Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb 4;75(1):52–62. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25588

In vivo 1H MR Spectroscopic Imaging of Glycine in Brain Tumors at 3T

Sandeep K Ganji 1,2, Elizabeth A Maher 3,4,5,6, Changho Choi 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC4524799  NIHMSID: NIHMS707232  PMID: 25651788

Abstract

Purpose

MR spectroscopic imaging of glycine (Gly) in the human brain is challenging due to the interference of the abundant neighboring J-coupled resonances. We aim to accomplish reliable imaging of Gly in healthy brain and brain tumors using an optimized MR sequence scheme at 3T.

Methods

Two dimensional 1H spectroscopic imaging (SI) was performed with a point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) scheme. An echo time of 160 ms was used for separation between Gly and myo-inositol (mIns) signals. Data were collected from eight healthy volunteers and fourteen subjects with gliomas. Spectra were analyzed, with LCModel, using numerically-calculated basis spectra. Metabolite concentrations were estimated with reference to creatine in white matter regions at 6.4 mM.

Results

From a linear regression analysis with respect to the fractional gray matter content, the Gly concentrations in pure gray and white matter in healthy brain were estimated to be 1.1 and 0.3 mM, respectively. Gly was significantly elevated in tumors. The tumor-to-contralateral Gly concentration ratio was more extensive with higher grades, showing ~10 fold elevation of Gly in glioblastomas.

Conclusion

The Gly level is significantly different between gray and white matter in healthy brain. Our data indicate that spectroscopic imaging of Gly may provide a biomarker of brain tumor malignancy.

Keywords: Glycine, Human brain, Gliomas, 1H MR spectroscopic imaging, 3T, PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy)

INTRODUCTION

Glycine (Gly), a non-essential amino acid, is a post-synaptic inhibitory neurotransmitter and acts as co-agonist of glutamate on N-methyl D-aspartate receptors (1,2). It is a precursor for the synthesis of proteins and is a primary source of one-carbon units in cellular metabolism (3). Gly is derived from serine, as a product of the Gly, serine and threonine metabolism pathway, and is hypothesized to reside in two separate pools, i.e., metabolic and transmitter pools (3,4). Recent studies indicate abnormal Gly levels in a wide range of brain tumor subtypes (512) including gliomas, as well as a variety of cancer cell lines (13). Thus Gly may be a biomarker for primary as well as metastatic brain tumors. Given the cellular heterogeneity as well as regional variations in metabolic alterations (1416) in brain tumors, imaging of Gly may have important clinical application in the management of patients with brain tumors.

Gly has two uncoupled co-resonating protons, giving rise to a singlet at 3.55 ppm (17). In vivo detection of Gly using 1H MRS in the human brain is challenging primarily due to the presence of the overlapping multiplets of myo-inositol (mIns), whose concentration is much higher (5 – 7 fold) than the Gly concentration in normal physiological conditions (10,11,18,19). Thus, sufficiently strong suppression of the mIns multiplet in the proximity of the Gly resonance is essential for reliable detection of Gly. Several single-voxel localized MRS approaches were proposed to overcome the spectral complexity in Gly measurement, which include TE averaging (19) and triple refocusing (20) at 3T, and short-TE single-spin echo (18) and long-TE PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy) methods (11) at 7T. Prior in vivo studies for Gly elevation in brain tumors used single-voxel localized MRS (8,10) and multi-voxel MRS imaging (7,12). While single-voxel MRS is technically simple and may be preferable for precise measurement of Gly, given the high heterogeneity of brain tumors (1416) and the presence of regional variation of Gly levels in the normal human brain (11), applicability of Gly spectroscopic imaging is very high.

In the current paper, we report 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of Gly in the human brain at 3T, which was developed from a Gly-optimized PRESS TE = 160 ms scheme (10). Following the validation in a phantom solution, the feasibility of the Gly spectroscopic imaging method was tested in healthy volunteers and subjects with brain tumors. Spectral fitting was used to resolve the Gly signal from the neighboring metabolite signals. Regional variations of Gly in healthy brain are discussed with linear regression analysis. Numerical simulations were performed to investigate the effect of linewidth and signal-to-noise (SNR) on reliable estimation of Gly. Preliminary tumor data are presented in comparison with the contralateral regions in subjects with brain tumors.

METHODS

Fourteen adult patients with gliomas (median age 43, range 24 – 69) were enrolled in this study. The set of tumor grade comprised 5 grade II, 4 grade III, and 5 grade IV. The tumor subtypes included 7 oligodendrogliomas, 2 astrocytomas, and 5 glioblastomas. The tumor grade and subtypes were determined by histology on biopsy, with World Health Organization criteria. In addition, 8 healthy volunteers (median age 27.5; range 26 – 29) were studied as controls. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and written informed consent was obtained prior to MR scans.

MR experiments were carried out on a 3.0 T whole-body scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), equipped with an integrated body coil for radio-frequency (RF) transmission and an 8-channel phased-array coil for signal reception. 1H MR spectroscopic imaging (SI) data were obtained using phase encoding gradients within a PRESS sequence for spatial localization. The volume of interest (VOI) was prescribed by the PRESS sequence with TE = 160 ms (TE1 = 60 ms and TE2 = 100 ms). The PRESS sequence included 9.8 ms 90° (along the anterior-posterior direction) and 13.2 ms 180° (along the left-right and head-foot directions) RF pulses, with bandwidths of 4.2 and 1.3 kHz, respectively, at an RF field intensity of 13.5 µT. Validation experiments were performed on a 10 cm diameter spherical phantom that contained Gly, mIns and creatine (Cr) at 1.1 mM, 10 mM and 8 mM, respectively. Phantom SI data were obtained with a 32 × 32 data matrix with a field of view (FOV) of 160 × 160 mm2, VOI of 50 × 50 mm2, using a TR of 3000 ms and four signal averages. For comparison with SI data, single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) data were obtained from a voxel size of 10×10×10 mm3, using a TR of 3000 ms and 256 signal averages.

For in vivo experiments in healthy volunteers, the MR protocol included survey imaging followed by a T1-weighted high-resolution sagittal Magnetization Prepared RApid Gradient Echo (MPRAGE, TE/TI/TR= 3.8/875/1360 ms, 160 slices with 1 mm thickness, 256×256×160 mm3 field of view) sequence. For brain tumors, the MR protocol included survey imaging followed by T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2w-FLAIR) imaging (TR/TE/TI = 11000/125/2800 ms, FOV = 230 × 230 mm2, slice thickness of 5 mm, 28 slices along each of transverse and sagittal directions) for tumor identification.

For SI data acquisitions, a PRESS-prescribed transverse slice was positioned to cover the region of interest with spatial resolution of 10 × 10 mm2 and slice thickness of 15 mm. In each SI scan, a 20 × 16 data matrix was obtained from a 200 × 160 mm2 FOV. A vendor-supplied 2D elliptical k-space sampling scheme was used (21), to reduce the acquisition time by ~30%. Each k-space point with 1024 complex points was acquired with two averages at TR = 1.2 s and spectral width = 2000 Hz. The SI data were reconstructed with 2D Fourier transformation of the k-space data, after zero filling the non-acquired k-space points and zero-padding the data matrix to two fold along each phase encoding direction (i.e., 40 × 32) to obtain interpolated spatial resolution of 5 × 5 mm2. The PRESS RF pulses were tuned to 3 ppm which is halfway between the N-acetylaspartylglutamate 4.6 ppm and lactate 1.3 ppm resonances. Water suppression was performed using a four RF-pulse scheme (22). In healthy brain a VOI of 80 × 80 mm2 was positioned to cover the central brain region above the corpus callosum and for tumor scans the VOI included the tumor mass as well as normal-appearing brain regions. Four outer volume suppression bands were placed in the periphery of the VOI to minimize potential contamination from extracranial lipids and water outside the VOI. First- and second-order shimming was carried out on VOI using FASTMAP (23). To minimize motion artifacts, foam pads were placed to restrict head motions inside the reception coil. The scan time of a single SI acquisition was approximately 10 minutes.

During post-processing, residual water signals were further minimized using a singular value decomposition algorithm in jMRUI (7,10,24,25). A 1-Hz exponential function was multiplied to FIDs prior to Fourier transformation, in order to suppress potential distortions in the later part of the FIDs. Correction for frequency differences across the FOV was performed using in-house programs written in MATLAB® (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The FIDs were zero filled to 4096 points and spectra were analyzed with LCModel (Version 6.3) (26,27) using numerically simulated basis sets, which were calculated according to a published method (25). The basis function included simulated spectra of sixteen brain metabolites; Gly, mIns, tCr (creatine + phophocreatine), tNAA (N-acetylaspartate + N-acetylaspartylglutamate), tCho (phosphocholine + glycerophosphocholine + free choline), glutamate, glutamine, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutathione, lactate, alanine, taurine, scyllo-inositol, aspartate, phosphoethanolamine, and serine. Spectral fitting was undertaken between 0.5 – 4.1 ppm. For validation purpose, additional LCModel fitting was performed without Gly in the basis sets. For estimation of mIns, tCr, and tCho concentrations, the transverse relaxation effects were corrected using published T2 values of 200, 150, and 230 ms, respectively (10,28). The T2 of Gly was assumed to be equal to the mIns T2. Metabolite estimates in molar concentrations (mM) were then obtained with reference to tCr in white matter regions at 6.4 mM (2932), ignoring potential difference in T1 saturation effects between metabolites in healthy brain and tumors (33). The linewidth (FWHM) estimates were obtained from the LCModel output. Maps of metabolite estimates and Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) for the VOI were generated. The maps (e.g. matrix of size 16 × 16) were then interpolated 10 fold (e.g. 160 × 160) using the nearest neighbor method. The correction for chemical shift displacement effects was performed by shifting the metabolite matrix grid according to the ratio of the chemical shift difference of metabolite resonances from the PRESS RF carrier frequency (3.03 ppm) with respect to the PRESS RF pulse bandwidths. For this, a major resonance was chosen for each metabolite based on the highest signal selectivity. The major resonances used were 3.55, 3.62, 3.21, and 3.03 ppm for Gly, mIns, tCho, and tCr, respectively. For Gly, the chemical shift displacement of the VOI was 2% and 5% along the anterior-posterior (selected by the 90° pulse) and left-right directions (selected by the 180° pulse), respectively. After the shift, the matrix grid was reduced to the original matrix size by averaging over 10 × 10 pixels. In case of healthy brain data, the central 13 × 13 grid was selected for analysis of GM and WM linear regression and to generate average metabolite maps. The chemical shift displacement along through-slice direction, selected by the second 180° pulse, was ignored.

For healthy brain data only, gray and white matter (GM and WM) segmentation was performed on MPRAGE images using SPM 5. Fifteen slices of MPRAGE corresponding to an SI slab were selected from the segmented images and averaged to obtain the GM, WM and CSF contents within each of the SI voxels. Metabolite concentrations from healthy brain data were corrected for cerebrospinal fluid contamination (34). To obtain the metabolite concentrations in pure GM and WM, the tissue concentration of metabolite was fitted with a linear function of fractional GM content, fGM = GM/(GM+WM), individually for each of the subjects, and subsequently the intercepts at fGM = 0 and 1 were averaged over the 8 subjects. Paired two tailed t-tests were conducted for comparing the metabolite concentrations and CRLBs between pure GM and WM in the healthy brain. For tumor data, paired and unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the metabolite levels between tumors and normal-appearing brain and between tumor grades. Statistical significance was declared for p-value ≤ 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using software SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Gary, NC).

RESULTS

Phantom Studies

The PRESS (TE1, TE2) = (60, 100) ms method was tested in a phantom solution with Gly and mIns for both SI and SVS acquisitions. The multiplet of mIns at ~3.55 ppm was substantially attenuated, affording good separation of the Gly singlet from the mIns background signal (Fig.1c and 1d). For a prepared mIns-to-Gly concentration ratio of 10/1.1 and a singlet linewidth (FWHM) of 3 Hz, a computer simulation of 90°-acquisition indicated that the largest peak of mIns at ~3.55 ppm is 9.5 fold greater than the Glysignal. The peak amplitude of mIns in the phantom was decreased by 17 fold at TE = 160 ms when compared to 90°-acquisition and consequently the mIns-to-Gly peak amplitude ratio at 3.55 ppm was 0.57. This mIns signal suppression occurred similarly in SI and SVS data, and the Gly+mIns composite signal pattern was about the same for SI and SVS. The Gly and mIns signals were well reproduced by LCModel fitting, with uniform residuals between 2.7 and 4.2 ppm in both SI and SVS. Following the correction for transverse relaxation effects using measured phantom T2’s of Gly (1.5 s) and mIns (0.75 s), the Gly and mIns concentrations were estimated as 1.1 and 10.2 mM, respectively. T2 of mIns was obtained by fitting phantom data with the simulated signal of mIns at various echo times.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

SI and SVS data were acquired with PRESS TE = 160 ms from a phantom containing Gly (1.1 mM), mIns (10 mM) and Cr (10.0 mM). (a) The FOV (blue line; 160 × 160 mm2) and VOI (brown line; 50 × 50 mm2) are shown in a gradient echo image. Fine grids indicate the individual voxels of the SI. (b) Spectra from the VOI are presented between 2.7 and 4.2 ppm. (c,d) SI and SVS spectra and LCModel fitting results. Vertical dashed lines are drawn at 3.55 and 3.62 ppm. Data were acquired using a TR of 3000 ms. The SI data were acquired with a single average for each k-space point, while the SVS spectrum was acquired with 256 signal averages. The spectra are broadened to singlet linewidth of ~3 Hz.

Healthy Brain Studies

The PRESS TE = 160 ms SI method was evaluated for imaging of Gly in healthy brain. Figure 2 shows representative data from a healthy subject. For an SI slab positioned above the corpus callosum (Figs. 2a and 2b, blue line), the spectra within a 65×65 mm2 volume (Fig. 2b, brown line) showed well defined metabolite signals without substantial baseline distortions (Fig. 2c). Two spectra from GM and WM dominant regions were analyzed using basis sets with and without Gly (Figs. 2d and 2e). In the spectral fitting with a basis set with Gly the in vivo spectra were closely reproduced by the fit. In the spectra from the GM dominant region (Fig. 2d), the signals of Gly (3.55 ppm) and mIns (3.62 ppm) were readily discernible, similarly as in the phantom data (Fig. 1c). The Gly level was estimated to be 0.8 mM with CRLB of 9%, and the mIns was 9.2 mM with CRLB of 4%, with reference to tCr in white matter at 6.4 mM. When Gly was excluded from the basis set, residual signals were clearly present at ~3.55 ppm, indicating that the signal at 3.55 ppm was primarily attributed to Gly. The absence of Gly in the basis set influenced mIns estimation, resulting in higher estimate (11.0 mM). In contrast, spectra from WM dominant region (Fig. 2e) gave lower estimate of Gly (0.3 mM) and mIns (6.2 mM), with larger CRLBs compared to the data from the GM dominant region. The residual difference between the fittings with and without Gly was relatively small in spectra from WM region. The linewidth of the spectra from GM and WM dominant regions were 5.7 and 5.6 Hz, respectively. The LCModel returned SNRs of the spectra were very similar between the fittings with and without Gly (i.e., 50 vs. 49 for GM and 45 vs. 45 for WM).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Representative 1H SI data from a healthy volunteer. (a, b) The FOV (blue line) and VOI (brown line) of the SI are shown in T1w-MPRAGE images. The VOI was prescribed by PRESS localization (TE = 160 ms). Fine grids indicate the individual voxels of the SI. The mean tCr estimate over the voxels within a red line was set to 6.4 mM after CSF correction and used as reference for metabolite quantification. (c) Spectra from voxels within the VOI are shown between 4.1 to 1.0 ppm. (d, e) Spectra from a voxel in the gray matter (blue box) and from a voxel in the white matter (green box) dominant regions are shown together with LCModel fits, baseline, and residuals that were obtained using basis sets with and without Gly. The Gly and mIns signals, returned by LCModel, are shown with the concentration estimates and CRLBs. Vertical lines are drawn at 3.55 ppm.

Concentration and CRLB maps were averaged over the eight healthy subjects, using axial T1w-MPRAGE images as anatomical reference. The averaged concentration map of Gly showed regional variations of Gly levels in the brain (Fig. 3a). The Gly concentration was constantly high in the GM dominant regions along the anterior-posterior midline, whereas the left and right parietal WM-rich regions showed markedly low concentrations of Gly. The Gly concentration was estimated to be 1.0 ± 0.4 mM (mean ± SD, n = 8) for the GM dominant regions (as indicated by a black line Fig.3a, regions with GM/(GM+WM) > 80%) and 0.4 ± 0.2 mM for the WM rich regions (red line in Fig.3a, regions with WM/(GM+WM) > 95%). The mean CRLBs of Gly and mIns were 16 ± 17% and 9 ± 3% for GM regions, and 24 ± 16% and 6 ± 1% for WM regions, respectively. The Gly CRLBs showed significant difference between GM and WM (p < 0.001), while the mIns CRLB difference between the regions was not significant (p > 0.05). The mean correlation coefficient between Gly and mIns, returned by LCModel, was −0.31 ± 0.10 and −0.19 ± 0.09 in GM and WM dominant regions, respectively. The negative value of the correlation coefficient was as expected given the equal polarity of the Gly and mIns signals at the echo time used. Figures 3c and 3d show the linear regression of the Gly and mIns concentrations versus fractional GM content for an individual subject. The Gly and mIns concentrations both increased with fractional GM content. From the y-intercepts at unity and zero fractional GM contents, the concentrations in pure GM and WM were estimated to be 1.1 ± 0.2 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mM for Gly, and 10.2 ± 1.1 and 5.7 ± 1.2 mM for mIns, respectively. The difference of Gly level between pure GM and WM was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similar regional variation was observed in mIns and tCr, with significantly higher concentrations in GM than in WM (p < 0.001 for both).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

(a) Concentration and CRLB maps of Gly, mIns, and tCr for the VOI (green box in a T1w-MPRAGE image), averaged over eight healthy volunteers. The maps were smoothened by eight fold using a bi-cubic polynomial function, after the corrections for theCSF contamination and chemical-shift displacement effects. Averaged Gly-mIns correlation coefficients (returned by LCModel) are mapped on linear scale between −0.5 and 0.5. (b) Gray matter and white matter segmented brain images are shown with the SI VOI. (c, d) Linear regression of Gly and mIns tissue concentrations with respect to fractional GM contents from a single subject. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals of the linear fit.

Due to the small spectral distance between the Gly singlet (3.55 ppm) and the largest peak of mIns at (3.62 ppm), detection of the small Gly signal in healthy brain may depend on linewidth. The effect of linewidth on Gly detection was investigated with spectral fitting on simulated spectra with various linewidths (Fig. 4). Simulation included Gly, mIns, NAA, Cr, Cho, Glu and Gln spectra. With the linewidth of 4 – 7 Hz in our in vivo data, spectra were generated for singlet linewidths of 3.5 – 7.5 Hz. Based on our estimated Gly-to-mIns ratios in GM and WM dominant regions, the simulations were performed with Gly-to-mIns concentration ratios of 1:10 and 1:20 for GM and WM, respectively. The spectral pattern of the Gly+mIns composite signal was well preserved across the linewidth and the Gly signal was constantly discernible. LCModel fitting of the calculated spectra with in vivo noise level reproduced the Gly and mIns concentrations used for generating the spectra. The Gly-to-mIns estimated ratio was 0.099 ± 0.002 and 0.047 ± 0.001 for simulated Gly-to-mIns concentration ratios of 1:10 and 1:20, respectively. Gly and mIns estimates were within 5% of the true values. The Gly CRLBs were 6 ± 1% and 18 ± 2% for Gly-to-mIns ratio of 1:10 and 1:20, respectively.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Numerically-calculated spectra and LCModel fitting results are shown for Gly-to-mIns = 1:10 (a) and 1:20 (b). Spectra were broadened to singlet linewidth of 3.5 – 7.5 Hz and random noise was added to the spectra such that the ratio of the NAA singlet amplitude to the noise standard deviation was 50 for all the linewidths. The metabolites include Gly (1 and 0.3 in (a) and (b) respectively), mIns (10 and 6 in (a) and (b) respectively), NAA (10), Cr (8), Cho (2), Glu (9), and Gln (2), where the numbers in brackets are the concentrations.

Brain Tumor Studies

The PRESS SI method was used to acquire data from fourteen subjects with gliomas. Figure 5 shows data from a subject with glioblastoma (grade IV), in which T2w-FLAIR imaging identified two distinct lesions in the left mid-to-posterior brain. Spectra from the two lesions (labeled A and C in Fig. 5) showed a large singlet like signal at 3.55 ppm with a much smaller signal at 3.62 ppm, compared to the contralateral normal brain (labeled B and D). Spectral analyses of the data showed that Gly was higher in the posterior lesion (labeled C; 4.2 mM) than in the other lesion (labeled A; 2.8 mM). The ratio of the elevated Gly to the contralateral normal Gly level was 9.3 and 7.0 for the posterior and mid brain lesions, respectively. In contrast, tCho was extensively elevated (~5 mM) in the mid brain tumor (labeled A) compared to the other lesion (labeled C; ~3 mM). The variations in the Gly and tCho levels between the lesions were clearly contrasted in the concentration maps.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

SI data from a subject with multi-focal glioblastoma. Spectra from tumors (labeled A and C) and the corresponding contralateral locations (labeled B and D) are shown together with spectral analysis results. The concentrations of Gly and mIns were estimated with reference to the mean tCr estimate within a black box in the T2w-FLAIR image at 6.4 mM.

For the 14 tumor patients, the Gly level was evaluated by averaging the estimate over ~4 voxels for each of the tumors and each of the contralateral normal appearing brain. Necrotic regions were not present in the tumors and no significant lipid or macromolecule signals were observed. The mean concentration of Gly in 14 patients was 1.8 ± 1.4 mM (CRLB of 11 ± 7 %) and 0.4 ± 0.2 mM (CRLB of 18 ± 10 %) for tumor and contralateral regions, respectively. Figure 6 presents the group comparison of the metabolite estimates. For grade II, III and IV gliomas, the mean Gly level in tumors was estimated to be 1.2 ± 0.6 (N = 5 subjects), 0.7 ± 0.1 (N = 4), and 3.3 ± 1.5 (N = 5) mM respectively, which were all significantly higher than the normal levels in the contralateral brain (0.5 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 0.2, and 0.5 ± 0.3 mM respectively). Here the contralateral Gly level in glioblastoma patients was calculated from 3 patients, excluding 2 cases in which the tumor was located in brainstem. The mean Gly level was lower in grade III than in grade II tumors (0.7 vs. 1.2), but the ratio of the elevated Gly in tumors with respect to the contralateral brain was higher in grade III than in grade II (3.0 vs. 2.3). This was largely because the contralateral Gly estimate was very low in the grade III patients in whom the tumors were located mostly in WM dominant regions. Glioblastoma (grade IV) showed significantly higher Gly level compared to grade II and III tumors (p < 0.05 and 0.01 respectively). Excluding the 2 glioblastomas in brainstem, the mean tumor-to-contralateral Gly ratio in glioblastoma was calculated to be 10.5, significantly higher than those in grade II and III (p < 0.01and p < 0.02 respectively). Taken together, the Gly elevation was significantly higher in grade IV than in grade II and III, indicating that elevated Gly may be a marker of tumor malignancy. For tCho, the mean concentration in tumors was higher than the contralateral value for all three grades, but the difference between the tumor and contralateral regions was significant only in grade III. The mean tCho level or the tumor-to-contralateral tCho ratio was not significantly different between the grades. The Gly-to-tCho ratio in tumors was significantly larger in grade IV compared to grade II and grade III (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) and a significant difference was not observed between grade II and grade III tumors.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

The mean Gly and tCho concentrations in the tumor and contralateral brain regions in 5 grade II, 4 grade III, and 5 grade IV gliomas are bar graphed with standard deviations. The contralateral estimates in grade IV were calculated from 3 patients, excluding 2 patients in whom the tumor was located in brainstem. Statistical significance is shown for p < 0.05, with an asterisk (*) for paired t-test and a dagger (†) for unpaired t-test.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The present study reports in vivo 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of Gly in healthy brain and brain tumors at 3T. The use of an optimized PRESS TE (160 ms) gave an effective suppression of the mIns signal in the proximity of the Gly resonance and consequently allowed Gly measurement with minimal contamination from the mIns background signals. The data indicated the presence of a regional variation of Gly concentrations in the healthy brain. The Gly concentration was estimated to be higher by > 2 fold in GM than in WM from a linear regression analysis, in good agreement with a recent single-voxel MRS study at 7T (11). The mean Gly CRLB was much smaller in GM voxels than in WM voxels (16% vs. 24%), which may be largely due to the regional difference of Gly. The Gly level was significantly increased in tumors. Compared to the contralateral normal appearing brain, Gly elevation in tumors was more extensive with increasing tumor grade, suggesting Gly as a potential biomarker of tumor malignancy. The observation of elevated Gly in all tumors in the current study is contrasted with the result from a prior study (10), which reported that Gly was elevated only in a subset of glioblastomas as measured using a single-voxel localized PRESS TE = 160 ms method. Given that in this prior study abnormal Gly levels in tumors were evaluated with respect to the normal level (~0.6 mM) in the GM dominant region (medial occipital brain), it is most likely that elevated Gly in some tumors in WM dominant regions (e.g., Fig. 4c in reference 10) was interpreted as normal. Of note, for the location of the tumor in the left-hemisphere WM dominant region, the normal Gly level was estimated to be approximately 0.3 mM in the present study.

The capability to discriminate Gly singlet from mIns signals could be affected by shimming. The in vivo linewidth was 4 – 7 Hz in healthy brain and 4 – 6 Hz in tumors in our data set. LCModel analysis of simulated spectra indicated that Gly estimate was not substantially influenced by increase in linewidth up to 7.5 Hz (see Fig. 4). Also, Gly detection may depend on SNR. In the present study we observed a mean NAA SNR (calculated as ratio of peak amplitude of NAA and standard deviation of noise from signal-free region) of 74 ± 15 in the voxels with GM/(GM+WM) > 70% and 84 ± 12 in the voxels with WM/(GM+WM) > 80% in healthy brain data. The mean NAA SNR was 78 ± 12 for an estimated Gly concentration of 0.3 mM or more. Based on the analysis of 169 spectra from each of the 8 healthy subjects, Gly concentration of 0.3 mM or higher was measurable with CRLB < 20% when NAA SNR is > 70. LCModel analysis on in vivo healthy brain SVS data at TE = 160 ms indicated reliable Gly detection at NAA SNR of 70 or greater (data not shown). The voxel size of the SI was set at 1.5 mL at acquisition and reconstructed at 0.375 mL, to achieve a sufficient SNR for Gly detection within an acceptable time frame. The spatial resolution of 1.5 mL is lower than those in some prior SI studies (~0.8 mL) (7,3537). The spatial resolution of SI may be possibly enhanced without substantial loss of spectral information using echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (38), parallel imaging (36,37), and compressed sensing (39,40) techniques.

The T2 of Gly was assumed to be identical to T2 of mIns (200 ms), and this assumption may introduce small error in estimation of Gly, depending on the difference in Gly and mIns T2s. In phantom studies Gly T2 was measured to be long compared to T2 of mIns (1.5 s vs. 0.75 s). However, the phantom T2 data may not be directly applicable to the in vivo situation since T2 may differ between aqueous solutions and brain tissue. For instance, the in vivo T2 values of the CH3 group protons of Cr and NAA are quite different in human brain (i.e., 150 vs. 300 ms) while their T2 values in phantom solutions are very similar. Also, the mIns T2 may be longer than the Cr CH3 T2 in brain (28,41), but it is the opposite in an aqueous solution. Given the small molecular size of Gly, the Gly molecules may be very mobile in vitro and consequently the Gly CH2 proton T2 is measured to be long (i.e., much longer than the Cr CH2 T2 and similar to the Cr and NAA CH3 T2s). For proton NMR, although the intra-molecular dipole-dipole interaction is a dominant mechanism for T2 relaxation in most cases, there may be several other factors that affect the TE dependence of PRESS signals (namely, apparent T2), which may include molecular diffusion, magnetization transfer (42), and the environments in which the molecules reside. In addition, the T1 saturation effects between GM and WM were assumed to be equal, based on our in vivo experiments (data not shown), in which the Gly and mIns composite signal pattern and estimate ratios from GM and WM dominant regions were very similar between TR = 1.2 and 2.5 s. The potential difference of metabolite T1 between healthy brain and tumors was ignored, as reported in a prior study (Li et al. JMRI 2008).

Spectroscopic imaging of Gly may provide a clinically useful tool compared to single-voxel MRS. The brain Gly level appears to be quite different between GM and WM, as shown in a prior study (11) and in the current study. The Gly elevation may be regionally different between many brain lesions, as shown in Fig. 5. Our data indicated ~2 fold difference in Gly levels between the lesions and more than 4 fold elevations when compared to contralateral normal brain regions. To date, noninvasive in vivo detection of elevated Gly in malignant tumors has been achieved largely using single-voxel MRS (8,10). Gly spectroscopic imaging may provide a unique opportunity to study multiple lesions and to investigate the disease infiltration into surrounding normal tissue. In a prior Gly imaging study at 3T by Hattingen et al., data were acquired at both short (~30 ms) and long echo times (~140 ms) and the spectral difference between the two TEs was analyzed to obtain the Gly portion of the composite signal (7). As demonstrated in the current study and in a prior study (12), imaging of Gly and mIns can be achieved using a single refined optimized TE, which simplifies the spectral analysis without need of additional data analysis. A major drawback of our SI method is extensive T2 signal loss due to the use of long TE (160 ms), but selected signals are often better resolved at optimized long TE, benefiting from attenuated macromolecule signals (11,43). With its improved ability for Gly detection, the proposed Gly SI method may have extended applications for which alterations of Gly levels are relatively small.

The ability to image Gly in the human brain may have important applications in the diagnosis and management of malignant brain tumors. Tumors reprogram their metabolism to meet the needs of rapid cell growth and survival in harsh environments (44). Thus, changes in metabolite abundance relative to normal tissue may serve as a biomarker of malignancy. Evidence suggests that production of Gly is under oncogenic control, emphasizing its importance in tumor biology (45). A recent mass spectrometry study in a wide range of cancer cell lines (NCI-60) (13) indicates that Gly may play a critical role in rapid cell proliferation. Elevation of Gly in tumors relative to contralateral is distinctly pronounced in GBM compared to lower grade tumors (~10 fold vs. ~3 fold). Thus longitudinal monitoring of Gly in serial measurements in patients may provide a noninvasive tool for early detection of malignant transformation. A recent study indicated correlation of Gly elevation with increase in tCho, cerebral blood flow, and enhancement of contrast in MR imaging (12). Hence the capability to monitor the changes in Gly levels noninvasively by means of spectroscopic imaging would help to identify diffuse infiltration into normal brain and/or metabolically active regions in the periphery of the tumor mass.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants CA159128 and CA154843, and by Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas grants RP140021-P04 and RP130427. We thank Dr. Ivan Dimitrov for technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Legendre P. The glycinergic inhibitory synapse. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58:760–793. doi: 10.1007/PL00000899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benarroch EE. Glycine and its synaptic interactions: Functional and clinical implications. Neurology. 2011;77:677–683. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822a2791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lamers Y, Williamson J, Theriaque DW, Shuster JJ, Gilbert LR, Keeling C, Stacpoole PW, Gregory JF. Production of 1-Carbon Units from Glycine Is Extensive in Healthy Men and Women. J Nutr. 2009;139:666–671. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.103580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eulenburg V, Armsen W, Betz H, Gomeza J. Glycine transporters: essential regulators of neurotransmission. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kinoshita Y, Yokota A. Absolute concentrations of metabolites in human brain tumors using in vitro proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1997;10:2–12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199701)10:1<2::aid-nbm442>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lehnhardt F-G, Bock C, Röhn G, Ernestus R-I, Hoehn M. Metabolic differences between primary and recurrent human brain tumors: a 1H NMR spectroscopic investigation. NMR Biomed. 2005;18:371–382. doi: 10.1002/nbm.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hattingen E, Lanfermann H, Quick J, Franz K, Zanella FE, Pilatus U. 1H MR spectroscopic imaging with short and long echo time to discriminate glycine in glial tumours. MAGMA. 2009;22:33–41. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0145-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davies NP, Wilson M, Natarajan K, Sun Y, MacPherson L, Brundler MA, Arvanitis TN, Grundy RG, Peet AC. Non-invasive detection of glycine as a biomarker of malignancy in childhood brain tumours using in-vivo 1H MRS at 1.5 Tesla confirmed by ex-vivo high-resolution magic-angle spinning NMR. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:80–87. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Righi V, Andronesi OC, Mintzopoulos D, Black PM, Tzika AA. High-resolution magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy detects glycine as a biomarker in brain tumors. Int J Oncol. 2010;36:301–306. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, Dimitrov IE, Pascual JM, Bachoo R, Mickey BE, Malloy CR, Maher EA. Measurement of glycine in the human brain in vivo by 1H-MRS at 3 T: application in brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:609–618. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Banerjee A, Ganji S, Hulsey K, Dimitrov I, Maher E, Ghose S, Tamminga C, Choi C. Measurement of glycine in gray and white matter in the human brain in vivo by 1H MRS at 7.0 T. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68:325–331. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maudsley AA, Gupta RK, Stoyanova R, Parra NA, Roy B, Sheriff S, Hussain N, Behari S. Mapping of Glycine Distributions in Gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:31–36. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jain M, Nilsson R, Sharma S, Madhusudhan N, Kitami T, Souza AL, Kafri R, Kirschner MW, Clish CB, Mootha VK. Metabolite Profiling Identifies a Key Role for Glycine in Rapid Cancer Cell Proliferation. Science. 2012;336:1040–1044. doi: 10.1126/science.1218595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Howe FA, Barton SJ, Cudlip SA, Stubbs M, Saunders DE, Murphy M, Wilkins P, Opstad KS, Doyle VL, McLean MA, Bell BA, Griffiths JR. Metabolic profiles of human brain tumors using quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:223–232. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuesel AC, Donnelly SM, Halliday W, Sutherland GR, Smith ICP. Mobile lipids and metabolic heterogeneity of brain tumours as detectable by Ex Vivo 1H MR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 1994;7:172–180. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1940070404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ott D, Hennig J, Ernst T. Human brain tumors: assessment with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1993;186:745–752. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley AA. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2000;13:129–153. doi: 10.1002/1099-1492(200005)13:3<129::aid-nbm619>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gambarota G, Mekle R, Xin L, Hergt M, van der Zwaag W, Krueger G, Gruetter R. In vivo measurement of glycine with short echo-time 1H MRS in human brain at 7 T. MAGMA. 2009;22:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prescot AP, de BFB, Wang L, Brown J, Jensen JE, Kaufman MJ, Renshaw PF. In vivo detection of brain glycine with echo-time-averaged (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 4.0 T. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:681–686. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choi C, Bhardwaj PP, Seres P, Kalra S, Tibbo PG, Coupland NJ. Measurement of glycine in human brain by triple refocusing 1H-MRS in vivo at 3.0T. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:59–64. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maudsley AA, Matson GB, Hugg JW, Weiner MW. Reduced phase encoding in spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:645–651. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ogg RJ, Kingsley RB, Taylor JS. WET, a T1- and B1-Insensitive Water-Suppression Method for in Vivo Localized 1H NMR Spectroscopy. J Magn Reson B. 1994;104:1–10. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gruetter R. Automatic, localized in Vivo adjustment of all first-and second-order shim coils. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:804–811. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910290613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naressi A, Couturier C, Devos J, Janssen M, Mangeat C, Beer R, Graveron-Demilly D. Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package. MAGMA. 2001;12:141–152. doi: 10.1007/BF02668096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, Hatanpaa KJ, Rakheja D, Kovacs Z, Yang XL, Mashimo T, Raisanen JM, Marin-Valencia I, Pascual JM, Madden CJ, Mickey BE, Malloy CR, Bachoo RM, Maher EA. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nature medicine. 2012;18:624–629. doi: 10.1038/nm.2682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:672–679. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Provencher SW. Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed. 2001;14:260–264. doi: 10.1002/nbm.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ganji SK, Banerjee A, Patel AM, Zhao YD, Dimitrov IE, Browning JD, Sherwood Brown E, Maher EA, Choi C. T2 measurement of J-coupled metabolites in the human brain at 3T. NMR Biomed. 2012;25:523–529. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ganji SK, An Z, Banerjee A, Madan A, Hulsey KM, Choi C. Measurement of regional variation of GABA in the human brain by optimized point-resolved spectroscopy at 7 T in vivo. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:1167–1175. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Natt O, Bezkorovaynyy V, Michaelis T, Frahm J. Use of phased array coils for a determination of absolute metabolite concentrations. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:3–8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schuff N, Ezekiel F, Gamst AC, Amend DL, Capizzano AA, Maudsley AA, Weiner MW. Region and tissue differences of metabolites in normally aged brain using multislice 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:899–907. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiebenga OT, Klauser AM, Nagtegaal GJA, Schoonheim MM, Barkhof F, Geurts JJG, Pouwels PJW. Longitudinal absolute metabolite quantification of white and gray matter regions in healthy controls using proton MR spectroscopic imaging. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:304–311. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Y, Srinivasan R, Ratiney H, Lu Y, Chang SM, Nelson SJ. Comparison of T1 and T2 metabolite relaxation times in glioma and normal brain at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:342–350. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McLean MA, Woermann FG, Barker GJ, Duncan JS. Quantitative analysis of short echo time 1H-MRSI of cerebral gray and white matter. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:401–411. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3<401::aid-mrm10>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pan JW, Hetherington HP, Vaughan JT, Mitchell G, Pohost GM, Whitaker JN. Evaluation of multiple sclerosis by 1H spectroscopic imaging at 4.1 T. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:72–77. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bonekamp D, Smith MA, Zhu H, Barker PB. Quantitative SENSE-MRSI of the human brain. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:305–313. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dydak U, Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Meier D, Boesiger P. Sensitivity-encoded spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:713–722. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Posse S, Otazo R, Caprihan A, Bustillo J, Chen H, Henry PG, Marjanska M, Gasparovic C, Zuo C, Magnotta V, Mueller B, Mullins P, Renshaw P, Ugurbil K, Lim KO, Alger JR. Proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging of J-coupled resonances in human brain at 3 and 4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:236–244. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Geethanath S, Baek H-M, Ganji SK, Ding Y, Maher EA, Sims RD, Choi C, Lewis MA, Kodibagkar VD. Compressive Sensing Could Accelerate 1H MR Metabolic Imaging in the Clinic. Radiology. 2012;262:985–994. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cao P, Wu EX. Accelerating phase-encoded proton MR spectroscopic imaging by compressed sensing. J Magn Reson. 2014 doi: 10.1002/jmri.24553. (Early View) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xin L, Gambarota G, Mlynárik V, Gruetter R. Proton T2 relaxation time of J-coupled cerebral metabolites in rat brain at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:396–401. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dreher W, Norris DG, Leibfritz D. Magnetization transfer affects the proton creatine/phosphocreatine signal intensity: In vivo demonstration in the rat brain. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:81–84. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schubert F, Gallinat J, Seifert F, Rinneberg H. Glutamate concentrations in human brain using single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1762–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hanahan D, Weinberg Robert A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nikiforov MA, Chandriani S, O'Connell B, Petrenko O, Kotenko I, Beavis A, Sedivy JM, Cole MD. A Functional Screen for Myc-Responsive Genes Reveals Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase, a Major Source of the One-Carbon Unit for Cell Metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5793–5800. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.16.5793-5800.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES