Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1996 Sep 16;15(18):4981–4991.

HMG1 interacts with HOX proteins and enhances their DNA binding and transcriptional activation.

V Zappavigna 1, L Falciola 1, M Helmer-Citterich 1, F Mavilio 1, M E Bianchi 1
PMCID: PMC452236  PMID: 8890171

Abstract

High mobility group protein 1 (HMG1) is a non-histone, chromatin-associated nuclear protein with a proposed role in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. We show that HMG1 interacts with proteins encoded by the HOX gene family by establishing protein-protein contacts between the HMG box domains and the HOX homeodomain. The functional role of these interactions was studied using the transcriptional activity of the human HOXD9 protein as a model. HMG1 enhances, in a dose-dependent fashion, the sequence-specific DNA binding activity in vitro, and the transcriptional activation in a co-transfection assay in vivo, of the HOXD9 protein. Functional interaction between HMG1 and HOXD9 is dependent on the DNA binding activity of the homeodomain, and requires the HOXD9 transcriptional activation domain. HMG1 enhances activation by HOXD9, but not by HOXD8, of the HOXD9-controlled element. Specific target recognition and functional interaction with HMG1 can be transferred to HOXD8 by homeodomain swapping. We propose that HMG1-like proteins might be general co-factors in HOX-mediated transcriptional activation, which facilitate access of HOX proteins to specific DNA targets, and/or introduce architectural constraints in the assembly of HOX-containing transcriptional complexes.

Full text

PDF
4981

Images in this article

4982Image
on p.4982
4983Image
on p.4983
4983Image
on p.4983
4984Image
on p.4984
4985Image
on p.4985
4986Image
on p.4986
4986Image
on p.4986
4987Image
on p.4987
4988Image
on p.4988

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baxevanis A. D., Landsman D. The HMG-1 box protein family: classification and functional relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 May 11;23(9):1604–1613. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.9.1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bianchi M. E., Beltrame M., Paonessa G. Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1. Science. 1989 Feb 24;243(4894 Pt 1):1056–1059. doi: 10.1126/science.2922595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bianchi M. E., Falciola L., Ferrari S., Lilley D. M. The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):1055–1063. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05144.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bustin M., Lehn D. A., Landsman D. Structural features of the HMG chromosomal proteins and their genes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Jul 30;1049(3):231–243. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(90)90092-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan S. K., Jaffe L., Capovilla M., Botas J., Mann R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Nocera P. P., Dawid I. B. Transient expression of genes introduced into cultured cells of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Dec;80(23):7095–7098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.23.7095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Du W., Thanos D., Maniatis T. Mechanisms of transcriptional synergism between distinct virus-inducible enhancer elements. Cell. 1993 Sep 10;74(5):887–898. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90468-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duboule D., Morata G. Colinearity and functional hierarchy among genes of the homeotic complexes. Trends Genet. 1994 Oct;10(10):358–364. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferrari S., Ronfani L., Calogero S., Bianchi M. E. The mouse gene coding for high mobility group 1 protein (HMG1). J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 18;269(46):28803–28808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge H., Roeder R. G. The high mobility group protein HMG1 can reversibly inhibit class II gene transcription by interaction with the TATA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 24;269(25):17136–17140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodfellow P. N., Lovell-Badge R. SRY and sex determination in mammals. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:71–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.000443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grosschedl R., Giese K., Pagel J. HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. Trends Genet. 1994 Mar;10(3):94–100. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90232-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grueneberg D. A., Simon K. J., Brennan K., Gilman M. Sequence-specific targeting of nuclear signal transduction pathways by homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3318–3326. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayashi S., Scott M. P. What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins? Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):883–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90492-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jantzen H. M., Admon A., Bell S. P., Tjian R. Nucleolar transcription factor hUBF contains a DNA-binding motif with homology to HMG proteins. Nature. 1990 Apr 26;344(6269):830–836. doi: 10.1038/344830a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):191–201. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li T., Stark M. R., Johnson A. D., Wolberger C. Crystal structure of the MATa1/MAT alpha 2 homeodomain heterodimer bound to DNA. Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):262–269. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Manak J. R., Scott M. P. Gene regulation: able assistants for homeodomain proteins. Curr Biol. 1993 May 1;3(5):318–320. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90191-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mavilio F., Simeone A., Giampaolo A., Faiella A., Zappavigna V., Acampora D., Poiana G., Russo G., Peschle C., Boncinelli E. Differential and stage-related expression in embryonic tissues of a new human homoeobox gene. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):664–668. doi: 10.1038/324664a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ner S. S., Travers A. A., Churchill M. E. Harnessing the writhe: a role for DNA chaperones in nucleoprotein-complex formation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 May;19(5):185–187. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Otting G., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Müller M., Affolter M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. Protein--DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain--DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3085–3092. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07505.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oñate S. A., Prendergast P., Wagner J. P., Nissen M., Reeves R., Pettijohn D. E., Edwards D. P. The DNA-bending protein HMG-1 enhances progesterone receptor binding to its target DNA sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 May;14(5):3376–3391. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.5.3376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paull T. T., Haykinson M. J., Johnson R. C. The nonspecific DNA-binding and -bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 promote the assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures. Genes Dev. 1993 Aug;7(8):1521–1534. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.8.1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peifer M., Wieschaus E. Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. Genes Dev. 1990 Jul;4(7):1209–1223. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pil P. M., Chow C. S., Lippard S. J. High-mobility-group 1 protein mediates DNA bending as determined by ring closures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9465–9469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pil P. M., Lippard S. J. Specific binding of chromosomal protein HMG1 to DNA damaged by the anticancer drug cisplatin. Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):234–237. doi: 10.1126/science.1566071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pontiggia A., Rimini R., Harley V. R., Goodfellow P. N., Lovell-Badge R., Bianchi M. E. Sex-reversing mutations affect the architecture of SRY-DNA complexes. EMBO J. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):6115–6124. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06958.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rauskolb C., Peifer M., Wieschaus E. extradenticle, a regulator of homeotic gene activity, is a homolog of the homeobox-containing human proto-oncogene pbx1. Cell. 1993 Sep 24;74(6):1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shykind B. M., Kim J., Sharp P. A. Activation of the TFIID-TFIIA complex with HMG-2. Genes Dev. 1995 Jun 1;9(11):1354–1365. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.11.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Singh J., Dixon G. H. High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 function as general class II transcription factors. Biochemistry. 1990 Jul 3;29(26):6295–6302. doi: 10.1021/bi00478a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stelzer G., Goppelt A., Lottspeich F., Meisterernst M. Repression of basal transcription by HMG2 is counteracted by TFIIH-associated factors in an ATP-dependent process. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4712–4721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stern S., Tanaka M., Herr W. The Oct-1 homoeodomain directs formation of a multiprotein-DNA complex with the HSV transactivator VP16. Nature. 1989 Oct 19;341(6243):624–630. doi: 10.1038/341624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thanos D., Maniatis T. The high mobility group protein HMG I(Y) is required for NF-kappa B-dependent virus induction of the human IFN-beta gene. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):777–789. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90554-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Treacy M. N., Neilson L. I., Turner E. E., He X., Rosenfeld M. G. Twin of I-POU: a two amino acid difference in the I-POU homeodomain distinguishes an activator from an inhibitor of transcription. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):491–505. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90186-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tremethick D. J., Molloy P. L. Effects of high mobility group proteins 1 and 2 on initiation and elongation of specific transcription by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Dec 9;16(23):11107–11123. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.23.11107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tremethick D. J., Molloy P. L. High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 stimulate transcription in vitro by RNA polymerases II and III. J Biol Chem. 1986 May 25;261(15):6986–6992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Verbeek S., Izon D., Hofhuis F., Robanus-Maandag E., te Riele H., van de Wetering M., Oosterwegel M., Wilson A., MacDonald H. R., Clevers H. An HMG-box-containing T-cell factor required for thymocyte differentiation. Nature. 1995 Mar 2;374(6517):70–74. doi: 10.1038/374070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Watt F., Molloy P. L. High mobility group proteins 1 and 2 stimulate binding of a specific transcription factor to the adenovirus major late promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 25;16(4):1471–1486. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.4.1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Werner M. H., Huth J. R., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex. Cell. 1995 Jun 2;81(5):705–714. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90532-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zappavigna V., Renucci A., Izpisúa-Belmonte J. C., Urier G., Peschle C., Duboule D. HOX4 genes encode transcription factors with potential auto- and cross-regulatory capacities. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4177–4187. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04996.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zappavigna V., Sartori D., Mavilio F. Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeo domain. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):732–744. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zwilling S., König H., Wirth T. High mobility group protein 2 functionally interacts with the POU domains of octamer transcription factors. EMBO J. 1995 Mar 15;14(6):1198–1208. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07103.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. de Thé H., Vivanco-Ruiz M. M., Tiollais P., Stunnenberg H., Dejean A. Identification of a retinoic acid responsive element in the retinoic acid receptor beta gene. Nature. 1990 Jan 11;343(6254):177–180. doi: 10.1038/343177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. van Dijk M. A., Murre C. extradenticle raises the DNA binding specificity of homeotic selector gene products. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90526-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES