Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different injuries caused by penetrating chest traumas, and also the cause and type of trauma and its accompanying injuries. This is a cross-sectional descriptive study, carried out on all patients referred to the emergency room of Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman, from March 2000 to September 2008, due to penetrating chest trauma. The required information including age, sex, cause of trauma, type and site of injury, and accompanying injury was obtained and used to fill out a questionnaire and then was analyzed. 828 patients were included in the study; most of them were in the age range of 20–29. Of the patients, 97.6 % were males. The most frequent cause of trauma was stabbing, and the most frequent injuries following the trauma were pneumothorax and hemothorax. Orthopedic trauma was the most frequent accompanying injury. The most commonly used diagnostic method was plain chest radiography. In 93 % of the patients, the chest tube was placed and thoracotomy was performed for 97 % of the patients. Shahid Bahonar Hospital is a referral Trauma Centre and treats large number of chest trauma patients. Most patients need only chest tube placement as a definitive treatment.
Keywords: Chest trauma, Chest tube, Penetrating trauma, Trauma
Introduction
Trauma is considered the first cause of mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization in the age range of 1–40 in today’s world. Perhaps, it can be mentioned that trauma has the greatest social and economical effect on all causes of disease. Thus, in current years a major part of the studies on diseases is performed on victims of traumas. According to the findings of the previous studies, chest trauma solely causes 45 % of deaths following trauma, 50 % of which happens after fatal accidents [1], and 75 % of the deaths occur after reaching emergency rooms. In 20 % of traumatized patients, chest trauma is observed isolated or accompanied with other injuries and approximately 25 % of all deaths caused by trauma occur due to chest injuries [1, 2]. In spite of these findings, emergency surgery is required in only 10–15 % of patients with chest trauma. Today, improvement of emergency services and faster transportation of patients to hospitals have increased the number of survivors. Moreover, the emergency physician should rapidly manage the patients with understanding of the trend of chest trauma pathophysiology [3]. Thus, appropriate and timely diagnosis of chest traumas is of great importance and correct diagnosis of the chest injury can decrease the mortality and morbidity [3, 4]. In the USA, each year due to various injuries 160,000 deaths occur [1]. Also, 50,000 people are affected with some degrees of permanent disabilities [1]. Hemothorax, pneumothorax, and a combination of these two injuries are the most common fatal complications of penetrating and blunt chest traumas. Since chest trauma can affect a large portion of the world population, it can lead to the highest amount of working year loss and almost 40 % of all deaths caused by it can be prevented by preventive procedures and establishment of regional trauma systems [5, 6]. The key point in diagnosis of chest trauma is having a high suspicion of the probability of chest trauma presence in an injured patient. A high portion of the injuries can be diagnosed by simple paraclinical evaluations, such as plain chest radiography [7]. In general, the appropriate understanding of problems caused by chest trauma can lead to prevention of complications caused by delay in the treatment. Also, this will decrease the mortality and bed occupancy rates, and consumption of medicines. Besides, this can prevents undue surgeries. Some measures have been carried out in Iran to reduce the mortality of accidents. Considering these and also the worldwide statistics of injuries, as well as the possible differences in the epidemiology and prevalence of chest trauma in different regions, we carried out the current study. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different injuries caused by penetrating chest traumas, and also the cause and type of trauma and accompanying injuries in patients referred to Bahonor Hospital, Kerman, between March 2000 and September 2008. We hope that identifying chest injuries as one of the major traumas in traumatized patients in the region leads to better understanding of the injuries in the region by our colleagues, and thus improves the results of diagnoses and treatments.
Materials and methods
The study was carried out retrospectively. All patients with chest trauma with or without accompanying injury who referred to the Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman, between March 2000 and September 2008 were entered the study. To this end, 828 files were reviewed (chest trauma in the current study is defined as all chest injuries resulted from penetrating trauma).
The required information including age, sex, cause of trauma, type and site of injury, and accompanying injuries were extracted and used to fill in the questionnaire. The study protocol was approved by research ethics committee of the Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
The data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 15, and chi-square was used for comparison of complications between the two groups.
Results
From March 2000 to September 2008, there were 828 cases of chest trauma. Out of which 811 patients were males (97.6 %). With respect to the age range, the patients were in the age range of 9–84 years. The highest and lowest number of patients were observed in the age ranges of 20–29 (442 patients, 53.3 %) and 50–59 (11 patients, 13.2 %), respectively. The mean age of patients was 24 years. With respect to the underlying cause of the trauma, stabbing (776 patients, 93.7 %) and cow butting (3 patients, 0.36 %) were the most and the least prevalent causes (Table 1). Regarding the site of trauma, in 481 patients (58 %) the site of trauma was the left side and in 328 patients (39 %) the site of trauma was the right side of the chest, while 19 patients (2.2 %) experienced the trauma bilaterally.
Table 1.
Cause of trauma | No. of patients | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Stabbing | 776 | 93.7 |
Bullet | 49 | 5.94 |
Cow butting | 3 | 0.36 |
Considering injuries accompanying chest trauma, in 650 patients (78.6 %) isolated chest trauma was observed. Head and neck, orthopedic, and abdominal injuries were the accompanying injuries in 22 (26 %), 116 (14 %), and 40 (4.8 %) patients, respectively (Table 2). Thus, orthopedic injuries were the most frequent accompanying injuries (Table 3). Of 116 orthopedic Injuries, 18 were fractures (bone injuries) (11; 61.11 % lower extremity and 7; 38.8 % upper extremity), which were treated, and others were soft tissue injuries. Locations of orthopedic traumas have been shown in Table 4.
Table 2.
Final diagnosis | No. of patients | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Unilateral pneumothorax | 305 | 36.8 |
Bilateral pneumothorax | 3 | 0.36 |
Unilateral hemothorax | 289 | 34.9 |
Bilateral hemothorax | 1 | 0.12 |
Unilateral pneumohemothorax | 215 | 25.9 |
Bilateral pneumohemothorax | 4 | 0.48 |
Unilateral pleural effusion | 1 | 0.12 |
Bilateral pleural effusion | 1 | 0.12 |
Tamponade | 16 | 1.93 |
Pericardial effusion | 2 | 0.24 |
Cardiac injury | 12 | 1.44 |
Table 3.
Accompanying injury | No. of patients | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Head and neck injuries | 22 | 26 |
Extremities injuries | 116 | 14 |
Abdominal injuries | 40 | 4.8 |
Isolated chest trauma | 650 | 78.6 |
Table 4.
Orthopedic trauma | Frequency n (%) |
---|---|
Upper extremity | 42 (36.20 %) |
Lower extremity | 24 (20.68 %) |
Both upper and lower extremities | 48 (41.37 %) |
Duration of hospital stay was in the range of 1–13 days. The final diagnosis, clinical course, and surgical operations (if needed) were based upon the radiological findings. The most commonly used diagnostic method was plain chest radiography (which was performed in all patients), followed by plain radiography of extremities, which was carried out in 14 % of patients (116 patients). The least frequency of use was of pulmonary CT scan, carried out only in 6 % of patients (Table 5). The different types of injuries caused by the trauma in order of the frequency were: pneumothorax 308 patients (37 %), hemothorax 290 patients (35 %), hemopneumothorax 219 patients (26 %), tamponade 16 patients (1.9 %), cardiac rupture 12 patients (1.4 %), pleural effusion two patients (1.5 %), and pericardial effusion two patients (1.5 %), which are presented in Table 2.
Table 5.
Diagnostic method | Frequency, n (%) |
---|---|
CXR | 821 (100 %) |
Limb X-ray | 116 (20.04 %) |
Skull X-ray | 478 (58.25 %) |
Abdominal and pelvic X-ray | 254 (31 %) |
Abdominal sonography | 156 (19 %) |
Chest CT scan | 49 (6 %) |
Of 828 patients studied, 821 were treated and survived; of them in 813 (93 %) patients chest tubes were placed (in 12 patients bilateral chest tubes were replaced) and eight patients (0.97 %) underwent thoracotomy. Out of the 828 evaluated patients, seven patients died (mortality rate about 0.84 %); two patients due to thoracic aorta rupture and five patients due to cardiac rupture or hemopericardium.
Bleeding developed in 90 (11 %) patients due to coagulation disorders, non-cooperation, and in two cases bleeding of intercostal vessels occurred due to incorrect placement of the chest tube. The frequency of other complications of treatment has been shown in Table 6. The frequency of other complications developed during hospital stay in the two treatment groups has been shown in Table 6.
Table 6.
Type of complication | Frequency in chest tube method, n (%) | Frequency in thoracotomy method, n (%) |
---|---|---|
Bleeding | 90 (11 %) | 2 (25 %) |
Bronchial fistula | 21 (2.55 %) | 0 |
Emphysema | 35 (4.26 %) | 0 |
Death | 9 (3.1 %) | 0 |
Discussion
Chest trauma was observed to be more frequent in men in the study (97.6 % in males versus 2.4 % in females), which is consistent with the findings of other studies. In different studies, the rate was reported to be 79–98; 7 % in male and 1.25–24.6 % in female patients [8–10]. The age ranges of 20–29 and 50–59 showed to have the highest and lowest frequencies of chest trauma, respectively, with the average age of 24 years for the patients. In similar studies, the average age of patients was 34 years [9–13]. These indicate that trauma in general is more prevalent in young people, who have the highest productivity in the society.
In the current study, the most common cause of trauma for all ages (particularly for the age range of 20–30) was stabbing similar to the Onat et al. study in Turkey [14]. This shows that young men who are more active in social affairs are more susceptible to such social injuries. It seems that further studies are required for prevention of potential complications of such injuries in young people as well as for different evaluations of social and economical aspects. The most common site for chest trauma was left side of the chest. The most frequent accompanying injury was orthopedic. In other studies, rib fracture was the most frequent accompanying injury [9, 12, 13].
The mortality rate in our study was 0.84 %, which is less than the Onat et al. study (i.e. 10.8 %) [14]. The overall mortality rate in the Clarke et al. study in South Africa was reported as 33 % for penetrating chest trauma for stab wounds and 52 % for gunshot wounds, which is significantly more than our study [15]. This difference may be due to the difference in the mechanism of injury; in their study gunshot injury was prevalent and in our study there was no gunshot injury and gunshot wounds of the chest are more lethal than stab wounds [14, 15].
It is obvious that in each traumatized patient, particularly patients with chest trauma, the general and all system examination should be carefully carried out. In the current study, the final diagnosis, which was obtained on the basis of radiological finding or surgical operation, were pneumothorax, hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, tamponade, emphysema, cardiac rupture, pericardial effusion, and pleural effusion in the order of frequency. Thus, pneumothorax was the most frequent diagnosis, which is consistent with that of some other studies [16]. This shows that among the different types of chest traumas, the most common injuries were chest wall injuries, which were mostly superficial. In the present study, with respect to the type of treatment, the chest tube was placed for most patients (93 %), and thoracotomy and opening of chest were required in eight patients (0.97 %).
In other studies, less than 10 % of patients required thoracotomy surgery, and supportive treatments and placement of chest tubes were adequate for treatment of 90–95 % of patients [8, 9, 11, 13].
In the current study, the main indications for surgical operation were severe hemorrhage and continued bleeding after placement of the chest tube. This is in agreement with those of all the previous studies. The most frequently observed finding after thoracotomy was pulmonary rupture, followed by injury of intercostal vessels, which is consistent with the findings of some other studies [4, 6, 10].
Considering this, providing more care for these patients in emergency rooms of therapeutic centers and performing immediate and life-saving procedures are necessary in all these patients. The most commonly used diagnostic method was plain chest radiography, which was carried out for all patients. Chest radiography has been indicated also in other studies as an affordable tool for diagnosis of chest injuries [2, 5, 7, 17]. A recent study has recommended that patients with penetrating chest trauma and normal screening CXR should be controlled with a 3-hour delayed CXR, serial physical examinations, and focused assessment with sonography, and CT scan should be applied as a diagnostic modality only in selected cases [18].
Conclusion
As our hospital is a trauma referral center, it can be concluded that men in the age range of 20–29 are the main susceptible group for this type of injury and stabbing is the most common cause of penetrating chest injury. Due to the high frequency of chest traumas in injured patients, placement of the chest tube is the definite treatment in most patients. Regarding the type of resulted complications, this method can be considered the most appropriate treatment in chest traumas.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Farzan Institute for Research and Technology for technical assistance.
Financial support
None
Contributor Information
M. Aghaei Afshar, Phone: +98-21-66439463, FAX: +98-21-66919206, Email: swt_f@yahoo.com
F. Mangeli, Email: drferi2020@yahoo.com
References
- 1.LoCicero J, III, Mattox KL. Epidemiology of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am. 1989;69:15–19. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44730-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schwartz SI, Shier GT, Spencer FC. Principles of Surgery, 6th ed., 2003. Vol. l, pp. 672–684.
- 3.Adegboye VO, Ladipo JK, Brimmo IA, et al. Blunt chest trauma. Afr J Med Sci. 2002;31:315–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ceran S, Sunam GS, Aribas OK, Gormus N, Solak H. Chest trauma in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:56–59. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liman ST, Kuzucu A, Tastepe AI, Ulasan GN, Topcu S. Chest injury due to blunt trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:374–378. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00813-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ. Blunt chest trauma. Curr Probl Surg. 2004;41:211–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2003.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wicky S, Wintermark M, Schnyder P, Capasso P, Denys A. Imaging of blunt chest trauma. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1524–1538. doi: 10.1007/s003300000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kulshrestha P, Munshi I, Wait R. Profile of chest trauma in a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2004;56:576–581. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000091107.00699.C7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rasmussen OV, Brynitz S, Struve-Christensen E. Thoracic injuries. A review of 93 cases. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;20:71–74. doi: 10.3109/14017438609105917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shorr RM, Crittenden M, Indeck M, Hartunian SI, Rodriguez A. Blunt thoracic trauma. Analysis of 515 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;206:200–205. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198708000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cakan A, Yuncu G, Olgaç G, et al. Thoracic trauma: analysis of 987 cases. Ulus Travma Derg. 2004;7:236–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Demirhan R, Kucuk HF, Kargi AB, Altintas M, Kurt N, Gulmen M. Evaluation of 572 cases of blunt and penetrating thoracic trauma. Ulus Travma Derg. 2003;7:231–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yalcinkaya I, Sayir F, Kurnaz M, Cobanoglu U. Chest trauma: analysis of 126 cases. Ulus Travma Derg. 2005;6:288–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Onat S, Ulku R, Avci A, Ates G, Ozcelik C. Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: analysis of 158 patients of a single center. Injury. 2011;42:900–904. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clarke DL, Quazi MA, Reddy K, Thomson SR. Emergency operation for penetrating thoracic trauma in a metropolitan surgical service in South Africa. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:563–568. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stewart RM, Myers JG, Dent DL, et al. Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: The argument for injury prevention. J Trauma. 2003;54:66–70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mefire AC, Pagbe JJ, Fokou M, Nguimbous JF, Guifo ML, Bahebeck J. Analysis of epidemiology, lesions, treatment and outcome of 354 consecutive cases of blunt and penetrating trauma to the chest in an African setting. Afr J Surg. 2010;48:90–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mollberg NM, Wise SR, De Hoyos AL, Lin FJ, Merlotti G. Chest computed tomography for penetrating thoracic trauma after normal screening chest roentgenogram. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1830–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]