Abstract
Background:
Central and peripheral mechanisms may be involved in migraine and tension-type headache pathogenesis, however the role of muscle disorders in their pathophysiological mechanisms remains unclear.
Objectives:
To assess the association between the presence of migraine or tension-type headache and changes in longus colli muscle dimensions and sternocleidomastoid muscle activity.
Method:
An observational study with 48 women comparing the following groups: migraine (n=21), tension-type headache (n=16), and control (n=11). The cross-sectional area, lateral and anteroposterior dimensions, and shape ratio of the longus colli muscle were measured using ultrasound. The activation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was assessed by signal amplitude and the decline in median frequency using surface electromyographic analysis.
Results:
The dimensions of the longus colli muscle did not differ between groups (p>0.05). Post-test analysis showed lower sternocleidomastoid muscle activation on both sides, at the onset of contraction, in the group with tension-type headache when compared to the control group {right sternocleidomastoid [tension-type headache: 0.39 (0.30-0.49); control: 0.58 (0.42-0.76); p=0.026] and left sternocleidomastoid [tension-type headache: 0.39 (0.31-0.48); control: 0.60 (0.42-0.79); p=0.039], Tukey's post hoc test}. There was no difference between the three groups in sternocleidomastoid muscle activation, on both sides, at the end of contraction (p>0.05). Intergroup analysis showed no difference in the rate of decline in median frequency (p>0.05).
Conclusion:
The group with tension-type headache exhibited less activation at the onset of sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction. No association was observed between the presence of headache and alterations in longus colli muscle dimensions, median frequency, and sternocleidomastoid muscle activation at the end of contraction.
Keywords: migraine disorders, tension-type headache, neck muscles, ultrasonography, electromyography, movement
Introduction
Migraine and tension-type headache are the most common source of pain in young workers and they have also been characterized as significant public health issues, with great socioeconomic impact1 - 4. These are primary headaches, and central and peripheral mechanisms may be involved in their pathogenesis5 , 6.
A number of authors6 - 10 have sought to elucidate the involvement of peripheral nociceptive stimuli in the pathogenesis of migraine and tension-type headache. However, the role of muscle alterations in the activation of the physiopathological process of these types of headache remains unclear8 - 10.
A possible reason for the association between changes in craniocervical muscles in patients with migraine or tension-type headache is the activation of trigemino-cervical nucleus during migraine or tension-type headache attacks. In this nucleus, there is a convergence of cervical and trigeminal nociceptive afferents in the trigeminocervical complex, releasing vasoactive algogenic substances, which facilitate pain transmission to the brain and promote awareness of the central nervous system4 - 5 , 11.
This is supported by other findings suggesting that individuals with migraine or tension-type headache are more likely to self-report neck pain and to report cervical muscles disorders, such as limited range of motion11, changes in head and cervical posture11, alterations in muscle dimensions12 - 14, and muscle fatigue and activation during contractions7 , 15. Several methods have been used to verify this association, including photogrammetry11, electromyography7 , 15 - 17, and ultrassonography12 - 14.
Prior studies7 , 15 - 17 have used electromyography to assess the relationship between headache and alterations in the superficial cervical activity of the sternocleidomastoid, splenius, and trapezius muscles. The results suggest that changes in activation7 , 16 , 17 and fatigability7 , 15 are more frequent in individuals with headache. However, previous assessments of neck muscle dimensions only included patients with chronic neck pain and did not include subjects with migraine.
Patients with chronic neck pain exhibited lower activation in deep neck muscles, such as the longus capitis and longus colli muscles12 - 14, accompanied by increased sternocleidomastoid muscle activity12 as a compensatory mechanism. In two studies13 , 14, the ultrasonographic images of these muscles showed a reduction in thickness13, cross-sectional area13, and anteroposterior dimension in individuals with chronic neck pain. Other findings suggest the presence of atrophy and alterations in muscle recruitment14.
In this respect, deep flexor muscles in the cervical region are essential to cervical spine postural control. Thus, imbalances between these muscles and superficial cervical muscles make the cervical spine less stable and more vulnerable to other forces involved in maintaining posture, causing overload in other muscles18.
Despite the importance of deep and superficial cervical flexor muscles in stabilizing and maintaining cervical lordosis and indications that migraine and tension-type headache are associated with changes in neck muscles, there is still a lack of studies7 , 15 - 17 that use non-invasive techniques to assess those muscles in individuals with migraine or tension-type headache not related to chronic neck pain.
Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the association between the presence of migraine or tension-type headache and changes in the longus colli muscle dimensions and sternocleidomastoid muscle activity, using ultrasonography and surface electromyography.
Method
This is an observational, cross-sectional type study comparing three groups. The sample size was not calculated because this is a pilot study. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Center of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil (CAAE 02219412.5.0000.5208). All participants gave their informed consent.
Data were collected from October/2012 to December/2013 in the Physical Therapy Department of UFPE.
Participants
The sample was composed of young adult women, aged between 20 and 30 years, to avoid biases due to the presence of muscle changes associated with biological aging. Only nulliparous women were included in order to prevent biases related to the relationship between hormones and the presence of headache19. Clinical diagnosis, established by a neurologist based on criteria proposed by The International Classification of Headache Disorders20, was used to divide the sample into migraine, tension-type headache, and control groups.
The migraine group was composed of women diagnosed with episodic migraine (less than 15 days with headache per month), with following characteristics: pure migraine (with aura, without aura or both) or probable migraine (with aura and without aura or both). Participants who had probable migraine associated with tension-type headache or migraine associated with tension-type headache were also allocated to the migraine group20. The tension-type headache group was formed by women with episodic tension-type headache (less than 15 days with headache per month)20. The control group was composed of participants who had intermittent headache crises over their lifetime that were not associated with the characteristics of primary headaches and those who did not meet the diagnostic criteria of migraine or tension-type headache20.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) body mass index ≥30 as obesity can increase the risk of chronic migraine19; 2) chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache or chronic neck pain due to the association between muscle alterations and chronification of headache and neck pain7 , 16 , 17; 3) diseases or dysfunctions such as myopathies, fibromyalgia, abnormalities, fractures or history of cervical spine or thoracic surgery, symptomatic spinal disc herniation, rheumatoid arthritis, and history of spinal tumors; 4) score ≥15 in the neck disability index21, score ≥36 in the Beck depression inventory or score ≥30 in the Beck anxiety inventory22 as neck disability, depression, and anxiety are disorders often comorbid with chronic migraine19 , 20.
The neck disability index is a questionnaire adapted and validated for the Brazilian population that provides information about how neck pain affects the ability to perform activities of daily living. It consists of 10 sections, scored from 0 to 5 each. Scores ≥15 indicate moderate neck dysfunction21.
The Beck depression and anxiety inventories are instruments for research of depressive and anxiety symptoms, translated and validated for the Brazilian population, and consists of 21 items. In the Beck depression inventory, the severity of symptoms varies from 0 to 3, with a maximum score of 63. Scores ≥36 indicate severe depression. In the Beck anxiety inventory, the sum of the items results in a total score that can range from 0 to 63, and scores ≥30 indicate severe anxiety22.
Data collection procedure
An examiner, blinded to the diagnosis of headache, performed an ultrasonographic assessment of the longus colli muscle and surface electromyographic evaluation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. During data collection, participants could not be menstruating or taking medication such as muscle relaxants, analgesics or anti-inflammatories, in the 48 hours before the examination.
To avoid measurement bias, the examiner was trained to perform the evaluations.
Ultrasonographic assessment of the longus colli muscle
B-mode ultrasonography (Aloka 1500 with 7.5 MHz linear transducer) was used to measure the cross-sectional area (cm2), as well as the lateral (cm), anteroposterior (cm), and shape ratio dimensions of the muscle.
The cross-sectional area was considered the greatest distance between the inner edges of the margins of the muscle image, without including fascial contours13. The lateral and anteroposterior dimensions were considered the greatest distance between one margin and another of the image, in the lateral and anteroposterior direction, respectively13. The shape ratio was obtained by dividing lateral and anteroposterior dimension values13.
Participants were positioned in dorsal decubitus, knees flexed, arms along the body and head in midline position14. The transducer was placed longitudinally in the anterior region of the neck, parallel to the trachea, approximately five centimeters from the midline at the level of vertebrae C5 and C6. The longus colli muscle is bordered inferiorly and medially by the vertebral body, laterally by the carotid artery, and superiorly by the retropharyngeal space13.
Three measurements of the muscle dimensions were taken at rest and during contraction, with a one-minute interval between them. In contraction, subjects were instructed to perform a cervical flexion, without removing their head and shoulders from the table, sustaining it for ten seconds14. The average of the three results for each measurement was used to compare intergroup dimensions.
Surface electromyography of the sternocleidomastoid muscle
The EMG device (model 410C, EMG System of Brazil Ltda.) was connected to a portable computer. The equipment has four channels, with pre-amplifiers, sample frequency per channel of 2000 Hz, Butterworth band-pass filter between 20 and 500 Hz, amplified 2000 times (common-mode rejection >120 dB), digitized with a frequency of 2 KHz per channel and amplitude range between -5 and +5 volts. After collection, the signal was digitized, converted to .txt format and analyzed using the software of the device itself.
Signal capture followed ISEK (International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology) Standards for Reporting EMG Data23. Electromyographic signals were detected using two rectangular surface electrodes (Ag/AgCl, self-adhesive, bipolar) on the muscle, twenty millimeters apart24.
Participants were placed in dorsal decubitus, knees flexed and feet resting on the table, arms flexed and hands above their head and resting on the table, in order to reduce the action of trunk and scapular waist muscles25. The electrodes were placed on the midpoint of the muscle belly, along the length of the muscle fibers17, from a reference line running between the lower point of the mastoid process and the center of the sternal furcula. The reference electrode was fixed to the lateral epicondyle of the left humerus.
In the first five seconds of collection, participants remained at rest with their head at maximum rotation amplitude to the opposite side to that assessed and leaning toward the same side. Cervical flexion was then performed, up to maximum amplitude25, maintaining the position in isometric contraction for twenty-five seconds, subjects not raising their shoulders from the table, followed by five seconds of rest. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was assessed unilaterally in order to minimize the cross-talk effect26.
The electrical activities analyzed were median frequency (Hz) and signal amplitude (v), through a time window manually driven by the software of the device itself. One-second samples of the electromyographic recording were analyzed at the start of the rest period (between 2 and 3 seconds), at the onset of contraction (between 6 and 7 seconds), and at the end of contraction (between 28 and 29 seconds).
Median frequency was measured at the start and end of muscle contraction in order to analyze the rate of decline at the end of contraction15. Muscle activation was determined from the amplitude of the electromyographic signal quantified by root mean square (RMS) values. Data were normalized by subtracting RMS values at the start and end of contraction from baseline values27. The average of median frequency and normalized RMS values was used for intergroup comparison.
Processing and data analysis
The data bank was digitized into Microsoft Excel (2007) spreadsheets and exported to SPSS 20.0 for analysis. Data were presented as mean (confidence interval) and percentage. All variables exhibited normal distribution in the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To verify the association between variables, paired t-test, one-way ANOVA (for intergroup comparisons separately), repeated measures two-way ANOVA (for intra and intergroup comparisons performed simultaneously) and Tukey's post hoc test were performed. Statistical significance was set at the 95% confidence level (p<0.05).
Results
A total of 52 participants were recruited, 4 of whom refused to take part in the study. Forty-eight women, aged on average 22.67 years (CI: 22.1-23.23), were allocated to the migraine (n=21), tension-type (n=16), and control (n=11) groups.
Of the participants with headache (n=37), 43% (n=16/37) suffered from episodic tension-type headache and 57% (n=21/37) migraine. Considering only the migraine group (n=21), we found the following frequency of subtypes: 67% (n=14/21) had migraine without aura; 14% (n=3/21) migraine without aura associated with episodic tension-type headache; 9% (n=2/21) migraine with aura; 5% (n=1/21) migraine with aura associated with episodic tension-type headache; and 5% (n=1/21) migraine with aura and without aura.
There was no intergroup difference (p>0.05) in age, height, weight or body mass index. The scores for the Neck disability index were statistically significant in the intergroup analysis (p=0.01; one-way ANOVA). Post-test analysis showed higher scores in the migraine group than in the control group (p<0.01); and higher scores in tension-type headache than in the control group (p=0.08). The Beck depression inventory scores and the Beck anxiety inventory scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05; Table 1).
Table 1. General characteristics of sample.
Groups | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control (n=11) | Migraine (n=21) | TTH (n=16) | p* | |
Age (years) | 21.64 (21.02-22.26) | 23.1 (22.12-24.07) | 22.81 (21.73-23.9) | 0.123 |
Weight (kg) | 57.26 (53.03-61.49) | 58.67 (55.22-62.12) | 57.34 (54.06-60.63) | 0.794 |
Height (m) | 1.64 (1.61-1.66) | 1.64 (1.62-1.67) | 1.62 (1.6-1.64) | 0.263 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.31 (19.38-23.23) | 21.43 (20.24-22.63) | 21.86 (20.69-23.03) | 0.824 |
NDI | 3.18 (1.72-4.88) | 8.86 (6.06-10.23) | 6.4 (4.87-9.25) | 0.01† |
BDI | 4.80 (1.88-7.72) | 7.71 (3.96-11.47) | 4.0 (2.37-5.63) | 0.16 |
BAI | 6.50 (1.61-11.39) | 6.52 (3.56-9.48) | 5.50 (2.79-8.21) | 0.88 |
Time with headache (years) | - | 8.71 (6.80-10.63) | 8.0 (6.03-9.97) | 0.59 |
Headache frequency (days/6 months) | - | 24.48 (11.75-37.20) | 6.50 (2.68-10.32) | 0.01** |
Headache duration (hours) | - | 6.62 (5.03-8.21) | 7.44 (1.31-13.57) | 0.21 |
One-way ANOVA. † Tukey's post-hoc test (control vs migraine group: p†<0.01; control vs tension-type headache group: p†=0.08; migraine vs tension-type group: p†=0.128). **p<0.05. Data are shown as mean and confidence interval. TTH: tension-type headache; n: number; BMI: Body mass index; NDI: Neck disability index; BDI: Beck depression inventory; BAI: Beck anxiety inventory.
Regarding participants with headache in Table 1, there was no difference between groups in the time with headache (p=0.59) and headache duration (p=0.21). However, headache frequency was higher in the migraine group than in the tension-type headache group (p=0.01).
Ultrasonographic analysis of the left and right longus colli muscle during rest and contraction revealed no intergroup difference in cross-sectional area or lateral, anteroposterior, and shape ratio dimensions (Table 2).
Table 2. Intergroup analysis of ultrasonography of the longus colli muscle during rest and contraction.
Longus colli muscle | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left | Right | |||||||
Groups | ||||||||
Measures | Control (n=11) | Migraine (n=21) | TTH (n=16) | p* | Control (n=11) | Migraine (n=21) | TTH (n=16) | p* |
CSA rest | 0.60(0.49-0.70) | 0.58(0.51-0.64) | 0.60(0.46-0.75) | 0.899 | 0.61(0.51-0.72) | 0.62(0.55-0.68) | 0.63(0.45-0.80) | 0.985 |
CSA contraction | 0.57(0.43-0.71) | 0.51(0.45-0.56) | 0.52(0.38-0.65) | 0.677 | 0.56(0.42-0.60) | 0.55(0.47-0.63) | 0.56(0.41-0.72) | 0.988 |
LL rest | 1.31(1.11-1.51) | 1.34(1.26-1.42) | 1.27(1.09-1.45) | 0.708 | 1.32(1.15-1.49) | 1.39(1.28-1.49) | 1.30(1.10-1.49) | 0.598 |
LL contraction | 1.29(1.07-1.51) | 1.31(1.22-1.39) | 1.25(1.08-1.42) | 0.817 | 1.31(1.08-1.55) | 1.37(1.26-1.49) | 1.28(1.06-1.49) | 0.673 |
AP rest | 0.58(0.53-0.63) | 0.55(0.51-0.58) | 0.59(0.52-0.65) | 0.377 | 0.57(0.53-0.61) | 0.56(0.53-0.65) | 0.57(0.50-0.65) | 0.905 |
AP contraction | 0.53(0.47-0.59) | 0.51(0.48-0.54) | 0.53(0.47-0.59) | 0.788 | 0.52(0.47-0.57) | 0.53(0.49-0.56) | 0.55(0.48-0.61) | 0.766 |
SR rest | 2.28(1.90-2.65) | 2.47(2.31-2.63) | 2.15(1.93-2.36) | 0.076 | 2.26(20.1-2.50) | 2.46(2.23-2.70) | 2.23(2.00-2.47) | 0.274 |
SR contraction | 2.44(2.07-2.81) | 2.55(2.38-2.72) | 2.33(2.17-2.49) | 0.262 | 2.48(2.10-2.87) | 2.61(2.38-2.85) | 2.31(2.04-2.58) | 0.232 |
One-way ANOVA. Data are shown as mean and confidence interval. TTH: tension-type Headache; n: number; CSA: cross sectional area, cm2; LL: lateral measure, cm; AP: anteroposterior measure, cm; SR: shape ratio.
There was a statistically significant intergroup difference in right and left sternocleidomastoid muscle activation at the onset of contraction (p<0.05; repeated measures two-way ANOVA). Post-test analysis showed less sternocleidomastoid muscle activation on both sides at the start of contraction in the group with tension-type headache when compared to the control group {right sternocleidomastoid [tension-type headache: 0.39 (0.30-0.49); control: 0.58 (0.42-0.76); p=0.026] and left sternocleidomastoid [tension-type headache: 0.39 (0.31-0.48); control: 0.60 (0.42-0.79); p=0.039], Tukey's post-hoc test}. There was no difference between the three groups in sternocleidomastoid muscle activation, on either side, at the end of contraction (p>0.05; repeated measures two-way ANOVA; Table 3).
Table 3. Intergroup analysis of the means of normalized root mean square values of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Root mean square Sternocleidomastoid muscle | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left | Right | |||||
Groups | Beginning of contraction (6-7s) | End of contraction (28-29s) | Beginning of contraction (6-7s) | End of contraction (28-29s) | ||
Migraine (n=21) | 0.53 (0.44-0.63) | 0.42 (0.35-0.48) | 0.46 (0.39-0.53) | 0.39 (0.34-0.44) | ||
Control (n=11) | 0.60 (0.42-0.79) | 0.49 (0.37-0.62) | 0.58 (0.42-0.76) | 0.44 (0.32-0.58) | ||
p†=0.039 | p†=0.026 | |||||
TTH (n=16) | 0.39 (0.31-0.48) | 0.38 (0.30-0.47) | 0.39 (0.30-0.49) | 0.35 (0.27-0.45) | ||
p* | 0.038** | 0.188 | 0.033** | 0.369 |
Repeated measures two-way ANOVA. † Tukey's post-hoc test (difference between the migraine and control groups). **p<0.05. Data are shown as mean and confidence interval. TTH: tension-type headache; n: number; s: seconds.
In intragroup analysis, there was a significant difference (p<0.05; repeated measures two-way ANOVA) in median frequency variation between the start and end of sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction, indicating a decline in median frequency at the end of contraction in all groups. However, the difference in the rate of median frequency decline, from the start to the end of sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction, was not significant between groups (p=0.092 on the left side and p=0.97 on the right side; repeated measures two-way ANOVA; Table 4).
Table 4. Intra and inter-group analysis of the variation in median frequency between the beginning and the end of the contraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Median frequency Sternocleidomastoid muscle | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left | Right | |||||
Groups | Beginning of contraction (6-7s) | End of contraction (28-29s) | p* | Beginning of contraction (6-7s) | End of contraction (28-29s) | p* |
Control (n=11) | 75.99 (69.31-82.66) | 66.40 (58.88-73.91) | 0.010 | 76.70 (70.24-83.15) | 64.98 (55.42-74.53) | 0.008 |
Migraine (n=21) | 87.23 (80.69-93.77) | 75.70 (70.09-81.30) | <0.001 | 85.74 (78.71-92.78) | 74.77 (67.81-81.73) | <0.001 |
TTH (n=16) | 82.75 (76.57-88.94) | 66.40 (60.71-72.08) | <0.001 | 78.85 (71.28-86.42) | 67.86 (61.84-73.89) | <0.001 |
p† | 0.092 | 0.974 |
Paired t-test; †repeated measures two-way ANOVA. Data are shown as mean and confidence interval. TTH: tension-type headache; n: number; s: seconds.
Discussion
The hypothesis that women with migraine or tension-type headache have a shorter longus colli muscle and increased sternocleidomastoid muscle activity, when compared to women without headache, was not confirmed. On the other hand, the present study is innovative in that it assesses muscles with important stabilization and postural alignment functions in the cervical region in a young population with migraine or episodic tension-type headache.
Since muscle alterations may be more associated with biological aging and chronification of headache and neck pain7 , 16 , 17 than with episodic headache in a younger population (15 to 24 years), the present study avoided a confusion factor in the association between muscle modifications and the emergence of headaches. Therefore, differences between our results and those reported in the literature7 , 16 , 17 may be due to the different characteristics and age groups of the populations analyzed.
In this study, there was less activation at the onset of sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction in the group with tension-type headache, when compared to participants without headache. Corroborating our findings, other authors have also observed less activation and more prolonged sternocleidomastoid muscle relaxation in participants with chronic neck pain associated with headache16.
On the other hand, studies that showed greater activation and fatigability in cervical muscles, such as the sternocleidomastoid, splenius17, frontal and temporal7, assessed participants with chronic tension-type headache7 , 17. Thus, the increase in muscle activation and fatigability may be a consequence of the motor control reorganization strategy in subjects with chronic headache17, generating muscle overload and fatigue, increased nociception17, and changes in the type of muscle fiber7.
Therefore, the reduced muscle activation values observed in the group with tension-type headache may be related to the increased basal tonus in the sternocleidomastoid muscle and smaller amount of fast fibers. The reduction in type II fibers can be associated with lower speed of contraction, reducing the muscle activation in the tension-type group7. Similarly, the absence of a difference in sternocleidomastoid muscle activation in the group with migraine suggests that these individuals may have another type of muscle fiber.
The neck disability index scores were higher in the migraine and tension-type headache groups than in the control group, suggesting that neck pain adds significantly to the overall disability of individuals with migraine or tension-type headache. Neck pain-related disability can be associated with changes in body posture28 and seems to increase as the frequency of migraine attacks increases29. Furthermore, this disability may be a functional consequence of changes in craniocervical posture in migraine patients29.
With respect to the analysis of deep cervical muscles, one study10 showed that people with chronic neck pain exhibited imbalance between deep and superficial cervical flexor muscles, such as the longus colli and sternocleidomastoid muscles. In our study, similar results were expected in groups with migraine or tension-type headache. However, given that they are deep muscles in the cervical region, alterations in this structure may only be perceived when there is prolonged accumulation of nociceptive stimuli, as in chronic neck pain12 , 14.
Moreover, there are also reports of reduced thickness14, cross-sectional area, and anteroposterior dimension13 in the longus colli muscle of individuals with chronic neck pain. However, it is important to underscore that chronic neck pain may be linked to muscle atrophy and alterations in muscle dimension and recruitment14, justifying the discrepancies in the findings of the present study. Thus, alterations in cervical muscles are most likely correlated to pain chronification, as occurs in the aging process or in conditions such as chronic migraine, cervicogenic headache and chronic neck pain, than to the pathogenesis of headache7 , 16 , 17 , 19.
One of the limitations of the present study was that it is not a longitudinal study and does not involve a long-term follow-up of participants to establish a more accurate association between alterations in cervical muscles and the presence of headache. Additionally, the need to control some factors that possibly trigger the headache and the higher prevalence of migraine compared with tension-type headache and women without primary headache limited our ability to obtain a larger sample, especially for the control group.
The clinical importance of our study is that the knowledge of changes in muscle function will be important to guide physical therapy treatment in patients with headache. The decreased activation in the sternocleidomastoid muscle at the onset of contraction in the tension-type headache group suggests the importance of more muscle assessments in patients with headache. Furthermore, patients with headache benefited from the Neck disability index evaluation, because in our study they were more likely to report neck disability than the control group, suggesting that the prevalence of neck pain is higher in patients with headache.
Conclusion
In the present study, the group with tension-type headache showed less sternocleidomastoid muscle activation at the onset of contraction. No association was observed between the presence of headache and alterations in the dimensions of the longus colli muscle, median frequency, and sternocleidomastoid muscle activation at the end of contraction.
References
- 1.Morelli JGS, Rebelatto JR. The effectiveness of manual therapy in individuals with headaches, with and without cervical degeneration: analysis of six cases. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(4):285–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000400013 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Winter AC, Berger K, Buring JE, Kurth T. Associations of socioeconomic status with migraine and non-migraine headache. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(2):159–170. doi: 10.1177/0333102411430854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102411430854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reynales H, Aycardi E, Valencia D. [Migraine: implications for work, disability and request for health services in Colombia] Rev Neurol. 2001;32(11):1001–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fumal A, Schoenen J. Tension-type headache: current research and clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(1):70–83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70325-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70325-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burstein R. Deconstructing migraine headache into peripheral and central sensitization. Pain. 2001;89(2-3):107–110. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00478-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00478-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sohn J-H, Choi H-C, Jun A-Y. Differential patterns of muscle modification in women with episodic and chronic tension-type headache revealed using surface electromyographic analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(1):110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jensen R, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Olesen J. Quantitative surface EMG of pericranial muscles in headache. A population study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;93(5):335–344. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90121-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)90121-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rollnik JD, Karst M, Fink M, Dengler R. Botulinum toxin type A and EMG: a key to the understanding of chronic tension-type headaches? Headache. 2001;41(10):985–989. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01193.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01193.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bartsch T. Migraine and the neck: new insights from basic data. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005;9(3):191–196. doi: 10.1007/s11916-005-0061-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11916-005-0061-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bartsch T, Goadsby PJ. Increased responses in trigeminocervical nociceptive neurons to cervical input after stimulation of the dura mater. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 8):1801–1813. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ferreira MC, Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Dach FE, Speciali JG, Gonçalves MC, Chaves TC. Body posture changes in women with migraine with or without temporomandibular disorders. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(1):19–29. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Falla DL, Jull GA, Hodges PW. Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine. 2004;29(19):2108–2114. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000141170.89317.0e. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000141170.89317.0e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Javanshir K, Rezasoltani A, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Amiri M, Ortega-Santiago R, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Ultrasound assessment of bilateral longus colli muscles in subjects with chronic bilateral neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(4):293–301. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820173e5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820173e5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jesus-Moraleida FR, Ferreira PH, Pereira LSM, Vasconcelos CM, Ferreira ML. Ultrasonographic analysis of the neck flexor muscles in patients with chronic neck pain and changes after cervical spine mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34(8):514–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.08.006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oksanen A, Pöyhönen T, Metsähonkala L, Anttila P, Hiekkanen H, Laimi K. Neck flexor muscle fatigue in adolescents with headache: an electromyographic study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(7):764–772. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barton PM, Hayes KC. Neck flexor muscle strength, efficiency, and relaxation times in normal subjects and subjects with unilateral neck pain and headache. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(7):680–687. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90008-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90008-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Falla D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Farina D. Cervical muscle co-activation in isometric contractions is enhanced in chronic tension-type headache patients. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(7):744–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01584.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01584.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Vallée C, Roudier R, Barbet JP, Bargy F. Longus colli has a postural function on cervical curvature. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;16(4):367–371. doi: 10.1007/BF01627655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01627655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peres MF, Sanchez del Rio M, Seabra ML, Tufik S, Abucham J, Cipolla-Neto J. Hypothalamic involvement in chronic migraine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(6):747–751. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.6.747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society The international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(1 Suppl 1):9–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cook C, Richardson JK, Braga L, Menezes A, Soler X, Kume P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2006;31(14):1621–1627. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000221989.53069.16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000221989.53069.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stulz N, Crits-Christoph P. Distinguishing anxiety and depression in self-report: purification of the beck anxiety inventory and beck depression inventory-II. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(9):927–940. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Merletti R, Di Torino P. Standards for reporting EMG data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(1):3–4. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361–374. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kendall HO, Kendall FP, Wadsworth GE. Músculos, pruebas y funciones. Barcelona: JIMS; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basmajian JV. Electrofisiología de la acción muscular. Buenos Aires: Medica Panamericana; 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Madill SJ, McLean L. Quantification of abdominal and pelvic floor muscle synergies in response to voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(6):955–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gonçalves MC, Florencio LL, Chaves TC, Speciali JG, Bigal ME, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Do women with migraine have higher prevalence of temporomandibular disorders? Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(1):64–68. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Florencio LL, Chaves TC, Carvalho GF, Gonçalves MC, Casimiro EC, Dach F. Neck pain disability is related to the frequency of migraine attacks: a cross-sectional study. Headache. 2014;54(7):1203–1210. doi: 10.1111/head.12393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.12393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]