Abstract
ABO blood groups are known to influence the plasma level of von Willebrand factor (VWF), but little is known about the relationship between ABO and coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). We analyzed the influence of ABO genotypes on VWF antigen, FVIII activity, and their quantitative relationship in 11,673 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. VWF, FVIII, and FVIII/VWF levels varied significantly among O, A (A1 and A2), B and AB subjects, and the extent of which varied between Americans of European (EA) and African (AA) descent. We validated a strong influence of ABO blood type on VWF levels (15.2%), but also detected a direct ABO influence on FVIII activity (0.6%) and FVIII/VWF ratio (3.8%) after adjustment for VWF. We determined that FVIII activity changed 0.54% for every 1% change in VWF antigen level. This VWF-FVIII relationship differed between subjects with O and B blood types in EA, AA, and in male, but not female subjects. Variations in FVIII activity were primarily detected at low VWF levels. These new quantitative influences on VWF, FVIII and the FVIII/VWF ratio help understand how ABO genotypes differentially influence VWF, FVIII and their ratio, particularly in racial and gender specific manners.
Introduction
ABO blood group antigens present on red blood cells are an important determinant of transfusion compatibility. By modifying carbohydrate side chains of soluble and membrane-bound proteins, they are also involved in physiologic and pathologic processes. ABO blood types have been associated with the development of coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism [1–3], in part by regulating levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in the circulation [4;5]. A recent genome wide association study by the CHARGE consortium shows that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the strongest association with VWF levels and FVIII activity are in the ABO locus [4].
VWF is synthesized as a pre-pro-polypeptide monomer of 2,813 amino acids [6]. Each VWF monomer contains 12 potential N- glycosylation and 10 O-glycosylation sites [7], some that are modified by ABO determinants [8;9]. ABO was originally detected on N-linked glycans of VWF [8–10], accounting for up to 13% of the N-linked oligosaccharide chains of VWF multimers in the circulation [8;11]. In addition, a recent study also identified 3 O-linked glycans on VWF that are modified by ABO [12]. The life-span of circulating VWF is known to be influenced by ABO [5;13–16].
Although impacts of ABO on plasma levels and adhesive activity of VWF are well documented, critically important questions remain. First, is the impact of ABO on levels of VWF antigen modified by gender and race? Second, is there a direct ABO influence on FVIII activity that is independent of VWF? A relatively weak VWF-independent impact of ABO on FVIII has previously been reported [17;18], but the size and racial differences of this effect are unknown. Without defining this VWF independent effect, it is difficult to answer the question of whether ABO has a direct or indirect effect on the FVIII/VWF ratio, which is widely used to evaluate VWF synthesis and its defects in clinical settings [17]. Finally, is the ABO effect modified by environmental factors known to affect plasma VWF? We have analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study [19–21] to answer these questions. We have previously used this database to determine that ABO accounts for 15.4% and 10.7% of the variability of plasma VWF antigen and FVIII activity in a cohort of 10,434 subjects of European (EA) and African (AA) descents [19;20]. Here, we present data from a cross-sectional study of 11,673 ARIC subjects designed to examine 1) VWF-dependent and independent influences of ABO on FVIII activity and the FVIII-VWF ratio and 2) gender, racial, and environmental modifications of these influences.
Materials and Methods
Study population and baseline measurements
ARIC (www.cscc.unc.edu/aric/) is a prospective epidemiologic study conducted in four
US communities, designed to investigate the etiology and natural history of atherosclerosis and clinical atherosclerotic diseases, as well as variation in cardiovascular risk factors, medical care, and disease by race, gender, location, and date [22;23]. To examine the intrinsic effects of ABO on VWF and FVIII, adjustments were made for covariates known to affect VWF antigen and FVIII activity in the circulation; including age, race, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes and history of smoking [24;25]. The use of the ARIC data was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions for the ARIC study.
VWF antigen levels and FVIII activity were measured as previously described [19;20]. The reliability coefficient (1 –intra-individual variance/total variance) obtained from repeat testing of individuals over several weeks was 0.68 for VWF and 0.86 for FVIII.
ABO genotyping
ABO was genotyped using two SNPs: RS8176719 and RS8176746 (S1 Table). Subjects were classified as type O (OO), type A (AA or AO), type B (BB or BO) or type AB (AB) using these two SNPs. The A subjects were further genotyped as A1 (including A1O), A1A2, and A2 (including A2O) using haplotypes from the ABO SNPs rs8176749, rs8176704 and rs687289 [26].
Statistical analysis
Distributions of VWF levels and FVIII activity were evaluated to assess normality. Since distributions of the two factors were highly skewed, a natural log transformation was performed prior to regression analysis. The simple linear and multiple linear regression models and the least square regression plots were used to investigate relations among VWF levels, FVIII activity, and the FVIII/VWF ratio. Omega squared (ω2) and semipartial ω2 were calculated to evaluate effect sizes of the model and individual factors on FVIII activity and FVIII/VWF ratio, respectively. For assessing difference between groups, analysis of variance (ANOVA) or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed. Multiple comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method and p < 0.0045 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) or R 2.13.2.
Results
Baseline characteristics
A total of 11,673 ARIC subjects were included in this cross-sectional study, comprised of 8,817 EA and 2,856 AA subjects. The features and potential confounding characteristics of this demographic are summarized in Table 1. The distribution of ABO blood groups was consistent with previous reports [24]. Among covariates known to affect VWF levels in the circulation, diabetes and hypertension were more common in subjects with type B blood. The B type subjects also had the highest BMI.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects in Each ABO Blood Group ‡ .
| ABO blood group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Total | O | A1 | A1A2 | A2 | B | AB | P value |
| N | 11,673 | |||||||
| † Age: mean (SD) | 54.0 (5.7) | 53.9 (5.7) | 54.2 (5.7) | 54.2 (5.6) | 54.0 (5.7) | 54.0 (5.8) | 53.7 (5.8) | 0.41* |
| AA Female | 1,787 | 901 (50.4%) | 320 (17.9%) | 17 (1.0%) | 150 (8.4%) | 328 (18.4%) | 71 (4.0%) | |
| AA Male | 1,069 | 558 (52.2%) | 157 (14.7%) | 11 (1.0%) | 67 (6.3%) | 230 (21.5%) | 46 (3.0%) | |
| EA Female | 4,688 | 1,880 (40.1%) | 1,644 (35.1%) | 131 (2.8%) | 401 (8.6%) | 443 (9.4%) | 189 (4.0%) | |
| EA Male | 4,129 | 1,666 (40.3%) | 1,358 (32.9%) | 130 (3.1%) | 407 (9.9% | 397 (9.6%) | 171 (4.1%) | |
| BMI: mean (SD) | 27.6 (5.3) | 27.8 (5.4) | 27.2 (5.0) | 27.3 (4.8) | 27.5 (4.8) | 28.0 (5.6) | 27.8 (5.5) | <0.0001* |
| Ever smoking | 6,810 (58.4%) | 2,874 (57.5%) | 2,036 (58.5%) | 188 (65.1%) | 617 (60.4%) | 807 (57.8%) | 288 (60.4%) | 0.08** |
| Hypertension | 3,907 (33.6%) | 1,730 (34.8%) | 1,076 (31.1%) | 78 (27.1%) | 330 (32.4%) | 542 (38.9%) | 151 (31.9% | <0.0001** |
| Diabetes | 1,281 (11.0%) | 548 (11.0%) | 345 (9.9%) | 31 (10.7%) | 101 (9.9%) | 204 (14.7%) | 52 (10.9%) | 0.0002** |
‡11,673 subjects were included in the study, but for covariates the numbers of subjects were 11,661 for BMI
† Age at baseline visit
* Analysis of variance
** Chi-square test
Influence of ABO on VWF and FVIII
VWF levels were the highest in subjects with either B or AB blood group, whereas they were the lowest in O subjects in all four gender-by-race groups (Table 2). The difference in VWF antigen levels among the six ABO blood groups remained statistically significant after adjustment for environmental covariates (Table 2, second rows). The overall difference in the mean VWF antigen between type O subjects and those with B blood group was 31.7%. This difference was significantly greater for AA subjects (32.3% and 32.5% for females and males, respectively) than for EA subjects (29.8% and 29.1% for females and males, respectively, P < 0.001). Although genotyped as A and B subjects, VWF antigen levels were 123 ± 45% and 135 ± 46% for AO and BO subjects, significantly lower than those with homozygous for A (144 ± 52%, p<0.0001) and B alleles (160 ± 53%, p = 0.0042), respectively. Furthermore, VWF levels differed significantly among A1, A1A2, and A2 genotypes overall and for all 8 gender-by-race groups (p < 0.0001).
Table 2. Geometric Mean (95% CI) of VWF Level (%) in ABO Blood Groups*.
| Stratum | O | A1 | A1A2 | A2 | B | AB | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.2 (91.3, 93.1) | 124.6 (123.1, 126) | 119.8 (115.0, 124.7) | 119.8 (115.0, 124.7) | 137 (134.5, 139.6) | 132.3 (128.2, 136.5) | <0.0001 |
| 95.2 (94.2, 96.1) | 132.1 (130.5, 133.8) | 127.6 (122.7, 132.6) | 100.1 (98.1, 102.2) | 138.3 (135.9, 140.8) | 138.0 (133.9, 142.2) | <0.0001 | |
| AA | 103.5 (101.6, 105.5) | 144.7 (139.9, 149.6) | 144.6 (126.0, 166.1) | 111.8 (106.4, 117.5) | 156.5 (151.7, 161.4) | 156.3 (146.1, 167.2) | <0.0001 |
| 103.4 (101.5, 105.4) | 143.1 (138.5, 148.0) | 145.7 (127.3, 166.7) | 111.2 (105.8, 116.8) | 155.8 (151.1, 160.7) | 155.5 (145.4, 166.3) | <0.0001 | |
| EA | 87.9 (86.9, 88.8) | 121.6 (120.2, 123.1) | 117.4 (112.8, 122.2) | 91.7 (89.6, 93.8) | 125.5 (122.7, 128.3) | 125.3 (121.1, 129.7) | <0.0001 |
| 87.8 (86.9, 88.8) | 121.7 (120.3, 123.1) | 116.8 (112.3, 121.4) | 91.7 (89.7, 93.8) | 124.9 (122.2, 127.6) | 125.8 (121.7, 130.0) | <0.0001 | |
| Female | 91.8 (90.6, 93.0) | 124.3 (122.4, 126.2) | 122.9 (116.1, 130.1) | 95.7 (92.9, 98.6) | 137.9 (134.5, 141.4) | 132.7 (127.1, 138.5) | <0.0001 |
| 94.4 (93.3, 95.7) | 131.8 (129.7, 133.9) | 131.6 (124.8, 138.9) | 99.2 (96.5, 102.0) | 139.0 (135.8, 142.3) | 137.6 (132.2, 143.3) | <0.0001 | |
| Male | 92.7 (91.3, 94.0) | 124.9 (122.7, 127.1) | 116.6 (110.1, 123.5) | 95.5 (92.6, 98.6) | 136.0 (132.3, 139.7) | 131.8 (125.9, 138.1) | <0.0001 |
| 96.1 (94.7, 97.6) | 132.4 (129.9, 135.0) | 123.7 (117.0, 130.8) | 101.3 (98.2, 104.5) | 137.5 (133.9, 141.1) | 138.5 (132.4, 144.9) | <0.0001 | |
| AA female | 104.7 (102.1, 107.2) | 147.1 (141.2, 153.2) | 149.7 (125.4, 178.8) | 112.5 (106.0, 119.5) | 158.5 (152.2, 165.1) | 159.2 (146.0, 173.7) | <0.0001 |
| 105.0 (102.6, 107.6) | 145.5 (139.8, 151.4) | 153.1 (128.8, 182.0) | 112.8 (106.4, 119.7) | 159.3 (153.1, 165.7) | 157.1 (144.2, 171.2) | <0.0001 | |
| AA male | 101.7 (98.6, 104.9) | 140.0 (132.1, 148.4) | 137.1 (110.0, 170.9) | 110.2 (100.8, 120.5) | 151.9 (136.3, 169.1) | 153.6 (146.4, 161.2) | <0.0001 |
| 101.9 (98.8, 105.0) | 140.6 (132.7, 149.0) | 136.3 (109.7, 169.3) | 110.1 (100.8, 120.2) | 151.8 (144.7, 159.3) | 153.9 (138.2, 171.3) | <0.0001 | |
| EA female | 86.2 (84.9, 87.5) | 120.3 (118.4, 122.2) | 119.8 (113.2, 126.7) | 90.1 (87.2, 93.1) | 124.4 (120.6, 128.3) | 123.9 (118.2, 129.9) | <0.0001 |
| 86.3 (85.0, 87.5) | 120.4 (118.5, 122.2) | 119.1 (112.9, 125.7) | 89.7 (87.0, 92.5) | 124.1 (120.5, 127.7) | 124.4 (118.9, 130.1) | <0.0001 | |
| EA male | 89.8 (88.4, 91.3) | 123.3 (121.1, 125.5) | 115.0 (108.6, 121.8) | 93.3 (90.3, 96.4) | 126.7 (122.6, 131.0) | 126.9 (120.7, 133.4) | <0.0001 |
| 89.6 (88.2, 91.0) | 123.2 (121.1, 125.3) | 114.8 (108.6, 121.3) | 93.9 (91.0, 96.9) | 125.8 (121.9, 129.9) | 127.6 (121.5, 133.9) | <0.0001 |
* For all strata, top rows: unadjusted values and bottom rows: values adjusted for age, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension (race and gender were also included for overall population; race in the gender-specific analyses and gender in the race-specific analyses)
Consistent with VWF distribution, FVIII activity was also the lowest in subjects with blood group O and highest in those with either B or AB before and after adjustment for environmental factors (Table 3). Overall, type O subjects had a mean FVIII activity that was 76.7% of those with blood type B, and further analyses indicate a significant racial, but not gender dependent difference between O and B subjects (p < 0.001). The overall difference between the highest and lowest FVIII activity (O vs. B or AB) was reduced from 23.3% to 6.2% after adjustment for VWF (Table 3, second rows). This reduction was similarly observed in all four gender-by-race groups. FVIII activity was significantly different among subjects with A1, A1A2, and A2 genotypes, but further gender-by-race group analyses found that the difference was found only in EA, but not in AA subjects of both genders after the values were adjusted for not only environmental factors, but also for VWF (Table 4).
Table 3. Geometric Mean (95% CI) of FVIII Activity (%) in ABO Blood Groups*.
| Stratum | O | A1 | A1A2 | A2 | B | AB | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112.4 (111.6, 113.3) | 136.1 (134.9, 137.2) | 130.7 (126.8, 134.8) | 115.8 (113.9, 117.6) | 146.5 (144.5, 148.6) | 142.4 (139.1, 145.8) | <0.0001 | |
| Overall | 115.2 (114.4, 116.0) | 142.7 (141.5, 144.0) | 138.1 (134.3, 142.1) | 120.3 (118.5, 122.1) | 147.0 (145.1, 148.9) | 147.4 (144.2, 150.7) | <0.0001 |
| 122.5 (121.8, 123.2) | 129.8 (128.9, 130.8) | 127.7 (125.0, 130.5) | 124.9 (123.4, 126.3) | 130.8 (129.5, 132.2) | 131.3 (129.1, 133.5) | <0.0001 | |
| 125.1 (123.3, 126.9) | 156.2 (152.4, 160.1) | 154.7 (139.6, 171.5) | 129.8 (125.1, 134.7) | 165.1 (161.3, 168.9) | 167.6 (159.4, 176.2) | <0.0001 | |
| AA | 124.8 (123.1, 126.5) | 154.2 (150.5, 158.0) | 154.6 (140.2, 170.5) | 129.1 (124.6, 133.8) | 164.1 (160.5, 167.8) | 167.0 (159.1, 175.3) | <0.0001 |
| 135.4 (134.0, 136.8) | 142.3 (139.8, 144.8) | 141.4 (131.7, 151.8) | 135.1 (131.7, 138.7) | 145.2 (142.7, 147.6) | 147.9 (142.7, 153.2) | <0.0001 | |
| 107.6 (106.8, 108.5) | 133.1 (131.9, 134.3) | 128.4 (124.6, 132.3) | 112.3 (110.4, 114.2) | 135.4 (133.1, 137.6) | 135.1 (131.7, 138.6) | <0.0001 | |
| EA | 107.4 (106.6, 108.2) | 132.9 (131.8, 134.0) | 128.0 (124.5, 131.7) | 112.2 (110.4, 114.1) | 134.6 (132.4, 136.7) | 135.3 (132.1, 138.6) | <0.0001 |
| 116.4 (115.6, 117.1) | 123.6 (122.8, 124.5) | 121.5 (118.8, 124.1) | 119.2 (117.7, 120.7) | 123.7 (122.2, 125.2) | 124.0 (121.7, 126.3) | <0.0001 | |
| 114.6 (113.5, 115.7) | 139.3 (137.7, 140.9) | 137.0 (131.3, 142.9) | 118.7 (116.1, 121.4) | 149.4 (146.6, 152.2) | 146.4 (141.8, 151.2) | <0.0001 | |
| Female | 117.0 (115.9, 118.1) | 145.7 (144.1, 147.4) | 144.7 (139.2, 150.5) | 122.1 (119.6, 124.6) | 149.8 (147.2, 152.3) | 150.8 (146.4, 155.3) | <0.0001 |
| 124.7 (123.8, 125.7) | 132.9 (131.7, 134.1) | 132.1 (128.2, 136.1) | 127.2 (125.2, 129.2) | 133.2 (131.5, 135.0) | 134.8 (131.8, 137.9) | <0.0001 | |
| 109.8 (108.6, 111.0) | 132.0 (130.2, 133.7) | 124.5 (119.3, 129.9) | 112.4 (109.8, 115.1) | 143.1 (140.2, 146.0) | 137.8 (133.2, 142.7) | <0.0001 | |
| Male | 113.5 (112.3, 114.8) | 139.7 (137.7, 141.7) | 131.8 (126.5, 137.3) | 118.6 (115.9, 121.4) | 144.3 (141.5, 147.1) | 143.9 (139.3, 148.8) | <0.0001 |
| 120.3 (119.3, 121.4) | 126.7 (125.3, 128.1) | 123.5 (119.8, 127.4) | 122.5 (120.5, 124.7) | 128.5 (126.6, 130.4) | 127.7 (124.6, 131.0) | <0.0001 | |
| 127.6 (125.3, 130.0) | 160.8 (156.0, 165.8) | 157.7 (138.2, 180.0) | 131.4 (125.7, 137.4) | 168.2 (163.2, 173.3) | 172.0 (161.3, 183.5) | <0.0001 | |
| AA female | 128.2 (126.0, 130.4) | 159.0 (154.4, 163.7) | 159.3 (140.5, 180.5) | 132.0 (126.5, 137.8) | 169.9 (159.7, 180.8) | 169.0 (164.2, 173.9) | <0.0001 |
| 138.5 (136.6, 140.4) | 146.8 (143.6, 150.1) | 143.5 (130.7, 157.6) | 137.8 (133.5, 142.2) | 149.4 (146.1, 152.8) | 151.2 (144.3, 158.4) | <0.0001 | |
| 121.0 (118.3, 123.8) | 147.2 (141.0, 153.6) | 150.2 (127.8, 176.6) | 126.4 (118.3, 134.9) | 160.8 (155.2, 166.6) | 161.0 (148.7, 174.2) | <0.0001 | |
| AA male | 121.3 (118.6, 124.0) | 148.4 (142.4, 154.8) | 148.8 (127.2, 174.1) | 127.0 (119.1, 135.4) | 158.7 (153.3, 164.4) | 163.6 (151.3, 176.8) | <0.0001 |
| 131.8 (129.7, 133.9) | 136.1 (132.2, 140.1) | 138.7 (124.5, 154.4) | 132.5 (126.8, 138.5) | 139.8 (136.3, 143.3) | 143.0 (135.5, 150.9) | 0.0021 | |
| 108.8 (107.6, 110.0) | 135.5 (133.9, 137.1) | 134.5 (129.0, 140.2) | 114.3 (111.6, 117.1) | 136.8 (133.7, 139.9) | 137.8 (133.1, 142.7) | <0.0001 | |
| EA female | 108.8 (107.7, 110.0) | 135.4 (134.0, 137.0) | 134.2 (129.0, 139.5) | 114.0 (111.4, 116.5) | 136.4 (133.5, 139.3) | 138.6 (134.1, 143.2) | <0.0001 |
| 118.2 (117.2, 119.2) | 126.1 (125.0, 127.2) | 125.5 (121.8, 129.4) | 121.5 (119.4, 123.7) | 125.2 (123.1, 127.3) | 127.1 (123.9, 130.4) | <0.0001 | |
| 106.3 (105.0, 107.5) | 130.3 (128.6, 132.0) | 122.5 (117.4, 127.8) | 110.3 (107.7, 112.9) | 133.8 (130.6, 137.1) | 132.2 (127.4, 137.2) | <0.0001 | |
| EA male | 106.1 (104.9, 107.3) | 130.4 (128.7, 132.0) | 122.4 (117.5, 127.5) | 110.6 (108.1, 113.2) | 132.8 (129.8, 136.0) | 132.4 (127.7, 137.2) | <0.0001 |
| 114.7 (113.6, 115.7) | 121.3 (120.0, 122.5) | 117.7 (114.0, 121.4) | 116.9 (114.9, 119.1) | 122.3 (120.1, 124.6) | 121.1 (117.8, 124.5) | <0.0001 |
* Top rows: unadjusted values; mid-rows (light grey): adjusted for age, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension; bottom rows (dark grey): adjusted for model 2 covariates and VWF
Table 4. Geometric Mean (95% CI) of FVIII Activity (%) in A Blood Groups*.
| Stratum | A1 | A1A2 | A2 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 142.7 (141.5, 144.0) | 138.1 (134.3, 142.1) | 120.3 (118.5, 122.1) | <0.0001 |
| 129.8 (128.9, 130.8) | 127.7 (125.0, 130.5) | 124.9 (123.4, 126.3) | <0.0001 | |
| AA | 154.2 (150.5, 158.0) | 154.6 (140.2, 170.5) | 129.1 (124.6, 133.8) | <0.0001 |
| 142.3 (139.8, 144.8) | 141.4 (131.7, 151.8) | 135.1 (131.7, 138.7) | 0.010 | |
| EA | 132.9 (131.8, 134.0) | 128.0 (124.5, 131.7) | 112.2 (110.4, 114.1) | <0.0001 |
| 123.6 (122.8, 124.5) | 121.5 (118.8, 124.1) | 119.2 (117.7, 120.7) | <0.0001 | |
| Female | 145.7 (144.1, 147.4) | 144.7 (139.2, 150.5) | 122.1 (119.6, 124.6) | <0.0001 |
| 132.9 (131.7, 134.1) | 132.1 (128.2, 136.1) | 127.2 (125.2, 129.2) | <0.0001 | |
| Male | 139.7 (137.7, 141.7) | 131.8 (126.5, 137.3) | 118.6 (115.9, 121.4) | <0.0001 |
| 126.7 (125.3, 128.1) | 123.5 (119.8, 127.4) | 122.5 (120.5, 124.7) | 0.001 | |
| AA female | 159.0 (154.4, 163.7) | 159.3 (140.5, 180.5) | 132.0 (126.5, 137.8) | <0.0001 |
| 146.8 (143.6, 150.1) | 143.5 (130.7, 157.6) | 137.8 (133.5, 142.2) | 0.0068 | |
| AA male | 148.4 (142.4, 154.8) | 148.8 (127.2, 174.1) | 127.0 (119.1, 135.4) | 0.0006 |
| 136.1 (132.2, 140.1) | 138.7 (124.5, 154.4) | 132.5 (126.8, 138.5) | 0.72 | |
| EA female | 135.4 (134.0, 137.0) | 134.2 (129.0, 139.5) | 114.0 (111.4, 116.5) | <0.0001 |
| 126.1 (125.0, 127.2) | 125.5 (121.8, 129.4) | 121.5 (119.4, 123.7) | 0.0005 | |
| EA male | 130.4 (128.7, 132.0) | 122.4 (117.5, 127.5) | 110.6 (108.1, 113.2) | <0.0001 |
| 121.3 (120.0, 122.5) | 117.7 (114.0, 121.4) | 116.9 (114.9, 119.1) | 0.0008 |
* Top row: values adjusted for age, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension and bottom row (shaded): values adjusted for environmental factors as in top row, but also for VWF
We have previously shown that ABO contributes to 10.7% of FVIII variability before adjustment for VWF [22], and this study further found that the level of influence was reduced to 0.6% after the VWF adjustment (Table 5, left column). These data are consistent with a strong VWF influence on the variability of FVIII activity in the plasma (quantified to be 35.5%), but also demonstrated a small, but significant VWF-independent influence. We have previously shown that age and BMI contributed to 4.39% and 1.61% of VWF variability [20], but their influences on variability of FVIII activity and FVIII/VWF ratio were minimal (Table 5). So were hypertension, diabetes, and ever smoking status. Race and gender together accounted for 1.15% and 0.83% of variability of FVIII and FVIII/VWF ratio.
Table 5. Effect Size (%) of Covariates for FVIII activity and FVIII/VWF ratio.
| Semipartial ω2 (%)* | ||
|---|---|---|
| Predictor | FVIII activity a | FVIII/VWF ratio b |
| ABO | 0.83 | 5.00 |
| VWF | 30.82 | |
| Age | 0.06 | 1.13 |
| BMI | 0.16 | 0.04 |
| Hypertension | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Diabetes | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| Ever smoking | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| Race & gender | 1.15 | 0.83 |
* Semipartial ω2 is the proportion of variability explained by each factor.
a Model was defined as log FVIII = log VWF + ABO + environmental covariates (age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, ever smoking status, and combination of race and gender).
b Model was defined as log FVIII/VWF ratio = ABO + environmental covariates (age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, ever smoking status, and combination of race and gender).
Association of ABO with FVIII/VWF ratio
The mean FVIII/VWF ratio was examined among the six ABO blood groups (Table 6). Subjects with O blood group had a significantly higher FVIII/VWF ratio followed by those with A, B, or AB blood group, before and after adjustment for environmental covariates. Similar to FVIII activity, difference among A1, A1A2, and A2 subjects did not reach statistical significance in AA subjects after the Bonferroni correction (data now shown). Quantitatively, ABO contributed 5% of the variability of the FVIII/VWF ratio (Table 5, right column), whereas environmental covariates minimally influenced it.
Table 6. Geometric Mean (95% CI) of FVIII/VWF Ratio in ABO Blood Groups*.
| Stratum | O | A1 | A1A2 | A2 | B | AB | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.22 (1.21, 1.23) | 1.09 (1.08, 1.10) | 1.09 (1.06, 1.12) | 1.21 (1.19, 1.23) | 1.07 (1.06, 1.08) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.10) | <0.0001 |
| 1.21 (1.20, 1.22) | 1.08 (1.07, 1.09) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) | 1.20 (1.18, 1.22) | 1.06 (1.05, 1.08) | 1.07 (1.04, 1.09) | <0.0001 | |
| AA | 1.21 (1.19, 1.22) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) | 1.07 (0.97, 1.18) | 1.16 (1.12, 1.20) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.08) | 1.07 (1.02, 1.13) | <0.0001 |
| 1.21 (1.19, 1.22) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.10) | 1.06 (0.96, 1.17) | 1.16 (1.12, 1.20) | 1.05 (1.03, 1.08) | 1.07 (1.02, 1.13) | <0.0001 | |
| EA | 1.22 (1.21, 1.23) | 1.09 (1.08, 1.10) | 1.09 (1.06, 1.13) | 1.22 (1.20, 1.25) | 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) | <0.0001 |
| 1.22 (1.21, 1.23) | 1.09 (1.08, 1.10) | 1.10 (1.06, 1.13) | 1.22 (1.20, 1.24) | 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) | 1.08 (1.05, 1.10) | <0.0001 | |
| Female | 1.25 (1.24, 1.26) | 1.12 (1.11, 1.13) | 1.11 (1.07, 1.16) | 1.24 (1.21, 1.27) | 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) | 1.10 (1.07, 1.14) | <0.0001 |
| 1.24 (1.23, 1.25) | 1.11 (1.09, 1.12) | 1.10 (1.06, 1.15) | 1.23 (1.20, 1.26) | 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) | 1.10 (1.06, 1.13) | <0.0001 | |
| Male | 1.18 (1.17, 1.20) | 1.06 (1.04, 1.07) | 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) | 1.18 (1.15, 1.20) | 1.05 (1.03, 1.07) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.08) | <0.0001 |
| 1.18 (1.17, 1.19) | 1.05 (1.04, 1.07) | 1.06 (1.02, 1.11) | 1.17 (1.14, 1.20) | 1.05 (1.03, 1.07) | 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) | <0.0001 | |
| AA female | 1.22 (1.20, 1.24) | 1.09 (1.06, 1.13) | 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) | 1.17 (1.12, 1.22) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) | 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) | <0.0001 |
| 1.22 (1.20, 1.24) | 1.09 (1.06, 1.13) | 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) | 1.17 (1.12, 1.22) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) | 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) | <0.0001 | |
| AA male | 1.19 (1.17, 1.22) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) | 1.10 (0.94, 1.27) | 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.08) | 1.06 (0.99, 1.14) | <0.0001 |
| 1.19 (1.17, 1.22) | 1.06 (1.01, 1.10) | 1.09 (0.94, 1.27) | 1.15 (1.09, 1.23) | 1.05 (1.01, 1.08) | 1.06 (0.99, 1.14) | <0.0001 | |
| EA female | 1.26 (1.25, 1.28) | 1.13 (1.11, 1.14) | 1.12 (1.08, 1.17) | 1.27 (1.24, 1.30) | 1.10 (1.07, 1.13) | 1.11 (1.07, 1.15) | <0.0001 |
| 1.26 (1.25, 1.28) | 1.13 (1.11, 1.14) | 1.13 (1.08, 1.17) | 1.27 (1.24, 1.30) | 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.11 (1.08, 1.15) | <0.0001 | |
| EA male | 1.18 (1.17, 1.20) | 1.06 (1.04, 1.07) | 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) | 1.18 (1.15, 1.21) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.08) | 1.04 (1.00, 1.08) | <0.0001 |
| 1.18 (1.17, 1.20) | 1.06 (1.04, 1.07) | 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) | 1.18 (1.15, 1.21) | 1.04 (1.00, 1.08) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.08) | <0.0001 |
Top row: unadjusted values; bottom row (shaded): values adjusted for age, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension (race and gender were also included for overall population; race in the gender-specific analyses and gender in the race-specific analyses)
Interaction between VWF and FVIII
FVIII activity and VWF antigen level correlated well for the entire cohort (S1 Fig) and for four race-by-gender groups (S2 Fig, A1, A1A2, and A2 subjects were analyzed together), with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.57 to 0.79. To delineate a quantitative relation between VWF and FVIII and understand how race and gender may modify this relationship, we plotted log VWF level and log FVIII activity on a coordinated plane. The least-squares trend line suggests an overall linear relationship between the two measurements (R2 = 0.54, S1 Fig): there was a 0.54% change in FVIII activity for every 1% change in VWF antigen level. This VWF-FVIII relationship had significantly different slopes between subjects with O and B blood groups for EA, AA, and male, but not female subjects (Table 7). These different slopes resulted in variations in FVIII activity among ABO groups primarily detected at low VWF levels.
Table 7. Relationship between log FVIII and log VWF in homozygous ABO types*.
| Subject | Slope | Adjusted p value for interaction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | A1 | A2 | B | ||
| Overall | 0.484 | 0.451 | 0.485 | 0.448 | 0.0025 |
| AA | 0.515 | 0.473 | 0.530 | 0.458 | 0.04 |
| EA | 0.488 | 0.447 | 0.479 | 0.419 | 0.001 |
| Female | 0.486 | 0.445 | 0.481 | 0.452 | 0.12 |
| Male | 0.509 | 0.458 | 0.486 | 0.442 | 0.005 |
* p-values for comparisons between slopes for O and B blood groups.
Models adjusted for age, smoking, BMI, diabetes, and hypertension (race and gender were also included for overall population; race in the gender-specific analyses and gender in the race-specific analyses).
Discussion
While the influence of ABO on VWF has been extensively studied and widely reported, we have provided quantitative data on the association of ABO with FVIII activity, its modification by VWF, and the FVIII/VWF ratio. The large sample size allowed us to conduct racial and gender subgroup analyses that have not previously been done due to smaller sample sizes. We also examined the quantitative relationship between VWF level and FVIII activity. Consistent with previous reports [24;27], we detected a significant influence of ABO on VWF levels, accounting for 15.2% of overall VWF variability. VWF antigen also differed among A1, A1A2, and A2 subjects. VWF antigen was the lowest in subjects with O blood groups and highest in those with either B or AB blood groups. A significant ABO dose effect on VWF level was detected between AA and AO as well as BB and BO genotypes. In addition to validation of previous findings in smaller samples, we made several novel observations on quantitative impacts on how ABO influenced VWF, FVIII and their ratio.
First, the impact of ABO on VWF has been well documented and reaffirmed recently by the CHARGE Consortium genome-wide association study [4;7;8]. However, whether ABO influences FVIII through VWF-dependent and/or-independent means remains poorly defined. On one hand, Smith NL, et al [4] suggested that the transport and chaperoning function of VWF for FVIII was responsible for the association between ABO and FVIII activity. This notion is supported by an earlier study of 158 monozygotic and dizygotic twins where the adjustment for VWF level abolished FVIII differences between ABO blood groups [28]. On the other hand, a VWF-independent effect of ABO on FVIII was detected by studying subjects from control and hemophilic families [18;29]. We found that FVIII activity was highest in samples from blood group AB or B subjects and lowest in subjects with O blood group before and after adjustment for environmental covariates. This distribution was in parallel with the VWF distribution among the six blood groups, but the influence of ABO on FVIII variability was reduced from 10.7% to 0.6% after adjustment for VWF. This suggests that ABO influences FVIII activity primarily, but not exclusively through VWF. The dominant VWF influence was calculated to contribute 30.8% of the FVIII variability (Table 5). The finding also suggests that the ABO modified FVIII, but at a significantly lower level.
Second, the FVIII/VWF ratio is widely used as a means to analyze concordance between FVIII and VWF in the circulation as well as a marker for VWF synthesis [25]. Here, we further quantified the ABO contribution to the variability of the FVIII/VWF ratio to be 5%, which is significantly smaller than the influence of ABO on VWF level (15.2%), but much greater than the impact on FVIII activity (0.6%).
Third, plasma VWF antigen (22%-412%) and FVIII activity (20%-540%) varied significantly among ARIC subjects [19;20]. These large variations are likely due to ABO, intrinsic genetic variability, and environmental factors. Because ABO differentially influences VWF and FVIII, we examined a quantitative relationship between these two factors in each of the four ABO blood groups. FVIII activity was linearly associated with VWF in a logarithmic scale, with every 1% change in VWF resulting in a 0.54% change in FVIII. The slope for this linear relationship differed significantly between O and B blood groups for EA, AA, and male subjects, but not for female subjects. This difference in slopes appears to result in a greater variation of FVIII activity among the four blood groups at low VWF levels (Table 7). Although this population study could not determine whether it is required to maintain a constant molar ratio of the two molecules in the circulation, this relationship defines an intrinsic interaction between FVIII and VWF. It is possible that as a known acute phase reactant, environmental changes contribute more to high VWF levels, whereas ABO is a predominant factor in regulating VWF expression in subjects with a low baseline level of VWF.
In summary, we have determined that the influence of ABO on FVIII activity is primarily mediated by VWF, but a small VWF-independent effect (0.6%) was also detected. ABO contributed to 5% variability of the FVIII/VWF ratio. VWF and FVIII are linearly correlated in logarithmic scale, but the relationship between the two factors varied among the four ABO types. These observations provide quantitative insights into how ABO differentially influences VWF, FVIII and the FVIII/VWF ratio and how race and gender modify these influences. The data also suggest that the influence of ABO on FVIII variability may be greater for subjects who have low baseline levels of VWF.
Supporting Information
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts (HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C), R01HL087641, R01HL59367, R01HL086694; HL71895 and HL085769; National Human Genome Research Institute contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health contract HHSN268200625226C. The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. Infrastructure was partly supported by Grant Number UL1RR025005, a component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by research contracts N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, and N01-HC-55022; and Research Grants HL71895 and HL85769 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
References
- 1. Meade TW, Cooper JA, Stirling Y, Howarth DJ, Ruddock V, Miller GJ. Factor VIII, ABO blood group and the incidence of ischaemic heart disease. Br. J. Haematol. 1994;.88:601–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, Hengstenberg C, Mangino M, Mayer B, et al. 2007. Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:443–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ikram MA, Seshadri S, Bis JC, Fornage M, DeStefano AL, Aulchenko YS, et al. 2009. Genomewide association studies of stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 360:1718–1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Smith NL, Chen MH, Dehghan A, Strachan DP, Basu S, Soranzo N, et al. Novel associations of multiple genetic loci with plasma levels of factor VII, factor VIII, and von Willebrand factor: The CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genome Epidemiology) Consortium. Circulation. 2010;121:1382–1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Miller CH, Haff E, Platt SJ, Rawlins P, Drews CD, Dilley AB, Evatt B. Measurement of von Willebrand factor activity: relative effects of ABO blood type and race. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2003;1:2191–2197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sadler JE. Biochemistry and genetics of von Willebrand factor. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998;67:395–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Titani K, Kumar S, Takio K, Ericsson LH, Wade RD, AshidaK, et al. Amino acid sequence of human von Willebrand factor. Biochemistry. 1986;.25:3171–3184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Matsui T, Titani K, Mizuochi T. Structures of the asparagine-linked oligosaccharide chains of human von Willebrand factor. Occurrence of blood group A, B, and H(O) structures. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267:8723–8731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sodetz JM, Paulson JC, McKee PA. Carbohydrate composition and identification of blood group A, B, and H oligosaccharide structures on human Factor VIII/von Willebrand factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1979;254:10754–10760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. VAN Schooten CJ, Denis CV, Lisman T, Eikenboom JC, Leebeek FW, Goudemand J, et al. Variations in glycosylation of von Willebrand factor with O-linked sialylated T antigen are associated with its plasma levels. Blood. 2007;109:2430–2437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Matsui T, Fujimura Y, Nishida S, Titani K. Human plasma alpha 2-macroglobulin and von Willebrand factor possess covalently linked ABO(H) blood group antigens in subjects with corresponding ABO phenotype. Blood. 1993;82:663–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Canis K, McKinnon TA, Nowak A, Panico M, Morris HR, Laffan M, et al. The plasma von Willebrand factor O-glycome comprises a surprising variety of structures including ABH antigens and disialosyl motifs. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010; 8:137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang X, Halvorsen K, Zhang CZ, Wong WP, SpringerTA. Mechanoenzymatic cleavage of the ultralarge vascular protein von Willebrand factor. Science. 2009;324:1330–1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wu T, Lin J, Cruz MA, Dong JF, Zhu C. Force-induced cleavage of single VWFA1A2A3 tridomains by ADAMTS-13. Blood. 2010;115:370–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Federici AB, De RC, de Groot PG, Samor B, Lombardi R, d'Alessio P, et al. Adhesive properties of the carbohydrate-modified von Willebrand factor (CHO-vWF). Blood. 1988;71:947–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Carew JA, Quinn SM, Stoddart JH, Lynch DC. O-linked carbohydrate of recombinant von Willebrand factor influences ristocetin-induced binding to platelet glycoprotein 1b. J. Clin. Invest. 1992;90:2258–2267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Eikenboom JC, Castaman G, Kamphuisen PW, Rosendaal FR, Bertina RM. The factor VIII/von Willebrand factor ratio discriminates between reduced synthesis and increased clearance of von Willebrand factor. Thromb. Haemost. 2002;87:252–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Morange PE, Tregouet DA, Frere C, Saut N, Pellegrina L, Alessi MC, et al. Biological and genetic factors influencing plasma factor VIII levels in a healthy family population: results from the Stanislas cohort. Br. J. Haematol. 2005;128:91–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Campos M, Sun W, Yu F, Barbalic M, Tang W, Chambless LE, et al. Genetic determinants of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen levels: a target gene SNP and haplotype analysis of ARIC cohort. Blood. 2011;117:5224–5230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Campos M, Buchanan A, Yu F, Barbalic M, Xiao Y, Chambless LE, et al. Influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in factor VIII and von Willebrand factor genes on plasma factor VIII activity: the ARIC Study. Blood. 2012;119:1929–1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhou Z, Yu F, Buchanan A, Fu Y, Campos M, Wu KK, et al. Possible race and gender divergence in association of genetic variations with plasma von Willebrand factor: a study of ARIC and 1000 genome cohorts. PLoS. One. 2014;9:e84810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. The ARIC investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Folsom AR, Wu KK, Rosamond WD, Sharrett AR, Chambless LE. Prospective study of hemostatic factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation. 1997; 96:1102–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schleef M, Strobel E, Dick A, Frank J, Schramm W, Spannagl M. Relationship between ABO and Secretor genotype with plasma levels of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor in thrombosis patients and control individuals. Br. J. Haematol. 2005;128:100–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van Schie MC, van Loon JE, de Maat MP, Leebeek FW. Genetic determinants of von Willebrand factor levels and activity in relation to the risk of cardiovascular disease: a review. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011;9:899–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Barbalic M, Dupuis J, Dehghan A, Bis JC, Hoogeveen RC, Schnabel RB, et al. Large-scale genomic studies reveal central role of ABO in sP-selectin and sICAM-1 levels. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010;19:1863–1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Souto JC, Almasy L, Muniz-Diaz E, Soria JM, Borrell M, Bayen L, et al. Functional effects of the ABO locus polymorphism on plasma levels of von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20:2024–2028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Orstavik KH, Magnus P, Reisner H, Berg K, Graham JB, Nance W. Factor VIII and factor IX in a twin population. Evidence for a major effect of ABO locus on factor VIII level. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1985;37:89–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kamphuisen PW, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, van Houwelingen HC, Eikenboom JC, Bertina RM, Rosendaal FR. Familial clustering of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels. Thromb. Haemost. 1998;79:323–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.