Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1996 Nov 15;15(22):6290–6300.

Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells.

M P Kladde 1, M Xu 1, R T Simpson 1
PMCID: PMC452452  PMID: 8947052

Abstract

Current methods for analysis of chromatin architecture are invasive, utilizing chemicals or nucleases that damage DNA, making detection of labile constituents and conclusions about true in vivo structure problematic. We describe a sensitive assay of chromatin structure which is performed in intact, living yeast. The approach utilizes expression of SssI DNA methyltransferase (MTase) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to provide an order-of-magnitude increase in resolution over previously introduced MTases. Combining this resolution increase with the novel application of a PCR-based, positive chemical display of modified cytosines provides a significant advance in the direct study of DNA-protein interactions in growing cells that enables quantitative footprinting. The validity and efficacy of the strategy are demonstrated in mini-chromosomes, where positioned nucleosomes and a labile, operator-bound repressor are detected. Also, using a heterologous system to study gene activation, we show that in vivo hormone occupancy of the estrogen receptor is required for maximal site-specific DNA binding, whereas, at very high receptor-expression levels, hormone-independent partial occupancy of an estrogen-responsive element was observed. Receptor binding to a palindromic estrogen-responsive element leads to a footprint with strand-specific asymmetry, which is explicable by known structural information.

Full text

PDF
6290

Images in this article

6291Image
on p.6291
6293Image
on p.6293
6295Image
on p.6295

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker P. B., Ruppert S., Schütz G. Genomic footprinting reveals cell type-specific DNA binding of ubiquitous factors. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):435–443. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90639-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breslauer K. J., Frank R., Blöcker H., Marky L. A. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3746–3750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson M., Laurent B. C. The SNF/SWI family of global transcriptional activators. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;6(3):396–402. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J., Ding M., Pederson D. S. Binding of TFIID to the CYC1 TATA boxes in yeast occurs independently of upstream activating sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):11909–11913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.11909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chou Q., Russell M., Birch D. E., Raymond J., Bloch W. Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Apr 11;20(7):1717–1723. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.7.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christianson T. W., Sikorski R. S., Dante M., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene. 1992 Jan 2;110(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90454-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark S. J., Harrison J., Paul C. L., Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 11;22(15):2990–2997. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.2990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper J. P., Roth S. Y., Simpson R. T. The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 15;8(12):1400–1410. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.12.1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drew H. R., McCall M. J. Structural analysis of a reconstituted DNA containing three histone octamers and histone H5. J Mol Biol. 1987 Oct 5;197(3):485–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90560-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fehér Z., Kiss A., Venetianer P. Expression of a bacterial modification methylase gene in yeast. Nature. 1983 Mar 17;302(5905):266–268. doi: 10.1038/302266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher-Adams G., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the GAL1 promoter. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1468–1477. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frommer M., McDonald L. E., Millar D. S., Collis C. M., Watt F., Grigg G. W., Molloy P. L., Paul C. L. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 1;89(5):1827–1831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furlow J. D., Murdoch F. E., Gorski J. High affinity binding of the estrogen receptor to a DNA response element does not require homodimer formation or estrogen. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15;268(17):12519–12525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilbert D. M., Heery D. M., Losson R., Chambon P., Lemoine Y. Estradiol-inducible squelching and cell growth arrest by a chimeric VP16-estrogen receptor expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: suppression by an allele of PDR1. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;13(1):462–472. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilbert D. M., Losson R., Chambon P. Ligand dependence of estrogen receptor induced changes in chromatin structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 11;20(17):4525–4531. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gottschling D. E. Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4062–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Han M., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayatsu H. Bisulfite modification of nucleic acids and their constituents. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1976;16:75–124. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60756-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Higuchi R., Krummel B., Saiki R. K. A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 11;16(15):7351–7367. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.15.7351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill J., Donald K. A., Griffiths D. E., Donald G. DMSO-enhanced whole cell yeast transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 25;19(20):5791–5791. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hochstrasser M., Ellison M. J., Chau V., Varshavsky A. The short-lived MAT alpha 2 transcriptional regulator is ubiquitinated in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4606–4610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoekstra M. F., Malone R. E. Expression of the Escherichia coli dam methylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of in vivo adenine methylation on genetic recombination and mutation. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;5(4):610–618. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.4.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. King W. J., Greene G. L. Monoclonal antibodies localize oestrogen receptor in the nuclei of target cells. Nature. 1984 Feb 23;307(5953):745–747. doi: 10.1038/307745a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kladde M. P., Simpson R. T. Positioned nucleosomes inhibit Dam methylation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 15;91(4):1361–1365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klimasauskas S., Kumar S., Roberts R. J., Cheng X. HhaI methyltransferase flips its target base out of the DNA helix. Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90342-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klinge C. M., Peale F. V., Jr, Hilf R., Bambara R. A., Zain S. Cooperative estrogen receptor interaction with consensus or variant estrogen responsive elements in vitro. Cancer Res. 1992 Mar 1;52(5):1073–1081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klock G., Strähle U., Schütz G. Oestrogen and glucocorticoid responsive elements are closely related but distinct. Nature. 1987 Oct 22;329(6141):734–736. doi: 10.1038/329734a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar V., Chambon P. The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):145–156. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee K. P., Baxter H. J., Guillemette J. G., Lawford H. G., Lewis P. N. Structural studies on yeast nucleosomes. Can J Biochem. 1982 Mar;60(3):379–388. doi: 10.1139/o82-045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maurer R. A., Notides A. C. Identification of an estrogen-responsive element from the 5'-flanking region of the rat prolactin gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;7(12):4247–4254. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.12.4247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonnell D. P., Nawaz Z., O'Malley B. W. In situ distinction between steroid receptor binding and transactivation at a target gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4350–4355. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McGhee J. D., Felsenfeld G. Reaction of nucleosome DNA with dimethyl sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2133–2137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Metzger D., Berry M., Ali S., Chambon P. Effect of antagonists on DNA binding properties of the human estrogen receptor in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol. 1995 May;9(5):579–591. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.5.7565805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Metzger D., Losson R., Bornert J. M., Lemoine Y., Chambon P. Promoter specificity of the two transcriptional activation functions of the human oestrogen receptor in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jun 11;20(11):2813–2817. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.11.2813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Metzger D., White J. H., Chambon P. The human oestrogen receptor functions in yeast. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):31–36. doi: 10.1038/334031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Morse R. H., Pederson D. S., Dean A., Simpson R. T. Yeast nucleosomes allow thermal untwisting of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Dec 23;15(24):10311–10330. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.24.10311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Murdoch F. E., Meier D. A., Furlow J. D., Grunwald K. A., Gorski J. Estrogen receptor binding to a DNA response element in vitro is not dependent upon estradiol. Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 11;29(36):8377–8385. doi: 10.1021/bi00488a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Murphy M. R., Shimizu M., Roth S. Y., Dranginis A. M., Simpson R. T. DNA-protein interactions at the S.cerevisiae alpha 2 operator in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 11;21(14):3295–3300. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.14.3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nardulli A. M., Grobner C., Cotter D. Estrogen receptor-induced DNA bending: orientation of the bend and replacement of an estrogen response element with an intrinsic DNA bending sequence. Mol Endocrinol. 1995 Aug;9(8):1064–1076. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.8.7476980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nightingale K., Wolffe A. P. Methylation at CpG sequences does not influence histone H1 binding to a nucleosome including a Xenopus borealis 5 S rRNA gene. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 3;270(9):4197–4200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Patterton H. G., Simpson R. T. Nucleosomal location of the STE6 TATA box and Mat alpha 2p-mediated repression. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;14(6):4002–4010. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peterson C. L., Tamkun J. W. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Apr;20(4):143–146. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88990-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pham T. A., Elliston J. F., Nawaz Z., McDonnell D. P., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Antiestrogen can establish nonproductive receptor complexes and alter chromatin structure at target enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3125–3129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pham T. A., Hwung Y. P., McDonnell D. P., O'Malley B. W. Transactivation functions facilitate the disruption of chromatin structure by estrogen receptor derivatives in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 25;266(27):18179–18187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pham T. A., Hwung Y. P., Santiso-Mere D., McDonnell D. P., O'Malley B. W. Ligand-dependent and -independent function of the transactivation regions of the human estrogen receptor in yeast. Mol Endocrinol. 1992 Jul;6(7):1043–1050. doi: 10.1210/mend.6.7.1508220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Philipsen J. N., Hennis B. C., Ab G. In vivo footprinting of the estrogen-inducible vitellogenin II gene from chicken. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9663–9676. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Reese J. C., Katzenellenbogen B. S. Examination of the DNA-binding ability of estrogen receptor in whole cells: implications for hormone-independent transactivation and the actions of antiestrogens. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4531–4538. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Reinisch K. M., Chen L., Verdine G. L., Lipscomb W. N. The crystal structure of HaeIII methyltransferase convalently complexed to DNA: an extrahelical cytosine and rearranged base pairing. Cell. 1995 Jul 14;82(1):143–153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Renbaum P., Abrahamove D., Fainsod A., Wilson G. G., Rottem S., Razin A. Cloning, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of the gene coding for the CpG DNA methylase from Spiroplasma sp. strain MQ1(M.SssI). Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Mar 11;18(5):1145–1152. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.5.1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Renbaum P., Razin A. Footprint analysis of M.Sssl and M.Hhal methyltransferases reveals extensive interactions with the substrate DNA backbone. J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 21;248(1):19–26. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rigaud G., Roux J., Pictet R., Grange T. In vivo footprinting of rat TAT gene: dynamic interplay between the glucocorticoid receptor and a liver-specific factor. Cell. 1991 Nov 29;67(5):977–986. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90370-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Roca J., Gartenberg M. R., Oshima Y., Wang J. C. A hit-and-run system for targeted genetic manipulations in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 11;20(17):4671–4672. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Roth S. Y., Dean A., Simpson R. T. Yeast alpha 2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2247–2260. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Roth S. Y., Shimizu M., Johnson L., Grunstein M., Simpson R. T. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast alpha 2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev. 1992 Mar;6(3):411–425. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.3.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schwabe J. W., Chapman L., Finch J. T., Rhodes D. The crystal structure of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain bound to DNA: how receptors discriminate between their response elements. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):567–578. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90390-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shimizu M., Roth S. Y., Szent-Gyorgyi C., Simpson R. T. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the alpha 2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3033–3041. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Simpson R. T. Mechanism of a reversible, thermally induced conformational change in chromatin core particles. J Biol Chem. 1979 Oct 25;254(20):10123–10127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Simpson R. T. Nucleosome positioning can affect the function of a cis-acting DNA element in vivo. Nature. 1990 Jan 25;343(6256):387–389. doi: 10.1038/343387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Simpson R. T. Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1991;40:143–184. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60841-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Singh J., Klar A. J. Active genes in budding yeast display enhanced in vivo accessibility to foreign DNA methylases: a novel in vivo probe for chromatin structure of yeast. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):186–196. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Szent-Gyorgyi C. A bipartite operator interacts with a heat shock element to mediate early meiotic induction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP82. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;15(12):6754–6769. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.6754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vettese-Dadey M., Walter P., Chen H., Juan L. J., Workman J. L. Role of the histone amino termini in facilitated binding of a transcription factor, GAL4-AH, to nucleosome cores. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):970–981. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Weischet W. O., Tatchell K., Van Holde K. E., Klump H. Thermal denaturation of nucleosomal core particles. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jan;5(1):139–160. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Welshons W. V., Lieberman M. E., Gorski J. Nuclear localization of unoccupied oestrogen receptors. Nature. 1984 Feb 23;307(5953):747–749. doi: 10.1038/307747a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wijnholds J., Philipsen J. N., Ab G. Tissue-specific and steroid-dependent interaction of transcription factors with the oestrogen-inducible apoVLDL II promoter in vivo. EMBO J. 1988 Sep;7(9):2757–2763. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03130.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES