Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jul 23;3(4):e00802-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00802-15

Genome Sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae CICC10011, a Promising Strain for High 2,3-Butanediol Production

Ying-Jia Tong 1, Xiao-Jun Ji 1,, Lu-Gang Liu 1, Meng-Qiu Shen 1, He Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC4513154  PMID: 26205860

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae CICC10011, a promising 2,3-butanediol producer, has received much attention because of its high productivity. Here, the first draft genome sequence of this efficient strain may provide the genetic basis for further insights into the metabolic and regulatory mechanisms underlying the production of 2,3-butanediol at a high titer.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Due to its extensive industrial applications in various fields, such as foods, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, transport fuels, and agrochemical industries (13), 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BD) is a promising biobased bulk chemical. Many microorganisms, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, and Serratia marcescens (1, 2, 46), are known to be able to produce 2,3-BD. Among all these strains, K. pneumoniae was the first to be identified (1, 7) and is one of the best organisms that has shown the potential for industrial 2,3-BD production because of its more complete fermentation, broad substrate spectrum (hexoses, pentose, certain disaccharides, and uronic acid derived from the hydrolysates of hemicellulosic and cellulosic materials), cultural adaptability, and high efficiency (1, 7, 8). As a commercial strain, K. pneumoniae CICC10011 is regarded as a highly efficient producer of 2,3-BD (9, 10). Given the limited genetic information available on the metabolic mechanism underlying the formation of 2,3-BD, research about this strain is mainly focused on fermentation conditions and fermentation substrates rather than metabolic engineering. We therefore sequenced and analyzed the genome of strain K. pneumoniae CICC10011 to provide the genetic basis for the production of 2,3-BD at a high titer.

Here, we present the draft genome sequence of strain K. pneumoniae CICC10011, obtained using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 system at the Chinese National Human Genome Center, Shanghai, China. The reads were trimmed and de novo assembled with Velvet version 1.2.03 (11). Open reading frames (ORFs) were identified using the program Glimmer 3.02 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/glimmer/index.shtml). These ORFs were further annotated by comparison with the NCBI nr, KEGG, and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases. The draft genome sequence of K. pneumoniae CICC10011 was annotated with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP). rRNAs were predicted by RNAmmer (12), and tRNAs were predicted by tRNAscan (13).

The draft genome sequence of K. pneumoniae CICC10011 comprises 4,883,939 bp, which was assembled into 58 contigs. The N50 quality measurement of the contigs was 162,338 bp, with a G+C content of 58.4%, and the largest contig assembled was 856,167 bp. The genome sequence was annotated using the PGAAP. The draft genome sequence of CICC10011 contains 5,603 genes, including 3 rRNA genes (5S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and 23S rRNA), and 39 tRNA genes. The annotation results showed that 4,234 proteins have clear biological functions; of these, 3,173 proteins have KEGG orthologs, and 4,433 proteins have COG classifications.

The genome sequence of this promising strain provides significant opportunities to further investigate the metabolic and regulatory mechanisms underlying the formation of 2,3-BD, to explain the genetic reasons for its high productivity and biomass, to analyze the byproducts that may hinder the accumulation of 2,3-BD, and to thoroughly understand the genetic, biological, and physiological characteristics of widely used K. pneumoniae strains.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. LBCM00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, LBCM01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (no. 21225626), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21376002 and 21476111), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (no. 2011AA02A207), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Footnotes

Citation Tong Y-J, Ji X-J, Liu L-G, Shen M-Q, Huang H. 2015. Genome sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae CICC10011, a promising strain for high 2,3-butanediol production. Genome Announc 3(4):e00802-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00802-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Celińska E, Grajek W. 2009. Biotechnological production of 2,3-butanediol—current state and prospects. Biotechnol Adv 27:715–725. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ji X-J, Huang H, Ouyang P-K. 2011. Microbial 2,3-butanediol production: a state-of-the-art review. Biotechnol Adv 29:351–364. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zeng A-P, Sabra W. 2011. Microbial production of diols as platform chemicals: recent progresses. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:749–757. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim D-K, Rathnasingh C, Song H, Lee HJ, Seung D, Chang YK. 2013. Metabolic engineering of a novel Klebsiella oxytoca strain for enhanced 2,3-butanediol production. J Biosci Bioeng 116:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu Y, Chu H, Gao C, Tao F, Zhou Z, Li K, Li L, Ma C, Xu P. 2014. Systematic metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for high-yield production of fuel bio-chemical 2,3-butanediol. Metab Eng 23:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee HK, Maddox IS. 1986. Continuous production of 2,3-butanediol from whey permeate using Klebsiella pneumoniae immobilized in calcium alginate. Enzyme Microb Technol 8:409–411. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(86)90147-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garg SK, Jain A. 1995. Fermentative production of 2,3-butanediol: a review. Bioresour Technol 51:103–109. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)00136-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Petrov K, Petrova P. 2009. High production of 2,3-butanediol from glycerol by Klebsiella pneumoniae G31. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:659–665. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qin J, Xiao Z, Ma C, Xie N, Liu P, Xu P. 2006. Production of 2,3-butanediol by Klebsiella pneumoniae using glucose and ammonium phosphate. Chin J Chem Eng 14:132–136. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(06)60050-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun L-H, Wang X-D, Dai J-Y, Xiu Z-L. 2009. Microbial production of 2,3-butanediol from Jerusalem artichoke tubers by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:847–852. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1823-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES