Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0135537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135537

Correction: Perceived Stigma towards Leprosy among Community Members Living Close to Nonsomboon Leprosy Colony in Thailand

The PLOS ONE Staff
PMCID: PMC4527778  PMID: 26247466

The second author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is Bipin Adhikari. The correct citation is: Kaehler N, Adhikari B, Raut S, Marahatta SB, Chapman RS (2015) Perceived Stigma towards Leprosy among Community Members Living Close to Nonsomboon Leprosy Colony in Thailand. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0129086. The publisher apologizes for the error.

There are spelling errors in Tables 1 and 2. Please see the correct Tables 1 and 2, provided by the authors, here.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of unaffected participants and EMIC score (n = 257).

Characteristics Number (%) (EMIC)Median P-value
Age Groups (n = 257)
60 years or below 178(69.3) 14 0.021 *
61 years or older 79(30.7) 18
SD = 17.161, Median = 52, Range = 19–96
Sex (n = 257)
Female 183(71.2) 16 0.748
Male 74(28.8) 15
Marital status (n = 257)
Relationship 222(86.4) 16 0.288
No relationship 35(13.6) 14
Years living in community (n = 257)
≤ 20 years 33(12.8) 10 0.005 *
21–40 years 63(24.5) 14
41–60 years 100(38.9) 16.5
≥ 61 years 54(21) 18
Education (n = 257)
Literate 251(97.7) 16 0.841
Illiterate 6(2.3) 16.5
Years of education (n = 251)
Primary level (≤ 4years) 171(68.1) 17 0.024 **
Secondary level (5-9years) 53(21.1) 16.5
Tertiary level (≥10years) 27(10.8) 16
Occupation (n = 257)
Farmer 75(29.2) 17 0.008 **
Laborer 57(22.2) 13
Private Business 38(14.8) 13
Unemployed 44(17.1) 20
Other 43(16.7) 16
Enough income to support family (n = 257)
Yes 120(46.7) 15.5 0.874
No 136(52.9) 16
Affected person in family (n = 257)
Yes 58(22.7) 16 0.846
No 194(75.8) 15
Don't know 4(1.6) 18.5
Affected person among relative (n = 257)
Yes 30(11.7) 14.5 0.598
No 175(68.4) 16
Don't know 51(19.9) 16

*Man Whitney U test,

**Kruskal Wallis H test

Table 2. Knowledge on leprosy of the participants and EMIC score (n = 257).

Characteristics Number (%) (EMIC)Median P-value
Received information on leprosy (n = 257)
Yes 123 (47.9) 15 0.98
No 134 (52.1) 16
Source of information (n = 123)
Medical institution 47 (38.2) 16 0.654
Friend or family 23 (18.7) 14
Other (TV/Radio/Paper) 53 (43.1) 16
Knowledge on cause of leprosy (n = 257)
Yes 79 (30.7) 15 0.896
No 178 (69.3) 16
Source of leprosy cause (n = 79)
Bacteria/Microorganism 20 (25.3) 14.5 0.148
Other 59 (74.7) 15
Leprosy very infectious (n = 253)
Yes 105 (41.5) 17 0.054
No 148 (58.5) 14
Leprosy transmission (n = 257)
Yes 83 (32.3) 16 0.439
No 174 (67.7) 15
Leprosy transmitted from (n = 83)
Air 12 (14.5) 15.5 0.766
Water/soil 1 (1.2) 19
Food 1 (1.2) 21
Close contact to persons 32 (38.6) 16.5
Other (Animal/Mosquito) 37 (44.6) 16
Leprosy difficult to treat (n = 257)
Yes 136 (52.9) 17 0.015 *
No 121 (47.1) 14
Knowledge on signs/symptoms of leprosy
Yes 106 (41.2) 16 0.929
No 151 (58.8) 15
Signs and symptoms (n = 106)
Patches 21 (19.8) 14 0.861
Patches with decreased sensitivity 10 (9.4) 14
Weakness hand, feet, eyelids 1 (0.9) 15
Nerve pain 1 (0.9) 21
Painless wounds 3 (2.8) 16
Multiple 70 (66.0) 17
Leprosy severe disease (n = 257)
Yes 138 (53.7) 17.5 0.004 *
No 119 (46.3) 14
Leprosy punishment by God (n = 257)
Yes 72 (28.0) 18.5 0.011 *
No 185 (72.0) 14

*Man Whitney U test,

**Kruskal Wallis H test

Reference


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES