Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2015 Feb 20;4:50. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6157.1

ViennaNGS: A toolbox for building efficient next- generation sequencing analysis pipelines

Michael T Wolfinger 1,2,3,a, Jörg Fallmann 1, Florian Eggenhofer 1, Fabian Amman 1,4
PMCID: PMC4513691  PMID: 26236465

Abstract

Recent achievements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies lead to a high demand for reuseable software components to easily compile customized analysis workflows for big genomics data. We present ViennaNGS, an integrated collection of Perl modules focused on building efficient pipelines for NGS data processing. It comes with functionality for extracting and converting features from common NGS file formats, computation and evaluation of read mapping statistics, as well as normalization of RNA abundance. Moreover, ViennaNGS provides software components for identification and characterization of splice junctions from RNA-seq data, parsing and condensing sequence motif data, automated construction of Assembly and Track Hubs for the UCSC genome browser, as well as wrapper routines for a set of commonly used NGS command line tools.

Keywords: Perl, next generation sequencing, RNA-seq, read mapping, pipelines

Introduction

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have influenced both our understanding of genomic landscapes as well as our attitude towards handling big biological data. Emerging functional genomics methods based on high-throughput sequencing allow investigation of highly specialized and complex scientific questions, which continuously poses challenges in the design of analysis strategies. Moreover, the demand for efficient data analysis methods has dramatically increased. While a typical NGS analysis workflow is built on a cascade of routine tasks, individual steps are often specific for a certain assay, e.g. depend on a particular sequencing protocol.

A set of NGS analysis pipelines are available for general 1, 2, and specialized assays such as de-novo motif discovery 3. While these tools mostly cover the elementary steps of an analysis workflow, they often represent custom-tailored solutions that lack flexibility. Web-based approaches like Galaxy 4 cover a wide portfolio of available applications, however they do not offer enough room for power users who are used to the benefits of the command line.

The recently published HTSeq framework 5 as well as the biotoolbox package provide library modules for processing high-throughput data. While both packages implement NGS analysis functionality in a coherent manner, we encountered use cases that were not covered by these tools.

Motivation

The motivation for this contribution emerged in the course of the research consortium “RNA regulation of the transcriptome” (Austrian Science Fund project F43), which brings together more than a dozen experimental groups with various thematic backgrounds. In the line of this project it turned out that complex tasks in NGS analysis could easily be automated, whereas linking individual steps was very labour-intensive. As such, it became apparent that there is a strong need for modular and reusable software components that can efficiently be assembled into different full-fledged NGS analysis pipelines.

We present ViennaNGS, a Perl distribution that integrates high-level routines and wrapper functions for common NGS processing tasks. ViennaNGS is not an established pipeline per se, it rather provides tools and functionality for the development of NGS pipelines. It comes with a set of utility scripts that serve as reference implementation for most library functions and can readily be applied for specific tasks or integrated as-is into custom pipelines. Moreover, we provide extensive documentation, including a dedicated tutorial that showcases core features of the software and discusses common application scenarios.

Development of the ViennaNGS suite was triggered by two driving forces. On the one hand we wanted to return to the open source community our own contribution, which itself is heavily based and dependent on open source software. On the other hand, beside “open science” we advocate for the concept of “reproducible science” 6. Unfortunately, and to some extent surprising, bioinformatics analyses are often not fully reproducible due to inaccessibility of tools (keyword “in-house script”) or software versions used. It is therefore essential to ensure the entire chain of reproducibility from data generation to interpretation in the analysis of biological data.

Methods

The major design consideration for the ViennaNGS toolbox was to make available modular and reuseable code for NGS processing in a popular scripting language. We therefore implemented thematically related functionality in different Perl modules under the Bio namespace ( Figure 1), partly building on BioPerl 7 and the Moose object framework. Our focus is on consistent versioning, facilitated through Github hosting. In addition, ViennaNGS releases are available via the Comprehensive Perl Architecture Network (CPAN), thereby enabling users to get back to previous versions at any time in order to reenact conclusions drawn from shared biological data.

Figure 1. Schematic overview of ViennaNGS components.

Figure 1.

Core modules can be combined in a flexible manner to address individual analysis objectives and experimental setup.

ViennaNGS has been designed to close gaps in established analysis workflows by covering a wide range of processing steps from raw data to data visualization. In the following we introduce individual ViennaNGS components and describe their main functionality.

BAM manipulation and filtering

Once mapped to a reference genome, NGS data is typically stored in the widely used SAM/BAM file format. BAM is a binary format, which can easily be converted into text-based SAM format via samtools 8 for downstream analysis. However, modern NGS assays produce hundreds of millions of reads per sample, hence SAM files tend to become excessively large and can have a size of several hundred gigabytes. Given that storage resources are always limited, strategies to efficiently retrieve mapping information from BAM format are an asset. To accomodate that, we provide functionality for querying global mapping statistics and extracting specific alignment information from BAM files directly.

ViennaNGS::BamStat extracts both qualitative and quantitative information from BAM files, i.e. the amount of total alignments, aligned reads, as well as uniquely and multi mapped reads. Numbers are reported individually for single-end reads, paired-end fragments and pairs missing a mate. Quality-wise ViennaNGS::BamStat collects data on edit distance in the alignments, fraction of clipped bases, fraction of matched bases, and quality scores for entire alignments. Subsequently, ViennaNGS::BamStatSummary compares different samples in BAM format and illustrates results graphically. Summary information is made available in CSV format to facilitate downstream processing.

Efficient filtering of BAM files is among the most common tasks in NGS analysis pipelines. Building on the BioSamTools distribution, ViennaNGS::Bam provides a set of convenience routines for rapid manipulation of BAM files, including filters for unique and multiple alignments as well as functionality for splitting BAM files by strand, thereby creating two strand-specific BAM files. Results can optionally be converted to BedGraph or BigWig formats for visualization purposes.

Genomic annotation

Proper handling of genomic intervals is essential for NGS analysis pipelines. Several feature annotation formats have gained acceptance in the scientific community, including BED, GTF, GFF, etc., each having its particular benefits and drawbacks. While annotation for a certain organism is often only available in a specific format, interconversion among these formats can be regarded a routine task, and a pipeline should be capable of processing as many formats as possible.

We address this issue at different levels. On the one hand, we provide ViennaNGS::AnnoC, a lightweight annotation converter for non-spliced genomic intervals, which can be regarded a simple yet powerful solution for conversion of bacterial annotation data. On the other hand we have developed an abstract representation of genomic features via generic Moose-based classes, which provide functionality for efficient manipulation of BED4, BED6, BED12 and GTF/GFF elements, respectively, and allow for BED format conversion facilitated by ViennaNGS::Bed. ViennaNGS::MinimalFeature represents an elementary genomic interval, characterized by chromosome, start, end and strand. ViennaNGS::Feature extends ViennaNGS::MinimalFeature by two attributes, name and score, thereby creating a representation of a single BED6 element. ViennaNGS::FeatureChain pools a set of ViennaNGS::Feature objects via an array reference. All intervals of interest can be covered by a ViennaNGS::FeatureLine object, which holds a hash of references to ViennaNGS::FeatureChain objects ( Figure 2).

Figure 2. Class diagram illustrating the relations among generic Moose classes which are used as abstract representations of genomic intervals (only attributes are shown).

Figure 2.

This framework can handle annotation data by providing abstract data representations of genomic intervals such as exons, introns, splice junctions etc. It allows for efficient description and manipulation of genomic features up to the level of transcripts ( Figure 3). Conversely, it is highly generic and can be extended to hierachically higher levels such as genes composed of different transcript isoforms or clusters of paralogous genes.

Figure 3. Schematic representation of genomic interval classes in terms of their corresponding feature annotation.

Figure 3.

Simple intervals (“features”) are characterized by Bio::ViennaNGS::Feature objects (bottom box). At the next level, Bio::ViennaNGS::FeatureChain bundles these, thereby maintaining individual annotation chains for e.g. UTRs, exons, introns, splice junctions, etc. (middle box). The topmost level is given by Bio::ViennaNGS::FeatureLine objects, representing individual transcripts.

Visualization

Another cornerstone of NGS analysis pipelines is graphical representation of mapped sequencing data. In this context a standard application is visualization of Chip-seq peaks or RNA-seq coverage profiles. The latter are typically encoded in Wiggle format, or its indexed binary variant, BigWig, which can readily be displayed within a genome browser. In the same line, genomic annotation and intervals are often made available in BigBed format, an indexed binary version of BED. ViennaNGS::Util comes with wrapper routines for automated conversion from common formats like BAM to BigWig or BED to BigBed via third-party utilities 9. In addition, we have implemented interfaces for a selection of BEDtools 10 components as well as a collection of auxiliary routines.

The UCSC genome browser allows to display potentially large genomic data sets, that are hosted at Web-accessible locations by means of Track Hubs 11. On a more general basis this even works for custom organisms that are not supported by default through the UCSC genome browser, via Assembly Hubs. A typical use case is visualization of genomic annotation, RNA-seq coverage profiles and Chip-seq peaks for Arabidopsis thaliana (which is not available through the generic UCSC browser) via a locally hosted Assembly Hub. ViennaNGS::UCSC provides all relevant routines for automatic construction of Assembly and Track Hubs from genomic sequence and/or annotation. Besides automated Assembly and Track Hub generation, we support deployment of custom organism databases in local mirrors of the UCSC genome browser.

Gene expression and normalization

RNA-seq has become a standard approach for gene and transcript quantification by means of measuring the relative amount of RNA present in a certain sample or under a specific condition, thus ideally providing a good estimate for the relative molar concentration of RNA species. Simple “count-based” quantification models assume that the total number of reads mapping to a region can be used as a proxy for RNA abundance 12. A good measure for transcript abundance is ideally as closely proportional to the relative molar concentration of a RNA species as possible. Various measures have been proposed, one of the most prominent being RPKM (reads per kilobase per million). It accounts for different transcript lengths and sequencing depth by normalizing by the number of reads in a specific sample, divided by 10 6. It has, however, been shown that RPKM is not appropriate for measuring the relative molar concentration of a RNA species due to normalization by the total number of reads 13, 14.

Alternative measures that overcome this shortcoming have been suggested, e.g. TPM (transcript per million) ( Equation 1). Here, rather than normalizing by the total number of mapped reads, a proxy for the total number of transcript samples considering the sequencing reads per gene r g is used for normalization ( Equation 2). The variable rl is the read length and fl g the feature length of a gene region g. Consequently, T can be computed by summing over the set of all genes G.

TPMg=rg×rlf1g×106T(1)
T=gGrg×rlf1g(2)

We provide routines for the computation of TPM values for genomic intervals from raw read counts within ViennaNGS::Expression.

Characterization of splice junctions

ViennaNGS::SpliceJunc addresses a more specific problem, namely characterization of splice junctions which is becoming increasingly relevant for understanding alternative splicing. This module provides code for identification and characterization of splice junctions from short read mappers. It can detect novel splice junctions in RNA-seq data and generate visualization files. While we have focused on processing the output of segemehl 15, 16, the module can easily be extended for other splice-aware split read mappers.

Documentation and tutorial

The ViennaNGS suite comes with extensive documentation based on Perl’s POD system, thereby providing a single documentation base which is available through different channels, e.g. on the command line via the perldoc utility or on the Web via CPAN. Moreover, we provide ViennaNGS::Tutorial to guide prospective users through the development of basic NGS analysis pipelines. The tutorial is split into different chapters, each covering a common use case in NGS analysis and describing a possible solution.

Utilities

The ViennaNGS suite comes with a collection of complementary executable Perl scripts for accomplishing routine tasks often required in NGS data processing. These command line utilities serve as reference implementations of the routines implemented in the library and can readily be used for atomic tasks in NGS data processing. Table 1 lists the utilities and gives a short description of their functionality.

Table 1. Overview of the complementary utilities shipped with ViennaNGS.

While some of these scripts are re-implementations of functionality available elsewhere, they have been developed primarily as reference implementation of the library routines to help prospective ViennaNGS users getting started quickly with the development of custom pipelines.

Utility Description
assembly_hub_constructor.pl Construct Assembly Hubs for UCSC genome browser visualization
bam_quality_stat.pl Compute mapping/quality statistics along with publication-ready
figures
bam_split.pl Split BAM files by strand
bam_to_bigwig.pl Produce BigWig coverage profiles from BAM files for visualization
bam_uniq.pl Filter uniquely and multi mapped reads from BAM files
bed2bedGraph.pl Convert BED to (strand specific) bedGraph format
extend_bed.pl Extend genomic intervals in BED format at the 5′, 3′, or both ends
gff2bed.pl Convert bacterial RefSeq GFF3 annotation to BED12 format
kmer_analysis.pl Count k-mers of predefined length in FastQ and Fasta files
MEME_xml_motif_extractor.pl Compute basic statistics from MEME XML output
newUCSCdb.pl Create a new genome database in a local UCSC genome browser
instance
normalize_multicov.pl Compute normalized expression data in TPM from read counts
sj_visualizer.pl Convert splice junctions in segemehl BED6 splice junction format to
BED12
splice_site_summary.pl Identify and characterize splice junctions from RNA-seq data
track_hub_constructor.pl Construct Track Hubs for UCSC genome browser visualization
trim_fastq.pl Trim sequence and quality fields in FastQ format

Discussion

ViennaNGS is a comprehensive software library for rapid development of custom NGS analysis pipelines. We have successfully applied its components in the course of an ongoing, large scale collaboration project focusing on RNA regulation. It has been used with different genomics assays in a wide range of biological systems, including human, plants and bacteria. While we have primarily applied ViennaNGS in combination with the short read aligner segemehl 15, 16, it has also been used with Tophat 17 output very recently in a large scale transcriptome study of Ebola and Marburg virus infection in human and bat cells (Hölzer et al., unpublished data). Moreover, ViennaNGS will be used for automated UCSC genome browser integration in an upcoming version of TSSAR 18, a recently published approach for characterization of transcription start sites from dRNA-seq data.

ViennaNGS is actively developed and its functionality is constantly extended. In this line, we encourage the scientific community to contribute patches and novel features.

Data availability

Input data for the ViennaNGS tutorial is available from http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/ViennaNGS

Software availability

The ViennaNGS distribution is available through the Comprehensive Perl Architecture Network (CPAN) at and GitHub.

Software access

http://search.cpan.org/dist/Bio-ViennaNGS

Latest source code

https://github.com/mtw/Bio-ViennaNGS

Archived source code as at the time of publication

http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15088

License

The Perl 5 License

Acknowledgments

A preprint version of this article can be found on BioRxiv: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/013011

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF projects F43 to MTW, FA and FE) and the Research Platform “Decoding mRNA decay in inflammation” by the University of Vienna to JF.

v1; ref status: approved with reservations 3

References

  • 1. Förstner KU, Vogel J, Sharma CM: READemption-a tool for the computational analysis of deep-sequencing-based transcriptome data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(23):3421–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Breese MR, Liu Y: NGSUtils: a software suite for analyzing and manipulating next-generation sequencing datasets. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(4):494–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, et al. : Simple Combinations of Lineage-Determining Transcription Factors Prime cis-Regulatory Elements Required for Macrophage and B Cell Identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38(4):576–89. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, et al. : Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W: HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stodden V, Leisch F, Peng RD: Implementing Reproducible Research. CRC Press,2014. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, et al. : The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 2002;12(10):1611–8. 10.1101/gr.361602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. : The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kent WJ, Zweig AS, Barber G, et al. : BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(17):2204–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Quinlan AR, Hall IM: BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Raney BJ, Dreszer TR, Barber GP, et al. : Track data hubs enable visualization of user-defined genome-wide annotations on the UCSC Genome Browser. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):1003–1005. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pachter L: Models for transcript quantification from RNA-Seq. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1104.3889. 2011. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li B, Ruotti V, Stewart RM, et al. : RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(4):493–500. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ: Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci. 2012;131(4):281–285. 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hoffmann S, Otto C, Kurtz S, et al. : Fast mapping of short sequences with mismatches, insertions and deletions using index structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(9):e1000502. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hoffmann S, Otto C, Doose G, et al. : A multi-split mapping algorithm for circular, RNA splicing, trans-splicing, and fusion detection. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R34. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL: TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(9):1105–1111. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Amman F, Wolfinger MT, Lorenz R, et al. : TSSAR: TSS annotation regime for dRNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1). 10.1186/1471-2105-15-89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2015 Apr 24. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.6600.r8396

Referee response for version 1

Björn Voß 1

In their manuscript about ViennaNGS the authors describe a set of perl modules and scripts that is useful to build pipelines for NGS data analysis. A key motivation for this is to promote reproducible science, especially with respect to medium-level users, who often create "in-house scripts" for data analysis, which are rarely publicly available. This target community distinguishes ViennaNGS from related approaches, such as Galaxy. The contribution is, thus, relevant and has the potential to serve as a basis for future developments in NGS analysis pipelines. I tested the tutorials and some of the utility scripts and they worked fine. Nevertheless, I think the authors need to clarify some issues and can improve the presentation of their work.

Major Comments:

  • The authors should point out clearly, what distinguishes ViennaNGS from other suites. In the end, they need to convince people to use ViennaNGS. For that  it would be helpful to clearly state what is hard or even impossible to implement in one of the other systems (galaxy, HTSeq, ...) at best with real world examples.

  • As stated in the title the aim of ViennaNGS is to ease the process of building NGS analysis pipelines. Unfortunately, exactly this aspect is more or less not mentioned in the main text. It would be interesting to know, especially for the data analysts with scripting experience, how such a pipeline looks like and why it is easier to build using ViennaNGS.

  • I do not quite understand the explicit discussion of TPM and RPKM. The differences are extensively discussed in Wagner et al. (2012), which the authors can refer to.

  • Similarly, the description of the accompanying utilities in Table 1 is of minor interest. I would suggest to mention them when the corresponding functionality is described in the main text, e.g., assembly_hub_constructor.pl in the paragraph on Visualization. Furthermore, the authors can explain one tool in detail to show how ViennaNGS pipelines are implemented.

  • BioPerl already provides modules to handle Annotation Features (Bio::SeqFeature), which at first glance seem to provide the same functionality as the ViennaNGS feature annotation classes. Why is there a need for an own class?

Minor Comments:

  • An aspect that is becoming more and more important is parallelization. The authors should describe the possibilities of ViennaNGS to be used in cluster or massively parallel environments.

  • The authors should make clear that for some/many tasks they use external tools, such as bedtools2, samtools and tools offered by the UCSC and that the user has to install them on its own. Of course, this is the same as for galaxy and others.

  • I was wondering if ViennaNGS or its pipelines may be integrated into Galaxy. In this way the systems would complement and benefit from each other.

  • At the end of the discussion the authors could provide actual functionalities that they are planning to integrate in the near future. This is interesting for potential users who are missing certain functionalities in the current release. On example is quality control of the raw sequencing data.

  • P.5, Software availability: "at and" --> "and at"

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2015 Apr 23. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.6600.r8057

Referee response for version 1

Brad Chapman 1

The authors describe ViennaNGS, a set of Perl modules and scripts to provide RNA-seq analysis and visualization via UCSC integration. The code is nicely written, open source and easy to install via CPAN with cpanminus. Additionally, the documentation is excellent and contains both high level material in the form of blog posts as well as detailed source code descriptions. In reading the paper I found a few areas that would help improve reader's understanding of the toolbox:

  • Please include additional information about what is unique about ViennaNGS in the introduction. Currently it reads generally and is more about pointing about flaws in other software without saying what ViennaNGS provides. The motivation provides much of this text but it seems out of order relative to the introductory material.

  • Please provide benchmarks on your BAM manipulation tools relative other common tools. I don't think this needs to be extensive, but providing a summary of how they perform on a 100Gb 30x whole human genome sequence would be helpful. For filtering comparisons, I suggest comparing with samtools or sambamba (https://github.com/lomereiter/sambamba). For quality control, comparisons to QualiMap (http://qualimap.bioinfo.cipf.es/) or bamtools (https://github.com/pezmaster31/bamtools) would be helpful.

  • Similarly, it would be great to have benchamrking on annotation and BED manipulation tools in ViennaNGS. How does the functionality and timing compare with bedtools? You require and use bedtools for visualization, and it would be useful to clarify benefits and tradeoffs to using ViennaNGS versus interfacing directly with bedtools.

  • How do you handle testing and validation of ViennaNGS tools and pipelines? I saw new tests for UCSC integration coming in during review, which is great. It would be nice to understand the process by which you ensure new development improves (or at least doesn't degrade) the biological results.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2015 Apr 17. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.6600.r8365

Referee response for version 1

Angelika Merkel 1

The authors present a useful and relevant toolbox for the analysis of NGS data. Its modular design allows for flexibility in the analysis, and the utilization of track hubs for easy exchange of data as well as visualization with popular tools. A nice implementation is the ability to adapt genome annotations of various formats.

Still, I feel the description of the software is rather too general and could be improved.

Major Comments:

The article lacks any benchmarking or presentation of an example analysis, making it difficult to put the software's performance in perspective with any of the  other numerous tools already available. Important for NGS data analysis are specifications for the usage of computational resources (RAM, number of CPUs, processing time, space requirements) and how those scale up with the size of the data set (=number and size of data sets) or type of NGS data (genomic, RNAseq, ChIPseq, Bisulfite-Seq) - all of which are not mentioned. Similarly, the authors do not make any statement on the possibility of parallelization or adaption to cluster infrastructures.

Minor comments:

Although, truly RPKM has been shown to be inappropriate for measuring the relative molar concentration of a RNA species due to normalization by the total number of reads, it is still widely used. Computing RPMK values as well (optionally) as TPM would allow for comparison with other pipelines.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Input data for the ViennaNGS tutorial is available from http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/ViennaNGS


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES