Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1991 Jun;10(6):1593–1603. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07680.x

Identification of two functional regions in Fis: the N-terminus is required to promote Hin-mediated DNA inversion but not lambda excision.

R Osuna 1, S E Finkel 1, R C Johnson 1
PMCID: PMC452825  PMID: 1851089

Abstract

The Fis protein of E. coli binds to a recombinational enhancer sequence that is required to stimulate Hin-mediated DNA inversion. Fis is also required for efficient lambda prophase excision in vivo. The properties of mutant Fis proteins were examined in vivo and in vitro with respect to their stimulatory effects on these two different site-specific DNA recombination reactions. Both recombination reactions are dramatically affected by mutations altering a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif located near the Fis C-terminus (residues 74-93). These mutations invariably decrease DNA binding affinity and some cause reduced DNA bending. Mutations in the Fis N-terminal region reduce or abolish the stimulation of Hin-mediated DNA recombination by Fis, but have little or no effect on DNA binding or lambda excision. We conclude that there are at least two functionally distinct domains in Fis: a C-terminal DNA binding region that is required for promoting both DNA recombination reactions and an N-terminal region that is uniquely required for Hin-mediated inversion.

Full text

PDF
1593

Images in this article

1597Image
on p.1597
1599Image
on p.1599
1599Image
on p.1599

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aggarwal A. K., Rodgers D. W., Drottar M., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. Recognition of a DNA operator by the repressor of phage 434: a view at high resolution. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):899–907. doi: 10.1126/science.3187531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan R. G., Matthews B. W. The helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. J Biol Chem. 1989 Feb 5;264(4):1903–1906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruist M. F., Glasgow A. C., Johnson R. C., Simon M. I. Fis binding to the recombinational enhancer of the Hin DNA inversion system. Genes Dev. 1987 Oct;1(8):762–772. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.8.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. Phase variation and the Hin protein: in vivo activity measurements, protein overproduction, and purification. J Bacteriol. 1984 Jul;159(1):71–79. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.71-79.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Degnen G. E., Cox E. C. Conditional mutator gene in Escherichia coli: isolation, mapping, and effector studies. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):477–487. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.477-487.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fowler R. G., Schaaper R. M., Glickman B. W. Characterization of mutational specificity within the lacI gene for a mutD5 mutator strain of Escherichia coli defective in 3'----5' exonuclease (proofreading) activity. J Bacteriol. 1986 Jul;167(1):130–137. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.130-137.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garner M. M., Revzin A. A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of the Escherichia coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jul 10;9(13):3047–3060. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.13.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gill G., Ptashne M. Mutants of GAL4 protein altered in an activation function. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):121–126. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill G., Sadowski I., Ptashne M. Mutations that increase the activity of a transcriptional activator in yeast and mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2127–2131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodman S. D., Nash H. A. Functional replacement of a protein-induced bend in a DNA recombination site. Nature. 1989 Sep 21;341(6239):251–254. doi: 10.1038/341251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haffter P., Bickle T. A. Purification and DNA-binding properties of FIS and Cin, two proteins required for the bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination system, cin. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 20;198(4):579–587. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harrison S. C., Aggarwal A. K. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:933–969. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heichman K. A., Johnson R. C. The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombination sites at the enhancer. Science. 1990 Aug 3;249(4968):511–517. doi: 10.1126/science.2166334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hughes K. T., Youderian P., Simon M. I. Phase variation in Salmonella: analysis of Hin recombinase and hix recombination site interaction in vivo. Genes Dev. 1988 Aug;2(8):937–948. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.8.937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Humphreys G. O., Willshaw G. A., Smith H. R., Anderson E. S. Mutagenesis of plasmid DNA with hydroxylamine: isolation of mutants of multi-copy plasmids. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Apr 23;145(1):101–108. doi: 10.1007/BF00331564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hübner P., Arber W. Mutational analysis of a prokaryotic recombinational enhancer element with two functions. EMBO J. 1989 Feb;8(2):577–585. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03412.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hübner P., Haffter P., Iida S., Arber W. Bent DNA is needed for recombinational enhancer activity in the site-specific recombination system Cin of bacteriophage P1. The role of FIS protein. J Mol Biol. 1989 Feb 5;205(3):493–500. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90220-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson R. C., Ball C. A., Pfeffer D., Simon M. I. Isolation of the gene encoding the Hin recombinational enhancer binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(10):3484–3488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson R. C., Bruist M. F. Intermediates in Hin-mediated DNA inversion: a role for Fis and the recombinational enhancer in the strand exchange reaction. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1581–1590. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03542.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson R. C., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. Host protein requirements for in vitro site-specific DNA inversion. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):531–539. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson R. C., Glasgow A. C., Simon M. I. Spatial relationship of the Fis binding sites for Hin recombinational enhancer activity. Nature. 1987 Oct 1;329(6138):462–465. doi: 10.1038/329462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson R. C., Simon M. I. Hin-mediated site-specific recombination requires two 26 bp recombination sites and a 60 bp recombinational enhancer. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):781–791. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jordan S. R., Pabo C. O. Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):893–899. doi: 10.1126/science.3187530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kahmann R., Rudt F., Koch C., Mertens G. G inversion in bacteriophage Mu DNA is stimulated by a site within the invertase gene and a host factor. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):771–780. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koch C., Kahmann R. Purification and properties of the Escherichia coli host factor required for inversion of the G segment in bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem. 1986 Nov 25;261(33):15673–15678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koch C., Vandekerckhove J., Kahmann R. Escherichia coli host factor for site-specific DNA inversion: cloning and characterization of the fis gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4237–4241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kostrewa D., Granzin J., Koch C., Choe H. W., Raghunathan S., Wolf W., Labahn J., Kahmann R., Saenger W. Three-dimensional structure of the E. coli DNA-binding protein FIS. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):178–180. doi: 10.1038/349178a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Landy A. Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of lambda site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:913–949. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. A new method for sequencing DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):560–564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nelson H. C., Sauer R. T. Lambda repressor mutations that increase the affinity and specificity of operator binding. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):549–558. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nilsson L., Vanet A., Vijgenboom E., Bosch L. The role of FIS in trans activation of stable RNA operons of E. coli. EMBO J. 1990 Mar;9(3):727–734. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08166.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohlendorf D. H., Anderson W. F., Fisher R. G., Takeda Y., Matthews B. W. The molecular basis of DNA-protein recognition inferred from the structure of cro repressor. Nature. 1982 Aug 19;298(5876):718–723. doi: 10.1038/298718a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pabo C. O., Krovatin W., Jeffrey A., Sauer R. T. The N-terminal arms of lambda repressor wrap around the operator DNA. Nature. 1982 Jul 29;298(5873):441–443. doi: 10.1038/298441a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pabo C. O., Lewis M. The operator-binding domain of lambda repressor: structure and DNA recognition. Nature. 1982 Jul 29;298(5873):443–447. doi: 10.1038/298443a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:293–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Prentki P., Pham M. H., Galas D. J. Plasmid permutation vectors to monitor DNA bending. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Dec 10;15(23):10060–10060. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.23.10060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ross W., Thompson J. F., Newlands J. T., Gourse R. L. E.coli Fis protein activates ribosomal RNA transcription in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J. 1990 Nov;9(11):3733–3742. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07586.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson J. F., Landy A. Empirical estimation of protein-induced DNA bending angles: applications to lambda site-specific recombination complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9687–9705. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson J. F., Moitoso de Vargas L., Koch C., Kahmann R., Landy A. Cellular factors couple recombination with growth phase: characterization of a new component in the lambda site-specific recombination pathway. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90516-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending. Nature. 1984 Apr 5;308(5959):509–513. doi: 10.1038/308509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES