Skip to main content
Journal of Advanced Research logoLink to Journal of Advanced Research
. 2014 Oct 20;6(3):255–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.10.002

Why the radiation-attenuated cercarial immunization studies failed to guide the road for an effective schistosomiasis vaccine: A review

Rashika El Ridi 1,, Hatem Tallima 1
PMCID: PMC4522536  PMID: 26257924

Graphical abstract

Schistosomula- and adult worms-derived antigens induce predominant Th1 immune responses. The radiation-attenuated cercariae vaccine efficacy is dependent on induction of Th1 and Th2 immune responses. Accordingly, schistosomula- and adult worms-derived antigens used for effective vaccination must be combined with Th2 immune responses-inducing cytokines or molecules as adjuvant.

graphic file with name fx2.jpg

Keywords: Schistosoma, Vaccination, Radiation-attenuated cercariae, Th1 and Th2 responses, Excretory–secretory products, Cysteine peptidases

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is a debilitating parasitic disease caused by platyhelminthes of the genus Schistosoma, notably Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma haematobium, and Schistosoma japonicum. Pioneer researchers used radiation-attenuated (RA) schistosome larvae to immunize laboratory rodent and non-human primate hosts. Significant and reproducible reduction in challenge worm burden varying from 30% to 90% was achieved, providing a sound proof that vaccination against this infection is feasible. Extensive histopathological, tissue mincing and incubation, autoradiographic tracking, parasitological, and immunological studies led to defining conditions and settings for achieving optimal protection and delineating the resistance underlying mechanisms. The present review aims to summarize these findings and draw the lessons that should have guided the development of an effective schistosomiasis vaccine.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a severe parasitic disease caused by members of the genus Schistosoma, notably Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma haematobium, and Schistosoma japonicum. More than 200 million persons are infected and up to 800 million, mostly children, are at risk. These statistics may well be underestimated because the stool analysis gold standard technique for diagnosis of the infection is insensitive and unreliable leading the World Health Organization to no longer provide estimates on population infected or at risk. These have been replaced by estimates of population requiring preventive chemotherapy. Egypt is among 51 countries with population requiring chemotherapy despite inaccurate and incomplete information advocating the near eradication of schistosomiasis from Egypt [1]. These hearsays have their foundation on the unreliability of diagnostic techniques and lack of sound and objective epidemiological studies. Failure to assess the prevalence of schistosomiasis leads to people unawareness of its danger. The sequelae are intense reflected in more than 70 million disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) and remarkably high rates of years-lived-with disability (YLD) [2]. Praziquantel is the only drug commonly used for treatment. But its efficacy is not proof, and it does not prevent reinfection necessitating its repeated use, thus increasing the threat of development of parasite resistance to the drug [1,2]. Infection and transmission can be prevented if a vaccine is in place. Vaccination studies with radiation-attenuated (RA) schistosome larvae have demonstrated that a schistosomiasis vaccine is a realistic goal [3]. These studies have provided invaluable learning and directions that should have helped developing an effective vaccine composed of purified or recombinant antigens [3]. The present review attempts to outline these lessons and clarify how and where they were disregarded or painstakingly followed.

The radiation-attenuated vaccine model

The life cycle stage used

The infective schistosome stage, the cercariae are commonly used for inducing resistance to challenge infection following radiation attenuation (RA) [4]. Mechanically transformed schistosomula (tailless cercariae) attenuated by X- or gamma irradiation and injected intramuscularly (im) successfully protected mice and cynomolgus monkeys against challenge S. mansoni infection [5,6]. However, percutaneously applied RA cercariae were more effective in stimulating resistance (60%) than irradiated, im-administered, schistosomula (40%) [7]. Approximately 500 RA (50 krad of gamma irradiation) 6-day-old lung S. mansoni schistosomula, injected im, intraperitoneally (ip), or intravenously (iv) into NIH/Nmri CV and C57BL/6J mice, were also capable of inducing significant (< 0.001) levels of challenge worm reduction (36–56%) that were not very different from approximately 850 RA cercariae as immunizing agents. These findings were construed to indicate that the extravascular stages of development within the skin are not required for the induction of resistance [8]. Conversely, iv-injected RA lung-stage schistosomula derived from optimally RA cercariae failed to confer protection in C57BL/6 mice, suggesting that successful vaccination is not dependent on systemic (vascular), antigen presentation [9,10]. Additionally, irradiated day 21 (# 105) and day 28 (# 58) worms induced much less resistance (reduction in challenge worm burden of 15–27%) than RA cercariae [8].

The type and dose of radiation

Parameters of immunization of mice with 60Cobalt-irradiated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae were first described by Minard et al. [4] and related to protection against subsequent challenge infection. Optimal protection was found to be dependent on dose of irradiation, number of immunizing cercariae, and number and time course of immunizations. Low levels of resistance were obtained with low irradiation doses. In general, resistance increased with increasing irradiation doses, up to approximately 48–56 krad. Maximal resistance (70–80% reduction in challenge worm burden) was elicited by a single exposure to 250–500 cercariae, irradiated at a dose rate of 2 krad/min to a total dose of 56 krad. In C57BL/6 mice, S. mansoni cercaria RA with 60Co 15 krad induced higher levels of protection than 50 krad, and protection was maximal following 4× immunizations with moderately or highly RA cercariae [11]. Cobalt-60 RA cercariae and schistosomula vaccine was widely used in mice [3,4,7,12] and baboons [3,13] for protection against S. mansoni, in calves for protection against Schistosoma bovis [14], and in cattle and buffaloes for protection against homologous Schistosoma japonicum infection [15]. In parallel comparison studies, Cesium-137-attenuated cercariae afforded better protection than the 60Co RA vaccine. The optimal total radiation with 137Ce was between 45 and 50 krad [16]. Cercariae of S. mansoni attenuated by exposure to 30–60 krad gamma radiation from a 137Ce source induced >50% protection in baboons against homologous, but not S. haematobium, infection challenge [17], and in the vervet monkey, where a protection ceiling of 48% was achieved following 3 vaccinations [18].

X-irradiated S. mansoni cercariae were also effective in protecting mice against homologous challenge infection, provided using the optimum number of immunizing cercariae (500), dose of X-irradiation (48 krad), the number of immunizations (5), the time interval between immunization and challenge (up to 1 year), and the size of the challenging dose (up to 500 cercariae) [19,20]. X-irradiated S. japonicum tailless cercariae were employed for protecting rhesus monkeys [21] and cattle [22] against schistosomiasis japonicum, with reduction in challenge worm burden varying between 42% and 96%.

The expenses and inconvenience of gamma and X-ray irradiation promoted studies using ultraviolet (UV) irradiated vaccine, which is cost-effective, and only requires simple devices [23]. Dean et al. demonstrated that single immunization of mice with UV-attenuated S. mansoni cercariae, using a small, portable S-68 Mineralight Lamp adjusted to deliver 330–440 μwatts/cm2, conferred similar levels of resistance to infection (50–70%) as with 50 krad gamma-RA cercariae [24]. Ultra-violet-irradiated S. mansoni cercariae were capable of leading to reduction in challenge infection in guinea pigs (approximately 40%), but not Mongolian gerbils [25]. Of note, Mongolian gerbils were also not protected against S. mansoni challenge infection when vaccinated with 20 krad gamma-irradiated cercariae [26]. Likewise, UV-attenuated cercarial vaccine was highly effective with S. japonicum in protecting mice, water buffaloes, and pigs against homologous schistosome infection [27–31], but induced low, unstable level of protection in some inbred mice, notably C57BL/6 [32].

Fate of irradiated larvae

Studies using tissue mincing and incubation, histopathology, and autoradiographic tracking techniques revealed that similarly to normal larvae, RA cercariae are able to penetrate the epidermis of the host and henceforth to the dermis en route to the dermal blood or lymph capillaries, with only a slight difference in timing of skin exit, whereby attenuated larvae persist in the skin much longer than normal parasites [33–35]. A significant number of immunizing RA larvae were located in lymph nodes draining the skin site of exposure [34]. Migrating schistosomula derived from RA S. mansoni cercariae (approximately 50% of penetrants) attain the lung in 6 or 7 days, and differently from their intact counterparts linger, not to leave this site, and die therein. Indeed, schistosomula are detected in the lung for up to 3 weeks following infection with RA cercariae, and a proportion therefrom are located extravascularly within the alveoli [33–39]. Schistosomula transforming from cercariae attenuated with low doses of irradiation may make their route to the liver, but usually fail to copulate and lay eggs [35,39]. Accordingly, RA schistosome larvae confer high levels of protection without causing pathological symptoms [3].

The failure of schistosomula derived from RA cercariae to migrate beyond the lung stage was attributed to the impact of irradiation on the parasite neuromuscular function with consequent lower mobility, slow alternating body extensions and contractions, and limited maximum body elongation and extension [40]. In support, microarray examination of the gene expression in cultured schistosomula derived from normal and RA cercariae revealed down-regulation of transcripts encoding G-protein-coupled and neuro receptors, resulting into diminished parasite response to external stimuli and giving an explanation to the extended transit through skin-draining lymph nodes and the lung [41]. Radiation attenuation of S. mansoni larvae was reported to lead to profound inhibition of protein and glycoprotein synthesis and radiolysis of surface carbohydrates that likely enhance the immunogenicity of the larval antigens and/or stimulate exposure of cryptic epitopes [42–45]. No studies are, however, available to delineate whether the death of RA schistosomula in the lungs is a result of the radiation insult and/or to the host immune effector responses. This question might be resolved by tracking the fate of RA cercariae in thymectomized or anti-thymocyte serum-treated mice [46].

Effects on challenge worm burden and fecundity

Immunization of mice with 60Co-attenuated (46–96 krad) larvae of S. mansoni, once or twice, resulted in a 70% reduction in challenge worm burden administered 3 and up to 15 weeks after immunization [4,7]. Treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or excision of sites of infection following immunization revealed that RA larvae need to persist in the host for between 1 and 2 weeks to stimulate optimum protection. Antigens released during protracted stay in the skin and lung likely induce the effector immune responses mediating the resistance to challenge infection [34,35,47,48]. Elucidating the challenge parasites major attrition site was a subject of controversy. Thus, in inbred CBA/Ca mice exposed to 400 S. mansoni cercariae attenuated with 20 krad of 60Co irradiation, challenge parasites were found to be killed within the first 4 days after challenge, i.e., at the skin stage [12,49–51]. Conversely, in mice immunized by exposure to S. mansoni RA cercariae (50 krad, 2 krad/min of 60Co radiation), mincing and incubation [52] as well as autoradiographic studies of challenge infection with approximately 200 L-(75Se) selenomethionine-labeled but otherwise normal cercariae indicated that worm elimination occurs after the skin stage, essentially in the lungs [12,33,34,39,53–56]. Challenge schistosomula were found to reach the liver in reduced numbers or are killed or cleared extravascularly in the liver in greater number in immunized mice, suggesting that the liver is a site of challenge worm attrition in mice immunized with RA larvae [53] or previously infected mice as well [57]. In guinea pigs vaccinated with 60Co-RA (20 krad) S. mansoni cercariae, and challenged 4–5 weeks after immunization with normal cercariae, lung-stage or 2–6 week-old parasites, the liver appeared to be an important attrition site [58]. Combined microautoradiographic and histopathological studies revealed that immune elimination of challenge larvae does not result from a cytolytic hit, but is essentially due to extravascular exit during migration. Schistosomula surrounded by leukocytic foci in alveoli or in the vasculature did not show any attached leukocyte and appeared entirely free of structural damage [59].

Immune protection was found to be schistosome species-specific as mice exposed to 20 krad-irradiated S. mansoni cercariae showed 53–67% reduction in homologous challenge worm burden, while heterologous vaccination with S. bovis, S. haematobium, or S. japonicum conferred only 5–12% protection [60]. The RA vaccine cross-protection in mice was limited to species of the S. haematobium, but not S. mansoni, group [61]. In inbred mice immunized with UV-irradiated cercariae of S. mansoni or S. haematobium, homologous protection ranged from 56% to 69% for S. mansoni and 88% to 99% for S. haematobium. Significant heterologous protection was consistently induced against S. haematobium by immunization with S. mansoni, but not against S. mansoni by immunization with S. haematobium [62]. Moreover, induction of resistance with RA cercariae of S. mansoni varied with mouse strain, with C57BL/6 showing the highest and P/N the lowest level of reduction in challenge worm burden [63–65].

The RA schistosome vaccine induced a high level of protective immunity in experimental rodent hosts and importantly was also efficacious in baboons, whereby 9000 cercariae attenuated by exposure to 30–60 krad of gamma radiation induced >50% protection to a challenge with normal larvae [17]. Significant protection, with 64–89% reductions in worm burden and parallel reductions in egg production, was achieved in baboons immunized with gamma-irradiated S. haematobium cercariae [66]. Cynomolgus monkeys im-injected with 60Co (50 krad at 4 krad/min)-RA S. mansoni tailless cercariae had 52% fewer challenge worm, and at 7 weeks post-challenge excreted 80% fewer eggs than did the control animals [6].

The data together gave strong evidence that protective immunity could be induced against schistosome infection. The RA vaccine-mediated protection was invariably partial, with surviving worms able to copulate, and daily deposit hundreds of eggs [67]. Moreover, the RA vaccine did not result in significant decrease in challenge worm fecundity in CBA and C57BL/6 mice immunized once or more with gamma-irradiated S. mansoni larvae [7,11]. Inbred and outbred mice receiving one exposure to UV RA S. mansoni cercariae, and challenged five weeks later with approximately 100 normal cercariae were assessed for worm burden and worm egg counts in liver and intestine at 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks after infection. Reduction in worm burden varied between 27 and 65% (8 experiments). Decrease in egg counts and female fecundity was highly significant in vaccinated versus control mice at 5, 6, and 7 weeks after challenge. At 8 weeks after challenge, the egg count/mouse and per female worm was similar in immunized and control mice suggesting that the RA vaccine-mediated decrease in worm egg load is only transient [68]. In studies complete regarding egg sampling, significant reduction in fecundity of challenge worms was not observed in baboons immunized with S. haematobium [66], or S. mansoni [69] RA cryopreserved schistosomula.

RA vaccine-induced immune responses

Skin

Vaccination of CBA or C57BL mice with RA cercariae induces localized skin inflammatory foci comprising 50% macrophages and 50% eosinophils at the site of immunization that appeared to be responsible for attrition of challenge parasite within few days of entry [51,70]. In support, ip injection of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific to neutrophils, but apparently also effective against macrophages and eosinophils, on the day of challenge, greatly reduced (67% mean reduction) the RA-induced resistance [71]. Moreover, passive transfer of serum from RA vaccine-protected mice was able to transfer resistance against challenge infection in mice via induction of subdermal inflammatory reactions, comprising 60% mononuclear cells and 40% eosinophils [72]. Whole body irradiation of RA cercariae-immunized CBA mice 3 days prior to challenge infection revealed that eosinophils, rather than macrophages, are central to the RA vaccine-induced protection [73].

The importance of the skin-draining lymph nodes (LN) for the RA vaccine-mediated immunity was shown in mice percutaneously immunized once with 500 S. mansoni cercariae attenuated with 20 krad 60Co radiation, LN draining the vaccination site removed five days prior, or 5, 10, 15, or 20 days after vaccination, and challenged 35 days post-immunization with 200 normal cercariae. Highly significant reduction in resistance to challenge infection was observed in the lympho-adenectomized as compared to intact mice. The results were construed to suggest that for induction of immune protection, presentation of antigens to leukocytes in the draining LN during the first days of RA larvae skin residence is more important than antigen presentation to the spleen cells (SC) during larval intravascular migration [74]. This assumption was supported by finding marked increase in T-, and to a greater extent of B-lymphocytes in skin- and lung-draining LN, but not in spleen of C57Bl/6 mice on days 2–14 post 1× vaccination with S. mansoni cercariae attenuated with 20 krad from a 60Co source [75]. Localized hyperemia (increased blood flow) appeared to explain the accumulations of lymphocytes in draining LN [76]. This finding suggests that leukocytes in draining LN may well be stimulated by larval antigens released intravascularly and not uniquely by antigens released extravascularly, in the dermis or lung parenchyma [77]. The draining LN leukocytes of RA cercariae-vaccinated mice were shown to be essentially of the CD4+ type and responded to parasite antigens by production of T helper (Th) dominant immune responses, notably increased production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin (IL)-12 [78–82]. Yet, these LN cells released significant amounts of IL-4 and did not generate an anamnestic Th1 response to parasite antigens after challenge infection whereby IFN-γ production was profoundly down-regulated and large amounts of IL-4 were generated [83].

The results together certainly indicate that RA S. mansoni vaccine-induced protection of mice to challenge infection is dependent on site of vaccination-draining LN build-up of Th1 and Th2-immune responses.

Lung

Schistosomula must negotiate the thin-walled and convoluted pulmonary capillaries before attaining the liver sinusoids and then the portal vein. The migration is obligatorily intravascular, but during the strenuous journey in the lung, many larvae are detected in the alveolar spaces, destined to disintegrate and die [59,84,85]. The larval-derived antigens stimulate intense immune responses characterized by accumulation of lymphocytes and macrophages in dense foci. Similar events occur in RA cercariae-vaccinated rodents with a larger proportion of migrating schistosomula ending into the alveolar spaces and surrounded by larger leukocytic foci [85–91]. These inflammatory foci are generated in response to antigens derived from larvae destined to die, and there is no proof they are the agents responsible for parasite attrition in normal or RA cercariae-immunized mice. Indeed, in spite of the inflammation, no direct lethal cytolytic hit to the schistosomula was observed [59,85,87,92,93]. Intravascular healthy larvae release extremely minute amounts of molecules, the excretory–secretory products (ESP), the scent, and attract no or minute foci [59,92,93]. Intravascular dying or dead larvae, especially in RA vaccine-administered mice, stimulate more or less intense inflammatory foci characterized by the presence of large numbers of eosinophils [92,93]. Some histopathological studies showed the intravascular leukocytic loci destroy the blood-air barrier, thus facilitating larval exit and subsequent death, but also blood spill in the alveoli, a phenomenon rarely, if never, observed [85]. Conversely, it was reported that pulmonary intravascular foci around larvae are rather small [59,92,93]. The results together do not provide conclusive evidence that the inflammatory foci in the lung parenchyma are the agents responsible for parasite deflection in the alveoli.

The dogma stipulating that immune responses to challenge schistosome infection following RA cercariae vaccination must be Th1 polarized to achieve protection has its foundation in several studies that measured C57BL/6 mice bronchoalveolar lavage leukocytes (BAL) immune responses to parasite antigens. As stated above, BAL are situated in lung parenchyma and alveolar tissue and are stimulated by antigens released by extravasated dying larvae. Schistosome larval antigens predominantly induce Th1-related responses [78,94–98]. Accordingly, it is expected that BAL release Th1-related cytokines upon culture in vitro in the absence or presence of larval antigens [80,95]. Yet, there is no proof that the BAL-mediated Th1 immune responses are major players in extravasation of challenge intravascularly migrating worms.

Spleen

Schistosomes are obligatory intravascular residents. Like other blood-born antigens, ESP released by healthy parasites and molecules derived from intravascularly dying, dead and degenerated worms reach the spleen, are trapped by residents macrophages and dendritic cells (DC), and stimulate T and B lymphocytes that circulate thereafter in tissue and blood [88]. Leukocytes in blood, rather than in tissue-draining LN, are the ones that interact with developing larvae and might mediate their extravasation and potential attrition. Yet, SC immune responses in the RA vaccine model were seldom looked at. C57BL/6 mice were percutaneously vaccinated with S. mansoni cercariae attenuated with 20 krad of gamma irradiation from a 60Co source, SC and LN cells obtained at 3 day interval for 24 days post-immunization, and tested for proliferation and cytokine release in response to soluble schistosomular (18 h-old larvae) antigens. Similarly to the axillary, inguinal and mediastinal LN, SC cultures released significant amounts of IFN-γ that reached a peak at day 18 post-vaccination; no information was shown related to SC IL-4 production [80]. Following challenge with 200 normal cercariae, SC differed from BAL in displaying vigorous proliferation but production of low levels of IFN-γ in response to in vitro stimulation with schistosomular antigens [95]. In our laboratory, SC obtained from C57BL/6 mice 1–6 weeks following secondary immunization with RA (25 krad of gamma irradiation from a 60Co source, or 330 μW/cm2 UV radiation) were found to consistently release IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-4 in response to in vitro stimulation with electroseparated soluble schistosomular or adult worm antigens [99,100].

T cell mediated or humoral immunity?

The association between leukocytic accumulations in the lung parenchyma of RA larvae-vaccinated and challenge cercariae-infected mice and high protection levels led to the assumption that resistance in vaccinated mice may be T cell rather antibody-mediated [84,85]. In RA cercariae once vaccinated mice, results were compatible with that hypothesis and further stressed that the mechanism of immunity depends on T lymphocytes-macrophages interaction triggered by antigens released from lung larvae, leading to focal cell-mediated effector immune responses that block onward challenge larvae migration and cause their deflection in the alveoli and attrition [84–93,101]. The results together suggested that challenge larvae are predominantly eliminated through delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions [79,90]. In support, mice of the P/N strain that are characterized as deficient in their ability to mount DTH and macrophage activity, and mice of the 129 strain with disruption of the gene encoding the tumor necrosis factor receptor consistently failed to display resistance to challenge infection following once vaccination [65,102]. In contrast, nitric oxide produced by leukocytes accumulations in the lung tissue of RA cercariae vaccinated mice was shown to be not essential for challenge parasite elimination [103]. Additionally, one-third of B cell-deficient C57BL/6 mice vaccinated once with RA cercariae failed to display resistance to challenge infection [104].

T cell and antibody reactivity to larval antigens in mouse strains differing in their level of resistance to challenge infection following once RA cercariae vaccination appeared to be of importance for the development of protection [64]. These findings were supported in mice made deficient in T or B lymphocytes [105]. A strong evidence for the importance of antibodies came from studies of Mangold and Dean [106] who conclusively showed that passive iv transfer of serum obtained from C57BL/6 mice 3 weeks following last (of 2–3) immunization with RA (50 krad from a 60Co source) S. mansoni cercariae into syngeneic naive mice elicited reductions in challenge worm burdens of 20–50%. The highest level of protection was achieved when immune serum was administered at a time coincident with larval migration in the pulmonary vasculature. The antibody-mediated protection levels were never as high as in the donor mice, implying that other immune effector arms, likely cell-mediated immunity, are required for optimal resistance [106] and Table 1. Highly significant protection was also achieved in C57BL/6 mice upon passive transfer of serum from RA S. mansoni cercariae vaccinated rabbits [107]. The serum fraction responsible for resistance transfer was conclusively shown to be antibodies of the IgG class [106,107]. Similar results were obtained in BALB/c mice passive transferred with RA S. mansoni vaccine immune serum from syngeneic mice or rabbits [108] and were entirely confirmed in the RA S. japonicum vaccine model [109]. Furthermore, protective immunity displayed by baboons vaccinated with RA S. mansoni cercariae was suggested to essentially be antibody-dependent [110]. In mice, the titer of antibodies following RA cercariae immunization appeared of critical importance for the development of resistance to challenge infection [111].

Table 1.

RA cercariae vaccine efficacy varies with host species and strain immune responses.

RA vaccine Host species and strain Protection level Immunity References
S. mansoni Mouse C57BL/6 75–90% Th1 and Th2 [3,11,136]
S. mansoni Mouse BALB/c 30–60% High DTH [65]
S. mansoni Mouse CBA 4–66% Low Ab levels [136]
S. mansoni Mouse P/N 10%-20% Low DTH and Th1 [65,118]
S. mansoni Baboons 30–54% High IgM/IgG [17]
S. japonicum Mouse CBA/H 50–72% High Ab levels [109]
S. japonicum Mouse C57BL/6 2–40% Low Th1 and Th2 [32]

DTH = delayed-type hypersensitivity; Ab = antibody.

Th1 versus Th2?

Treatment of RA cercariae once vaccinated-mice with neutralizing mAb to mouse IL-4, IL-5, or IFN-γ, on day 14 or 7, and day 1 before and again at weekly intervals after challenge infection indicated a preponderant role for IFN-γ-dependent cell-mediated effector mechanisms in the elicited protection, while IL-4, IL-5, and eosinophils are of negligible importance [112]. Yet, mice with disrupted IFN-γ receptor gene displayed an impaired, yet not abrogated, resistance to challenge infection following vaccination with RA S. mansoni cercariae; of note, the reduction in worm burdens in wild type was in the range of a modest 50% [113]. The results, thus, suggest that IFN-γ-independent mechanisms are necessary for optimal protection in the RA vaccine model. Additionally, all cytokine measurements concentrated on BAL and/or total lung tissue [113,114] while it must be reiterated that S. mansoni strive inside the blood vasculature in lungs and elsewhere. In contrast to conclusions reported using mice treated with a mAb targeting inducible nitric oxide synthase [103], nitric oxide direct effector functions and its role in activation of macrophages and endothelial cells for killing migrating larvae were advocated as key elements in the acquisition of protection in the murine RA vaccine model [114,115]. The debate over the effector functions of nitric oxide in protection against schistosome infection is not as yet settled [116,117]. On the other hand, lung tissue or SC production of IL-4, IL-13, IL-10 and other Th2-related cytokine responses appeared to be responsible for the overall limited protection in high [115] and low [118] responder mice.

Different results were attained with 50 krad RA (from a 137Cs source) S. mansoni cercariae once or thrice vaccination of B cell-deficient mice, whereby challenge worm burden reductions were only 33–43%, considerably less than wild type mouse. Additionally, the decrease in protection in IFN-γ knockout mice was not striking compared to wild type counterparts vaccinated in parallel with RA S. mansoni cercariae once (46% versus 63%) or thrice (64% versus 80%) [119]. Moreover, signaling via IL-4 receptor alpha chain was absolutely required for significant RA cercariae vaccination-mediated resistance in BALB/c mice [120]. Finally, several studies using knockout mice closed the controversy by conclusively demonstrating that optimal protection in the RA vaccine model is dependent on the induction of both type-1 and type-2-associated immune responses [121–123].

Molecules recognized by antibodies and lymphocytes of RA-immunized hosts

Antibodies of C57BL/6 mice exposed twice via tail immersion to approximately 500 S. mansoni RA (50 krad) cercariae selectively bound to several schistosomular molecules, notably a 38 kDa glycoprotein of in vitro cultured 5 day-old schistosomula, seven adult worm antigens among which a 94–97 kDa glycoprotein, as well as, an antigen of 200 kDa present in schistosomular and adult worm soluble extracts [124–127]. A cDNA encoding a 62 kDa portion of the 200 kDa molecule was cloned and sequenced and found to share homology with myosins of other species; subcutaneous or ip immunization of C57BL/6 mice with the expressed recombinant protein, designated rIrV-5, elicited 75% protection against challenge worm burden [127]. Similar studies led to identification of SmIrV1, which showed homology to calnexin and calreticulin [128,129]. Additionally, studies with SC of mice vaccinated with RA S. mansoni cercariae used to produce mAb against newly transformed schistosomular surface antigen resulted into selection of a larval surface membrane 18 kDa polypeptide. Polyclonal antibodies generated against the 18 kDa molecule isolated recombinant clones from an adult worm cDNA library constructed in λgt11 [130]. The target molecule was found to be of exactly 23 kDa, designated Sm23, and identified as worm integral surface transmembrane antigen and glycosyl inositol phosphatidyl-anchored as well [131]. Furthermore, antibodies of RA S. mansoni cercariae-vaccinated CBA mice were found to specifically recognize schistosomulum surface antigens of >200, 38, 32, 20, and 15 kDa. The >200 and 15 kDa molecules were also recognized by CBA mice immunized with RA S. haematobium cercariae; conversely, the molecules of the 20–38 kDa range showed species-specificity [132,133], thus indicating that some, but, not all schistosome molecules confer cross-protection. Most importantly, when vaccinated mice of the C57BL/6 and CBA strain were compared, both strains recognized Sm23, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and cathepsin B, thus suggesting that these molecules may be used for vaccination of different mouse strains, in contrast to Sm32 and paramyosin that were recognized only by CBA, and heat shock protein 70 exclusively by C57BL/6 mice [134].

Since T cells mediate cellular immunity and control antibody production, it was of importance to identify the schistosome antigens recognized by T cells as well as humoral antibodies of mice vaccinated with RA S. mansoni cercariae. Axillary LN cells of C57BL/6 and CBA mice vaccinated once with cercariae attenuated with 15 or 50 k of gamma irradiation were in vitro stimulated with adult worm antigens fractionated by isoelectric focusing. The LN cells proliferative and lymphokine responses and humoral antibody binding revealed that Sm23, paramyosin, heat shock protein 70, triose phosphate isomerase (TPI), and GST appeared to be the molecules that stimulate the most intense immune responses in the murine RA vaccine model [135,136]. We have used the T cell western and western blotting assays to identify the schistosomular and adult worm antigens recognized by LN and spleen T cells and serum antibody of outbred and inbred mice immunized twice with gamma or UV-radiation-attenuated S. mansoni cercariae [99,100,137]. The molecules most consistently recognized, and presumably of importance in inducing resistance against challenge infection in this model, were selected and identified as S. mansoni enolase, and S. mansoni calreticulin [99,100,138,139].

Some of the molecules putatively responsible for the induction of protection against challenge infection following RA cercariae vaccination, notably IrV5, Sm23, paramyosin, GST, TPI-derived peptides in a multiple antigen construct (MAP), probably emulsified in Freund’s or alum were used in controlled vaccination and protection studies in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. None succeeded in inducing protection higher than the 40% benchmark sent by the World Health Organization for progression of schistosome vaccine antigens into pre- and clinical trials [140,141].

The outcome of the missed lessons

The majority of the murine RA vaccine model studies concentrated on the C57BL/6 strain because it proved to be the highest responder. BALB/c and CBA mice showed moderate response, A/J mice marginal resistance, while other strains, notably RF/J, and P/N appeared to display negligible protection following immunization with RA larvae [63–65]. These findings suggest that vaccination results using schistosome subunit antigens in preferred 2 or 3 inbred mouse strains may not be readily confirmed in other laboratories using different mouse strains, or extrapolated to the outbred humans. Nevertheless, the majority of studies related to development of a schistosomiasis vaccine disregarded this limitation, over-relied on the C57BL/6 strain, and neglected the use of outbred mice. Fortunately, several schistosome vaccine studies were performed in baboons, despite the challenges of the costs and experimental settings [110,142–148].

In every histopathological or mincing/incubation study regarding the RA vaccine model, no evidence was ever obtained for tight adherence of leukocytes to the lung-stage schistosomula surface, direct cytolytic hit, or structural damage presumably mediated by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [39,52,56,59,67,84–87,89–93]. These results were in entire accord with the plethora of articles documenting the inaccessibility of healthy schistosome surface membrane antigens to antibody binding and the insusceptibility of developing larvae to antibody-dependent attrition mechanisms [9, reviewed in 149,150]. These well-established, confirmed, and reproducible findings imply that parasite surface membrane or tegumental antigens may not mediate access of effector immune responses to challenge infection parasites whether in the dermis or during intravascular migration and residence. Nevertheless, the great majority of articles focused on schistosome surface membrane or tegumental molecules as vaccine candidates, notwithstanding the fact that if surface membrane molecules were at any time accessible to the host effector immune responses, the parasite would not survive days, not to mention decades, in the host blood stream. The outcome of this lessons neglect is obtention of protection against challenge infection of limited significance (< 0.05–<0.01) and reduction percentages of 30–40% that are not reproduced from experiment to experiment, leading to damping of these molecules out of the vaccine candidate list [reviewed in 149,150]. An outstanding example was the S. mansoni glucose transporter SGTP4, a molecule at the host-parasite interface of critical importance for the parasite survival [151]. Vaccination of outbred and inbred mice with the molecule extracellular domains in recombinant or synthetic peptide constructs and emulsified in Freund’s adjuvant induced considerable cellular and humoral immune responses but entirely failed to provide protection against challenge S. mansoni infection [152]. Fortunately, however, several antigens readily released from invading worms and potential inducers of protection in the RA vaccine model were used as vaccine candidates among which calpain [143–148], GST [142], which has now moved to phase 1 clinical trials [153], and paramyosin, whereby recombinant full-length S. japonicum paramyosin, rSj97 was produced and assessed for efficacy and safety in rodents and large-animal models [154].

One of the salient lessons gained from the extensive studies concerning the RA vaccine model is that protection elicited essentially depends on both Th1 and Th2-associated immune responses [3]. Since schistosome candidate vaccine molecules are documented to stimulate polarized Th1-related immune reactivity, it was of importance to look for and use an adjuvant that would skew the immunogen-induced polarized Th1 toward the Th2 immunity axis. That did not happen. On the contrary, many candidate vaccines, including calpain, were used as DNA constructs known to predominantly elicit Th1-related responses [143–145 and reviewed in 150,155]. We have used the candidate vaccine antigen and larval ESP, S. mansoni glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (SG3PDH) in a recombinant (r), linear peptide or MAP form, emulsified in Freund’s or other Th1 adjuvants for immunization of outbred and inbred mice and only obtained occasional, and barely significant (< 0.05) reduction in challenge worm burden and egg load of less than 35% [156–159]. We have used other larval ESP, notably S. mansoni 14-3-3 and p18 protein in a recombinant form, and aldolase, calpain, and thioredoxin peroxidase (TPX) = 2 cys peroxiredoxin-derived peptides in MAP constructs emulsified in Freund’s adjuvant or aluminum hydroxide for immunization of C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice. While the molecules were strongly immunogenic, eliciting biased Th1-related immune responses whether administered in conjunction with Freund’s adjuvant or alum, the protection levels were suboptimal and rather erratic [160]. Not very different results were attained with the numerous trials using S. mansoni or S. japonicum tegumental and surface membrane associated molecules in conjunction with Th1-biased adjuvants for immunization of inbred mice [reviewed in 149,150,161]. The outcome is up of today, the schistosomiasis vaccine still remains an unmet clinical need [123,149].

The outcome of the well-learned lessons

We have learned our lessons and focused on the use of larval ESP, such as SG3PDH and TPX, relied on outbred mice, and most importantly performed extensive studies to find an adjuvant that would skew these molecules-mediated Th1 responses toward the Th2 axis. We found that alum [160], polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid and peptidoglycan [162] drive C57BL/6 and BALB/c to respond to S. mansoni larval ESP by production of IFN-γ and IL-17. Conversely, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), the master regulator of type 2 responses, succeeded in directing the larval ESP-mediated immune responses toward a Th2-biased profile in prototypical Th1 and Th2 mice [162]. We thus understood that the type 2 cytokines, notably TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33, which stimulate the group 2 innate lymphoid cells [163–165] and type-2-cytokines-inducing molecules such as the cysteine peptidase, papain [166,167], are the immunomodulatory adjuvants needed to drive larval ESP-mediated vaccination toward generation of type 2-associated immune responses. Challenge infection larvae are, thus, met by both Th1- and Th2 cell- dependent immunity, as studies of the RA vaccine model recommended. Administration of outbred mice with rSG3PDH and TPX MAP in conjunction with papain, TSLP, IL-25, or IL-33 consistently and reproducibly elicited Th1- and Th2-associated cytokines and antibodies, and significant (< 0.0001) reductions of a minimum of 50% and up to 78% in challenge worm burden and worm egg counts [168]. Since schistosome cysteine peptidases are both ESP and potential type-2 cytokines-inducers, it was reasonable to assess their protective potential in outbred mice alone or as adjuvants to the larval ESP, rSG3PDH and TPX MAP. The considerable and highly significant (< 0.0001) reduction of 50–83% in worm burdens and worm egg load in each of 7 consecutive experiments, each involving 4–8 animal groups, led us to devise a formula for the schistosomiasis vaccine, notably rSG3PDH+ S. mansoni cathepsin B+ S. mansoni cathepsin L. The latter peptidase was required for its potential role in worm reproduction and impact on eliminating the Th2 cytokine-associated transient increase in challenge worm fecundity [169,170]. Benefiting from another lesson of the RA vaccine model, notably that S. mansoni molecules may protect hosts against S. haematobium infection [62], we have vaccinated outbred mice and hamsters with the S. mansoni antigens mentioned in the formula and obtained consistent, reproducible, and highly significant (< 0.0001) reductions of 70% in challenge worm burden and worm egg counts [171].

Accordingly, we recommend retesting the various available schistosome candidate vaccine antigens, notably calpain, GST, TPI, enolase, paramyosin, and Sm14 in conjunction with cathepsin B and cathepsin L for their protective potential in laboratory outbred rodents and baboons against challenge S. mansoni, S. haematobium, and S. japonicum infection. Evidence regarding the longevity of the generated protection must be established in an aim of achieving the highly coveted goal of a sterilizing schistosomiasis vaccine.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge funding of The Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt, Grant No. 2073 to R. El Ridi.

Biographies

graphic file with name fx3.jpg

Rashika El Ridi, Ph.D., D.Sc., is a Professor of Immunology at the Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Egypt. Her responsibilities involved teaching the different branches of immunology to under- and post-graduate students and directing research in immunology funded by NIH, Sandoz Gerontological Foundation, Schistosomiasis Research Project (SRP), the Egyptian Academy of Scientific Research and Technology; the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology and the World Health Organization; the Arab Foundation for Science and Technology, and she supervised 60 M.Sc. and 30 Ph.D. Theses and published 85 papers in international, peer-reviewed journals. She obtained for these continuous efforts, the State Award of Excellence in High-Tech Sciences, 2002, and 2010; the Cairo University Award for Recognition in Applied Sciences, 2002, and the D.Sc. degree in Immunobiology, 2004.

graphic file with name fx4.jpg

Hatem Tallima graduated from the American University in Cairo (AUC) in year 2000, cum laude in Chemistry, and obtained his Ph.D. degree from the Faculty of Science, Cairo University, year 2006. He has 28 publications in international, peer-reviewed journals, h index 11 and 292 citations. He teaches Organic and Bio Chemistry at AUC and is involved in development of a drug and a vaccine against schistosomiasis in the Immunology Laboratories, Faculty of Science, Cairo University.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Cairo University.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization Schistosomiasis: population requiring preventive chemotherapy and number of people treated in 2010 [pdf 873kb] Weekly Epidemiol Rec. 2012;87(4):37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murray C.J., Vos T., Lozano R., Naghavi M., Flaxman A.D., Michaud C. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coulson P.S. The radiation-attenuated vaccine against schistosomes in animal models: paradigm for a human vaccine? Adv Parasitol. 1997;39:271–336. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Minard P., Dean D.A., Jacobson R.H., Vannier W.E., Murrell K.D. Immunization of mice with cobalt-60 irradiated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(1 Pt 1):76–86. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eveland L.K., Morse S.I. Schistosoma mansoni: infectivity and immunizing effects of in vitro derived schistosomula attenuated by X irradiation. Exp Parasitol. 1978;45(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(78)90040-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murrell K.D., Clark S.S., Dean D.A., Vannier W.E. Schistosoma mansoni: immunization of cynomolgus monkeys by injection of irradiated schistosomula. Exp Parasitol. 1979;48(3):415–420. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(79)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bickle Q.D., Taylor M.G., Doenhoff M.J., Nelson G.S. Immunization of mice with gamma-irradiated intramuscularly injected schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1979;79(2):209–222. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000053294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dean D.A., Cioli D., Bukowski M.A. Resistance induced by normal and irradiated Schistosoma mansoni: ability of various worm stages to serve as inducers and targets in mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981;30(5):1026–1032. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sher A., Benno D. Decreasing immunogenicity of developing schistosome larvae. Parasite Immunol. 1982;4(2):101–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1982.tb00423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coulson P.S., Mountford A.P. Fate of attenuated schistosomula administered to mice by different routes, relative to the immunity induced against Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1989;99(Pt 1):39–45. doi: 10.1017/s003118200006100x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reynolds S.R., Harn D.A. Comparison of irradiated-cercaria schistosome vaccine models that use 15- and 50-kilorad doses: the 15-kilorad dose gives greater protection, smaller liver sizes, and higher gamma interferon levels after challenge. Infect Immun. 1992;60(1):90–94. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.1.90-94.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miller K.L., Smithers S.R. Schistosoma mansoni: the attrition of a challenge infection in mice immunized with highly irradiated live cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1980;50(2):212–221. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(80)90022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stek M., Jr., Minard P., Dean D.A., Hall J.E. Immunization of baboons with Schistosoma mansoni cercariae attenuated by gamma irradiation. Science. 1981;212(4502):1518–1520. doi: 10.1126/science.7233238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bushara H.O., Hussein M.F., Saad A.M., Taylor M.G., Dargie J.D., Marshall T.F. Immunization of calves against Schistosoma bovis using irradiated cercariae or schistosomula of S. bovis. Parasitology. 1978;77(Pt 3):303–311. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000050265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsü S.Y., Xu S.T., He Y.X., Shi F.H., Shen W., Hsü H.F. Vaccination of bovines against schistosomiasis japonica with highly irradiated schistosomula in China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33(5):891–898. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stek M., Jr., Minard P., Cruess D.F. Murine immunization by cesium-137 irradiation attenuated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. J Parasitol. 1984;70(3):398–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yole D.S., Pemberton R., Reid G.D., Wilson R.A. Protective immunity to Schistosoma mansoni induced in the olive baboon Papio anubis by the irradiated cercaria vaccine. Parasitology. 1996;112(Pt 1):37–46. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000065057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yole D.S., Reid G.D., Wilson R.A. Protection against Schistosoma mansoni and associated immune responses induced in the vervet monkey Cercopithecus aethiops by the irradiated cercaria vaccine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;54(3):265–270. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1996.54.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hsü S.Y., Hsü H.F., Burmeister L.F. Schistosoma mansoni: vaccination of mice with highly X-irradiated cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1981;52(1):91–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(81)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hsü S.Y., Hsü H.F., Osborne J.W., Johnson S.C. Schistosoma mansoni: is acquired immunity induced by highly X-irradiated cercariae dependent on the size of the challenging dose? J Parasitol. 1982;68(2):199–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Hsü S.Y., Hsü H.F., Penick G.D., Lust G.L., Eveland L.K. Schistosoma japonicum: highly irradiated cercariae as a test for specific immunity in rhesus monkeys. Exp Parasitol. 1977;43(1):189–195. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(77)90022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hsü S.Y., Hsü H.F., Xu S.T., Shi F.H., He Y.X., Clarke W.R. Vaccination against bovine Schistosomiasis japonica with highly X-irradiated schistosomula. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32(2):367–370. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghandour A.M., Magid M.A. Homologous immunity in schistosomiasis mansoni using ultra-violet irradiated cercariae. J Helminthol. 1978;52(4):303–304. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00005526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dean D.A., Murrell K.D., Xu S.T., Mangold B.L. Immunization of mice with ultraviolet-irradiated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae: a re-evaluation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32(4):790–793. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kamiya H., Ozaki T., Nakayama H., Inaba T. Immunizing potential of ultraviolet-attenuated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni in rodent hosts. Parasitol Res. 1993;79(4):293–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00932184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kamiya H., Nakayama H., Yoshimura K. Defect of resistance in male gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, vaccinated with gamma-irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni against a homologous challenge infection. J Parasitol. 1993;79(4):616–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ruppel A., Shi Y.E., Moloney N.A. Schistosoma mansoni and S. japonicum: comparison of levels of ultraviolet irradiation for vaccination of mice with cercariae. Parasitology. 1990;101(Pt 1):23–26. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000079701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shi Y.E., Jiang C.F., Han J.J., Li Y.L., Ruppel A. Schistosoma japonicum: an ultraviolet-attenuated cercarial vaccine applicable in the field for water buffaloes. Exp Parasitol. 1990;71(1):100–106. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shi Y.E., Jiang C.F., Han J.J., Li Y.L., Ruppel A. Immunization of pigs against infection with Schistosoma japonicum using ultraviolet-attenuated cercariae. Parasitology. 1993;106(Pt 5):459–462. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000076745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tian F., Lin D., Wu J., Gao Y., Zhang D., Ji M. Immune events associated with high level protection against Schistosoma japonicum infection in pigs immunized with UV-attenuated cercariae. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lin D., Tian F., Wu H., Gao Y., Wu J., Zhang D. Multiple vaccinations with UV-attenuated cercariae in pig enhance protective immunity against Schistosoma japonicum infection as compared to single vaccination. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:103. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang M., Tian F., Gao Y., Ji M., Wu G. Ultraviolet- attenuated cercariae of Schistosoma japonicum fail to effectively induce a Th1 response in spite of up-regulating expression of cytotoxicity-related genes in C57BL/6 mice. J Biomed Res. 2010;24(4):277–284. doi: 10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60039-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Minard P., Dean D.A., Vannier W.E., Murrell K.D. Effect of immunization on migration of Schistosoma mansoni through lungs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(1):87–93. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mastin A.J., Bickle Q.D., Wilson R.A. Schistosoma mansoni: migration and attrition of irradiated and challenge schistosomula in the mouse. Parasitology. 1983;87(Pt 1):87–102. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000052446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mangold B.L., Dean D.A. The migration and survival of gamma-irradiated Schistosoma mansoni larvae and the duration of host-parasite contact in relation to the induction of resistance in mice. Parasitology. 1984;88(Pt 2):249–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mountford A.P., Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Antigen localization and the induction of resistance in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1988;97(Pt 1):11–25. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000066701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kamiya H., McLaren D.J. Schistosoma mansoni: migration potential of normal and radiation attenuated parasites in naive guinea pigs. Exp Parasitol. 1987;63(1):98–107. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(87)90082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumagai M., Sato H., Kamiya H. Migrtaion kinetics of ultraviolet-attenuated Schistosoma mansoni in ICR mice. Jpn J Parasitol. 1992;41(4):300–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wilson R.A. The saga of schistosome migration and attrition. Parasitology. 2009;136(12):1581–1592. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009005708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harrop R., Wilson R.A. Irradiation of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae impairs neuromuscular function in developing schistosomula. J Parasitol. 1993;79(2):286–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dillon G.P., Feltwell T., Skelton J., Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A., Ivens A.C. Altered patterns of gene expression underlying the enhanced immunogenicity of radiation-attenuated schistosomes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(5):e240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kusel J.R., Wales A., Vieira L., Wu K.Y. Effects of irradiation and tunicamycin on the surface glycoproteins of Schistosoma mansoni. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1989;84(Suppl 1):199–208. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761989000500020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wales A., Kusel J.R., Jones J.T. Inhibition of protein synthesis in irradiated larvae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol. 1992;14(5):513–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1992.tb00025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wales A., Kusel J.R. Biochemistry of irradiated parasite vaccines: suggested models for their mode of action. Parasitol Today. 1992;8(11):358–363. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(92)90167-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wales A., Fukumoto S.I., Otieno M.F., Kusel J.R. Effects of irradiation on surface carbohydrates of larvae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1993;106(Pt 2):117–125. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000074916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Harrison R.A., Doenhoff M.J. Retarded development of Schistosoma mansoni in immunosuppressed mice. Parasitology. 1983;86(Pt 3):429–438. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000050629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bickle Q.D. Studies on the relationship between the survival of Schistosoma mansoni larvae in mice and the degree of resistance produced. Parasitology. 1982;84(1):111–122. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000051702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bickle Q.D. Radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccination–a brief historical perspective. Parasitology. 2009;136(12):1621–1632. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009005848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Smithers S.R., Miller K.L. Protective immunity in murine Schistosomiasis mansoni: evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29(5):832–841. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1980.29.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller K.L., Smithers S.R., Sher A. The response of mice immune to Schistosoma mansoni to a challenge infection which bypasses the skin: evidence for two mechanisms of immunity. Parasite Immunol. 1981;3(1):25–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1981.tb00382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Miller K.L., Smithers S.R. Localized skin changes at the site of immunization with highly irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni are associated with enhanced resistance to a challenge infection. Parasitology. 1982;85(Pt 2):305–314. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000055281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stek M., Jr., Dean D.A., Clark S.S. Attrition of schistosomes in an irradiation-attenuated cercarial immunization model of Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981;30(5):1033–1038. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dean D.A., Mangold B.L., Georgi J.R., Jacobson R.H. Comparison of Schistosoma mansoni migration patterns in normal and irradiated cercaria-immunized mice by means of autoradiographic analysis. Evidence that worm elimination occurs after the skin phase in immunized mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33(1):89–96. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mangold B.L., Dean D.A., Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Site requirements and kinetics of immune-dependent elimination of intravascularly administered lung stage schistosomula in mice immunized with highly irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35(2):332–344. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dean D.A., Mangold B.L., Kassim O.O., Von Lichtenberg F. Sites and mechanisms of schistosome elimination. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1987;82(Suppl. 4):31–37. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761987000800007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dean D.A., Mangold B.L., Lewis F.A. Comparison of two strains of Schistosoma mansoni with respect to the sites and kinetics of immune elimination in irradiated cercaria-immunized mice. J Parasitol. 1995;81(1):43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dean D.A., Mangold B.L. Autoradiographic analysis of resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni in mice. Evidence that the liver is a major site of worm elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33(1):97–103. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McLaren D.J., Rogers M.V. Schistosoma mansoni: liver phase challenge attrition is a stage-dependent phenomenon in guinea-pigs vaccinated with highly irradiated cercariae. Parasite Immunol. 1986;8(4):307–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1986.tb00848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kassim O.O., Dean D.A., Mangold B.L., Von Lichtenberg F. Combined microautoradiographic and histopathologic analysis of the fate of challenge Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula in mice immunized with irradiated cercariae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;47(2):231–237. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bickle Q.D., Andrews B.J., Doenhoff M.J., Ford M.J., Taylor M.G. Resistance against Schistosoma mansoni induced by highly irradiated infections: studies on species specificity of immunization and attempts to transfer resistance. Parasitology. 1985;90(Pt 2):301–312. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000051003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Navarrete S.1., Rollinson D., Agnew A.M. Cross-protection between species of the Schistosoma haematobium group induced by vaccination with irradiated parasites. Parasite Immunol. 1994;16(1):19–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dean D.A., Mangold B.L., Harrison R.A., Ricciardone M.D. Homologous and heterologous protective immunity to Egyptian strains of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium induced by ultraviolet-irradiated cercariae. Parasite Immunol. 1996;18(8):403–410. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1996.d01-129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Murrell K.D., Clark S., Dean D.A., Vannier W.E. Influence of mouse strain on induction of resistance with irradiated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. J Parasitol. 1979;65(5):829–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.James S.L., Labine M., Sher A. Mechanisms of protective immunity against Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae. I. Analysis of antibody and T-lymphocyte responses in mouse strains developing differing levels of immunity. Cell Immunol. 1981;65(1):75–83. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(81)90053-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.James S.L., Sher A. Mechanisms of protective immunity against Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae. III. Identification of a mouse strain, P/N, that fails to respond to vaccination. Parasite Immunol. 1983;5(6):567–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1983.tb00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Webbe G., Sturrock R.F., James E.R., James C. Schistosoma haematobium in the baboon (Papio anubis): effect of vaccination with irradiated larvae on the subsequent infection with percutaneously applied cercariae. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982;76(3):354–361. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90189-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dean D.A. Schistosoma and related genera: acquired resistance in mice. Exp Parasitol. 1983;55(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(83)90002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.El Ridi R., Ozaki T., Sato H., Inaba T., Kamiya H. Immunization of mice with ultraviolet-attenuated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni transiently reduces the fecundity of challenge worms. Int J Parasitol. 1997;27(5):581–586. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(97)00006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Damian R.T., Powell M.R., Roberts M.L., Clark J.D., Stirewalt M.A., Lewis F.A. Schistosoma mansoni: parasitology and immunology of baboons vaccinated with irradiated cryopreserved schistosomula. Int J Parasitol. 1985;15(3):333–344. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(85)90072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ward R.E., McLaren D.J. Schistosoma mansoni: evidence that eosinophils and/or macrophages contribute to skin-phase challenge attrition in vaccinated CBA/Ca mice. Parasitology. 1988;96(Pt 1):63–84. doi: 10.1017/s003118200008166x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.McLaren D.J., Strath M., Smithers S.R. Schistosoma mansoni: evidence that immunity in vaccinated and chronically infected CBA/Ca mice is sensitive to treatment with a monoclonal antibody that depletes cutaneous effector cells. Parasite Immunol. 1987;9(6):667–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1987.tb00537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McLaren D.J., Smithers S.R. Serum from CBA/Ca mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni protects naive recipients through the recruitment of cutaneous effector cells. Parasitology. 1988;97(Pt 2):287–302. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000058492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Delgado V.S., McLaren D.J. Evidence that radio-sensitive cells are central to skin-phase protective immunity in CBA/Ca mice vaccinated with radiation-attenuated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni as well as in naive mice protected with vaccine serum. Parasitology. 1990;100(Pt 1):45–56. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000060108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mountford A.P., Wilson R.A. Schistosoma mansoni: the effect of regional lymphadenectomy on the level of protection induced in mice by radiation-attenuated cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1990;71(4):463–469. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90072-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Constant S.L., Mountford A.P., Wilson R.A. Phenotypic analysis of the cellular responses in regional lymphoid organs of mice vaccinated against Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1990;101(Pt 1):15–22. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000079695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Constant S.L., Wilson R.A. In vivo lymphocyte responses in the draining lymph nodes of mice exposed to Schistosoma mansoni: preferential proliferation of T cells is central to the induction of protective immunity. Cell Immunol. 1992;139(1):145–161. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(92)90108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Riengrojpitak S., Anderson S., Wilson R.A. Induction of immunity to Schistosoma mansoni: interaction of schistosomula with accessory leucocytes in murine skin and draining lymph nodes. Parasitology. 1998;117(Pt 4):301–309. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098003187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vignali D.A., Crocker P., Bickle Q.D., Cobbold S., Waldmann H., Taylor M.G. A role for CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells in immunity to Schistosoma mansoni induced by 20 krad-irradiated and Ro 11-3128-terminated infections. Immunology. 1989;67(4):466–472. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ratcliffe E.C., Wilson R.A. The magnitude and kinetics of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1991;103(Pt 1):65–75. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000059308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pemberton R.M., Smythies L.E., Mountford A.P., Wilson R.A. Patterns of cytokine production and proliferation by T lymphocytes differ in mice vaccinated or infected with Schistosoma mansoni. Immunology. 1991;73(3):327–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mountford A.P., Coulson P.S., Pemberton R.M., Smythies L.E., Wilson R.A. The generation of interferon-gamma-producing T lymphocytes in skin-draining lymph nodes, and their recruitment to the lungs, is associated with protective immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Immunology. 1992;75(2):250–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hogg K.G., Kumkate S., Anderson S., Mountford A.P. Interleukin-12 p40 secretion by cutaneous CD11c+ and F4/80+ cells is a major feature of the innate immune response in mice that develop Th1-mediated protective immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Infect Immun. 2003;71(6):3563–3571. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3563-3571.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pemberton R.M., Wilson R.A. T-helper type-1-dominated lymph node responses induced in C57BL/6 mice by optimally irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni are down-regulated after challenge infection. Immunology. 1995;84(2):310–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Crabtree J.E., Wilson R.A. Schistosoma mansoni: an ultrastructural examination of pulmonary migration. Parasitology. 1986;92(Pt 2):343–354. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000064118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Crabtree J.E., Wilson R.A. The role of pulmonary cellular reactions in the resistance of vaccinated mice to Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol. 1986;8(3):265–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1986.tb01038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Aitken R., Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Pulmonary leukocytic responses are linked to the acquired immunity of mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1988;140(10):3573–3579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Examination of the mechanisms of pulmonary phase resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in vaccinated mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38(3):529–539. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Menson EN1, Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Schistosoma mansoni: circulating and pulmonary leucocyte responses related to the induction of protective immunity in mice by irradiated parasites. Parasitology. 1989;98(Pt 1):43–55. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000059679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Vignali D.A., Klaus S.N., Bickle Q.D., Taylor M.G. Histological examination of the cellular reactions around schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni in the lungs of sublethally irradiated and unirradiated, immune and control rats. Parasitology. 1989;98(Pt 1):57–65. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000059680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kambara T., Wilson R.A. In situ pulmonary responses of T cell and macrophage subpopulations to a challenge infection in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol. 1990;76(3):365–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ratcliffe E.C., Wilson R.A. The role of mononuclear-cell recruitment to the lungs in the development and expression of immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1992;104(Pt 2):299–307. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000061746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.von Lichtenberg F., Sher A., McIntyre S. A lung model of schistosome immunity in mice. Am J Pathol. 1977;87(1):105–123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Von Lichtenberg F., Correa-Oliveira R., Sher A. The fate of challenge schistosomula in the murine anti-schistosome vaccine model. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34(1):96–106. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mountford A.P., Harrop R., Wilson R.A. Antigens derived from lung-stage larvae of Schistosoma mansoni are efficient stimulators of proliferation and gamma interferon secretion by lymphocytes from mice vaccinated with attenuated larvae. Infect Immun. 1995;63(5):1980–1986. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.5.1980-1986.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Smythies L.E., Pemberton R.M., Coulson P.S., Mountford A.P., Wilson R.A. T cell-derived cytokines associated with pulmonary immune mechanisms in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1992;148(5):1512–1518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mountford A.P., Harrop R. Vaccination against Schistosomiasis: the case for lung-stage antigens. Parasitol Today. 1998;14(3):109–114. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(97)01169-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Harrop R., Jennings N., Mountford A.P., Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Characterization, cloning and immunogenicity of antigens released by transforming cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2000;121(Pt 4):385–394. doi: 10.1017/s003118209900640x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.El Ridi R., Tallima H., Mahana N., Dalton J.P. Innate immunogenicity and in vitro protective potential of Schistosoma mansoni lung schistosomula excretory–secretory candidate vaccine antigens. Microbes Infect. 2010;12(10):700–709. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Osman A., El Ridi R., Guirguis N., Dean D.A. Identification of Schistosoma mansoni antigens recognized by T cells of C57BL/6 mice immunized with gamma-irradiated cercariae. J Parasitol. 1994;80(3):421–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Osman A., el Ridi R., Guirguis N., Dean D.A. Identification of Schistosoma mansoni antigens recognized by spleen cells of C57B1/6 mice immunized with ultraviolet-irradiated cercariae. Int J Parasitol. 1994;24(7):943–950. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(94)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Coulson P.S., Wilson R.A. Recruitment of lymphocytes to the lung through vaccination enhances the immunity of mice exposed to irradiated schistosomes. Infect Immun. 1997;65(1):42–48. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.42-48.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Street M., Coulson P.S., Sadler C., Warnock L.J., McLaughlin D., Bluethmann H. TNF is essential for the cell-mediated protective immunity induced by the radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine. J Immunol. 1999;163(8):4489–4494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Coulson P.S., Smythies L.E., Betts C., Mabbott N.A., Sternberg J.M., Wei X.G. Nitric oxide produced in the lungs of mice immunized with the radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine is not the major agent causing challenge parasite elimination. Immunology. 1998;93(1):55–63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00405.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Anderson S., Coulson P.S., Ljubojevic S., Mountford A.P., Wilson R.A. The radiation-attenuated schistosome vaccine induces high levels of protective immunity in the absence of B cells. Immunology. 1999;96(1):22–28. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00661.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sher A., Hieny S., James S.L., Asofsky R. Mechanisms of protective immunity against Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae. II. Analysis of immunity in hosts deficient in T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, or complement. J Immunol. 1982;128(4):1880–1884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Mangold B.L., Dean D.A. Passive transfer with serum and IgG antibodies of irradiated cercaria-induced resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in mice. J Immunol. 1986;136(7):2644–2648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mangold B.L., Dean D.A. The role of IgG antibodies from irradiated cercaria-immunized rabbits in the passive transfer of immunity to Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;47(6):821–829. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jwo J., LoVerde P.T. The ability of fractionated sera from animals vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni to transfer immunity to mice. J Parasitol. 1989;75(2):252–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Dunne D.W., Jones F.M., Cook L., Moloney N.A. Passively transferable protection against Schistosoma japonicum induced in the mouse by multiple vaccination with attenuated larvae: the development of immunity, antibody isotype responses and antigen recognition. Parasite Immunol. 1994;16(12):655–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Soisson L.A., Reid G.D., Farah I.O., Nyindo M., Strand M. Protective immunity in baboons vaccinated with a recombinant antigen or radiation-attenuated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni is antibody-dependent. J Immunol. 1993;151(9):4782–4789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Vignali D.A., Devey M.E., Bickle Q.D., Taylor M.G. The role of antibody affinity and titre in immunity to Schistosoma mansoni following vaccination with highly irradiated cercariae. Immunology. 1990;69(2):195–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sher A., Coffman R.L., Hieny S., Cheever A.W. Ablation of eosinophil and IgE responses with anti-IL-5 or anti-IL-4 antibodies fails to affect immunity against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. J Immunol. 1990;145(11):3911–3916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wilson R.A., Coulson P.S., Betts C., Dowling M.A., Smythies L.E. Impaired immunity and altered pulmonary responses in mice with a disrupted interferon-gamma receptor gene exposed to the irradiated Schistosoma mansoni vaccine. Immunology. 1996;87(2):275–282. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.465550.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Wynn T.A., Oswald I.P., Eltoum I.A., Caspar P., Lowenstein C.J., Lewis F.A. Elevated expression of Th1 cytokines and nitric oxide synthase in the lungs of vaccinated mice after challenge infection with Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1994;153(11):5200–5209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.James S.L., Cheever A.W., Caspar P., Wynn T.A. Inducible nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice develop enhanced type 1 cytokine-associated cellular and humoral immune responses after vaccination with attenuated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae but display partially reduced resistance. Infect Immun. 1998;66(8):3510–3518. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.8.3510-3518.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ahmed S.F., Oswald I.P., Caspar P., Hieny S., Keefer L., Sher A. Developmental differences determine larval susceptibility to nitric oxide-mediated killing in a murine model of vaccination against Schistosoma mansoni. Infect Immun. 1997;65(1):219–226. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.219-226.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ascenzi P., Fasano M., Gradoni L. Do hemoglobin and hemocyanin impair schistosoma killing by no? IUBMB Life. 2002;53(6):287–288. doi: 10.1080/15216540213467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Oswald I.P., Caspar P., Wynn T.A., Scharton-Kersten T., Williams M.E., Hieny S. Failure of P strain mice to respond to vaccination against schistosomiasis correlates with impaired production of IL-12 and up-regulation of Th2 cytokines that inhibit macrophage activation. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28(6):1762–1772. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199806)28:06<1762::AID-IMMU1762>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Jankovic D., Wynn T.A., Kullberg M.C., Hieny S., Caspar P., James S. Optimal vaccination against Schistosoma mansoni requires the induction of both B cell- and IFN-gamma-dependent effector mechanisms. J Immunol. 1999;162(1):345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Mountford A.P., Hogg K.G., Coulson P.S., Brombacher F. Signaling via interleukin-4 receptor alpha chain is required for successful vaccination against schistosomiasis in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):228–236. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.228-236.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Anderson S., Shires V.L., Wilson R.A., Mountford A.P. In the absence of IL-12, the induction of Th1-mediated protective immunity by the attenuated schistosome vaccine is impaired, revealing an alternative pathway with Th2-type characteristics. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28(9):2827–2838. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199809)28:09<2827::AID-IMMU2827>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hoffmann K.F., James S.L., Cheever A.W., Wynn T.A. Studies with double cytokine-deficient mice reveal that highly polarized Th1- and Th2-type cytokine and antibody responses contribute equally to vaccine-induced immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1999;163(2):927–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wynn T.A., Hoffmann K.F. Defining a schistosomiasis vaccination strategy – is it really Th1 versus Th2? Parasitol Today. 2000;16(11):497–501. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(00)01788-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dalton J.P., Strand M., Mangold B.L., Dean D.A. Identification of Schistosoma mansoni glycoproteins recognized by protective antibodies from mice immunized with irradiated cercariae. J Immunol. 1986;136(12):4689–4694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Dalton J.P., Strand M. Schistosoma mansoni polypeptides immunogenic in mice vaccinated with radiation-attenuated cercariae. J Immunol. 1987;139(7):2474–2481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pearce E.J., James S.L., Dalton J., Barrall A., Ramos C., Strand M. Immunochemical characterization and purification of Sm-97, a Schistosoma mansoni antigen monospecifically recognized by antibodies from mice protectively immunized with a nonliving vaccine. J Immunol. 1986;137(11):3593–3600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Soisson L.M., Masterson C.P., Tom T.D., McNally M.T., Lowell G.H., Strand M. Induction of protective immunity in mice using a 62-kDa recombinant fragment of a Schistosoma mansoni surface antigen. J Immunol. 1992;149(11):3612–3620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hawn T.R., Tom T.D., Strand M. Molecular cloning and expression of SmIrV1, a Schistosoma mansoni antigen with similarity to calnexin, calreticulin, and OvRal1. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(11):7692–7698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Hawn T.R., Strand M. Developmentally regulated localization and phosphorylation of SmIrV1, a Schistosoma mansoni antigen with similarity to calnexin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(31):20083–20089. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dalton J.P., Tom T.D., Strand M. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a surface antigen of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula recognized by sera of vaccinated mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84(12):4268–4272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Köster B., Strand M. Schistosoma mansoni: Sm23 is a transmembrane protein that also contains a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol anchor. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;310(1):108–117. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Simpson A.J., Hackett F., Walker T., de Rossi R., Smithers S.R. Antibody response against schistosomulum surface antigens and protective immunity following immunization with highly irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol. 1985;7(2):133–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Omer Ali P., Hagan P., Hackett F., Smithers S.R., Simpson A.J. Variable species and stage specificity of schistosomulum surface epitopes recognized by mice vaccinated with highly irradiated cercariae. Parasite Immunol. 1989;11(3):257–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1989.tb00664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Richter D., Harn D.A. Candidate vaccine antigens identified by antibodies from mice vaccinated with 15- or 50-kilorad-irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Infect Immun. 1993;61(1):146–154. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.1.146-154.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Richter D., Reynolds S.R., Harn D.A. Candidate vaccine antigens that stimulate the cellular immune response of mice vaccinated with irradiated cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. 1993;151(1):256–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Richter D., Harn D.A., Matuschka F.R. The irradiated cercariae vaccine model: looking on the bright side of radiation. Parasitol Today. 1995;11(8):288–293. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.El Ridi R., Abdel Tawab N., Guirguis N. Schistosoma mansoni: identification and protective immunity of adult worm antigens recognized by T lymphocytes of outbred Swiss mice immunized with irradiated cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1993;76(3):265–277. doi: 10.1006/expr.1993.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Abdel Tawab N. Identification and molecular characterization of protective antigens against murine Schistosomiasis mansoni. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Cairo University; 1994. 280 p.
  • 139.El Gengehi N., El Ridi R., Tawab N.A., El Demellawy M., Mangold B.L. A Schistosoma mansoni 62-kDa band is identified as an irradiated vaccine T-cell antigen and characterized as calreticulin. J Parasitol. 2000;86(5):993–1000. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0993:ASMKBI]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bergquist N.R., Colley D.G. Schistosomiasis vaccine: research to development. Parasitol Today. 1998;14(3):99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(97)01207-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Todd C.W., Colley D.G. Practical and ethical issues in the development of a vaccine against schistosomiasis mansoni. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66(4):348–358. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Boulanger D., Reid G.D., Sturrock R.F., Wolowczuk I., Balloul J.M., Grezel D. Immunization of mice and baboons with the recombinant Sm28GST affects both worm viability and fecundity after experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasite Immunol. 1991;13(5):473–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1991.tb00545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Siddiqui A.A., Pinkston J.R., Quinlin M.L., Saeed Q., White G.L., Shearer M.H. Characterization of the immune response to DNA vaccination strategies for schistosomiasis candidate antigen, Sm-p80 in the baboon. Vaccine. 2005;23(12):1451–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ahmad G., Zhang W., Torben W., Damian R.T., Wolf R.F., White G.L. Protective and antifecundity effects of Sm-p80-based DNA vaccine formulation against Schistosoma mansoni in a nonhuman primate model. Vaccine. 2009;27(21):2830–2837. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Zhang W., Ahmad G., Torben W., Noor Z., Le L., Damian R.T. Sm-p80-based DNA vaccine provides baboons with levels of protection against Schistosoma mansoni infection comparable to those achieved by the irradiated cercarial vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(7):1105–1112. doi: 10.1086/651147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Torben W., Ahmad G., Zhang W., Siddiqui A.A. Role of antibodies in Sm-p80-mediated protection against Schistosoma mansoni challenge infection in murine and nonhuman primate models. Vaccine. 2011;29(12):2262–2271. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ahmad G., Zhang W., Torben W., Ahrorov A., Damian R.T., Wolf R.F. Preclinical prophylactic efficacy testing of Sm-p80-based vaccine in a nonhuman primate model of Schistosoma mansoni infection and immunoglobulin G and E responses to Sm-p80 in human serum samples from an area where schistosomiasis is endemic. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(9):1437–1449. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Karmakar S., Zhang W., Ahmad G., Torben W., Alam M.U., Le L. Cross-species protection: Schistosoma mansoni Sm-p80 vaccine confers protection against Schistosoma haematobium in hamsters and baboons. Vaccine. 2014;32(11):1296–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.El Ridi R, Tallima H. Solving the riddle of the lung-stage schistosomula paved the way to a novel remedy and an efficacious vaccine for schistosomiasis. In: Rashika El Ridi, editor. Parasitic diseases – Schistosomiasis. ISBN 978-953-51-0942-6 <http://www.intechopen.com/books/parasitic-diseases-schistosomiasis> [Published 2013-01-16. Book Chapter].
  • 150.Othman A., El Ridi R. Schistosomiasis. In: Brusch Fabrizio., editor. Helminth infections and their impact on global public health. Springer; 2014. pp. 49–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Krautz-Peterson G., Simoes M., Faghiri Z., Ndegwa D., Oliveira G., Shoemaker C.B. Suppressing glucose transporter gene expression in schistosomes impairs parasite feeding and decreases survival in the mammalian host. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(6):e1000932. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mahana NA. Human and murine immune responses to the Schistosoma mansoni glucose transporter, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Science, Cairo University; 2006. 240 p.
  • 153.Riveau G., Deplanque D., Remoué F., Schacht A.M., Vodougnon H., Capron M. Safety and immunogenicity of rSh28GST antigen in humans: phase 1 randomized clinical study of a vaccine candidate against urinary schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Jiz M., Wu H.W., Meng R., Pond-Tor S., Reynolds M., Friedman J.F. Pilot-scale production and characterization of paramyosin, a vaccine candidate for schistosomiasis japonica. Infect Immun. 2008;76(7):3164–3169. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00409-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Stephenson R., You H., McManus D.P., Toth I. Review: schistosome vaccine adjuvants in preclinical and clinical research. Vaccines. 2014;2(3):654–685. doi: 10.3390/vaccines2030654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.El Ridi R. More on the search for a schistosomiasis vaccine. Parasitol Today. 1998;14(10):436. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(98)01316-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Tallima H., Montash M., Veprek P., Velek J., Jezek J., El Ridi R. Differences in immunogenicity and vaccine potential of peptides from Schistosoma mansoni glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Vaccine. 2003;21(23):3290–3300. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00180-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.El Ridi R., Montash M., Tallima H. Immunogenicity and vaccine potential of dipeptidic multiple antigen peptides from Schistosoma mansoni glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Scand J Immunol. 2004;60(4):392–402. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Veprek P., Jezek J., Velek J., Tallima H., Montash M., El Ridi R. Peptides and multiple antigen peptides from Schistosoma mansoni glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase: preparation, immunogenicity and immunoprotective capacity in C57BL/6 mice. J Pept Sci. 2004;10(6):350–362. doi: 10.1002/psc.550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.El Ridi R., Tallima H. Schistosoma mansoni ex vivo lung-stage larvae excretory-secretory antigens as vaccine candidates against schistosomiasis. Vaccine. 2009;27(5):666–673. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.El Ridi R.A.F., Tallima H.A.-M. Novel therapeutic and prevention approaches for schistosomiasis. J Adv Res. 2013;4(5):467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.El Ridi R., Tallima H. Adjuvant selection for vaccination against murine schistosomiasis. Scand J Immunol. 2012;76(6):552–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Humphreys N.E., Xu D., Hepworth M.R., Liew F.Y., Grencis R.K. IL-33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2443–2449. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Monticelli L.A., Sonnenberg G.F., Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells: critical regulators of allergic inflammation and tissue repair in the lung. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(3):284–289. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Saenz S.A., Siracusa M.C., Monticelli L.A., Ziegler C.G., Kim B.S., Brestoff J.R. IL-25 simultaneously elicits distinct populations of innate lymphoid cells and multipotent progenitor type 2 (MPPtype2) cells. J Exp Med. 2013;210(9):1823–1837. doi: 10.1084/jem.20122332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Sokol C.L., Medzhitov R. Role of basophils in the initiation of Th2 responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22(1):73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Tang H., Cao W., Kasturi S.P., Ravindran R., Nakaya H.I., Kundu K. The T helper type 2 response to cysteine proteases requires dendritic cell-basophil cooperation via ROS-mediated signaling. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(7):608–617. doi: 10.1038/ni.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.El Ridi R., Tallima H. Vaccine-induced protection against murine schistosomiasis mansoni with larval excretory-secretory antigens and papain or type-2 cytokines. J Parasitol. 2013;99(2):194–202. doi: 10.1645/GE-3186.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.El Ridi R., Tallima H., Selim S., Donnelly S., Cotton S., Santana B. Gonzales. Cysteine peptidases as schistosomiasis vaccines with inbuilt adjuvanticity. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.El Ridi R., Tallima H., Dalton J.P., Donnelly S. Induction of protective immune responses against schistosomiasis using functionally active cysteine peptidases. Front Genet. 2014;5:119. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Tallima H, El Ridi R, Dalton JP. Induction of protective immune responses against schistosomiasis haematobium in hamsters and mice using cysteine peptidase-based vaccine. Front Immunol 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Advanced Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES