Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Immunol. 2008;98:121–149. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00404-5

B Cells and Autoantibodies in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis and Related Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases

Katherine A McLaughlin *,, Kai W Wucherpfennig *,†,
PMCID: PMC4520528  NIHMSID: NIHMS710407  PMID: 18772005

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The mainstream view is that MS is caused by an autoimmune attack of the CNS myelin by myelin-specific CD4 T cells, and this perspective is supported by extensive work in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS as well as immunological and genetic studies in humans. However, it is important to keep in mind that other cell populations of the immune system are also essential in the complex series of events leading to MS, as exemplified by the profound clinical efficacy of B cell depletion with Rituximab. This review discusses the mechanisms by which B cells contribute to the pathogenesis of MS and dissects their role as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to T cells with matching antigen specificity, the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as the secretion of autoantibodies that target structures on the myelin sheath and the axon. Mechanistic dissection of the interplay between T cells and B cells in MS may permit the development of B cell based therapies that do not require depletion of this important cell population.

1. MS AND RELATED INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING CNS DISEASES

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological disease in young adults, affecting over 250,000 individuals in the United States and up to 1.2 million worldwide. It is believed to result from an autoimmune attack on protein components of myelin, the insulation which allows for rapid conductance of electrical signals along axons. MS is characterized by discrete regions of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation, lymphocyte infiltration, demyelination, axonal damage, and ultimately the death of myelin-producing oligodendrocytes. Depending on the localization of these plaques, MS patients suffer from a wide variety of symptoms, including weakness, sensory disturbances, ataxia, and visual impairment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows visualization of active lesions in the absence of clinical symptoms, and has become a valuable tool for both diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity. A diagnosis of MS requires multiple episodes of demyelination separated in space and time (Poser et al., 1983), which may be supported by clinical evidence of multiple demyelinating events or the presence of multiple lesions of different age on MRI (McDonald et al., 2001). On the basis of the temporal pattern of demyelinating events and accumulation of permanent disability, MS is classified into relapsing-remitting (RR), secondary progressive (SP), and primary progressive (PP) types (Hauser and Oksenberg, 2006; Noseworthy et al., 2000). About 80–85% of MS patients initially experience a relapsing-remitting course (RRMS) and the intervals between and duration of relapses are highly variable, not necessarily correlating with the presence of lesions by MRI because most lesions are clinically silent (Goodin, 2006). Over time, many RRMS patients develop a progressive worsening of symptoms between relapses, known as SPMS. Cumulative axonal loss may be an important contributor to the progressive decline in neurological function (Hauser and Oksenberg, 2006; Sospedra and Martin, 2005; Trapp et al., 1998). Within 15 years of diagnosis, 50–60% of RRMS patients cannot walk unassisted, and 70% are limited in performing activities central to daily life (Hauser and Oksenberg, 2006). The remaining 15–20% of patients experience a progressive pattern of disease (PPMS), characterized by a gradual accumulation of symptoms and concurrent decline in function. The progression of disability occurs despite a lower frequency of active (gadolinium-enhancing) lesions by MRI relative to RRMS (Thompson et al., 1997).

MS is a complex disease, with contributions from multiple genetic and environmental factors. The frequency of MS varies between ethnic populations (Rosati, 2001), and descendents of Northern Europeans have an increased prevalence relative to African, Asian, and Native American populations. The relative risk of developing MS is significantly higher for individuals with an affected first- or second-degree relative (Chataway et al., 1998; Hauser and Oksenberg, 2006). The MHC locus on human chromosome 6 shows the strongest linkage to disease susceptibility, in particular the MHC class II region and a specific MHC class II haplotype (DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602) (Haines et al., 1996; Sawcer et al., 1996). Recent genome-wide studies have also identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IL-2 receptor alpha and IL-7 receptor alpha chains (The International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, 2007), again indicating that genetic variations of immune response genes contribute to MS susceptibility. Women are affected by MS twice as frequently as men, which may be due to genetic or hormonal factors (Czlonkowska et al., 2005).

A large body of work in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS indicates that CD4 T cells specific for myelin antigens are essential for the development of inflammatory, demyelinating CNS lesions. EAE can be induced by immunization with myelin proteins or peptides in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) or by transfer of myelin-specific T cell clones (Stromnes and Goverman, 2006a,b). Linkage of disease susceptibility to the MHC class II locus in MS indicates that peptide presentation to CD4 T cells is also important in the human disease. Even though disease can be transferred with purified T cells with a single antigen specificity, it is important to keep in mind that other cell populations of the immune system also play an essential role, as exemplified by the clinical trials with Rituximab which depletes B cells. The function of B cells in the chronic inflammatory process in MS will be discussed in detail.

1.1. Related demyelinating CNS diseases

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and clinically isolated demyelinating syndromes (CIS) are part of the spectrum of inflammatory demyelinating CNS diseases. CIS is an isolated demyelinating event, and 50–95% of CIS cases are diagnosed with MS following a second demyelinating episode (Miller, 2004). Initiation of therapy with interferon beta at the time of CIS has been shown to significantly prevent or delay progression to MS, especially in patients with multiple MRI lesions who may be at higher risk (Kappos et al., 2007; Miller, 2004; Thrower, 2007).

NMO (also known as Devic’s disease) primarily affects the optic nerve and spinal cord, leading to the defining symptoms of optic neuritis and transverse myelitis (Wingerchuk et al., 2006). Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions are commonly found in NMO, although clinically silent brain lesions may also be seen on MRI. NMO is found in populations with a low incidence of MS, and affects women up to nine times more often than men. The majority of cases follow a relapsing course with incomplete recovery between episodes, but NMO has a worse long-term prognosis than does MS. More than 50% of patients are blind in at least one eye or cannot walk unassisted five years following diagnosis (Wingerchuk et al., 2007). The recent discovery of a specific autoantibody in approximately 75% of NMO patients has aided in diagnosis and provided a therapeutic target, as discussed later in this chapter.

ADEM, as the name implies, is an acute and often rapidly progressing demyelinating condition and is more common in children than adults (Tenembaum et al., 2007). Patients with ADEM typically have a variety of neurological symptoms and diagnosis requires the presence of encephalopathy, defined as a change in behavior or consciousness (Krupp et al., 2007; Tenembaum et al., 2007). ADEM often occurs within 4 weeks of infection or vaccination, although a causative relationship with infection can be difficult to establish. While the majority of ADEM patients experience a monophasic disease course with partial or complete recovery, some have a recurrence of the same symptoms and lesion location more than 3 months following the initial event (recurrent ADEM) or experience new lesions and symptoms (multiphasic ADEM) (Krupp et al., 2007). A minority of individuals with ADEM can later develop MS, although the reported frequency of this occurrence is highly variable (0–28%) (Dale et al., 2000; Leake et al., 2004; Mikaeloff et al., 2004, 2007; Tenembaum et al., 2002), requires many years of follow-up, and is dependent on the criteria used to define MS. For instance, Poser’s criteria (Poser et al., 1983) would consider multiphasic ADEM as MS, as both are a recurring demyelinating events separated in space and time. The overlapping symptoms and lack of specific biomarkers can cause difficulties in distinguishing between MS and ADEM, especially in pediatric populations (Belman et al., 2007; Krupp et al., 2007; Wingerchuk, 2003).

2. THERAPEUTIC DEPLETION OF B CELLS IN MS WITH RITUXIMAB

Recent clinical trials with Rituximab have shown that B cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS. Rituximab (marketed by Genentech as Rituxan®) is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of B cells, but absent from fully differentiated plasma cells (Sabahi and Anolik, 2006). Administration of this antibody rapidly depletes CD20-expressing cells from the circulation via complement-mediated lysis and cell-mediated cytotoxicity (Reff et al., 1994), and B cell numbers remain low for 3–12 months following treatment. Rituximab has been in use as a treatment for non-Hodgkin’s B cell lymphomas since FDA approval in 1997 and has shown an excellent safety profile (Rastetter et al., 2004). Most adverse events are related to the antibody infusion process, while recurrent infections occur at a similar frequency as in placebo control groups and opportunistic infections are rare. The preservation of antibody secretion by plasma cells may explain the low incidence of infection.

The efficacy and safety profile of Rituximab prompted its clinical testing in complex antibody-associated autoimmune diseases, initially rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Edwards et al., 2004). A phase III trial reported the combined use of methotrexate and Rituximab in patients with established RA who had previously failed tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-directed therapies (Cohen et al., 2006). Treatment with Rituximab resulted in a significant reduction of disease severity compared to methotrexate alone, while patients in the control group experienced a worsening of RA symptoms. The response was not associated with a reduction in rheumatoid factor antibodies, and the mean serum levels of IgM, IgG, and IgA generally stayed within normal limits through the trial period. A follow-up study demonstrated the safety of subsequent infusions following B cell repopulation, with no increase in the infection rate (Keystone et al., 2007). On the basis of these results, Rituximab was approved in 2006 for use in RA patients who do not respond to TNF-antagonists (Sabahi and Anolik, 2006). Rituximab has also shown benefit in several other autoimmune diseases, including autoantibody-associated neuropathies, immune thrombocytopenia and systemic lupus erythematosus (Edwards and Cambridge, 2006; Renaud et al., 2003, 2006; Sabahi and Anolik, 2006; Tanaka et al., 2007).

A recent phase II randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of Rituximab in RRMS showed substantial clinical benefit (Hauser et al., 2008). Following the single infusion of antibody, depletion of B cells was rapid and persisted for greater than 24 weeks. The total number of lesions and number of new lesions were dramatically reduced in the treatment compared to control group, with 89.4% of patients in the treatment group experiencing one or fewer total lesions over the course of the trial. About 84.8% of patients receiving Rituximab had no new lesions, and although highly variable, the volume of lesions was decreased in the treatment group but increased in controls. The decrease in lesion activity was accompanied by a reduction in clinical relapses. The infection rate was similar in both groups, and no significant opportunistic infections were observed. These promising results are certain to be followed up with a large phase III trial to address safety and long-term efficacy issues. Smaller preceding trials support these findings. A report of one RRMS patient receiving two doses of Rituximab showed effective depletion of B cells for six months in both peripheral blood and CSF, and a complete absence of relapses and new lesions for nine months (Stuve et al., 2005). A small trial in PPMS demonstrated rapid and effective peripheral B cell depletion, but an overall increase in CSF B cell frequencies after 2–18 months (Monson et al., 2005). The majority of these cells were plasma cells, which are not targeted by Rituximab. In a larger study using Rituximab as an add-on therapy for RRMS patients with suboptimal responses to current treatment, B and T cell numbers were reduced in CSF following treatment, but no significant changes were observed in the number of oligoclonal bands, CSF IgG concentration or disability scores (Cross et al., 2006). No serious complications or infections were observed in any of these trials. Rituximab may also be useful for the treatment of other inflammatory demyelinating CNS diseases. Treatment with Rituximab led to significant neurological improvement in seven of eight NMO patients, including recovery of walking ability and regain of bladder and bowel control (Cree et al., 2005), although the possibility of spontaneous recovery was not addressed with a control group in this open label trial.

3. WHICH B CELL FUNCTIONS ARE CRITICAL IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF MS?

It is obvious why Rituximab is an effective treatment for lymphoma – it eliminates the transformed cells. It is more difficult to dissect why treatment with Rituximab has such a profound effect on MS. The contribution of B cells may go beyond antibody production – B cells are potent APCs and the B cell – T cell interaction shapes the ensuing T cell response through expression of costimulatory molecules as well as production of cytokines and chemokines.

3.1. B cells as antigen presenting cells

Unlike other professional APCs, B cells have the unique capability to efficiently capture even minute amounts of antigen through the B cell receptor (BCR) (Fig. 4.1). B cells are thus the most efficient APCs for T cells with the same antigen specificity (Lanzavecchia, 1985). Antigen presentation by B cells is closely linked to activation. When crosslinked by a bound protein, the BCR signaling subunits (Ig-α and Ig-β) trigger receptor ubiquitination, internalization and targeting to an endocytic compartment optimized for peptide loading onto class II MHC (Drake et al., 2006; West et al., 1994). There, the BCR-associated protein antigen is degraded into peptides for presentation by MHC class II molecules. Intracellular trafficking of MHC class II molecules is also modulated by BCR ligation to promote maximal loading of antigen-derived peptides, even when present in low abundance (Vascotto et al., 2007). Activation also induces recruitment of HLA-DM to this compartment (Lankar et al., 2002) which catalyzes the exchange of low affinity MHC-associated peptides with higher affinity peptides; these complexes are subsequently transported to the cell surface for recognition by CD4 T cells. Costimulatory molecules including CD80, CD86, and ICOS ligand are also upregulated on the B cell surface following activation (Cambier et al., 1994; Shilling et al., 2006), and promote T cell activation upon peptide–MHC binding. Antigen-specific B and T cells form long-lasting immune synapses characterized by accumulation of peptide–MHC complexes at the site of cell-cell contact (Gordy et al., 2004). The coordination of antigen uptake, class II loading, and costimulatory molecule expression allows antigen-specific B cells to activate cognate T cells far more efficiently than nonspecific B cells or monocytes (Lanzavecchia, 1985), and antigen-specific B cells are required to prime CD4 T cells with low doses of antigen (Rivera et al., 2001). In addition to directly presenting antigens to autoreactive T cells, live B cells can also transfer antigen to macrophages by cell–cell contact, but the precise mechanism of this transfer is unknown (Harvey et al., 2007; Townsend and Goodnow, 1998).

FIGURE 4.1.

FIGURE 4.1

Antigen presentation by B cells to T cells with matching specificity. Crosslinking of the BCR by antigen induces signaling events leading to B cell activation and receptor endocytosis (1). MHC class II molecules assemble in the ER with the invariant chain (2). The internalized antigen is targeted to an intracellular compartment enriched in MHC (3), where proteases break down the antigen into peptides. In this compartment, the invariant is proteolytically cleaved such that only the CLIP peptide remains bound. DM facilitates the exchange of the MHC-associated CLIP for other peptides, including those derived from the endocytosed antigen. MHC molecules bearing high affinity peptides leave the loading compartment and are exported to the cell surface with co-stimulatory molecules (4). Antigen-derived peptide-MHC complexes can then activate specific CD4 T cells. Initial T cell activation leads to expression of CD40 ligand, which provides signals required for B cell survival and differentiation into memory cells through CD40 on the B cell surface.

In the context of autoimmunity, which can be dominated by low-affinity T cells and limiting amounts of antigen, the potent APC function of B cells may be harmful. The immunodominant antibody epitope of myelin basic protein (MBP) colocalizes with a major T cell epitope of the antigen (Wucherpfennig et al., 1997), and binding to the BCR may thus protect the immunodominant epitope of MBP from degradation and promote its presentation to T cells. Similarly, the major epitope recognized by high-affinity insulin-specific autoantibodies is located in the same segment of the target antigen as the T cell epitope. The presence of autoantibodies with this specificity is highly predictive of later development of type 1 diabetes (Achenbach et al., 2004; Kent et al., 2005).

In an immune response to a pathogen, B cells are activated in a lymph node by antigen binding to the BCR, migrate to follicles, and continue to undergo antigen-driven maturation by forming germinal centers (MacLennan, 1994). Follicular dendritic cells display native proteins in the form of immune complexes to B cells, which take up the antigen though the BCR, process it and present antigen-derived peptides to CD4 T cells (McHeyzer-Williams et al., 2006). In turn, T cells recognizing peptide-MHC complexes on the B cell become activated, upregulate expression of stimulatory molecules including CD40 ligand (CD154), and secrete cytokines, providing antigen-dependent survival and differentiation signals to the B cell. After acquiring T cell help, B cells rapidly undergo several rounds of proliferation in the germinal center, during which time the immunoglobulin variable sequences are mutated (Klein and Dalla-Favera, 2008; MacLennan, 1994). The resulting daughter cells once again sample antigens on follicular dendritic cells (FDCs), present peptides to T cells, and obtain survival signals.

Because the germinal center reaction is highly competitive, B cells containing rearranged receptors with lower affinity for antigen do not receive the required signals from T cells and undergo death by apoptosis. Cells with higher affinity for antigen proliferate and leave the follicle as memory B cells or plasmablasts, the precursors of long-lived plasma cells. Although capable of establishing residence in the bone marrow, newly generated plasma cells can also traffic to sites of inflammation by chemokine and integrin dependent homing (Kunkel and Butcher, 2003). The process of immunoglobulin diversification in germinal centers can give rise to self-reactive B cells, which should undergo apoptosis in the absence of cognate T cell interactions. However, the mechanisms of central and peripheral T cell tolerance are not perfect, and cells which escape can promote the survival and maturation of autoreactive B cells. The control of self-reactive B and T cell activation are closely linked in the germinal center reaction, making it an attractive target for treatment of autoimmune diseases.

There is substantial evidence for such antigen-driven B cell responses in MS. Structures similar to lymph node B cell follicles, termed tertiary lymphoid organs, develop in the target organs of inflammatory autoimmune diseases and are induced by a positive feedback loop of tissue chemokine expression, lymphocyte recruitment and activation, and cytokine production (Aloisi and Pujol-Borrell, 2006). Follicles containing B cells and FDCs can be found in the meninges of patients with secondary-progressive MS, and their presence is associated with a younger age of onset and more severe pathology (Magliozzi et al., 2007; Serafini et al., 2004). Similar structures have also been found in mice with progressive relapsing EAE (Magliozzi et al., 2004). The formation of these ectopic follicles indicates that B cells migrate to the brain, are activated locally and present antigens, and differentiate into memory B cells or plasmablasts within the CNS, rather than being activated in the periphery and homing to the CNS in a fully mature state. The establishment of germinal centers in the brain may reflect differences in the immune response in RRMS and SPMS (Lyons et al., 1999; Magliozzi et al., 2007).

An important role for antigen presentation by B cells has also been demonstrated in mouse models of autoimmunity. Mice with a mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (mIgM mice) express membrane-bound BCR but cannot secrete antibodies. When bred onto autoimmune-prone backgrounds such as NOD or MRL/lpr, mIgM mice developed type 1 diabetes and lupus nephritis, respectively (Chan et al., 1999a; Wong et al., 2004), while B cell deficient mice are resistant to the development of these autoimmune diseases (Chan and Shlomchik, 1998; Chan et al., 1999b; Serreze et al., 1996).

A strong B cell dependence has also been found in particular EAE models in which myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is used as the target antigen. These studies showed that B cells are required for the development of severe EAE following immunization with whole MOG protein, but are dispensable following MOG peptide immunization (Hjelmstrom et al., 1998; Svensson et al., 2002). The models involving immunization with whole proteins may be more relevant to the human disease because APCs in MS lesions phagocytose large fragments of myelin containing intact proteins. The differences between protein and peptide immunization may at least in part be due to the dose of the immunogen: smaller molar quantities are typically administered when intact proteins are utilized and the efficient antigen presentation function of B cells may then be critical. Furthermore, T cell–B cell collaboration can result in the production of conformation-sensitive antibodies which can induce demyelination. In contrast, peptide immunization only induces antibodies against this linear epitope and such antibodies do not bind to native MOG (von Budingen et al., 2004).

The synergistic action of myelin-specific T cells and B cells has also been highlighted by recently developed spontaneous models of CNS autoimmunity. Mice that only express a transgenic MOG-specific TCR develop isolated optic neuritis in the absence of classical EAE symptoms (Bettelli et al., 2003). Breeding of these TCR transgenic mice with an anti-MOG heavy chain knock-in results in a high frequency of MOG-specific T cells and B cells and an aggressive autoimmune disease in which lesions are largely confined to the optic nerves and spinal cord, as seen in NMO (Bettelli et al., 2006; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2006).

3.2. B cells as a source of cytokines

The costimulatory molecules and cytokines present during antigen recognition by a naive T cell determine whether that cell becomes activated and what effector phenotype it acquires. As shown in Figure 4.2, activated B cells can be induced to produce a variety of immunomodulatory cytokines and growth factors (Pistoia, 1997). B cells can differentiate into effector subsets with distinct cytokine profiles, both in vitro and in vivo. Production of type I cytokines, including interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-12, induces T cells to adopt a Th1 phenotype characterized by expression of IFN-γ. This type of response is optimized for the clearance of intracellular pathogens and leads to activation of cytotoxic CD8 T cells, NK cells, and production of complement-fixing antibody isotypes, which can all contribute to tissue damage in autoimmune diseases. TNFα production by B cells can also amplify Th1 differentiation and IFNγ production by T cells (Menard et al., 2007). B cell derived IL-6, in combination with TGFβ, promotes T cell differentiation into highly pathogenic Th17 cells, which secrete high levels of IL-17 and other proinflammatory cytokines (Bettelli et al., 2007). Secretion of type 2 cytokines by B cells is associated with development of Th2 cells, which modulate inflammation by production of cytokines that promote the clearance of extracellular pathogens (Harris et al., 2000). Although characteristic of allergies, Th2 responses are protective in MS and animal models, and are promoted by approved MS therapies, including interferon β and glatiramer acetate (Sospedra and Martin, 2005).

FIGURE 4.2.

FIGURE 4.2

B cell-derived cytokines direct the ensuing immune response. Antigen-specific immune responses are perpetuated by collaboration of T and B cells in germinal centers, the formation of which is dependent on production of lymphotoxin α and TNF by activated B cells. The cytokines present during antigen presentation to T cells determine their effector phenotype. In the presence of IL-4, T cells follow the Th2 maturation pathway, which is involved in allergic responses and protective in MS. Expression of IL-12 or TGFβ and IL-6 by APCs lead to differentiation of proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cells, respectively, which are pathogenic in animal models of MS. These proinflammatory cells can be inhibited by IL-10, produced by APCs and a subset of regulatory T cells.

B cell-derived cytokines are also critical for the establishment of germinal centers in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues. In mice, expression of lymphotoxin (LT) and TNF by B cells is required for the maturation of follicular dendritic cells and organization of germinal centers in the spleen (Endres et al., 1999; Fu et al., 1998; Gonzalez et al., 1998). The induction of lymphoid follicles in the gut and at sites of inflammation is also dependent on provision of LT by B cells (Gommerman and Browning, 2003; Lorenz et al., 2003). Ectopic germinal centers are formed in the CNS of MS patients, and both TNF and LT have been detected in lesions (Selmaj et al., 1991). Increased levels of serum TNF and LT have also been detected in MS patients, although other studies have not found a difference between MS and controls (Ledeen and Chakraborty, 1998). Monoclonal antibody inhibitors of TNF are approved therapies for RA, but MS patients receiving treatment had an increased attack rate relative to controls, and a clinical trial was discontinued prematurely due to this negative outcome (The Lenercept Multiple Sclerosis Study Group, 1999).

The context of activation plays an important role in determining the cytokine profile of a B cell: activation through the BCR with T cell help (CD40 ligation) leads to production of proinflammatory cytokines, while ligation of CD40 in the absence of specific BCR activation promotes secretion of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 (Duddy et al., 2004). IL-10 has potent antiinflammatory properties and can inhibit antigen presentation to CD4 T cells, indirectly downregulating their activation, cytokine production, and proliferation (Roncarolo et al., 2006). Production of IL-10 by B cells is essential for recovery from MOG peptide-induced EAE (Fillatreau et al., 2002), and overexpression of IL-10 protects mice from EAE (Cua et al., 1999). B cells from MS patients produce less IL-10 than B cells from healthy individuals, but high levels of IL-10 and TGF-β are produced by newly generated B cells following Rituximab treatment (Duddy et al., 2007).

The antigen-driven B cell maturation process in the MS brain is made possible by local changes in the immune environment. Expression of the lymphocyte adhesion molecule LFA-1 is increased in active MS plaques relative to noninflammatory neurological diseases (Cannella and Raine, 1995), signifying the active migration of cells into the plaque. Under normal conditions, astrocytes maintain an immunosuppressive cytokine environment in the CNS, with detectable levels of IL-10 and TGFβ but no TNF (Hickey, 2001). In MS, the balance of cytokines is tipped towards inflammation rather than tolerance, with increased levels of IL-1, IL-2, TNF, and IFNγ (Cannella and Raine, 1995). Normally secreted at low levels by astrocytes, the potent B cell activating factor BAFF is upregulated in MS, to levels comparable to secondary lymphoid tissues (Krumbholz et al., 2005). Autoreactive B cells compete poorly with non-autoreactive cells for BAFF-induced survival signals, and mice engineered to overexpress BAFF develop B cell-associated autoimmunity (Lesley et al., 2004). Regulation of local BAFF concentration can be an effective method of preventing autoimmunity, and loss of this control contributes to autoreactive B cell proliferation and survival in the brains of MS patients.

3.3. Autoantibody production by B cells

B cells are unique in their ability to produce antibodies, which circulate throughout the body and target specific antigen-bearing targets for clearance. Antibodies to self proteins are directly responsible for the pathology in both systemic and organ-specific autoimmune diseases, and have multiple mechanisms of causing tissue damage. In some cases, autoantibodies are directed to a cell-surface receptor, such as the acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis or the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor in Grave’s disease (Kohn and Harii, 2003; Vincent, 2002). Antibodies can also form immune complexes with circulating autoantigens, which accumulate in the kidneys and joint synovium in patients with SLE and RA (Davidson and Aranow, 2006; Dorner et al., 2004; Rahman and Isenberg, 2008; Singh, 2005). Other autoantibodies bind to circulating cells such as platelets or erythrocytes, triggering complement-mediated lysis or phagocytosis by Fc-receptor bearing cells (Elson and Barker, 2000). Much effort has been placed on determining the specificities of antibodies found in the lesions, serum, and CSF of patients with MS and related demyelinating diseases, and a wide variety of antibody targets on myelin, axons, and astrocytes have been studied (Fig. 4.3).

FIGURE 4.3.

FIGURE 4.3

Locations of autoantibody targets in the CNS. Oligodendrocytes (blue) ensheath axons with the spiral myelin membrane, a specialized extension of the plasma membrane. Each oligodendrocyte produces a segmental myelin structure for several surrounding axons. MBP and PLP are the primary protein components of myelin, but are located within the many layers and therefore unavailable to antibody binding in noninjured myelin. Although less abundant, MOG is specifically expressed on the outer surface of myelin, making it a target for demyelinating antibodies. Antibodies to neurofascin, found at the myelin-axon junction and exposed on axons at the nodes of Ranvier, can contribute to both demyelination and axonal damage. Specific lipids and glycolipids can be released from the membranes of damaged oligodendrocytes, and are also recognized by antibodies in MS. The foot processes of astrocytes (green) form the blood-brain barrier which restricts access of molecules from the circulatory system to the CNS. Aquaporin-4, a water channel, is enriched in these structures, and is the target of autoantibodies specifically found in NMO.

A common finding in MS patients is the intrathecal synthesis of IgG: oligoclonal IgG bands are detectable in more than 95% of MS patients and increased CSF concentrations of IgG relative to albumin are found in up to 70% of cases (Link and Huang, 2006). The oligoclonal nature of these antibodies suggests an antigen-driven process, and determining the specificities of such antibodies could thus provide insights into the causes of MS. Several candidate autoantigens have been proposed as targets, as well as antigens from infectious agents, but there is currently no agreement on the specificities or significance of oligoclonal bands in MS, although they are the only immunological feature used to support the diagnosis (Cepok et al., 2005; Correale and de los Milagros Bassani Molinas, 2002; Franciotta et al., 2005).

Clonally expanded B cells have been detected by single-cell PCR in the cerebrospinal fluid and lesions of patients with MS and optic neuritis, and one study found expansion of MBP-specific B cells in the CSF (Lambracht-Washington et al., 2007). The immunoglobulin gene rearrangements found in CSF B cells are rarely observed in the periphery (Colombo et al., 2000), and memory B cells and plasma cells with similar rearrangements have been detected in the same patient (Haubold et al., 2004). These cells carry mutations typical of germinal center-derived memory B cells (Harp et al., 2007), with overrepresentation of specific immunoglobulin variable regions, especially VH4 (Baranzini et al., 1999; Owens et al., 1998). The variable region sequences of MS lesion-resident B cells are mutated to a similar extent as those in B cells undergoing an antigen-driven response to CNS measles virus infection (Smith-Jensen et al., 2000). Together, these findings provide support for a local antigen-dependent B cell maturation process in the CNS of MS patients.

Histological analysis of MS tissue has demonstrated deposition of antibodies and complement on the myelin sheath of a substantial fraction of lesions, but also indicated significant heterogeneity in the composition of demyelinating lesions. Lucchinetti and colleagues have classified MS lesion biopsies into four categories based on the observed inflammatory and neurodegenerative characteristics (Lassmann et al., 2001; Lucchinetti et al., 2000). The first two patterns are characterized by demarcated regions of infiltrating T cells and activated macrophages, centered around small veins. Areas of demyelination, with a simultaneous loss of multiple myelin proteins including MBP, MOG, proteolipid protein (PLP), and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), and remyelination were observed in both patterns. The presence (pattern II) or absence (pattern I) of antibody and complement deposition distinguishes these two types of lesions, suggestive of different levels of B cell involvement. Infiltrating T cells and macrophages were also found in pattern III and IV lesions, but other features pointed to an oligodendrocyte defect with a preferential loss of MAG (pattern III) or nearly complete loss of oligodendrocytes (pattern IV) and complete lack of remyelination. Although different between patients, the patterns observed in multiple lesions from the same patient were always identical. Pattern II lesions were the most common, observed in 115 areas from 16/27 patients and including all clinical subtypes of MS. Pattern III lesions were primarily found in acute disease, with a duration of less than 2 months before biopsy, and although rare, pattern IV was only found in primary-progressive MS. The IgG found in pattern II lesions may directly contribute to disease progression, as patients with pattern II lesions, but not pattern I or III, respond to therapeutic plasma exchange (Keegan et al., 2005). Development of novel methods for determining the composition of lesions may enable classification of MS based on the mechanism of pathogenesis rather than clinical presentation and facilitate individualized treatments.

Antibodies specific for myelin (Genain et al., 1999; O’Connor et al., 2005; Warren and Catz, 1993) and axonal proteins (Mathey et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2005) have been eluted from MS lesions. The terminal complement complex C9neo is also found in active lesions containing IgG (Prineas and Graham, 1981; Storch et al., 1998). Histological analysis of lesions has also shown active phagocytosis of antibody-decorated myelin by macrophages and opsonized myelin fragments have been detected within endocytic vesicles (Prineas and Graham, 1981; Storch et al., 1998). Although IgG-containing lesions can be found in all types of MS, different antigens may be targeted in different subtypes.

MOG has been extensively studied as a target for autoantibodies in MS because it is selectively expressed by oligodendrocytes in the CNS. Unlike intracellular antigens such as MBP and PLP, MOG is localized to the surface of oligodendrocytes and the myelin sheath and therefore available for antibody binding in the absence of prior tissue damage (Brunner et al., 1989). MOG was originally discovered by affinity purification with the well-characterized 8–18C5 antibody (Linington et al., 1984), which recognizes a conformational epitope and can exacerbate demyelination when administered to animals with mild EAE (Breithaupt et al., 2003; Linington et al., 1988). Administration of antibodies to MOG to a healthy mouse cannot cause disease, as the blood–brain barrier must be compromised to allow access to the target antigen. The conformation-specific antibodies produced following immunization with refolded MOG protein can directly contribute to demyelination in both rodents and nonhuman primates and also exacerbate EAE by passive transfer (Genain et al., 1995; Lyons et al., 2002; von Budingen et al., 2002). However, antibodies to linear epitopes or peptides cannot bind MOG on the cell surface and are not pathogenic (Brehm et al., 1999; von Budingen et al., 2004).

The ability of conformation-sensitive antibodies to exacerbate demyelination in animal models has made MOG an attractive candidate antigen for autoantibody-mediated injury in MS. A provocative report that antibodies to MOG are present in patients with CIS and correlate with an increased risk of progression to MS (Berger et al., 2003) has not been reproduced by several groups, though antibodies may be associated with a higher MRI lesion load (Kuhle et al., 2007; Lim et al., 2005; Pelayo et al., 2007). Increased frequencies of antibodies to MOG have been reported in the serum and CSF of MS patients relative to controls (Kennel De March et al., 2003), but other studies have found similar levels of anti-MOG in MS and other neurological diseases or controls (Brokstad et al., 1994; Lampasona et al., 2004; Mantegazza et al., 2004; Markovic et al., 2003; O’Connor et al., 2007; Reindl et al., 1999). Although detectable in some cases, the reported frequency of anti-MOG in serum and CSF from MS patients varies considerably between studies. This variability is primarily attributable to differences in the assay methodologies and antigens utilized. Antibodies that bind to native MOG are most relevant to the disease, but are not detectable with all assays. Many of these studies used Western blots, which only detect antibodies to denatured antigen, or ELISAs, which cannot distinguish between responses to folded and unfolded proteins (Mathey et al., 2004). Furthermore, the results obtained with Western blots and ELISAs do not necessarily correlate, even with the same sera (Pittock et al., 2007). New methods have therefore been developed that enable specific detection of antibodies to properly folded and glycosylated MOG protein. The first method involves labeling of MOG transfectants with serum or CSF antibodies (Brehm et al., 1999; Lalive et al., 2006; O’Connor et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2006), but the frequency of anti-MOG in MS still varies considerably between these studies, suggesting heterogeneity in the studied patient populations. The second method is a sensitive radioimmunoassay with a tetrameric version of folded and glycosylated MOG protein. The tetrameric nature of the antigen enables bivalent binding by IgG antibodies and thus increases the avidity of the interaction. With this assay, MOG antibodies were detected in nearly 20% of ADEM patients but only infrequently in adult-onset MS patients (O’Connor et al., 2007). These results suggest that antibodies to MOG are more prevalent in ADEM than in adult-onset MS.

Antibodies to other myelin components including MBP, PLP, MAG, and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (CNP) have each been detected in some studies of MS serum or CSF (Hafler et al., 2005). The frequency of these antibodies in MS and controls, like anti-MOG, varies considerably between studies, and none are useful as a diagnostic or prognostic marker. Furthermore, the contribution of antibodies to intracellular proteins such as MBP to the initiation of myelin damage is likely to be minimal, as they are only exposed once the demyelinating process has begun, but MBP-specific B cells may nevertheless be relevant as APC. The myelin sheath contains a variety of lipids, some of which may also be recognized by autoreactive B cells. Using arrays of 50 unique brain and microbial lipids, Kanter et al. have defined an antibody response to sulfatide in MS CSF, and addition of sulfatide to a myelin peptide immunization worsens the course of EAE in mice (Kanter et al., 2006).

Axonal degeneration appears to be an important factor in the cumulative neurological disability that develops over time in MS patients. A recent study demonstrated that an axonal protein is targeted by autoantibodies in a subset of MS patients, suggesting that the B cell response may not only contribute to demyelination but also to axonal damage. Approximately one-third of MS sera contained antibodies to neurofascin, an adhesion molecule expressed by oligodendrocytes and neurons which localizes to the myelin–axon interface at the nodes of Ranvier (Mathey et al., 2007). Antibodies to neurofascin caused rapid worsening of EAE following systemic administration due to complement-mediated damage of the axon segments exposed at the nodes. High-throughput proteomic methods are likely to identify yet other autoantibody targets in MS.

The recent discovery of an autoantibody associated with NMO demonstrates that different inflammatory demyelinating diseases can be distinguished using antibodies as biomarkers. Serum IgG reactivity against the blood–brain barrier of mouse CNS tissue was found in the majority of patients with NMO (73%) or an optic-spinal form of MS (58%), but rarely in MS or controls, with 91–100% specificity for optic-spinal conditions (Lennon et al., 2004). This “NMO-IgG” was also detectable in individuals with longitudinally extensive myelitis or recurrent optic neuritis, who are at a high risk of developing NMO. A single autoantigen, aquaporin-4 (Aqp4), was later found to be targeted by the autoantibody in NMO (Lennon et al., 2005). Aquaporins are a family of water channels responsible for maintaining fluid balance in the renal medulla and gastric mucosa, and are also expressed by astrocytes in the CNS, localizing to the foot processes at the blood–brain barrier (Fig. 4.3). Serum antibodies from NMO patients showed identical reactivity to a monoclonal anti-Aqp4, and no reactivity was observed in tissue sections from Aqp4-null mice (Lennon et al., 2005; Paul et al., 2007; Takahashi et al., 2007). The high specificity and sensitivity of anti-Aqp4 assays were confirmed in larger studies of patients with NMO and other neurological or autoimmune diseases including pediatric and adult-onset MS (Banwell et al., 2008; Paul et al., 2007; Takahashi et al., 2007).

Antibody titer in NMO patients was found to correlate with disease severity (Takahashi et al., 2007), and anti-Aqp4 status has since been incorporated into diagnostic criteria for NMO (Wingerchuk et al., 2006). Antibodies to aquaporin play an active role in the progression of NMO, as Aqp4 is expressed at high levels in the spinal cord and optic nerve (Nielsen et al., 1997) and demyelinated brain lesions are found more often in regions of high aquaporin expression (Pittock et al., 2006). Aqp4 protein is lost in both active and inactive NMO lesions (Roemer et al., 2007).When incubated with serum or purified IgG from NMO patients, cells transfected with Aqp4 rapidly internalize the antigen and can also undergo complement-mediated lysis (Hinson et al., 2007). Patients with NMO respond positively to plasmapheresis (Weinshenker et al., 1999), although the effect may be attributable to a change in the balance of cytokines rather than merely depletion of autoantibodies. Because autoantibody levels typically do not change following treatment, the benefit of Rituximab in NMO and MS is likely due to disruption of antibody-independent B cell functions, such as antigen presentation and cytokine production within the CNS.

4. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The significant clinical and pathogenic heterogeneity of MS and related diseases make it challenging to define the mechanisms of demyelination in an individual, and biomarkers that reflect pathogenetic mechanisms may thus be valuable for individualized treatment. Autoantibodies circulating in the blood and CSF are attractive candidates for the development of biomarkers, and have already proven useful in differentiating NMO and MS. Autoantibodies to multiple islet antigens are highly predictive of progression to type I diabetes (Verge et al., 1996; Ziegler et al., 1999), and measurement of autoantibodies may also become clinically useful in MS and related demyelinating diseases once more antigens are identified and characterized. The MS community has traditionally focused on well-defined candidate autoantigens such as MBP, PLP, and MOG, but recent systematic approaches for the identification of novel antigens have yielded several new protein and lipid targets. Definition of the repertoire of autoantibodies may allow classification of demyelinating diseases based on pathogenetic mechanisms rather than clinical presentation, facilitating individualized treatment or prediction of disease progression. For example, the presence of Aqp4 antibodies in NMO patients predicts a better response to plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin. Antibodies may be a key component of the primary immune response responsible for initiation of tissue damage in MS, or may be merely reflect tissue damage. In vivo studies with purified or recombinant antibodies will be necessary to distinguish between these possibilities.

Now that clinical trials with Rituximab have proven that B cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS, more selective approaches can be tested that target either defined B cell populations or functions. Because plasma cells are preserved and autoantibody titers do not decrease in all patients following B cell depletion, the beneficial effects of Rituximab in MS suggest that other B cell functions are critical, such as antigen presentation to T cells with a matching antigen specificity and/or cytokine and chemokine production. Rather than depleting B cells systemically, it may be preferable to decrease levels of prosurvival factors for which autoreactive cells must compete or block the cytokines required for perpetuation of an autoimmune response. A soluble version of the BAFF receptor has successfully been used to treat and prevent MOG-induced EAE (Huntington et al., 2006). Recovery was associated with decreased anti-MOG titer and alterations in T cell cytokine production with increased levels of TGFβ and a reduction of IFNγ. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have been targeted to specific cells in the periphery and CNS as complexes with soluble antibodies or antibody-decorated liposomes (Kumar et al., 2007; Song et al., 2005). siRNAs could thus be used to target antigen presenting molecules or cytokines in either the entire B cell pool, or cells with a defined activation/differentiation state.

B cells are now recognized to play a central role in MS and many other chronic inflammatory diseases. Although antibodies to myelin and neurons are likely to contribute to demyelination, the capacity of B cells to activate antigen-specific T cells or promote a proinflammatory cytokine environment is critical for disease progression. The complex interplay between B cells, T cells and other cells of the immune system may thus offer a number of other approaches to therapy that preserve the B cell repertoire.

REFERENCES

  1. Achenbach P, Koczwara K, Knopff A, Naserke H, Ziegler A, Bonifacio E. Mature high-affinity immune responses to (pro)insulin anticipate the autoimmune cascade that leads to type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;114(4):589–597. doi: 10.1172/JCI21307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aloisi F, Pujol-Borrell R. Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006;6(3):205–217. doi: 10.1038/nri1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banwell B, Tenembaum S, Lennon VA, Ursell E, Kennedy J, Bar-Or A, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ. Neuromyelitis optica-IgG in childhood inflammatory demyelinating CNS disorders. Neurology. 2008;70(5):344–352. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000284600.80782.d5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baranzini SE, Jeong MC, Butunoi C, Murray RS, Bernard CCA, Oksenberg JR. B cell repertoire diversity and clonal expansion in multiple sclerosis brain lesions. J. Immunol. 1999;163(9):5133–5144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Belman AL, Chitnis T, Renoux C, Waubant E the International Pediatric MS Study Group. Challenges in the classification of pediatric multiple sclerosis and future directions. Neurology. 2007;68(16) Suppl. 2:S70–S74. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000259421.40556.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger T, Rubner P, Schautzer F, Egg R, Ulmer H, Mayringer I, Dilitz E, Deisenhammer F, Reindl M. Antimyelin antibodies as a predictor of clinically definite multiple sclerosis after a first demyelinating event. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349(2):139–145. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bettelli E, Baeten D, Jäger A, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific T and B cells cooperate to induce a Devic-like disease in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116(9):2393–2402. doi: 10.1172/JCI28334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bettelli E, Korn T, Kuchroo VK. Th17: The third member of the effector T cell trilogy. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007;19(6):652–657. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bettelli E, Pagany M, Weiner HL, Linington C, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific T cell receptor transgenic mice develop spontaneous autoimmune optic neuritis. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197(9):1073–1081. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brehm U, Piddlesden SJ, Gardinier MV, Linington C. Epitope specificity of demyelinating monoclonal autoantibodies directed against the human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) J. Neuroimmunol. 1999;97(1–2):9–15. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(99)00010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Breithaupt C, Schubart A, Zander H, Skerra A, Huber R, Linington C, Jacob U. Structural insights into the antigenicity of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003;100(16):9446–9451. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1133443100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brokstad KA, Page M, Nyland H, Haaheim LR. Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein are not present in the serum and CSF of MS patients. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1994;89(6):407–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunner C, Lassmann H, Waehneldt TV, Matthieu J-M, Linington C. Differential ultrastructural localization of myelin basic protein, myelin/oligodendroglial glycoprotein, and 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase in the CNS of adult rats. J. Neurochem. 1989;52(1):296–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb10930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cambier JC, Pleiman CM, Clark MR. Signal transduction by the B cell antigen receptor and its coreceptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994;12(1):457–486. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.002325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cannella B, Raine CS. The adhesion molecule and cytokine profile of multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann. Neurol. 1995;37(4):424–435. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cepok S, Zhou D, Srivastava R, Nessler S, Stei S, Bussow K, Sommer N, Hemmer B. Identification of Epstein-Barr virus proteins as putative targets of the immune response in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2005;115(5):1352–1360. doi: 10.1172/JCI23661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan O, Shlomchik MJ. Anew role for B cells in systemic autoimmunity: B cells promote spontaneous T cell activation in MRL-lpr/lpr mice. J. Immunol. 1998;160(1):51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chan OTM, Hannum LG, Haberman AM, Madaio MP, Shlomchik MJ. A novel mouse with B cells but lacking serum antibody reveals an antibody-independent role for B cells in murine lupus. J. Exp. Med. 1999a;189(10):1639–1648. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.10.1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan OTM, Madaio MP, Shlomchik MJ. B cells are required for lupus nephritis in the polygenic, Fas-intact MRL model of systemic autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 1999b;163(7):3592–3596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chataway J, Feakes R, Coraddu F, Gray J, Deans J, Fraser M, Robertson N, Broadley S, Jones H, Clayton D, Goodfellow P, Sawcer S, et al. The genetics of multiple sclerosis: Principles, background and updated results of the United Kingdom systematic genome screen. Brain. 1998;121(10):1869–1887. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.10.1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, Dougados M, Furie RA, Genovese MC, Keystone EC, Loveless JE, Burmester G-R, Cravets MW, Hessey EW, Shaw T, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2793–2806. doi: 10.1002/art.22025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Colombo M, Dono M, Gazzola P, Roncella S, Valetto A, Chiorazzi N, Mancardi GL, Ferrarini M. Accumulation of clonally related B Lymphocytes in the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. J. Immunol. 2000;164(5):2782–2789. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.5.2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Correale J, de los Milagros Bassani Molinas MA. Oligoclonal bands and antibody responses in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2002;249(4):375–389. doi: 10.1007/s004150200026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cree BAC, Lamb S, Morgan K, Chen A, Waubant E, Genain C. An open label study of the effects of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1270–1272. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000159399.81861.D5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cross AH, Stark JL, Lauber J, Ramsbottom MJ, Lyons J-A. Rituximab reduces B cells and T cells in cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 2006;180(1–2):63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cua DJ, Groux H, Hinton DR, Stohlman SA, Coffman RL. Transgenic interleukin 10 prevents induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 1999;189(6):1005–1010. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.6.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Czlonkowska A, Ciesielska A, Gromadzka G, Kurkowska-Jastrzebska I. Estrogen and cytokines production - the possible cause of gender differences in neurological diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005;11(8):1017–1030. doi: 10.2174/1381612053381693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dale RC, de Sousa C, Chong WK, Cox TC, Harding B, Neville BG. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis in children. Brain. 2000;123(12):2407–2422. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davidson A, Aranow C. Pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2006;18(5):468–475. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000240356.45550.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dorner T, Egerer K, Feist E, Burmester GR. Rheumatoid factor revisited. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2004;16(3):246–253. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200405000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Drake L, McGovern-Brindisi EM, Drake JR. BCR ubiquitination controls BCR-mediated antigen processing and presentation. Blood. 2006;108(13):4086–4093. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-025338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Duddy ME, Alter A, Bar-Or A. Distinct profiles of human B cell effector cytokines: A role in immune regulation? J. Immunol. 2004;172(6):3422–3427. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Duddy M, Niino M, Adatia F, Hebert S, Freedman M, Atkins H, Kim HJ, Bar-Or A. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2007;178(10):6092–6099. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Edwards JCW, Cambridge G. B-cell targeting in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006;6(5):394–403. doi: 10.1038/nri1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Edwards JCW, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Emery P, Close DR, Stevens RM, Shaw T. Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350(25):2572–2581. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Elson CJ, Barker RN. Helper T cells in antibody-mediated, organ-specific autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2000;12(6):664–669. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(00)00160-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Endres R, Alimzhanov MB, Plitz T, Futterer A, Kosco-Vilbois MH, Nedospasov SA, Rajewsky K, Pfeffer K. Mature follicular dendritic cell networks depend on expression of lymphotoxin beta receptor by radioresistant stromal cells and of lymphotoxin beta and tumor necrosis factor by B cells. J. Exp. Med. 1999;189(1):159–168. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3(10):944–950. doi: 10.1038/ni833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Franciotta D, Zardini E, Bergamaschi R, Grimaldi LM, Andreoni L, Cosi V. Analysis of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis and other neurologic diseases. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2005;112(4):238–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fu Y-X, Huang G, Wang Y, Chaplin DD. B lymphocytes induce the formation of follicular dendritic cell clusters in a lymphotoxin alpha -dependent fashion. J. Exp. Med. 1998;187(7):1009–1018. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.7.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Genain CP, Cannella B, Hauser SL, Raine CS. Identification of autoantibodies associated with myelin damage in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 1999;5(2):170–175. doi: 10.1038/5532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Genain CP, Nguyen MH, Letvin NL, Pearl R, Davis RL, Adelman M, Lees MB, Linington C, Hauser SL. Antibody facilitation of multiple sclerosis-like lesions in a nonhuman primate. J. Clin. Invest. 1995;96(6):2966–2974. doi: 10.1172/JCI118368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gommerman JL, Browning JL. Lymphotoxin/LIGHT, lymphoid microenvironments and autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3(8):642–655. doi: 10.1038/nri1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gonzalez M, Mackay F, Browning JL, Kosco-Vilbois MH, Noelle RJ. The Sequential role of lymphotoxin and B cells in the development of splenic follicles. J. Exp. Med. 1998;187(7):997–1007. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.7.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goodin DS. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: Have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann. Neurol. 2006;59(4):597–605. doi: 10.1002/ana.20832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gordy C, Mishra S, Rodgers W. Visualization of antigen presentation by actin-mediated targeting of glycolipid-enriched membrane domains to the immune synapse of B cell APCs. J. Immunol. 2004;172(4):2030–2038. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hafler DA, Slavik JM, Anderson DE, O’Connor KC, De Jager P, Baecher-Allan C. Multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Rev. 2005;204(1):208–231. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Haines JL, Ter-Minassian M, Bazyk A, Gusella JF, Kim DJ, Terwedow H, PericakVance MA, Rimmler JB, Haynes CS, Roses AD, Lee A, Shaner B, et al. A complete genomic screen for multiple sclerosis underscores a role for the major histocompatability complex. Nat. Genet. 1996;13(4):469–471. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Harp C, Lee J, Lambracht-Washington D, Cameron E, Olsen G, Frohman E, Racke M, Monson N. Cerebrospinal fluid B cells from multiple sclerosis patients are subject to normal germinal center selection. J. Neuroimmunol. 2007;183(1–2):189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Harris DP, Haynes L, Sayles PC, Duso DK, Eaton SM, Lepak NM, LJohnson AL, Swain SL, Lund FE. Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2000;1(6):475–482. doi: 10.1038/82717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Harvey BP, Gee RJ, Haberman AM, Shlomchik MJ, Mamula MJ. Antigen presentation and transfer between B cells and macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37(7):1739–1751. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Haubold K, Owens GP, Kaur P, Ritchie AM, Gilden DH, Bennett JL. B-lymphocyte and plasma cell clonal expansion in monosymptomatic optic neuritis cerebrospinal fluid. Ann. Neurol. 2004;56(1):97–107. doi: 10.1002/ana.20152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. The neurobiology of multiple sclerosis: Genes, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2006;52(1):61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hauser SL, Waubant E, Arnold DL, Vollmer T, Antel J, Fox RJ, Bar-Or A, Panzara M, Sarkar N, Agarwal S, Langer-Gould A, Smith CH the HERMES Trial Group. B-Cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358(7):676–688. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hickey WF. Basic principles of immunological surveillance of the normal central nervous system. Glia. 2001;36(2):118–124. doi: 10.1002/glia.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hinson SR, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Roemer SF, Fryer JP, Kryzer TJ, Lennon VA. Pathogenic potential of IgG binding to water channel extracellular domain in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2007;69(24):2221–2231. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000289761.64862.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hjelmstrom P, Juedes AE, Fjell J, Ruddle NH. Cutting edge: B cell-deficient mice develop experimental allergic encephalomyelitis with demyelination after myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein sensitization. J. Immunol. 1998;161(9):4480–4483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Huntington ND, Tomioka R, Clavarino C, Chow AM, Linares D, Mana P, Rossjohn J, Cachero TG, Qian F, Kalled SL, Bernard CCA, Reid HH. A BAFF antagonist suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by targeting cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. Int. Immunol. 2006;18(10):1473–1485. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kanter JL, Narayana S, Ho PP, Catz I, Warren KG, Sobel RA, Steinman L, Robinson WH. Lipid microarrays identify key mediators of autoimmune brain inflammation. Nat. Med. 2006;12(1):138–143. doi: 10.1038/nm1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung H-P, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu E-W, Bauer L, Dahms S, Lanius V, et al. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007;370(9585):389–397. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Keegan M, Konig F, McClelland R, Bruck W, Morales Y, Bitsch A, Panitch H, Lassmann H, Weinshenker B, Rodriguez M, Parisi J, Lucchinetti CF. Relation between humoral pathological changes in multiple sclerosis and response to therapeutic plasma exchange. Lancet. 2005;366(9485):579–582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kennel De March A, De Bouwerie M, Kolopp-Sarda MN, Faure GC, Bene MC. Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein B-cell responses in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003;135(1–2):117–125. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00434-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kent SC, Chen Y, Bregoli L, Clemmings SM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Hering BJ, Hafler DA. Expanded T cells from pancreatic lymph nodes of type 1 diabetic subjects recognize an insulin epitope. Nature. 2005;435(7039):224–228. doi: 10.1038/nature03625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Keystone E, Fleischmann R, Emery P, Furst DE, van Vollenhoven R, Bathon J, Dougados M, Baldassare A, Ferraccioli G, Chubick A, Udell J, Cravets MW, et al. Safety and efficacy of additional courses of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: An open-label extension analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(12):3896–3908. doi: 10.1002/art.23059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Klein U, Dalla-Favera R. Germinal centres: Role in B-cell physiology and malignancy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8(1):22–33. doi: 10.1038/nri2217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kohn LD, Harii N. Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSHRAbs): Epitopes, origins and clinical significance. Autoimmunity. 2003;36(6/7):331–337. doi: 10.1080/08916930310001604199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Krishnamoorthy G, Lassmann H, Wekerle H, Holz A. Spontaneous opticospinal encephalomyelitis in a double-transgenic mouse model of autoimmune T cell/B cell cooperation. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116(9):2385–2392. doi: 10.1172/JCI28330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Krumbholz M, Theil D, Derfuss T, Rosenwald A, Schrader F, Monoranu C-M, Kalled SL, Hess DM, Serafini B, Aloisi F, Wekerle H, Hohlfeld R, et al. BAFF is produced by astrocytes and up-regulated in multiple sclerosis lesions and primary central nervous system lymphoma. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201(2):195–200. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Krupp LB, Banwell B, Tenembaum S the International Pediatric MS Study Group. Consensus definitions proposed for pediatric multiple sclerosis and related disorders. Neurology. 2007;68(16) Suppl. 2:S7–S12. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000259422.44235.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kuhle J, Lindberg R, Regeniter A, Mehling M, Hoffmann F, Reindl M, Berger T, Radue E, Leppert D, Kappos L. Antimyelin antibodies in clinically isolated syndromes correlate with inflammation in MRI and CSF. J. Neurol. 2007;254(2):160–168. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kumar P, Wu H, McBride JL, Jung K-E, Hee Kim M, Davidson BL, Kyung Lee S, Shankar P, Manjunath N. Transvascular delivery of small interfering RNA to the central nervous system. Nature. 2007;448(7149):39–43. doi: 10.1038/nature05901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kunkel EJ, Butcher EC. Plasma-cell homing. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3(10):822–829. doi: 10.1038/nri1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lalive PH, Menge T, Delarasse C, Della Gaspera B, Pham-Dinh D, Villoslada P, von Büdingen H-C, Genain CP. Antibodies to native myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein are serologic markers of early inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103(7):2280–2285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510672103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lambracht-Washington D, O’Connor KC, Cameron EM, Jowdry A, Ward ES, Frohman E, Racke MK, Monson NL. Antigen specificity of clonally expanded and receptor edited cerebrospinal fluid B cells from patients with relapsing remitting MS. J. Neuroimmunol. 2007;186(1–2):164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lampasona V, Franciotta D, Furlan R, Zanaboni S, Fazio R, Bonifacio E, Comi G, Martino G. Similar low frequency of anti-MOG IgG and IgM in MS patients and healthy subjects. Neurology. 2004;62(11):2092–2094. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000127615.15768.ae. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lankar D, Vincent-Schneider H, Briken V, Yokozeki T, Raposo G, Bonnerot C. Dynamics of major histocompatibility complex class II compartments during B cell receptor-mediated cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195(4):461–472. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lanzavecchia A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature. 1985;314(6011):537–539. doi: 10.1038/314537a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lassmann H, Bruck W, Lucchinetti C. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis: Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Trends Mol. Med. 2001;7(3):115–121. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(00)01909-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Leake J, Albani S, Kao A, Senac M, Billman G, Nespeca M, Paulino A, Quintela E, Sawyer M, Bradley J. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in childhood: Epidemiologic, clinical and laboratory features. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2004;23(8):756–764. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000133048.75452.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ledeen RW, Chakraborty G. Cytokines, signal transduction, and inflammatory demyelination: Review and hypothesis. Neurochem. Res. 1998;23(3):277–289. doi: 10.1023/a:1022493013904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202(4):473–477. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Weinshenker BG. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: Distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2106–2112. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17551-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lesley R, Xu Y, Kalled SL, Hess DM, Schwab SR, Shu H-B, Cyster JG. Reduced competitiveness of autoantigen-engaged B cells due to increased dependence on BAFF. Immunity. 2004;20(4):441–453. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00079-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lim ET, Berger T, Reindl M, Dalton CM, Fernando K, Keir G, Thompson EJ, Miller DH, Giovannoni G. Anti-myelin antibodies do not allow earlier diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2005;11(4):492–494. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1187sr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Linington C, Bradl M, Lassmann H, Brunner C, Vass K. Augmentation of demyelination in rat acute allergic encephalomyelitis by circulating mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against a myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Am. J. Pathol. 1988;130(3):443–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Linington C, Webb M, Woodhams PL. A novel myelin-associated glycoprotein defined by a mouse monoclonal antibody. J. Neuroimmunol. 1984;6(6):387–396. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(84)90064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Link H, Huang Y-M. Oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid: An update on methodology and clinical usefulness. J. Neuroimmunol. 2006;180(1–2):17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Lorenz RG, Chaplin DD, McDonald KG, McDonough JS, Newberry RD. Isolated lymphoid follicle formation is inducible and dependent upon lymphotoxin-sufficient B lymphocytes, lymphotoxin-beta receptor, and TNF receptor I function. J. Immunol. 2003;170(11):5475–5482. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.11.5475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lucchinetti C, Brück W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: Implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann. Neurol. 2000;47(6):707–717. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200006)47:6<707::aid-ana3>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Lyons J-A, Ramsbottom MJ, Cross AH. Critical role of antigen-specific antibody in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induced by recombinant myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32(7):1905–1913. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200207)32:7<1905::AID-IMMU1905>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Lyons J-A, San M, Happ MP, Cross AH. B cells are critical to induction of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by protein but not by a short encephalitogenic peptide. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999;29(11):3432–3439. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3432::AID-IMMU3432>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. MacLennan ICM. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994;12(1):117–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Magliozzi R, Columba-Cabezas S, Serafini B, Aloisi F. Intracerebral expression of CXCL13 and BAFF is accompanied by formation of lymphoid follicle-like structures in the meninges of mice with relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2004;148(1–2):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Magliozzi R, Howell O, Vora A, Serafini B, Nicholas R, Puopolo M, Reynolds R, Aloisi F. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology. Brain. 2007;130(4):1089–1104. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mantegazza R, Cristaldini P, Bernasconi P, Baggi F, Pedotti R, Piccini I, Mascoli N, Mantia LL, Antozzi C, Simoncini O, Cornelio F, Milanese C. Anti-MOG autoantibodies in Italian multiple sclerosis patients: Specificity, sensitivity and clinical association. Int. Immunol. 2004;16(4):559–565. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Markovic M, Trajkovic V, Drulovic J, Mesaros S, Stojsavljevic N, Dujmovic I, Stojkovic MM. Antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003;211(1–2):67–73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00066-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mathey E, Breithaupt C, Schubart AS, Linington C. Commentary: Sorting the wheat from the chaff: Identifying demyelinating components of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-specific autoantibody repertoire. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004;34(8):2065–2071. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mathey EK, Derfuss T, Storch MK, Williams KR, Hales K, Woolley DR, Al-Hayani A, Davies SN, Rasband MN, Olsson T, Moldenhauer A, Velhin S, et al. Neurofascin as a novel target for autoantibody-mediated axonal injury. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204(10):2363–2372. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung H-P, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2001;50(1):121–127. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. McHeyzer-Williams LJ, Malherbe LP, McHeyzer-Williams MG. Check-points in memory B-cell evolution. Immunol. Rev. 2006;211(1):255–268. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Menard LC, Minns LA, Darche S, Mielcarz DW, Foureau DM, Roos D, Dzierszinski F, Kasper LH, Buzoni-Gatel D. B cells amplify IFN-γ production by T cells via a TNF-α-mediated mechanism. J. Immunol. 2007;179(7):4857–4866. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Mikaeloff Y, Caridade G, Husson B, Suissa S, Tardieu M. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis cohort study: Prognostic factors for relapse. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2007;11(2):90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mikaeloff Y, Suissa S, Vallee L, Lubetzki C, Ponsot G, Confavreux C, Tardieu M, Group KS. First episode of acute CNS inflammatory demyelination in childhood: Prognostic factors for multiple sclerosis and disability. J. Pediatr. 2004;144(2):246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Miller J. The importance of early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2004;10(3) Suppl. b:S4–S11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Monson NL, Cravens PD, Frohman EM, Hawker K, Racke MK. Effect of rituximab on the peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid B cells in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2005;62(2):258–264. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.2.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Nielsen S, Arnulf Nagelhus E, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Bourque C, Agre P, Petter Ottersen O. Specialized membrane domains for water transport in glial cells: High-resolution immunogold cytochemistry of aquaporin-4 in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 1997;17(1):171–180. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00171.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343(13):938–952. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. O’Connor KC, Appel H, Bregoli L, Call ME, Catz I, Chan JA, Moore NH, Warren KG, Wong SJ, Hafler DA, Wucherpfennig KW. Antibodies from inflamed central nervous system tissue recognize myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. J. Immunol. 2005;175(3):1974–1982. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. O’Connor KC, McLaughlin KA, De Jager PL, Chitnis T, Bettelli E, Xu C, Robinson WH, Cherry SV, Bar-Or A, Banwell B, Fukaura H, Fukazawa T, et al. Self-antigen tetramers discriminate between myelin autoantibodies to native or denatured protein. Nat. Med. 2007;13(2):211–217. doi: 10.1038/nm1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Owens GP, Kannus H, Burgoon MP, Smith-Jensen T, Devlin ME, Gilden DH. Restricted use of VH4 Germline segments in an acute multiple sclerosis brain. Ann. Neurol. 1998;43(2):236–243. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Paul F, Jarius S, Aktas O, Bluthner M, Bauer O, Appelhans H, Franciotta D, Bergamaschi R, Littleton E, Palace J, Seelig H-P, Hohlfeld R, et al. Antibody to aquaporin 4 in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica. PLoS Med. 2007;4(4):e113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Pelayo R, Tintore M, Montalban X, Rovira A, Espejo C, Reindl M, Berger T. Antimyelin antibodies with no progression to multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356(4):426–428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc062467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pistoia V. Production of cytokines by human B cells in health and disease. Immunol. Today. 1997;18(7):343–350. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(97)01080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pittock SJ, Reindl M, Achenbach S, Berger T, Bruck W, Konig F, Morales Y, Lassmann H, Bryant S, Moore SB, Keegan BM, Lucchinetti CF. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in pathologically proven multiple sclerosis: Frequency, stability and clinicopathologic correlations. Mult. Scler. 2007;13(1):7–16. doi: 10.1177/1352458506072189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF, Wingerchuk DM, Corboy JR, Lennon VA. Neuromyelitis optica brain lesions localized at sites of high aquaporin 4 expression. Arch. Neurol. 2006;63(7):964–968. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.7.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtellotte WW. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Ann. Neurol. 1983;13(3):227–231. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Prineas JW, Graham JS. Multiple sclerosis: Capping of surface immunoglobulin G on macrophages engaged in myelin breakdown. Ann. Neurol. 1981;10(2):149–158. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358(9):929–939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rastetter W, White CA, Molina A. RITUXIMAB: Expanding role in therapy for lymphomas and autoimmune diseases. Annu. Rev. Med. 2004;55(1):477–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.104249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Reff M, Carner K, Chambers K, Chinn P, Leonard J, Raab R, Newman R, Hanna N, Anderson D. Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood. 1994;83(2):435–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Reindl M, Linington C, Brehm U, Egg R, Dilitz E, Deisenhammer F, Poewe W, Berger T. Antibodies against the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and the myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases: A comparative study. Brain. 1999;122(11):2047–2056. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.11.2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Renaud S, Fuhr P, Gregor M, Schweikert K, Lorenz D, Daniels C, Deuschl G, Gratwohl A, Steck AJ. High-dose rituximab and anti-MAG-associated polyneuropathy. Neurology. 2006;66(5):742–744. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201193.00382.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Renaud S, Gregor M, Fuhr P, Lorenz D, Deuschl G, Gratwohl A, Steck AJ. Rituximab in the treatment of polyneuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27(5):611–615. doi: 10.1002/mus.10359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rivera A, Chen C-C, Ron N, Dougherty JP, Ron Y. Role of B cells as antigen-presenting cells in vivo revisited: Antigen-specific B cells are essential for T cell expansion in lymph nodes and for systemic T cell responses to low antigen concentrations. Int. Immunol. 2001;13(12):1583–1593. doi: 10.1093/intimm/13.12.1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Roemer SF, Parisi JE, Lennon VA, Benarroch EE, Lassmann H, Bruck W, Mandler RN, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF. Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica frommultiple sclerosis. Brain. 2007;130(5):1194–1205. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Battaglia M, Bacchetta R, Fleischhauer K, Levings MK. Interleukin-10 secreting type 1 regulatory T cells in rodents and humans. Immunol. Rev. 2006;212(1):28–50. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: An update. Neurol. Sci. 2001;22(2):117–139. doi: 10.1007/s100720170011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sabahi R, Anolik JH. B-cell-targeted therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. Drugs. 2006;66(15):1933–1948. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sawcer S, Jones HB, Feakes R, Gray J, Smaldon N, Chataway J, Robertson N, Clayton D, Goodfellow PN, Compston A. A genome screen in multiple sclerosis reveals susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p21 and 17q22. Nat. Genet. 1996;13(4):464–468. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Selmaj K, Raine CS, Cannella B, Brosnan CF. Identification of lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis factor in multiple sclerosis lesions. J. Clin. Invest. 1991;87(3):949–954. doi: 10.1172/JCI115102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, Magliozzi R, Stigliano E, Aloisi F. Detection of ectopic B-cell follicles with germinal centers in the meninges of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2004;14(2):164–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00049.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Serreze D, Chapman H, Varnum D, Hanson M, Reifsnyder P, Richard S, Fleming S, Leiter E, Shultz L. B lymphocytes are essential for the initiation of T cellmediated autoimmune diabetes: Analysis of a new "speed congenic" stock of NOD.Ig mu null mice. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184(5):2049–2053. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.5.2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Shilling RA, Bandukwala HS, Sperling AI. Regulation of T:B cell interactions by the inducible costimulator molecule: Does ICOS "induce" disease? Clin. Immunol. 2006;121(1):13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2006.04.574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Singh RR. SLE: Translating lessons from model systems to human disease. Trends Immunol. 2005;26(11):572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Smith-Jensen T, Burgoon MP, Anthony J, Kraus H, Gilden DH, Owens GP. Comparison of immunoglobulin G heavy-chain sequences in MS and SSPE brains reveals an antigen-driven response. Neurology. 2000;54(6):1227–1232. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.6.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Song E, Zhu P, Lee S-K, Chowdhury D, Kussman S, Dykxhoorn DM, Feng Y, Palliser D, Weiner DB, Shankar P, Marasco WA, Lieberman J. Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23(6):709–717. doi: 10.1038/nbt1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sospedra M, Martin R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005;23(1):683–747. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Storch MK, Piddlesden S, Haltia M, Iivanainen M, Morgan P, Lassmann H. Multiple sclerosis: In situ evidence for antibody- and complement-mediated demyelination. Ann. Neurol. 1998;43(4):465–471. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Stromnes IM, Goverman JM. Active induction of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Nat. Protoc. 2006a;1(4):1810–1819. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Stromnes IM, Goverman JM. Passive induction of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Nat. Protoc. 2006b;1(4):1952–1960. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Stuve O, Cepok S, Elias B, Saleh A, Hartung H-P, Hemmer B, Kieseier BC. Clinical stabilization and effective B-lymphocyte depletion in the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of a patient with fulminant relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2005;62(10):1620–1623. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.10.1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Svensson L, Abdul-Majid K-B, Bauer J, Lassmann H, Harris RA, Holmdahl R. A comparative analysis of B cell-mediated myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis pathogenesis in B cell-deficient mice reveals an effect on demyelination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32(7):1939–1946. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200207)32:7<1939::AID-IMMU1939>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Misu T, Miyazawa I, Nakamura M, Watanabe S, Shiga Y, Kanaoka C, Fujimori J, Sato S, Itoyama Y. Antiaquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: A study on antibody titre. Brain. 2007;130(5):1235–1243. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Tanaka Y, Yamamoto K, Takeuchi T, Nishimoto N, Miyasaka N, Sumida T, Shima Y, Takada K, Matsumoto I, Saito K, Koike T. A multicenter phase I/II trial of rituximab for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Mod. Rheumatol. 2007;17(3):191–197. doi: 10.1007/s10165-007-0565-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Tenembaum S, Chamoles N, Fejerman N. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A long-term follow-up study of 84 pediatric patients. Neurology. 2002;59(8):1224–1231. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.8.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Tenembaum S, Chitnis T, Ness J, Hahn JS the International Pediatric MS Study Group. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neurology. 2007;68(16) Suppl. 2:S23–S36. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000259404.51352.7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. The International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357(9):851–862. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. The Lenercept Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. TNF neutralization in MS: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Neurology. 1999;53(3):457–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Thompson A, Polman C, Miller D, McDonald W, Brochet B, Filippi M, Montalban X, De Sa J. Primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1997;120(6):1085–1096. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.6.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Thrower BW. Clinically isolated syndromes: Predicting and delaying multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;68(24) Suppl. 4:S12–S15. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277704.56189.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Townsend SE, Goodnow CC. Abortive proliferation of rare T cells induced by direct or indirect antigen presentation by rare B cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1998;187(10):1611–1621. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.10.1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338(5):278–285. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801293380502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Vascotto F, Le Roux D, Lankar D, Faure-Andre G, Vargas P, Guermonprez P, Lennon-Dumenil A-M. Antigen presentation by B lymphocytes: How receptor signaling directs membrane trafficking. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007;19(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Verge C, Gianani R, Kawasaki E, Yu L, Pietropaolo M, Jackson R, Chase H, Eisenbarth G. Prediction of type I diabetes in first-degree relatives using a combination of insulin, GAD, and ICA512bdc/IA-2 autoantibodies. Diabetes. 1996;45(7):926–933. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.7.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Vincent A. Unravelling the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2(10):797–804. doi: 10.1038/nri916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. von Budingen H-C, Hauser SL, Fuhrmann A, Nabavi CB, Lee JI, Genain CP. Molecular characterization of antibody specificities against myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in autoimmune demyelination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002;99(12):8207–8212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122092499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. von Budingen HC, Hauser SL, Ouallet JC, Tanuma N, Menge T, Genain CP. Epitope recognition on the myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein differentially influences disease phenotype and antibody effector functions in autoimmune demyelination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004;34(8):2072–2083. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Warren KG, Catz I. Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein within multiple sclerosis central nervous system tissue. J. Neurol. Sci. 1993;115(2):169–176. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90221-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Weinshenker BG, O’Brien PC, Petterson TM, Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti CF, Dodick DW, Pineda AA, Stevens LN, Rodriguez M. A randomized trial of plasma exchange in acute central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease. Ann. Neurol. 1999;46(6):878–886. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199912)46:6<878::aid-ana10>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. West MA, Lucocq JM, Watts C. Antigen processing and class II MHC peptide-loading compartments in human B-lymphoblastoid cells. Nature. 1994;369(6476):147–151. doi: 10.1038/369147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wingerchuk DM. Postinfectious encephalomyelitis. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2003;3(3):256–264. doi: 10.1007/s11910-003-0086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):805–815. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2006;66(10):1485–1489. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000216139.44259.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Wong FS, Wen L, Tang M, Ramanathan M, Visintin I, Daugherty J, Hannum LG, Janeway CA, Jr, Shlomchik MJ. Investigation of the Role of B-Cells in Type 1 Diabetes in the NOD Mouse. Diabetes. 2004;53(10):2581–2587. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.10.2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Wucherpfennig KW, Catz I, Hausmann S, Strominger JL, Steinman L, Warren KG. Recognition of the immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide by autoantibodies and HLA-DR2-restricted T cell clones from multiple sclerosis patients. Identity of key contact residues in the B-cell and T-cell epitopes. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100(5):1114–1122. doi: 10.1172/JCI119622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang Y, Da R-R, Hilgenberg LG, Tourtellotte WW, Sobel RA, Smith MA, Olek M, Nagra R, Sudhir G, van den Noort S, Qin Y. Clonal expansion of IgA-positive plasma cells and axon-reactive antibodies inMS lesions. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005;167(1–2):120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhou D, Srivastava R, Nessler S, Grummel V, Sommer N, Bruck W, Hartung H-P, Stadelmann C, Hemmer B. Identification of a pathogenic antibody response to native myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103(50):19057–19062. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607242103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Ziegler A, Hummel M, Schenker M, Bonifacio E. Autoantibody appearance and risk for development of childhood diabetes in offspring of parents with type 1 diabetes: The 2-year analysis of the German BABYDIAB Study. Diabetes. 1999;48(3):460–468. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.3.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES