Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2015 Jun 1;5(8):1593–1602. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017665

Shared Genomic Regions Between Derivatives of a Large Segregating Population of Maize Identified Using Bulked Segregant Analysis Sequencing and Traditional Linkage Analysis

Nicholas J Haase *, Timothy Beissinger , Candice N Hirsch , Brieanne Vaillancourt §,**, Shweta Deshpande ††, Kerrie Barry ††, C Robin Buell §,**, Shawn M Kaeppler *,‡‡, Natalia de Leon *,‡‡,1
PMCID: PMC4528316  PMID: 26038364

Abstract

Delayed transition from the vegetative stage to the reproductive stage of development and increased plant height have been shown to increase biomass productivity in grasses. The goal of this project was to detect quantitative trait loci using extremes from a large synthetic population, as well as a related recombinant inbred line mapping population for these two traits. Ten thousand individuals from a B73 × Mo17 noninbred population intermated for 14 generations (IBM Syn14) were grown at a density of approximately 16,500 plants ha−1. Flowering time and plant height were measured within this population. DNA was pooled from the 46 most extreme individuals from each distributional tail for each of the traits measured and used in bulk segregant analysis (BSA) sequencing. Allelic divergence at each of the ∼1.1 million SNP loci was estimated as the difference in allele frequencies between the selected extremes. Additionally, 224 intermated B73 × Mo17 recombinant inbred lines were concomitantly grown at a similar density adjacent to the large synthetic population and were assessed for flowering time and plant height. Using the BSA sequencing method, 14 and 13 genomic regions were identified for flowering time and plant height, respectively. Linkage mapping with the RIL population identified eight and three regions for flowering time and plant height, respectively. Of the regions identified, three colocalized between the two populations for flowering time and two colocalized for plant height. This study demonstrates the utility of using BSA sequencing for the dissection of complex quantitative traits important for production of lignocellulosic ethanol.

Keywords: quantitative trait analysis, maize, biomass, whole genome sequencing, genetic mapping


Structural carbohydrates within maize stover have been proposed as an important biomass source for the fermentation process of sugars into lignocellulosic ethanol (Himmel et al. 2007; Lorenz and Coors 2008; Lorenz et al. 2009), an alternative to grain starch, which is currently and intensively used for ethanol production (Solomon et al. 2007; Yuan et al. 2008). Maize accounted for approximately 36.8 million of the hectares planted in the United States in 2013, with 33.6 million hectares being harvested for grain production alone (USDA 2014). In a recent report from the United States Department of Energy (DOE), maize crop residues accounted for an estimated 70% of the annual grain crop residues from 1998 to 2007 (Perlack and Stokes 2011). Therefore, increasing the amount of corn stover biomass yield would have value in supporting the emerging lignocellulosic biofuel industry.

Plant height (PH) is positively correlated with biomass yield in maize and sorghum (Lubberstedt et al. 1997; Murray et al. 2008; Ritter et al. 2008). The correlation between flowering time (FT) and PH, as well the correlation of FT with other morphological traits related to above-ground biomass production such as total leaf number through the timing of vegetative to reproductive transition in maize, suggests that FT has the potential to impact biomass yield (Irish and Nelson 1991; Yuan et al. 2008). Due to this relationship, both PH and FT were chosen as model traits for this study. Furthermore, understanding independent genetic regions that are responsible for these two traits could ultimately help develop higher biomass yielding maize varieties while maintaining appropriate ranges of maturity by ensuring that changes in plant height would not greatly affect the flowering time of an individual.

PH and FT are extensively studied phenotypic traits in maize. Although these traits are relatively highly heritable, it is likely that only a fraction of the genomic regions contributing to their variation are currently known. Traditional linkage mapping studies have identified 5–12 (6.7 average) and 1–12 (4.6 average) quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with PH and FT (silking date and days to anthesis), respectively (Austin and Lee 1996; Beavis et al. 1991; Bohn et al. 2000; Cardinal et al. 2001; Chardon et al. 2004; Tang et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2011). Larger mapping populations, such as the United States Nested Association Mapping (US-NAM) population, have uncovered numerous small to moderate effect QTL and provide a more detailed dissection of the genetic architecture of these complex traits compared to the small number QTL commonly observed in traditional linkage populations (Buckler et al. 2009; Peiffer et al. 2014). However, phenotyping and genotyping such large collections can be both labor-intensive and expensive to conduct. Bulk segregant analysis (BSA) using whole genome sequencing data has been proposed as a method that can be used to identify QTL for genetically complex traits (Ehrenreich et al. 2010).

BSA was originally proposed by Michelmore et al. (1991) to rapidly identify markers linked to particular traits of interest. Their approach involves a segregating F2 population generated from an initial cross between two phenotypically diverse parents, which is then scored for a phenotype of interest. Bulked DNA or RNA samples are constructed from individuals that show contrasting phenotypes. Genetic markers are then used to screen for differences between the two DNA or RNA pools that associate with the trait of interest. BSA has been mainly used in crop species either for the identification of large effect QTL, such as disease resistance genes, or for mapping qualitative mutations (Quarrie et al. 1999; Hyten et al. 2009; Venuprasad et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012).

The availability of high-density genotyping technologies (Metzker 2010) have allowed for the rapid identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that may be associated with phenotypes of interest, thereby increasing the ability to identify causative regions controlling important traits. However, the cost of sequencing entire populations can still be relatively high, and therefore is still not economically feasible for the assessment of large numbers of recombinant progenies. Genome reduction methods such as genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) can help reduce the cost of genotyping the large numbers of required individuals (Elshire et al. 2011). However, these technologies also result in a high proportion of missing information (Beissinger et al. 2013).

Approaches that use whole genome sequencing of bulked pools of DNA have been used to identify QTL or selected regions in model organisms, such as yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Drosophila (Drosophila melanogaster) (Ehrenreich et al. 2010; Magwene et al. 2011; Turner et al. 2011). These model organisms allow for the generation of very large populations of segregating individuals. This approach has similarly been used for the identification of QTL in rice (Takagi et al. 2013). When applied to a rice RIL population, colocalization of the most significant QTL for resistance to rice blast was observed between linkage mapping and whole genome sequencing on bulked samples of extremes (Takagi et al. 2013). Additionally, this study demonstrated that this method has the ability to detect QTL for important agronomic traits, such as seedling vigor, using an F2-derived rice population, of which some regions identified colocalized with previously reported QTL from other mapping studies (Miura et al. 2001; Fujino et al. 2008; Takagi et al. 2013).

The primary aim of this study was to use BSA sequencing in conjunction with linkage mapping information to identify QTL for two quantitative traits, PH and FT, important for producing lignocellulosic ethanol. This was accomplished using phenotypic extremes from a large segregating synthetic maize population grown concomitantly with a related RIL population.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

The intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) Syn14 population was used for the BSA sequencing analysis. This population was derived from intermating the progenitor population, the IBM Syn10, for four additional generations. The IBM Syn10 was derived by intermating the F2 generation from the initial cross of maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 for 10 generations (Hussain et al. 2007). For the QTL analysis, 224 lines from the IBM RIL population were used (see Supporting Information, Table S1 and Table S2; Lee et al. 2002). These RILs were derived by intermating the F2 generation from the initial cross of B73 × Mo17 for four generations before starting the process of selfing.

Phenotypic collection and analysis

Ten thousand segregating variants from the IBM Syn14 population were planted in 2011 at the West Madison Agricultural Research station in Madison, Wisconsin. To minimize plant-to-plant competition, a planting density of approximately 16,500 plants ha−1 was used. Plants were distributed in the field at a distance of 0.76 meters on all sides of each plant. The IBM RILs were planted at the same density as the IBM Syn14 population in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) using two replications at that location. Additionally, the IBM RILs were also planted at a density of approximately 49,000 plants ha−1 in an RCBD at the same location with two replications. The IBM RILs grown at the two different densities (16,500 and 49,000 plants ha−1) are referred to herein as the IBM density trial.

For individual plants, FT was determined as the first day in which 50% of the tassel spike was exerting anthers. Using information available on cumulative growing degree days (GDD) for Madison, provided by the State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, this measurement was then converted to GDD to pollen shed, and was only recorded for the 226 earliest and 112 latest flowering individuals in the population during the summer of 2011. PH, measured as the distance (cm) from the soil surface to the flag leaf ligule, was also collected. Only the 154 shortest and 158 tallest plants were recorded. The 46 most extreme individuals from each tail of the distribution were then selected for each trait measured (Table S3). PH and FT were also determined on a plot basis for all IBM RILs grown using two different planting densities. FT was recorded when half of the plot flowered, according to the method outlined above. Additionally, PH was measured (as described above) on five healthy plants from each plot, and plot means were calculated as the experimental unit for analysis.

Phenotypic data from the IBM density trial were analyzed using SAS PROC MIXED version 9.2 (SAS Institute) with the following mixed linear model:

Yijk=μ+di+R(D)j+Gk+GDik+εijk [1]

where Yijk is the response variable of the kth genotype (G) in the jth replicate (R) nested in the ith density (D). The residual error εijk was assumed to be independent and following a normal distribution (∼iidN(0,σε2)). Genotype, replicate, and error were considered random effects, whereas density was considered to be a fixed effect. Additionally, best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), to be used for QTL mapping, were calculated for each genotype in both densities separately using equation [1], removing density and genotype-by-density from the model.

DNA extraction and sequencing

In the IBM Syn14 population, leaf tissue was collected from 92 random immature plants to be used as a control group. Inner husk tissue was also collected from the 46 most extreme plants from each distributional tail for both traits measured. Genomic DNA was extracted for individual samples using a modified CTAB method (Sanghai-Maroof et al. 1984). Equimolar DNA pools were then constructed from 46 extreme individuals for each distributional tail (i.e., early flowering, late flowering, tall PH, and short PH) and the 92 random control plants.

Libraries with a target insert size of 500 bp were prepared according to the Illumina protocol (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSequation 2000 (San Diego, CA) at the Joint Genome Institute (Walnut Creek, CA) to generate 100 nt paired-end sequence reads for the early flowering pool and 150 nt paired-end sequence reads for all other pools. Sequence read quality was evaluated using the FastQC program (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/).

Generation of a Mo17 reference sequence

To generate a reference genome for Mo17 and thereby reduce bias in read mapping, genomic reads were cleaned using the FASTX toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html) prior to mapping. The fastx_clipper program was used to remove the Illumina paired-end adapter sequences requiring a minimum sequence length of 15 nt after clipping. Sequence reads were quality trimmed using the fastq_quality_trimmer requiring a minimum quality score of 20 and a minimum read length of 15 nt. All reads that passed through the cleaning step above were mapped as single-end reads using Bowtie version 0.12.7 (Langmead et al. 2009) to the B73 v2 reference sequence (Schnable et al. 2009). An alignment was considered valid if there were two or fewer mismatches relative to the reference sequence (-v 2) and a read was required to have only one valid alignment (-m 1). All other parameters were set to the default values.

Alignment files from all five pools were processed together using the sort, merge, index, and pileup programs within SAMtools version 0.1.12a (Li et al. 2009) to generate a single unfiltered pileup file. For the pileup program, the -B option was used to disable BAQ computation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relative to the B73 reference assembly were identified for positions with at least 10× coverage using only bases from reads with a quality score of 20 or more and requiring a minimum allele frequency of 0.25. In total, 3,301,371 SNPs were called relative to the B73 reference sequence. The corrected Mo17 reference sequence was generated by substituting the alternative allele at all polymorphic positions.

Estimating B73 and Mo17 allele frequencies

To reduce bias between the pools due to sequence length, reads from the five pools were further cleaned using the fastx_trimmer program within the FASTX toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html), allowing a maximum sequence length of 100 nt. Reads were simultaneously mapped as single-end reads to both the B73 v2 reference sequence as well as our Mo17 reference sequence using Bowtie version 0.12.7 (Langmead et al. 2009) requiring a perfect match (-v 0) and a unique alignment (-m 1). Only sequence reads that mapped to either the B73 or the Mo17 reference sequence, but not both, were retained. Alignments from the retained reads were processed using the sort, merge, index, and pileup programs within SAMtools version 0.1.12a (Li et al. 2009) to generate an unfiltered pileup file for each of the five pools. Allele frequency estimates within each pool were determined for the B73 and Mo17 alleles at the 3,301,371 previously identified SNP loci. Only reads with a quality score of 20 or more were used to estimate allele frequencies. To obtain accurate allele frequency estimates, if the coverage within a sequenced pool was less than 20 or greater than 60.8 (mean across the pools plus 1 SD) the position was considered missing data within that pool. Finally, positions that had a B73 allele frequency of less than 0.25, greater than 0.75, or missing data in the control population were discarded. After filtering, 1,096,729 and 1,149,984 polymorphic SNPs were retained for further analysis for FT and PH, respectively. The observed genome-wide mean for the estimated B73 allele frequency was 0.48±0.18 for early, 0.52±0.15 for late, 0.53±0.18 for short, 0.52±0.19 for tall, and 0.53±0.13 for control pools.

BSA sequencing and QTL mapping

B73 allele frequencies for each locus were estimated using the read counts in each of the five pools as described above. Using a custom script written in R version 3.1.1 (File S1; R Core Team 2014) using the zoo software package (Zeileis and Grothendieck 2005), a standard two-sided Z-test was then performed to determine the significance of each difference in terms of allele frequency between the pools of extreme individuals for each loci tested for both FT and PH and was allowed to slide over windows such that

Z= 1dj=1dpj(top)pj(bottom)p^j(1p^j)(1nj(top) + 1nj(bottom)) ; [2]
p^j= xj(top)+xj(bottom)nj(top)+nj(bottom)  [3]

where pj(top) and pj(bottom) were the estimated allele frequencies and nj(top) and nj(bottom) were the observed number of reads for the jth SNP between the two pools for the two traits measured (i.e., early minus late FT, or tall minus short PH plants). The expected allele frequency, p^j, was calculated using the number of reads for the B73 allele (xj(top) and xj(bottom)) and the total number of observed reads (nj(top) and nj(bottom)) for the jth SNP. This statistic was then averaged across a window of size d, which was equal to 15 SNPs, and then compared back to a standardized normal distribution to obtain p-values for each SNP. The negative log10 of the p-values were then used for identifying significant SNPs. Because statistics based on windows of several markers were applied across regions of unknown linkage disequilibrium between groups of markers, creating permutation thresholds was not feasible for this study. Likewise, a Bonferroni correction was too conservative and FDR thresholds (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) were generally too liberal. Therefore, to correct for multiple testing, an outlier threshold of 0.5% used for the calling of significant QTL was considered the most reasonable approach. This approach was similar to those used for detecting selective sweeps using pooled DNA samples for unidirectional and divergently selected populations of maize (Beissinger et al. 2014; Hirsch et al. 2014). The boundary of a significant region included all SNPs with a –log10(p-value) over this threshold and the adjacent seven SNPs upstream and downstream of the significant region, as these markers were used to estimate the last significant SNPs within a region. To resolve peaks, a nonsignificant region of 5 Mb was required between the left-most SNP of a significant region and the right-most SNP of the prior significant region. This approach was also similar to that used by Beissinger et al. (2014) while using whole genome sequencing on bulked samples for scanning selection sites in a population of maize undergoing recurrent selection for prolificacy.

QTL mapping was performed separately on the IBM data for both densities (16,500 plants ha−1 and 49,000 plants ha−1) from the summer of 2011 for both PH and FT. BLUPs for each genotype, used for mapping, were calculated from a linear model for each density separately. Mapping was performed on the marker set outlined and provided in the work by Burton et al. (2015). Using the software SEG-Map (Zhao et al. 2010), the authors imputed a parental phase for markers generated from GBS to generate a total of 8224 recombination bin breakpoints that were used as markers (Burton et al. 2015). Additionally outputted from SEG-Map was a conversion file for genetic to physical positions on all estimated breakpoints. QTL mapping was conducted using the stepwise multiple QTL mapping function in the software program R/qtl (Broman et al. 2003). A permuted LOD threshold was determined for each trait mapped using 1000 permutations of a single QTL model with no covariates. LOD intervals of 1.5 were then used to define the boundaries of significant regions. Mapping was conducted using genetic positions, which were converted to physical positions using the IBM map conversion file for comparison to the BSA sequencing method.

Results

Phenotypic evaluation

Phenotypic distributions for the IBM Syn14 population and IBM RILs, both grown at low density, were compared for FT and PH (Figure 1). Both traits showed larger amounts of transgressive segregation of phenotypes within the IBM Syn14 population relative to the IBM RILs, which is expected given the much greater number of individuals in the Syn14 population. PH varied from 109 to 211 cm in the IBM RILs and from 85 to 280 cm in the IBM Syn14 population. Additionally, the mean of the 92 (46 from each phenotypic tail) selected individuals in the IBM Syn14 population (198 cm), was shifted toward taller individuals relative to the IBM RILs (159 cm). This is consistent with dominance and heterosis for PH given that, on average, ∼50% of the loci will be heterozygous in the individual Syn14 plants, whereas the IBM RILs are highly inbred. FT varied from 751 to 1103 GDD in the IBM RILs and from 528 to 1158 GDD in the IBM Syn14 population. Similarly, the 92 selected individuals from the IBM Syn14 population showed a shift in the mean toward earliness (858 GDD) relative to the IBM RIL (906 GDD). This observation is also consistent with dominance and heterosis for FT.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phenotypic distributions for both measured traits. Distributions are shown for both the intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) recombinant inbred line (RIL) and Syn14 populations. Distributions for the IBM RILs are for one trial grown in the summer of 2011 at approximately 16,500 plants ha−1 and are averaged across two replicates. Distributions for the IBM Syn14 population include the 92 selected extreme individuals flowering time in (A) growing degree days (GDD) and (B) plant height. Purple indicates areas where the distributions overlap. Parental values for B73 and Mo17 are indicated by blue and black arrows, respectively.

Significant genetic variation was observed for the IBM lines grown in the IBM density trial for both traits measured (ANOVA, P < 2×10−16). However, a significant genotype × density interaction was also observed for FT (ANOVA, P = 0.03).

QTL detection in extreme individuals from the synthetic heterogeneous population

Using the BSA sequencing method in the IBM Syn14 population with a genome-wide significance threshold of 3.35, a total of 14 regions were identified to be significantly associated with FT (Figure 2A; Table 1). The two most significant regions found for FT were 10.8 Mb and 18.9 Mb in size and located on chromosomes 5 and 8, respectively. These regions were also the largest genomic regions identified. The Mo17 allele conferred earliness for 10 out of the 14 regions, one of which was the most significant region (second region on chromosome 8; Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genetic mapping of flowering time. (A) Shown are both bulk segregant analysis (BSA) sequencing and traditional linkage quantitative trait loci mapping methods for flowering time. Blue and gray profile, corresponding to the left y-axis, was from the analysis of frequency differences between extreme pools (BSA sequencing). Each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) position is estimated using supporting information from the 14 neighboring SNPs. The green dotted line indicates a 0.5% empirical outlier threshold for the BSA sequencing. Black (16,500 plants ha−1) and red (49,000 plants ha−1) LOD profiles, corresponding to the right y-axis, show traditional linkage mapping results in the intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) recombinant inbred lines (RILs) determined using R/qtl. Only chromosomes containing significant associations are displayed (LOD >3.61). (B) Differences in the B73 allele frequency between the early and late pools are shown. Each SNP position is estimated using supporting information from the 14 neighboring SNPs.

Table 1. Significant flowering time regions in intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) Syn14 and IBM recombinant inbred lines.

Chromosome Left Position Right Position Most Significant Position Length (kb) Density (Plants ha−1) p-value Average Allelic Effect ([Mo17-B73]/2)c % Variation Explained Method
1a,b 11,100,000 21,850,000 13,450,000 10,750 49,000 1.18e-5 13.7 4.58 LM
1a,b 15,150,000 19,050,000 15,950,000 3900 16,500 6.71e-10 18.4 8.27 LM
1a,b 17,714,079 22,596,124 18,463,651 4882 16,500 7.65e-5 (+) BSAS
1 180,711,478 183,050,137 181,687,511 2339 16,500 5.06e-5 (−) BSAS
2 19,435,989 19,451,856 19,443,208 16 16,500 1.44e-4 (−) BSAS
2a 233,150,000 234,950,000 234,650,000 1800 16,500 1.42e-7 15.5 5.79 LM
2a 233,684,368 234,219,869 234,209,964 536 16,500 3.85e-5 (+) BSAS
4 14,822,931 17,108,700 16,180,806 2286 16,500 2.39e-4 (−) BSAS
4 216,050,000 225,100,000 223,100,000 9050 49,000 7.95e-7 16.5 5.98 LM
5 127,205,233 127,239,082 127,215,227 34 16,500 3.09e-4 (+) BSAS
5 175,599,023 186,393,293 178,591,431 10,794 16,500 7.97e-6 (−) BSAS
5 212,950,000 214,450,000 214,150,000 1500 49,000 6.37e-7 17.1 6.09 LM
6 146,682,333 147,926,947 146,815,395 1245 16,500 3.92e-5 (+) BSAS
7 27,603,027 27,613,362 27,607,683 10 16,500 4.22e-4 (−) BSAS
7 39,302,108 39,309,960 39,306,816 8 16,500 3.20e-4 (−) BSAS
8 18,487,954 21,420,111 21,411,057 2932 16,500 4.69e-5 (−) BSAS
8a,b 123,504,621 142,361,278 131,086,800 18,857 16,500 4.13e-8 (−) BSAS
8a,b 124,350,000 134,700,000 131,250,000 10,350 49,000 1.11e-7 −18.3 7.02 LM
8a,b 127,700,000 133,050,000 131,250,000 5350 16,500 6.94e-16 −30.7 15.29 LM
8 143,700,000 144,300,000 144,050,000 600 16,500 3.07e-9 20.8 7.56 LM
9 3,750,000 6,400,000 5,250,000 2650 16,500 4.92e-6 13.7 4.23 LM
9b 17,650,000 24,350,000 22,600,000 6700 49,000 6.02e-9 19.2 8.61 LM
9b 18,650,000 24,250,000 20,550,000 5600 16,500 1.15e-8 17.2 6.94 LM
9 152,250,000 153,550,000 152,750,000 1300 49,000 2.23e-7 −16.8 6.65 LM
10 87,300,000 94,200,000 92,600,000 6900 16,500 9.07e-9 −17.1 7.05 LM
10 99,225,452 102,316,547 102,314,009 3091 16,500 1.61e-4 (−) BSAS
10 132,510,585 132,547,745 132,528,197 37 16,500 1.12e-4 (−) BSAS
10 144,950,000 146,250,000 146,050,000 1300 16,500 7.17e-6 −12.8 4.07 LM

Regions were identified using the bulk segregant analysis sequencing (BSAS) method using 92 phenotypically extreme individuals from the intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) Syn14 population and linkage mapping (LM) with 8224 bin markers for 224 IBM recombinant inbred lines grown in two replications at densities of approximately 16,500 and 49,000 plants ha−1 in one environment. Also included are the left and right boundary positions, the most significant marker position, size of the interval, p-value of the most significant position, estimated QTL effect, and percent variation explained by each RIL QTL.

a

Shared regions between the two populations.

b

Shared regions between densities.

c

Only directionality of allele frequency shift is reported for regions identified by BSAS in the IBM Syn14.

The BSA sequencing method was also applied to the IBM Syn14 population for PH. A total of 13 regions were identified to be associated with PH at a significance threshold of 6.34 (Figure 3A; Table 2). The two most significant regions found for PH were 21.2 Mb and 9.7 Mb in size and located on chromosomes 4 and 6, respectively. Seven of the 13 regions were located on chromosome 9 alone. Of the regions identified, B73 conferred the tall allele for 4 out of the 13 regions (Figure 3B). However, for the three most significant regions located on chromosomes 4, 6, and 9, Mo17 contributed the tall allele.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Genetic mapping of plant height. (A) Shown are both bulk segregant analysis (BSA) sequencing and traditional linkage quantitative trait loci mapping methods for plant height. Blue and gray profile, corresponding to the left y-axis, was from analysis of frequency differences between extreme pools (BSA sequencing). Each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) position is estimated using supporting information from the 14 neighboring SNPs. The green dotted line indicates a 0.5% empirical outlier threshold for the BSA sequencing. Black (16,500 plants ha−1) and red (49,000 plants ha−1) LOD profiles, corresponding to right y-axis, show linkage mapping results in the intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) recombinant inbred lines (RILs) determined using R/qtl. Only chromosomes containing significant associations are displayed (LOD >3.68). (B) Differences in the B73 allele frequency between the tall and short pools are shown. Each SNP position is estimated using supporting information from the 14 neighboring SNPs.

Table 2. Significant plant height regions in intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) Syn14 and IBM recombinant inbred lines.

Chromosome Left Position Right Position Most Significant Position Length (kb) Density (Plants ha−1) p-value Average Allelic Effect ([Mo17-B73]/2)c % Variation Explained Method
1 202,350,000 207,100,000 206,250,000 4750 16,500 3.93e-6 4.8 6.57 LM
3a,b 124,500,000 149,550,000 129,050,000 25,050 49,000 1.88e-5 −4.8 5.69 LM
3a,b 131,761,170 133,787,782 133,783,580 2027 16,500 1.62e-7 (−) BSAS
4 5,650,000 10,550,000 9,850,000 4900 16,500 3.49e-6 4.9 6.65 LM
4 205,171,472 226,328,731 215,273,358 21,157 16,500 4.24e-11 (+) BSAS
5 175,750,134 175,756,910 175,754,067 7 16,500 1.18e-7 (−) BSAS
5 180,878,329 180,885,452 180,882,909 7 16,500 3.11e-7 (−) BSAS
6 138,185,595 147,926,947 143,999,660 9741 16,500 1.39e-12 (+) BSAS
8 92,560,823 92,576,189 92,568,159 15 16,500 1.92e-7 (−) BSAS
9 4,950,000 5,650,000 5,250,000 700 49,000 7.36e-7 5.7 7.87 LM
9 38,353,868 38,359,043 38,357,148 5 16,500 3.18e-7 (+) BSAS
9 61,337,181 61,343,573 61,340,803 6 16,500 3.54e-7 (+) BSAS
9 81,804,594 82,892,514 81,814,361 1088 16,500 4.25e-7 (+) BSAS
9a,b 96,000,000 105,050,000 99,050,000 9050 16,500 1.89e-11 7.2 15.19 LM
9a,b 96,450,000 105,050,000 99,050,000 8600 49,000 1.08e-11 7.7 16 LM
9a,b 100,914,404 103,222,106 100,917,919 2308 16,500 3.36e-7 (+) BSAS
9 113,791,080 114,932,420 114,276,702 1141 16,500 7.11e-8 (+) BSAS
9 121,580,239 125,181,457 122,087,889 3601 16,500 7.3e-9 (+) BSAS
9 130,719,322 130,920,301 130,885,891 201 16,500 1.67e-7 (+) BSAS

Regions were identified using the bulk segregant analysis sequencing (BSAS) method using 92 phenotypically extreme individuals from the intermated B73 × Mo17 (IBM) Syn14 population and linkage mapping (LM) with 8224 bin markers for 224 IBM recombinant inbred lines grown in two replications at densities of approximately 16,500 and 49,000 plants ha−1 in one environment. Also included are the left and right boundary positions, the most significant marker position, size of the region, p-value of the most significant position, estimated QTL effect, and percent variation explained by each RIL QTL.

a

Shared regions between the two populations.

b

Shared regions between densities.

c

Only directionality of allele frequency shift is reported for regions identified by BSAS in the IBM Syn14.

QTL detection using linkage mapping with RILs

Data from the low density (approximately 16,500 plants ha−1) planting of the IBM RILs in 2011 were used for the detection of QTL for both FT and PH. Eight regions were identified for FT (LOD > 3.67; Figure 2A) on chromosomes 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10, with the most significant region being located on chromosome 8. Genetic positions were converted to physical positions to determine the relative size for each of the regions identified (Table 1). The size of the 1.5 LOD intervals for these regions varied in size from 600 kb to 6.9 Mb in length. The estimated parental effects of B73 for five of the eight regions identified were toward earliness. Additionally, three QTL were identified for PH (LOD > 3.7; Figure 3A) on chromosomes 1, 4, and 9, with the most significant region located on chromosome 9. The 1.5 LOD intervals for these identified regions varied from 4.9 Mb to 9.1 Mb (Table 2). The estimated parental effects of B73 for the three regions identified were toward shorter plants. Despite the relatively high heritability of the two traits measured, the QTL model only explained 54% and 30% of the variation for FT and PH, respectively.

Data from the high density (approximately 49,000 plants ha−1) planting of the IBM RILs in 2011 were also used for the detection of QTL for both FT and PH. A total of six regions were identified for FT (LOD > 3.66) located on chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9. The 1.5 LOD intervals for these regions varied from 1.3 Mb to 10.8 Mb in length (Table 1; Figure 2A). The estimated parental effects of B73 for four of the six regions identified were toward earliness. Additionally, of the six regions identified, QTL located on chromosomes 1 (11.1 Mb–21.85 Mb), 8 (124.35 Mb–131.25 Mb), and 9 (17.65 Mb–24.35 Mb) coincided with QTL identified in the low-density treatment (Table 1) and shared the same directionality of estimated effects. A total of three regions were identified for PH (LOD > 3.62) located on chromosomes 3 and 9, with 1.5 LOD intervals ranging from 700 kb to 25.1 Mb in length (Table 2; Figure 3A). The estimated parental effects of B73 for one of the three regions identified were toward taller plants. Additionally, one QTL located on chromosome 9 (96.45 Mb–105.05 Mb) coincided with QTL identified in the low-density treatment (Table 2) and shared the same directionality of estimated effects.

Overlapping QTL region analysis

Overlapping regions between QTL detected in the Syn14 and low-density IBM set were declared if the physical positions of a 1.5 LOD interval from the traditional linkage mapping in the IBM RIL population fell within the boundaries of a region identified using the BSA sequencing method. Based on the physical position of the 1.5 LOD interval and the boundaries of the BSA sequencing method overlap, three regions located on chromosomes 1, 2, and 8 were identified for FT. The 1.5 LOD interval for linkage mapping extended into the significant region identified using BSA sequencing on chromosome 1. The 1.5 LOD interval for linkage mapping was contained within the significant region identified using BSA sequencing for chromosome 8, whereas the 1.5 LOD interval encompassed the BSA sequencing region on chromosome 2. The estimated effects for the IBM RIL QTL regions were consistent with the individual conferring the early or late allele in the IBM Syn14.

Two regions were identified as an overlapping region for PH. The QTL identified on chromosome 9 using linkage mapping in the 16,500 plants ha−1 treatment fell within the fourth region identified on chromosome 9 (100.9–103.22 Mb) using the BSA sequencing method. None of the other 12 regions identified using the Syn14 coincided with QTL found using traditional linkage mapping in the IBM RILs at this density. There was an additional overlap found between the 49,000 plant ha−1 IBM treatment and the IBM Syn14 on chromosome 3 (125–150 Mb). As with flowering time, the directionality of the estimated effects for the IBM QTL was consistent with the individual conferring the short or tall parental allele in the IBM Syn14.

Discussion

This study used a BSA sequencing approach to identify QTL for FT and PH in a large synthetic population. When compared to QTL from the IBM RIL population derived from the same parents, three regions of concordance were observed between the two populations for FT and two for PH. The BSA sequencing on the Syn14 population identified a larger number of QTL for FT and PH relative to QTL identified in the RIL population. It has been shown that in instances where a trait is highly polygenic with moderate effects, larger mapping populations are beneficial to increase statistical power and prevent overestimation of QTL effects (Beavis 1998; Xu 2003; Broman 2001). The population size of the IBM Syn14 relative to IBM RILs could have potentially increased the power to detect additional moderate effect QTL. This has also been shown through power analysis simulations examining the relative effect of population size on QTL detection using BSA (Magwene et al. 2011). Additionally, in populations that have higher numbers of recombination between genotypes, it is expected that repulsion and coupling phase linkages will be broken, allowing for greater power to detect QTL. In the IBM RIL population there are, on average, 57 effective recombination events per individual (Fu et al. 2006). Using the known average effective recombination events in the IBM RIL population and the expansion equations x[j/2 + (2i−1)/2i] and x[(2i+1 −1)/2i] outlined by Beissinger et al. (2013), where i is the number of generations a line has been inbred and j is the number of generations of intermating, we can estimate the average effective recombination events to be approximately 152 per individual in the IBM Syn14 population (Beissinger et al. 2013; Teuscher et al. 2005). Thus, the effective recombination in the IBM Syn14 population is more than twice the amount observed in the RILs. These considerations are consistent with recent studies using the maize US-NAM population and a large association panel. Coupling the use of large populations with the ability to utilize historical recombination, these studies elucidated the highly polygenic nature of PH and FT (Buckler et al. 2009; Peiffer et al. 2014).

In addition to QTL regions identified in the IBM Syn14 population not being identified in the IBM RIL population, the inverse was also observed. This was contrary to the expected result that all regions identified in the IBM RILs would have been detected using the larger IBM Syn14 population due to the prior considerations discussed. Although a larger population was grown, a relatively small portion of the allelic variation was sampled and used for conducting statistical tests. This is consistent with power analysis simulations conducted by Magwene and Colleagues (2011) examining at the effects of sample size and sequencing coverage on the detection of expected QTL. In these simulations, population and sample sizes and sequencing coverage of magnitude similar to the parameters used in this study resulted in among the lowest power to detect QTL. It is possible that the observed result was caused by a sampling effect generated by using the higher selection intensity chosen (∼0.5% selected in each tail out of 10,000 plants). This observation is primarily a sampling issue in that the individuals being used for the statistical test is a small sample of the substantially larger population one is trying to describe (Beavis 1998; Xu 2003). Using sample sizes of one order of magnitude larger is expected to have yielded the detection of more QTL within the IBM Syn14 population.

Although the lower planting density used for the IBM Syn14 was originally chosen to mitigate interplant competition between individuals measured, it was observed that genotype × density interactions existed for FT in the IBM RIL population. This was further examined by mapping QTL for the two densities separately. Of the eight QTL that were detected for FT at a planting density of 16,500 plants ha−1, only three coincided with QTL identified at a planting density of 49,000 plants ha−1. Of the regions that were found to overlap between the IBM RIL and Syn14 populations, those on chromosomes 1 and 8 were identified at both planting densities, whereas the region on chromosome 2 was identified for the lower planting density only (Figure 2A). Likewise, one region that overlapped between populations for PH was the only QTL identified to be shared between the two planting densities (Figure 3A). Although this region was the most significant region identified for linkage mapping at both densities, it was not the most significant region for the IBM Syn14 population. There was also an additional overlap between the Syn14 and RIL QTL identified in the higher density treatment that was not identified in the lower-density treatment (Figure 3A). These results suggest that either the overlapping regions between the two populations or the BSA sequencing method are density-independent.

Due to the correlation between FT and PH (Irish and Nelson 1991), regions that were significant for both traits in the two populations were identified. Overlaps between regions identified for the two traits existed on chromosomes 4 (205–226 Mb; PH in Syn14 and FT in high density RIL), 5 (176–186 Mb; PH and FT in Syn14), 6 (138–147 Mb; PH and FT in Syn14), and 9 (4–6 Mb; FT in low-density RIL and PH in high-density RIL). In each of these instances, when B73 conferred the early allele, Mo17 conferred the tall allele, or vice versa. This is consistent with the expectation that when overlap between regions identified for the two traits was present, their parental contributions would be in opposite directions (i.e., short plants would flower earlier).

A comprehensive list of 149 a priori candidate genes associated with FT was previously compiled for comparison to homologous sequences in maize (Chen et al. 2012). This list was used to search for BSA sequencing QTL overlapping FT candidate genes. Three putative FT genes fell within a 18.9-Mb region on chromosome 8, one of which, GRMZM2G700665, ZmRap2.7, and its regulatory element (Vgt1) 70 kb upstream have been previously shown to be associated with FT in maize (see Figure S1H) (Salvi et al. 2007). The maize homolog for EMF1 (Aubert et al. 2001) and ZmRap2.7 both fell within the overlapping region between the two mapping methods. A third gene GRMZM2G363429, a homolog of BR6ox2 (Shimada et al. 2003), while not contained within the overlapping region between the two mapping methods, was still contained in a region identified using the BSA sequencing method on chromosome 8. In total, 9 of the 14 regions identified either contained or were within 5 Mb of putative candidate flowering time genes (see Figure S1).

Regions identified for PH were compared to physical locations of known maize dwarf mutants and genes annotated for involvement with synthesis, transport, metabolism, and signaling of gibberellins and brassinosteroids. Both of these signaling pathways have been shown to have an impact on plant height (Fernandez et al. 2009). Of the regions identified for PH, only one region coincided with a candidate gene, whereas two others fell within 5 Mb of putative candidate PH genes. GRMZM2G017606, a maize homolog of shi (Fridborg et al. 1999), fell within the 21.2 Mb region identified in the Syn14 population on chromosome 4 (see Figure S2).

Additionally, a recent publication (Peiffer et al. 2014) identified PH-associated QTL and quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) using joint-linkage QTL mapping and a joint-linkage-assisted genome-wide association study (GWAS) within the maize US-NAM population, along with GWAS in the maize North Central Region Plant Introduction Station (NCRPIS) diversity panel. The NAM population shares its reference line B73 (McMullen et al. 2009) with the two populations used in this study. The two most significant regions identified for PH using the BSA sequencing method, on chromosomes 4 and 6, coincided with regions identified in the maize NAM population. The BSA sequencing region on chromosome 4 (205.2–226.3 Mb) encompassed a QTN identified by joint-linkage-assisted GWAS, whereas the region on chromosome 6 (138.2–147.9 Mb) encompassed two QTL identified using joint-linkage QTL mapping in the maize NAM population (Peiffer et al. 2014). Finally, the BSA sequencing region that overlapped with linkage mapping on chromosome 9 (100.9–103.2 Mb) fell within approximately 2.4 Mb from a joint-linkage QTL in the maize NAM population. For the NAM QTN identified on chromosome 4, B73 conferred the tall allele, whereas in the Syn14 population Mo17 was conferring the tall allele. This is consistent with the nearby NAM QTL (235 Mb) in which Mo17 is also conferring the tall allele. Conversely, whereas the two NAM QTL located on chromosome 6 were in repulsion phase with one another, their cumulative additive effect was in favor of Mo17 conferring the tall allele. Both this region and that on chromosome 9 are consistent with the findings in the IBM Syn14 population.

Likewise, of the regions identified for FT with BSA sequencing, three coincided with regions identified using joint-linkage QTL mapping in the maize US-NAM population. FT-associated NAM markers located on chromosomes 1 and 8 (Buckler et al. 2009) were encompassed by regions identified in the Syn14 population. Finally, the 3-Mb region identified on chromosome 10 fell within approximately 500 Kb of an FT-associated NAM marker (Buckler et al. 2009). These colocalizations of QTL, for both of the traits examined in this study, further demonstrate the ability of using the BSA sequencing method in the context of a heterogeneous population such as the IBM Syn14 to dissect quantitative traits in maize.

The feasibility of BSA on whole genome sequencing has already been described in similar studies using model organisms such as yeast (Ehrenreich et al. 2010; Magwene et al. 2011). Additionally, this approach has also been recently used in other important agronomic systems such as rice (Takagi et al. 2013). All of these studies have demonstrated the ability for the rapid detection of QTL from next-generation sequencing on pooled samples. Methods that use BSA with other next-generation sequencing technologies such as RNAseq have also demonstrated the ability to map genes contributing to quantitative traits in agronomic crops such as maize and wheat (Liu et al. 2012; Trick et al. 2012). However, some limitations may still exist for these types of methods.

For instance, plant height in maize demonstrates a considerable amount of heterosis (Uzarowska et al. 2007). Additionally, within this experiment we observed a shift of the IBM Syn14 population toward taller individuals relative to the IBM RILs, suggesting a potential mode of dominance. Through simulations, it has been shown that BSA with whole genome sequencing methods have difficulty detecting weaker effect QTL demonstrating levels of dominance (Takagi et al. 2013). In extreme situations of overdominance, where phenotypic effects between two homozygous states are indistinguishable relative to the phenotypic effect of the heterozygous state, it is expected that such QTL would become undetectable, as would also be the case with traditional linkage mapping in inbred populations. In such cases, it would be beneficial to have genomic information on all selected individuals rather than a pooled sample, and thus heterozygous states would be distinguishable from homozygous states. In this study, it is possible that all detected sites had lower to no dominance effects, and with additional information on all selected individuals, more QTL contributing to PH and FT could have been detected. Therefore, for traits that have higher levels of dominance like plant height in maize, a single pooling method may not be as applicable.

Typical QTL mapping studies rely on crosses of two or a small number of lines, limiting the alleles that are sampled. Because the BSA sequencing method relies only on differences in allele frequency, it is expected that this method could be applied to different structured populations of maize, especially those that do not rely on a biparental lineage. Sequencing of pooled DNA samples has also been used to scan for genomic sweeps generated through the process of artificial selection for increased ear number, as well as seed size in maize populations with multiple founder lines (Beissinger et al. 2014; Hirsch et al. 2014). Using a modified Fst calculated between estimated allele frequencies from sequenced samples of pooled individuals from the latest cycle of selection compared to the pool of individuals from the original population, 28 genomic regions were found to be affected by the selection for ear number (Beissinger et al. 2014). When this same approach was applied to a population divergently selected for 30 generations for seed size, 23 regions were identified to be causative for seed size when comparing the large and small selected populations (Hirsch et al. 2014). When scanning for unidirectional selection from cycle 0 for both larger or smaller seed size, 63 and 27 regions were identified, respectively (Hirsch et al. 2014). In this context, the BSA sequencing method could potentially be thought of as a single-generation selection experiment. Although gametes were not allowed to recombine after each cycle of selection, allele frequencies are divergently driven in the two selected pools.

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a BSA sequencing approach to rapidly identify QTL for two traits important for the production of lignocellulosic ethanol in maize while also yielding a context for selection on genomic regions using a higher selection pressure concurrently with a large population size. Although the regions identified were too large for single gene identification, these could still potentially be used for molecular breeding efforts.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the USDA Hatch (WIS01639) and the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494). The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Footnotes

Supporting information is available online at www.g3journal.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/g3.115.017665/-/DC1

Sequences are available in the Sequence Read Archive at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (BioProject accession number PRJNA208216). Genotype counts and frequencies for the filtered SNP set are available for download from the Dryad Digital Repository ( http://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.2mn50).

Communicating editor: R. W. Doerge

Literature Cited

  1. Aubert D., Chen L., Moon Y. H., Martin D., Castle L. A., et al. , 2001.  EMF1, a novel protein involved in the control of shoot architecture and flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13: 1865–1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin D. F., Lee M., 1996.  Genetic resolution and verification of quantitative trait loci for flowering and plant height with recombinant inbred lines of maize. Genome 39: 957–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beavis W. D., 1998.  QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy, pp. 145–162 in Molecular dissection of complex triats, edited by A. H. Paterson . CRC Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beavis W. D., Grant D., Albertsen M., Fincher R., 1991.  Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with qualitative genetic loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 141–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beissinger T. M., Hirsch C. N., Sekhon R. S., Foerster J. M., Johnson J. M., et al. , 2013.  Marker density and read depth for genotyping populations using genotyping-by-sequencing. Genetics 193: 1073–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beissinger T. M., Hirsch C. N., Vaillancourt B., Deshpande S., Barry K., et al. , 2014.  A genome-wide scan for evidence of selection in a maize population under long-term artificial selection for ear number. Genetics 196: 829–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y., 1995.  Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bohn M., Schulz B., Kreps R., Klein D., Melchinger A. E., 2000.  QTL mapping for resistance against the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis H.) in early maturing European dent germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 907–917. [Google Scholar]
  9. Broman K. W., 2001.  Review of statistical methods for QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Lab Anim. (NY) 30: 44–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Broman K. W., Wu H., Sen S., Churchill G. A., 2003.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buckler E. S., Holland J. B., Bradbury P. J., Acharya C. B., Brown P. J., et al. , 2009.  The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burton A. L., Johnson J., Foerster J., Hanlon M. T., Kaeppler S. M., et al. , 2015.  QTL mapping and phenotypic variation of root anatomical traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 128: 93–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardinal A. J., Lee M., Sharapova N., Woodman-Clikeman W. L., Long M. J., 2001.  Genetic mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci for resistance to stalk tunneling by the European corn borer in maize. Crop Sci. 41: 835–845. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chardon F., Virlon B., Moreau L., Falque M., Joets J., et al. , 2004.  Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics 168: 2169–2185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen C., DeClerck G., Tian F., Spooner W., McCouch S., et al. , 2012.  PICARA, an analytical pipeline providing probabilistic inference about a priori candidates genes underlying genome-wide association QTL in plants. PLoS ONE 7: e46596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehrenreich I. M., Torabi N., Jia Y., Kent J., Martis S., et al. , 2010.  Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 464: 1039–1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Elshire R. J., Glaubitz J. C., Sun Q., Poland J. A., Kawamoto K., et al. , 2011.  A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6: e19379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernandez M. G. S., Becraft P. W., Yin Y., Lubberstedt T., 2009.  From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci. 14: 454–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fridborg I., Kuusk S., Moritz T., Sundberg E., 1999.  The Arabidopsis dwarf mutant shi exhibits reduced gibberellin responses conferred by overexpression of a new putative zinc finger protein. Plant Cell 11: 1019–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fu Y., Wen T. J., Ronin Y. I., Chen H. D., Guo L., et al. , 2006.  Genetic dissection of intermated recombinant inbred lines using a new genetic map of maize. Genetics 174: 1671–1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fujino K., Sekiguchi H., Matsuda Y., Sugimoto K., Ono K., et al. , 2008.  Molecular identification of a major quantitative trait locus, qLTG3–1, controlling low-temperature germinability in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 12623–12628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Himmel M. E., Ding S. Y., Johnson D. K., Adney W. S., Nimlos M. R., et al. , 2007.  Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirsch C. N., Flint-Garcia S. A., Beissinger T. M., Eichten S. R., Deshpande S., et al. , 2014.  Insights into the effects of long-term artificial selection on seed size in maize. Genetics 198: 409–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hussain T., Tausend P., Graham G., Ho J., 2007.  Registration of IBM2 SYN10 doubled haploid mapping population of maize. J. Plant Registrations 1: 81. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hyten D. L., Smith J. R., Frederick R. D., Tucker M. L., Song Q., et al. , 2009.  Bulked segregant analysis using the GoldenGate assay to locate the Rpp3 locus that confers resistance to soybean rust in soybean. Crop Sci. 49: 265–271. [Google Scholar]
  26. Irish E. E., Nelson T. M., 1991.  Identification of multiple stages in the conversion of maize meristems from vegetative to floral development. Development 112: 891–898. [Google Scholar]
  27. Langmead B., Trapnell C., Pop M., Salzberg S. L., 2009.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10: R25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee M., Sharapova N., Beavis W. D., Grant D., Katt M., et al. , 2002.  Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 453–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., et al. , 2009.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu S., Yeh C. T., Tang H. M., Nettleton D., Schnable P. S., 2012.  Gene mapping via bulked segregant RNA-Seq (BSR-Seq). PLoS ONE 7: e36406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lorenz A. J., Coors J. G., 2008.  What can be learned from silage breeding programs? Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 148: 261–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lorenz A. J., Coors J. G., de Leon N., Wolfrum E. J., Hames B. R., et al. , 2009.  Characterization, genetic variation, and combining ability of maize traits relevant to the production of cellolosic ethanol. Crop Sci. 49: 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lubberstedt T., Melchinger A. E., Schon C. C., Utz H. F., Klein D., 1997.  QTL mapping in testcrosses of European flint lines of maize: I. Comparison of different testers for forage yield traits. Crop Sci. 37: 421–429. [Google Scholar]
  34. Magwene P. M., Willis J. H., Kelly J. K., 2011.  The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7: e1002255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McMullen M. D., Kresovich S., Villeda H. S., Bradbury P., Li H., et al. , 2009.  Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325: 737–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Metzker M. L., 2010.  Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 31–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Michelmore R. W., Paran I., Kesseli R. V., 1991.  Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 9828–9832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Miura K., Lin S. Y., Yano M., Nagamine T., 2001.  Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling low temperature germinability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed. Sci. 51: 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  39. Murray S. C., Ronney W. L., Mitchell S. E., Sharma A., Kleinaa P. E., et al. , 2008.  Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock II. QTL for stem and leaf structural carbohydrates. Crop Sci. 48: 2180–2193. [Google Scholar]
  40. Peiffer J. A., Romay M. C., Gore M. A., Flint-Garcia S. A., Zhang Z., et al. , 2014.  The genetic architecture of maize height. Genetics 196: 1337–1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Perlack, R. D., and B. J. Stokes, 2011 U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry, p. 227p in ORNL/TM-2011/224, edited by U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. [Google Scholar]
  42. Quarrie S. A., Lazic-Jancic V., Kovacevic D., Steed A., Pekic S., 1999.  Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 50: 1299–1306. [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team, 2014 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
  44. Ritter K. B., Jordan D. R., Chapman S. C., Godwin I. D., Mace E. S., et al. , 2008.  Identification of QTL for sugar-related traits in a sweet x grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) recombinant inbred population. Mol. Breed. 22: 367–384. [Google Scholar]
  45. Salvi S., Sponza G., Morgante M., Tomes D., Niu X., et al. , 2007.  Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 11376–11381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanghai-Maroof M. A., Soliman K. M., Jorgensen R. A., Allard R. W., 1984.  Ribosomal DNA spacer-length plymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 8014–8018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schnable P. S., Ware D., Fulton R. S., Stein J. C., Wei F., et al. , 2009.  The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326: 1112–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shimada Y., Goda H., Nakamura A., Takatsuto S., Fujioka S., et al. , 2003.  Organ-specific expression of brassinosteroid-biosynthetic genes and distribution of endogenous brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 131: 287–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Solomon B. D., Barnes J. R., Halvorsen K. E., 2007.  Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 31: 416–425. [Google Scholar]
  50. Takagi H., Abe A., Yoshida K., Kosugi S., Natsume S., et al. , 2013.  QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 74: 174–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tang J. H., Teng W. T., Yan J. B., Ma X. Q., Meng Y. J., et al. , 2007.  Genetic dissection of plant height by molecular markers using a population of recombinant inbred lines in maize. Euphytica 155: 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  52. Teuscher F., Guiard V., Rudolph P. E., Brockmann G. A., 2005.  The map expansion obtained with recombinant inbred strains and intermated recombinant inbred populations for finite generation designs. Genetics 170: 875–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Trick M., Adamski N. M., Mugford S. G., Jiang C. C., Febrer M., et al. , 2012.  Combining SNP discovery from next-generation sequencing data with bulked segregant analysis (BSA) to fine-map genes in polyploid wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 12: 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Turner T. L., Stewart A. D., Fields A. T., Rice W. R., Tarone A. M., 2011.  Population-based resequencing of experimentally evolved populations reveals the genetic basis of body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 7: e1001336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2014 Crop Production, 2013 Summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/CropProdSu//2010s/2014/CropProdSu-01-10-2014.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  56. Uzarowska A., Keller B., Piepho H. P., Schwarz G., Ingvardsen C., et al. , 2007.  Comparative expression profiling in meristems of inbred-hybrid triplets of maize based on morphological investigations of heterosis for plant height. Plant Mol. Biol. 63: 21–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Venuprasad R., Dalid C. O., Del Valle M., Zhao D., Espiritu M., et al. , 2009.  Identification and characterization of large-effect quantitative trait loci for grain yield under lowland drought stress in rice using bulk-segregant analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 177–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu S., 2003.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. Genetics 165: 2259–2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yuan J. S., Tiller K. H., Al-Ahmad H., Stewart N. R., Stewart C. N., Jr, 2008.  Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci. 13: 421–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zeileis A., Grothendieck G., 2005.  zoo: S3 infrastructure for regular and irregular time series. J. Stat. Softw. 14: 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang Y., Li Y., Wang Y., Peng B., Liu C., et al. , 2011.  Correlation and QTL detection in maize family per se and testcross progenies for plant height and ear height. Plant Breed. 130: 617–624. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao Q., Huang X., Lin Z., Han B., 2010.  SEG-Map: a novel software for genotype calling and genetic map construction from next-generation sequencing. Rice 3: 98–102. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES