Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Perinatol. 2015 Jul 6;39(4):268–275. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.05.005

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management

Puja K Mehta 1, Margo Minissian 1, C Noel Bairey Merz 1
PMCID: PMC4516636  NIHMSID: NIHMS692264  PMID: 26159741

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading health threat to American women. In addition to established risk factors for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and obesity, adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) including pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational diabetes are now recognized as factors that increase a woman’s risk for future CVD. CVD risk factor burden is disproportionately higher in those of low socioeconomic status and in ethnic/racial minority women. Since younger women often use their obstetrician/gynecologist as their primary health provider, this is an opportune time to diagnose and treat CVD risk factors early. Embedding preventive care providers such as nurse practitioners or physician assistants within OB/GYN practices can be considered, with referral to family medicine or internist for ongoing risk assessment and management. The American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association (ASA) stroke prevention guidelines tailored to women recommend that women with a history of pre-eclampsia be evaluated for hypertension and other CVD risk factors within 6 months to 1 year post-partum. Given the burden and impact of CVD on women our society, the entire medical community must work to establish feasible practice and referral patterns for assessment and treatment of CVD risk factors.

Keywords: women, cardiovascular disease, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading health threat to adult women, killing more women than men annually1. While overall CVD mortality in women has decreased in the prior decade, CVD mortality in younger women is increasing2,3. Furthermore, one in three women in United States dies from CVD, which includes ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension1,4. Greater than 12 million women have diabetes, and obesity is now officially recognized as a disease of epidemic proportions2. CVD risk factor burden is higher in those of low socioeconomic status, and in ethnic/racial minority women1,2. Data from the last AHA survey evaluating national awareness of heart disease among women between 1997 and 2012 showed that while awareness has improved, approximately 56% of women are aware that heart disease is the leading threat to women, and knowledge gaps are particularly prevalent in younger women, those of low socioeconomic status5, Hispanic6, and African American women 7,8.

CVD is a disease of preventable and treatable risk factors, and evidence shows that when guidelines are followed and risk factors appropriately addressed and treated, CVD outcomes improve9,10. Traditional Framingham risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and tobacco continue to be a significant problem; more recently, novel risk factors such as adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs: pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational diabetes) as well as systemic inflammatory disorders (i.e. systemic lupus erythematosis, rheumatoid arthritis) have also been added as CVD risk factors in women2. APOs present as an opportunity to improve a women’s cardiovascular risk profile by identifying women at risk earlier in their health care trajectory. Because women often use their obstetrician-gynecologist as their primary health provider, this is an opportune time to assess for and treat CVD risk factors early (Table 1). Incorporating nurse practitioners or physician assistants within OB/GYN practices can be considered, for ongoing risk assessment for women with a history of APOs, with referral to family medicine or internist as needed. Primary care physicians, obstetrician/gynecologists, and cardiologists must work together to address/incorporate CVD risk assessment in women during routine visits in order to reduce CVD. In this brief report, we will focus on CVD risk factor screening and management for women who have experienced an APO.

Table 1.

CVD Risk Factor Screening in Women with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Time Interval for Screening Post-Partum Time Interval for Subsequent Screening
Hypertension Screen within 6 months to 1 year post-partum21 For SBP 120–139 mm Hg or DBP 80–90 mm Hg: Screen Annually; for BP<120/80: Screen Every 2 years 17,72.
If history of hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, screen annually19
Hyperlipidemia Reasonable to screen within 12 weeks post-partum and post-lactation Screen annually depending on ASCVD risk11
If history of hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, screen annually19
Diabetes Screen within 6 weeks if GDM42,44 If impaired fasting glucose at 6 weeks post-partum, screen annually42.
Screen every 3 years, with more frequent testing depending on risk and if initial screen abnormal73.
If history of hypertensive disorder during pregnancy, screen annually19
Obesity/BMI Screen annually59 Screen annually19,59
Tobacco Use Screen at first post-partum visit49 Screen at each visit50
Nutrition Assess at first post-partum visit Assess at each visit depending on risk53
Physical Activity Assess at first post-partum visit74 Assess at each visit depending on risk53

Cardiac Risk Assessment Update

The 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines regarding assessment of CVD risk recommend that all adults between the ages of 20 and 79 years who do not have known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) should have an assessment of traditional risk factors every 4–6 years11,12. The new guidelines propose the estimation of CVD risk by using a web-based calculator with convenient smart-phone/pad apps that use pooled cohort equations reflective of diverse ethnic populations in United States 12 (Figure 1). The ASCVD risk calculation takes into account age, gender, race (White, African American, or other), total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking status. The score provides an estimate of 10-year CVD risk and a 30-year or life-time risk (including stroke, myocardial infarction, and non-fatal events). A 10-year ACSVD risk score of <7.5% is considered a low risk score while statins are recommended for those with a score of ≥7.5% 12. Per current guidelines, adults between ages of 40–79 years should have a 10-year ASCVD risk score calculated every 4 to 6 years; and for adults between ages of 20 to 39, and those 40 to 59 years old, who are not considered high risk, a 30-year or lifetime ASCVD risk score should be considered to guide management11.

Figure 1. Components of Online Omnibus Calculator for Calculation of ASCVD Risk Score*.

Figure 1

*Entering patient values provides a 10-year and a lifetime risk of ASCVD11,75. AA = African American, F = females, M = males, N = no, WH = White, Y = yes

In cases where further clarification of CVD risk is needed, the guidelines recommend taking into account family history, hs-CRP, coronary calcium scan or obtaining ankle-brachial index (ABI). Carotid intimal media thickness measurement is no longer recommended for routine care11. While coronary artery calcium scanning (CAS) using computed tomography (CT) is useful in intermediate risk women, and very low radiation dose protocols are now available, for young women of child-bearing age with a history of APOs, we recommend use of ASCVD score per guidelines first, and consider hs-CRP or ABI before considering a CAS.

Current Guideline Recommendations

Hypertension

Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999–2008 shows that 8% of women between the ages of 20–44 are hypertensive13. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that every adult over the age of 18 should be screened for hypertension14. The AHA recommends hypertensive screening for every adult over the age of 2015. A diagnosis of hypertension can be made after blood pressure measurements are taken on two separate office visits, with at least three different BP measurements16,17. It is important to use appropriately sized cuff, and BP cuff should be at heart level. The patient should be seated comfortably for at least 5 minutes in a quiet room, with the arm supported horizontally, and with feet on the floor16,17. All adults with hypertension should also be screened for diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use.

In women with high blood pressures pre-pregnancy, the JNC 8 hypertension guidelines for anti-hypertensive treatment should be followed to a goal of less than 140/90 mm Hg18. Guidelines note that if BP goal is not achieved in one month, the dose of anti-hypertensive should be increased or a second class of anti-hypertensive added to achieve goal BP. In women of childbearing age who are planning to conceive, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), aldosterone receptor antagonists, and direct renin inhibitors should be used with caution and avoided when possible, in light of the fact that many pregnancies are not planned.

For hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, the ACOG guidelines developed by the task force on hypertension should be followed19. For treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy ACOG strongly recommends alpha-beta blocker labetalol, nifedipine, or methyldopa above all others; ACE-I, ARBs, aldosterone receptor antagonists, and renin inhibitors are not recommended due to their teratogenic effects of blocking the renin-angiotensin system20,21. Atenolol is not recommended during pregnancy because of adverse impact on fetal growth22, and thiazide diuretics and hydralazine are also not recommended. Anti-hypertensive drug use recommendations during pregnancy and side effects, as well as level of evidence, are summarized in the new AHA/ASA guidelines for the prevention of stoke in women21 and they are similar to the ACOG guidelines, except they also gave beta-blockers such as pindolol and metoprolol a class IIa indication for use to treat hypertension in pregnancy.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in women and more strokes occur in women compared to men21. Given that a history of preeclampsia is associated with an increased future stroke risk, these new guidelines recommend that women with a history of preeclampsia should be evaluated and treated of CVD risk factors within 6 months to 1 year of giving birth21.

Hypertension that persists 3 months post-partum is defined as chronic hypertension23. Non-pharmacologic recommendations to lower blood pressure include reduction of dietary sodium intake, increased physical activity, potassium supplementation in those with low potassium, reduction of alcohol intake, and stress management. In women under the age of 30, if blood pressure remains elevated in the office despite anti-hypertensive drug therapy, secondary causes of hypertension should be considered, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, oral contraceptive pills, obstructive sleep apnea, renal artery stenosis, coarctation, or hyperaldosteronism. The JNC 8 guidelines has evidence-based dosing for anti-hypertensive mediations that can be used 18. The ACOG guidelines also recommend yearly BP, lipid, glucose, and BMI assessment for women with a history of pre-eclampsia, while acknowledging that the quality of evidence for this recommendation is low 19.

Lactation and Anti-Hypertensives

Due to concern about using anti-hypertensives during lactation, physicians and patients are often reluctant to start anti-hypertensive medications Physicians should not withhold treatment of hypertension in lactating mothers, as there are many anti-hypertensives that are compatible with breast feeding24. Ghanem et al. have summarized the data in a review in Cardiovascular Therapeutics on the use of anti-hypertensive drugs during pregnancy and lactation 25. While beta-blockers, ACE-I, thiazides, and calcium channel blockers are all secreted in breast milk, atenolol and clonidine concentrate in breast milk and should be used with caution. Even though data on the use of commonly prescribed dihydropyridine and non-dihydropiridine CCBs lacks in pregnancy, CCBs such as amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil can be effective in the treatment of hypertension in non-pregnant women. Their use is often limited by the side effect of mild dependent edema that resolves with continual use.

It should be noted that oral contraceptives can also have mild effects of raising blood pressure, and BP should be measured prior to initiating OCPs. Newer fourth generation OCPs can have BP lowering effects due to their anti-estrogenic, diuretic effects, however, have higher rates of venous-thrombo-embolism than third-generation OCPs26. In addition, women who have migraines with aura, are obese, diabetic, or smoking on OCPs should be counseled regarding increased risk of stroke and thromboembolism21,27,28.

Hyperlipidemia

Hyperlipidemia prior to pregnancy has been associated with APOs such as preterm delivery 2932. Although cholesterol levels are often elevated during pregnancy, cholesterol is generally not evaluated or treated. A study by Bartels et al. confirmed that cholesterol levels elevate beginning in the first trimester and continue throughout pregnancy 33. It is not clearly established at what point after delivery should cholesterol levels be measured in women, but measurement at least 12 weeks post-partum and post-lactation cessation seems reasonable.

While no specific guidelines exist for cholesterol screening in women with a history of APOs, the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines regarding assessment of CVD risk recommend discussion of initiation of statin in those with a score of ≥7.5% 12, and consideration of additional testing in scores of 5–7.5%, including additional blood work such as hsCRP. If a woman of child-bearing age is on a statin, she should be counseled regarding the fetal risk of statins, and statin must be discontinued in the event of pregnancy. It should be noted that estrogen containing oral contraceptives can also have a mild effect on cholesterol levels26, resulting in a small increase in LDL and a reduction in HDL, although progestin-only oral contraceptives do not appear to significant effects on lipid profile, and OCPs can be used in patients with controlled dyslipidemia26.

Non-HDL cholesterol level and triglycerides can also be considered when assessing a women’s CVD risk. Women with pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia have higher rates of hypertriglyceridemia, impaired blood glucose and metabolic syndrome up to 2.5 years after delivery30,34. While some studies have highlighted the importance of measuring LDL fractionation and determining APO B levels in addition to routine lipid panel to assess risk, current guidelines do not recommend this for routine clinical care due to lack of randomized controlled trials at this time that such additional testing is beneficial 12.

Diabetes

Diabetes is considered a coronary heart disease risk equivalent, and is a much stronger risk factor for women compared to men 35,36. Over 12 million American women are currently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; This is mostly likely attributable to the incline in obesity amongst Americans37. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of future development of diabetes by 7-fold compared to those with no history of GDM38. GDM also increases the risk of pre-eclampsia39, and is associated with adverse CVD outcomes later in life40. Even in the absence of GDM, a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia increases the risk of development of diabetes later in life41. If a woman develops GDM, she should be re-assessed after 6 weeks to ensure that her glucose levels have returned to normal, and if impaired fasting glucose, she should be screened annually for diabetes 42. The Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on diabetes and pregnancy recommend that women with diabetes who are requiring metformin or glyburide should continue these medications while breastfeeding43. ACOG recommends post-partum glucose check at 6–12 weeks, and those who are found to have impaired fasting glucose or diabetes should be referred for treatment 44. One study has shown that less than half of women diagnosed with GDM were tested for diabetes postpartum, and postpartum testing was strongly associated with postpartum visit attendance. 54% of women who kept following up appointment were tested compared to 17% of women who did not keep their appointment 45. If glucose levels have normalized at the post-partum visit, the American Diabetic Association (ADA) recommends that these women should be screened with oral glucose tolerance test at 1 year, and then at least every 3 years for diabetes46.

Tobacco Use

Smoking is the first and foremost avoidable cause of disease and death in the United States. Maternal smoking has multiple health consequences for both the mother and fetus including preterm birth, low birth weight and still birth 47. Screening for tobacco use and exposure should be assessed in all patients at every visit 48. Screening for tobacco smoking is also recommended during pregnancy and at the first post-partum visit49,50. If a woman is actively smoking, the provider should seek to see if she is willing to consider quitting and help her establish a plan and a quit date 51.

Physical Activity/Nutrition

The updated ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines on prevention made changes to their recommendations to focus primarily to lower LDL cholesterol and blood pressure. The new recommendations suggest physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity 3–4 days per week for 40 minutes to both lower LDL and lower blood pressure 52. Addressing physical activity at every follow-up visit is reasonable 53 although women are tired of newborn care and may have no time to exercise, physical fitness is linked to improved CVD outcomes and longevity5355. Clinicians can encourage patients to monitor daily exercise by wearing a personal activity tracker such as a pedometer. A commonly accepted goal is 10,000 steps/day 56.

Updated nutrition recommendations are similar to both lipid lowering and lowering blood pressure. Clinicians should suggest a Mediterranean based diet that promotes vegetables and fruit, whole grains, low fat dairy products, poultry, fish, legumes, non-tropical oils, and nuts. Daily nutrition intake should aim to achieve no more than 5–6% of calories from saturated fat. It is important for individuals to tailor their nutrition based on their cultural preferences while adapting their nutritional regimen to caloric requirements 52. The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) is a proven regimen to assist individuals in lowering blood pressure57. In addition to the DASH eating regimen, sodium restriction should be limited to no more than 2300 mg daily58.

Overweight and Obesity

The updated 2013 guidelines by the ACC/AHA/The Obesity Society recommend screening for obesity with a calculation of body mass index (BMI) at least annually in all adults59. Over one-third of American women are obese60, and BMI is also a strong predictor of all-cause mortality61,62. Individuals are considered overweight if their BMI is over 25 kg/m2, and obesity is defined as a BMI >30 kg/m2 63. However, the definition of overweight and obesity differs based on ethnicity, with Asians classified as overweight with BMI >23 kg/m2 and as obese at BMI >25 kg/m2. Evaluation of pre-pregnancy BMI to identify those women who are potentially at risk, and then annual screening as per guidelines is recommended59. In recently published Danish cohort study of young women (median age 30 years old) who were followed for 4.5 years, pre-pregnancy obesity was associated with an adverse risk of stroke and myocardial infarction 64. Similar to a higher prevalence of CVD risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and tobacco use in those of lower socioeconomic status, women who are less educated and have lower income are also more likely to be obese5,65,66. An emphasis on modest weight loss of 3–5% provides clinical benefit. Furthermore, the more weight that is lost, the greater the health benefits 63. Suggested caloric restrictions include 1200 to 1500 kcal per day for women. This should provide a 500 calorie per day energy deficit. Food to avoid should be those that are high in carbohydrates, low in fiber and high in saturated fats. For patients that are morbidly obese and have not responded to conventional weight loss strategies, the provider should discuss and recommend a consultation regarding risk vs. benefit of bariatric surgery 63.

Knowledge Gaps

Mosca et al. have demonstrated that physician awareness of CVD prevention guidelines was significantly lower among ob-gyns in a survey of primary care physicians, ob-gyns, and cardiologista 67. Furthermore, incorporation of CVD prevention guidelines was under 55% and equally poor among all three groups 67. A recent survey designed to assess physician knowledge of pre-eclampsia-associated increased CVD risk demonstrated that less than 10% of internists and 38% of ob-gyns counseled patients with a history of pre-eclampsia regarding their future CVD risk68.

There are no outcome-based clinical trials that show whether primordial CVD prevention with anti-atherosclerotic strategies (such as aspirin or statins) in women who experience an APO changes future adverse CVD outcomes. The traditional Framingham Risk score has been shown to underestimate risk in women, and while the new ASCVD risk score improves on this estimation as it is sex-specific, currently there are no risk scores that incorporate APOs in calculation of woman’s risk of CVD69,70. The extent to which incorporation of APOs would reclassify women from low to intermediate risk, or intermediate to high risk is unknown; the study is ongoing in this area71.

Conclusions

Given the significant amount of literature now that shows that APOs such as pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and pre-term delivery lead to increased risk of future CVD events, it becomes imperative to assess CVD risk in women of child-bearing age, and treat CVD risk factors based on ACC/AHA guidelines. The entire medical community, including primary care physicians, obstetricians and gynecologists, cardiologists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants must come together and establish easy referral patterns so that routine assessments of CVD risk factors such as blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, diabetes, tobacco use, nutrition, and physical activity are made. Embedding preventive care providers such as nurse practitioners or physician assistants within OB/GYN practices can be considered, with referral to family medicine or internist for ongoing risk assessment and management. CVD risk factor screening and education CVD risk factor education for women, especially in those of low socioeconomic status and ethnic minority women should also be a priority. Research regarding the additive value of incorporating APOs into CV risk scores and the utility of early preventive care is ongoing.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, nos. N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164, grants K23HL105787, U0164829, U01 HL649141, U01 HL649241, T32HL69751, R01-HL090957, 1R03AG032631 from the National Institute on Aging, GCRC grant MO1-RR00425 from the National Center for Research Resources and grants from the Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Danville, NJ, The Women’s Guild of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, The Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA, and QMED, Inc., Laurence Harbor, NJ, the Edythe L. Broad Women’s Heart Research Fellowship, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, the Barbra Streisand Women’s Cardiovascular Research and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR), Washington, D.C., and the Linda Joy Pollin Women’s Heart Health Program.

Abbreviations

ABI

Ankle-brachial index

ACE-Is

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

ACOG, AHA

American Heart Association

APOs

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

ARBs

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

ASA

American Stroke Association

ASCVD

Atherosclertic Cardiovascular Disease

BMI

Body Mass Index

CVD

Cardiovascular Disease

CCBs

Calcium Channel Blockers

DASH

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension

GDM

gestational diabetes mellitus

HDL

High Density Lipoprotein

hs-CRP

High Sensitive C-Reactive Protein

IHD

Ischemic Heart Disease

JNC

Joint National Committee

LDL

Low Density Lipoprotein

MI

Myocardial Infarction

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OCPs

Oral Contraceptive Pills

TC

High Total Cholesterol

TRG

High Triglycerides

USPSTF

United States Preventive Services Task Force

Footnotes

Disclosures: Mehta: Research support – Gilead, General Electric, NIH, CTSI. Lectures (paid to CSMC) – Medical Education Speakers Network; Minissian: Research support - Gilead; Bairey Merz: CME Lectures (paid to CSMC) – Mayo Foundation, Bryn Mawr, Practice Point Communications, Allegheny General Hospital, Gilead (grant review committee), Duke, Japanese Circ Society, UCSF, Vox Media, Emory, PCNA, Kaiser Permanente, Garden State, AHA. Honorarium and Consulting (paid to NBM) - Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, University of New Mexico, NIH-SEP (grant review study section), Research Triangle Institute International. Research support – NIH, Gilead, CTSI, FAMRI.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28–e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association. Circulation. 2011 Mar 22;123(11):1243–1262. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ford ES, Capewell S. Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in the U.S. from 1980 through 2002: concealed leveling of mortality rates. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007 Nov 27;50(22):2128–2132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Compressed Mortality File 1999–2010. WONDER Online Database. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2009 Nov;6(11):712–722. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaplan RC, Aviles-Santa ML, Parrinello CM, et al. Body mass index, sex, and cardiovascular disease risk factors among hispanic/latino adults: Hispanic community health study/study of latinos. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014;3(4) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mosca L, Hammond G, Mochari-Greenberger H, et al. Fifteen-year trends in awareness of heart disease in women: results of a 2012 American Heart Association national survey. Circulation. 2013 Mar 19;127(11):1254–1263. e1251–1229. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318287cf2f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mosca L, Mochari-Greenberger H, Dolor RJ, Newby LK, Robb KJ. Twelve-year follow-up of American women’s awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):120–127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.915538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ellrodt AG, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, et al. Synthesizing lessons learned from get with the guidelines: the value of disease-based registries in improving quality and outcomes. Circulation. 2013 Nov 26;128(22):2447–2460. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000435779.48007.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Micieli G, Cavallini A, Quaglini S Guideline Application for Decision Making in Ischemic Stroke Study G. Guideline compliance improves stroke outcome: a preliminary study in 4 districts in the Italian region of Lombardia. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2002 May;33(5):1341–1347. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000013663.27776.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goff DC, Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013 Nov 12; [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 Nov 7; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bateman BT, Shaw KM, Kuklina EV, Callaghan WM, Seely EW, Hernandez-Diaz S. Hypertension in women of reproductive age in the United States: NHANES 1999–2008. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e36171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Force USPST. Screening for high blood pressure: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147(11):783–786. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, et al. AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Circulation. 2002 Jul 16;106(3):388–391. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020190.45892.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans: an AHA scientific statement from the Council on High Blood Pressure Research Professional and Public Education Subcommittee. Journal of clinical hypertension. 2005 Feb;7(2):102–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04377.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lenfant C, Chobanian AV, Jones DW, Roccella EJ Joint National Committee on the Prevention DE, Treatment of High Blood P. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7): resetting the hypertension sails. Hypertension. 2003 Jun;41(6):1178–1179. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000075790.33892.AE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507–520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American College of O, Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in P. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122–1131. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Buttar HS. An overview of the influence of ACE inhibitors on fetal-placental circulation and perinatal development. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 1997 Nov;176(1–2):61–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2014 May;45(5):1545–1588. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000442009.06663.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lydakis C, Lip GY, Beevers M, Beevers DG. Atenolol and fetal growth in pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jun;12(6):541–547. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00031-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Podymow T, August P. Postpartum course of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension in pregnancy: official journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2010;29(3):294–300. doi: 10.3109/10641950902777747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beardmore KS, Morris JM, Gallery ED. Excretion of antihypertensive medication into human breast milk: a systematic review. Hypertension in pregnancy: official journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2002;21(1):85–95. doi: 10.1081/PRG-120002912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ghanem FA, Movahed A. Use of antihypertensive drugs during pregnancy and lactation. Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2008 Spring;26(1):38–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shufelt CL, Bairey Merz CN. Contraceptive hormone use and cardiovascular disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009 Jan 20;53(3):221–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Farley TM, Meirik O, Chang CL, Poulter NR. Combined oral contraceptives, smoking, and cardiovascular risk. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Dec;52(12):775–785. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.12.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.MacClellan LR, Giles W, Cole J, et al. Probable migraine with visual aura and risk of ischemic stroke: the stroke prevention in young women study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2007 Sep;38(9):2438–2445. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mudd LM, Holzman CB, Catov JM, Senagore PK, Evans RW. Maternal lipids at mid-pregnancy and the risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Jun;91(6):726–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01391.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Lund-Nilsen TI, Salvesen KA, Davey Smith G, Romundstad PR. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of pre-eclampsia. Bmj. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):978. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39366.416817.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Catov JM, Bodnar LM, Kip KE, et al. Early pregnancy lipid concentrations and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:610 e611–617. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.024. United States. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Catov JM, Bodnar LM, Ness RB, Barron SJ, Roberts JM. Inflammation and dyslipidemia related to risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1312–1319. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm273. United States. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bartels A, Egan N, Broadhurst DI, et al. Maternal serum cholesterol levels are elevated from the 1st trimester of pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Nov;32(8):747–752. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.714017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hermes W, Franx A, van Pampus MG, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in women who had hypertensive disorders late in pregnancy: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;208(6):474, e471–478. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hu G, Jousilahti P, Qiao Q, Peltonen M, Katoh S, Tuomilehto J. The gender-specific impact of diabetes and myocardial infarction at baseline and during follow-up on mortality from all causes and coronary heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005 May 3;45(9):1413–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. Bmj. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):73–78. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.389583.7C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1404–1423. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005. United States. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1773–1779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yogev Y, Xenakis EM, Langer O. The association between preeclampsia and the severity of gestational diabetes: the impact of glycemic control. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2004 Nov;191(5):1655–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wenger NK. Recognizing pregnancy-associated cardiovascular risk factors. The American journal of cardiology. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):406–409. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carr DB, Newton KM, Utzschneider KM, et al. Preeclampsia and risk of developing subsequent diabetes. Hypertension in pregnancy: official journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2009 Aug;28(4):435–447. doi: 10.3109/10641950802629675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Expert Committee on the D, Classification of Diabetes M. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes care. 2003 Jan;26(Suppl 1):S5–20. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Blumer I, Hadar E, Hadden DR, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;98(11):4227–4249. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Committee on Practice B-O. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):406–416. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Russell MA, Phipps MG, Olson CL, Welch HG, Carpenter MW. Rates of postpartum glucose testing after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006 Dec;108(6):1456–1462. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245446.85868.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes care. 2007 Jul;30(Suppl 2):S251–260. doi: 10.2337/dc07-s225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Services USDoHaH. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the surgeon general: Secondhand smoke: What it means to you. Atlanta Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smith SC, Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011 Nov 29;58(23):2432–2446. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Committee opinion no. 471: Smoking cessation during pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 Nov;116(5):1241–1244. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182004fcd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Counseling and Interventions to Prevent Tobacco Use and Tobacco-Caused Disease in Adults and Pregnant Women: Clinical Summary. 2009 Apr; AHRQ Publication No. 09-05131-EF-2. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf09/tobacco/tobaccosum2.htm.
  • 51.Smith SC, Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2458–2473. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318235eb4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 7; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S76–99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW, 3rd, Haskell W, Lee IM. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011 Aug 16;124(7):789–795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shiroma EJ, Lee IM. Physical activity and cardiovascular health: lessons learned from epidemiological studies across age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Circulation. 2010 Aug 17;122(7):743–752. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wenger NK. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Highlights for the Clinician of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Mar 14; doi: 10.1002/clc.22264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. The New England journal of medicine. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1117–1124. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bibbins-Domingo K. The institute of medicine report sodium intake in populations: assessment of evidence: summary of primary findings and implications for clinicians. JAMA internal medicine. 2014 Jan;174(1):136–137. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2013 Nov 12; [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):235–241. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Prospective Studies C. Whitlock G, Lewington S, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009 Mar 28;373(9669):1083–1096. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wenger NK. Prevention of cardiovascular disease: highlights for the clinician of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Clinical cardiology. 2014 Apr;37(4):239–251. doi: 10.1002/clc.22264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 7; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schmiegelow MD, Andersson C, Kober L, et al. Prepregnancy obesity and associations with stroke and myocardial infarction in women in the years after childbirth: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):330–337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Buring J, Ridker PM. Impact of traditional and novel risk factors on the relationship between socioeconomic status and incident cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2619–2626. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.660043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jeffery RW, Forster JL, Folsom AR, Luepker RV, Jacobs DR, Jr, Blackburn H. The relationship between social status and body mass index in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. International journal of obesity. 1989;13(1):59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mosca L, Linfante AH, Benjamin EJ, et al. National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):499–510. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154568.43333.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Young B, Hacker MR, Rana S. Physicians’ knowledge of future vascular disease in women with preeclampsia. Hypertension in pregnancy: official journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. 2012;31(1):50–58. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2010.544955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pasternak RC, Abrams J, Greenland P, Smaha LA, Wilson PW, Houston-Miller N. 34th Bethesda Conference: Task force #1--Identification of coronary heart disease risk: is there a detection gap? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003 Jun 4;41(11):1863–1874. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N, Cook NR. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2007 Feb 14;297(6):611–619. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.6.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stuart JJ, Bairey Merz CN, Berga SL, et al. Maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013 Jan;22(1):37–47. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Screening for High Blood Pressure: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:783–786. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes care. 2014 Jan;37(Suppl 1):S5–13. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Artal R, O’Toole M. Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Br J Sports Med. 2003 Feb;37(1):6–12. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.6. discussion 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013 Nov 12; [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES