Abstract
Nature utilizes dimerization as a method of producing structurally complex metabolites. The microbial metabolites known collectively as the hibarimicins are one example of complex natural products produced biosynthetically by dimerization of a phenolic aromatic polyketide. Described in this communication are model studies aimed at demonstrating regiocontrolled oxidative dimerization of phenolic ring systems related to the biosynthetic precursor of the hibarimicin family of natural products.
Keywords: Oxidative dimerization, Regioselectivity, Silicon tether, Quinone, Oxidation
The hibarimicins are among the most complex aromatic polyketide natural products identified to date, with over ten family members isolated from the soil bacterium Microbispora rosea subsp. hibaria TP-A0121.1 The biosynthetic pathway leading to the hibarimicins proceeds by way of an initial oxidative dimerization of a tetracyclic monomer to provide HMP-Y1 followed by further oxidation to the aglycon hibarimicinone and glycosylation at peripheral hydroxyl groups (C10/C12 and C10′/C12′, Figure 1).2 Variation in the final glycosylation step leads to multiple glycosylated metabolites with structures of hibarimcins A, B, C, D and G assigned following extensive NMR analysis.3
Figure 1.
Hypothetical biosynthesis of hibarimicins.
To date, total syntheses of the aglycons hibarimicinone and HMP-Y1 have been achieved using a two-directional annulation approach starting from biaryl DE o-toluate esters and derivatives.4 Not previously described has been a biomimetic strategy using an oxidative dimerization of a tetracyclic precursor (cf. HMP-Y1 monomer to HMP-Y1, Figure 1). In the absence of an enzyme-mediated dimerization, such biomimetic homo couplings face several obstacles. First, oxidative dimerization needs to occur with high regio- and stereoselectivity. In an earlier publication we addressed the latter employing a dynamic thermodynamic resolution where a copper(I)-sparteine reagent deracemized biaryl phenols to afford optically enriched atropisomers (80–93% ee).5 Herein we describe studies addressing the regioselectivity of the dimerization and provide insight into the emerging oxidation state of the dimeric product.
Enzymatic6 and chemical7 phenolic oxidative couplings have been described; with chemical methods frequently showing modest to undesired regiocontrol.8 We started our investigations by examining the oxidative dimerization of electron rich phenol 1. In principal, three coupling products could be produced, C2–C2′, C6–C6′ and C2–C6′ biaryls. Oxidation with vanadium oxychloride provided primarily quinone 2 and a low yield of C6–C6′ bis-quinone 3. The structural assignment of bis-quinone 3 was based on comparison with published spectral data.9 Oxidative coupling with copper(II) chloride-TMEDA or hypervalent iodine afforded primarily bis-quinone 3, none of the intermediate bis-phenol were isolated under these reaction conditions. Sartoi10 reported on the use of aluminum chloride and ferric chloride to promote oxidative couplings by way of intermediate aluminum phenolates, when phenol 1 was subjected to these reaction conditions a 60% yield of bis-phenol 4 was observed, without any observed over oxidation to bis-quinone 3. The C6–C6′ connectivity of 4 was assigned based on an observed HMBC analysis and comparison to the C2–C2′ biaryl described earlier (9, Scheme 3).5
Scheme 3.

Silicon tethers have been employed in directing oxidative coupling of homo and hetero bis-phenols. To evaluate this strategy, phenol 1 was treated with diisopropyldichlorosilane to give bis-silylether 5 in 76% yield.11 Ferric chloride oxidation of 5 in nitromethane gave dibenzofuran 6 in 53% yield. Dibenzofuran 6 was produced from 5 by an initial coupling at C6 followed by a cation mediated cyclization and formal dehydration. The assignment of bond connectivity of 6 was based an observed nOe between the C2 proton and neighboring methyl ether. Notably, as reported earlier aryl coupling could be directed to C2–C2′ starting from alkyl ether derivatives of phenol 1, such as benzyl ether 7.5 To this end, directed ortho lithiation at C2 of 7, followed by cuprate formation and oxidation gave biaryl 8 in 47% yield.12 Removal of the benzyl groups then gave C2–C2′ bis-phenol 9.
We next turned our attention to examining an oxidative dimerization closely resembling the conversion of HMP-Y1 monomer to HMP-Y1 shown in Figure 1. To this end, we examined oxidative dimerization of tricyclic phenol 10 (Scheme 4). In this case, oxidation can lead to three isomeric dimeric products resulting from attachment at C2–C2′, C2–C6′ or C6–C6′ positions. Direct oxidation of 10 proved unproductive yielding only quinone 11 when using the earlier described Sartoi reaction conditions.10 We therefore turned our attention to the silicon tethered substrate 12 produced from phenol 10 in 62% yield. Productive conditions for the intramolecular oxidative coupling employed ferric chloride in nitromethane to provide bis-quinone 13 in 41% yield. While attachment occurred at the desired C2–C2′ sense, the reaction was accompanied by over oxidation to the quinone. However, this can be desirable as an entry into the hibarimicinone product manifold (cf. oxidation-cyclization, Figure 1).2,4b
Scheme 4.
In conclusion, we have examined using model substrates a biomimetic oxidative dimerization directed toward the total synthesis of hibarimicin progenitors HMP-Y1 and hibarimicinone. These studies suggest a silicon tethering strategy to be most promising.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 1.

Scheme 2.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (CA 059515) and the Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at do:XXXXX.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and notes
- 1.Hibarimicin B was first reported as angelimicin B: Hori H, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:2785–2788.Kajiura T, Furumai T, Igarashi Y, Hori H, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. J Antibiot. 1998;51:394–401. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.51.394.
- 2.(a) Hori H, Kajiura T, Igarashi Y, Furumai T, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. J Antibiot. 2002;55:46–52. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kajiura T, Furumai T, Igarashi Y, Hori H, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. J Antibiot. 2002;55:53–60. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Igarashi Y, Kajiura T, Furumai T, Hori H, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. J Antibiot. 2002;55:61–70. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kajiura T, Furumai T, Igarashi Y, Hori H, Higashi K, Ishiyama T, Uramoto M, Uehara Y, Oki T. J Antibiot. 1998;51:394–401. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.51.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Tatsuta K, Fukuda T, Ishimori T, Yachi R, Yoshida S, Hashimoto H, Hosokawa S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:422–425. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liau BB, Milgram BC, Shair MD. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:16765–16772. doi: 10.1021/ja307207q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Romaine IM, Hempel JE, Shanmugam G, Hori H, Igarashi Y, Polavarapu PL, Sulikowski GA. Org Lett. 2011;13:4538–4541. doi: 10.1021/ol2017005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bode SE, Drochner D, Mueller M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:5916–5920. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ashenhurst JA. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:540–548. doi: 10.1039/b907809f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Drochner D, Huttel W, Nieger M, Muller M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:931–933. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sperry J, Sejberg JJ, Steimke FM, Brimble MA. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:2599–2603. doi: 10.1039/b905077a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hendrickson JB, Haestier AM. New J Chem. 1990;14:689–693. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sartori G, Maggi R, Bigi F, Arienti A, Casnati G. Tetrahedron. 1992;48:9483–9494. [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Takada T, Arisawa M, Gyoten M, Hamada R, Tohma H, Kita Y. J Org Chem. 1998;63:7698–7706. [Google Scholar]; (b) Huang C, Gevorgyan V. Org Lett. 2010;12:2442–2445. doi: 10.1021/ol100924n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Surry D, Fox D, Macdonald S, Spring D. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 2005:2589–2590. doi: 10.1039/b501939g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Surry D, Spring D. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:218–225. doi: 10.1039/b508391p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



