Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia logoLink to Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
letter
. 2015 Jul;59(7):458–459. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.160974

Commentary: Minimising intraoperative exposure of ionising radiation to anaesthesiologists

R S Raghavendra Rao 1
PMCID: PMC4523977  PMID: 26257429

The anaesthesiologists and radiologists constitute the high-risk personnel getting exposure to radiation during diagnostic and therapeutic radiological procedures.[1] It has become the need of the hour for the anaesthesia providers to be in close contact with the patient both inside and outside the operative room.

The unit of radiation is known as grey (Gy) (1 Gy = 100 rad) and when absorbed that dose is termed as Sievert (Sv). The dose limit for the exposure stays in the range of 150Sv-500Sv/year.[2] Multiplying and metabolically active cells are most sensitive to radiation hazards. The exposure hazards range from the simplest skin injury and cataract to the most lethal hazard, malignancy.[3] The harmful effect of radiation is more pronounced in pregnant women when the exposure is continuous, and more intense with dose greater than 0.5 Gy.[4]

Monitoring at the thyroid collar, inside and outside the protective gear of lead apron is advisable for all staff.[5] The education and awareness about the risk involved, care that needs to be exercised are to be highlighted to all the susceptible health care personnel. The infrastructure plan and safe positions so as to minimise the effects are to be understood.[6] The basic principle of prevention such as limiting the time of exposure keeping a safe distance and use of proper protective shield should be strictly adhered to.[7] Since the radiation beam is most often directed perpendicularly, the anaesthesiologists when standing at head end of the patient, may receive lesser dose of radiation. Hence proper positioning of anaesthesiologist is essential to minimize the risk of radiation. Anaesthesia workstation could be used as an additional shield by rotating it to 180° such that the back of the equipment is facing the operative field thus giving the anaesthesiologist an additional cover.[8]

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berry AJ, Katz JD. Occupational health. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. pp. 57–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological effects of radiation. Reactor Concepts Manual Part 2. Ch. 9. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Technical Training Centre. [Last accessed on 2012 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0230/ML023020586.pdf .
  • 3.Phillips G, Monaghan WP. Radiation safety for anesthesia providers. AANA J. 2011;79:257–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kambarami T. Radiation safety. Anaesthesia refresher course: Part 1. 2014;17:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological effects of radiation. Reactor Concepts Manual Part 2. Ch. 9. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Technical Training Centre. [Last accessed on 2012 Mar 11]. Available from: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0230/ML023020586.pdf .
  • 6.International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taylor J, Chandramohan M, Simpson KH. Radiation safety for anaesthetists. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2012. [Last accessed on 2015 Jun 16]. Available from: http://ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/11/04/bjaceaccp.mks055.full.pdf+html .
  • 8.Marcus A. Glowing risk: Anaesthesiologists exposure to radiation on the job. Anesthesiol News. 2009;35:10. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES