Skip to main content
Indian Dermatology Online Journal logoLink to Indian Dermatology Online Journal
. 2015 Jul-Aug;6(4):246–247.

Hair dye dermatitis and para-phenylenediamine contact sensitivity

U K Sudhir Nayak 1,
PMCID: PMC4513402  PMID: 26225327

Sir,

We read with interest the article by Mrinal Gupta, Vikram K. Mahajan, Karaninder S. Mehta, Pushpinder S. Chauhan.[1] Recent times have shown an increase in the use of hair coloring among the populace. In India, its use was initially restricted for disguising the grey and white hairs among the older population; recent times have seen a greater use among the younger generation who would like to experiment with their looks. Hair dye dermatitis is thus showing a higher incidence among the general population. Para-phenylene diamine (PPD) is perhaps the commonest and well-known component of hair dyes. PPD was first described in Hofmann in 1863.[2] This is a preferred constituent in many hair dyes in view of the longer lasting nature and black natural pigmentation imparted to the hair.[3]

PPD was labeled by the American Contact Dermatitis Society as Allergen of the year in 2006.[2] PPD is the most commonly implicated hair dye allergen. PPD and other related chemicals are also seen in photographic chemicals, rubber goods, leather, textiles, and so on.[4] Thus, contact sensitization to PPD can occur from numerous sources.

Population-based epidemiological studies have shown the incidence of PPD sensitivity to be 0.1%–1% among the general population.[5] However, in patients with dermatitis and especially with those with hair dye dermatitis, the sensitivity is significantly higher.[2] PPD also shows cross-sensitization with para-amino benzoic acid (PABA), para-amino salicylic acid, sulfonamides, azo dyes, and local anesthetics such as benzocaine and procaine.[6,7]

PPD use has commonly been associated with acute contact dermatitis, but other dermatoses associated with PPD use include lichen planus–like, erythema multiforme–like, urticarial, lymphomatoid contact dermatitis and even pigmented contact cheilitis.[2,6] PPD is also nowadays being combined with the traditional henna hair dyes to impart a darker and long-lasting color.[7] Greater use of tattoos by the younger generation predisposes them to the risk of PPD sensitization at a younger age itself.

Patch test remains the gold standard for diagnosis of contact sensitivity. Where patch test cannot be performed, the open test is recommended 48 h before using hair dyes to rule out sensitivity to PPD and other constituents.[2,7] An in vitro test to diagnose PPD allergy has also been described.[8]

Keeping the concentration of PPD to the basic minimum level in hair dyes at the manufacturing level must be considered. PPD-free labeled hair dyes and vegetable-based hair dyes are perhaps the best practical solution to those exhibiting PPD sensitization. It is however very important to check for absence of PPD in the content list of some of the vegetable and so-called herbal hair dyes. Hair stylists and patients while applying hair dyes are advised to use gloves to prevent contact with skin of the hands. Following proper instructions during hair dye application is also important.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gupta M, Mahajan VK, Mehta KS, Chauhan PS. Hair dye dermatitis and p-phenylenediamine contact sensitivity: A preliminary report. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:241–46. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.160253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Handa S, Mahajan R, De D. Contact dermatitis to hair dye: An update. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012;78:583–90. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.100556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, editors. Fischer's Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributor; 2008. Preservatives and vehicles in cosmetics and toiletries; pp. 303–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, editors. Fischer's Contact Dermatitis. 6th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributor; 2008. Specific instructions for patients with common contact allergens; pp. 733–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Filipiak B, et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy. 2001;56:1192–6. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mehta V, Nayak S, Balachandran C. Pigmented contact cheilitis to paraphenylenediamine. Indian J Dermatol. 2010;55:119–20. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.60370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madnani N, Khan K. Hair cosmetics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79:654–67. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.116734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kneilling M, Caroli U, Grimmel C, Fischer J, Eichner M, Wieder T, et al. Para-phenylenediamine-specific lymphocyte activation test: A sensitive in vitro assay to detect para-phenylenediamine sensitization in patients with severe allergic reactions. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:435–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Dermatology Online Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES