Sub-optimal responses to ivermectin (IVM) have emerged. Targeting the Onchocerca volvulus Wolbachia endosymbionts with doxycycline is effective in clearing microfilariae in onchocerciasis patients with persistent microfilaridermia and in enhanced killing of adult worms after repeated standard IVM treatment.
Keywords: doxycycline, Onchocerca volvulus, suboptimal response, ivermectin, Wolbachia
Abstract
Background. Ivermectin (IVM) has been the drug of choice for the treatment of onchocerciasis. However, there have been reports of persistent microfilaridermia in individuals from an endemic area in Ghana after many rounds of IVM, raising concerns of suboptimal response or even the emergence of drug resistance. Because it is considered risky to continue relying only on IVM to combat this phenomenon, we assessed the effect of targeting the Onchocerca volvulus Wolbachia endosymbionts with doxycycline for these individuals with suboptimal response.
Methods. One hundred sixty-seven patients, most of them with multiple rounds of IVM, were recruited in areas with IVM suboptimal response and treated with 100 mg/day doxycycline for 6 weeks. Three and 12 months after doxycycline treatment, patients took part in standard IVM treatment.
Results. At 20 months after treatment, 80% of living female worms from the placebo group were Wolbachia positive, whereas only 5.1% in the doxycycline-treated group contained bacteria. Consistent with interruption of embryogenesis, none of the nodules removed from doxycycline-treated patients contained microfilariae, and 97% of those patients were without microfilaridermia, in contrast to placebo patients who remained at pretreatment levels (P < .001). Moreover, a significantly enhanced number of dead worms were observed after doxycycline.
Conclusions. Targeting the Wolbachia in O. volvulus is effective in clearing microfilariae in the skin of onchocerciasis patients with persistent microfilaridermia and in enhanced killing of adult worms after repeated standard IVM treatment. Strategies can now be developed that include doxycycline to control onchocerciasis in areas where infections persist despite the frequent use of IVM.
Clinical Trials Registration. ISRCTN 66649839.
Onchocerciasis affects >37 million people and remains a significant public health burden in developing countries [1, 2]. This infection is caused by the filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus, residing in subcutaneous nodules where they produce millions of microfilariae (Mf) during their average life span of 10 years [3, 4]. The Mf migrate through the skin and eyes and are responsible for disease, such as dermatitis and visual impairment.
The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC) relies on ivermectin (IVM) mass drug administration (MDA). However, the use of a single drug, of which more than a billion doses could potentially be needed for disease elimination [5], has raised concerns that adaptation of the parasites or the hosts [6], a reduction in effectiveness of the drug, or even drug resistance might occur and impair the success of the control programs. Resistance has occurred in several veterinary parasitic nematodes [7], and treatment failures have been suspected in other human helminthic infections [8–10].
In 2004, suboptimal response (SOR) to IVM was reported in onchocerciasis-endemic populations in communities of the Brong-Ahafo Region of Ghana [11, 12] with significant microfilaridermia despite a history of multiple (up to 14) MDAs with IVM. This indicates a considerable risk in continuing to rely on only increased IVM interventions [13]. A better intervention could be a chemotherapy leading to adulticidal or long-term sterilizing effects on the worms, at best with an already registered, repurposed drug.
Recently, our group has developed macrofilaricidal and long-term-sterilizing regimens based on the depletion of Wolbachia endosymbionts from O. volvulus. We demonstrated that doxycycline given at 100 mg/day for 5 or 6 weeks leads to a complete and irreversible (>2 years) sterilization of adult female worms. There is also a macrofilaricidal effect that can be first observed with 100 mg/day treatment by 5 weeks [14] and that seems to be more pronounced when doxycycline is administered at 200 mg/day [15].
Doxycycline is an antifilarial treatment that is more effective than the standard MDA regimen and is available to treat individual patients [16]. To formally prove the suitability of doxycycline in areas where MDA with IVM shows suboptimal performance, we carried out a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study with 100 mg/day doxycycline administered for 6 weeks to patients with onchocerciasis in an area with multiple documented rounds of IVM treatment.
METHODS
Study Population and Area, Subject Eligibility, and Selection
The study was undertaken in 13 onchocerciasis-endemic communities located along the Pru, Lower Black Volta, and Tain river basins in the Brong-Ahafo Region of Ghana and includes communities where IVM SOR was reported [17, 18]. This study was approved by the Committee on Human Research, Publications and Ethics of the School of Medical Sciences of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, and is registered at Current Controlled Trials (www.isrctn.com, identifier 66649839).
Volunteers were screened using the Onchocerciasis Control Programme registration books in combination with questionnaires to select those having microfilariae in the skin despite multiple previous treatments, and/or reappearance of palpable nodules [12]. Eligible volunteers had taken on average 10 rounds of IVM and 86% of the study participants had received ≥7 rounds (Table 1). Eligible participants were nodule carriers aged 18–50 years, >40 kg body weight, in good health, and without clinical conditions requiring chronic medication. Hepatic and renal functions as well as pregnancy tests were assessed by dipstick chemistry using venous blood and urine. Skin snips (biopsies) were taken to determine skin microfilarial loads. Exclusion criteria were abnormal hepatic and renal enzymes, pregnancy, breastfeeding, intolerance to doxycycline, alcohol or drug abuse, history of tuberculosis, glucose in urine, hypertension, or history of any condition requiring long-term medication (see also ISRCTN registry).
Table 1.
Characteristic | Treatment |
||
---|---|---|---|
Doxycycline | Placebo | P Value | |
No. of patients | 84 | 83 | |
Age, y | P = .004a | ||
Mean ± SD | 35.45 ± 9.46 | 39.60 ± 9.08 | |
Weight, kg | P = .079a | ||
Mean ± SD | 59.44 ± 8.25 | 57.23 ± 7.89 | |
Sex, No. | P = .289b | ||
Female | 18 (21.4%) | 24 (28.9%) | |
Male | 66 (78.6%) | 59 (71.1%) | |
IVM rounds | P = .461c | ||
Mean ± SD | 10.40 ± 3.52 | 10.72 ± 3.36 | |
Min–Max | 4–17 | 0–17 | |
Median | 10 | 10 | |
25th, 75th percentiles | 7.0, 13.8 | 9.0, 13.0 | |
No. of rounds | |||
0 | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
4 | 3 (3.6%) | 2 (2.4%) | |
5 | 3 (3.6%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
6 | 8 (9.5%) | 4 (4.8%) | |
7 | 8 (9.5%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
8 | 3 (3.6%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
9 | 10 (11.9%) | 8 (9.6%) | |
10 | 9 (10.7%) | 18 (21.7%) | |
11 | 9 (10.7%) | 11 (13.3%) | |
12 | 8 (9.5%) | 7 (8.4%) | |
13 | 2 (2.4%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
14 | 7 (8.3%) | 7 (8.4%) | |
15 | 8 (9.5%) | 8 (9.6%) | |
16 | 2 (2.4%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
17 | 4 (4.8%) | 4 (4.8%) | |
No. of palpated nodules | P = .279c | ||
Total No. | 206 | 198 | |
Mean ± SD | 2.45 ± 1.41 | 2.39 ± 1.79 | |
Median | 2 | 2 | |
No. of palpated sites | P = .339c | ||
Total No. | 136 | 127 | |
Mean ± SD | 1.62 ± 0.79 | 1.53 ± 0.80 | |
Median | 1 | 1 |
Abbreviations: IVM, ivermectin; SD, standard deviation.
a Student t test.
b Fisher exact test.
c Mann–Whitney U test.
Study Design, Randomization, and Interventions
The primary objective of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was to assess the macrofilaricidal or sterilizing effect of doxycycline on adult female O. volvulus worms. Sample size was calculated based on the proportion of dead female O. volvulus worms observed in a previous study on doxycycline treatment [15]. Assuming a rate of 30% of patients with dead female worms in the placebo group and a rate of 62% in the doxycycline group, Fisher exact test (2-sided) at the level of α = 5% had a power of at least 90% with a sample size of 55 patients per study group. Allowing a dropout rate of 33%, the total number of patients per treatment arm was 83 individuals. To assure an equal distribution of Mf-positive and Mf-negative individuals to the treatment groups, eligible patients were randomized separately according to their Mf status by computer-generated random allocation sequence.
Participants received 100 mg doxycycline (Doxydoc) or matching placebo per day for 6 weeks under daily observation. Participants were instructed to continue participating in the ongoing MDA at 3 and 13 months after treatment. After study completion, doxycycline was offered to all placebo group participants and the Mf-positive patients from the doxycycline group.
Nodule Mapping
The palpable nodules were mapped at study entry and at 20 months immediately prior to operation; the locations were assigned to a standardized system (head, shoulder, thorax, iliac crest, trochanter, os sacrum, knees). At 20 months, all palpable nodules were removed from the available patients.
Laboratory Procedures
Skin Mf were assessed before and at 12 and 20 months after treatment onset. Two skin biopsies of 1–3 mg were taken from the buttocks and prepared for microscopic examination, as described previously [15].
Nodules were fixed in 80% ethanol and embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Gomori method for iron, or immunostained against Dirofilaria immitis Wolbachia surface protein (Diwsp) and cathepsin D–like lysosomal aspartic protease of O. volvulus [15]. At least 8 sections across the nodules were histologically assessed. Worms that had been acquired after treatment according to the definition described previously [4] were subtracted from all analyses. Worms were classified as newly acquired, young, middle-aged, or old [19]. Sections were assessed independently by 2 experienced parasitologists (S. S., C. D. M.).
Statistical Methods
Differences between the 2 treatment groups were analyzed with Student t test for quantitative parametric and the Mann–Whitney U test for all other nonparametric variables. Fisher exact test was used to compare binary qualitative variables and the Spearman rank correlation for comparisons of 2 quantitative parameters. Quantitative baseline values were compared to follow-up values using the sign test. Histological results were tested on single worm and on patient levels using the Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative and Fisher exact test for qualitative data. In addition, regression analyses were performed using alternating logistic regression, as implemented in the SAS procedure Genmod. This procedure allows testing for a potential dependency between the worms in 1 patient. Four data sets (per protocol [PP]; intention to treat [ITT]; treatment-PP; treatment and IVM-PP) were used to analyze the data and are explained in the relevant tables. Analyses were done using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 22; Armonk, New York) and SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina).
RESULTS
Participant Flow and Adverse Reactions
The trial profile of the study is illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1. In all, 167 volunteers were enrolled and subsequently randomized into the treatment arms. Baseline data are given in Table 1. Importantly, 86% of study participants had taken ≥7 rounds of IVM (average 10 rounds). Statistical analysis showed that not only the Mf positivity (P = .86; ITT) but also the intensity of microfilaridermia (Mf/mg skin; P = .35; ITT) was independent of the IVM intake, consistent with the finding of suboptimal responses to IVM. Adherence to treatment was generally high. Doxycycline was well tolerated, with only mild adverse reactions (ARs) encountered (Supplementary Table 1). Twenty individuals (13 doxycycline, 7 placebo) did not complete the treatment course. Eleven patients (7 doxycycline, 4 placebo) dropped out because they reported ARs, such as diarrhea and vomiting, that the code-blinded medical doctors could not exclude from being potentially related to drug intake; all the other reasons for incompletion were reported as not drug-related. There was no significant difference in the number of ARs or in the types of ARs between the 2 treatment groups, except for nausea (grade 1), a common AR due to doxycycline intake.
Sustained Reduction of Microfilarial Skin Loads in the Doxycycline Group
At baseline, there was no significant difference in the microfilarial load (median Mf/mg skin) between treatment groups (Table 2, all cohorts). However, at 12 months, a significant difference appeared (P < .001), with the doxycycline group showing medians of 0, whereas the placebo group's medians increased throughout all cohorts. This difference was maintained at 20 months after treatment (P < .001).
Table 2.
Study Time Point | ITT (n = 167) |
Treatment-PP (n = 147) |
Treatment and-IVM-PP (n = 87) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | |
Baseline | ||||||
Mf positive | 47/84 (56.0%) | 48/83 (57.8%) | 40/71 (56.3%) | 43/76 (56.6%) | 20/42 (47.6%) | 23/45 (51.1%) |
P valueb | P = .876 | P = 1.0 | P = .831 | |||
Mean ± SD | 2.30 ± 6.29 | 3.23 ± 8.69 | 1.90 ± 4.35 | 3.46 ± 9.05 | 0.84 ± 2.66 | 3.27 ± 10.51 |
GMc | 0.78 | 1.03 | 0.75 | 1.08 | 0.4 | 0.82 |
Min–Max | 0–45.62 | 0–65.99 | 0–24.87 | 0–65.99 | 0–17.02 | 0–65.99 |
Median | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0 | 0.13 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 1.11 | 0, 1.94 | 0, 1.11 | 0, 2.00 | 0, 0.63 | 0, 0.97 |
P valued | P = .495 | P = .544 | P = .498 | |||
12 mo | ||||||
Mf positive | 8/73 (11.0%) | 44/72 (61.1%) | 7/69 (10.1%) | 42/70 (60.0%) | 1/40 (2.5%) | 24/44 (54.5%) |
P valueb | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | |||
Mean ± SD | 0.87 ± 3.74 | 4.50 ± 8.11 | 0.90 ± 3.85 | 4.33 ± 8.10 | 0.70 ± 4.43 | 4.01 ± 7.24 |
GMc | 0.21 | 1.68 | 0.21 | 1.58 | 0.09 | 1.47 |
Min–Max | 0–28.00 | 0–38.63 | 0–28.00 | 0–38.63 | 0–28.00 | 0–33.86 |
Median | 0 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.52 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 0 | 0, 4.50 | 0, 0 | 0, 4.11 | 0, 0 | 0, 5.71 |
P valued | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | |||
20 mo | ||||||
Mf positive | 5/76 (6.6%) | 50/74 (67.6%) | 2/67 (3.0%) | 47/70 (67.1%) | 1/42 (2.4%) | 27/45 (60.0%) |
P valueb | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | |||
Mean ± SD | 0.75 ± 4.57 | 3.99 ± 9.05 | 0.56 ± 4.35 | 3.88 ± 9.12 | 0.85 ± 5.49 | 1.87 ± 4.24 |
GMc | 0.12 | 1.35 | 0.07 | 1.29 | 0.09 | 0.83 |
Min–Max | 0–35.60 | 0–46.58 | 0–35.60 | 0–46.58 | 0–35.60 | 0–24.46 |
Median | 0 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.21 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 0 | 0, 2.91 | 0, 0 | 0, 2.41 | 0, 0 | 0, 1.24 |
P valued | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | |||
Persistently Mf positivee | 1/69 (1.4%) | 24/69 (34.8%) | 0/65 (0%) | 24/68 (35.3%) | 0/40 (0%) | 15/44 (34.1%) |
Abbreviations: GM, geometric mean; ITT, intention to treat; IVM, ivermectin; Mf, microfilariae; PP, per protocol; SD, standard deviation.
a The ITT set includes all patients who received the study drugs for at least 1 day. The Treatment-PP set includes all people who took the treatment according to protocol and on this basis another set was created, only including people who also took part in both rounds of mass drug administration between treatment and 20 months of follow-up (Treatment and IVM-PP).
b Fisher exact test.
c The GM was calculated by adding 1 to all values and after the calculation 1 was again subtracted from the result.
d Mann–Whitney U test.
e Number of participants who were persistently Mf positive over all 3 timepoints.
Of the 87 study participants who completed the treatment PP and received 2 rounds of IVM during the course of the trial (treatment and IVM-PP), 49.4% were microfilaridermic (Mf positive) at study entry. At the 12-month follow-up time point, only 1 of 40 individuals (2.5%) in the doxycycline treatment group remained microfilaridermic, indicating a significant drop after treatment. In contrast, 24 of 44 patients (54.5%) in the placebo group remained Mf-positive despite 1 additional round of IVM (P < .001). Importantly, even after 2 additional rounds of IVM at the 20-month follow-up, 34.1% of individuals in the placebo group were persistently Mf positive.
In the ITT dataset, a few more patients in the doxycycline treatment arm remained microfilaridermic, consistent with the fact that 13 patients did not complete the doxycycline regimen. Interestingly, in the PP dataset, 7 of 69 patients were still Mf positive after 12 months, whereas this number dropped to 2 of 67 patients after 20 months, consistent with a block in new embryo production and therefore slow decay of Mf in the absence of IVM.
In summary, the Mf data reflect the long-term sterilization of O. volvulus after treatment with doxycycline, whereas fertility of female worms was not reduced in placebo patients. The results from the placebo group are of particular concern, as despite 2 additional rounds of IVM, Mf positivity still remained prevalent in this group.
Doxycycline Inhibits Embryogenesis and Has Macrofilaricidal Activity
All the histological analyses were performed according to PP analysis—that is, included only those individuals who had completed doxycycline/placebo treatment and adhered to the 20-month follow-up. Worms were classified as having many, few, or no Wolbachia (Table 3), as described previously [15]. Eighty percent of the female worms in the placebo group were Wolbachia positive (few and many), whereas only 5.1% contained Wolbachia in the doxycycline-treated group (P < .001). A similar difference was observed for male worms.
Table 3.
Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/ Nodulesa | No. of Living Female Wormsb |
No. of Living Male Wormsb |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allc | With Wolbachiad |
Allc | With Wolbachiad |
|||||||
Many | Few | None | Many | Few | None | |||||
Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 117 | 1 | 5 | 111 | 41 | 0 | 3 | 36 |
Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 184 | 60 | 80 | 35 | 54 | 5 | 19 | 26 |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only are subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Although the number of all living worms is given to make the numbers consistent to the other tables, in 15 worms, it was not possible to distinguish if the worm had many, few, or no Wolbachia, due to too little worm material in the respective histological sections. Therefore, “All” is not always a summary of the 3 categories.
d Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding absence of Wolbachia (bP < .001 for female and male worms respectively, Fisher exact test).
When investigating for embryogenesis, we found that, in accordance to our earlier study [15], 53% of female worms in the placebo group had normally developed embryos at 20 months, and Mf were observed in 30.7% of the nodules analyzed (Table 4). In contrast, only 3.8% female worms from the doxycycline group exhibited normal embryogenesis, and none of the 152 nodules were Mf positive. In addition to the inhibition of embryogenesis, we also observed a significant reduction in the insemination of the female worms in this group (Table 4).
Table 4.
Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesa | No. of Living Female Wormsb |
No. of Nodules |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Embryosc |
Sperms in Uterusd | All | With Intact Microfilariaee | ||||||
Not Judgeable | Uterus Empty, Oocytes Only | Normal | Degenerated | |||||||
Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 117 | 13 | 93 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 152 | 0 |
Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 184 | 16 | 76 | 89 | 3 | 54 | 199 | 61 |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only are subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the presence of normal vs degenerated embryogenesis (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
d Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the number of worms found with sperms within the uterus (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
e Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the proportion of nodules with intact microfilariae (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
The doxycycline group showed a significant increase in dead female worms at 20 months compared with the placebo group (Table 5; P < .001). A trend toward a higher percentage of dead males in the doxycycline-treated group was also seen (P = .136); the variability may be due to the observation that dead males are more quickly absorbed than females [20]. The age pattern of the worm population did not reveal significant differences between the treatment groups (Table 6).
Table 5.
Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesa | No. of Female Wormsb |
No. of Male Wormsb |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Dead Femalesc (%) | All | Dead Males (%) | |||
Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 253 | 136 (54%) | 50 | 9 (18%) |
Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 300 | 116 (39%) | 58 | 4 (7%) |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only were subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the proportion of dead female worms (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
Table 6.
Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesb | No. of Living Female Worms |
No. of Living Male Worms |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Age |
Allc | Age |
|||||||||
Newly Acquired | Young | Middle | Old | Newly Acquired | Young | Middle | Old | |||||
Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/157 | 125 | 8 | 12 | 48 | 57 | 41 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 10 |
Placebo | 20 | 63/205 | 191 | 7 | 30 | 73 | 81 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 17 |
a Characteristics for the age of a worm included loss of body wall integrity, loss of nuclei of all organs, and absence of aspartic protease (APR) staining. Very degenerated worms, still APR positive, were classified as moribund and grouped in the category “dead.” Older worms were larger and presented degenerated tissues. Gomori iron stain showed that the worms accumulated more iron with increasing age, first in the gut and later in other organs. Using an antibody against O. volvulus lysosomal aspartic protease, the gut of young worms was stained only weakly, whereas it was stronger in older worms, accompanied by additional staining of hypodermis and epithelia. These criteria as well as morphological findings (diameter, position within the nodule) were used to discriminate newly acquired worms [4, 15].
b Only evaluable patients/nodules are included. In contrast to Tables 4–6, newly acquired worms are included.
c In 3 male worms, it was not possible to distinguish the age pattern of the worm in the respective histological sections. Therefore, “All” is not always a summary of the 4 categories.
Table 7 shows the average numbers of sites and nodules, palpated at study entry and at 20 months prior to nodulectomy, as well as the actually ectomized and evaluated nodules. There was a greater reduction in the number of palpated nodules in the doxycycline group over the observation period compared with the placebo group (P = .015). These data suggest that dead worms are absorbed over time and that the macrofilaricidal effect of doxycycline may even have been greater than detected by histology.
Table 7.
Study Time Point | No. of Nodules |
No. of Sites |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | |
Baseline | ||||
No. of patients | 71 | 76 | 71 | 76 |
Total No. of nodules/sites | 178 | 182 | 114 | 116 |
Mean ± SD | 2.51 ± 1.40 | 2.39 ± 1.86 | 1.61 ± 0.78 | 1.53 ± 0.81 |
Min–Max | 1–6 | 1–11 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 1, 3 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
P valueb | P = .151 | P = .378 | ||
20 mo | ||||
No. of patients | 67 | 69 | 67 | 69 |
Total No. of nodules/sites | 137 | 150 | 98 | 104 |
Mean ± SD | 2.04 ± 1.32 | 2.17 ± 1.68 | 1.46 ± 0.68 | 1.51 ± 0.87 |
Min–Max | 1–6 | 0–8 | 1–4 | 0–4 |
Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
P valueb | P = .858 | P = .903 | ||
Difference 20 mo – baseline | ||||
No. of patients | 67 | 69 | 67 | 69 |
Mean ± SD | −0.43 ± 1.03 | −0.09 ± 1.00 | −0.12 ± 0.54 | 0.01 ± 0.56 |
Min–Max | −5 to 2 | −4 to 2 | −1 to 1 | −2 to 1 |
Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25th, 75th percentiles | −1, 0 | 0, 0 | 0, 0 | 0, 0 |
P valueb | P = .015 | P = .109 | ||
Operatedc | ||||
No. of patients | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 |
Total No. of nodules/sites | 182 | 227 | 99 | 108 |
Mean ± SD | 2.76 ± 2.18 | 3.44 ± 2.79 | 1.5 ± 0.75 | 1.64 ± 0.97 |
Min–Max | 1–13 | 1–14 | 1–4 | 1–5 |
Median | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 2, 4 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
P valueb | P = .126 | P = .591 | ||
Evaluatedd | ||||
No. of patients | 56 | 63 | 56 | 63 |
Total No. of nodules/sites | 152 | 199 | 79 | 97 |
Mean ± SD | 2.71 ± 2.02 | 3.16 ± 2.39 | 1.41 ± 0.73 | 1.54 ± 0.84 |
Min–Max | 1–11 | 1–12 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 2, 4 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
P valueb | P = .277 | P = .412 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
a The set used here (Treatment-per protocol) includes all people who took the treatment (doxycycline or placebo) according to protocol.
b Mann–Whitney U test.
c In 4 participants, no nodule was found before or after incision.
d Thirteen participants and, in total, 11.5% (n = 47) of all nodules could not be analyzed for parasitic status; the reasons for this exclusion included extensive calcification of the nodule, or being of nononchocercal origin (eg, foreign body granulomas, lipomas, or lymph nodes). An additional 11 nodules were subtracted for containing newly acquired worms only.
Additional Statistical Analyses
In addition to the PP analysis, we reanalyzed the data using the ITT data set. Table 8 shows in summary that even under ITT conditions, all parameters compared were still significant, this being the case at the level of the worm itself as well as with the total sum of the worms present per patient. Details on the ITT dataset for presence of Wolbachia, embryogenesis, and worm killing can be found in Supplementary Tables 2–5.
Table 8.
Per Patientb |
Per Single Wormc |
Regression Analysisd (Repeated Factor: Patient) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PP | ITT | PP | ITT | PP | ITT | |
Dead females | P = .097 | P = .091 | P < .001 | P = .001 | P = .006 | P = .011 |
OR = 1.8438 | OR = 1.6987 | OR = 1.9809 | OR = 1.8134 | |||
Live females | P = .028 | P = .054 | P < .001 | P = .001 | P = .006 | P = .011 |
OR = 0.5424 | OR = 0.5887 | OR = 0.5048 | OR = 0.5514 | |||
Many bacteria (vs no bacteria) | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 |
OR = 0.0053 | OR = 0.0609 | OR = 0.0056 | OR = 0.0949 | |||
Few bacteria (vs no bacteria) | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 |
OR = 0.0197 | OR = 0.0444 | OR = 0.019 | OR = 0.044 | |||
No bacteria (vs few ± many bacteria) | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 |
OR = 74 | OR = 19.2287 | OR = 67.3149 | OR = 15.561 | |||
Normal vs degenerated embryogenesis | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 | P < .001 |
OR = 0.0193 | OR = 0.0666 | OR = 0.0234 | OR = 0.0844 | |||
Sperms in uterus | P < .001 | n.d.e | P < .001 | n.d.e | P < .001 | n.d.e |
OR = 0.2006 | OR = 0.1337 |
Abbreviations: ITT, intention to treat; n.d., not done; OR, odds ratio; PP, per protocol.
a The PP data set included all participants who took the treatment according to protocol and were present for the nodulectomies at 20 months. This data set was used for the primary analyses of all histological data. The ITT set included all patients who received the study drugs for at least 1 day. This data set was used to describe all baseline data and the adverse reactions. It was additionally used to confirm the primary PP analysis. In this case, missing values from participants who were not present for nodulectomies (n = 19) were replaced by a worst-case scenario (1 nodule containing 1 live female, Wolbachia-positive worm with normal embryogenesis and intact microfilariae).
b Analysis was performed on the per-patient level using the Mann–Whitney U test.
c Analysis was performed on the single-worm level using Fisher exact test.
d Analysis was performed by regression analysis (Proc Genmod) with the patient as repeated factor to account for dependence within patient. ORs are given for the doxycycline group.
e Not done as the ITT worst-case scenario was not defined for this parameter.
Because the worms within one patient could not, a priori, be regarded as independent (for example, they aggregate in nodules and this may facilitate their survival, and doxycycline may have had different bioavailability in different patients), we used alternating logistic regression to account for within-patient dependence (Table 8); despite the additional factor, results remained significant.
It was observed that the mean age differed between the treatment groups, which randomly occurred during the randomization process. Although multiple regression analysis did not show any influence of the patient's age on most of the histological outcome variables, it revealed different age effects in the treatment groups regarding the occurrence of dead worms (Supplementary Figure 2). A higher age in the placebo group was associated with an increased likelihood for dead worms (odds ratio [OR], 1.0771; P = .005), but this age effect was no longer present in the doxycycline group (OR, 1.0092; P = .5775).
DISCUSSION
There is now a consensus that chemotherapies beyond monotherapy with IVM are urgently needed for onchocerciasis. A number of situations and challenges underscore this reality: (1) individual cases presenting to doctors need to be given the best available treatment; (2) in Loa loa–coendemic areas, patients coinfected with loiasis with Loa Mf loads >8000 Mf/mL run a risk of developing serious, even fatal, neurologic reactions when treated with IVM as part of onchocerciasis MDA [21, 22]; (3) new agents are also needed should IVM resistance, or indeed any other form of SOR, occur.
The use of doxycycline fulfills these criteria for situations 1 and 2 for onchocerciasis. In situation 1, doxycycline's macrofilaricidal and long-term sterilizing activities render it a disease-curing choice for individual treatment, different to IVM, which will have to be repeated for years until the adult worms have terminally stopped embryogenesis [16]. The treatment recommendation here has been to administer 1 course of doxycycline followed by 1 round of IVM, to combine the sterilizing and killing effects of doxycycline on the female worms with the rapid killing of skin Mf by IVM [23].
In situation 2, recent consensus is to identify areas with a likelihood for coinfected individuals with high counts for L. loa Mf, and then to test (eg, with cell phone–based microscopy) all individuals in such areas and exclude those with >30 000 Mf/mL from IVM treatment [24]. However, those individuals can be treated safely with doxycycline to kill their O. volvulus parasites, as L. loa does not contain Wolbachia. In their 2013 annual meeting in Brazzaville, the Joint Action Forum, APOC's governing board, has adopted the use of doxycycline for treatment of individual patients (http://www.who.int/apoc/Journal_ENGLISH_Day_3_FINAL_red.pdf).
The present study delivers formal proof that doxycycline, given at 100 mg/day for 6 weeks, is also suitable for situation 3, in areas with SOR. This dose interrupted embryogenesis for at least 20 months, whereas the placebo group did not clear skin Mf even after receiving 2 additional doses of IVM; this latter group is typical of the SOR to IVM observed previously [11, 12, 17, 18]. Previous investigations in our study area have suggested that the presence of fertile female worms 3–6 months after the last of at least 9 rounds of IVM is inconsistent with a normal response to IVM [11, 12, 17, 18]. The results from the placebo group in our study underscore this further, while the doxycycline regimen delivers a safe “ready-to-go” approach for O. volvulus worms suspected of showing SOR to IVM. Community trials in our study area are currently addressing the impact of a test-and-treat strategy, using doxycycline in communities where SOR to IVM has been observed.
Doxycycline did not provoke a different level of ARs compared with the placebo group.
As opposed to the only known macrofilaricide suramin [25], the low toxicity of doxycycline is probably due to its relatively slow-acting effect on the worms, leading to a protracted death after more than a year [15, 26], ensuring that the host is able to handle the events occurring during the killing of the adults; as a consequence, severe ARs do not occur. The slow macrofilaricidal action of the drug, however, brings about an issue regarding monitoring in clinical trials if they take place in endemic areas. Although a 100% macrofilaricidal activity of doxycycline would probably be achieved, as model estimates go [27], this cannot be directly observed in trials because with observation periods >1.5 years, there is confounding interference from new incoming worms in geographical areas such as our study site, where infection transmission has not yet been interrupted [4, 15].
In the present trial, the proportion of dead worms analyzed in the available nodules after doxycycline was 54% (PP). A daily dose of “only” 100 mg/day as opposed to 200 mg/day [15] probably does not account for a lower number of dead worms, as new modeling data suggest that regardless of the daily dose, the average life span of a worm is reduced from the normal 10 years' average to 2 years after exposure to doxycycline for 4–6 weeks [28].
In addition, the actual macrofilaricidal rate was probably higher as we observed a loss of nodules between pretreatment and 20 months in the doxycycline group. Taking into account that about 0.4 nodules per patient were lost in this group (Table 7), with an average of about 1.5 female worms per nodule (Table 5), one would have to include approximately 30 more dead female worms to the death toll, raising the ratio to approximately 59%. Interestingly, it has been observed that the size of Onchocerca ochengi nodules is significantly reduced after tetracycline treatment in cattle and indicates absorption of the nodules [29].
The ultimate cause of the SOR to IVM is as yet unknown. Although selection of resistance genes has been discussed [30–33], and evidence of allele selection could indeed be documented from worms of our study area, there are other potential mechanisms, such as adaptation of the worms' biology (eg, change in transcription levels as opposed to gene mutation), or even immunological facilitation by the host. Along these lines, we have observed that the level of TGF-β detectable in host cells around female worms in nodules are associated with the rounds of IVM [34]. If these preliminary data hold for other areas, this type of SOR may become much more frequently observed and will require adequate therapeutic approaches, such as killing adult worms or sterilizing them permanently. This study shows that doxycycline treatment fulfills these requirements.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online (http://cid.oxfordjournals.org). Supplementary materials consist of data provided by the author that are published to benefit the reader. The posted materials are not copyedited. The contents of all supplementary data are the sole responsibility of the authors. Questions or messages regarding errors should be addressed to the author.
Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank Dr Claudio Bandi, University of Milan, Italy, for providing anti-Wolbachia surface protein antibodies. We are indebted to the volunteers for taking part in this study.
Financial support. This study received major funding by the European Commission (grant number 32.321). A. K. currently holds a German Academic Exchange Service scholarship. A. H. is a member of the German Centre for Infection Research and the excellence cluster “ImmunoSensation” (DFG: EXC 1023).
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No potential conflicts of interest.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1.Basanez MG, Pion SD, Churcher TS, Breitling LP, Little MP, Boussinesq M. River blindness: a success story under threat? PLoS Med 2006; 3:e371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coffeng LE, Stolk WA, Zoure HG et al. . African Programme For Onchocerciasis Control 1995–2015: model-estimated health impact and cost. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7:e2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Duke BO. The population dynamics of Onchocerca volvulus in the human host. Trop Med Parasitol 1993; 44:61–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Specht S, Hoerauf A, Adjei O, Debrah A, Buttner DW. Newly acquired Onchocerca volvulus filariae after doxycycline treatment. Parasitol Res 2009; 106:23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Turner HC, Walker M, Churcher TS et al. . Reaching the London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases goals for onchocerciasis: an economic evaluation of increasing the frequency of ivermectin treatment in Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:923–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Churcher TS, Pion SD, Osei-Atweneboana MY et al. . Identifying sub-optimal responses to ivermectin in the treatment of river blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:16716–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaplan RM. Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends Parasitol 2004; 20:477–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Albonico M, Bickle Q, Ramsan M, Montresor A, Savioli L, Taylor M. Efficacy of mebendazole and levamisole alone or in combination against intestinal nematode infections after repeated targeted mebendazole treatment in Zanzibar. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81:343–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.De Clercq D, Sacko M, Behnke J, Gilbert F, Dorny P, Vercruysse J. Failure of mebendazole in treatment of human hookworm infections in the southern region of Mali. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997; 57:25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eberhard ML, Lammie PJ, Dickinson CM, Roberts JM. Evidence of nonsusceptibility to diethylcarbamazine in Wuchereria bancrofti. J Infect Dis 1991; 163:1157–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Awadzi K, Attah SK, Addy ET et al. . Thirty-month follow-up of sub-optimal responders to multiple treatments with ivermectin, in two onchocerciasis-endemic foci in Ghana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2004; 98:359–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Awadzi K, Boakye DA, Edwards G et al. . An investigation of persistent microfilaridermias despite multiple treatments with ivermectin, in two onchocerciasis-endemic foci in Ghana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2004; 98:231–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cupp E, Richards F, Lammie P, Eberhard M. Efficacy of ivermectin against Onchocerca volvulus in Ghana. Lancet 2007; 370:1123; author reply 4–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoerauf A, Specht S, Marfo-Debrekyei Y et al. . Efficacy of 5-week doxycycline treatment on adult Onchocerca volvulus. Parasitol Res 2009; 104:437–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hoerauf A, Specht S, Buttner M et al. . Wolbachia endobacteria depletion by doxycycline as antifilarial therapy has macrofilaricidal activity in onchocerciasis: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Med Microbiol Immunol 2008; 197:295–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Taylor MJ, Hoerauf A, Bockarie M. Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. Lancet 2010; 376:1175–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Osei-Atweneboana MY, Eng JK, Boakye DA, Gyapong JO, Prichard RK. Prevalence and intensity of Onchocerca volvulus infection and efficacy of ivermectin in endemic communities in Ghana: a two-phase epidemiological study. Lancet 2007; 369:2021–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Osei-Atweneboana MY, Awadzi K, Attah SK, Boakye DA, Gyapong JO, Prichard RK. Phenotypic evidence of emerging ivermectin resistance in Onchocerca volvulus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011; 5:e998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Specht S, Brattig N, Buttner M, Buttner DW. Criteria for the differentiation between young and old Onchocerca volvulus filariae. Parasitol Res 2009; 105:1531–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buttner DW, Albiez EJ, von Essen J, Erichsen J. Histological examination of adult Onchocerca volvulus and comparison with the collagenase technique. Trop Med Parasitol 1988; 39(suppl 4): 390–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gardon J, Gardon-Wendel N, Demanga N, Kamgno J, Chippaux JP, Boussinesq M. Serious reactions after mass treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin in an area endemic for Loa loa infection. Lancet 1997; 350:18–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boussinesq M, Gardon J, Gardon-Wendel N, Kamgno J, Ngoumou P, Chippaux JP. Three probable cases of Loa loa encephalopathy following ivermectin treatment for onchocerciasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58:461–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Simonsen PE, Fischer P, Hoerauf A, Weil GJ. The filariases. In: Farrar J, Hotez PJ, Junghanss T, et al, eds. Manson's tropical diseases. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, 2014:737–65. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bennuru S, Pion SD, Kamgno J, Wanji S, Nutman TB. Repurposed automated handheld counter as a point-of-care tool to identify individuals ‘at risk’ of serious post-ivermectin encephalopathy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8:e3180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Awadzi K. Clinical picture and outcome of serious adverse events in the treatment of onchocerciasis. Filaria J 2003; 2(suppl 1):S6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hoerauf A, Mand S, Volkmann L et al. . Doxycycline in the treatment of human onchocerciasis: kinetics of Wolbachia endobacteria reduction and of inhibition of embryogenesis in female Onchocerca worms. Microbes Infect 2003; 5:261–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Taylor MJ, Hoerauf A, Townson S, Slatko BE, Ward SA. Anti-Wolbachia drug discovery and development: safe macrofilaricides for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis. Parasitology 2014; 141:119–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Walker M, Specht S, Churcher TS, Hoerauf A, Taylor MJ, Basanez MG. Therapeutic efficacy and macrofilaricidal activity of doxycycline for the treatment of river blindness. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 60:1199–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bah GS, Ward EL, Srivastava A, Trees AJ, Tanya VN, Makepeace BL. Efficacy of three-week oxytetracycline or rifampin monotherapy compared with a combination regimen against the filarial nematode Onchocerca ochengi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:801–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eng JK, Prichard RK. A comparison of genetic polymorphism in populations of Onchocerca volvulus from untreated- and ivermectin-treated patients. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2005; 142:193–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bourguinat C, Pion SD, Kamgno J et al. . Genetic selection of low fertile Onchocerca volvulus by ivermectin treatment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2007; 1:e72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ardelli BF, Guerriero SB, Prichard RK. Genomic organization and effects of ivermectin selection on Onchocerca volvulus P-glycoprotein. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2005; 143:58–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eng JK, Blackhall WJ, Osei-Atweneboana MY et al. . Ivermectin selection on beta-tubulin: evidence in Onchocerca volvulus and Haemonchus contortus. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2006; 150:229–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Korten S, Kaifi JT, Buttner DW, Hoerauf A. Transforming growth factor-beta expression by host cells is elicited locally by the filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus in hyporeactive patients independently from Wolbachia. Microbes Infect 2010; 12:555–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.