Abstract
Subtentorial ependymoma is a common central nervous system tumor in young children, but is uncommon in adults. Ependymoma often arises from the cells lining the fourth ventricle. The present study reports a rare case of primary ependymoma that originated from the cerebellopontine angle, with local extension to the two internal auditory canals and remote spinal metastasis, in an adult male. A 50-year-old male presented with headache, tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss that had persisted for 4 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass in each of the cerebellopontine angles, which had spread to each internal auditory canal and wrapped the VII/VIII cranial nerve complex. A gross total resection was performed to remove the mass in the right side. Histological examination confirmed that the tumor was a World Health Organization grade II papillary ependymoma. Notably, the patient complained of urine retention post-surgery and massive occupational lesions in T3-T4 and L5-S2 were found on full spinal cord MRI. The patient then received combination therapy consisting of temozolomide, and whole-brain and spinal cord radiation. In the final follow-up examination, performed 13 months after treatment, slight shrinkage of the T3 lesion was observed, and no progression of the left cerebellopontine angle and S5-L2 lesions were identified on MRI. In summary, although this clinical entity is rare, the diagnosis of ependymoma and the possibility of spinal cord metastasis should be considered in subtentorial tumors.
Keywords: cerebellopontine angle, spinal metastasis, ependymoma
Introduction
Subtentorial ependymoma mainly occurs in young children and usually arises in the fourth ventricle (1). Although it is a relatively benign tumor, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spread is found in 8–33% of patients (2,3). Moreover, subtentorial ependymoma is more inclined to exhibit CSF metastasis compared with supratentorial ependymoma (4).
Bilateral primary posterior fossa ependymoma originating from the cerebellopontine angle, termed primary cerebellopontine angle ependymoma, is a rare form of subtentorial ependymoma that predominantly occurs in infants and young children. The main symptom is headache due to progressively increasing intracranial pressure (5), while cranial nerve deficit is relatively uncommon. Surgical resection with subsequent radiotherapy is the primary treatment strategy for patients with ependymoma (6). The efficacy of conventional chemotherapy for this disease remains uncertain; however, temozolomide appears to be a promising adjuvant therapeutic approach for multifocal anaplastic ependymoma following surgical resection (7). The extent of surgical resection is the major determinant of overall survival in pediatric patients (8). However, the prognosis varies in different reports, with 5-year overall survival ranging between 50 and 64%, and progression-free survival ranging between 23 and 64% (5,9–11).
The present study reports a rare case of primary cerebellopontine angle ependymoma extending to the internal auditory canals and spinal cord in an adult man. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case described in the literature, with previously reported cases of primary cerebellopontine angle ependymoma limited to one side with no spinal cord metastasis (12–14). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Case report
On May 3, 2013, a 50 year-old man presented to the Department of Neurosurgery of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (Shenzhen, China) due to headache, tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss that had persisted for 4 months. A physical examination showed no facial hypo- or hyperesthesia. Muscle strength and limb tone was normal. The patient was positive for Romberg's sign and physical reflections. Babinski's sign was negative. No significant past medical history or family history were found.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass in each of the cerebellopontine angles with well-defined margins and a cyst in the middle of the right mass, which presented with abnormal isointense to hypointense signals (compared with gray matter) on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous hyperintense signals on T2-weighted images. The two internal auditory canals were enlarged due to mass extension. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated a lack of blood supply to the two masses (Fig. 1). The main differential diagnoses included acoustic neuroma, meningioma, glioma or lower cranial nerve schwannoma, with acoustic neuroma as the most probable preliminary diagnosis according to the clinical symptoms, MRI appearance and enlarged internal auditory canals.
Figure 1.
(A) T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) image showing bilateral masses in the cerebellopontine angles, with clear margins and a cyst in the middle of the right mass. (B) T2-weighted MR image showing the mass to be heterogeneous and hyperintense relative to gray matter, with an effect on the brainstem and fourth ventricle. (C) Contrast-enhanced image showing a lack of blood supply to the masses. (D) The tumors of each side protruding into the internal auditory canals.
A craniotomy was performed via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, and a gross total resection was performed to remove the tumor on the right side. During the surgery, it was found that the tumor originated from the right cerebellopontine angle and extended to the internal auditory canal. The tumor was soft, fleshy and reddish-gray, with a big cyst inside. The blood supply was poor and no apparent calcification was apparent. Notably, the tumor was wrapped around the VII/VIII cranial nerve complex and all other lower cranial nerves. Histological examination verified a papillary ependymoma, classified as a World Health Organization grade II tumor (15). The tumor featured perivascular pseudorosettes and small foci of bleeding, necrosis, degeneration and pigment deposition (Fig. 2). Moreover, the tumor was positively stained with neuron-specific enolase, synaptophysin, cluster of differentiation (CD)99, glial fibrillary acidic protein, S-100, chromogranin A, CD56 and Ki-67, with a few cells with hyperchromatic nuclei.
Figure 2.
Histological section showing a cellular glial neoplasm with abundant perivascular pseudorossettes characteristic of ependymoma (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, x100).
The surgery was successful and the follow up MRI confirmed that the tumor on the right side had been completely resected (Fig. 3A). Following the surgery, the patient began to gradually recover in the period prior to adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation treatment. However, during this period, the patient started to complain of urine retention, which had not been present prior to the surgery. This was initially considered to be due to irritation by the urinary catheter and prostate hypertrophy. As spinal metastasis is one of the features of papillary ependymoma, full spinal cord MRI was performed and massive occupational lesions were found at T3-T4 and L5-S2 (Fig. 3B and C). It was speculated that these spinal tumors were of ependymomal origin, but a histological examination was not performed since the patient refused to undergo a biopsy procedure. Combination therapy using single dose temozolomide chemotherapy (4 cycles of 150 mg/m2 administered for 5 days in a 28-day therapeutic) and radiation therapy (3,600 cGy whole-brain and spinal cord radiation treatment administered in 20 fractions over 28 days, and 1,620 cGy focal irradiation administered in 9 fractions over 13 days at the surgical incision site) was selected to control tumor growth. A slight shrinkage of the T3 lesion was observed, and no progression of the left cerebellopontine angle and S5-L2 lesions were identified on follow-up MRI performed 13 months later (Fig. 4).
Figure 3.

(A) Post-operative magnetic resonance (MR) image showing no residual tumor in the right cerebellopontine angle (T2-weighted). Full spinal cord MR images showing (B) T3-T4 and (C) S5-L2 tumor metastasis.
Figure 4.

Follow-up magnetic resonance images showing no increase in the size of the tumor in (A) the left cerebellopontine angle, and at (B) T3-T4 and (C) S5-L2.
Discussion
Ependymomas are relatively rare, with an incidence of ~0.2 per 100,000 person-years. Men and Caucasians are more susceptible to ependymomas compared with women and other ethnicities (16). Particularly, subtentorial ependymomas typically arise in the fourth ventricle from the roof, floor, lateral medullary velum or its lateral recesses, and the majority of the tumors appear in young children (1). Through the foramina of Luschka and lateral Magendie, ependymomas may extend into the cerebellopontine angle or subarachnoid space (17). Typical MRI features of ependymomas are hypointense to isointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with irregular enhancement and marked heterogeneity due to hemorrhage, calcification, necrosis or cystic components (18).
To date, radical resection is the widely accepted therapy for ependymoma (19). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been used post-operatively to prevent tumor recurrence. Chemotherapy has also been used to decrease the tumor size prior to surgery and reduce the radiotherapy dosage post-surgery. However, the potential for adjuvant radiotherapy to improve the prognosis of a patient with ependymoma remains under debate (19–21).
The prognosis of patients with ependymomas depends on various factors, including tumor grade, therapeutic regimes, extent of resection, Ki-67 index, gene type, location, age and gender. Among them, radical removal of the tumor is the most significant prognostic factor (22). The prognosis of adults is significantly better than that of children, with a 5-year-survival-rate of 55–90% compared with 14–60% (23).
For ependymoma, metastasis is relatively common for the anaplastic type, subtentorial tumors and young patients (24,25). In addition, surgery can potentially cause tumor dissemination (26). Therefore, it is important to avoid tumor dissemination and spillage during surgery in cases of suspected ependymoma in order to avoid CSF metastasis and recurrences. Moreover, full spinal cord MRI is necessary for ependymomas, particularly subtentorial ependymomas, as the tumor cells may migrate to other places through the CSF.
In the present case, bilateral primary posterior fossa ependymomas that originated from the cerebellopontine angles with local invasion to the fourth ventricle and the internal auditory canals, and with remote metastasis to the spinal cord were reported in a 50-year-old male. This was an extremely rare case of adult ependymoma with the following features: i) Cerebellopontine angle origin; ii) wrapping of the VII/VIII cranial nerve complex; and iii) extension into the internal auditory canals, with remote metastasis to the spinal cord. These features could easily lead doctors to form a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type II acoustic neuroma. The present case clearly suggests that ependymoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis among the cerebellopontine angle tumors. Another notable fact is that the patient complained of a new symptom of urine retention shortly after surgery, which was found to be caused by massive occupational lesions in T3-T4 and L5-S2. Although a biopsy examination could not be performed, it was highly speculated that these lesions were metastases from the ependymoma in the brain. Apparently, these metastasized lesions were unlikely due to surgical dissemination in this case, as it is impossible to develop such large metastasized lesions within a short period of two weeks (the time prior to performing follow-up MRI).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of bilateral primary posterior fossa ependymomas originating from the cerebellopontine angle and extending to the internal auditory canals, with spinal cord metastasis. Although primary cerebellopontine angle ependymoma is extremely rare and difficult to diagnosis, pre-operative suspicion of ependymoma is important for surgical planning, given its more malignant nature and poorer prognosis compared with acoustic neuroma. The present study also suggests that full spinal cord MRI is extremely important to rule out spinal cord metastasis in ependymoma patients.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurosurgery Award from the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission.
References
- 1.Cosgrove GR, Villemure JG, Robitaille Y, Melanson D. Extraaxial ependymoma of the posterior fossa. Surg Neurol. 1985;24:433–436. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90304-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Qian X, Goumnerova LC, De Girolami U, Cibas ES. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with ependymoma: A bi-institutional retrospective study. Cancer. 2008;114:307–314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salazar OM. A better understanding of CNS seeding and a brighter outlook for postoperatively irradiated patients with ependymomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983;9:1231–1234. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90186-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yuh EL, Barkovich AJ, Gupta N. Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25:1203–1213. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0878-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sanford RA, Merchant TE, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Kun LE, Boop FA. Advances in surgical techniques for resection of childhood cerebellopontine angle ependymomas are key to survival. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25:1229–1240. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0886-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Merchant TE, Fouladi M. Ependymoma: New therapeutic approaches including radiation and chemotherapy. J Neurooncol. 2005;75:287–299. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-6753-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Freyschlag CF, Tuettenberg J, Lohr F, Thomé C, Schmieder K, Seiz M. Response to temozolomide in supratentorial multifocal recurrence of malignant ependymoma. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:1023–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bouffet E, Perilongo G, Canete A, Massimino M. Intracranial ependymomas in children: A critical review of prognostic factors and a plea for cooperation. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1998;30:319–329. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199806)30:6<319::AID-MPO1>3.3.CO;2-3. discussion 329–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pollack IF, Gerszten PC, Martinez AJ, Lo KH, Shultz B, Albright AL, Janosky J, Deutsch M. Intracranial ependymomas of childhood: Long-term outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:655–666. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199510000-00008. discussion 666–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robertson PL, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Rorke LB, Allen JC, Geyer JR, Stanley P, Li H, Albright AL, McGuire-Cullen P, et al. Survival and prognostic factors following radiation therapy and chemotherapy for ependymomas in children: A report of the Children's Cancer Group. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:695–703. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bustamante-Montes P, Villa-Romero AR, Lezana-Fernández MA, Fernández de Hoyos R, Borja-Aburto VH, Lona-Zamora A, Rascón-Pacheco RA. Malnutrition as a multiple cause of death. Salud Publica Mex. 1991;33:475–481. (In Spanish) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Needle MN, Goldwein JW, Grass J, Cnaan A, Bergman I, Molloy P, Sutton L, Zhao H, Garvin JH, Jr, Phillips PC. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of intracranial ependymoma of childhood. Cancer. 1997;80:341–347. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970715)80:2<341::AID-CNCR23>3.3.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kasliwal MK, Chandra PS, Sharma BS. Images in neuro oncology: Primary extraaxial cerebellopontine angle ependymoma. J Neurooncol. 2007;83:31–32. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9330-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lyons MK, Kelly PJ. Posterior fossa ependymomas: Report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:659–664. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199105000-00004. discussion 664–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bates JE, Peterson CR, III, Yeaney GA, Walter KA, Lundquist T, Rosenzweig D, Milano MT. Spinal drop metastasis in myxopapillary ependymoma: A case report and a review of treatment options. Rare Tumors. 2014;6:5404. doi: 10.4081/rt.2014.5404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fukui MB, Hogg JP, Martinez AJ. Extraaxial ependymoma of the posterior fossa. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1179–1181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spoto GP, Press GA, Hesselink JR, Solomon M. Intracranial ependymoma and subependymoma: MR manifestations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11:83–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vitanovics D, Bálint K, Hanzély Z, Banczerowski P, Afra D. Ependymoma in adults: Surgery, reoperation and radiotherapy for survival. Pathol Oncol Res. 2010;16:93–99. doi: 10.1007/s12253-009-9194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oh MC, Ivan ME, Sun MZ, Kaur G, Safaee M, Kim JM, Sayegh ET, Aranda D, Parsa AT. Adjuvant radiotherapy delays recurrence following subtotal resection of spinal cord ependymomas. Neuro-oncol. 2013;15:208–215. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Metellus P, Guyotat J, Chinot O, Durand A, Barrie M, Giorgi R, Jouvet A, Figarella-Branger D. Adult intracranial WHO grade II ependymomas: Long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis in a series of 114 patients. Neuro-oncol. 2010;12:976–984. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shim KW, Kim DS, Choi JU. The history of ependymoma management. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25:1167–1183. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0900-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ambekar S, Ranjan M, Prasad C, Santosh V, Somanna S. Fourth ventricular ependymoma with a distant intraventricular metastasis: Report of a rare case. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2013;4:S121–S124. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.116444. (Sul 1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chao MM, Packer RJ, Myseros JS, Rood BR. Isolated extracranial recurrence of anaplastic ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:317–318. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu X, Sun B, Xu Q, Che X, Hu J, Gu S, Shou J. Outcomes in treatment for primary spinal anaplastic ependymomas: A retrospective series of 20 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:3–11. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.SPINE12183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yamada M, Sato T, Kuromi Y, Matsumoto Y, Oda K, Kishida Y, Tamura T, Ichikawa M, Sakuma J, Saito K. Surgical seeding of an anaplastic ependymoma. No Shinkei Geka. 2013;41:1093–1097. (In Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


