Abstract
Mechanical analysis has been shown to be complementary to luminal stenosis in assessing atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. However, patient-specific material properties are not available and the effect of material properties variability has not been fully quantified. Media and fibrous cap (FC) strips from carotid endarterectomy samples were classified into hard, intermediate and soft according to their incremental Young's modulus. Lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage/thrombus strips were classified as hard and soft. Idealised geometry-based 3D fluid-structure interaction analyses were performed to assess the impact of material property variability in predicting maximum principal stress (Stress-P1) and stretch (Stretch-P1). When FC was thick (1000 or 600 µm), Stress-P1 at the shoulder was insensitive to changes in material stiffness, whereas Stress-P1 at mid FC changed significantly. When FC was thin (200 or 65 µm), high stress concentrations shifted from the shoulder region to mid FC, and Stress-P1 became increasingly sensitive to changes in material properties, in particular at mid FC. Regardless of FC thickness, Stretch-P1 at these locations was sensitive to changes in material properties. Variability in tissue material properties influences both the location and overall stress/stretch value. This variability needs to be accounted for when interpreting the results of mechanical modelling. © 2015 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: atherosclerosis, stroke, mechanics, stress, material property, sensitivity
1. Introduction
Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide and remains a significant source of mortality [1]. Carotid atherosclerotic disease is responsible for around 30% of all ischemic strokes [2]. At present, carotid luminal stenosis is the only validated diagnostic criterion for patient risk stratification, but this measure becomes less reliable in patients with mild to moderate stenoses [3]. There is increasing evidence to suggest that the physical characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques, and the mechanical loading within the structure, may allow greater potential to discriminate clinical progression than luminal stenosis alone.
A vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque is characterised by the presence of intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) and a large lipid-rich necrotic core, with symptomatic plaques also showing evidence of fibrous cap (FC) rupture. These features can be accurately quantified by in vivo high-resolution, multi-contrast magnetic resonance imaging [4–6], which has been shown to predict future events in both symptomatic [7, 8] and asymptomatic, [9, 10] patients. IPH and FC rupture have also been identified as higher-risk features associated with both clinical symptoms at presentation [11]. As plaques are continually subject to mechanical loading, because of pulsatile blood pressure and flow, FC rupture is thought to occur when loading exceeds its material strength [12, 13]. FC stress can differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients [14, 15] and has also been found to be associated with subsequent cerebrovascular ischaemic events in symptomatic patients [16].
There is therefore a need to integrate both plaque morphological/compositional features with the critical mechanical conditions, if patient risk stratification is to be improved. However, the reliability of computational modelling to calculate the critical mechanical conditions is dependent on the accuracy of the material properties for each atherosclerotic component, including intraplaque haemorrhage or thrombus (IPH/T), lipid and FC. Previous ex vivo studies have shown the wide variability of material properties from sample to sample [17–20], suggesting the need of patient-specific material properties. Although advanced imaging techniques may make this achievable [21], the accuracy of material properties derived from in vivo measures requires further comprehensive validation [22–24]. Additionally, a complex inverse procedure has to follow to estimate nonlinear mechanical properties of vascular tissues based on in vivo data [25, 26]. Because of these limitations, patient-specific material properties have not been considered in the majority of clinically oriented studies [13, 27–30]. Thus, there is a need to assess whether variability in tissue material property measures impacts the overall calculation of the critical mechanical conditions within an atherosclerotic plaque.
It has been previously shown that the variation in material properties generates relatively small errors in the prediction of structural stresses [31]. Even a ±50% variation in elastic modulus leads to <10% change in stress at the site of plaque rupture. Sensitivity to variations in the elastic modulus is comparable between isotropic nonlinear, isotropic nonlinear with residual strains and transversely isotropic linear models [31]. This was confirmed when the change in stress and strain values predicted, using parameters from two very different specimens, were relatively minor (within 20%) despite the substantial difference in stiffness and direction of anisotropy [32]. Conflicting results have suggested that peak stress varied largely with the intima stiffness, in particular, when the FC was thin [33]. This study aims to assess the influence of variability in material properties of media, FC, lipid and IPH/T obtained from direct material tests on stress and stretch conditions within the plaque structure.
2. Methods
2.1. Material test and tissue stiffness category
Carotid plaque samples were collected from 21 symptomatic patients who were scheduled from endarterectomy. Each sample was cut into rings along the axial direction and media; FC, lipid and IPH/T were further isolated from each ring, if present, to perform uni-extension testing. Full details regarding the testing procedure have been previously described [34]. In total, 65 media strips from 17 endarterectomy samples, 59 FC strips from 14 plaques, 38 lipid strips from 11 plaques and 21 IPH/T strips from 11 plaques underwent successful testing. The stretch–stress curves of each tissue type varied widely (Figure 1) with some of them being much stiffer than others. In this study, an incremental Young's modulus-based classification method was proposed to classify media and FC into three stiffness categories: hard, intermediate and soft; and lipid and IPH/T were classified as hard and soft considering the smaller number of tissue strips. The incremental Young's modulus, E, was calculated using
Figure 1.

Stress–stretch curves obtained from uni-extension tests with different atherosclerotic components (A) media; (B) fibrous cap; (C) lipid and (D) intraplaque haemorrhage/thrombus. Curves in red stand for those classified as hard, green for intermediate and blue for soft. Points represent the energy-based averaged data for each stiffness category, and the associated dash line is the fitting line based on modified Mooney–Rivlin strain energy density function.
where σ and ε were Cauchy stress and strain described by modified Mooney–Rivlin strain energy density function,
in which I1 and J are the first invariant and Jocabian determinate of the deformation gradient, respectively; c1 and D1 are material constants, and K is the Lagrange multiplier for incompressibility. The stiffness category was generated following steps of (1) the stress–stretch curve of each tissue strip was firstly fitted using the Mooney–Rivlin strain energy density function; (2) the incremental Young's modulus,
(i = 1,…100), was computed at 100 stretch levels that equally distributed between 1.0 and 1.4; (3) each
was scored by 1, 2 or 3 according to the ranking in media and FC and by 1 or 2 in lipid and IPH/T group; and (4) the score at each stretch level was finally summed up to represent the stiffness ranking of a tissue strip, and it was further classified as hard, intermediate or soft according to the total score. The upper 1/3 of media and FC were classified as hard followed by intermediate, while the lower 1/3 were classified as soft; for lipid and IPH/T, the upper 1/2 were classified as hard, while the remaining were classified as soft.
In each stiffness category, the total energy of each curve was computed by using [34]
in which λmax is the maximum stretch value of a stress–stretch curve. An energy-based average approach [34] was used to generate a representative curve for each stiffness catalogue. Fifty equal distance internals were placed between maximum and minimum energy levels, and the stretch and stress of experiment points within each energy level were averaged, as shown in Figure 1. The data points were fitted using modified Mooney–Rivlin strain energy density function to obtain the material constants for each stiffness category.
2.2. 3D fluid-structure interaction analysis
Three dimensional idealised plaque models were constructed to perform the parameter studies. As shown in Figure 2, the model represented a typical atherosclerotic plaque with 50% stenosis, composed of FC, lipid and IPH (the rest was assumed to be media). The plaque length was set to be 20 mm, and the lengths of proximal and distal sections were 120 mm to avoid potential entrance effect. As FC thickness <65 and <200 µm are the accepted definition of rupture-prone plaques in the coronary [35] and carotid [36] arteries, respectively, models with a cap thickness of 65 and 200 µm were constructed to represent high-risk lesions, and models with FC thickness 1000 and 600 µm were used to represent low-risk lesions.
Figure 2.

3D geometry of the idealised plaque model composed of fibrous cap, lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage (A) sagittal cut of 3D geometry and (B) the cross-section at the most stenotic site. The extended section is not shown, and fibrous cap thickness can be adjusted by moving the lipid and IPH towards and away from the luminal edge.
Plaque components were assumed to be hard, intermediate and soft as described previously resulting in 36 plaque models with different combination of stiffness categories for each case with a defined FC thickness. The total number of models was therefore 144 (=36 × 4). A ‘volume curve fitting’ technique [13] was employed to assist the generation of hexahedron elements for both structure and fluid domains, to handle fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analyses involving non-linear material properties and big deformations. The pressure waveforms at the inlet and outlet are shown in Figure 3, with systolic and diastolic pressures at the inlet being 120 and 80 mmHg, respectively. Symmetric conditions were adopted as shown in Figure 2A. The blood flow was assumed to be Newtonian, viscous and incompressible. FSI simulations were performed using ADINA 8.7 (ADINA Inc., MA, USA). The energy convergence criterion was used for solid domain during equilibrium iterations with the relative energy tolerance being 0.05 and relative force and moment tolerance being 0.01. For the fluid domain, the relative tolerances for velocities, pressure and displacements were set to be 0.06 for controlling the equilibrium. The fluid-structure coupling was solved iteratively. Both the displacement and velocities at the fluid-structure interface and the forces on the structure due to the viscous fluid were checked for convergence. Relative displacement/velocity and force tolerances were both set to be 0.06. Maximum principal stress (Stress-P1) and stretch (Stretch-P1), both at mid FC and the shoulder region, were used to characterise the critical mechanical conditions within the plaque structure. The influence of material properties from different stiffness categories on both of Stress-P1 and Stretch-P1 was subsequently analysed.
Figure 3.

Inlet and outlet pressure waveforms.
3. Results
3.1. Material constants of different stiffness category
As shown in Figure 1, the modified Mooney–Rivlin strain energy density function could characterise the nonlinear stress–stretch curves for each tissue type. Moreover, the incremental Young's modulus-based scoring method could reasonably classify plaque component into different stiffness categories. The corresponding fitting parameters are listed in Table I.
Table I.
Material constants of different stiffness categories for each tissue type.
| Tissue type | Stiffness category | c1 (×10−3 kPa) | D1 (kPa) | D2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media | Soft | 69.37 | 3.59 | 11.51 |
| Intermediate | 335.90 | 6.95 | 14.32 | |
| Hard | 0.01 | 7.58 | 22.43 | |
| Fibrous cap | Soft | 159.86 | 2.62 | 13.57 |
| Intermediate | 108.41 | 3.11 | 25.54 | |
| Hard | 31.71 | 2.43 | 62.13 | |
| Lipid | Soft | 129.64 | 0.34 | 11.71 |
| Hard | 124.90 | 11.13 | 5.28 | |
| Intra-plaque haemorrhage or thrombus | Soft | 148.21 | 2.42 | 5.60 |
| Hard | 147.70 | 6.10 | 5.88 |
3.2. Material properties uncertainty analysis
Figure 4A shows band plots of Stress-P1 and Stretch-P1 in a typical plaque structure with intermediate media and FC, and soft lipid and IPH/T (FC thickness = 600 µm). High stress and stretch concentration were found in the shoulder region where luminal curvature was large. If the FC was changed to be soft (Figure 4B), both stress and stretch in the shoulder region decreased by 15.8% and 0.9%, respectively, and the values at the mid FC decreased by 13.5% and increased by 5.6%. Alternatively, if the material properties were kept unchanged, but FC thickness reduced to be 200 µm, the stress at the mid FC increased by 81.6% (Figure 4C). As shown in Figure 4D, when a soft FC thickness was reduced to 200 µm, the stretch at the mid FC increased by 20.6%.
Figure 4.

Band plots of Stress-P1 and Stretch-P1 for idealised models with different combination of stiffness categories and fibrous cap (FC) thickness (A) fibrous cap thickness – 600 µm, media and FC – intermediate, lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage – soft; (B) the same model as the one shown in A, but fibrous cap – soft; (C) the same model as the one shown in A, but fibrous cap thickness – 200 µm; and (D) the same model as the one shown in B, but fibrous cap thickness – 200 µm.
It can be seen from Figure 4 that the material properties produce different effects on the stress and stretch at each location (the shoulder region and mid FC). Such influence depends largely on FC thickness with more details shown in both Figures 4 and 5. When the FC was thick (1000 or 600 µm; the first two columns in Figures 4 and 5), high stress and stretch concentrations were mainly located at the plaque shoulder. For FC 1000 µm, the highest stress and stretch concentrations (228.5 kPa and 1.240) were found through the combination of soft media and hard FC (both lipid and IPH were soft); and the lowest stress and stretch concentrations (146.5 kPa and 1.06) were for hard media and all other components being soft. Similar stress and stretch characteristics were found in the case of FC 600 µm. The highest stress and stretch concentrations were 249.8 kPa and 1.225, respectively, under the combination of soft media and hard FC (both lipid and PH were soft), and the lowest of 136.0 kPa and 1.052, respectively, under the combination of hard media and all other components being soft. Big stress and stretch changes were found at mid FC when different combinations of material strength were applied. When FC was 1000 µm, the stress at the mid FC could change from 9.3 kPa in the case of media being hard while all others soft to 62.9 kPa in the case of media, lipid and IPH being soft and FC hard. When was 600 µm, the stress at the mid FC could change from 10.7 to 94.0 kPa using the exact same stiffness categories. When the FC thickness reduced to 200 µm, the stress level at the mid of FC increased, while if FC thickness reduced to 65 µm, the highest stress concentration shifted from the shoulder to mid FC, in most combinations. As shown in the chart at the middle of the last column in Figure 5, stress could rise to 615.2 kPa when the media was soft and FC hard (both lipid and PH were soft).
Figure 5.

Stress-P1 in the shoulder and at mid fibrous cap (FC) with different combinations of media and FC stiffness categories under the condition of both lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage being soft (first row: Stress-P1 in the shoulder region; second row: Stress-P1 at mid FC; third row: critical stress, maximum value of Stress-P1 in the shoulder and at mid FC, and FC thickness for the first, second, third and fourth columns are 1000, 600, 200 and 65 µm, respectively.
It can been seen from the last row of Figure 5, the impact of combinations of different material stiffness's on critical stress concentrations, defined as the maximum value of stress in the shoulder and at mid FC, becomes greater when FC thickness reduces. The stress standard deviation increased from 28.4 kPa for FC 1000 µm and 40.2 kPa for FC 600 µm to 47.5 kPa for FC 200 µm and 163.8 kPa for FC 65 µm. The critical stretch concentrations are also shown to be sensitive in all cases, either with a thick or thin FC (the last row in Figure 6). The stiffness of media dominates stretch conditions and the largest critical stretch, defined as the maximum stretch value in the shoulder and at mid FC, always appeared in cases with a soft media. Under most conditions, large stretch concentrations were located in the shoulder region (the first row in Figure 6) with some exceptions (shift to the mid of FC) when FC thickness reduced to be 200 or 65 µm.
Figure 6.

Stretch-P1 in the shoulder and at mid FC with different combinations of media and FC stiffness category under the condition of both lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage being soft (first row: Stretch-P1 in the shoulder region; second row: Stretch-P1 at mid FC; third row: critical stretch, the maximum value of Stretch-P1 in the shoulder and at mid FC, and FC thickness for the first, second, third and fourth columns are 1000, 600, 200 and 65 µm, respectively.
Apart from media and FC, the stiffness of lipid and IPH play an important role on the pattern of stress and stretch distribution within the structure. When FC was thick, for a fixed combination of media and FC, stress and stretch in the shoulder region and at mid FC were insensitive to the stiffness of lipid and IPH. However, when FC thickness decreased, stress and stretch at mid FC increased dramatically. As shown in Figure 7A and B, for the combination of intermediate media and FC, when FC was 1000 µm, stress increased from 201.4 to 211.8 kPa in the shoulder and 23.2 to 40.4 kPa at mid FC when the hard lipid and IPH were replaced by soft. Under the same circumstance, when FC 65 µm, stress decreased from 278.4 to 222.3 kPa at the shoulder and increased by 353% at mid FC (from 51.0 to 231.0 kPa). Similar observations were found in terms of stretch as shown in Figure 7C and D.
Figure 7.

Comparisons of Stress-P1 and Stretch-P1 when lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) are soft and hard (A) and (B) Stress-P1 in the shoulder and at mid fibrous cap (FC) when FC thickness is 1000 and 65 µm, respectively; and Stretch-P1 in the shoulder and at mid FC when FC thickness is 1000 and 65 µm, respectively.
4. Discussion
Our study aimed to explore the influence of material property variability on critical plaque stress and stretch conditions, by using different combinations of stiffness categories obtained from direct uni-extension material tests. The results obtained show that the sensitivity of stress to tissue material properties largely depends on FC thickness and location. Generally, in the shoulder region (first row of Figure 5 and 6), softer media results in higher stress and stretch; and harder FC leads to higher stress and stretch. Compared with the plaque shoulder, stress at mid FC was more sensitive to changes in material properties even when the FC was thick (the second row in Figure 5). Except for some combinations when FC 200 µm (the third chart in the second row), although the percentage change was large, changes in absolute stress values were relatively small (<80 kPa). In the case of thin FC, the change of stress both in the shoulder and at mid FC was large when different combinations of stiffness categories were applied. In particular in the case of FC thickness being 65 µm, at mid FC, the average stress value was 245.8 kPa with standard deviation of 197.1 kPa (the last chart in the second row of Figure 5). The stretch either in the shoulder or at the mid of FC appeared to be always sensitive to alterations in plaque material properties.
In general, stress and stretch within FC were sensitive to the uncertainty of material stiffness, which is in agreement with a reported study by Akyildiz et al [33]. However Williamson et al [31] concluded that the variation in material properties generated relatively small errors in the prediction of structural stresses. These contradictory views may be because of the relatively smaller variation of material stiffness used [31], compared with the current study. Moreover, the material stiffness of lipid used in the study performed by Williamson et al was significantly underestimated as compared with the value obtained from direct measurements [34], being derived from an experimental study using polymers mimicking lipid pools [37]. In the case of stretch ratio being 1.25, the stress was only 1.98 kPa, while it should be about 100 kPa according to the direct measurement using lipid tissue strips [34]. When the lipid was changed from hard to soft, the change of stress was 3.79 kPa at the stretch level of 1.25. Such small changes were unlikely to have a significant impact on the stress level within FC.
In this study, FC thicknesses were chosen to be 1000, 600, 200 and 65 µm as each of these values represented a predefined threshold. In our study, 1000 µm was used to represent lesions with a thick FC, while 600 µm was the mean minimum FC thickness quantified by in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patient groups [6]. Based on autopsy specimens, 200 µm was suggested as the optimum value for FC thickness to allow discrimination between ruptured and non-ruptured carotid plaques [36], while 95% of all ruptured coronary plaques have been found to have a cap thickness of <65 µm [35]. In this study, the idealised plaque model was reconstructed referring to the dimension of human carotid plaques. The level of stress concentration obtained was comparable with previous reported patient-specific analyses of lesions from the same location. For example, Tang et al [13] analysed stress conditions within five ruptured human carotid plaques. He and his colleagues assumed that FC thickness at the site of rupture was 200 µm. Stresses at the ruptured site were 457.85, 241.90, 195.51, 161.92 and 179.14, respectively (Mean ± SD: 247.3 ± 121.4 kPa). These values were comparable with the case of FC thickness = 200 µm in our study (the third column in Figure 5).
As shown in Figures 4 and 5, we observed higher stress and stretch levels in models with a soft media. It has been demonstrated that arterial stiffness increases with age [38], implying that lesions in younger populations may be subject to higher mechanical loading. However, this does not necessarily mean that atherosclerotic lesions in younger populations are at a higher risk of rupture, as other pathobiological factors, including local inflammation [39], are important in plaque instability. Moreover, we found that stress was increased when FC became harder. In the shoulder region, this may be because of the mismatch of material properties as this is known to result in high stress concentrations [29], while in mid FC this may be because of stronger material undertaking bigger loading. Variations of stress and stretch, with changing of different combination of stiffness categories, may represent some underlying pathological process. Indeed, it has been observed that hypocellular FCs were one to two times stiffer than cellular caps, with calcified caps being four to five times stiffer [40]. As has been shown in this study, stiffer FC could act to increase stress and stretch, which may explain why lesions with a hypocellular FC are at the highest risk of rupture. Moreover, clinical trials have shown that lipid-lowering therapy may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events [41, 42] by transforming cholesterol esters to cholesterol monohydrate. This would lead to a stiffer lipid core [43] and decrease the stress and stretch level within the cap, in particular when FC is thin (Figure 7). Furthermore, the results shown in Figure 7 are consistent with previous findings that when fresh haemorrhage progressed to be chronic (stiffer), FC stress decreased by 35% [44].
Because of the difficulty in obtaining patient-specific material properties, a single set of material constants for each plaque component has been used in most reported computational modelling studies. However, experiments have shown that the material properties of plaque components are not only patient dependent but also location dependent [45–49, 43, 34]. In addition, this study suggests that the variation of material properties may have an appreciable influence on simulation results, and errant material parameters have potential to lead to inaccurate mechanical analyses. If mechanical modelling is to be improved, there is a need to obtain patient-specific material properties by using in vivo imaging modalities [21]. However, comprehensive understanding on the material behaviour of each atherosclerotic component from in vivo measurements requires validation and remains constrained by current imaging limitations such as poor resolution, scanning time and signal penetration depth. In the meantime, this study might provide a compromised solution: (1) plaque stiffness could be classified as hard, intermediate or soft according to in vivo measurements, such as elastography and (2) the material constants suggested for each stiffness category, as listed in Table I, could be used to perform mechanical analysis. However, it is challenging to estimate the stiffness of each component based on elastography alone. Novel MR deformation imaging techniques [50, 51] providing the combination of elastography map and anatomic information may be a future potential solution.
5. Limitation
Within this study, only Stress-P1 and Stretch-P1 were analysed as these stresses are believed to play a role in plaque rupture, compared with blood shear stress [13]. In cases of patient-specific analysis, the 3D structure-only model rather than 3D FSI can be used to re-predict these two parameters as it is inexpensive yet reasonably accurate approximation [52]. The conclusions were obtained based on idealised plaque geometries for the convenience of parameter studies. Further studies are required to validate these conclusions using patient-specific plaque geometries. We made no attempt to measure calcification during uni-axial testing or included this component in modelling processes. However, arterial calcification is considering a protective mechanism for rupture and ruptured plaques are unlikely to contain large plates of calcium [53], although plaques with juxtaluminal calcific nodules may be at higher risk [29]. We acknowledge other mechanisms may be involved in ischemic events, including calcific nodules and erosions. The effects of material properties on these mechanisms are yet to be determined. The material properties of media, FC, lipid and IPH/T were obtained from uni-extension tests, and anisotropic material behaviour was not considered. Finally, no attempt was made to model residual stresses.
6. Conclusions
The sensitivity of stress at either the shoulder region or mid FC to tissue material properties largely depends on FC thickness. In the shoulder region, softer media results in higher stress and stretch; and harder FC leads to higher stress and stretch. Compared with the plaque shoulder, stress at mid FC is more sensitive to changes in material properties even when FC is thick. The stretch either in the shoulder or at the mid of FC appears to be always sensitive to material properties.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by BHF PG/11/74/29100, HRUK RG2638/14/16, National Natural Science Foundation of China 81270386 and 81170291 and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. Mr Yuan is supported by China Scholarship Council (CSC) Cambridge Scholarship.
Disclosure
The authors do not have any conflict of interest to be declared.
References
- 1.Mathers CD, Fat DM, Boerma J. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. The Lancet. 1997;349:1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, Rankin RN, Clagett GP, Hachinski VC, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Meldrum HE, Spence JD. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North american symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial collaborators. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339:1415–1425. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Davis JW, Ellington E, Ferguson MS, Hatsukami TS. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002;105:181–185. doi: 10.1161/hc0202.102121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chu B, Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Yarnykh VL, O'Brien KD, Polissar NL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004;35:1079–1084. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sadat U, Weerakkody RA, Bowden DJ, Young VE, Graves MJ, Li ZY, Tang TY, Gaunt ME, Hayes PD, Gillard JH. Utility of high resolution MR imaging to assess carotid plaque morphology: a comparison of acute symptomatic, recently symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eliasziw M, Streifler JY, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJ. Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North american symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Stroke. 1994;25:304–308. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.2.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PS, Auer D, MacSweeney ST, Moody AR, Gladman JR. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2008;47:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Underhill H, Cai J, Tran N, Polissar NL, Isaac C, Ferguson MS, Garden GA, Cramer SC, Maravilla KR, Hashimoto B, Hatsukami TS. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI – initial results. Stroke. 2006;37:818–823. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Singh N, Moody AR, Gladstone DJ, Leung G, Ravikumar R, Zhan J, Maggisano R. Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men. Radiology. 2009;252:502–508. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522080792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Teng Z, Sadat U, Huang Y, Young VE, Graves MJ, Lu J, Gillard JH. In vivo MRI-based 3D mechanical stress–strain profiles of carotid plaques with juxtaluminal plaque haemorrhage: an exploratory study for the mechanism of subsequent cerebrovascular events. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2011;42:427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Richardson PD, Davies MJ, Born GV. Influence of plaque configuration and stress distribution on fissuring of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 1989;2:941–944. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90953-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tang D, Teng Z, Canton G, Yang C, Ferguson M, Huang X, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Yuan C. Sites of rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaques are associated with high structural stresses: an in vivo MRI-based 3D fluid-structure interaction study. Stroke. 2009;40:3258–3263. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Graves MJ, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based biomechanical stress analysis of carotid atheroma: a comparison of single transient ischaemic attack, recurrent transient ischaemic attacks, non-disabling stroke and asymptomatic patient groups. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2011;41:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu C, Teng Z, Sadat U, Young VE, Graves MJ, Li ZY, Gillard JH. Normalized wall index specific and MRI-based stress analysis of atherosclerotic carotid plaques: a study comparing acutely symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Circulation Journal. 2010;74:2360–2364. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Walsh SR, Li ZY, Graves MJ, Varty K, Gillard JH. Association between biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic carotid plaques and subsequent ischaemic cerebrovascular events – a longitudinal in vivo magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010;40:485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ebenstein DM, Coughlin D, Chapman J, Li C, Pruitt LA. Nanomechanical properties of calcification, fibrous tissue, and hematoma from atherosclerotic plaques. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. 2009;91:1028–1037. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maher E, Creane A, Sultan S, Hynes N, Lally C, Kelly DJ. Tensile and compressive properties of fresh human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Journal of Biomechanics. 2009;42:2760–2767. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barrett SR, Sutcliffe MP, Howarth S, Li ZY, Gillard JH. Experimental measurement of the mechanical properties of carotid atherothrombotic plaque fibrous cap. Journal of Biomechanics. 2009;42:1650–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chai CK, Akyildiz AC, Speelman L, Gijsen FJ, Oomens CW, van Sambeek MR, van der Lugt A, Baaijens FP. Local axial compressive mechanical properties of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques-characterisation by indentation test and inverse finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2013;46:1759–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teng Z, Sadat U, Brown AJ, Gillard JH. Plaque hemorrhage in carotid artery disease: pathogenesis, clinical and biomechanical considerations. Journal of Biomechanics. 2014;47:847–858. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanai H, Hasegawa H, Ichiki M, Tezuka F, Koiwa Y. Elasticity imaging of atheroma with transcutaneous ultrasound: preliminary study. Circulation. 2003;107:3018–3021. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078633.31922.8A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Viola F, Kramer MD, Lawrence MB, Oberhauser JP, Walker WF. Sonorheometry: a noncontact method for the dynamic assessment of thrombosis. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2004;32:696–705. doi: 10.1023/b:abme.0000030235.72255.df. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xie H, Kim K, Aglyamov SR, Emelianov SY, O'Donnell M, Weitzel WF, Wrobleski SK, Myers DD, Wakefield TW, Rubin JM. Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2005;31:1351–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karimi R, Zhu T, Bouma BE, Mofrad MR. Estimation of nonlinear mechanical properties of vascular tissues via elastography. Cardiovascular Engineering. 2008;8:191–202. doi: 10.1007/s10558-008-9061-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu H, Canton G, Yuan C, Yang C, Billiar K, Teng Z, Hoffman AH, Tang D. Using in vivo cine and 3D multi-contrast MRI to determine human atherosclerotic carotid artery material properties and circumferential shrinkage rate and their impact on stress/strain predictions. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2012;134:011008. doi: 10.1115/1.4005685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sadat U, Teng Z, Young V, Walsh S, Li Z, Graves M, Varty K, Gillard J. Association between biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic carotid plaques and subsequent ischaemic cerebrovascular events – a longitudinal in vivo magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010;40:485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao H, Long Q, Kumar Das S, Halls J, Graves M, Gillard JH, Li ZY. Study of carotid arterial plaque stress for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Journal of Biomechanics. 2011;44:2551–2557. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Teng Z, He J, Sadat U, Mercer JR, Wang X, Bahaei NS, Thomas OM, Gillard JH. How does juxtaluminal calcium affect critical mechanical conditions in carotid atherosclerotic plaque? An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2014;61:35–40. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2275078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang L, Wu Z, Yang C, Zheng J, Bach R, Muccigrosso D, Billiar K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Tang D. Ivus-based FSI models for human coronary plaque progression study: components, correlation and predictive analysis. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015;43:107–121. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1118-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Williamson SD, Lam Y, Younis HF, Huang H, Patel S, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Kamm RD. On the sensitivity of wall stresses in diseased arteries to variable material properties. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2003;125:147–155. doi: 10.1115/1.1537736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kural MH, Cai M, Tang D, Gwyther T, Zheng J, Billiar KL. Planar biaxial characterization of diseased human coronary and carotid arteries for computational modeling. Journal of Biomechanics. 2012;45:790–798. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Akyildiz AC, Speelman L, van Brummelen H, Gutiérrez MA, Virmani R, van der Lugt A, Van Der Steen A, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen F. Effects of intima stiffness and plaque morphology on peak cap stress. Biomedical Engineering Online. 2011;10:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Teng Z, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Feng J, Yuan J, Lu Q, Sutcliffe MPF, Brown AJ, Jing Z, Gillard JH. Material properties of components in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a uni-axial extension study. Acta Biomaterialia. 2014;10:5055–5063. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;336:1276–1282. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705013361802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Redgrave JN, Gallagher P, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Critical cap thickness and rupture in symptomatic carotid plaques: the oxford plaque study. Stroke. 2008;39:1722–1729. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Loree HM, Tobias BJ, Gibson LJ, Kamm RD, Small DM, Lee RT. Mechanical properties of model atherosclerotic lesion lipid pools. Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis: a journal of vascular biology / American Heart Association. 1994;14:230–234. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.14.2.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Najjar SS, Scuteri A, Lakatta EG. Arterial aging: is it an immutable cardiovascular risk factor? Hypertension. 2005;46:454–462. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000177474.06749.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Rudd JH. Pet imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews. Cardiology. 2014;11:443–457. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee RT, Grodzinsky AJ, Frank EH, Kamm RD, Schoen FJ. Structure-dependent dynamic mechanical behavior of fibrous caps from human atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 1991;83:1764–1770. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.5.1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brown G, Albers JJ, Fisher LD, Schaefer SM, Lin J-T, Kaplan C, Zhao X-Q, Bisson BD, Fitzpatrick VF, Dodge HT. Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;323:1289–1298. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199011083231901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Watts G, Lewis B, Lewis E, Coltart D, Smith L, Swan A, Brunt J, Mann J. Effects on coronary artery disease of lipid-lowering diet, or diet plus cholestyramine, in the st thomas' atherosclerosis regression study (stars) The Lancet. 1992;339:563–569. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90863-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Loree HM, Tobias BJ, Gibson LJ, Kamm RD, Small DM, Lee RT. Mechanical properties of model atherosclerotic lesion lipid pools. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1994;14:230–234. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.14.2.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Zhu C, Tang TY, Graves MJ, Gillard JH. Impact of plaque haemorrhage and its age on structural stresses in atherosclerotic plaques of patients with carotid artery disease: an MR imaging-based finite element simulation study. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2011;27:397–402. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9679-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lendon C, Davies M, Richardson P, Born G. Testing of small connective tissue specimens for the determination of the mechanical behaviour of atherosclerotic plaques. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 1993;15:27–33. doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(93)90089-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Gasser CT, Regitnig P. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2005;289:H2048–H2058. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Born GV, Richardson PD. Pathobiology of the Human Atherosclerotic Plaque. New York: Springer; 1990. Mechanical properties of human atherosclerotic lesions; pp. 413–423. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Barrett S, Sutcliffe M, Howarth S, Li ZY, Gillard J. Experimental measurement of the mechanical properties of carotid atherothrombotic plaque fibrous cap. Journal of Biomechanics. 2009;42:1650–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tracqui P, Broisat A, Toczek J, Mesnier N, Ohayon J, Riou L. Mapping elasticity moduli of atherosclerotic plaque in situ via atomic force microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. 2011;174:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Spottiswoode BS, Zhong X, Hess AT, Kramer CM, Meintjes EM, Mayosi BM, Epstein FH. Tracking myocardial motion from cine dense images using spatiotemporal phase unwrapping and temporal fitting. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2007;26:15–30. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2006.884215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stoeck CT, Kalinowska A, von Deuster C, Harmer J, Chan RW, Niemann M, Manka R, Atkinson D, Sosnovik DE, Mekkaoui C, Kozerke S. Dual-phase cardiac diffusion tensor imaging with strain correction. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang Y, Teng Z, Sadat U, Graves MJ, Bennett MR, Gillard JH. The influence of computational strategy on prediction of mechanical stress in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: comparison of 2D structure-only, 3D structure-only, one-way and fully coupled fluid-structure interaction analyses. Journal of Biomechanics. 2014;47:1465–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kwee RM. Systematic review on the association between calcification in carotid plaques and clinical ischemic symptoms. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2010;51:1015–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
