Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 May 28;24(8):1277–1281. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1351

Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and survival after diagnosis with kidney cancer

David C Muller 1,*, Ghislaine Scelo 1, David Zaridze 2, Vladimir Janout 3, Ivana Holcatova 4, Marie Navratilova 5, Dana Mates 6, Øivind Midttun 7, Per Magne Ueland 8,9, Paul Brennan 1, Mattias Johansson 1,*
PMCID: PMC4526455  NIHMSID: NIHMS694839  PMID: 26021552

Abstract

Prospective cohort studies have provided some evidence that circulating vitamin D is associated with risk of, and survival from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but it is unclear whether concentrations of vitamin D at the time of diagnosis of renal cell RCC is associated with prognosis. We conducted a case-cohort study of 630 RCC cases, including 203 deaths) from a multi-centre case-control study in Eastern Europe. Vitamin D was assessed as 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3], and we used weighted Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by categories of season-adjusted 25(OH)D3. Higher concentrations of 25(OH)D3 were associated with lower risk of death after adjusting for stage, age, sex, and country (HR highest versus lowest category 0.57, 95% CI [0.34, 0.97]). The inverse associations of 25(OH)D3 with death were most notable among those who died from non-RCC causes and those diagnosed with early stage disease. In summary, 25(OH)D3 concentration at diagnosis of RCC was inversely associated with all-cause mortality rates, but not specifically with RCC outcome.

Keywords: Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, Kidney cancer, prognosis, survival, case-cohort

Introduction

Each year more than 300,000 new cases of kidney cancer are diagnosed worldwide, leading to approximately 130,000 deaths [1]. The prognosis is strongly dependent on stage at diagnosis, with around 90% of stage I patients alive five years after diagnosis, compared with only 10% of stage IV patients [2].

Little is known about factors influencing survival after diagnosis of kidney cancer, apart from tumor stage and grade. We recently investigated circulating vitamin D and kidney cancer onset and survival in a prospective epidemiological cohort where blood samples were collected at entry to the cohort, an average of 7 years before diagnosis [3]. In contrast to the Vitamin D Pooling Project, which found no evidence of an association [4], we reported an inverse association between vitamin D concentrations and risk of subsequent kidney cancer. This observation was consistent with another recent study in which investigators had estimated vitamin D levels [5]. Further, we observed an increased rate of death after kidney cancer diagnosis for both low and high concentrations of vitamin D. Available data did not allow thorough analysis of cause-specific mortality, nor were we able to adjust for stage. This observation prompted us to investigate whether vitamin D concentrations in blood at kidney cancer diagnosis are associated with subsequent survival, and if such an association is independent of stage or other prognostic factors.

Materials and Methods

The K2 study

Participants included patients who were above 18 years of age and diagnosed with kidney cancer in one of 4 participating centres in Czech Republic, 1 center in Romania, and 1 center in Russia. We gave participants a standardized face-to-face short lifestyle questionnaire covering socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, medical history, family history, and tobacco and alcohol use. Clinical and pathological data were abstracted from medical charts and pathological reports. A majority of participants underwent nephrectomy and the tumor was histologically confirmed. Follow-up for outcome (relapse, vital status, and cause of death where relevant) was performed every 6 to 12 months after diagnosis, using passive follow-up methods where possible (with confirmation of vital status through active follow-up methods in case of uncertainties), and active follow-up methods when no linkage to databases was possible. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the International Agency for Research on Cancer and all collaborating institutions, and we obtained written informed consent from all participants.

Case-cohort sampling

Among 2330 participants with questionnaire data available and a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 1005 participants with no follow-up data at the time of this project were excluded. The majority of the cases with no follow-up for vital status were diagnosed at the end of the study period, and thus were not included in the active follow-up to ascertain vital status. In addition, patients diagnosed in Moscow hospitals who are not resident in the Moscow area were not followed-up, nor were patients diagnosed in Serbia. We additionally excluded 125 participants with no plasma sample available, 5 participants with inconsistencies in reference dates, and 7 participants with no information on stage. From the 1188 remaining, we randomly selected 500 participants at baseline (the subcohort). We also included all participants who died during follow-up that were not randomly selected in to the subcohort (N=93), as well as 37 stage IV patients that had survived and were not randomly selected. Hence a total of 630 participants diagnosed with kidney cancer were included in the study. Median follow-up of the randomly selected subcohort was 2.5 years. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort did not differ substantially between those included in or excluded from the case-cohort sample (Supplementary Table 1).

Biosample processing and biochemical analysis

Venous blood was obtained before or at the time of the nephrectomy, prior to any treatment. Blood was collected in vacutainers containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and processed as rapidly as possible (usually within two hours). Plasma samples were stored at −80°C, except in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, where samples were stored at −20°C. All samples were transported at −80°C to IARC for long-term storage at −150°C. Samples underwent a single thawing cycle for aliquoting of 400μL for shipment to the Bevital laboratory in Bergen, Norway (www.bevital.no), for analysis. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was used to analyse vitamin D as 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 [6]. 25(OH)D2 was undetectable in the majority of samples, so our analyses focus on 25(OH)D3. The lab is DEQAS (www.deqas.org) certified.

Statistical analysis

To adjust for seasonal variation, we modeled the expected log2 25(OH)D3 concentration as a periodic function of day of blood draw using a pair of sine and cosine functions. To create season-adjusted categories, we grouped the residuals from this model at quartiles of their distribution among the randomly selected subcohort. We used Cox proportional hazards models with time since diagnosis (recruitment) as the time scale to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality by the season-adjusted categories of 25(OH)D3. We also modeled 25(OH)D3 continuously using restricted cubic splines with knots at its 10th, 33rd, 67th, and 90th percentiles, explicitly adjusting for seasonality by including the pair of sine and cosine functions. HRs for cause-specific mortality were calculated in a competing risks model using the data augmentation method [7]. To account for the case-cohort design [8], we used Barlow’s method to weight the likelihood and computed robust variance estimates [9, 10], slightly adjusted to account for the fact that we included all cases with stage IV disease (i.e., all stage IV cases received a weight of 1). We investigated potential effect modification by fitting interactions between season-adjusted log2 25(OH)D3 and various factors. All models included stage, age at recruitment, and sex as covariates, with the baseline hazard stratified by country of recruitment. We additionally adjusted for body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), smoking status (never, former, current), and alcohol drinking status (never, former, current). All p-values are two sided, and were calculated using the Wald test. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.1 for Linux (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, US) and R version 3.1.1 [11].

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample by vital status at the end of follow-up are presented in Table 1. The sample included a higher proportion of men (63%) than women, and was predominantly recruited from the Czech Republic (52%) and Russia (43%), with only 5% or participants recruited in Romania. Those participants who survived to the end of follow-up had a similar age distribution to those who died during follow-up. 518 of the 630 cases (82%) were conventional RCC. 50% of the 203 deaths occurred among participants with a stage IV tumor, and 15% of those surviving to the end of follow-up had stage IV diagnoses. In contrast, 72 % of those surviving to the end of follow-up were diagnosed with stage I–II disease. Measured 25(OH)D3 concentrations ranged between 7 and 134 nmol/L, with a median of 43 nmol/L.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants by vital status at the end of follow-up.

Vital status Total
alive dead

n (%) n (%)
Total 427 100 203 100 630
Sex Male 266 62 131 65 397
Female 161 38 72 35 233
Age at recruitment (years) [26.7,55) 118 28 37 18 155
[55,65) 161 38 88 43 249
[65,86.8] 148 35 78 38 226
Country Czech Republic 230 54 95 47 325
Russia 167 39 105 52 272
Romania 30 7 3 1 33
BMI (kg/m2) [17.2,25) 97 23 71 35 168
[25,30) 184 43 82 40 266
[30,58.5] 143 33 50 25 193
missing 3 1 0 0 3
Smoking Never smoker 213 50 92 45 305
Former smoker 108 25 54 27 162
Current smoker 106 25 57 28 163
Diabetes Yes 65 15 39 19 104
No 362 85 164 81 526
Hypertension Yes 233 55 103 51 336
No 193 45 100 49 293
missing 1 0 0 0 1
Stage I 269 63 38 19 307
II 38 9 10 5 48
III 56 13 54 27 110
IV 63 15 101 50 164
missing 1 0 0 0 1
Grade 1 73 17 7 3 80
2 173 41 53 26 226
3 67 16 50 25 117
4 15 4 18 9 33
missing 99 23 75 37 174
Histology Conventional RCC 357 84 161 79 518
Papillary RCC 41 10 10 5 51
Chromophobe RCC 11 3 5 2 16
Other 14 3 4 2 18
Unknown 4 1 23 11 27
Season-adjusted circulating 25(OH)D3 category 1 (lowest) 93 22 63 31 156
2 107 25 56 28 163
3 106 25 46 23 152
4 (highest) 121 28 38 19 159

Hazard of death from any cause was inversely associated with circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D3 (Table 2). After adjusting for stage, age, and sex, the hazard was 43% lower among those in the highest compared to the lowest group of seasonally-adjusted concentration (HR4vs1 0.57, 95% CI [0.34, 0.97]). Although no statistical evidence for heterogeneity by cause of death was noted (Pheterogeneity 0.53), we estimated HR4vs1 of 0.70 (95% CI 0.39, 1.24) for RCC specific death, and 0.36 (95% CI 0.14, 0.91) for non-RCC causes of death, suggesting that this association was not specific to RCC death (Table 2). The HR for continuously varying 25(OH)D3 (relative to a concentration of 50 nmol/L) is presented in Figure 1. These estimates corroborate those in Table 2, suggesting a monotonic inverse association between 25(OH)D3 and hazard of death.

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (HR) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for risk of all cause and cause specific mortality by season-adjusted categories of 25(OH)D3 concentration.

D3 category Ndeaths minimally adjusted adjusted

HR [95% CI] p HR [95% CI] p
all cause 1 63 1.00 .015* 1.00 .03*
2 56 1.14 [0.69, 1.90] 1.12 [0.67, 1.87]
3 46 0.81 [0.48, 1.37] 0.86 [0.51, 1.44]
4 38 0.57 [0.34, 0.97] 0.59 [0.35, 1.00]
RCC 1 42 1.00 .56§ 1.00 .53§
2 43 1.32 [0.76, 2.31] 1.30 [0.74, 2.27]
3 36 0.96 [0.54, 1.70] 1.01 [0.57, 1.79]
4 31 0.68 [0.38, 1.20] 0.70 [0.39, 1.24]
non-RCC 1 21 1.00 1.00
2 13 0.79 [0.36, 1.75] 0.76 [0.34, 1.70]
3 10 0.52 [0.21, 1.28] 0.55 [0.23, 1.35]
4 7 0.36 [0.14, 0.92] 0.36 [0.14, 0.91]

Stratified by country, and adjusted for stage, age at recruitment, and sex

Adjusted for BMI (kg/m2), smoking status, cigarettes per day, alcohol drinking status, and alcohol intake per day (mL)

*

p-values for the all-cause models are from tests against the null hypothesis that the 25(OH)D3 coefficients are identically 0.

§

p-values for the competing risks model are from tests against the null hypothesis of no heterogeneity of the coefficients by cause of death (RCC versus non-RCC).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Hazard ratio for all cause mortality among RCC cases as a function of circulating concentration of 25(OH)D3 at diagnosis, relative to a concentration of 50 nmol/L. 25(OH)D3 was modeled using restricted cubic splines with knots at the 10th, 33rd, 67th, and 90th percentiles of its distribution. Estimates were derived from a Cox model stratified by country of recruitment, and adjusted for stage, age at recruitment, sex, and seasonality (sine and cosine functions of day of blood draw). Solid and dashed lines represent the maximum pseudolikelihood estimates and 95% confidence intervals respectively. The translucent lines are 1000 draws from the multivariate normal distribution defined by the maximum pseudolikelihood estimates and their variance covariance matrix, and thus give an indication of the posterior density for the hazard ratio under a uniform prior on the regression coefficients. The “rug plot” shows the observed distribution of 25(OH)D3.

Supplementary Figure 1 presents HRs for a doubling in seasonally adjusted 25(OH)D3 concentration separately by categories of several potential effect modifiers. The estimated magnitude of the association was consistent by sex, stage, histology, history of diabetes, smoking status, and alcohol intake status. There was some indication that the association might be stronger among those diagnosed at age 65 years or older, those with a history of hypertension, those with higher BMI, and those diagnosed with stage I or II RCC, but there was little statistical evidence of interaction with any of these factors.

Discussion

We investigated whether differences in circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D3 at the time of diagnosis of RCC were associated with all-cause and RCC-specific survival. We observed that higher concentrations of 25(OH)D3 were associated with a lower rate of death, but that this association was not restricted to RCC specific death. We also observed an indication that this association might be somewhat stronger for those with a history of hypertension, advanced age at diagnosis, or early stage disease.

We recently studied circulating 25(OH)D3 and risk of RCC in a prospective case-control study nested within the EPIC cohort [3]. This analysis indicated an inverse association between 25(OH)D3 and risk of RCC as well as a non-linear U-shaped association between pre-diagnostic 25(OH)D3 and all-cause mortality after diagnosis of RCC. This observation prompted us to conduct the current analysis in newly diagnosed RCC cases with complete information on disease stage and cause of death. Results from the present study are not completely consistent with these initial findings from EPIC. In particular, we found no evidence of increased rate of death among patients with high 25(OH)D3 at diagnosis, but rather an inverse association between 25(OH)D3 and all-cause mortality across the range of observed concentrations.

Many studies have investigated circulating vitamin D and all-cause mortality in general populations. Consistent with our observation, many of these have reported high risk of death for people with low concentrations [1219], suggesting that the association observed in our study might reflect a general phenomenon rather than something specific to RCC prognosis. This would be consistent with our observation that any association might be stronger among those patients diagnosed with early rather than advanced stage tumours. The lack of heterogeneity by cause of death provides additional indirect evidence that the association between vitamin D and mortality is unlikely to exist exclusively among RCC patients.

Circulating vitamin D (measured as 25(OH)D3 in the current study) is converted to its to its active hydroxilated form calcitriol (1,25(OH)D3) in the kidneys. Calcitriol is a potent steroid hormone that has been implicated by in vitro and in vivo models as having anti-cancer influence in a wide range of cancers by affecting multiple cancer hallmarks, including reducing angiogenesis, metastasis, cell invasion, inflammation and proliferation, as well as stimulating apoptosis [20], and through these mechanisms higher concentrations of circulating vitamin D may inhibit tumour progression leading to improved survival. In addition, it is possible that kidney function is affected by the presence of the tumour, which may lead to disregulation of the conversion of circulating vitamin D to calcitriol. The effects of such disregulation on any causal association between vitamin D and RCC prognosis are difficult to predict. Given that we observe no evidence of heterogeneity by cause of death, we tentatively infer that circulating vitamin D is not causally associated with RCC tumour progression and prognosis, but is rather an indicator of general health status.

One limitation of our study is that we were unable to adjust for grade, which was unavailable for a substantial proportion (28%) of participants. Nevertheless, given that our results do not differ by cause of death, we consider it unlikely that tumour grade is an important confounder or effect modifier. Another limitation of our study is that we did not have information regarding the use of vitamin D supplements, though it is unlikely that supplement use was highly prevalent given that 25(OH)D2 concentrations were undetectable for the majority of participants. It is also possible that these results may not generalise beyond Central and Eastern European populations, but the remarkable consistency with results observed in non-clinical cohort studies suggests that that our results will generalise well, at least to a broader population of European origin.

In summary, we found that high 25(OH)D3 at diagnosis of RCC was associated with lower risk of death. This association was not restricted to RCC cause-specific death, and appeared stronger for early stage disease, supporting the notion of 25(OH)D3 being associated with lower overall death rates in general, rather than RCC prognosis specifically.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Acknowledgments

Financial support: M. Johansson received a grant from World Cancer Research Fund (UK) which supported the biochemical analyses. This work was also supported by a grant from the NCI (U01-CA155309) to G. Scelo. The work undertaken by D.C. Muller that was reported in this paper was done so during the tenure of an IARC-Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, supported by the Cancer Council Australia.

Funding: The World Cancer Research Fund (UK) supported the biochemical analyses via a grant to M. Johansson. This work was also supported by a grant from the NCI (U01-CA155309) to G. Scelo. The funding organization had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The work undertaken by D.C. Muller that was reported in this paper was done so during the tenure of an IARC-Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, supported by the Cancer Council Australia.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to declare.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer. 2013 Apr;49:1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cancer Research UK. Statistics and outlook for kidney cancer [Website] 2014 [cited 2014 May 28]. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/type/kidney-cancer/treatment/statistics-and-outlookfor-kidney-cancer#stage.
  • 3.Muller DC, Fanidi A, Midttun Ø, Steffen A, Dossus L, Boutron-Ruault MC, et al. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in Relation to Renal Cell Carcinoma Incidence and Survival in the EPIC Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2014 Oct;180:810–20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gallicchio L, Moore LE, Stevens VL, Ahn J, Albanes D, Hartmuller V, et al. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Kidney Cancer Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;172:47–57. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Joh HK, Giovannucci EL, Bertrand KA, Lim S, Cho E. Predicted Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Renal Cell Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013 May;105:726–732. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Midttun Ø, Ueland PM. Determination of vitamins A, D and E in a small volume of human plasma by a high-throughput method based on liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2011 Jul;25:1942–8. doi: 10.1002/rcm.5073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lunn M, McNeil D. Applying Cox Regression to Competing Risks. Biometrics. 1995 Jun;51:524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika. 1986 Apr;73:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barlow WE. Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50:1064–1072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, Izumi S. Analysis of Case-Cohort Designs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1999 Dec;52:1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00102-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schöttker B, Haug U, Schomburg L, Köhrle J, Perna L, Müller H, et al. Strong associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality in a large cohort study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013 Apr;97:782–793. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.047712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Virtanen JK, Nurmi T, Voutilainen S, Mursu J, Tuomainen TP. Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with the risk of death in a general older population in Finland. European Journal of Nutrition. 2011 Aug;50:305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00394-010-0138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hutchinson MS, Grimnes G, Joakimsen RM, Figenschau Y, Jorde R. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in a general population: the Tromsøstudy. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2010 May;162:935–942. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Szulc P, Claustrat B, Delmas PD. Serum concentrations of 17β-E2 and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25OHD) in relation to all-cause mortality in older men – the MINOS study. Clinical Endocrinology. 2009;71:594–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Semba RD, Houston DK, Ferrucci L, Cappola AR, Sun K, Guralnik JM, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with greater all-cause mortality in older community-dwelling women. Nutrition Research. 2009 Aug;29:525–530. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pilz S, Dobnig H, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Stehouwer CDA, Snijder MB, et al. Vitamin D and mortality in older men and women. Clinical Endocrinology. 2009;71:666–672. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Melamed ML, Michos ED, Post W, Astor B. 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008 Aug;168:1629–1637. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jia X, Aucott LS, McNeill G. Nutritional status and subsequent all-cause mortality in men and women aged 75 years or over living in the community. British Journal of Nutrition. 2007;98:593–599. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507725163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E, Feldman BJ. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2014 May;14:342–357. doi: 10.1038/nrc3691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES