Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain GSY2239 is derived from an industrial yeast strain used to ferment ale-style beer. We present here the 11.5-Mb draft genome sequence for this organism.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Saccharomyces spp. have been utilized by humans to brew beer for >7,000 years (1). Over this time period, domesticated strains have evolved that differ in their fermentation characteristics, alcohol tolerance, fermentation temperature, sugar utilization, and flavor compounds (2, 3). In general, there have been fewer molecular or genomic studies of brewing yeasts than those of other yeast strains, because brewing yeasts are typically polyploid or allopolyploid, contain high levels of heterozygosity, and have low spore viabilities (3–5). However, recent comparative genomic studies of wine and ale yeasts have demonstrated that selection for specific physiological properties during fermentation can result in gene duplication, chromosomal rearrangements, interspecific hybridization, horizontal gene transfer, and high levels of sequence variation (6–10).
GSY2239 was derived from the industrial brewing strain Wyeast1388 (Wyeast Laboratories). Diploid spores of Wyeast1388, an HO+ (homothallic) tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, were isolated using tetrad microdissection (11). A single spore was chosen for an additional round of meiosis and self-mating to minimize heterozygosity (to make genome assembly easier), yielding isolate GSY2239. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using known reference strains confirmed GSY2239 to be a tetraploid.
To minimize mitochondrial DNA sequences, GSY2239 was plated on yeast extract-peptone (YEP)-glucose containing 30 µg/ml ethidium bromide (12) to induce petite mutations. After 2 days, multiple colonies were isolated, and lack of growth on a nonfermentable substrate (YEP-glycerol) was confirmed. For genomic DNA extraction, a single colony was grown overnight in 3 ml of YEP plus 2% dextrose. Cells were then resuspended in 200 µl of Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), whereby DNA was extracted using phenol:chloroform and resuspended in 200-µl of Tris EDTA (TE) buffer with RNase A (50 µg/ml).
Shotgun genome sequencing was performed using the GS-FLX Titanium platform (454 Life Sciences, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at the University of Arizona Genetics Core. Sequences were filtered to eliminate the resulting low-quality data (13), and the 491,192 high-quality reads remaining were assembled into contigs de novo using the Newbler assembler (454 Life Sciences), obtaining approximately 15-fold genome coverage. The GSY2239 genome displayed very low levels of heterozygosity (<0.004%); thus, sequences were assembled as for a single haplotype genome. An 11.5-Mb high-quality assembly with 578 contigs was obtained, corresponding to 98% of the S. cerevisiae S288C nuclear genome, with an average contig length of 20,313 bp, a maximum contig length of 219,755 bp, and an N50 contig length of 60,719 bp, for a total of 11,537,987 residues. Using the S. cerevisiae training set, the gene finder Augustus (14) identified ab initio 5,365 complete protein-coding genes on repeat-masked scaffolds (RepeatMasker [15]). A total of 5,354 of these genes had top BLAST hits to either S. cerevisiae (n = 5,341) or other Saccharomyces spp., including Saccharomyces carlsbergensis and Saccharomyces pastorianus (n = 13) (BLASTp E value, 1 × 10−3). The remaining 11 genes had top BLAST hits to other fungi and metazoans.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. LDOE00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, LDOE00000000.1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge the National Science Foundation for supporting this research and providing fellowship support to J.M.U., J.H.W., A.L.P., and B.L.H. with the NSF IGERT Program in Comparative Genomics at the University of Arizona (DGE-0654435).
The genome of S. cerevisiae strain GSY2239 was sequenced for comparative genome analyses as part of a graduate-level course at the University of Arizona.
We thank H. Ochman, M. Sullivan, A. E. Arnold, G. Sherlock, and S. Rounsley for their help in developing this project. We thank IGERT students P. Degnan, E. Suurmeyer, V. Martinson, J. Wertheim, D. Andrews, M. Wang, C. Maldonado, Z. Campbell, E. Dykstra, R. Fitak, D. Lawrence, R. Valenzuela, C. Brillhart, C. Brownlee, P. Humphrey, J. Jonas, J. Kunkel, M. Paniscus, and A. Racolta for helpful discussions on this project.
Footnotes
Citation U’Ren JM, Wisecaver JH, Paek AL, Dunn BL, Hurwitz BL. 2015. Draft genome sequence of the ale-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain GSY2239. Genome Announc 3(4):e00776-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00776-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hornsey IS. 2003. A history of beer and brewing. RSC Paperbacks, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Corran HS. 1975. A history of brewing. David and Charles, Newton Abbot, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mortimer RK. 2000. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res 10:403–409. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Legras J-L, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, Karst F. 2007. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 16:2091–2102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smart KA. 2007. Brewing yeast genomes and genome-wide expression and proteome profiling during fermentation. Yeast 24:993–1013. doi: 10.1002/yea.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barrio E, Gonzalez SS, Arias A, Belloch C, Querol A. 2006. Molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptive evolution of industrial yeasts, p 153–174. In Querol A, Fleet GH (ed), Yeasts in food and beverages. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ. 2011. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7:e1001287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1185–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E, Galeote V, Gavory F, Mallet S, Cambon B, Legras J-L, Wincker P, Casaregola S, Dequin S. 2009. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:16333–16338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904673106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sipiczki M. 2008. Interspecies hybridization and recombination in Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 8:996–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dunn B, Sherlock G. 2008. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res 18:1610–1623. doi: 10.1101/gr.076075.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Evans IH. 1996. Yeast protocols: methods in cell and molecular biology. In Methods in molecular biology, vol 53. Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Welch DM. 2007. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol 8:R143. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoff KJ, Stanke M. 2013. WebAUGUSTUS—a Web service for training AUGUSTUS and predicting genes in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W123–W128. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. 2003. RepeatMasker. Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA. http://repeatmasker.org. [Google Scholar]