Abstract
Pediatric asthma is often undiagnosed, and therefore untreated. It negatively impacts children’s functioning, including school attendance and performance, as well as quality of life. School-wide screening for asthma is becoming increasingly common, making identification of possible asthma particularly relevant for school nurses. Nurses may need to help parents cope with the new diagnosis, and teach them skills to manage the illness. The aim of this paper is to present a three-phase model of how parents cope with a newly diagnosed pediatric chronic illness. Using asthma as an example, we describe these phases (Emotional Crisis, Facing Reality, and Reclaiming Life), illustrate how parents progress through the phases, and discuss situations associated with possible regression. Next, we offer strategies framed around a theory of asthma self-management to assist school nurses and other medical providers to motivate parents to develop successful disease management skills.
Asthma is the most prevalent pediatric chronic illness affecting over 6.7 million children in the United States (Akinbami, Moorman, Garbe, & Sondik, 2009). Asthma negatively impacts students’ quality of life and students with asthma have more school absences and lower academic performance compared to peers without asthma (Diette et al., 2000; Moonie, Sterling, Figgs, & Castro, 2006; Taras & Potts-Datema, 2005). Asthma severity, particularly nighttime awakenings, is also associated with parent absenteeism from work (Diette et al., 2000). Recent prevalence studies among 7- to 18-year-olds have found that 28% to 50% of those who report asthma-like symptoms have never been diagnosed with asthma (Carter, Debley, & Redding, 2005; Clark et al., 2002; Hetlevik, Ploen, Nystad, & Magnus, 2000; Lewis et al., 2004; Lowe & Burr, 2001; Siersted, Boldsen, Hansen, Mostgaard, & Hyldebrandt, 1998; Yeatts, Shy, Sotir, Music, & Herget, 2003). The rates of undiagnosed asthma are concerning because untreated asthma is associated with significant activity limitation (Carter et al., 2005; Joseph et al., 2005; Lewis et al., 2004; Yeatts, Davis, Sotir, Herget, & Shy, 2003; Yeatts, Shy et al., 2003). Moreover, among those with moderate or severe persistent symptoms, diagnosed and undiagnosed youth do not differ in symptom frequency, activity limitations, or days missed from school (Carter et al., 2005; Joseph et al., 2005).
Schools can play a critical role in helping to accurately identify symptoms of asthma which could lead to a diagnosis and treatment (Bruzzese, Evans, & Kattan, 2009). Because of the significant amount of time children and adolescents spend in school, students often receive health care from school nurses or staff of school-based health centers (Gustafson, 2005; Murray, 2005). Conducting health screenings is an essential role of school nurses, with many schools administering annual vision, hearing, or other healthcare assessments (National Association of School Nurses, 2002). Recently, resources have been devoted to school-wide asthma screening, especially in low-income, urban neighborhoods, where there is a high prevalence of undiagnosed asthma (Bruzzese et al., 2009; Gerald et al., 2006). Screening measures to identify students with asthma have been developed and validated for students across diverse racial and economic backgrounds (Bonner et al., 2006; Galant et al., 2004; Gerald et al., 2006; Redline et al., 2004; Yawn, Wollan, Scanlon, & Kurland, 2003). Once school nurses or other school personnel identify a child with a health concern such as asthma, they may often need to connect the child and their caregivers to medical care for a formal diagnosis and appropriate treatment, work with the family and the primary care provider to develop a written treatment plan, or assist the family in learning to cope with the illness.
Identification of pediatric asthma or other chronic illnesses may have implications for parents beyond the diagnosis and immediate health concerns associated with the illness. This diagnosis may disrupt the way a parent thinks about the child and the family. This may be particularly true if the diagnosis follows a school screening, rather than from a clinical evaluation initiated by the parent. Parents have often developed a picture of an ideal child, consisting of impressions and hopes (J. B. Ellis, 1989), and this usually involves a healthy, typically developing child. When a child is diagnosed with a chronic illness, this ideal image may shatter (J. B. Ellis, 1989); the diagnosis represents a turning point for the family (Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004), where parents may no longer view their family as healthy.
Parental coping behavior will be determined in large part by how parents react to the diagnosis, which in turn has the potential to impact asthma management. Consequently, school nurses play an important role in assisting children and their parents in coping with the disease, which can be accompanied by a number of challenges.
The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual phase model for parental coping with a child’s chronic illness using asthma as an example. To develop this model we drew on our prior school-based research involving children with asthma and their parents, and conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on psychological aspects of pediatric chronic illness. Three phases are described that parents may progress through when coping with a pediatric chronic illness. Next, different strategies are presented that are based on a theory of asthma management that school nurses and other health professionals can use to motivate parents to develop successful coping strategies and to better manage their child’s disease.
A Three Phase Model of Coping
There are three phases of coping that a parent will experience following the initial diagnosis of a child with asthma: A) Emotional Crisis; B) Facing Reality; and C) Reclaiming Life. Table 1 provides an overview of each phase.
Table 1.
Model of Parental Coping with a Child’s Initial Asthma Diagnosis
| Phase of Parental Coping | Key Features of the Phase |
|---|---|
| A. Emotional Crisis |
|
| B. Facing Reality |
|
| C. Reclaiming Life |
|
Phase A: Emotional Crisis
The initial diagnosis of a child with asthma may generate an emotional crisis for parents. Dominant emotions at this time include denial, grief, self-doubt, powerlessness, anxiety, and guilt. Each of these key emotions is reviewed and their impact on parental coping is described.
Denial
One emotion parents may experience is denial. Refusing to accept the diagnosis may be adaptive because it affords parents the opportunity to regroup and gather mental strength to deal with disease management (National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 1996). Prolonged denial, however, can negatively impact treatment as it is associated with noncompliance (Buston & Wood, 2000).
Grief
Parents in the emotional crisis phase may also experience grief. Parents grieve the loss of the ideal, healthy child (J. B. Ellis, 1989). Parents may feel sadness and disappointment for the loss of their perceived normal future, independence, previously established family routines, and changing roles within the family (Maltby, Kristjanson, & Coleman, 2003). Grieving parents may also become aware of their own mortality and the fragility of life (J. B. Ellis, 1989). It is recommended that school nurses be mindful that this grief may be very new and raw if the notion of a child having asthma is first identified by a school screening.
Some have equated the emotional response a parent experiences after a child is diagnosed with a chronic illness to the grief experienced with death (Bowes, Lowes, Warner, & Gregory, 2009; Lowes & Lyne, 2000), citing Kubler Ross’s (1969) stage model of grief. This model assumes individuals progress linearly through discrete stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance, with grief being time bound and resolved in the final stage of acceptance. Unlike death, however, chronic illnesses by definition do not have an endpoint. Therefore, grief is not finite for many parents coping with a child with asthma, and may occur over the life-span. If health professionals view grief as a linear progression, parents who re-experience grief may be viewed as pathological (Kurtzer-White & Luterman, 2003).
To better understand the grief process that parents undergo, it is useful to frame grief in terms of chronic grief or chronic sorrow (Olshansky, 1962). Chronic grief is a coping mechanism that allows for periodic grieving; it is not an acceptance of the illness. It is an important concept when discussing asthma because events and situations can occur that suddenly bring the reality of a chronically ill child to the forefront (Bowes et al., 2009; George, Vickers, Wilkes, & Barton, 2006; Lowes & Lyne, 2000). For example, a parent may feel grief after a child experiences an asthma episode for the first time in years. Therefore, it is not abnormal to re-grieve the symbolic loss of the ideal child over the course of the child’s life. As with denial, grief has the potential to be adaptive if it allows one to mourn the lost dream of an ideal child, brings about different feelings, and helps parents move along in the coping process (Kurtzer-White & Luterman, 2003; Moses, 1983).
Self-doubt and powerlessness
Grief often leads parents to experience self-doubt and powerlessness. Parents may feel inadequate at managing asthma, and cannot imagine effectively caring for their sick child. They may doubt their ability to control environmental triggers or to juggle multiple medications, both of which can change with the seasonal nature of asthma. As a result, they may feel powerless against potential flare-ups. Additionally, parents may have less confidence in their parenting skills in general. This lack of self-confidence may negatively impact the parent-child relationship (Kurtzer-White & Luterman, 2003), which in turn has the potential to hinder asthma management (Bruzzese, Unikel, Gallagher, Evans, & Colland, 2008; Kaugars, Klinnert, & Bender, 2004).
Anxiety
Parents may also experience anxiety about how to care for their child, the child’s possible death due to asthma, the uncertainty of the severity and timing of the next asthma episode, medication side-effects, and/or potential lack of communication by health care professionals (Juniper et al., 1996; Laster, Holsey, Shendell, McCarty, & Celano, 2009; Maltby et al., 2003; Townsend et al., 1991). Parents report uncertainty of symptoms and their ability to appropriately handle a severe attack as one of the greatest stressors of having a child with a chronic illness (Cohen, 1995; MacDonald, 1996; Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004). School nurses should be mindful that anxiety is strongest when asthma is first diagnosed, but can reoccur when the child has a flare-up. It is recommended that school nurses also be aware that anxiety may be manifested as anger and possibly denial.
Guilt
Another emotion parents may cope with in this phase is guilt. Parents may blame themselves for their child’s asthma. Parents often see their role as one of safeguarding the health of their child, and may feel as if they neglected their duty as parents when the child is diagnosed with asthma. Parents may not directly refer to guilt, but it may become apparent when discussing the cause of the illness (Maltby et al., 2003). For example, they may ask if they could have prevented the illness. When guilt is subtle, parents may be less open to talking about their feelings. If parents do not resolve their guilt, they may feel very stressed and react destructively (Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004), overprotecting and over-dedicating themselves to their children (Kurtzer-White & Luterman, 2003).
Phase B: Facing Reality
When parents process their feelings following the initial diagnosis, they are able to progress to the next phase, Facing Reality. They attempt to regain control of their lives and restore daily routines (Maltby et al., 2003). Parents try to re-establish a sense of normalcy for issues they have some power over, including time management, illness management, reorganization of the family, and their home environment (Fisher, 2001).
In this phase, parents begin to develop coping skills. One such skill is seeking information (Maltby et al., 2003; Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004). Asthma education can be used to teach asthma management strategies, which can empower parents and help them regain control (Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004). Parents may also use trial and error (Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004) to learn which strategies are most effective for their child. For example, to increase the likelihood that the child takes daily medication, they may try keeping the medication with the child’s toothbrush. Or they may try giving medication to their child before the child is exposed to triggers, and observe what happens.
Phase C: Reclaiming Life
As parents develop coping skills, they gain a sense of efficacy to care for the illness and move into the next phase, Reclaiming Life. In this phase, parents regain confidence regarding their ability to care for a child with asthma. They integrate the fact that they have a child with a chronic illness into their parenting role (Maltby et al., 2003). Parents also establish new routines which incorporate management strategies. Families who develop routines to manage the demands of the chronic illness are more likely to adhere to medication protocols (Fiese & Everhart, 2006). Additionally, family rituals, such as having an established dinner or bedtime routine, have been found to protect children with asthma from experiencing anxiety (Markson & Fiese, 2000). Through routines a sense of normalcy, stability, and organization are restored in the family.
Non-linear Nature of the Phases
We propose that progressing through the three phases of coping is not a linear process with parents moving from the Phase A to Phase B to Phase C, the ultimate endpoint. Instead, as with chronic grief, parents may re-experience the phases periodically. One reason for this is the dynamic and episodic nature of asthma (Clark, Gong, & Kaciroti, 2001). The seasonal variation of asthma lends itself to intra-individual differences in symptom presentation and treatment. For example, the parent of a child who has had well-controlled asthma during the spring and summer may be in Phase C. However, the child may experience a sudden flare-up in symptoms during the fall that results in a hospitalization. Consequently, parents may regress to Phase A, where they doubt their abilities to care for their child, and ask themselves what they could have done to prevent the situation.
Children’s developmental transitions may also cause parents to regress to a lower phase. Developmental changes introduce new challenges children need to master, with family roles often being altered. This is particularly true as children progress through adolescence where there are multiple developmental changes that both hinder and foster asthma self-management (Bruzzese et al., 2004). For example, youth’s decision-making autonomy sharply increases in different domains. In middle childhood, children have little input regarding decisions about health, but by late adolescence families engage in joint decision making (Wray-Lake, Flanagan, & Osgood, 2010). This requires caregivers to relinquish some control of asthma management to the adolescents, which may trigger fear and anxiety in caregivers.
Motivating Parents to Progress and Remain in Phase C
Despite the dynamic nature of these phases, there are strategies that school nurses and other health care providers can utilize to help parents reach and remain in Phase C. Parents must first cope with their own feelings before they can be motivated to focus on the health needs of their child. To do this, providers should encourage parents to express their ideas and feelings by asking them open-ended questions to tap at their feelings (Trollvik & Severinsson, 2004). Nurses should consider referring parents to a mental health professional for an evaluation if parents are not coping with negative feelings, and it is interfering with the management of their child’s asthma.
Another recommendation is to connect parents with supportive individuals. This could be a medical provider, a health advocate at the school, or other parents of a child with asthma; nurses could also encourage parents to talk to supportive friends. Medical providers should aim to develop a partnership with parents (Fisher, 2001; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, 2007; Peterson-Sweeney, McMullen, Yoos, & Kitzman, 2003). When parents are regarded as partners in the care of their child, they feel that they are recognized for the unique knowledge they hold about their child’s illness (Fisher, 2001). This partnership is closely related to parents regaining control in their lives.
We also recommend teaching parenting skills in the context of having a child with asthma or any other chronic illness (Bruzzese et al., 2008). They may doubt that they are good parents at the onset of diagnosis, and need encouragement to alter routines. Interventions that specifically address disease management in the context of family systems have found positive changes in parent-adolescent relationships, disease knowledge, adherence, and health outcomes in asthma (Bruzzese et al., 2008) and other chronic illnesses (D. A. Ellis, Naar-King, Cunningham, & Secord, 2006; Quittner et al., 2000; Wysocki, Greco, Harris, Bubb, & White, 2001).
Learning to manage asthma requires more than knowledge acquisition (McQuaid, Kopel, Klein, & Fritz, 2003); it requires changing the way parents think of the disease. School nurses may need to help parents change entrenched health beliefs as well as behavioral styles of coping (Zimmerman, Bonner, Evans, & Mellins, 1999). To do this effectively, we recommend school nurses apply Zimmerman and Bonner’s (1999) theory of asthma self-regulation.
Asthma Self-Regulation Theory
Asthma self-regulation is defined as a person’s knowledge, confidence, and skills in managing asthma on their own after they have been given a treatment regimen (Zimmerman et al., 1999). Zimmerman and Bonner’s (1999) model of asthma self-regulation is grounded in social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986, 1997). Social cognitive theory proposes that learning will take place if individuals possess self-efficacy, or confidence in their ability to execute a behavior. People self-regulate their health by setting reasonable goals, using strategies to achieve these goals, and monitoring their effectiveness in attaining their goals (Zimmerman, 1989, 2000). Self-regulation strategies are taught most effectively through expert modeling, guidance, and feedback from experts in real-life situations (Bandura, 1997).
The development of skills needed to effectively regulate asthma follows a sequential four-phase process: 1) Asthma Avoidance; 2) Asthma Acceptance; 3) Asthma Compliance; and 4) Asthma Self-Regulation (Bonner et al., 2002; Zimmerman et al., 1999). Table 2 depicts the health beliefs underlying the four phases of asthma self-regulation. Progression through the phases requires changes in the way one thinks about the disease including perceived vulnerability to the disease, as well as self-efficacy to cope with and manage symptoms (Zimmerman et al., 1999). Patients must see themselves as vulnerable, change their core beliefs about the chronic nature of asthma and value of medication, and change their identity from self-doubting to self-efficacious. Stage-specific asthma educational messages have been found to enhance the effectiveness of pediatric behavioral interventions (Bonner et al., 2002; Bruzzese et al., 2004; Bruzzese et al., In press). Using educational messages at the appropriate stages helps parents gather and use information, and motivates them to act on the health needs of their child.
Table 2.
Health Beliefs Underlying Phases of Asthma Self-Regulation
| Phase of Asthma Self-Regulation | Aware of Asthma Symptoms | Believes Child is Vulnerable to Asthma | Views Medication as Being Helpful to Control Symptoms | Has Self-Efficacy Regarding Asthma Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma Symptom Avoidance | Yes | No | No | No |
| Asthma Acceptance | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Asthma Compliance | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Asthma Self-Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Phase 1: Asthma Avoidance
Parents of a newly diagnosed child will most likely be in the first phase, Asthma Avoidance. Parents in this phase do not accept the chronic and serious nature of asthma. Instead, they view it as acute. They acknowledge that their child has periodic symptoms, but they do not attribute the symptoms to a vulnerability that has the potential to compromise health if left untreated. These parents may also avoid dealing with asthma symptoms until an attack occurs. In between asthma episodes, symptoms are not treated medically. Instead, parents restrict activity to minimize symptoms, such as having their child avoid physical activities, or they treat symptoms only when the child has acute exacerbations. In our work with high school students, we found some parents treat their adolescent’s asthma symptoms with home remedies, such as placing a warm washcloth on the face, inhaling steam from boiling water, or ingesting different herbal supplements to try to alleviate symptoms rather than using medication. Others deny that their child has symptoms, despite the adolescent reporting symptoms several times a week.
Educational messages
Parents in Phase 1 need to understand that asthma is chronic, that symptoms can occur between acute attacks, and that the underlying causes of the asthma symptoms need to be treated. In addition, they need to be made aware that simply restricting the child’s activity is a sign of uncontrolled asthma, and that monitoring asthma is the key to control.
Phase 2: Asthma Acceptance
Rather than ignoring symptoms between acute exacerbations and avoiding medications, parents in Phase 2, Asthma Acceptance, begin to recognize that asthma is chronic, and that some regular treatment is necessary. They accept that asthma is a serious and potentially life-threatening disease, but they view reoccurring exacerbations as the norm and continue to treat symptoms reactively, not preventively. They distrust the long-term control medication’s effectiveness, and because of this, parents mostly use, and often over-rely on, quick-reliever medications to rescue their child from an asthma attack. From our experience with middle school students with uncontrolled asthma, we found that some parents do not want to overmedicate their child, or they think that their child will develop a tolerance to the controller medication so they discontinue using the medication as soon as the child begins to feel better.
Educational messages
In Phase 2, the goal is for parents to understand how medications function and to track symptoms with diaries, checklists, and/or graphs. Parents in this phase need to receive educational messages that include, a) attacks are a sign that asthma symptoms are out of control, b) quick-reliever medications do not prevent symptoms, c) symptoms are a sign of inflammation, d) controller medications reduce inflammation, and e) it is important to monitor symptoms to judge whether the treatment regimen is working.
Phase 3: Asthma Compliance
When parents accept that asthma can be controlled by using daily medications they progress to Phase 3, Asthma Compliance. Parents try to prevent symptom flare-ups by following their medical provider’s recommendations. However, they are unskilled in altering medications preventively and, therefore, lack the confidence to self-regulate. As a result, parents attribute fluctuations in their child’s asthma to personal failures, and may have difficulty coping. These parents also maintain close contact with their medical provider, and although they attend preventive appointments with their child, there is an over-reliance on the medical provider.
Educational messages
Parents that have progressed to Phase 3 need educational messages that help them learn how to develop a written asthma action plan with a doctor. They also need to learn to judge how well controller medications are working by monitoring symptoms and medication use.
Phase 4: Asthma Self-Regulation
Parents who develop self-efficacy to adjust treatment plans in order to regulate asthma progress to Phase 4, Asthma Self-Regulation. They manage asthma proactively by using controller medications and controlling environmental triggers. These parents begin to actively remove triggers from their home. They also adhere to stepped medical plans that allow for medication adjustments in response to changing conditions without heavy reliance on the medical provider. These parents have systematic ways of monitoring symptoms, effectiveness of medication, and the child’s regulatory efforts. For example, they may have their child use a peak flow meter or begin to record symptoms in a daily diary when they observe early warning signs of asthma. These parents also consult their medical provider to refine the treatment plan. They continue to have a positive collaboration with their provider like Phase 3 parents, but it is now a partnership, rather than a dependent relationship.
Educational messages
Phase 4 parents should be taught that by closely monitoring asthma, the family and their medical provider can tailor the best regimen for the child. Specifically, they need to be provided with information on signs indicating the need to adjust the treatment regimen and how to do so. They also need to learn how to identify and remove allergens in the home, especially in the child’s bedroom. Although it may not be possible to avoid all asthma attacks, parents can help attenuate negative outcomes by learning their children’s early warning signs of flare-ups. They should understand that symptoms are not a sign of failure, but rather a cue to action.
Benchmarks of Progression through the Phases of Asthma Self-Regulation
School nurses can look for benchmarks that indicate parents are progressing through the phases. Benchmarks of progress from Phase 1 to Phase 2 include expressing dissatisfaction with symptoms, using prescribed medications rather than over-the-counter medications or home remedies when exacerbations occur, and realizing that activity restrictions and other non-medical practices do not control symptoms. Parents in Phase 1 avoid medications, while parents in Phase 2 rely too heavily on quick-relievers.
As parents transition from Phase 2 to Phase 3 they recognize that relying on quick-relievers means failing to prevent asthma symptoms, and interpret the need for quick-relievers as a problem in their regulation of asthma, not in medication. They also begin to use controller medications on a regular basis and report a reduction in symptoms.
Benchmarks of development from Phase 3 to Phase 4 include following written treatment plans, adjusting medication use according to the plan, using specific indicators (e.g., peak flow meter, symptoms from a diary) when discussing their child’s asthma, and consulting medical providers to refine treatment plans. Parents also actively remove triggers from the home, and set higher goals for quality of life.
Implications for School Nurses
The diagnosis of asthma, or other chronic illnesses, may trigger emotions in parents that hinder their ability to act on the health needs of their child. Parents must cope with grief and other strong emotions in order to move into action. School nurses can facilitate this by encouraging parents to discuss their feelings. Once parents cope with the initial feelings associated with a diagnosis, they can begin to take control of their child’s illness. School nurses can play an important role in promoting parents’ self-efficacy to manage their child’s newly diagnosed chronic illness by offering support and teaching them skills to manage their child’s disease. It is important to tailor the health educational messages to the stage of a parent’s self-regulation in order to maximize the likelihood that parents will act on the information. School nurses can look for particular benchmarks to signify parental development of asthma self-regulation. While we discussed parental coping in the context of asthma, school nurses can also apply these concepts when working with parents who have children diagnosed with other chronic illnesses.
Contributor Information
Cesalie Stepney, NYU School of Medicine.
Katelyn Kane, NYU School of Medicine.
Jean-Marie Bruzzese, NYU School of Medicine.
References
- Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Garbe PL, Sondik EJ. Status of childhood asthma in the United States, 1980–2007. Pediatrics. 2009;123(Suppl 3):S131–S145. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2233C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanisms in physical activation and health-promoting behavior. In: Madden J, Barchas J, editors. Adaptation, Learning, and Affect. New York: Rave Press; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Bonner S, Matte T, Rubin M, Sheares BJ, Fagan JK, Evans D, et al. Validating an asthma case detection instrument in a Head Start sample. Journal of School Health. 2006;76(9):471–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonner S, Zimmerman BJ, Evans D, Irigoyen M, Resnick D, Mellins RB. An individualized intervention to improve asthma management among urban Latino and African-American families. Journal of Asthma. 2002;39(2):167–179. doi: 10.1081/jas-120002198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowes S, Lowes L, Warner J, Gregory JW. Chronic sorrow in parents of children with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2009;65(5):992–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruzzese J-M, Bonner S, Vincent EJ, Sheares BJ, Mellins RB, Levison MJ, et al. Asthma education: The adolescent experience. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004;55(3):396–406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruzzese J-M, Evans D, Kattan M. School-based asthma programs. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2009;124(2):195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruzzese J-M, Kingston S, Sheares BJ, Cespedes A, Sadeghi H, Evans D. Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based intervention to help inner-city, ethnic minority adolescents with undiagnosed asthma. Patient Education & Counseling. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.019. (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruzzese J-M, Unikel LH, Gallagher R, Evans D, Colland VT. Feasibility and impact of a school-based intervention for families of urban adolescents with asthma: Results from a randomized pilot trial. Family Process. 2008;47(1):95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buston KM, Wood SF. Non-compliance amongst adolescents with asthma: Listening to what they tell us about self-management. Family Practice. 2000;17(2):134–138. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter ER, Debley JS, Redding GJ. Changes in asthma prevalence and impact on health and function in Seattle middle-school children: 1995 vs 2003. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2005;94(6):634–639. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61320-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark NM, Brown R, Joseph CL, Anderson EW, Liu M, Valerio M, et al. Issues in identifying asthma and estimating prevalence in an urban school population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002;55(9):870–881. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark NM, Gong M, Kaciroti N. A model of self-regulation for control of chronic disease. Health Education & Behavior. 2001;28(6):769–782. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen MH. The triggers of heightened parental uncertainty in chronic, life-threatening childhood illness. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5(1):63–77. [Google Scholar]
- Diette GB, Markson L, Skinner EA, Nguyen TT, Algatt-Bergstrom P, Wu AW. Nocturnal asthma in children affects school attendance, school performance, and parents’ work attendance. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2000;154(9):923–928. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.9.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis DA, Naar-King S, Cunningham PB, Secord E. Use of multisystemic therapy to improve antiretroviral adherence and health outcomes in HIV-infected pediatric patients: Evaluation of a pilot program. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2006;20(2):112–121. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis JB. Grieving for the loss of the perfect child: Parents of children with handicaps. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal. 1989;6(4):259–270. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher HR. The needs of parents with chronically sick children: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001;36(4):600–607. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galant SP, Crawford LJ, Morphew T, Jones CA, Bassin S, Galant SP, et al. Predictive value of a cross-cultural asthma case-detection tool in an elementary school population. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):e307–316. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0575-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George A, Vickers MH, Wilkes L, Barton B. Chronic grief: Experiences of working parents of children with chronic illness. Contemporary Nurse. 2006;23(2):228–242. doi: 10.5555/conu.2006.23.2.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerald LB, Redden D, Wittich AR, Hains C, Turner-Henson A, Hemstreet MP, et al. Outcomes for a comprehensive school-based asthma management program. Journal of School Health. 2006;76(6):291–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00114.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gustafson EM. History and overview of school-based health centers in the U.S. The Nursing Clinics of North America. 2005;40(4):595–606. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hetlevik O, Ploen O, Nystad W, Magnus P. The wheezing schoolchild–An undiagnosed asthmatic: A follow-up of children with parentally reported episodes of wheeze without diagnosed asthma. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2000;18(2):122–126. doi: 10.1080/028134300750019034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joseph CLM, Havstad S, Anderson EW, Brown R, Johnson CC, Clark NM. Effect of asthma intervention on children with undiagnosed asthma. Journal of Pediatrics. 2005;146:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Ferrie PJ, Griffith LE, Townsend M. Measuring quality of life in the parents of children with asthma. Quality of Life Research. 1996;5:27–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00435966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaugars AS, Klinnert MD, Bender BG. Family influences on pediatric asthma. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2004;29(7):475–491. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubler-Ross E. On Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co; 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Kurtzer-White E, Luterman D. Families and children with hearing loss: Grief and coping. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2003;9(4):232–235. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laster N, Holsey CN, Shendell DG, McCarty FA, Celano M. Barriers to asthma management among urban families: Caregiver and child perspectives. Journal of Asthma. 2009;46(7):731–739. doi: 10.1080/02770900903082571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis TC, Robins TG, Joseph CLM, Parker EA, Israel BA, Rowe Z, et al. Identification of gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood asthma using a community-based participatory research approach. Journal of Urban Health. 2004;81(3):472–488. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe GL, Burr M. Undiagnosed and untreated wheezing in a cohort of adolescents with a family history of allergic disease. British Journal of General Practice. 2001;51(469):664–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowes L, Lyne P. Chronic sorrow in parents of children with newly diagnosed diabetes: A review of the literature and discussion of the implications for nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;32(1):41–48. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald H. Mastering uncertainty: Mothering the child with asthma. Pediatric Nursing. 1996;22(1):93–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maltby HJ, Kristjanson L, Coleman M. The parenting competency framework: Learning to be a parent of a child with asthma. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2003;9(6):368–373. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markson S, Fiese BH. Family rituals as a protective factor for children with asthma. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2000;25(7):471–480. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/25.7.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McQuaid EL, Kopel SJ, Klein RB, Fritz GK. Medication adherence in pediatric asthma: Reasoning, responsibility, and behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2003;28(5):323–333. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moonie SA, Sterling DA, Figgs L, Castro M. Asthma status and severity affects missed school days. Journal of School Health. 2006;76(1):18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moses KL. The impact of initial diagnosis: Moblizing family resources. In: Mulick JA, Pueschel SM, editors. Parent Professional Partnerships in Developmental Disabilities Services. Cambridge, UK: Academic Guild Publishing; 1983. pp. 11–34. [Google Scholar]
- Murray SM. Cultural aspects of working with students enrolled in a school-based health center. The Nursing Clinics of North America. 2005;40(4):637–647. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Association of School Nurses. Issue brief. School health nursing services role in health care. 2002 Retrieved September 15, 2010, from www.nasn.org.
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Expert panel report 3: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda: NIH; 2007. (No. 07-4051). [Google Scholar]
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Coping with chronic illness. Patient Education. 1996 Retrieved September 13, 2004, from www.cc.nih.gov/ccc/patient_education/pepubs/copechron.pdf.
- Olshansky S. Chronic sorrow: A response to having a mentally defective child. Social Casework. 1962;43:190–193. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson-Sweeney K, McMullen A, Yoos HL, Kitzman H. Parental perceptions of their child’s asthma: Management and medication use. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2003;17(3):118–125. doi: 10.1067/mph.2003.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quittner AL, Drotar D, Iveres-Landis C, Slocum N, Seidner D, Jacobsen J. Adherence to medical treatments in adolescents with cystic fibrosis: The development and evaluation of family-based interventions. In: Drotar D, editor. Promoting Adherence to Medical Treatment in Chronic Childhood Illness: Concepts, Methods, and Interventions. 2000. pp. 383–407. [Google Scholar]
- Redline S, Gruchalla RS, Wolf RL, Yawn BP, Cartar L, Gan V, et al. Development and validation of school-based asthma and allergy screening questionnaires in a 4-city study. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 2004;93(1):36–48. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siersted HC, Boldsen J, Hansen HS, Mostgaard G, Hyldebrandt N. Population based study of risk factors for underdiagnosis of asthma in adolescence: Odense schoolchild study. BMJ. 1998;316:651–655. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Childhood asthma and student performance at school. Journal of School Health. 2005;75(8):296–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Townsend M, Feeny DH, Guyatt GH, Furlong WJ, Seip AE, Dolovich J. Evaluation of the burden of illness for pediatric asthmatic patients and their parents. Annals of Allergy. 1991;67(4):403–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trollvik A, Severinsson E. Parents’ experiences of asthma: Process from chaos to coping. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2004;6(2):93–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wray-Lake L, Flanagan CA, Osgood DW. Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior. 2010;42(1):61–85. doi: 10.1177/0013916509335163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wysocki T, Greco P, Harris MA, Bubb J, White NH. Behavior therapy for families of adolescents with diabetes: Maintenance of treatment effects. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):441–446. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yawn BP, Wollan P, Scanlon PD, Kurland M. Outcome results of a school-based screening program for undertreated asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2003;90(5):508–515. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61844-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeatts K, Davis KJ, Sotir M, Herget C, Shy C. Who gets diagnosed with asthma? Frequent wheeze among adolescents with and without a diagnosis of asthma. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5):1046–1054. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.5.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeatts K, Shy C, Sotir M, Music S, Herget C. Health consequences for children with undiagnosed asthma-like symptoms. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2003;157(6):540–544. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.6.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman BJ. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1989;81:329–339. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman BJ, editor. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman BJ, Bonner S, Evans D, Mellins RB. Self-regulating childhood asthma: A developmental model of family change. Health Education & Behavior. 1999;26(1):55–71. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
