Abstract
The WRKY transcription factors have been reported to be involved in various plant physiological and biochemical processes. In this study, we successfully assembled 10 unigenes from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of wheat and designated them as TaWRKY44–TaWRKY53, respectively. Among these genes, a subgroup I gene, TaWRKY44, was found to be upregulated by treatments with PEG6000, NaCl, 4°C, abscisic acid (ABA), H2O2 and gibberellin (GA). The TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein was localized to the nucleus of onion epidermal cells, and TaWRKY44 was able to bind to the core DNA sequences of TTGACC and TTAACC in yeast. The N-terminal of TaWRKY44 showed transcriptional activation activity. Expression of TaWRKY44 in tobacco plants conferred drought and salt tolerance and transgenic tobacco exhibited a higher survival rate, relative water content (RWC), soluble sugar, proline and superoxide dismutase (SOD) content, as well as higher activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), but less ion leakage (IL), lower contents of malondialdehyde (MDA), and H2O2. In addition, expression of TaWRKY44 also increased the seed germination rate in the transgenic lines under osmotic stress conditions while exhibiting a lower H2O2 content and higher SOD, CAT, and POD activities. Expression of TaWRKY44 upregulated the expression of some reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related genes and stress-responsive genes in tobacco under osmotic stresses. These data demonstrate that TaWRKY44 may act as a positive regulator in drought/salt/osmotic stress responses by either efficient ROS elimination through direct or indirect activation of the cellular antioxidant systems or activation of stress-associated gene expression.
Keywords: abiotic stress tolerance, antioxidant systems, ROS elimination, stress-associated gene, wheat, WRKY
Introduction
As sessile organisms, plants are easily affected by various environmental stresses, including biotic and abiotic stresses. Abiotic stress conditions cause a devastating influence on plant yield under field conditions (Suzuki et al., 2014), with drought, salinity and low temperature as three of the most vital problems for agriculture because these abiotic stresses limit the plant from exhibiting its full genetic potential (Zhu, 2002). Plants have evolved complex mechanisms to increase their tolerance to these abiotic stresses through both physical adaptations and molecular and cellular changes in response to these stresses (Knight and Knight, 2001). To date, extensive research has focused on identifying key regulation components, including signal transduction receptors or effectors (Shen et al., 2006; Park et al., 2009), transcription factors (Dubos et al., 2010; Lata and Prasad, 2011; Chen et al., 2012) and various functional proteins related to physiological and metabolic responses under drought or salt stresses (Yonamine et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2011). Through binding to the cis-acting elements in the promoters of stress-related genes, transcription factors play vital roles in stress responses (Nakashima et al., 2009). Among them, plant WRKY transcription factors, one of the largest families of transcriptional regulators in plants, have been proven to play crucial roles in response to various stresses. After the initial reports on WRKY transcription factors (Ishiguro and Nakamura, 1994), three members (WRKY1, WRKY2, and WRKY3) were identified from parsley (Petroselinum crispum) and the name WRKY (pronounced “worky”) was coined (Rushton et al., 1996).
WRKY family proteins are transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved DNA-binding WRKY domain. The WRKY domain consists of 60 amino acid residues at the N-terminal and an atypical zinc-finger structure at the C-terminal. It was reported that the conserved WRKY amino acid sequences have variants, including WRRY, WSKY, WKRY, WVKY, or WKKY, in some WRKY proteins (Xie et al., 2005). The zinc-finger structure is either Cx4–5Cx22–23HxH or Cx7Cx23HxC (Rushton et al., 2010). The WRKY transcription factors were further divided into three groups based on the number of WRKY domains (two domains in Group I proteins and one in the others) and the structure of their zinc fingers (C2H2 in Group II proteins and C2HC in Group III proteins) (Eulgem et al., 2000). The WRKY factors have high binding affinity to the TTGACC/T promoter element sequence called the W-box sequence, which is common to numerous defense-associated genes. The TGAC core sequence of the W-box elements is important for WRKY binding, as demonstrated by numerous binding experiments (Ulker and Somssich, 2004; Ciolkowski et al., 2008).
Major advances in WRKY transcription factor function research have occurred over the past 20 years (Rushton et al., 2010). A massive amount of evidence has demonstrated that WRKY transcription factors participate in numerous physiological processes, including pathogen defense (Dong et al., 2003), sugar signaling (Sun et al., 2003), senescence (Zhou et al., 2011), trichome development (Johnson et al., 2002), root growth (Ren et al., 2010), and hormone signaling (Mao et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2014). In recent years, the physiological functions of WRKYs in abiotic stress have also been reported (Zhou et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2013). However, compared with the extensive progress on biotic stresses, the functional understanding of WRKY proteins in abiotic stress is limited (Niu et al., 2012). As a staple crop, wheat production is constrained by multi-environmental stresses, such as drought, salinity and extreme temperature (Hu et al., 2012). Therefore, to improve the stress tolerance of wheat through genetic engineering, the detailed mechanisms of abiotic stress responses in wheat must be clarified. As a hexaploid plant, some studies have indicated that there are at least 200 WRKY genes in wheat (Okay et al., 2014; Satapathy et al., 2014), but to date, less than one-third of WRKY genes have been cloned and only a few of them have been functionally analyzed. Therefore, identification and functional analysis of WRKYs in wheat remain a challenge. Overexpression of some WRKY genes conferring tolerance to abiotic stresses through activating the antioxidant system has been reported in other species, such as rice and Arabidopsis, but there have been limited studies in wheat due to its complex and large genome. In this work, we successfully assembled 10 new unigenes from the ESTs of wheat. Previous work has identified 43 genes named TaWRKY1-TaWRKY43 in wheat (Niu et al., 2012), in order to build a systematic naming system of WRKY genes in wheat, we designated these 10 genes as TaWRKY44-TaWRKY53, respectively. Among these genes, the expression of TaWRKY44 in transgenic tobacco plants was shown to confer drought/salt/osmotic tolerance through direct or indirect activation of cellular antioxidant systems or stress-associated genes to eliminate ROS accumulation.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and stress treatments
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Chinese Spring) seeds were sterilized and then germinated in sterile water and cultured in growth chambers (16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 25°C) for 10 days. For stress and signaling molecule treatments, uniform and healthy 10-day-old seedlings were steeped in and sprayed with sterile water, a 100 mM NaCl solution, a 20% PEG6000 solution, 100 μM ABA, 10 mM H2O2 and 5 μM GA and incubated under light for 24 h. Leaves from sterile water treatment were taken as a control. For organ expression analysis, roots, stems and leaves were collected from sterile seedlings, while pistils and stamens were collected from wheat plants in the growth chamber. Leaves were independently harvested at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h; immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen; and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.
Cloning and bioinformatic analysis of TaWRKYs
Total RNA from wheat seedlings was extracted using a RNAprep pure Plant Kit (DP432, Tiangen), and after the removal of genomic DNA by DNase I (Code No. 2212, Takara), 1 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA using a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (# K1691, Fermentas). The wheat ESTs were obtained from the DFCI wheat gene index database and NCBI to assemble 10 unigenes that were then amplified from wheat cDNA by PCR using specific primer pairs (Supplementary Table 1). The PCR products were purified by a TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (DP209, Tiangen), ligated to the pMD-18T plasmid (TakaRa) and then sequenced. After confirmation of the full-length sequence of TaWRKY44, a homology search was done in NCBI using BLASTp.
Subcellular localization of TaWRKY44
The complete coding sequence of TaWRKY44 without the stop codon was ligated into the pBI121-GFP vector after it was amplified by PCR using primer P1 (Supplementary Table 2) with XbaI and BamHI restriction sites to create a fusion construct (pBI121-TaWRKY44-GFP). After confirmation by sequencing, pBI121-TaWRKY44-GFP was introduced into onion (Allium cepa L.) epidermal cells by particle bombardment (PDS-1000, Bio-Rad). pBI121-GFP was used as a control. After incubation at 25°C for 24 h, the tissue was stained with DNA-specific nuclear stain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 min. Fluorescence microscopy images were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus FV500, http://www.olympus-global.com/).
Analysis of transcriptional activation in yeast cells
A transcription activation assay was performed in yeast strain AH109 according to the Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech). The full length coding region and truncated fragments of TaWRKY44 were generated by PCR using primers P2-P7 (Supplementary Table 2). The PCR products were cloned into the pGBKT7 vector using EcoRI and PstI sites and were named pBD–TaWRKY44-N, pBD–TaWRKY44-NW1, pBD–TaWRKY44-NW2, pBD–TaWRKY44, pBD–TaWRKY44-W2C, and pBD–TaWRKY44-C, respectively. Plasmid pGBKT7 (pBD) was used as a negative control. These constructs were transformed into yeast strain AH109 by the lithium acetate-method. After confirmation by screening on selective medium plates without tryptophan (SD/-Trp) and colony PCR, the positive colonies were transfered onto the SD/-His plates with or without X-α-D-Galactosidase (X-α-gal), and the growth status of the yeast cells were photographed after incubating the plates for 3 d to evaluate the transcription activation activities.
W-box binding assay of TaWRKY44 in yeast
A yeast one-hybrid assay was used to investigate whether TaWRKY44 binds to the W-box element. The full length coding region of TaWRKY44 was generated by PCR using primer P8 (Supplementary Table 2). The PCR products were cloned into the pGADT7 vector using EcoRI and BamHI sites to obtain pGADT7-TaWRKY44. A 18-bp oligonucleotide sequence containing three tandem repeat copies of the W-box element (5′-TTGACC-3′, the core sequence is underlined) was cloned into the pHIS2.0 vector using EcoRI and SacI sites to obtain the reporter vector pHIS2-W-box. Similarly, vectors pHIS2-mW-box1-5 (pHIS2-mW1-5) were obtained by mutating the core TGAC sequence of the W-box elements to TGAT, CGAC, TAAC, TGGC, or AAAA (the mutated sites are underlined). Oligonucleotides were obtained by direct annealing using primers P9-P14 (Supplementary Table 2). Using the lithium acetate-method, pGAD-TaWRKY44 and pHIS2-(m) W-box were co-transformed into yeast strain Y187, while pHIS2/pGAD-TaWRKY44, pHIS2/ pGADT7 and pHIS2-W-box/pGADT7 were also co-transformed as negative controls. The DNA-protein interaction was evaluated according to the growth status of yeast cells cultured on SD/-His/-Leu/-Trp plates with 0, 30, and 60 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT) for 3 d.
RT-PCR
After stress and signaling molecule treatments, the transcription levels of these 10 WRKY genes were monitored for 24 h using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The specificity of the primers (Supplementary Table 1) used in RT-PCR was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing. The cDNA was obtained following the procedures mentioned above. All of the reactions were performed for 30 cycles using TaKaRa DNA polymerase; TaActin or NtActin were used as internal controls.
Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR)
To investigate the expression levels of TaWRKY44 in response to various treatments in different wheat tissues, qRT-PCR was applied. Three biological replicates of cDNA prepared as mentioned above were used as the template for amplification. The qRT-PCR was carried out following the SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green, FP205, Tiangen) on a CFX Connect™ Optics Module (Bio-Rad) Real-Time PCR System. The PCR conditions were 95°C for 15 min followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 32 s. The primers (Supplementary Table 1) used in qRT-PCR were designed based on sequence characterization to avoid the highly conserved WRKY domains, and the efficiency and specificity of the primers were first confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, validated by melting curve analysis using CFX Manager Software and sequencing of the amplified PCR products. The expression of the TaActin gene was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative gene expression (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).
Plant transformation and generation of transgenic plants
To generate transgenic tobacco plants expressing TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein, plasmids pBI121-TaWRKY44-GFP, under control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter, and pBI121-GFP (VC) were transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404, respectively. Transgenic tobacco plants were generated using the leaf disc transformation method according to Horsch et al. (1985). The seeds from T0 transgenic plants were harvested and sown on MS medium containing kanamycin (100 mg L−1), and the kanamycin-resistant T1 seedlings were confirmed by amplification of the TaWRKY44 and GFP genes using primers P15-P16 (Supplementary Table 2). Three independent transgenic T2 line seedlings (OE-1, OE-7, and OE-35), almost all survived on MS medium containing 100 mg L−1 of kanamycin. The pBI121-GFP vector control line was used in the following experiments. Expression of TaWRKY44 in three of the selected putative transgenic plants was examined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using primers P16. Similarly, semi-quantitative RT-PCR expression analysis of NtActin using primer P17 (Supplementary Table 2), was used as an internal control.
Stress tolerance assays of the wild-type (WT), vector control (VC), and TaWRKY44 transgenic plants
Seed of WT, VC and three transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-7, OE-35) were surface sterilized with 75% (v/v) ethanol for 10 s and 10% (v/v) H2O2 for 10 min before they were sown on MS medium under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 25°C for 2 weeks and then were transplanted into containers filled with a mixture of soil and sand (3:1) for 3 weeks with regular watering. Five-week-old plants with similar growth state were used in the following experiments. For drought/salt stress tolerance assays, 30 seedlings from each line were withheld from watering for 3 weeks before re-watering for 1 week or were irrigated with 400 mM NaCl for 3 weeks. After 3 weeks of drought/salt stresses, the survival rates were calculated and the leaves were collected to measure the RWC; IL; MDA, proline and soluble sugar contents; H2O2 accumulation; and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT) activities. For the osmotic stress tolerance assay, 2-week-old seedlings were transplanted to MS with mannitol (300 mM) and NaCl (200 mM) for 1 week, as described above. Leaves were used to measure ROS accumulation and CAT, SOD and POD activities. Fifty sterilized seeds from each line were sown on MS with mannitol (0, 150, or 300 mM) and NaCl (0, 100 or 200 mM) for 2 week, and the germination rates were scored daily.
Analysis of proline, RWC, IL, MDA, soluble sugar, H2O2 accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities
The proline content was measured by the ninhydrin reaction method. Proline was extracted from approximately 0.5 g of fresh leaves homogenized in 5 mL of 3% suphosalicylic acid and heated at 100°C for 10 min, and then, 2 mL of the extracted solution was added into 2 mL of acetic acid and 2 mL of 2.5% acid ninhydrin reagent and heated at 100°C for 30 min; the color of the solution turned to red. After cooling to room temperature, 4 mL of methylbenzene was added to the solution and incubated for 10 min after 30 s of shaking. The methylbenzene solution was used as a control to determine the optical density of the supernatant organic phase at 520 nm. The RWC and IL were measured according to previous reports (Deng et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2013), and the MDA content was determined according to the thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-based colorimetric method as described by Draper et al. (1993), with slight modifications. The soluble sugar content was examined by the phenol reaction method according to a previous study (Kong et al., 2011), with little modification. Approximately 0.2 g of fresh leaves were boiled in 5 mL of distilled water for 30 min for extraction and then diluted with distilled water to 10 mL. Two milliliters of the diluted solution was mixed with 1 mL of 9% phenol and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. After standing for 30 min, distilled water was used as a control to determine the optical density of the aqueous extract at 485 nm. A standard curve was drawn to calculate the soluble sugar content. The activity of three antioxidant enzymes, CAT, POD, and SOD, and the content of H2O2 were spectrophotometrically measured using four detection kits (A001, A007, A084, and A064, Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Analysis of the downstream genes regulated by TaWRKY44
The control lines (WT and VC) and the transgenic lines cultured on MS medium were transplanted to MS medium with mannitol (300 mM) and NaCl (200 mM) for 1 week. The total RNA of the leaves was extracted to synthesize cDNA. The expressions of the 14 selected stress-related genes were detected using qRT-PCR. The NtActin gene (P17) was used as the internal control. The sequences of the qPCR primers are listed in Supplementary Table 2 (P18–P31).
Sequence and statistical analysis
Amino acid sequences were aligned by DNAMAN 8, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mega 5.0. The data were analyzed in Excel, and the mean values ±SD were calculated from three independent experiments. Student's t-test was applied for the significant difference statistical analysis.
Results
Identification of WRKY genes in wheat
In this work, ten new WRKY genes were identified from wheat and designated as TaWRKY44-TaWRKY53, respectively according to previous studies, and the characteristics and GenBank accession numbers of the WRKYs are provided in Supplementary Tables 3, 6. Multiple alignments of the deduced amino acid sequences of TaWRKY44-TaWRKY53 clearly showed that these proteins contained the conserved WRKY domain (Supplementary Figure 1). Phylogenetic analysis of these 10 TaWRKY genes compared to other WRKYs (The GenBank accession numbers showed in Supplementary Table 5) from various plants demonstrated that these 10 WRKY genes could be divided into three subgroups (Supplementary Figure 2). The expression patterns of the 10 WRKYs under abiotic stresses and plant hormone treatments were analyzed by RT-PCR (Supplementary Table 4). The results showed that TaWRKY44 was upregulated by multiple stress treatments, and TaWRKY44 was thus chosen for the further analysis of its role in abiotic stress responses. TaWRKY44 cDNA is 1212 bp, with an 1113-bp open reading frame (ORF), and the deduced TaWRKY44 protein contains 370 amino acid residues with a predicted relative molecular mass of 40.39 kDa and isoelectric point of 8.43. Evolutionary relationship analysis showed that the TaWRKY44 protein contains two conserved DNA-binding domains (WRKY domain) and a zinc finger region, indicating that it belongs to Group I. BLASTp analysis revealed that the amino acid sequence of TaWRKY44 had an 90% sequence identity with the putative WRKY transcription factor 4 (EMS63397.1) from Triticum urartu and an 87% sequence identity with putative WRKY transcription factor 4 (EMT16145.1) from Aegilops tauschii. These results indicated that TaWRKY44 is a member of the WRKY family from wheat.
Expression pattern of TaWRKY44 under various stress conditions
qRT-PCR was used to investigate the expression patterns of TaWRKY44 in different tissues and under various abiotic stresses and signaling molecule treatments. The results showed that TaWRKY44 was expressed in all tissues, with higher expression levels in leaves and roots and lower expression levels in stems, pistils and stamens (Figure 1A). TaWRKY44 was obviously up-regulated after treatments with PEG and NaCl. During ABA and H2O2 treatments, the expression of TaWRKY44 was gradually increased by 3.2-fold at 6 h and 2.9-fold at 12 h, respectively. Low temperature treatment led to a slight up-regulation, and GA treatment distinctly increased the expression of TaWRKY44 (Figures 1B–G). On the other hand, with no treatment, the expression level of TaWRKY44 had no obvious change (data not shown). These results demonstrated that the expression of TaWRKY44 was up-regulated by PEG, NaCl, ABA H2O2, and GA treatments.
Transcription activation activity of TaWRKY44
The yeast expression system was used to investigate whether TaWRKY44 possesses transcription activation activity. Yeast strain AH109 was transformed with fusion plasmids pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-N, pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-NW1, pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-NW2, pGBKT7-TaWRKY44, pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-W2C and pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-C, and pGBKT7 as a control. As shown in Figure 2A, the yeast cells transformed with pGBKT7- TaWRKY44- N grew well in His− medium. Meanwhile, yeast cells transformed with other plasmids could only survive on SD/-Trp medium. The result of LacZ staining showed that the yeast cells transformed with pGBKT7-TaWRKY44-N turned blue in the presence of X-α-gal. These results indicated that the N-terminal region of TaWRKY44 has transcription activation activity, whereas the full-length TaWRKY44 appears to lack this activity.
The TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein is localized to the nucleus
The 35S-TaWRKY44-GFP plasmid was generated using the pBI121-GFP vector to investigate its subcellular distribution. Fluorescence imaging showed that the TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein was localized exclusively to the nuclei of onion epidermal cells in a transient expression assay (Figure 2B). The control GFP was distributed through the cell. DAPI staining was used as a nuclear marker. The nuclear localization of TaWRKY44-GFP is consistent with its predicted function as a transcription factor.
TaWRKY44 binds to the TGAC and TAAC core sequence
Plant WRKY proteins have high binding affinity to various W-box elements with the TGAC core sequence in the promoters of numerous defense-associated genes (Yu et al., 2001). A yeast one-hybrid system was used to evaluate the binding specificity between TaWRKY44 and the W-box (TTGACC/T) element. The full-length ORF of TaWRKY44 was fused to the GAL4 activation domain of vector pGADT7, and the fused construct was co-transformed with pHIS2-W-box or the pHIS2-mW-box1-5 construct containing triple tandem repeats of the W-box and mutated W-box into yeast strain Y187 (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, all of the yeast cells transformed with the different combination of constructs described above could grow on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His medium without 3-AT. However in the presence of 60 mM 3-AT, only the cells co-transformed with pGADT7-TaWRKY44 and pHIS2-W-box grew well, and the cells co-transformed with pGADT7-TaWRKY44 and pHIS2-mW-box3 (TTAACC) grew poorly, while others were completely inhibited. These results suggest that TaWRKY44 could strongly bind with the W-box core sequence TTGACC, even when the core sequence TTGACC was mutated to TTAACC, it could still weakly bind with it and activate the reporter gene in yeast.
Generation of transgenic tobacco plants expressing TaWRKY44
As TaWRKY44 was up-regulated by NaCl and PEG treatment, transgenic tobacco plants expressing TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein were generated to examine the role of TaWRKY44 in salt and drought stress response, while the empty vector transformed into tobacco was served as a negative control. The ORF of TaWRKY44 was ligated into the modified pBI121-GFP expression vector under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. In total, 39 putative transgenic lines were confirmed by PCR. RT-PCR analysis showed that TaWRKY44 mRNA was detected in transgenic plants, but not in the WT and VC, and NtActin was used as an internal control (Figure 4A). Three transgenic T2 lines (OE-1, OE-7, and OE-35) had a nearly 100% germination rate on MS medium containing 100 mg L−1 of kanamycin, which were thought to be homozygous transgenic lines, were used for further stress tolerance test.
Expression of TaWRKY44 enhances drought/salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants
To investigate whether transgenic expression of TaWRKY44 was correlated with stress tolerance, the 5-week-old control lines (WT and VC) and transgenic line plants were subjected to drought/salt stress assays. For drought tolerance analysis, the 5-week-old plants were deprived of water for 3 weeks, followed by re-watering for 1 week. Leaf wilting was more evident in the WT and VC plants relative to the three transgenic lines after 3 weeks without watering (Figure 4B). For salt tolerance analysis, the 5-week-old plants were exposed to salt treatment (400 mM NaCl) for 3 weeks (Figure 4B). The survival rates of the transgenic lines were significantly higher than those of the control lines after drought/salt stresses (Figure 4C). These results indicated that the expression of TaWRKY44 could enhance drought/ salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco.
Expression of TaWRKY44 increases RWC, proline and soluble sugar accumulation and decreases MDA and IL under drought/salt stresses
That expression of TaWRKY44 enhanced drought and salt tolerance led us to determine the effects of the physiological status caused by TaWRKY44 expression. Result of RWC analysis, a credible evaluation of the plant water status, indicated that the activity of the plants under various environmental conditions was less reduced in transgenic lines after 3 weeks of drought/salt stress (Figure 5A). Proline is thought to play an important role as an osmotic-regulatory solute in plants subjected to hyperosmotic stresses, primarily through drought and soil salinity (Delauney and Verma, 1993). The proline content was higher in the transgenic lines after 3 weeks of drought/salt stress (Figure 5B). In addition, the soluble sugar levels exhibited a profile similar to that of proline (Figure 5C). These results showed that the transgenic lines possess more powerful resistance to hyperosmotic stresses compared to control lines. The MDA and IL levels, important indicators of membrane injury, were significantly lower in the transgenic lines relative to the control lines (Figures 5D,E), indicating that the WT and VC lines suffered from more severe membrane damage after drought/salt stress. Moreover, the transgenic lines showed no obvious difference with the control lines in these physiological indicators without stress treatment. These results demonstrated that the transgenic lines possess more powerful resistance to drought and salt stress.
Expression of TaWRKY44 increases antioxidant enzyme activity and decreases the H2O2 content under drought/salt stresses
Results of the MDA and IL levels indicated that the WT and VC lines suffered from more severe oxidative membrane damage after drought/salt stresses. Because enzymatic antioxidants could affect cellular ROS levels, we detected the levels of ROS and the activity of three significant antioxidant enzymes activities (SOD, POD, and CAT) in the leaves from the plants described above to further understand the relationships between enzymatic antioxidants and the influence of TaWRKY44 expression on drought and salt stress tolerance. The results showed that after drought/salt treatments, the SOD, POD, and CAT activities in transgenic plants were significantly higher than those in the control plants; meanwhile, the H2O2 levels were lower in the transgenic plants (Figure 7). In addition, under normal growth condition, the SOD, POD, and CAT activities in transgenic plants were slightly higher than in the control plants, but there is no obvious difference in the H2O2 levels between the transgenic plants and the control plants. These results indicated that expression of TaWRKY44 could influence the ROS levels by enhancing three significant antioxidant enzyme activities in the antioxidant system under drought/salt stress.
Expression of TaWRKY44 enhances osmotic tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants
To examine the osmotic stress tolerance of the transgenic plants, the control and transgenic lines were sown on MS medium containing mannitol (0, 150, or 300 mM) and NaCl (0, 100, or 200 mM) and the germination rate was monitored for 2 weeks before taking photographs. The results showed that the germination rates of the transgenic plants were obviously higher than those of the control plants grown on MS medium containing mannitol (150 or 300 mM) and NaCl (100 or 200 mM), while the plants grown on the MS medium without mannitol and NaCl had no significant difference between the control lines and transgenic lines (Figure 6). These results indicated that expression of TaWRKY44 enhanced osmotic tolerance during seed germination in transgenic tobacco plants.
Expression of TaWRKY44 decreases ROS accumulation and improves SOD and cat activities under osmotic stress
To further confirm the ability of transgenic tobacco plants to scavenge ROS, we detected the levels of ROS and three significant antioxidant activities in the leaves under osmotic stress. Two-week-old seedlings cultured on MS medium were transplanted to MS with mannitol (300 mM) and NaCl (200 mM) for 1 week. The results showed that without osmotic stress, there was no obvious difference in H2O2 accumulation and SOD, POD, and CAT activities between the control and transgenic plant seedlings; however, after mannitol and NaCl treatments, the SOD, POD, and CAT activities in the transgenic plants were significantly higher than in the control plants, but, the H2O2 levels were lower in the transgenic plants (Figure 7). These results indicated that the expression of TaWRKY44 could influence the ROS levels by enhancing the activity of three significant antioxidant enzymes in the antioxidant system under osmotic stresses.
TaWRKY44 regulates stress-responsive gene expressions under osmotic treatments
To gain further insights into the molecular mechanism underlying the enhanced drought/salt and osmotic resistance in transgenic tobacco plants, the expression levels of 14 ROS-related and stress-responsive genes were examined in the 2-week control and transgenic lines (OE-35) with or without 1 week of osmotic stress. We selected 14 genes listed below for this experiment: the genes encoding enzymes involved in ROS detoxification (NtSOD, NtAPX, NtCAT, NtPOX, and NtGST), enzyme genes for biosynthesis of polyamine (NtADC1 and NtSAMDC), sucrose (NtSPSA), or abscisic acid (ABA; NtNCED1), stress response proteins (NtERD10C, NtERD10D, and NtLEA5) and lipid-transfer protein genes (NtLTP1 and TobLTP1). Three-week-old seedlings, after 1 week of mannitol (300 mM) and NaCl (200 mM) treatment as described above, were used in this assay. Compared to the control plants, all of the stress-responsive genes analyzed were significantly upregulated in the transgenic line either when exposed to mannitol treatment, NaCl treatment or both, with the exception of NtERD10D and NtLEA5 (Figure 8). These results demonstrated that the expression of TaWRKY44 in tobacco enhances drought/salt/osmotic tolerance by inducing the expression of some ROS-related and stress-responsive genes.
Discussion
Although it has been well documented that WRKY transcription factors are tightly connected with various plant defense mechanisms and respond to various adverse environmental conditions, functional studies have only been performed for a few WRKYs in wheat, and evidence for the relationships between WRKY proteins and abiotic stresses remains limited compared to biotic stresses. Meanwhile, the mechanisms of non-WRKY genes that enhance plant drought and salt stresses by either efficient ROS elimination through the activation of the cellular antioxidant systems or the activation of the stress-associated genes have been extensively reported in Arabidopsis (Moon et al., 2003; Luo et al., 2009), Oryza sativa (Ning et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2012), Poncirus trifoliate (Huang et al., 2010, 2011), and wheat (Hu et al., 2012, 2013), but there is limited documentation of the function of WRKY proteins in wheat transcription processes.
In our present study, 10 new TaWRKY genes were identified from wheat. Phylogenetic analysis of these 10 TaWRKY genes compared to WRKYs from various plants demonstrated that these 10 WRKY genes could be divided into three subgroups (Supplementary Figure 2). Previous studies indicated that the Group I and group III WRKY genes were mainly involved in the abiotic stress response, while Group II WRKY genes were mainly involved in the response to biotic stresses, such as senescence, and a few studies have reported that an abiotic stress response, such as low Pi, was involved. BLASTp analysis revealed that TaWRKY44 had 90% sequence identity with the putative WRKY transcription factor 4 (EMS63397.1) from Triticum urartu and 87% sequence identity with putative WRKY transcription factor 4 (EMT16145.1) from Aegilops tauschii. However, no functional analyses of these two genes have been published to date. TaWRKY44 was upregulated by PEG, NaCl, cold (4°C), ABA, H2O2, and GA (Figure 1), which implied that TaWRKY44 might play important roles in plant abiotic stress response. Transcriptional activation analysis demonstrated that only the N-terminal region of TaWRKY44 has transcriptional activation activity, whereas the full-length and C-terminal region of TaWRKY44 appears lacking this activity (Figure 2A). It is possible that TaWRKY44 needs additional posttranslational modifications to exhibit its full function. Additional modifications of transcription factors for stress tolerance have rarely been reported in crops (Tang et al., 2012). In a previous study, the soybean NAC transcription factor GmNAC20 appears to function as both a transcriptional repressor and transcriptional activator, and its activity as an activator or a repressor depends on a conformational change or its interactions with other regulatory proteins (Hao et al., 2011). The Arabidopsis transcription factor AREB1 activates expression of ABRE-dependent downstream genes through an ABA-induced modification of the AREB1 protein (Fujita et al., 2005), which is consistent with our results. Previous research indicated that phosphorylation is an important way to activate WRKY proteins (Ishihama et al., 2011), and potential phosphorylation sites of the TaWRKY44 protein were found using the NetPhos 2.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/, data not shown). This result implies a possible regulation of TaWRKY44 activity by phosphorylation via different protein kinases. Consistent with its putative role as a transcription factor, the TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein was exclusively localized to the nuclei of onion epidermal cells in a transient expression assay similar to previous studies on other WRKY transcription factors (Figure 2B) (Lai et al., 2008). A yeast one-hybrid system was used to evaluate the binding specificity between TaWRKY44 and the W-box element (TTGACC/T), as in previous studies (Liu et al., 2013a; Zheng et al., 2013), and the results showed that TaWRKY44 had high affinity to the W-box core sequence TTGACC. Even when the core sequence was mutated to TTAACC, TaWRKY44 could still weakly bind to it and activate the reporter gene in yeast (Figure 3), suggesting that the G in TTGACC is not necessary for TaWRKY44 recognition. The induction of TaWRKY44 expression under abiotic stresses promoted us to further clarify the function of TaWRKY44 in abiotic stress tolerance. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing TaWRKY44-GFP fusion protein were subjected to drought and salt stress treatments to examine the role of TaWRKY44 in salt and drought stress responses like some previous studies (Hu et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014). The results indicated that the expression of TaWRKY44 increased the survival rate under drought and salt stresses in transgenic tobacco (Figure 4). This result is consistent with previous work on other WRKYs. For instance, TaWRKY10 confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco (Wang et al., 2013), expressing TaWRKY2 confers salt and drought tolerance, and expression of TaWRKY19 confers salt, drought and freezing tolerance in transgenic plants (Niu et al., 2012). The abo3 mutant lost drought tolerance compared to the wild type and was hypersensitive to ABA in both seedling establishment and seedling growth in Arabidopsis (Ren et al., 2010). Constitutive expression of BcWRKY46 in tobacco under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter reduced the susceptibility of transgenic tobacco to freezing, ABA, salt and dehydration stresses (Wang et al., 2012). On the basis of the phenotype analysis results, physiological and biochemical analysis was performed, and the results showed that the expression of TaWRKY44 increased RWC, proline and soluble sugar accumulation and decreased MDA and IL under drought/salt stresses (Figures 5A–E). Because IL is an indicator of the severity of a membrane injury and MDA is a product of oxidative attack on membrane lipids (Moore and Roberts, 1998), we concluded that less oxidative damage occurred in transgenic plants under drought and salt stress. We detected the H2O2 levels in transgenic and control lines before and after drought and salt stress, and the results showed that the H2O2 levels in the transgenic lines were obviously lower than in the control lines after drought and salt stress (Figure 7D). These results indicated that the oxidative damage scavenging systems in transgenic plants might work more effectively compared with WT and VC. To detoxify stress-induced ROS, plants have evolved a complex antioxidant system (Miller et al., 2010). Plants possess very efficient enzymatic antioxidant defense systems to protect plant cells from oxidative damage by scavenging ROS (Gill and Tuteja, 2010). SOD provides the first line of defense against ROS by catalyzing the dismutation of O to oxygen and H2O2, which is then scavenged by the coordinated action of CAT and POD (Blokhina et al., 2003). The activities of three significant antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and POD) were assessed in transgenic lines and control lines before and after drought and salt stresses. The results indicated that the activities of three significant antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT) were higher than those in the control lines (Figures 6A–C). These results were similar to previous studies (Huang et al., 2010, 2011; Kong et al., 2011) and demonstrated that the antioxidant enzyme systems were activated to reduce the ROS levels in transgenic lines after drought and salt stresses. Moreover, germination assay was performed to examine the osmotic stress tolerance of the transgenic plants, and the germination rates of the transgenic plants were significantly higher than those of the control plants grown on MS medium containing 150/300 mM mannitol and 100/200 mM NaCl (Figure 6) and had lower H2O2 levels and improved antioxidant enzyme systems compared to controls under osmotic stress (Figure 7).
To gain further insights into the mechanisms of action of TaWRKY44 in drought/salt/osmotic stresses at the molecular level, the expression levels of 14 ROS-related and stress-responsive genes were tested under osmotic stress; these include genes encoding enzymes for ROS detoxification (NtSOD, NtAPX, NtCAT, NtPOX, and NtGST); enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of polyamine (NtADC1 and NtSAMDC), sucrose (NtSPSA) or ABA (NtNCED1); stress-defensive proteins (NtERD10C, NtERD10D, and NtLEA5); and lipid-transfer protein genes (NtLTP1 and TobLTP1). It was found that all of the stress-responsive genes analyzed were significantly upregulated in the transgenic lines either when exposed to mannitol (300 mM) or NaCl (200 mM) treatment or both, with the exception of NtERD10D and NtLEA5, compared to the control plants (Figure 8). The expression levels of the genes encoding three antioxidant enzymes were upregulated in the TaWRKY44-expressing lines with or without stress treatments (Figure 8, NtSOD, NtCAT, and NtPOX2), which is consistent with the results for the antioxidant enzyme activities described above. This could be an explanation for the antioxidant enzymes activities and the H2O2 contents in the transgenic lines and controls under drought/salt/osmotic stresses. Although the elaborate mechanism underlying the up-regulation of these antioxidant genes has not been clearly understood, previous studies have shown that the WRKY transcription factors could regulate the expressions of ROS-related genes in Tamarix hispida (Zheng et al., 2013), wheat (Niu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013), soybean (Luo et al., 2013), and cotton (Yan et al., 2014) under various stresses. On the other hand, two genes (NtADC1 and NtSAMDC) related to the synthesis of polyamines, which are low-molecular-weight polycations that have been proven to be important stress molecules (Groppa and Benavides, 2008; Jang et al., 2009), were also induced in the transgenic lines relative to the control lines (Figure 8, NtADC1 and NtSAMDC). This polyamine function (osmotic regulator or membrane stabilizer) in stress response could provide another explanation for the enhanced tolerance seen in the transgenic lines. Previous studies demonstrated that SPSA is critical in the synthesis of sucrose in plants and plays an essential role in plant osmotic pressure; NtNECD1 plays an essential role in ABA biosynthesis regulation (Huang et al., 2010); NtLEA5 and NtERD10 (C/D) belong to the LEA protein family that protects and stabilizes macromolecules and/or cellular structures during plant stress responses (Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Liu et al., 2013b); and NtLTP1 and TobLTP1 encode the lipid-transfer proteins, which are involved in plant response to ABA, cold, drought and salt stresses (Torres-Schumann et al., 1992; Hu et al., 2013). The up-regulation of these genes implies that these proteins may act as the intermediates between TaWRKY44 and the phenotype under drought/salt/osmotic stresses. These results demonstrated that the mechanism of enhanced drought/salt/osmotic tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants is the increase of the expression levels of some ROS-related and stress-responsive genes.
In conclusion, a wheat Group I WRKY gene, TaWRKY44, was upregulated by PEG, NaCl, ABA, and H2O2 treatments. Expression of TaWRKY44 enhanced tolerance to drought, salt and osmotic in transgenic tobacco with increased RWC, proline and soluble sugar accumulation, decreased MDA and IL, improved antioxidant system and up-regulated transcription levels of ROS-related and stress responsive genes under various stresses. However, the elaborate mechanisms underlying these phenomena need to be clarified. Although whether these phenomena (compounds accumulation, changes in enzyme activity, genes expression etc.) were caused directly or indirectly by overexpressing TaWRKY44 cannot be concluded in this study, but these changes were absolutely produced by overexpressing TaWRKY44. In our study, we found that full-length of TaWRKY44 has no transcriptional activation activity, it is suggested that TaWRKY44 needs additional posttranslational modifications or interactions with its cofactors to exhibit its full function. Therefore, it is possible that the genes encoding cofactors of TaWRKY44 were also induced by stress conditions. The induced expression of these genes, together with constitutive expression of TaWRKY44, resulted in up-regulation of these stress-related genes, and the increased tolerance of transgenic tobacco to drought/salt/osmotic stresses. In the future, it is necessary to identify if TaWRKY44 could function directly as transcription factor through binding to the upstream sequence of these genes, result of which will shed light on the mechanisms of TaWRKY44-mediated stress tolerance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the grants from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2015ZX08002004-007; 2015ZX08010004-004), the International Collaboration Project of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant no. 2009DFB30340), and the Innovative Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2014QN124); Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant no. 2012014211075) and Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice in Wuhan University (Grant no. KF201302).
Glossary
Abbreviations
- 3-AT
3-Amino-1, 2,4-triazole
- ABA
Abscisic acid
- CaMV
Cauliflower mosaic virus
- CAT
Catalase
- DAPI
4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- GA
Gibberellin
- GFP
Green fluorescent protein
- IL
Ion leakage
- LEA
Late embryogenesis abundant
- MDA
Malonaldehyde
- MS
Murashige and Skoog
- OE
Overexpression
- ORF
Open reading frame
- POD
Peroxidase
- QRT-PCR
Real-time quantitative PCR
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- RT-PCR
Reverse transcription–PCR
- RWC
Relative water content
- SOD
Superoxide dismutase
- VC
Vector control
- WT
Wild type.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00615
References
- Blokhina O., Virolainen E., Fagerstedt K. V. (2003). Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 91, 179–194. 10.1093/aob/mcf118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Song Y., Li S., Zhang L., Zou C., Yu D. (2012). The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819, 120–128. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciolkowski I., Wanke D., Birkenbihl R. P., Somssich I. E. (2008). Studies on DNA-binding selectivity of WRKY transcription factors lend structural clues into WRKY-domain function. Plant Mol. Biol. 68, 81–92. 10.1007/s11103-008-9353-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delauney A. J., Verma D. S. (1993). Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 4, 215–223. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Deng X., Zhou S., Hu W., Feng J., Zhang F., Chen L., et al. (2013). Ectopic expression of wheat TaCIPK14, encoding a calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase, confers salinity and cold tolerance in tobacco. Physiol. Plant 149, 367–377. 10.1111/ppl.12046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong J., Chen C., Chen Z. (2003). Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 21–37. 10.1023/A:1020780022549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Draper H. H., Squires E. J., Mahmoodi H., Wu J., Agarwal S., Hadley M. (1993). A comparative evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 15, 353–363. 10.1016/0891-5849(93)90035-S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubos C., Stracke R., Grotewold E., Weisshaar B., Martin C., Lepiniec L. (2010). MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 573–581. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eulgem T., Rushton P. J., Robatzek S., Somssich I. E. (2000). The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 199–206. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujita Y., Fujita M., Satoh R., Maruyama K., Parvez M. M., Seki M., et al. (2005). AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE-dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 3470–3488. 10.1105/tpc.105.035659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gill S. S., Tuteja N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 909–930. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groppa M. D., Benavides M. P. (2008). Polyamines and abiotic stress: recent advances. Amino Acids 34, 35–45. 10.1007/s00726-007-0501-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao Y. J., Wei W., Song Q. X., Chen H. W., Zhang Y. Q., Wang F., et al. (2011). Soybean NAC transcription factors promote abiotic stress tolerance and lateral root formation in transgenic plants. Plant J. 68, 302–313. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04687.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horsch R. B., Fry J. E., Hoffmann N. L., Eichholtz D., Rogers S. G., Fraley R. T. (1985). A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227, 1229–1231. 10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu W., Huang C., Deng X., Zhou S., Chen L., Li Y., et al. (2013). TaASR1, a transcription factor gene in wheat, confers drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1449–1464. 10.1111/pce.12074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu W., Yuan Q., Wang Y., Cai R., Deng X., Wang J., et al. (2012). Overexpression of a wheat aquaporin gene, TaAQP8, enhances salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 2127–2141. 10.1093/pcp/pcs154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X. S., Liu J. H., Chen X. J. (2010). Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 10:230. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X. S., Luo T., Fu X. Z., Fan Q. J., Liu J. H. (2011). Cloning and molecular characterization of a mitogen-activated protein kinase gene from Poncirus trifoliata whose ectopic expression confers dehydration/drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 5191–5206. 10.1093/jxb/err229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishiguro S., Nakamura K. (1994). Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5′ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and beta-amylase from sweet potato. Mol. Gen. Genet. 244, 563–571. 10.1007/BF00282746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishihama N., Yamada R., Yoshioka M., Katou S., Yoshioka H. (2011). Phosphorylation of the Nicotiana benthamiana WRKY8 transcription factor by MAPK functions in the defense response. Plant Cell 23, 1153–1170. 10.1105/tpc.110.081794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang E. K., Min K. H., Kim S. H., Nam S. H., Zhang S., Kim Y. C., et al. (2009). Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in the signaling for polyamine biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 658–664. 10.1093/pcp/pcp009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang Y., Liang G., Yang S., Yu D. (2014). Arabidopsis WRKY57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid- and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell 26, 230–245. 10.1105/tpc.113.117838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson C. S., Kolevski B., Smyth D. R. (2002). TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a trichome and seed coat development gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a WRKY transcription factor. Plant Cell 14, 1359–1375. 10.1105/tpc.001404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knight H., Knight M. R. (2001). Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 262–267. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01946-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kong X., Pan J., Zhang M., Xing X., Zhou Y., Liu Y., et al. (2011). ZmMKK4, a novel group C mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in maize (Zea mays), confers salt and cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 1291–1303. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar G., Kushwaha H. R., Panjabi-Sabharwal V., Kumari S., Joshi R., Karan R., et al. (2012). Clustered metallothionein genes are co-regulated in rice and ectopic expression of OsMT1e-P confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance in tobacco via ROS scavenging. BMC Plant Biol. 12:107. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lai Z., Vinod K., Zheng Z., Fan B., Chen Z. (2008). Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY3 and WRKY4 transcription factors in plant responses to pathogens. BMC Plant Biol. 8:68. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lata C., Prasad M. (2011). Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4731–4748. 10.1093/jxb/err210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu R., Xu Y. H., Jiang S. C., Lu K., Lu Y. F., Feng X. J., et al. (2013a). Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins, positively involved in abscisic acid signalling, require a transcription repressor, WRKY40, to balance their function. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 5443–5456. 10.1093/jxb/ert307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Wang L., Xing X., Sun L., Pan J., Kong X., et al. (2013b). ZmLEA3, a multifunctional group 3 LEA protein from maize (Zea mays L.), is involved in biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 944–959. 10.1093/pcp/pct047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo X., Bai X., Sun X., Zhu D., Liu B., Ji W., et al. (2013). Expression of wild soybean WRKY20 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance and regulates ABA signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2155–2169. 10.1093/jxb/ert073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y., Liu Y. B., Dong Y. X., Gao X. Q., Zhang X. S. (2009). Expression of a putative alfalfa helicase increases tolerance to abiotic stress in Arabidopsis by enhancing the capacities for ROS scavenging and osmotic adjustment. J. Plant Physiol. 166, 385–394. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao P., Duan M., Wei C., Li Y. (2007). WRKY62 transcription factor acts downstream of cytosolic NPR1 and negatively regulates jasmonate-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 833–842. 10.1093/pcp/pcm058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller G., Suzuki N., Ciftci-Yilmaz S., Mittler R. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 453–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon H., Lee B., Choi G., Shin D., Prasad D. T., Lee O., et al. (2003). NDP kinase 2 interacts with two oxidative stress-activated MAPKs to regulate cellular redox state and enhances multiple stress tolerance in transgenic plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 358–363. 10.1073/pnas.252641899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore K., Roberts L. J., II. (1998). Measurement of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic. Res. 28, 659–671. 10.3109/10715769809065821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakashima K., Ito Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2009). Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol. 149, 88–95. 10.1104/pp.108.129791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ning J., Li X., Hicks L. M., Xiong L. (2010). A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 152, 876–890. 10.1104/pp.109.149856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu C. F., Wei W., Zhou Q. Y., Tian A. G., Hao Y. J., Zhang W. K., et al. (2012). Wheat WRKY genes TaWRKY2 and TaWRKY19 regulate abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 1156–1170. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02480.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okay S., Derelli E., Unver T. (2014). Transcriptome-wide identification of bread wheat WRKY transcription factors in response to drought stress. Mol. Genet. Genomics 289, 765–781. 10.1007/s00438-014-0849-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park S. Y., Fung P., Nishimura N., Jensen D. R., Fujii H., Zhao Y., et al. (2009). Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324, 1068–1071. 10.1126/science.1173041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren X., Chen Z., Liu Y., Zhang H., Zhang M., Liu Q., et al. (2010). ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 63, 417–429. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04248.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rushton P. J., Somssich I. E., Ringler P., Shen Q. J. (2010). WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 247–258. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rushton P. J., Torres J. T., Parniske M., Wernert P., Hahlbrock K., Somssich I. E. (1996). Interaction of elicitor-induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 15, 5690–5700. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satapathy L., Singh D., Ranjan P., Kumar D., Kumar M., Prabhu K. V., et al. (2014). Transcriptome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in wheat and their leaf rust responsive expression profiling. Mol. Genet. Genomics 289, 1289–1306. 10.1007/s00438-014-0890-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y. Y., Wang X. F., Wu F. Q., Du S. Y., Cao Z., Shang Y., et al. (2006). The Mg-chelatase H subunit is an abscisic acid receptor. Nature 443, 823–826. 10.1038/nature05176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun C., Palmqvist S., Olsson H., Borén M., Ahlandsberg S., Jansson C. (2003). A novel WRKY transcription factor, SUSIBA2, participates in sugar signaling in barley by binding to the sugar-responsive elements of the iso1 promoter. Plant Cell 15, 2076–2092. 10.1105/tpc.014597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki N., Rivero R. M., Shulaev V., Blumwald E., Mittler R. (2014). Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 203, 32–43. 10.1111/nph.12797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang N., Zhang H., Li X., Xiao J., Xiong L. (2012). Constitutive activation of transcription factor OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 158, 1755–1768. 10.1104/pp.111.190389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torres-Schumann S., Godoy J. A., Pintor-Toro J. A. (1992). A probable lipid transfer protein gene is induced by NaCl in stems of tomato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 749–757. 10.1007/BF00020016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ulker B., Somssich I. E. (2004). WRKY transcription factors: from DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 491–498. 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C., Deng P., Chen L., Wang X., Ma H., Hu W., et al. (2013). A wheat WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY10 confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco. PLoS ONE 8:e65120. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang F., Hou X., Tang J., Wang Z., Wang S., Jiang F., et al. (2012). A novel cold-inducible gene from Pak-choi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis), BcWRKY46, enhances the cold, salt and dehydration stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 4553–4564. 10.1007/s11033-011-1245-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Sun P. P., Chen C. L., Wang Y., Fu X. Z., Liu J. H. (2011). An arginine decarboxylase gene PtADC from Poncirus trifoliata confers abiotic stress tolerance and promotes primary root growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 2899–2914. 10.1093/jxb/erq463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Z., Zhang Z. L., Zou X., Huang J., Ruas P., Thompson D., et al. (2005). Annotations and functional analyses of the rice WRKY gene superfamily reveal positive and negative regulators of abscisic acid signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 137, 176–189. 10.1104/pp.104.054312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong L., Zhu J. K. (2002). Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 131–139. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00782.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y., Hu W., Liu J., Zhang J., Jia C., Miao H., et al. (2014). A banana aquaporin gene, MaPIP1;1, is involved in tolerance to drought and salt stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 14:59. 10.1186/1471-2229-14-59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan H., Jia H., Chen X., Hao L., An H., Guo X. (2014). The cotton WRKY transcription factor GhWRKY17 functions in drought and salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana through ABA signaling and the modulation of reactive oxygen species production. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 2060–2076. 10.1093/pcp/pcu133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yonamine I., Yoshida K., Kido K., Nakagawa A., Nakayama H., Shinmyo A. (2004). Overexpression of NtHAL3 genes confers increased levels of proline biosynthesis and the enhancement of salt tolerance in cultured tobacco cells. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 387–395. 10.1093/jxb/erh043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu D., Chen C., Chen Z. (2001). Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression. Plant Cell 13, 1527–1540. 10.1105/tpc.13.7.1527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng L., Liu G., Meng X., Liu Y., Ji X., Li Y., et al. (2013). A WRKY gene from Tamarix hispida, ThWRKY4, mediates abiotic stress responses by modulating reactive oxygen species and expression of stress-responsive genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 82, 303–320. 10.1007/s11103-013-0063-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Q. Y., Tian A. G., Zou H. F., Xie Z. M., Lei G., Huang J., et al. (2008). Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 486–503. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00336.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X., Jiang Y., Yu D. (2011). WRKY22 transcription factor mediates dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cells 31, 303–313. 10.1007/s10059-011-0047-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J. K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 247–273. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.