17A appears to be important in promoting intestinal fibrosis, but given the multifaceted functions of IL-17 and the deleterious outcomes observed with secukinumab, patient selection in future clinical studies inhibiting IL-17A should be carefully considered. Targeted treatment to cohorts of patients with fibrosis and limited inflammatory activity may be a safer strategy. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that only a specific subpopulation of IL-17A-producing Th17 cells with transient c-kit expression and stable MDR1 activity are proinflammatory in CD patients (25). It remains to be seen if this novel subpopulation plays an important role in fibrosis. Selective inhibition of these specific cells may prove to be more therapeutically efficacious than nonspecific inhibition of IL-17A.
TL1A
TL1A/TNF superfamily 15 (TNFSF15) is the only recognized ligand for its functional receptor, death receptor 3 (DR3). Previous studies report its importance in the pathogenesis of IBD where its overexpression is localized to macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and lymphocytes, in both active CD and ulcerative colitis (26, 27). Genome wide association studies (GWAS) in IBD patients have identified and confirmed the existence of protective and at-risk genetic polymorphisms in tnfsf15 (TL1A) and tnfrsf6b (DcR3) (28–30). Interestingly, subgroup analysis from the secukinumab anti-Il-17A study established an association between lack of response and absence of the rs4263839 tnfsf15 polymorphism, believed to increase TL1A activity, and suggests a link between IL-17A and TL1A-driven inflammation (16). Wallace et al. investigated this further using the T cell transfer colitis model and showed that donor T cells from IL-17−/− mice transferred into RAG−/− recipients reiterated the results of the secukinumab study by exacerbating colitis, while donor T cells from TL1A-transgenic (Tg) mice produced even more severe disease (31). Colitis was improved following transfer of T cells from IL-17−/−TL1A-Tg vs. IL-17+/+TL1A-Tg mice, supporting earlier work in experimental encephalitis where TL1A was critical for Th17 differentiation and proliferation, and worsened disease severity (32). Together, these data corroborate the concept that IL-17/Th17 immune responses are involved in TL1A-driven inflammation.
Increased expression of both TL1A and DR3 has been reported in other animal models of colitis, and treatment with neutralizing antibodies against TL1A are effective in treating DSS-induced and G-protein ai2 deficient colitic mice (33). Shih et al. first reported that global overexpression of TL1A results in increased collagen deposition in both the small intestines and colon of TL1A-Tg mice (34). In a follow-up study, specific TL1A overexpression in either myeloid, lymphoid, or both lineages also induced collagen deposition and overt, albeit mild, colonic fibrosis (35). Performing either DSS-induced or T cell transfer colitis on lymphoid- or myeloid-specific TL1A-Tg mice exacerbates inflammation as well as small and large intestinal fibrostenosis that is not associated with elevated levels of IL-13, but with IL-17 (36). Fibrosis can be reversed upon treatment with a neutralizing TL1A antibody and is associated with decreased connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), TGFβ1, and insulin-like grown factor-1 (IGF-1), while also reducing fibroblast and myofibroblast numbers (37). Thus, TL1A-Tg mice represent a novel model and TL1A may serve as a future therapeutic target to modulate intestinal fibrosis.
The renin-angiotensin system
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is classically considered a regulator of blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis. However, with the discovery of local RAS in various tissues and an evolving nexus of active peptides and receptors, the pleiotropic role of this system is increasingly recognized in other biologic functions. The key effector peptide in RAS is angiotensin II (Ang-II), which is produced by cleavage of angiotensin I by the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), and exerts its effects through the AT1 receptor. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) block AT1 and were initially developed for the management of hypertension. Nonetheless, Ang-II has been shown to have multiple proinflammatory and profibrogenic roles in various organs. Ang-II increases reactive oxygen species in the heart (38) and kidney (39), and promotes chemotaxis of inflammatory cells, an effect abrogated by the ARB, losartan (40). The proinflammatory actions of Ang-II are also partially enacted through DCs, which have enhanced migration, maturation, and antigen presenting ability when stimulated by Ang-II, a phenomenon also reversed by ARBs (41, 42).
Recently, association between IL-17 and Ang-II is becoming evident. Ang-II modulates T cell responses in experimental autoimmune encephalitis, wherein CD4+ T cells produce elevated Ang-II levels and increase secretion of IL-17 and IFNγ that is reversed by ARBs or ACE-inhibitors (43). Ang-II also promotes IL-17 production from splenic T cells following malaria infection in mice, which is largely attenuated by losartan (44). Together, these data suggest that the proinflammatory actions of RAS are likely mediated through T cell responses and enhanced IL-17 production.
In regard to fibrosis, Ang-II promotes renal and cardiac fibrosis through induction of TGFβ, leading to the activation of profibrotic pathways (6, 45). Pharmacotherapies that suppress RAS decrease disease progression, morbidity and mortality, and are now fundamental to the clinical management of chronic kidney and cardiac disease (46, 47). In the liver, Ang-II promotes HSC proliferation and TGFβ production, and is in turn, produced locally by HSCs (48, 49). Ang-II is upregulated in human cirrhotic livers and ARBs have been shown to attenuate fibrosis in animal models (50) and pilot human liver disease studies (51).
Within the gastrointestinal tract, all components of RAS are expressed (52) and mucosal levels of Ang-II are elevated in Crohn’s colitis (53). The angiotensinogen-6 AA genotype is associated with CD (54) and serum levels of RAS subcomponents are altered in IBD (55). Experimentally, the ACE-inhibitor, enaliprilat, reduces inflammation in colitic IL-10-deficient mice (56). Recently, Wengrower et al. investigated the effects of losartan in the chronic TNBS colitis model (57). Oral administration of losartan significantly reduced fibrosis and dramatically decreased mucosal TGFβ levels. While the relevance to human IBD and fibrosis in this model may have limitations, significant reduction of fibrosis and TGFβ in this study suggests that targeting RAS using ARBs is an important and potential anti-fibrotic strategy.
Novel models of intestinal fibrosis
Novel, as well as modifications of existing, animal models of intestinal fibrosis are rapidly emerging (Table I) and enhance investigation of mechanistic pathways, particularly for the early stages of fibrogenesis. The role of microbes in IBD and intestinal fibrosis has rapidly become a key area of interest as results from GWAS repeatedly highlight genes responsible for innate immunity, mucosal barrier integrity, and bacterial sensing (58). Moreover, multiple studies demonstrate gut bacterial dysbiosis in IBD patients compared to healthy controls (59). In fact, gut inflammation in almost all animal models of colitis, as well as in human CD, is either ameliorated or absent under germ-free (GF) conditions and/or decreased after antibiotic treatment, respectively, emphasizing the central role of host-microbial interactions in the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and fibrosis (60).
Adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC) infection
A number of IBD animal models utilize specific microbes or microbial components to generate inflammation and subsequent fibrosis, including the AIEC infection model. Members of the E. coli family represent normal constituents of a healthy intestinal microbiota. E. coli can acquire virulence factors and become pathogenic; AIEC are an example of such a pathogenic subtype (61). AIEC are able to adhere to, and invade, the gut epithelium and provoke a chronic inflammatory response. Their presence is frequently observed in CD patients and is suspected to play a role in the initiation and/or maintenance of inflammation. In the chronic AIEC infection model, mice are pretreated with streptomycin prior to receiving NRG857 (a human CD isolate of AIEC) by oral gavage. Small et al (61) showed that this infection results in ileal and colonic inflammation involving Th1 and Th17 immune responses and protection by CD8+ cells. The resulting inflammation leads to cecal and colonic fibrosis in multiple mouse strains, in varying degrees, and progresses to transmural fibrosis after 63 days post-infection. This model shares significant similarities with CD and utilizes bacteria of likely relevance to the human condition. Conversely, while ileitis is observed in some mouse strains, it is significantly milder than in the colon and does not result in fibrosis. Strictures are also absent and the effects of abrogating inflammation or treatment with conventional pharmacotherapeutics has not been reported. Further investigation of these factors and genetic susceptibility loci may yield a relevant and easily replicable model of intestinal fibrosis, with particular utility in studying host responses to infection.
SAMP1/YitFc (SAMP) mouse strain
SAMP mice represents a model of Th1/Th2-driven chronic enteritis, with Th1 events predominating early and increasing as disease severity progresses, while Th2 immune responses are observed later when chronic inflammation is established (62, 63). Disease in SAMP is localized to the ileum, occurs spontaneously without chemical, genetic or immunological manipulation, and shares common histological features and response to therapy with human CD (reviewed in 64). Similar to CD patients, both TL1A and DR3 are upregulated in the inflamed ilea of SAMP mice, with lamina propria DCs serving as the major source of TL1A, which likely contributes to Th1-mediated inflammation through induction of IFNγ (65). Concurrent with the prevalence of Th2 immune responses observed during the later, chronic stages of ileitis, hypertrophy of the ileal muscularis propria, extensive collagen deposition, and frank stricture formation occur in SAMP with advanced disease (66). However, the progression and potential mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis in these mice have never been fully characterized. Preliminary findings from our laboratory suggest that fibrosis in SAMP is first observed at 20 weeks of age, and reaches peak levels by 50 weeks, with a dramatic increase in the expression of collagen, IGF-1, and CTGF vs. AKR (parental control strain) mice (67).
Interestingly, ileitis in SAMP mice raised under GF conditions persists, but is markedly attenuated, both in incidence and severity, which is dependent on Th2 immune responses (68). These findings, similar to that observed in CD patients, highlight the importance of gut microbial constituents in chronic intestinal inflammation; foremost of which is the intracellular bacterial sensing receptor, NOD2. Nod2 polymorphisms confer an increased risk of CD and are associated with a more aggressive disease course, in addition to a fibrostenotic phenotype and consequent increased surgery rate (69). Although SAMP mice do not appear to have mutations within the nod2 gene, Corridoni et al. recently demonstrated that SAMP mice possess a functional defect in NOD2 signalling and fail to respond to muramyl dipeptide, a bacterial product recognized by NOD2 (70). Furthermore, this defect is restricted to the hematopoietic compartment and leads to impaired clearance of Salmonella infection. NOD2 has also been linked to IL-17 in experimental colitis. Erman et al. investigated the role of IL-17A-secreting innate lymphoid cells in a mouse model of microbiota-driven immune-mediated colitis (71), reporting that pathogenic IL-17A-dependent immune responses were induced by microbial stimulation of DCs through NOD2 and that deletion of NOD2 prevents the development of colitis. Although the role of IL-17 has not been extensively studied in SAMP mice, a clear advantage for using this model is the ability to investigate the natural course of disease over time. Future studies using SAMP and other novel, relevant animal models (reviewed in 72) will serve as useful tools to investigate potential mechanisms involved in the development and progression of intestinal fibrosis and stricture formation, such as that observed in IBD.
Conclusion
Current advances in the field of inflammation-associated intestinal fibrosis propose a central role of IL-17/Th17-dependent immunity and associated mediators, including TL1A and components of RAS, as an upstream alternative pathway from the established paradigm of IL-13/Th2-dependent immune responses (summarized in Figure 1). In addition, the emergence of novel mouse models, including AIEC infection, and TL1A-Tg and SAMP mice, highlight the importance of the gut microbiome and will facilitate future mechanistic studies to investigate intestinal fibrosis.
Fig 1. Emerging role of IL-17/Th17-dependent immune responses and the contribution of the gut microflora in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis.
Fibrosis results from an imbalance between ECM deposition and degradation, which is under the control of the MMP:TIMP expression ratio. Th2 immune responses and Th2 cytokines, particularly IL-13, have been implicated in upstream events leading to inflammation-associated gut fibrosis. Recent evidence, however, suggests that IL-17/Th17 immunity are also central to the process of fibrogenesis and links established profibrogenic molecules and pathways, including TGFβ and various growth factors, as well as novel profibrogenic mediators, such as TL1A/DR3 and Ang-II, to myofibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, resulting in intestinal fibrosis. In addition, the impact of the gut microflora and bacterial sensing receptors, such as NOD2, are emerging as important contributors not only to the pathogenesis of IBD, but also to gut fibrosis. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF).
Key points.
Despite the failure of the anti-IL-17A antibody, secukinumab, in treating active CD, the importance of IL-17 and Th17 immune responses in fibrosis is becoming clear and it may be possible to design future clinical trials targeting a more specific patient population.
The discovery of proinflammatory Th17 subpopulations provides the opportunity to interfere with proinflammatory Th17 responses without triggering the deleterious effects of inhibiting regulatory anti-inflammatory functions.
The central role played by TL1A in inflammation-associated fibrosis and the improvement observed with anti-TL1A antibody treatment in animal studies, despite residual inflammation, heralds a novel putative target for anti-fibrotic pharmacotherapy in CD.
Evidence supports a significant role for angiotensin II in gut fibrosis as well as inflammation; the availability of widely used, safe and well-tolerated oral antagonists suggest that these medications could rapidly enter human translational studies.
Recent advances in the development of novel and relevant animal models of intestinal fibrosis, such as the AIEC infection model and the SAMP mouse strain, will facilitate future investigation to study important contributions of the gut microbiota, dissect critical mechanisms during the natural course of disease over time, as well as aid in evaluating potential anti-fibrotic strategies.
Acknowledgments
Disclosure of funding: This work was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK056762, DK091222, and AI102269) and from the DeGregorio Family Foundation (to TTP)
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References and recommended reading
*of special interest
**of outstanding interest
- 1.Van Assche G, Geboes K, Rutgeerts P. Medical therapy for Crohn’s disease strictures. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10(1):55–60. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200401000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wynn TA. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(8):583–94. doi: 10.1038/nri1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elias JA, Zhu Z, Chupp G, Homer RJ. Airway remodeling in asthma. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(8):1001–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI8124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bailey JR, Bland PW, Tarlton JF, et al. IL-13 promotes collagen accumulation in Crohn’s disease fibrosis by down-regulation of fibroblast MMP synthesis: a role for innate lymphoid cells? PloS One. 2012;7(12):e52332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee CG, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, et al. Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor beta(1) J Exp Med. 2001;194(6):809–21. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Speca S, Giusti I, Rieder F, Latella G. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(28):3635–61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maddur MS, Miossec P, Kaveri SV, Bayry J. Th17 cells: biology, pathogenesis of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and therapeutic strategies. Am J Pathol. 2012;181(1):8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilson MS, Madala SK, Ramalingam TR, et al. Bleomycin and IL-1beta-mediated pulmonary fibrosis is IL-17A dependent. J Exp Med. 2010;207(3):535–52. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tan Z, Qian X, Jiang R, Liu Q, Wang Y, Chen C, et al. IL-17A plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis through hepatic stellate cell activation. J Immunol. 2013;191(4):1835–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu Y, Zhu H, Su Z, Sun C, Yin J, Yuan H, et al. IL-17 contributes to cardiac fibrosis following experimental autoimmune myocarditis by a PKCbeta/Erk1/2/NF-kappaB-dependent signaling pathway. Int Immunol. 2012;24(10):605–12. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxs056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yen D, Cheung J, Scheerens H, Poulet F, et al. IL-23 is essential for T cell-mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(5):1310–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI21404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fujino S, Andoh A, Bamba S, et al. Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2003;52(1):65–70. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Holtta V, Klemetti P, Sipponen T, et al. IL-23/IL-17 immunity as a hallmark of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(9):1175–84. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O’Connor W, Jr, Kamanaka M, Booth CJ, et al. A protective function for interleukin 17A in T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(6):603–9. doi: 10.1038/ni.1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *15.Dige A, Stoy S, Rasmussen TK, et al. Increased levels of circulating Th17 cells in quiescent versus active Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(3):248–55. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.06.015. This paper provides further evidence of the dichotomous roles of Th17 cells in CD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **16.Hueber W, Sands BE, Lewitzky S, et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61(12):1693–700. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301668. This clinical trial demonstrates the deleterious effects of unselective IL-17A blockade in human CD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baeten D, Baraliakos X, Braun J, et al. Anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9906):1705–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61134-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Genovese MC, Durez P, Richards HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, dose-finding, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):863–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rich P, Sigurgeirsson B, Thaci D, et al. Secukinumab induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II regimen-finding study. Brit J Derm. 2013;168(2):402–11. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Colombel JF, Sendid B, Jouault T, Poulain D. Secukinumab failure in Crohn’s disease: the yeast connection? Gut. 2013;62(5):800–1. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meng F, Wang K, Aoyama T, Grivennikov SI, et al. Interleukin-17 signaling in inflammatory, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells exacerbates liver fibrosis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):765–76. e1–3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Valente AJ, Yoshida T, Gardner JD, et al. Interleukin-17A stimulates cardiac fibroblast proliferation and migration via negative regulation of the dual-specificity phosphatase MKP-1/DUSP-1. Cell Signal. 2012;24(2):560–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Okamoto Y, Hasegawa M, Matsushita T, Hamaguchi Y, Huu DL, Iwakura Y, et al. Potential roles of interleukin-17A in the development of skin fibrosis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(11):3726–35. doi: 10.1002/art.34643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **24.Biancheri P, Pender SL, Ammoscato F, et al. The role of interleukin 17 in Crohn’s disease-associated intestinal fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-6-13. This paper demonstrates the important role of IL-17A in CD fibrosis and the effects of IL-17A on myofibroblasts, indicating its role in specific fibrogenic pathways. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **25.Ramesh R, Kozhaya L, McKevitt K, et al. Pro-inflammatory human Th17 cells selectively express P-glycoprotein and are refractory to glucocorticoids. J Exp Med. 2014;211(1):89–104. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130301. This elegant paper describes a novel subopulation of Th17 cells that are proinflammatory and steroid refractory, and represent a potential target for specific Th17 inhibition and may also explain the common phenomenon of steroid refractory CD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bamias G, Martin C, 3rd, Marini M, et al. Expression, localization, and functional activity of TL1A, a novel Th1-polarizing cytokine in inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol. 2003;171(9):4868–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Prehn JL, Mehdizadeh S, Landers CJ, et al. Potential role for TL1A, the new TNF-family member and potent costimulator of IFN-gamma, in mucosal inflammation. Clin Immunol. 2004;112(1):66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2004.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thiebaut R, Kotti S, Jung C, Merlin F, et al. TNFSF15 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease in a new European cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):384–91. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yamazaki K, McGovern D, Ragoussis J, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in TNFSF15 confer susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(22):3499–506. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kugathasan S, Baldassano RN, Bradfield JP, et al. Loci on 20q13 and 21q22 are associated with pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Gen. 2008;40(10):1211–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wallace KL, Zheng L, Kanazawa Y, et al. 783 TL1A Modulates the Differential Effect of IL-17 Blockade on Mucosal Inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(5):S–133. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pappu BP, Borodovsky A, Zheng TS, et al. TL1A-DR3 interaction regulates Th17 cell function and Th17-mediated autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 2008;205(5):1049–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Takedatsu H, Michelsen KS, Wei B, et al. TL1A (TNFSF15) regulates the development of chronic colitis by modulating both T-helper 1 and T-helper 17 activation. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(2):552–67. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shih DQ, Barrett R, Zhang X, et al. Constitutive TL1A (TNFSF15) expression on lymphoid or myeloid cells leads to mild intestinal inflammation and fibrosis. PloS One. 2011;6(1):e16090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *35.Zheng L, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. Sustained Tl1a Expression on Both Lymphoid and Myeloid Cells Leads to Mild Spontaneous Intestinal Inflammation and Fibrosis. Eur J Microbiol & Immunol. 2013;3(1):11–20. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.1.2. This paper describes the effects of TL1A overexpression leading to gut inflammation and fibrosis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barrett R, Zhang X, Koon HW, et al. Constitutive TL1A expression under colitogenic conditions modulates the severity and location of gut mucosal inflammation and induces fibrostenosis. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(2):636–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **37.Shih DQ, Zheng L, Zhang X. Inhibition of a novel fibrogenic factor Tl1a reverses established colonic fibrosis. Mucosal immunology. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.37. Epub ahead of print, May 21, 2014. This paper describes the effects of anti-TL1A antibody treatment on intestinal fibrosis and may represent an important new pharmacological target in IBD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cheng TH, Cheng PY, Shih NL, et al. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in angiotensin II-induced endothelin-1 gene expression in rat cardiac fibroblasts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(10):1845–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wilson SK. Role of oxygen-derived free radicals in acute angiotensin II--induced hypertensive vascular disease in the rat. Circ Res. 1990;66(3):722–34. doi: 10.1161/01.res.66.3.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dai Q, Xu M, Yao M, Sun B. Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists exert anti-inflammatory effects in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152(7):1042–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lapteva N, Ide K, Nieda M, Ando Y, et al. Activation and suppression of renin-angiotensin system in human dendritic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296(1):194–200. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00855-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Muller DN, Shagdarsuren E, Park JK, et al. Immunosuppressive treatment protects against angiotensin II-induced renal damage. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(5):1679–93. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Platten M, Youssef S, Hur EM, et al. Blocking angiotensin-converting enzyme induces potent regulatory T cells and modulates TH1- and TH17-mediated autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(35):14948–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903958106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Silva-Filho JL, Souza MC, Ferreira-Dasilva CT, et al. Angiotensin II is a new component involved in splenic T lymphocyte responses during Plasmodium berghei ANKA infection. PloS One. 2013;8(4):e62999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kagami S, Border WA, Miller DE, Noble NA. Angiotensin II stimulates extracellular matrix protein synthesis through induction of transforming growth factor-beta expression in rat glomerular mesangial cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(6):2431–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI117251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Irons BK, Tsikouris JP, Thomas AA. The use of angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;44(6):718–24. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200412000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cantarovich F, Rangoonwala B. Therapeutic effects of angiotensin II inhibition or blockade on the progression of chronic renal disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2003;57(9):801–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bataller R, Gines P, Nicolas JM, Gorbig MN, Garcia-Ramallo E, Gasull X, et al. Angiotensin II induces contraction and proliferation of human hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(6):1149–56. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bataller R, Sancho-bru P, Ginès P, et al. Activated human hepatic stellate cells express the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(1):117–25. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00695-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Croquet V, Moal F, Veal N, et al. Hemodynamic and antifibrotic effects of losartan in rats with liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2002;37(6):773–80. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sookoian S, Fernandez MA, Castano G. Effects of six months losartan administration on liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients: a pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(48):7560–3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i48.7560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hirasawa K, Sato Y, Hosoda Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of angiotensin II receptor and local renin-angiotensin system in human colonic mucosa. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50(2):275–82. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jaszewski R, Tolia V, Ehrinpreis MN, et al. Increased colonic mucosal angiotensin I and II concentrations in Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(6):1543–8. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91088-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hume GE, Fowler EV, Lincoln D, et al. Angiotensinogen and transforming growth factor beta1: novel genes in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. J Med Genet. 2006;43(10):e51. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.040477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *55.Garg M, Burrell LM, Velkoska E, et al. Upregulation of circulating components of the alternative renin-angiotensin system in inflammatory bowel disease: A pilot study. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2014 Feb 6; doi: 10.1177/1470320314521086. epub ahead of print. This study provides early insight into the potential role of alternative RAS subcomponents in IBD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *56.Sueyoshi R, Ignatoski KM, Daignault S, Okawada M, Teitelbaum DH. Angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor reduces colitis severity in an IL-10 knockout model. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(11):3165–77. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2825-4. This study for the first time demonstrates the efficacy of RAS inhibition in colitic IL-10 knockout mice. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **57.Wengrower D, Zanninelli G, Latella G, et al. Losartan reduces trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid-induced colorectal fibrosis in rats. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26(1):33–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/628268. This paper demonstrates the beneficial effects of losartan in a model where there is substantial gut fibrosis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rivas MA, Beaudoin M, Gardet A, et al. Deep resequencing of GWAS loci identifies independent rare variants associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1066–73. doi: 10.1038/ng.952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Abraham C, Medzhitov R. Interactions between the host innate immune system and microbes in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1729–37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1489–99. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **61.Small CL, Reid-Yu SA, McPhee JB, Coombes BK. Persistent infection with Crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive Escherichia coli leads to chronic inflammation and intestinal fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1957. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2957. The authors present a novel, reproducible, and easy model of intestinal fibrosis using bacterial strains that are directly relevant in human CD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kosiewicz MM, Nast CC, Krishnan A, et al. Th1-type responses mediate spontaneous ileitis in a novel murine model of Crohn’s disease. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(6):695–702. doi: 10.1172/JCI10956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bamias G, Martin C, Mishina M, et al. Proinflammatory effects of TH2 cytokines in a murine model of chronic small intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(3):654–66. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pizarro TT, Pastorelli L, Bamias G, et al. SAMP1/YitFc mouse strain: a spontaneous model of Crohn’s disease-like ileitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(12):2566–84. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bamias G, Mishina M, Nyce M, Ross WG, Kollias G, Rivera-Nieves J, et al. Role of TL1A and its receptor DR3 in two models of chronic murine ileitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(22):8441–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510903103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rivera-Nieves J, Bamias G, Vidrich A, et al. Emergence of perianal fistulizing disease in the SAMP1/YitFc mouse, a spontaneous model of chronic ileitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(4):972–82. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mattioli B, Pastorelli L, De Salvo C, et al. IL-33-dependent induction of intestinal profibrotic gene expression and myofibroblast hypertrophy: potential role in inflammatory-associated gut fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2001;140(5):S844–845. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bamias G, Okazawa A, Rivera-Nieves J, et al. Commensal bacteria exacerbate intestinal inflammation but are not essential for the development of murine ileitis. J Immunol. 2007;178(3):1809–18. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ippoliti A, Devlin S, Mei L, Yang H, et al. Combination of innate and adaptive immune alterations increased the likelihood of fibrostenosis in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(8):1279–85. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **70.Corridoni D, Kodani T, Rodriguez-Palacios A, et al. Dysregulated NOD2 predisposes SAMP1/YitFc mice to chronic intestinal inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(42):16999–7004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311657110. This paper demonstrates the role of NOD2 dysregulation in SAMP ileitis and provides insight into human CD, wherein most patients lack the NOD2 mutation, but still have disrupted bacterial handling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *71.Ermann J, Staton T, Glickman JN, et al. Nod/Ripk2 signaling in dendritic cells activates IL-17A-secreting innate lymphoid cells and drives colitis in T-bet−/−.Rag2−/− (TRUC) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(25):E2559–66. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408540111. This paper demonstrates the importance of NOD2 signaling in DCs that activate IL-17A-producing innate lymphoid cells that drive experimental colitis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **72.De Salvo C, Ray S, Pizarro TT. Mechanisms and models for intestinal fibrosis in inflammatory bowel disease. J Dig Dis. 2014 doi: 10.1159/000367822. In Press. This recent review discusses the spectrum of established, as well as novel, animal models of intestinal fibrosis, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each model system. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

