Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Aug 4;5:12826. doi: 10.1038/srep12826

Low-field Switching Four-state Nonvolatile Memory Based on Multiferroic Tunnel Junctions

H M Yau 1, Z B Yan 2, N Y Chan 1, K Au 1, C M Wong 1, C W Leung 1, FY Zhang 3, X S Gao 3, J Y Dai 1,a
PMCID: PMC4523833  PMID: 26239505

Abstract

Multiferroic tunneling junction based four-state non-volatile memories are very promising for future memory industry since this kind of memories hold the advantages of not only the higher density by scaling down memory cell but also the function of magnetically written and electrically reading. In this work, we demonstrate a success of this four-state memory in a material system of NiFe/BaTiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 with improved memory characteristics such as lower switching field and larger tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR). Ferroelectric switching induced resistive change memory with OFF/ON ratio of 16 and 0.3% TMR effect have been achieved in this multiferroic tunneling structure.

Resistance switching is one of the major mechanisms for non-volatile memories, and resistive switching memory based on metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structure has been extensively studied for more than a decade. In resistive switching process, with a high voltage applied, the insulating film can be made to be conductive through a filament conduction path which is usually formed by defects and metal migration inside the insulator or near the metal/insulator interface. However, resistive switching is still a destructive process because of the defect and distortion in the insulating layer after applying a sufficient high voltage. In order to improve the memory device performance, many memory structures are being studied according to the properties and features of materials. One of the hottest topics in this field nowadays is ferroelectric switching, from which the resistance switching can be obtained without forming any filament, and it has a much faster response time as well. The unique polarization switching in ferroelectrics has been found to affect electron transport properties significantly, and it has been demonstrated that such a tunnel junction can achieve giant electroresistive effect in which the resistance changes as high as 2–3 orders accompanied by a ferroelectric polarization switching1,2. This may lead to a sort of simple architecture of nonvolatile random access memory (RAM) that can overcome the storage density limitation of current devices. In addition, as the magnetic materials are used in the two conducting metal layers, a multiferroic tunnel junction can be realized, in which ferroelectric-ferromagnetic coupling and their interplay allow electrical control of magnetism or the extent of spin polarized electrons. This presents a way for a type of reversible, non-volatile, and potentially low-power four-state logic devices.

Aiming to fabricate a ferroelectric tunnel junction, an ultrathin ferroelectric layer is needed as a barrier for tunneling. Contreras et al. has experimentally investigated an ultrathin barrier in metal-ferroelectric-metal junction using Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 and obtained a switching effect with resistance OFF/ON ratio close to 4 due to a pure ferroelectric polarization3. Maksymovych et al.4 demonstrated a highly reproducible control of electric transport by spontaneous polarization of a ferroelectric oxide Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3, where the hysteretic tunneling current coincides with ferroelectric polarization. Many researches1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10 have provided evidence for the correlation between the ferroelectric polarization switching and resistance switching.

In this work, BaTiO3 (BTO) is used as the ultrathin ferroelectric barrier sandwiched by two electrodes composed of different magnetic materials La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) and Permalloy Ni0.81Fe0.19 (NiFe), which are chosen as bottom and top electrode respectively. As a half-metallic ferromagnet, the Curie temperature of LSMO is higher than room temperature, and in particular its spin polarization is close to 100%11. On the other hand, NiFe is chosen as the top electrode because it is a well-known alloy that allows strong spin electron injection at room temperature, and has relatively much lower coercive field, which makes it able to form a low switching field spin valve structure.

Results and Discussion

A 5nm-thick BTO ultrathin film was deposited epitaxially on 60-nm thick LSMO film which is confirmed as metallic behavior acting as bottom electrode with a good performance of transport properties (Supplementary Figure S1). Figure 1(a) shows a low-magnification cross-sectional TEM image of the NiFe/BTO/LSMO film on STO substrate, where a continuous layer of about 5 nm BTO can be clearly seen and the epitaxial growth of BTO on LSMO with sharp interface can be confirmed (also illustrated by selected area electron diffraction in Fig. 1(b)). High-resolution TEM image of the BTO film on LSMO layer, as shown in Fig. 1(c), reveals the excellent epitaxial growth of BTO on LSMO; the continuity growth of BTO on LSMO makes their interface hard to be distinguished as can be seen in the noise-reduced image as shown in Fig. 1 (d). Since the BTO has relatively larger lattice constants (a = 3.992 Å, c = 4.036 Å) compared to that of LSMO and STO, such a stacking structure can also ensure that the BTO is under a compressive stress with c-axis along the film normal direction. This is very important for ferroelectric switching memory application12.

Figure 1. Structure of NiFe/BTO/LSMO/STO heterostructure:

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Low magnification TEM cross-section image of 5 nm-BTO on LSMO grown on STO substrate; (b) the corresponding electron diffraction pattern including the STO substrate and BTO/LSMO layers; (c) High-resolution TEM image of the NiFe/BTO/LSMO observed along [100] direction; and (d) a noise-reduced image from (c).

To prove the ferroelectric property of the ultrathin BTO film, which is essential for this multiferroic tunneling junction, piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) was used to demonstrate BTO’s ferroelectric switching. Figure 2(a) are the butterfly loop amplitude and phase curves of the device, where one can see that the butterfly loop is asymmetric, and we believe that it should be caused by the different work functions of LSMO and NiFe. The out-of-plane PFM amplitude and phase images are shown in Fig. 2(c) recorded as a ferroelectric domain structure written on the BTO surface with ± 2.5 V. The 180° phase contrast reveals the domain structure showing two antiparallel polarizations written by poling voltage. Electrons accumulation and depletion at the interface of BTO and LSMO based on the explanation from Wen et al.13 may also occur in this structure. Due to the electron screening effect, different directions of polarization may change the band diagram and thus widen the tunneling barrier as well as the coercive voltage in different polarity.

Figure 2. Ferroelectricity of BTO Ultrathin film.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) and (b) butterfly loop amplitude and phase curves of the 5 nm-BTO film; PFM out-of-plane amplitude (c) and phase (d) images recorded after writing an area of 1 μm x 1 μm with −2.5 V and then the central square with +2.5 V using a biased conductive tip.

Resistance-voltage curves showing non-volatile resistance switching is demonstrated in Fig. 3, and the schematic diagram of the multiferroic tunneling junction is shown in the inset of the figure. During the measurements, pulse train writing voltages were used in the sequence of 0V→1.5 V→0V→–1.5 V→0 V with a step of 0.2 V, and the reading voltage remained unchanged as Vread = 0.1 V. At 40 K, this device exhibits a characteristic of bipolar resistive switching with an electroresistance OFF/ON ratio of 14. For this device, no electroforming at higher voltage is needed before the observation of hysteretic resistance-changes. A positive pulse of voltage drives the BTO polarization to point to NiFe which sets the device to low resistance state LRS (the top electrode is grounded and the voltage is applied on the bottom LSMO electrode). While to set the device to high resistance state HRS, a negative voltage pulse drives the polarization to the opposite. It should be noticed that at room temperature, there is only an extremely small OFF/ON ratio, i.e. the resistance-voltage (R-V) curve measured at room temperature is not significant enough compared with that measured at 40K. The reason that the low temperature measurement shows much larger OFF/ON ratio is due to the suppress of leakage current at low temperature; while at room temperature oxygen vacancy and other defect induced leakage current overrides the ferroelectric switching induced resistive switching (Supplementary Figure S2 and S3). Moreover, by taking account of the temperature-dependent resistance of LSMO, resistance of the bottom electrode exponentially decreases in lower temperatures. From Fig. 3, it can also be seen that after ten cycles, the resistance shows identical loops, indicating a good reproducibility of the device performance. Also, the HRS and LRS are stable and flatten unless it reaches the coercive voltage, which shows the stability of the device.

Figure 3. Stability of OFF/ON electroresistance change in the devices.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Resistance-voltage curves obtained at 40 K for 10 cycles shows a stable performance of the device.

Figure 4(a) shows the resistance changes with different writing voltages at low temperature (40 K), where it can be seen that the device shows uniform performance. The R-V curves record the junction resistance measured at Vread = 0.1 V with varying maximum Vwrite. One can see that at the negative voltage side, the coercive voltages for different writing voltage are the same, while they are different at the positive side. This is consistent with asymmetric butterfly loop shown in Fig. 2. This result is similar to André Chanthbouala’s work14, and the reason for this phenomenon is due to the fact that a larger writing voltage makes the polarization switching more complete, and therefore, the resistance shows larger OFF/ON ratio. This can be demonstrated in the Fig. 4(b), where it is apparent that the relatively lower voltages below 2.5 V result in partially switched domain structure. For Fig. 4(b), the change of upward and downward polarization in BTO film can also determine the tunneling electro-resistance effect (TER)15. Domain can be switched only when a tip is biased with a voltage that exceeds the coercive voltage for this film from the result of PFM butterfly loop. This suggests polarization switching of this ferroelectric is present during the switching. Also, conductance of HRS and LRS for our device is fitted by Brinkman’s model16 and Simmons’ model17 (Supplementary Figure S4 and S5) which also illustrates the TER effect in our FTJ device in low temperature. To explain the variation of OFF state resistance, BTO/LSMO interface screening effect1,18 should be considered. Besides the increase of barrier height when polarization is downwards pointing to the LSMO, the tunneling transmittance also reduced. Tsymbal et al.19 and Wen et al.20 have mentioned that accumulation and depletion of the majority carriers would occur at the semiconductor interface in the OFF state, and thus, an extra barrier against the tunneling electrons appears in the depletion region near to LSMO surface. By increasing the maximum voltage, the width of the depleted space charge region increases, and therefore, the curves with different Vmax do not coincide in the OFF state.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a)Resistance hysteresis loops of FTJ measured at 40 K using the pulse voltage to write and changing with the maximum voltage increasing from 1.0 to 2.5 V were applied. Read pulses of 0.1 V were applied after each write pulse. The corresponding domain evolution is shown schematically in the bottom-right and top-left insets for the ON and OFF states, respectively. (b) PFM phase images of BTO areas switched with the voltage used in the measurement. Relative fraction of switching domains show states achieved by the application of positive (and negative) voltage pulses of increasing amplitude.

After determining the electrical transport properties of our ferroelectric tunnel junction, magnetic properties of the LSMO and NiFe electrodes were examined. In spite of the model of Dieny et al.21, a modern spin valve structure of our device is made of two dissimilar ferromagnetic materials, LSMO and Ni0.81Fe0.19, as the electrodes. Because of two different coercive fields, soft magnetic material and hard magnetic material can be categorized and used for a pseudo spin valve due to the parallel and antiparallel configuration of magnetic properties. When the electrodes are ferromagnetic, electrons tunnel across the insulating barrier are spin-polarized, and this polarization reflects the density of states at the Fermi level of the electrodes. This spin polarization is the origin of the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR). Several groups of researchers have reported about the further development of ferromagnetic devices – tunnel magnetoresistance22,23,24,25,26. To obtain the ratio of TMR, tunnel magnetoresistance can be expressed in equation (1) by using Julliere model27:

graphic file with name srep12826-m1.jpg

Where Roff is the resistance in antiparallel magnetization state, Ron is that in parallel magnetization state, PLSMO and PNiFe are the spin polarizations of the two electrodes. According to the above theory, when two ferromagnetic electrodes sandwiched with a thin layer of insulating material, a magnetic tunnel junction can be made. In our expectation, LSMO which had been tested as almost 100% positive spin-polarization and most of the ferromagnetic metals such as Co and Ni are negative28,29, so it can be assumed that our results of TMR would be negative.

To aim at TMR, double hysteresis loops should be obtained in two dissimilar electrodes. According to the moment-field loop of NiFe and LSMO obtained by VSM shown in Fig. 5, at low temperature (8 K), the coercive field of LSMO is 20 Oe, and it is 5.0 Oe for NiFe in the direction of parallel to film plane. By comparing with these two magnetic materials, the NiFe electrode should act as a soft magnet while the LSMO layer should act as a hard magnet. This result suggests that the so-called four-state memory function can be realized by coupling and interplay between the magnetic and ferroelectric polarizations at this multiferroic tunneling structure. The magnetization direction dependent-resistance for this tunneling junction can be explained by tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) which is about spin-polarized tunneling that involves alignment of magnetic moments of the two magnetic electrode layers22,29. According to Kouacou’s research in 200830, LSMO/STO(001) has an easy magnetization direction with [110] as the easy-axis while along the perpendicular axis, the saturation field is much higher (the saturation field μ0Hsat is found to be 7,000G at 285 K and 14,000G at 10 K), so there is no noticeable change in resistance because of the relatively much weaker magnetic field applied. Therefore, the loop is analogous to that measured without applying a magnetic field. However, when the magnetic field is parallel to the film plane, the relative magnetization directions of the two ferromagnetic layers are easily aligned in parallel due to the direction of easy axis, and therefore, very clear TMR effect can be observed.

Figure 5. Magnetism of NiFe and LSMO.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Hysteresis loop of NiFe and LSMO (at 8 K temperature).

The four-state non-volatile memory characteristic of this multiferroic tunnel junction was further demonstrated by the magnetic and electrical switching measurement29,31,32,33,34. During measurement, a device of NiFe/BTO/LSMO was placed in the middle of two current-controlled electromagnets with the magnetic field parallel to the film direction aiming to magnetize the NiFe and LSMO electrodes to the same direction. By poling the ferroelectric barrier upwards and downwards, then switching magnetic field from 100 Oe to −100 Oe and returning to 100 Oe, the resistance measurement results were obtained as squares and triangles respectively as shown in Fig. 6. In the case where the magnetic moments of both NiFe and LSMO are in parallel, when the magnetic field changes from 100 Oe to −5 Oe, the resistance remains unchanged. When the field is over −5.0 Oe, soft magnet NiFe starts to switch. Thus, resistance change is obvious due to anti-parallel alignment of magnetic moment between NiFe and LSMO. From Fig. 6, two facts about this multiferroic junction memory can be seen. The first fact is that, under the two different ferroelectric polarizations of BTO and the two different ferromagnetic polarizations of NiFe and LSMO, there are four resistance states across the junction. With the up and down ferroelectric polarizations, the relative resistance changes of the spin valve for the parallel (ON state) and anti-parallel (OFF state) magnetizations are 500 Ω and 15 Ω, respectively; i.e., the resistance change due to the TMR effect is +0.3% to −0.15%. While when the spin valve is in the ON state (LSMO and NiFe are in the parallel magnetization), the ratio of the two resistance states for the different ferroelectric polarizations is 16. As a consequence, with the combination of ferroelectric switching and small-coercive field switching magnetic tunnel junction, four resistance states are obtained with less energy consumption. It is worth noting that the low TMR-ratio measured by others groups may be due to two possible reasons, i.e. the formation of dead layer in the polar-discontinuity model35,36 or the electrodes not actually being spin-polarized as expected37,38.

Figure 6. Resistance changes with different magnetic field at low temperature (8 K).

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

It shows four-state memory tested on the NiFe/BTO/LSMO structure.

Another fact is that during the 200 cycles test (called the endurance test), the resistances (read with 0.1 V) for the four different states are relatively stable, indicating the good endurance proprieties. The increase of resistance when increasing the number of cycles may be due to the heat dissipation causing overall temperature increase throughout the experiment due to the metallic behavior of LSMO.

In conclusion, multiferroic tunneling junction based on NiFe/BTO/LSMO has been grown by laser-MBE technique. Ferroelectric switching induced resistive change memory with OFF/ON ratio of 16 and 0.3% TMR effect have been achieved in this tunneling structure. Relatively much lower magnetic switching field less than 100 Oe and four-state memory characteristics have been demonstrated with very good endurance for such structure. These results are promising for high-density low-power consumption non-volatile memory. Further work is needed to make this memory structure workable at room temperature with miniature memory cells in a cross bar device.

Methods

Sample preparation

BTO/LSMO bilayers were grown by laser-molecular beam epitaxy (Laser-MBE) on (001) SrTiO3 (STO) single crystal substrates using a KrF excimer laser (λ = 248 nm), with a flunece of 200 mJ. This substrate was chosen to induce a large compressive strain in ultrathin films of BTO, which enhances the ferroelectric polarization13,14,39. Before deposition, the base pressure in the chamber is under a high vacuum in about 2.0 × 10−5Pa in order to reduce residential gas. A 60 nm-thick LSMO film was grown at a deposition temperature of 730 °C, an oxygen pressure of 15Pa and the laser pulse repetition rate is 2 Hz. Then about 5 nm-thick BTO film was grown under an oxygen pressure of 10Pa at 700 °C with a repetition of 1 Hz. After deposition, the sample was in-situ annealed at 700 °C under a high oxygen pressure of 0.1 atm (10 kPa) for 1 hour to reduce oxygen vacancies in the oxide films. Then, the sample was cooled down to room temperature in the same ambient.

Sample characterization

The microstructure of the BTO/LSMO/STO was characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (JEM 2100F). Piezoresponse Force Microscopy was performed using Pt/Ti-coated silicon cantilevers to obtain the phase and amplitude images to evaluate the ferroelectric property of BTO. For transportation measurement, top electrodes of the size of 100 μm in diameter were defined by photolithography and lift-off of NiFe layers, which was grown by magnetron sputtering at room temperature and covered by a layer of gold to prevent oxidation. A layer of sputter-deposited Au is in contact with LSMO to overcome the Schottky junction. The junction memory cells were contacted by Aluminum wire and E-solder for measuring transport properties. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics and resistance switching properties were measured by using a Keithley 6517a source meter and magnetic properties are introduced by using VSM.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yau, H. M. et al. Low-field Switching Four-state Nonvolatile Memory Based on Multiferroic Tunnel Junctions. Sci. Rep. 5, 12826; doi: 10.1038/srep12826 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep12826-s1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the financial support from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (No. PolyU 514512) and financial support of stretigic plan (1-ZVCG) and internal grant of G-YN42, G-Y169.

Footnotes

Author Contributions H.M.Y. and K.A. prepared the samples; H.M.Y. and C.M.W. carried out the measurements; J.Y.D. directed the project and provided advice on the electrical properties measuring experiments with Z.B.Y. and N.Y.C.; C.W.L. commented magnetic properties measuring experiments; F.Y.Z. and X.S.G. performed the PFM measurement; H.M.Y. and J.Y.D. participated in discussing the data and writing the manuscript.

References

  1. Zhuravlev M., Sabirianov R., Jaswal S. & Tsymbal E. Giant Electroresistance in Ferroelectric Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 246802 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  2. Garcia V. et al. Giant tunnel electroresistance for non-destructive readout of ferroelectric states. Nature 460, 81–4 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rodriguez Contreras J. et al. Resistive switching in metal-ferroelectric-metal junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4595–4597 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  4. Maksymovych P. et al. Polarization control of electron tunneling into ferroelectric surfaces. Science 324, 1421–5 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tybell T., Ahn C. H. & Triscone J.-M. Ferroelectricity in thin perovskite films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 856–858 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  6. Junquera J. & Ghosez P. Critical thickness for ferroelectricity in perovskite ultrathin films. Nature 422, 506–509 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tsymbal E. Y. & Kohlstedt H. Applied physics. Tunneling across a ferroelectric. Science 313, 181–183 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Valencia S. et al. Interface-induced room-temperature multiferroicity in BaTiO3. Nat. Mater. 10, 753–8 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia V. & Bibes M. Inside story of ferroelectric memories. Nature 483, 279–281 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garcia V. & Bibes M. Ferroelectric tunnel junctions for information storage and processing. Nat. Commun. 5, 4289 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowen M. et al. Nearly total spin polarization in La[sub 2/3]Sr[sub 1/3]MnO[sub 3] from tunneling experiments. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 233 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang G.-F. & Berger S. Combined effect of thickness and stress on ferroelectric behavior of thin BaTiO[sub 3] films. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2855 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  13. Wen Z., Li C., Wu D., Li A. & Ming N. Ferroelectric-field-effect-enhanced electroresistance in metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 12, 617–21 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chanthbouala A. et al. A ferroelectric memristor. Nat. Mater. 11, 860–4 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gruverman a. et al. Tunneling electroresistance effect in ferroelectric tunnel junctions at the nanoscale. Nano Lett. 9, 3539–3543 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brinkman W. F. Tunneling Conductance of Asymmetrical Barriers. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1915 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  17. Simmons J. Poole-Frenkel Effect and Schottky Effect in Metal-Insulator-Metal Systems. Phys. Rev. 155, 657–660 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu H. et al. Electric modulation of magnetization at the BaTiO3/La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 232904 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsymbal E. Y. & Gruverman A. Beyond the barrier. Nat. Mater. 12, 12–14 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wen Z., Wu D. & Li A. Memristive behaviors in Pt/BaTiO3/Nb:SrTiO3 ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 052910 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Dieny B. et al. Giant magnetoresistive in soft ferromagnetic multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 43, 1297–1300 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. De Teresa J. et al. Inverse Tunnel Magnetoresistance in Co/SrTiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3: New Ideas on Spin-Polarized Tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4288–4291 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuasa S., Nagahama T., Fukushima A., Suzuki Y. & Ando K. Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 3, 868–71 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yuasa S., Fukushima A., Nagahama T., Ando K. & Suzuki Y. High Tunnel Magnetoresistance at Room Temperature in Fully Epitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe Tunnel Junctions due to Coherent Spin-Polarized Tunneling. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, L588–L590 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang X., Li B.-Z., Sun G. & Pu F.-C. Spin-polarized tunneling and magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/insulator(semiconductor) single and double tunnel junctions subjected to an electric field. Phys. Rev. B 56, 5484–5488 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  26. Faure-Vincent J. et al. High tunnel magnetoresistance in epitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4507 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  27. Julliere M. Tunneling Between Ferromagnetic Films. Phys. Lett. A 54, 225–226 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  28. Velev J. P. et al. Negative spin polarization and large tunneling magnetoresistance in epitaxial Co|SrTiO3|Co magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schebaum O., Fabretti S., Moodera J. S. & Thomas A. Spin-polarized tunneling in MgO-based tunnel junctions with superconducting electrodes. New J. Phys. 14, 033023 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kouacou M. A. et al. Magnetic and Transport Properties of Half-Metallic Ferromagnetic Compounds as the La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 Epitaxial Manganite Oxide Thin Films. J. Appl. Sci. 8, 4624–4630 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu Y. K. et al. Coexistence of four resistance states and exchange bias in La0.6Sr0.4MnO3/BiFeO3/La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 multiferroic tunnel junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 043507 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. Yin Y. W. et al. Enhanced tunnelling electroresistance effect due to a ferroelectrically induced phase transition at a magnetic complex oxide interface. Nat. Mater. 12, 397–402 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yin Y. W. et al. Coexistence of tunneling magnetoresistance and electroresistance at room temperature in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/(Ba, Sr)TiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 multiferroic tunnel junctions. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 07D915 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  34. Garcia V. et al. Ferroelectric control of spin polarization. Science 327, 1106–10 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Borges R. P., Guichard W., Lunney J. G., Coey J. M. D. & Ott F. Magnetic and electric ‘dead’ layers in (La0.7Sr0.3)MnO3 thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 3868 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  36. Kavich J. et al. Nanoscale suppression of magnetization at atomically assembled manganite interfaces: XMCD and XRMS measurements. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014410 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  37. Fadil D. et al. Direct observation of magnetization reversal and low field magnetoresistance of epitaxial La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrTiO3 (001) thin films at room temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 013906 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  38. Freeland J. W. et al. Suppressed magnetization at the surfaces and interfaces of ferromagnetic metallic manganites. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 315210 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Chanthbouala A. et al. Solid-state memories based on ferroelectric tunnel junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 101–4 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep12826-s1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES