Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Jul 30;3(4):e00859-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00859-15

Draft Genome Sequence of Streptomyces sp. Strain PBH53, Isolated from an Urban Environment

Jessica T Gosse a, Patrick Hill b, Scot E Dowd c, Christopher N Boddy a,b,
PMCID: PMC4520906  PMID: 26227608

Abstract

We report the draft genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. strain PBH53, a strain isolated from an urban transit station in Ottawa, Canada. The analysis of the genome using the bioinformatics tool antiSMASH showed the presence of many unique natural product biosynthetic pathways.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Sediments from urban environments, such as streets, contain diverse microbial communities (1) enriched in actinomycetes (2) and possessing unique secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways (3).Urban sites may thus be a useful source for discovery of novel secondary metabolites. As the Streptomyces genus is a prolific producer of secondary metabolites (4), we sequenced the genome of a representative species isolated from an urban environment.

Sediment was taken from a bus shelter floor at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, in the summer of 2010. Sediment was diluted in sterile water, plated on Difco actinomycete isolation agar (5), and incubated at 50°C for 72 h. Colonies with actinomycetal appearance were isolated and purified. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced from the isolate PBH53, confirming that it belongs to the Streptomyces genus. PCR amplification using type I polyketide synthase (PKS)-specific primers confirmed that the strain encoded one or more polyketide biosynthetic pathways (6).

Genomic DNA was obtained from cultivation of PBH53 in yeast malt-extract medium (7). Genomic DNA was isolated using a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). Sequencing on an Illumina Miseq DNA sequencer was performed at MR DNA (Shallowater, TX). The library for each sample was prepared using a Nextera DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The library (12.5 pM) was sequenced using a 600-cycle v3 reagent kit (Illumina), with an average sequencing coverage of 50×. An initial annotation was made using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (8). The draft genome contains 9,153,597 nucleotides with G+C content of 71.83%. A total of 167 contigs were obtained, with 102 containing protein-encoding genes. Seventy-six RNA loci were identified. Annotation using Glimmer (9) provided 15,123 putative genes.

The sequence was examined using antiSMASH 3.0.0 (10), and 47 secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were identified. Most are predicted to be involved in polyketide or nonribosomal peptide biosynthesis, including 9 type I PKS clusters, 2 type II PKS clusters, and 2 type III PKS cluster as well as 8 nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene clusters and 10 mixed PKS-NRPS or PKSI-PKSII clusters. A number of the predicted PKS and NRPS appeared to be gene cluster fragments. The remaining clusters were predicted to encode biosynthetic pathways for 2 terpenes, 3 siderophores, a lantipeptide, 3 bacteriocins, ectoin, and 2 melanins. Four clusters were identified but had no predicted compound family. Two predicted pathways showed high homology to known biosynthetic gene clusters. A siderophore gene cluster showed 80% similarity to the desferrioxamine B gene cluster, and the putative ectoin gene cluster showed 75% similarity to a known ectoin biosynthetic cluster.

The Streptomyces sp. PBH53 genome sequence provides information on a prolific secondary metabolite producer isolated from an urban environment. The large number of unique secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters suggests that urban environments may be a promising site for new natural product discovery.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number CP011799. The version described in this paper is the first version.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by an NSERC Discovery grant to C.N.B. and by the CAPES Science without Borders program to J.T.G.

Footnotes

Citation Gosse JT, Hill P, Dowd SE, Boddy CN. 2015. Draft genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. strain PBH53, isolated from an urban environment. Genome Announc 3(4):e00859-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00859-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Johnson MJ, Lee KY, Scow KM. 2003. DNA fingerprinting reveals links among agricultural crops, soil properties, and the composition of soil microbial communities. Geoderma 114:279–303. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00045-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hill P, Krištůfek V, Dijkhuizen L, Boddy C, Kroetsch D, van Elsas JD. 2011. Land use intensity controls actinobacterial community structure. Microb Ecol 61:286–302. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9752-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hill P, Piel J, Aris-Brosou S, Krištůfek V, Boddy CN, Dijkhuizen L. 2014. Habitat-specific type I polyketide synthases in soils and street sediments. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:75–85. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1362-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Watve MG, Tickoo R, Jog MM, Bhole BD. 2001. How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces? Arch Microbiol 176:386–390. doi: 10.1007/s002030100345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zimbro MJ, Power DA, Miller SM, Wilson GE, Johnson JA. 2009. Difco & BBL manual: manual of microbiological culture media. BD Diagnostics–Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ayuso-Sacido A, Genilloud O. 2005. New PCR primers for the screening of NRPS and PKS-I systems in actinomycetes: detection and distribution of these biosynthetic gene sequences in major taxonomic groups. Microb Ecol 49:10–24. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0249-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zimbro MJ, Power DA, Miller SM, Wilson GE, Johnson JA. 2009. ISP medium 1 · ISP medium 2 · ISP medium 4, p 2–3. In Difco & BBL manual: manual of microbiological culture media. BD Diagnostics–Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD: http://www.bd.com/europe/regulatory/assets/ifu/difco_bbl/277210.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:206–214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with Glimmer. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weber T, Bin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R, Lee SY, Fischbach MA, Müller R, Wohlleben W, Breitling R, Takano E, Medema MH. 2015. antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 43:1–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES