Abstract
Purpose
We have observed that the commonly used ketamine/xylazine anesthesia mix can induce a focally severe and permanent corneal opacity. The purpose of this study was to establish the clinical and histological features of this deleterious side effect, its sensitivity with respect to age and anesthesia protocol, and approaches for avoiding it.
Methods
Young C57BL/6J, C57BLKS/J, and SJL/J mice were treated with permutations of anesthesia protocols and compared using slit-lamp exams, optical coherence tomography, histologic analyses, and telemetric measurements of body temperature.
Results
Ketamine/xylazine induces corneal damage in mice with a variable frequency. Among 12 experimental cohorts, corneal damage associated with ketamine/xylazine was observed in 9 of them. Despite various treatments to avoid corneal dehydration during anesthesia, the frequency of corneas experiencing damage among responding cohorts was 42% (26% inclusive of all cohorts), which is significantly greater than the natural prevalence (5%). The damage was consistent with band keratopathy. It appeared as a white or gray horizontal band located proximal to the pupil and was positive for subepithelial calcium deposition with von Kossa stain.
Conclusions
The sum of our clinical and histological observations is consistent with ketamine/xylazine-induced band keratopathy in mice. This finding is relevant for mouse studies involving the eye and/or vision-dependent behavioral assays, which would both be prone to artifact without appreciation of the damage caused by ketamine/xylazine anesthesia. Use of yohimbine is suggested as a practical means of avoiding this complication.
Introduction
Mice are widely utilized in many types of ophthalmic research and development[1–6], including the study of diseases of infancy and childhood that necessitate studies with young mice.[7–10] We have recently uncovered an unusual and deleterious influence that the commonly used ketamine/xylazine anesthesia mix has on the cornea of young mice. In searching the literature for a potential explanation of this phenomenon, we found that this complication is currently not widely appreciated. Here, we present data demonstrating that this anesthesia-induced side-effect is a form of band keratopathy and that it can readily be prevented by use of yohimbine.
Methods
Animals
The precise strain, age, and source, as well as treatments, of all mice in this study are summarized in Table 1. All animals were housed in non-barrier facilities maintained by the Office of Animal Resources at The University of Iowa. All animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Iowa.
Table 1. Summary of experiments.
Cohort | Experiment Date | Strain | Age | Sex | Source a | Anesthesia b | Drops and Hydration c | Yohimbine | OCT Retinal Scan d | Temperature Transponder | Supplemental Heat e | Eyes with damage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1/10/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | G + D | OU | Heating Pad | 3/4 (75%) | ||
1/10/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | S + D | OU | Heating Pad | 3/4 (75%) | |||
1/10/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | H + D | OU | Heating Pad | 3/4 (75%) | |||
1/10/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | B + D | OS | Heating Pad | 6/8 (75%) | |||
1/10/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | B + D | OU | Heating Pad | 9/12 (75%) | |||
2 | 1/24/12 | C57BL/6J | 12 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | B + D | OS | Heating Pad | 2/8 (25%) | ||
3 | 4/2/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | None | Heating Pad-cont. | 0/4 (0%) | |||
4/2/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | K/X | None | Yes | Heating Pad-cont. | 0/8 (0%) | |||
4/2/12 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX AX4 | I | None | Heating Pad-cont. | 0/8 (0%) | ||||
4 | 2/12/13 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX MP15 | K/X | B | OU | Heating Pad | 8/8 (100%) | ||
2/12/13 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX MP15 | K/X | B | Yes | OU | Heating Pad | 0/8 (0%) | ||
2/12/13 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX MP15 | I | B | OU | Heating Pad | 0/8 (0%) | |||
5 | 8/8/13 | C57BLKS/J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Yes | Heating Pad | 2/4 (50%) | ||
8/8/13 | C57BLKS/J | 18 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Yes | Heating Pad | 0/4 (0%) | |||
6 | 10/29/13 | SJL/J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 4/10 (40%) | |||
7 | 10/30/13 | C57BLKS/J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Yes | Physitemp | 2/6 (33.3%) | ||
10/30/13 | C57BLKS/J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Yes | Physitemp-cont. | 2/8 (25%) | |||
8 | 3/6/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | M/F | IOWA | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 4/6 (66.7%) | |||
3/6/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | M/F | IOWA | K/X | P-N | Heating Pad | 0/8 (0%) | ||||
9 | 3/13/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 1/4 (25%) | |||
3/13/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | IOWA | K/X | P-AT | Heating Pad | 0/6 (0%) | ||||
10 | 4/7/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB07 | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 0/10 (0%) | |||
4/7/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB07 | K/X | P-AT | Heating Pad | 0/10 (0%) | ||||
11 | 6/10/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB07 | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 7/14 (50%) | |||
6/10/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB07 | K/X | P-N | Heating Pad | 2/12 (14.3%) | ||||
6/10/14 | C57BL/6J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB07 | K/X | P-AT | Heating Pad | 2/14 (16.7%) | ||||
12 | 6/10/14 | SJL/J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB04 | K/X | B | Heating Pad | 0/14 (0%) | |||
6/10/14 | SJL/J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB04 | K/X | P-N | Heating Pad | 0/12 (0%) | ||||
6/10/14 | SJL/J | 3 wks | F | JAX RB04 | K/X | P-AT | Heating Pad | 0/14 (0%) |
aJAX, received from The Jackson Laboratory, colony indicated, experiments initiated the day following receipt
bK/X, ketamine/xylazine; I, isoflurane
cG, Genteal; S, Systane; H, Hypotears; B, balanced salt solution; D, dilation drops; P-N, petrolatum with Neomycin antibiotic; P-AT, petrolatum-based artificial tears
dOU, both eyes; OS, left eye
econt., continuous supplemental heat
Anesthesia and ocular examination
For all cohorts involving ketamine/xylazine, mice were injected with a standard mixture of ketamine/xylazine (intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg ketamine + 10 mg xylazine / kg body weight; Ketaset®, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA; AnaSed®, Lloyd Laboratories, Shenandoah, IA). During induction of anesthesia, mice were placed in an empty cage and provided supplemental indirect warmth either by an electrical heating pad placed over the cage or an animal temperature controller connected to a rectal probe (TCAT-2LV controller, RET-3 probe, Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ). Among cohorts receiving dilating drops (2% Cyclogyl, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), drops were applied immediately following anesthesia and after 2 minutes the corneas were then hydrated with balanced salt solution (BSS; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), Systane Ultra (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX), GenTeal Mild to Moderate (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ), Hypo Tears (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ), Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfates and Bacitracin Zinc Ophthalmic Ointment USP (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY), or Artificial Tears (AKORN Animal Health, Lake Forest, IL). Among cohorts receiving retinal scans by optical coherence tomography (OCT; Bioptigen, Morrisville, NC), the eye was exposed for 1 minute to OCT. During recovery from anesthesia, both eyes were hydrated as indicated in Table 1 and all mice were again placed in an empty cage and provided supplemental indirect warmth either by an electrical heating pad placed over the cage or an animal temperature controller connected to a rectal probe. A subset of mice was injected with yohimbine (intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg yohimbine / kg of body weight; Yobine®, Lloyd, Inc., Shenandoah, IA) upon placement in an empty cage for recovery. The incidence of corneal opacities was evaluated one week following anesthesia either by OCT or slit-lamp. Mice evaluated by OCT one week post-anesthesia were re-anesthetized, corneas were hydrated with BSS, and both corneas were imaged using OCT. To evaluate the natural prevalence of corneal opacities, slit-lamp examinations were performed on our colony of C57BL/6J mice (>1 year of age; n = 72 eyes). Histologic analyses followed previously described standard methodologies.[11] Among cohorts anesthetized with isoflurane, mice were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane + 100% oxygen for 15 minutes.
Telemetric monitoring of body temperature
Implantable temperature transponders (IPTT-300; Bio Medic Data Systems; Seaford, DE) were injected subcutaneously into 21-day-old (n = 3) and 18-week-old (n = 3) C57BLKS/J mice anesthetized with isoflurane. Two days post-injection, body temperature was measured using an external recording device (DAS-7009 small smart reader; Bio Medic Data Systems; Seaford, DE) and then mice were injected with ketamine/xylazine, placed in an empty cage, and provided supplemental indirect warmth by an electrical heating pad placed over the cage. Immediately upon anesthesia, temperature was recorded (t = 0) and mice were removed from heat and placed on the OCT platform for 2.5 minutes. Mice were then given standard indirect warmth by an electrical heating pad placed over the cage for the recovery period and body temperature was monitored throughout recovery for up to 40 minutes. Body temperature measurements were taken every 2 minutes for the first 10 minutes, and then every 5 minutes for the remainder of the experiment.
Results
We initially observed an induction of central corneal opacities in longitudinal studies of post-natal ocular maturation in mice using OCT. For the original study, anesthetized mice were to be imaged on a weekly basis starting at 3 weeks of age. Based on prior studies of ocular growth in C57BL/6J mice, we expected to observe a clear and healthy cornea that gradually thickened through subsequent weeks of postnatal development.[12, 13] Unexpectedly, at the second week of imaging most of the corneas were damaged with opacities (Fig 1), making our original planned studies impossible. Subsequent characterization identified several features consistent with band keratopathy.[14, 15] Observed by OCT and slit-lamp examination, the opacities were centrally located, appearing as a horizontal band between the subepithelial layer and anterior stroma (Fig 1). Eyes appeared free from inflammation and there was no evidence of vascularization. Histologically, damaged corneas showed accumulation of a granular substance that raised the epithelial layer (Fig 2). Von Kossa staining showed the appearance of brown-black granules at the site of the lesion, indicating calcium deposition characteristic of band keratopathy (Fig 3). To our knowledge, neither band keratopathy nor corneal damage of any type has previously been reported in association with this strain of mice, imaging modality, or anesthesia protocol.
To suggest factors influencing the induction of these opacities, we next performed a series of experiments testing the effects of various permutations to each component of the experiment (Table 1). Among three-week-old mice receiving ketamine/xylazine anesthesia and standard post-anesthetic follow-up (supplemental warmth during induction and recovery, treatments to prevent corneal dehydration), 26% of all eyes exhibited corneal damage after 1 week (n = 55/210 eyes). Opacities were induced in cohorts of mice newly received from The Jackson Laboratory and cohorts born from existing colonies at The University of Iowa. Thus, the opacities were not obviously related to husbandry. Corneal opacities were observed in C57BL/6J, C57BLKS/J and SJL/J mice, inbred strains of mice with disparate central corneal thicknesses.[11] Thus, the induced opacities were also not a phenomenon unique to a single strain of mice. Opacities were equally present regardless of whether or not an eye had previously been imaged by OCT. Thus, the opacities were not the consequence of the imaging modality. Dilating drops were ruled out as a causative factor because their omission did not prevent the corneal damage. Having eliminated the above components as potential causative factors, the remaining agent utilized with all of the mice with corneal damage was ketamine/xylazine.
To explore the potentially damaging influence of ketamine/xylazine, we repeated the experiment with a cohort of 3-week-old C57BL/6J mice using isoflurane as a substitute anesthetic, yohimbine (Fig 4), a xylazine antagonist that accelerates recovery from ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, or using ketamine/xylazine with only standard post-anesthetic follow-up as a control (Table 1; cohort 4). No corneal damage was observed in any of the eyes from mice with either treatment (n = 0/8 eyes per treatment), whereas the control mice for this cohort had damage in all eyes (n = 8/8). Combined, these data support ketamine/xylazine as the damage-inducing agent.
To test the hypothesis that ketamine/xylazine anesthesia induces corneal opacities in mice, we compared the incidence in cohorts of naïve mice versus those that had been anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine. Corneal opacities are not a known naturally occurring feature of C57BL/6J, C57BLKS/J, or SJL/J mice and we have previously reported detecting only a single instance of a corneal opacity among a screen for corneal phenotypes among these strains.[11] To confirm the rate of naturally occurring central corneal opacities analogous to those we observed in our studies, we screened a cohort of naïve C57BL/6J mice (>1 year old) from our colony with a slit-lamp and observed this type of central corneal opacity to occur at a frequency of 5% (n = 4/72 eyes), which is significantly less than the frequency among ketamine/xylazine-treated responding cohorts (n = 60/144 eyes; 41.7%; p < 0.0001, Chi Square test) or all ketamine/xylazine-treated mice (n = 60/224 eyes; 26.8%; p < 0.0001, Chi Square test).
In considering potential mechanisms contributing to this phenomenon, we hypothesized that body temperature might have a role. Ketamine/xylazine anesthesia is known to cause a decrease in body temperature[16], as confirmed by our measurements using subcutaneous transponders throughout anesthesia in young and adult mice (Fig 5). To test whether this drop in body temperature contributes to the corneal damage, 3-week-old mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (without yohimbine), but rather than transferring the mice to the OCT for imaging, were instead maintained constantly with externally supplied warmth (delivered either by use of an electric heating pad or an animal temperature controller connected to a rectal probe) during all stages of the experiment. After one week, 17% (n = 2/12 eyes) of the mice developed opacities (Cohorts 3 & 7, Table 1). Thus, body temperature fluctuations may influence the corneal damage, but our attempts to minimize changes in body temperature were none-the-less unsuccessful in completely preventing it.
We also considered corneal desiccation as a potential mechanism. Opacities were observed in mice receiving independent water-based solutions influencing corneal dehydration (Systane Ultra, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX; GenTeal Mild to Moderate, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ; Hypo Tears, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ). Use of petrolatum-based ointments (Artificial Tears, AKORN Animal Health, Lake Forest, IL; Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfates and Bacitracin Zinc Ophthalmic Ointment USP, Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY;), however, potentially influences the incidence of corneal opacities, but was not able to completely prevent corneal damage.
Discussion
Ketamine/xylazine is one of the most common anesthetics utilized with mice,[17] but to our knowledge, a corneal-damaging influence of ketamine/xylazine has not previously been reported for mice. If not prevented or controlled for, this phenomenon could obviously have a significant impact on many different kinds of experiments, altering the anatomy and physiology of the anterior chamber and distorting the ability to image or record responses from the entire eye. Because this phenomenon is of broad experimental significance to ophthalmic research using mice, we felt it prudent to bring attention to the issue despite some lingering questions concerning the mechanism.
In investigating the literature, there are several potential side-effects of ketamine/xylazine. It is known that ketamine/xylazine can induce reversible cataracts in rodents[18] and can affect intraocular pressure.[19, 20] Corneal damage in young rats due to ketamine/xylazine has previously been observed. In 1988, it was reported by Guillet and colleagues that 84% of 3-week-old rats anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine developed corneal lesions.[21] No lesions were observed in rats administered ketamine or xylazine alone, nor if rats were treated with yohimbine during recovery. Similar results in rats were subsequently reported by Tita et al.[22] and Turner and Albassam who additionally showed that if rats were anesthetized with isoflurane instead of ketamine/xylazine, damage was avoided completely.[23] Similar to our observations, these studies using rats injected with ketamine/xylazine reported damage involving central corneal opacities and seem likely to indicate that the same deleterious side-effect we have observed occurs in multiple rodent species.
The mechanism for this phenomenon is unknown. In both humans and animals, band keratopathy has been associated with a variety of ocular and systemic conditions that, through a variety of mechanisms, leave Bowman’s membrane prone to calcification in areas of greatest environmental exposure.[24, 25] In the context of anterior uveitis, band keratopathy is more frequently observed in children than adults.[26, 27] Current hypotheses of pathophysiology center on events such as tear evaporation and changes in pH that may promote calcium precipitation, but much remains unknown concerning the precise mechanism(s).[25] Our studies of the ketamine/xylazine-induced form of this disease are consistent with a complex age-dependent interaction involving combined use of both compounds, though other mechanisms can’t be ruled out. Ketamine is primarily classified as an NMDA receptor antagonist, although interactions with other receptors and channels have also been reported.[28] Xylazine is an α2 adrenergic agonist and is commonly used with ketamine as an adjunct agent because of its analgesic and muscle relaxant properties.[29] Drawing from the experiments of Guillet et al. who showed that the damage in rats does not occur with ketamine or xylazine alone, and that the damage can be prevented by treatment with yohimbine (an α2 adrenergic antagonist), it appears that the phenomenon may be due to a complex drug interaction or physiologic consequence of the ketamine/xylazine mixture.Potential implications of this observation to humans are unclear. Ketamine is used clinically as a pediatric anesthetic[30] and increasingly as an antidepressant.[31] The safety of ketamine use in children has had some controversy.[32, 33] However, we are unaware of any reports of corneal damage in children and there is only one case report linking ketamine use to corneal damage in an adult.[34] Ketamine is also used non-clinically as a recreational drug.[35] To our knowledge, the use of xylazine is limited to veterinary practice. It is unknown, but possible, that other α2 adrenergic agonists that are used in human clinical practice could have a similar interaction if used concurrently with ketamine. Because reports of irreversible ketamine/xylazine-induced corneal damage are thus far limited to rodents, and the combination of scenarios placing humans potentially at risk unlikely, a case for imminent human relevance seems challenged but not impossible.
Among caveats of this study, an issue regarding variability merits particular mention. Cohort-to-cohort variability was notably present in our study. Among 12 total experimental cohorts comprising all of the experiments described above (see Table 1), induced corneal damage was not observed in controls (i.e., mice injected with ketamine/xylazine, given BSS drops to maintain corneal hydration, and provided standard post-anesthetic care) for 3 of them (Cohorts 3, 10, 12; yielding a frequency for ketamine/xylazine-induced damage of 42% for corneas within responding cohorts and 26% inclusive of all cohorts). Although we were unable to isolate a factor explaining this variability, it remains possible that a nuance of procedure, environment, or physiology may in fact explain this phenomenon.
It is important to draw a distinction between statistically supported conclusions of our study (i.e., ketamine/xylazine increases the incidence of band keratopathy in mice) versus several observations that do not rigorously distinguish various mechanisms. As discussed above, the cohort-to-cohort variability makes this phenotype difficult to study. Regarding incidence, based on our past experiences using ketamine/xylazine with mice[11, 36, 37], we anecdotally have the impression that damage is more likely to occur in young mice (< 1 mo of age), but our current study was not sufficiently powered to test this robustly. With respect to mechanism, it’s important to point out that our current results do not distinguish whether this occurs due primarily to a drug interaction (ketamine, xylazine, or their combined use), or a secondary physiological consequence such as decreased body temperature, corneal desiccation, or time under anesthesia. Regarding prevention, although we observed indications that petrolatum-based ointment and careful monitoring of body temperature may reduce the incidence of corneal opacities, we have added yohimbine to our standard anesthesia protocol because it was the most effective and efficient solution in our hands.
In sum, we have observed that ketamine/xylazine anesthesia induces corneal damage in mice. A small body of literature from experiments in rats might have predicted this phenomenon, but our unfamiliarity with it–perhaps the unfamiliarity of most in our field–caused an experimental complication with our intended experiments. The precise age-dependency, strain-dependency, and mechanism of this phenomenon remain ill-defined, so we encourage investigators to examine its influence more closely in their own experiments.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the following: National Institutes of Health EY021436 (to DK) (http://www.nih.gov/) and National Institutes of Health EY017673 and EY018825 (to MGA) (http://www.nih.gov/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Bartsch U, Galliciotti G, Jofre GF, Jankowiak W, Hagel C, Braulke T. Apoptotic photoreceptor loss and altered expression of lysosomal proteins in the nclf mouse model of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(10):6952–9. 10.1167/iovs.13-12945 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, Chesler EJ, et al. High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity outbred population. Genetics. 2012;190(2):437–47. 10.1534/genetics.111.132597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dursun I, Jakubowska-Dogru E, van der List D, Liets LC, Coombs JL, Berman RF. Effects of early postnatal exposure to ethanol on retinal ganglion cell morphology and numbers of neurons in the dorsolateral geniculate in mice. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2011;35(11):2063–74. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01557.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mao M, Hedberg-Buenz A, Koehn D, John SW, Anderson MG. Anterior segment dysgenesis and early-onset glaucoma in nee mice with mutation of Sh3pxd2b. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2679–88. 10.1167/iovs.10-5993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Seo S, Mullins RF, Dumitrescu AV, Bhattarai S, Gratie D, Wang K, et al. Subretinal gene therapy of mice with Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(9):6118–32. 10.1167/iovs.13-11673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Son AI, Cooper MA, Sheleg M, Sun Y, Kleiman NJ, Zhou R. Further analysis of the lens of ephrin-A5-/- mice: development of postnatal defects. Molecular vision. 2013;19:254–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Graw J. Mouse models of cataract. Journal of genetics. 2009;88(4):469–86. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Islam MS. Animal models of diabetic neuropathy: progress since 1960s. Journal of diabetes research. 2013;2013:149452 10.1155/2013/149452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. McKinnon SJ, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. Mouse models of retinal ganglion cell death and glaucoma. Experimental eye research. 2009;88(4):816–24. 10.1016/j.exer.2008.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pennesi ME, Neuringer M, Courtney RJ. Animal models of age related macular degeneration. Molecular aspects of medicine. 2012;33(4):487–509. 10.1016/j.mam.2012.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lively GD, Jiang B, Hedberg-Buenz A, Chang B, Petersen GE, Wang K, et al. Genetic dependence of central corneal thickness among inbred strains of mice. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2010;51(1):160–71. Epub 2009/08/28. 10.1167/iovs.09-3429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Song J, Lee YG, Houston J, Petroll WM, Chakravarti S, Cavanagh HD, et al. Neonatal corneal stromal development in the normal and lumican-deficient mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(2):548–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zieske JD. Corneal development associated with eyelid opening. The International journal of developmental biology. 2004;48(8–9):903–11. 10.1387/ijdb.041860jz . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eagle RC. Eye pathology: an atlas and text, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fario QA, Sugar A. Conjunctival and corneal degenerations In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology, 2nd Ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gaertner DJ, Hallman TM, Hankenson FC, Batchelder MA. Anesthesia and analgesia for laboratory rodents In: Fish RE, Brown MJ, Danneman PJ, Karas AZ, editors. Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory animals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Stokes EL, Flecknell PA, Richardson CA. Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to rodents undergoing experimental surgical procedures. Lab Anim. 2009;43(2):149–54. Epub 2009/01/01. 10.1258/la.2008.008020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Calderone L, Grimes P, Shalev M. Acute reversible cataract induced by xylazine and by ketamine-xylazine anesthesia in rats and mice. Experimental eye research. 1986;42(4):331–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ding C, Wang P, Tian N. Effect of general anesthetics on IOP in elevated IOP mouse model. Experimental eye research. 2011;92(6):512–20. 10.1016/j.exer.2011.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Qiu Y, Yang H, Lei B. Effects of Three Commonly Used Anesthetics on Intraocular Pressure in Mouse. Curr Eye Res. 2013. 10.3109/02713683.2013.845224 . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21. Guillet R, Wyatt J, Baggs RB, Kellogg CK. Anesthetic-induced corneal lesions in developmentally sensitive rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(6):949–54. Epub 1988/06/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tita B, Leone MG, Casini ML, Corubolo C, Bordi F, Guidolin D, et al. Corneal toxicity of xylazine and clonidine, in combination with ketamine, in the rat. Ophthalmic Res. 2001;33(6):345–52. Epub 2001/11/27. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Turner PV, Albassam MA. Susceptibility of rats to corneal lesions after injectable anesthesia. Comp Med. 2005;55(2):175–82. Epub 2005/05/12. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hoffman RW, Yang HK, Waggie KS, Durham JB, Burge JR, Walker SE. Band keratopathy in MRL/l and MRL/n mice. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1983;26(5):645–52. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jhanji V, Rapuano CJ, Vajpayee RB. Corneal calcific band keratopathy. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2011;22(4):283–9. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283477d36 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jones NP. Uveitis, 2nd Ed. London, UK: JP Medical Ltd.; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 27. O'Connor GR. Calcific band keratopathy. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1972;70:58–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sinner B, Graf BM. Ketamine. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(182):313–33. Epub 2008/01/05. 10.1007/978-3-540-74806-9_15 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Greene SA, Thurmon JC. Xylazine—a review of its pharmacology and use in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1988;11(4):295–313. Epub 1988/12/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bergman SA. Ketamine: review of its pharmacology and its use in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1999;46(1):10–20. Epub 1999/11/07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Skolnick P, Popik P, Trullas R. Glutamate-based antidepressants: 20 years on. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30(11):563–9. Epub 2009/10/20. 10.1016/j.tips.2009.09.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bhutta AT. Ketamine: a controversial drug for neonates. Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(5):303–8. Epub 2007/10/02. 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dolansky G, Shah A, Mosdossy G, Rieder M. What is the evidence for the safety and efficacy of using ketamine in children? Paediatr Child Health. 2008;13(4):307–8. Epub 2009/04/02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Starte JM, Fung AT, Kerdraon YA. Ketamine-associated corneal edema. Cornea. 2012;31(5):572–4. Epub 2012/02/16. 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8af4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wood D, Cottrell A, Baker SC, Southgate J, Harris M, Fulford S, et al. Recreational ketamine: from pleasure to pain. BJU Int. 2011;107(12):1881–4. Epub 2011/02/15. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10031.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lively GD, Koehn D, Hedberg-Buenz A, Wang K, Anderson MG. Quantitative trait loci associated with murine central corneal thickness. Physiological genomics. 2010;42(2):281–6. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00140.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Anderson MG, Libby RT, Mao M, Cosma IM, Wilson LA, Smith RS, et al. Genetic context determines susceptibility to intraocular pressure elevation in a mouse pigmentary glaucoma. BMC biology. 2006;4:20 Epub 2006/07/11. 10.1186/1741-7007-4-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.