Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosurgery. 2011 Jul;69(1):38–44. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182134171

Table 3.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes between the durotomy and no durotomy groups.

Outcome No durotomy (n=371) Durotomy (n=38) p-value
Postoperative complications
    Nerve root injury 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
    Wound hematoma 4 (1%) 0 (0%) 0.81
    Wound Infection 7 (2%) 2 (5%) 0.43
    Other 20 (5%) 4 (11%) 0.34
    None 325 (88%) 29 (78%) 0.15
Post-operative mortality (death within 6 weeks of surgery) 1 (0.2%) 0 (0%)
Post-operative mortality (death within 3 months of surgery) 1 (0.2%) 0 (0%)
Additional surgeries (1-year rate) 20 (5%) 1 (3%) 0.461
Additional surgeries (2-year rate) 28 (8%) 3 (8%) 0.959
Additional surgeries (3-year rate) 41 (11%) 3 (8%) 0.554
Additional surgeries (4-year rate) 49 (13%) 3 (8%) 0.363
    Recurrent stenosis/progressive lesthesis 22 (6%) 1 (3%)
    Pseudoarthrosis/fusion exploration 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
    Complication or Other 15 (4.1%) 2 (5.3%)
    New Condition 7 (1.9%) 1

* Surgical information was available for 371 non-durotomy and 38 durotomy patients.

Complications or events occurring up to 8 weeks after surgery are listed. There were no reported cases of bone-graft complication, cerebrospinal fluid leak, paralysis, cauda equina injury or pseudarthrosis.

Rates of repeated surgery at 1, 2,3,and 4 years are Kaplan-Meier estimates. P values were calculated with the use of the log-rank test. Numbers and percentages are based on the first additional surgery if more than one additional surgery.