Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2015 Jul 20;112(31):9542–9545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504467112

Impact of fossil fuel emissions on atmospheric radiocarbon and various applications of radiocarbon over this century

Heather D Graven 1,1
PMCID: PMC4534253  PMID: 26195757

Significance

A wide array of scientific disciplines and industries use radiocarbon analyses; for example, it is used in dating of archaeological specimens and in forensic identification of human and wildlife tissues, including traded ivory. Over the next century, fossil fuel emissions will produce a large amount of CO2 with no 14C because fossil fuels have lost all 14C over millions of years of radioactive decay. Atmospheric CO2, and therefore newly produced organic material, will appear as though it has “aged,” or lost 14C by decay. By 2050, fresh organic material could have the same 14C/C ratio as samples from 1050, and thus be indistinguishable by radiocarbon dating. Some current applications for 14C may cease to be viable, and other applications will be strongly affected.

Keywords: fossil fuel emissions, radiocarbon, atmospheric CO2, 14C dating, isotope forensics

Abstract

Radiocarbon analyses are commonly used in a broad range of fields, including earth science, archaeology, forgery detection, isotope forensics, and physiology. Many applications are sensitive to the radiocarbon (14C) content of atmospheric CO2, which has varied since 1890 as a result of nuclear weapons testing, fossil fuel emissions, and CO2 cycling between atmospheric, oceanic, and terrestrial carbon reservoirs. Over this century, the ratio 14C/C in atmospheric CO214CO2) will be determined by the amount of fossil fuel combustion, which decreases Δ14CO2 because fossil fuels have lost all 14C from radioactive decay. Simulations of Δ14CO2 using the emission scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, the Representative Concentration Pathways, indicate that ambitious emission reductions could sustain Δ14CO2 near the preindustrial level of 0‰ through 2100, whereas “business-as-usual” emissions will reduce Δ14CO2 to −250‰, equivalent to the depletion expected from over 2,000 y of radioactive decay. Given current emissions trends, fossil fuel emission-driven artificial “aging” of the atmosphere is likely to occur much faster and with a larger magnitude than previously expected. This finding has strong and as yet unrecognized implications for many applications of radiocarbon in various fields, and it implies that radiocarbon dating may no longer provide definitive ages for samples up to 2,000 y old.


Radiocarbon is produced naturally in the atmosphere and decays with a half-life of 5,700 ± 30 y (13). Fossil fuels, which are millions of years old, are therefore devoid of 14C, and their combustion adds only the stable isotopes 12C and 13C to the atmosphere as CO2. First observed by Hans Suess in 1955 using tree ring records of atmospheric composition (4), the dilution of 14CO2 by fossil carbon provided one of the first indications that human activities were strongly affecting the global carbon cycle. The apparent “aging” of the atmosphere—i.e., the decreasing trend in the ratio 14C/C of CO2 (reported as Δ14CO2) (5)—was interrupted in the 1950s when nuclear weapons testing produced an immense amount of “bomb” 14C that approximately doubled the 14C content of the atmosphere. Direct atmospheric observations began in the 1950s, capturing the rapid rise of Δ14CO2 and its subsequent quasi-exponential decay as the bomb 14C mixed into oceanic and biospheric reservoirs (69) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Model predictions of atmospheric radiocarbon for the RCPs. (Left) Atmospheric CO2 concentration (Top), CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Middle), and CO2 emissions from land use change (Bottom) in the RCP scenarios (11, 34). (Middle) Fossil fuel CO2 emitted to the atmosphere is shown with solid lines; dashed lines show net fossil fuel CO2 emitted, including “negative emissions” from biomass energy with carbon capture and storage. (Right) Observed (7, 10, 18, 35, 36) (1940–2012) and projected (2005–2100) radiocarbon content of atmospheric CO214CO2) (Table S2). The right axis shows the conventional radiocarbon age of a carbon-containing specimen with the same radiocarbon content, calculated by 8033 * ln (Δ14C/1,000 + 1). Filled areas indicate the range simulated for different sets of model parameters, each consistent with 20th-century atmospheric and oceanic Δ14C and CO2 observations, within their uncertainties (10) (SI Text).

Now that several decades have passed since the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the peak in atmospheric Δ14CO2, fossil fuel emissions are once again the main influence on the long-term trend in Δ14CO2 (7, 10). The growth or decline of fossil fuel emissions over the coming century determines to what extent Δ14CO2 will be diluted further by fossil carbon. Also important is how atmospheric Δ14CO2 dilution is moderated by natural exchanges of CO2 with the ocean and the terrestrial biosphere. Future dynamics of carbon and 14C are simulated here using the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) developed for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (11, 12), and a simple carbon cycle model with parameters constrained by 20th-century atmospheric and oceanic Δ14C and CO2 observations (10, 13) (SI Text).

The simple carbon cycle model includes a one-dimensional box diffusion model of the ocean and represents the atmosphere and the biosphere as one-box carbon reservoirs (10, 13, 14). Exchanges of carbon and 14C are governed by a small number of model parameters (Table S1). Multiple simulations were run using various parameter sets selected by their representation of Δ14C and inventories of CO2 and bomb 14C (1517). Atmospheric CO2 concentration and fossil fuel and land use fluxes were prescribed by the RCPs, which include historical data through 2005. To match the prescribed atmospheric CO2 concentration, the residual of carbon emissions and atmospheric and oceanic accumulation was added to the biospheric reservoir (single deconvolution). Atmospheric Δ14CO2 was prescribed by observations until 2005, then predicted by model fluxes from 2005 to 2100 (SI Text).

Table S1.

Parameter sets used in the carbon cycle model simulations

Keddy, m2⋅y−1 τam, y τab, y τba, y β
3,000 9 25 30 0
3,000 9 25 30 0.2
3,000 9 25 35 0
3,000 9 25 35 0.2
3,000 9 25 35 0.4
3,000 10 18 35 0
3,000 10 25 28 0
3,000 10 25 28 0.2
3,000 10 25 28 0.4
3,000 10 25 30 0
3,000 10 25 30 0.2
3,000 10 25 30 0.4
3,000 10 25 35 0
3,000 10 25 35 0.2
3,000 10 25 35 0.4
3,000 11 18 30 0
3,000 11 18 30 0.2
3,000 11 18 35 0
3,000 11 18 35 0.2
3,000 11 18 35 0.4
3,000 11 25 35 0
3,000 11 25 35 0.2
3,000 11 25 35 0.4
4,000 9 25 20 0
4,000 9 25 20 0.2
4,000 9 25 25 0
4,000 9 25 25 0.2
4,000 9 25 25 0.4
4,000 9 25 30 0
4,000 9 25 30 0.2
4,000 9 25 30 0.4
4,000 9 25 35 0
4,000 9 25 35 0.2
4,000 9 25 35 0.4
4,000 10 18 28 0
4,000 10 18 28 0.2
4,000 10 18 30 0
4,000 10 18 30 0.2
4,000 10 18 35 0
4,000 10 25 23 0
4,000 10 25 23 0.2
4,000 10 25 23 0.4
4,000 10 25 25 0
4,000 10 25 25 0.2
4,000 10 25 25 0.4
4,000 10 25 28 0
4,000 10 25 28 0.2
4,000 10 25 28 0.4
4,000 10 25 30 0
4,000 10 25 30 0.2
4,000 10 25 30 0.4
4,000 10 25 35 0
4,000 10 25 35 0.2
4,000 10 25 35 0.4
4,000 11 18 28 0
4,000 11 18 28 0.2
4,000 11 18 28 0.4
4,000 11 18 30 0
4,000 11 18 30 0.2
4,000 11 18 30 0.4
4,000 11 18 35 0
4,000 11 18 35 0.2
4,000 11 18 35 0.4
4,000 11 25 28 0
4,000 11 25 28 0.2
4,000 11 25 28 0.4
4,000 11 25 30 0
4,000 11 25 30 0.2
4,000 11 25 30 0.4
4,000 11 25 35 0.4
5,000 9 25 20 0
5,000 9 25 20 0.2
5,000 9 25 25 0
5,000 9 25 25 0.2
5,000 9 25 25 0.4
5,000 9 25 30 0
5,000 9 25 30 0.2
5,000 9 25 30 0.4
5,000 9 25 35 0
5,000 10 18 28 0
5,000 10 18 28 0.2
5,000 10 18 28 0.4
5,000 10 18 30 0
5,000 10 18 30 0.2
5,000 10 25 20 0
5,000 10 25 20 0.2
5,000 10 25 20 0.4
5,000 10 25 23 0
5,000 10 25 23 0.2
5,000 10 25 23 0.4
5,000 10 25 25 0
5,000 10 25 25 0.2
5,000 10 25 25 0.4
5,000 10 25 28 0
5,000 10 25 28 0.2
5,000 10 25 28 0.4
5,000 10 25 30 0.2
5,000 10 25 30 0.4
5,000 10 25 35 0.4
5,000 11 18 28 0
5,000 11 18 28 0.2
5,000 11 18 28 0.4
5,000 11 18 30 0
5,000 11 18 30 0.2
5,000 11 18 30 0.4
5,000 11 18 35 0
5,000 11 18 35 0.2
5,000 11 18 35 0.4
6,000 10 25 20 0.4
6,000 10 25 23 0.4
6,000 10 25 25 0.4
6,000 11 18 28 0
6,000 11 18 28 0.2
6,000 11 18 28 0.4
6,000 11 18 30 0
6,000 11 18 30 0.2
6,000 11 18 30 0.4

Results

From its present value of ∼20‰ (18), which signifies a 2% enrichment in 14C/C of CO2 above preindustrial levels, Δ14CO2 is certain to cross below the preindustrial level of 0‰ by 2030, but potentially as soon as 2019 (Fig. 1, Table S2). After 2030, simulated Δ14CO2 trends diverge according to the continued growth, slowing, or reversal of fossil fuel CO2 emissions in the RCP scenarios. Distinct patterns are simulated for different RCPs despite the range of model parameters used, indicating the fossil fuel emissions scenario is the determining factor for long-term Δ14CO2 trends in these simulations rather than the rates of carbon cycling.

Table S2.

Tabulated annual midrange (Mid), maximum (Max), and minimum (Min) Δ14CO2 simulated for each RCP, 2005–2100 (in ‰)

Year RCP2.6 RCP4.5 RCP6.0 RCP8.5
Mid Min Max Mid Min Max Mid Min Max Mid Min Max
2005 66.3 64.8 67.7 66.3 64.8 67.7 66.3 64.8 67.7 66.3 64.8 67.7
2006 62.0 60.5 63.4 62.0 60.5 63.4 62.0 60.5 63.4 62.0 60.5 63.4
2007 57.2 55.4 59.0 57.3 55.5 59.1 57.3 55.5 59.1 57.2 55.4 59.0
2008 52.9 50.4 55.3 53.0 50.6 55.5 53.1 50.6 55.5 52.8 50.3 55.2
2009 48.5 45.3 51.6 48.8 45.6 51.9 48.9 45.7 52.1 48.3 45.2 51.5
2010 44.1 40.3 48.0 44.6 40.7 48.4 44.8 40.9 48.6 43.9 40.1 47.7
2011 39.9 35.4 44.3 40.5 36.0 44.9 40.8 36.3 45.2 39.5 35.1 44.0
2012 35.8 30.8 40.8 36.4 31.4 41.4 36.9 31.9 41.9 35.1 30.1 40.1
2013 31.9 26.3 37.4 32.5 27.0 38.1 33.2 27.7 38.8 30.7 25.1 36.2
2014 28.2 22.1 34.3 28.7 22.6 34.7 29.7 23.7 35.8 26.3 20.2 32.4
2015 24.7 18.1 31.2 25.0 18.4 31.5 26.3 19.8 32.9 22.0 15.4 28.6
2016 21.3 14.2 28.3 21.3 14.3 28.3 23.1 16.0 30.1 17.6 10.5 24.7
2017 18.0 10.5 25.4 17.7 10.2 25.2 19.9 12.4 27.3 13.3 5.7 20.8
2018 14.8 6.9 22.6 14.2 6.3 22.0 16.8 9.0 24.7 8.9 1.0 16.9
2019 11.6 3.4 19.9 10.7 2.4 18.9 13.8 5.6 22.0 4.6 −3.7 12.9
2020 8.6 0.0 17.2 7.2 −1.4 15.8 10.9 2.3 19.5 0.3 −8.4 9.0
2021 5.7 −3.2 14.6 3.8 −5.1 12.7 8.0 −0.9 16.9 −4.0 −13.0 5.0
2022 3.0 −6.2 12.3 0.4 −8.8 9.7 5.2 −4.0 14.3 −8.3 −17.6 1.1
2023 0.6 −8.9 10.1 −2.8 −12.4 6.7 2.3 −7.2 11.8 −12.5 −22.1 −2.8
2024 −1.6 −11.3 8.2 −6.1 −15.8 3.7 −0.5 −10.3 9.2 −16.6 −26.5 −6.7
2025 −3.6 −13.6 6.4 −9.3 −19.3 0.8 −3.4 −13.3 6.6 −20.7 −30.9 −10.6
2026 −5.4 −15.7 4.8 −12.4 −22.6 −2.1 −6.2 −16.4 4.0 −24.8 −35.2 −14.4
2027 −7.1 −17.5 3.3 −15.5 −25.9 −5.0 −9.0 −19.4 1.4 −28.8 −39.4 −18.3
2028 −8.7 −19.3 1.9 −18.5 −29.1 −7.9 −11.8 −22.3 −1.2 −32.8 −43.6 −22.0
2029 −10.1 −20.9 0.7 −21.5 −32.3 −10.7 −14.5 −25.3 −3.8 −36.8 −47.7 −25.8
2030 −11.4 −22.3 −0.5 −24.4 −35.4 −13.5 −17.3 −28.2 −6.3 −40.7 −51.8 −29.6
2031 −12.6 −23.7 −1.5 −27.3 −38.5 −16.2 −20.0 −31.1 −8.9 −44.6 −55.8 −33.3
2032 −13.6 −24.9 −2.4 −30.1 −41.4 −18.9 −22.8 −34.1 −11.6 −48.5 −59.8 −37.1
2033 −14.6 −25.9 −3.2 −32.9 −44.3 −21.5 −25.6 −37.0 −14.2 −52.4 −63.9 −40.9
2034 −15.4 −26.8 −3.9 −35.5 −47.0 −24.0 −28.4 −40.0 −16.9 −56.3 −67.9 −44.7
2035 −16.1 −27.6 −4.5 −38.1 −49.7 −26.5 −31.3 −42.9 −19.6 −60.2 −71.9 −48.5
2036 −16.7 −28.3 −5.0 −40.6 −52.3 −28.9 −34.1 −45.9 −22.3 −64.1 −75.9 −52.3
2037 −17.2 −28.9 −5.5 −43.0 −54.8 −31.2 −37.0 −48.9 −25.1 −68.0 −79.9 −56.1
2038 −17.6 −29.4 −5.8 −45.4 −57.3 −33.5 −39.8 −51.8 −27.8 −71.9 −83.9 −59.9
2039 −17.9 −29.8 −6.1 −47.7 −59.7 −35.8 −42.7 −54.8 −30.6 −75.8 −87.8 −63.7
2040 −18.2 −30.1 −6.2 −50.0 −62.0 −38.0 −45.5 −57.7 −33.4 −79.6 −91.7 −67.6
2041 −18.4 −30.4 −6.4 −52.2 −64.3 −40.2 −48.4 −60.6 −36.1 −83.5 −95.6 −71.4
2042 −18.6 −30.6 −6.5 −54.4 −66.5 −42.3 −51.2 −63.5 −38.9 −87.3 −99.4 −75.2
2043 −18.8 −30.8 −6.7 −56.4 −68.6 −44.3 −54.0 −66.4 −41.7 −91.2 −103.3 −79.1
2044 −19.0 −31.1 −6.9 −58.4 −70.6 −46.2 −56.9 −69.3 −44.4 −95.0 −107.2 −82.9
2045 −19.2 −31.3 −7.1 −60.3 −72.5 −48.1 −59.6 −72.1 −47.2 −98.9 −111.0 −86.8
2046 −19.4 −31.6 −7.3 −62.1 −74.3 −49.9 −62.4 −74.9 −49.9 −102.8 −114.9 −90.6
2047 −19.7 −31.8 −7.5 −63.9 −76.1 −51.7 −65.2 −77.7 −52.6 −106.6 −118.7 −94.4
2048 −19.9 −32.0 −7.7 −65.6 −77.8 −53.4 −67.9 −80.5 −55.3 −110.4 −122.5 −98.2
2049 −20.0 −32.2 −7.9 −67.2 −79.5 −55.0 −70.6 −83.2 −58.0 −114.1 −126.3 −101.9
2050 −20.2 −32.4 −8.1 −68.9 −81.0 −56.7 −73.3 −85.9 −60.7 −117.9 −130.1 −105.7
2051 −20.4 −32.5 −8.2 −70.4 −82.6 −58.2 −76.0 −88.6 −63.4 −121.6 −133.8 −109.4
2052 −20.5 −32.7 −8.4 −71.8 −84.0 −59.6 −78.7 −91.3 −66.1 −125.3 −137.6 −113.1
2053 −20.6 −32.7 −8.5 −73.1 −85.2 −61.0 −81.4 −94.0 −68.8 −129.1 −141.5 −116.8
2054 −20.7 −32.8 −8.6 −74.3 −86.4 −62.1 −84.1 −96.6 −71.5 −132.9 −145.3 −120.4
2055 −20.7 −32.8 −8.6 −75.3 −87.5 −63.2 −86.7 −99.3 −74.2 −136.6 −149.1 −124.1
2056 −20.7 −32.8 −8.7 −76.3 −88.4 −64.1 −89.4 −101.9 −76.8 −140.3 −152.9 −127.7
2057 −20.7 −32.7 −8.7 −77.2 −89.3 −65.0 −92.0 −104.6 −79.4 −144.0 −156.7 −131.3
2058 −20.7 −32.7 −8.6 −78.0 −90.1 −65.8 −94.6 −107.2 −82.1 −147.6 −160.4 −134.9
2059 −20.6 −32.6 −8.6 −78.7 −90.8 −66.6 −97.2 −109.8 −84.7 −151.3 −164.1 −138.4
2060 −20.5 −32.4 −8.5 −79.4 −91.5 −67.3 −99.8 −112.3 −87.3 −154.9 −167.8 −142.0
2061 −20.3 −32.3 −8.4 −80.0 −92.1 −67.9 −102.4 −114.9 −89.9 −158.4 −171.4 −145.4
2062 −20.2 −32.1 −8.3 −80.5 −92.6 −68.5 −105.0 −117.4 −92.5 −161.9 −174.9 −148.9
2063 −20.1 −31.9 −8.3 −81.0 −93.0 −68.9 −107.5 −120.0 −95.0 −165.3 −178.4 −152.2
2064 −19.9 −31.7 −8.1 −81.4 −93.3 −69.4 −110.0 −122.4 −97.6 −168.6 −181.8 −155.5
2065 −19.8 −31.5 −8.0 −81.7 −93.6 −69.7 −112.5 −124.9 −100.1 −171.9 −185.1 −158.7
2066 −19.6 −31.3 −7.9 −81.9 −93.8 −70.0 −115.0 −127.4 −102.7 −175.1 −188.4 −161.8
2067 −19.4 −31.1 −7.8 −82.1 −94.0 −70.2 −117.5 −129.9 −105.2 −178.3 −191.6 −165.0
2068 −19.2 −30.8 −7.7 −82.2 −94.1 −70.4 −120.0 −132.3 −107.7 −181.4 −194.7 −168.0
2069 −19.0 −30.5 −7.5 −82.3 −94.2 −70.5 −122.5 −134.8 −110.2 −184.4 −197.8 −171.0
2070 −18.8 −30.3 −7.3 −82.4 −94.2 −70.6 −124.9 −137.2 −112.6 −187.4 −200.9 −174.0
2071 −18.6 −30.0 −7.2 −82.4 −94.2 −70.6 −127.4 −139.7 −115.1 −190.4 −203.9 −176.9
2072 −18.4 −29.7 −7.0 −82.3 −94.1 −70.6 −129.8 −142.2 −117.4 −193.3 −206.8 −179.8
2073 −18.2 −29.4 −6.9 −82.2 −93.9 −70.5 −132.2 −144.6 −119.8 −196.1 −209.6 −182.6
2074 −18.0 −29.2 −6.8 −82.0 −93.7 −70.3 −134.5 −146.9 −122.0 −198.9 −212.4 −185.3
2075 −17.8 −29.0 −6.7 −81.7 −93.4 −70.1 −136.7 −149.2 −124.3 −201.5 −215.1 −188.0
2076 −17.7 −28.8 −6.6 −81.4 −93.0 −69.8 −138.9 −151.4 −126.4 −204.2 −217.7 −190.6
2077 −17.6 −28.6 −6.6 −81.0 −92.6 −69.4 −141.1 −153.6 −128.6 −206.7 −220.3 −193.2
2078 −17.4 −28.3 −6.5 −80.6 −92.1 −69.0 −143.2 −155.8 −130.6 −209.3 −222.9 −195.7
2079 −17.3 −28.1 −6.4 −80.1 −91.6 −68.6 −145.3 −157.9 −132.7 −211.8 −225.4 −198.1
2080 −17.1 −27.9 −6.4 −79.5 −91.0 −68.1 −147.3 −160.0 −134.7 −214.2 −227.8 −200.6
2081 −17.0 −27.7 −6.3 −79.0 −90.4 −67.6 −149.3 −161.9 −136.7 −216.6 −230.2 −203.0
2082 −16.9 −27.6 −6.3 −78.5 −89.9 −67.2 −151.1 −163.7 −138.4 −219.0 −232.6 −205.3
2083 −16.8 −27.4 −6.3 −78.2 −89.5 −66.9 −152.6 −165.3 −140.0 −221.3 −234.9 −207.6
2084 −16.8 −27.3 −6.3 −77.9 −89.1 −66.6 −154.0 −166.7 −141.3 −223.5 −237.1 −209.9
2085 −16.7 −27.1 −6.3 −77.7 −88.9 −66.5 −155.2 −167.9 −142.5 −225.7 −239.4 −212.1
2086 −16.6 −27.0 −6.3 −77.5 −88.7 −66.4 −156.2 −168.9 −143.5 −227.9 −241.5 −214.3
2087 −16.6 −26.9 −6.3 −77.4 −88.5 −66.4 −157.1 −169.8 −144.4 −230.0 −243.6 −216.4
2088 −16.6 −26.8 −6.4 −77.4 −88.4 −66.4 −157.9 −170.6 −145.1 −232.1 −245.7 −218.5
2089 −16.5 −26.7 −6.4 −77.4 −88.4 −66.5 −158.5 −171.3 −145.8 −234.1 −247.8 −220.5
2090 −16.5 −26.6 −6.5 −77.5 −88.3 −66.6 −159.1 −171.9 −146.3 −236.1 −249.8 −222.4
2091 −16.5 −26.5 −6.5 −77.5 −88.4 −66.7 −159.6 −172.4 −146.8 −238.1 −251.8 −224.3
2092 −16.5 −26.4 −6.6 −77.7 −88.4 −66.9 −160.1 −172.9 −147.4 −240.0 −253.8 −226.2
2093 −16.5 −26.3 −6.7 −77.8 −88.5 −67.1 −160.7 −173.4 −147.9 −241.9 −255.8 −228.0
2094 −16.5 −26.3 −6.8 −77.9 −88.5 −67.4 −161.3 −174.0 −148.5 −243.8 −257.9 −229.8
2095 −16.6 −26.2 −6.9 −78.1 −88.6 −67.6 −161.9 −174.6 −149.1 −245.7 −259.8 −231.5
2096 −16.6 −26.2 −7.0 −78.3 −88.8 −67.9 −162.5 −175.2 −149.8 −247.5 −261.8 −233.3
2097 −16.7 −26.2 −7.1 −78.5 −88.9 −68.1 −163.1 −175.8 −150.4 −249.3 −263.7 −235.0
2098 −16.7 −26.2 −7.3 −78.8 −89.2 −68.4 −163.8 −176.4 −151.1 −251.1 −265.5 −236.6
2099 −16.8 −26.2 −7.4 −79.1 −89.4 −68.7 −164.4 −177.1 −151.8 −252.8 −267.4 −238.3
2100 −16.8 −26.2 −7.5 −79.3 −89.6 −69.0 −165.1 −177.7 −152.5 −254.5 −269.2 −239.9

In the low-emission RCP2.6 simulation where fossil fuel emissions decrease after 2020, Δ14CO2 remains nearly constant around −15‰ through the end of the century (Fig. 1). Fossil fuel emissions in the RCP4.5 and RCP6.0 scenarios continue to rise and then peak later, around 2040 and 2080, reducing Δ14CO2 to a level of −80‰ (RCP4.5) or −150‰ (RCP6.0) in 2100.

The business-as-usual emissions in RCP8.5 reduce Δ14CO2 more rapidly and more dramatically than the other RCPs: Δ14CO2 is less than −100‰ by 2050 and reaches −250‰ in 2100, which means that atmospheric CO2 in 2100 is as depleted in 14C as the “oldest” part of the ocean (19) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Simulation of radiocarbon in various carbon reservoirs for the low-emission and business-as-usual RCPs. Simulated Δ14C in biospheric and four ocean carbon reservoirs, surface mixed layer, 300, 600, and 3,500 m in RCP2.6 (Left) and RCP8.5 (Right). The black line shows the midrange value of simulated atmospheric Δ14CO2 (full simulated range of Δ14CO2 is shown in Fig. 1).

The simulated trends in atmospheric Δ14CO2 propagate to other carbon reservoirs through natural carbon exchanges (Fig. 2). Reduction of fossil fuel emissions in RCP2.6 leads to nearly steady Δ14C in atmospheric, biospheric, and upper ocean carbon in 2100, slightly elevated above preindustrial levels.

As atmospheric Δ14CO2 decreases strongly in the higher-emission scenarios, it becomes much more depleted in 14C than actively overturning carbon in the oceanic and biospheric reservoirs (shown for RCP8.5 in Fig. 2). After 2050, the simulated air–sea gradient of Δ14C in RCP8.5 is −50‰, opposite of the preindustrial gradient, and by 2100 atmospheric Δ14CO2 is 150‰ lower than Δ14C at midthermocline depths of 600 m. Reversal of Δ14C gradients causes natural exchanges to transfer 14C from the ocean to the atmosphere (Fig. S1), as shown by Caldeira et al. (20). Caldeira et al. (20) used a similar carbon cycle model with the IS92-A scenario from the IPCC Third Assessment Report (21), which is comparable to RCP6.0. Emissions over the past 10 y have outpaced the IS92-A and RCP6.0 scenarios, and are currently on track to follow RCP8.5 (22). Δ14CO2 is nearly 50‰ lower in 2050 and 100‰ lower in 2100 in RCP8.5 compared with RCP6.0 (Fig. 1), suggesting that fossil fuel emissions are likely to reduce Δ14CO2 much faster than expected from the IS92-A scenario used by Caldeira et al. (20). As a result, the atmospheric inventory of 14C could approach the peak 14C inventory from the early 1960s later this century (Fig. S1).

Fig. S1.

Fig. S1.

Simulated radiocarbon inventories, relative to 1950, in atmospheric, oceanic, and biospheric reservoirs for the simulations shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The atmospheric radiocarbon inventory over 1950–2005 is shown in each panel.

Discussion

Though these simulations indicate tremendous changes to the global radiocarbon cycle and the use of radiocarbon in earth science and biogeochemical research, the potential impacts of future trends in Δ14CO2 are much broader. Radiocarbon is currently used in a wide array of scientific and industrial applications, many of which exploit its radioactive decay to determine the age of carbon-containing specimens through radiocarbon dating.

Atmospheric CO2 is presently aging at a rate of ∼30 y⋅y−1, and by 2050 the atmosphere could appear to be 1,000 y old in conventional radiocarbon age (Fig. 1). In 2100, atmospheric CO2 in RCP8.5 has the same radiocarbon content as a specimen that has undergone 2,000 y of radioactive decay—i.e., a specimen originating around AD 100. The aging of the atmosphere predicted by these simulations has the potential to severely impact the use of radiocarbon dating. Within the next 85 y, the atmosphere may experience Δ14CO2 corresponding to conventional ages from within the historical period encompassing the Roman, Medieval and Imperial Eras. For archaeological or other items that are found without sufficient context to rule out a modern origin, radiocarbon dating will give ambiguous results.

Radiocarbon has various applications in isotope forensics (23). Some applications use the presence of elevated Δ14C in a sample to distinguish its origin to be subsequent to 1950, whereas other applications use the rapid changes in Δ14CO2 after 1963 (the so-called “bomb curve”) to distinguish the year of origin of a sample more precisely. These techniques have been used to test vintages of wine and whisky, identify the age of human remains, and detect illegal ivory trading (2325). As with radiocarbon dating, forthcoming Δ14CO2 changes are likely to introduce ambiguity into these techniques, and the presence of elevated Δ14CO2 will not identify samples with recent origins beyond ∼2030.

If the lower-emission RCPs 2.6 or 4.5 were followed instead of business-as-usual RCP8.5, the simulated stabilization of Δ14CO2 (Fig. 1) would hinder the use of radiocarbon in fields such as ecology and physiology. These applications take advantage of the decreasing trend in Δ14CO2 since the 1960s to evaluate the decadal-scale rate of turnover of carbon in soil compounds (26) or human cells (27), for example. Annual changes in Δ14CO2 could become undetectable in two to three decades if CO2 emissions are rapidly reduced, thereby limiting the use of these applications.

Another prominent application for radiocarbon involves the identification of CO2 emitted by fossil fuel combustion in urban or continental regions (28, 29). Here too, the projected atmospheric changes will have a major impact. The sensitivity of Δ14CO2 to local additions of fossil fuel-derived CO2 depends on the concentration of atmospheric CO2 and the Δ14C disequilibrium between atmospheric CO2 and fossil carbon (being 14C-free, the Δ14C of fossil fuels is −1,000‰). Neglecting other effects, the sensitivity of Δ14CO2 to fossil fuel-derived CO2 is approximated by α ∼ (−1,000‰ − Δ14CO2)/CO2. The ratio α is presently −2.6‰ ppm−1, but it drops to −1.6‰ ppm−1 by 2050 and to −0.8‰ ppm−1 by 2100 in RCP8.5; this suggests that measurement precision will have to increase by approximately a factor of 2 in the next few decades simply to maintain current detection capabilities for fossil fuel-derived CO2.

Simulated trends in Δ14CO2 therefore motivate new efforts to improve precision in radiocarbon measurements and to develop ancillary measurements that can help resolve ambiguity in radiocarbon analyses. The development of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) in the 1980s dramatically reduced the amount of time and the amount of carbon needed for analysis, compared with traditional decay counting techniques (30, 31). Further improvement in the precision of 14C detection by AMS is needed, as well as reductions in other sources of uncertainty (32), which may change as atmospheric Δ14CO2 decreases. Ever-higher requirements in precision will also need to be met by alternative measurement techniques currently in development (33).

Fossil fuel emissions are now increasing faster than ever before. Continued business-as-usual growth in emissions will cause the atmosphere to approach a 1,000-y-old radiocarbon age by 2050 and a 2,000-y-old age by 2100. The application of radiocarbon in a wide array of disciplines implies that changing atmospheric radiocarbon content will have far-reaching impacts.

SI Text

A simple model based on Oeschger et al. (10, 13) was used to simulate carbon cycling in atmospheric, oceanic, and biospheric reservoirs. The model includes one atmospheric box, one biospheric box, and a one-dimensional box diffusion ocean model with 43 ocean boxes. The one-box atmosphere does not resolve horizontal gradients or gradients between the troposphere and stratosphere. The model was run in single deconvolution mode using RCP-specified CO2 and emissions from 1765 to 2100 (34) after a 30,000-y spin-up time.

For Δ14C, spatially averaged tropospheric observations were used to specify atmospheric Δ14C up to 2005 (10). After 2005, atmospheric Δ14C was simulated by model fluxes. Radioactive decay was included, and natural 14C production was specified by the simulated total 14C inventory after model spin-up, specific to the model parameters. Production of 14C by the nuclear industry was assumed to remain constant at 2008 values (37) for 2005–2100. Negative emissions occur by biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) (11), such that carbon with the isotopic composition of that entering the biospheric reservoir was removed from the system. Data on BECCS in the RCPs was provided by the RCP Task Group. To calculate fossil fuel CO2 emitted to the atmosphere (Fig. 1), BECCS fluxes were added to net fossil fuel emissions. Since the BECCS data is based on nonharmonized emissions, there may be some discrepancy with net fossil fuel emissions before 2040 in RCP2.6, however this is unlikely to have a significant impact on the simulations.

Separate simulations were run using 117 sets of model parameters. The parameter sets were selected to explore carbon cycle dynamics across a range of parameter space that is consistent with CO2 and Δ14C observations, within the context of the simple model running in single deconvolution mode. Parameter sets were chosen from a larger ensemble by examining the simulated oceanic Δ14C and oceanic bomb 14C and anthropogenic CO2 inventories and the simulated total bomb 14C inventories, and selecting those sets that matched 20th-century observations, within their uncertainties (10). The parameter sets include values for the eddy diffusivity (Keddy) of 3,000–6,000 m2⋅y−1, atmospheric CO2 residence time with respect to exchange with the mixed layer of 9–11 y (τam, corresponding to piston velocities of 14.8–18.1 cm⋅h−1), atmospheric CO2 residence time with respect to biospheric exchange (τab) of 18–25 y, biospheric residence time (τba) of 20–35 y, and CO2 fertilization factor (β) of 0–0.4 (10). The model neglects the rapidly overturned biospheric carbon that is returned to the atmosphere within 1–3 y, one-third or more of net primary productivity (10, 14).

The governing equations of the model follow Oeschger et al. (13), and a brief presentation is included here. The single deconvolution residual (S) is given by the difference between the prescribed atmospheric growth rate (dCa/dt) and the sum of net fossil fuel (F) and land use (L) emissions and the simulated oceanic and biospheric uptake:

S=[12.12(F+L+1τbaCb)1τam(CaCeq)1τab(Ca+β(CaCaPI))]dCadt,

where Ca is the atmospheric CO2 concentration (in ppm) and CPIa is the preindustrial CO2 concentration, Cb is the total carbon in the biospheric reservoir in PgC, Ceq is the pCO2 of the mixed layer box of the box diffusion model, calculated following Peng et al. (38) using temperature of 18 °C and salinity of 35 per mille. Units of mol⋅m−3 are used for carbon in ocean boxes. The factor 2.12 converts between ppm and PgC units. S is added to the biospheric reservoir.

The model simulates 14C using the following equations for the atmosphere, biosphere, ocean mixed layer, and a representative ocean subsurface box. The atmospheric equation shows the prognostic 14C simulation used after 2005; atmospheric 14C (C14a) was prescribed by observations before 2005. B is carbon removed by BECCS. The model also simulates 13C using similar equations, and simulated δ13C is used to calculate Δ14C in each reservoir (5).

Atmosphere:

dCa14dt=1τam(αma14Rm14Ceqαam14Ca14)1τabαab14Ra14(Ca+β(CaCaPI))+12.12(1τbaCb14+LRb14)Sαab14Ra14λCa14+Pnat+Pnuc12.12αab14Ra14B

Biosphere:

dCb14dt=2.12(1τabαab14Ra14(Ca+β(CaCaPI))+Sαab14Ra14)1τbaCb14LRb14λCb14

Mixed layer, subscripts m − 1 and m − 2 denote the two ocean boxes below the mixed layer:

dCm14dt=kma(αam14Ca14αma14Rm14Ceq)+Km(3Cm14+4Cm114Cm214)λCm14

Representative subsurface box s, subscripts s + 1 and s − 1 denote ocean boxes above and below box s:

dCs14dt=Ks(Cs1142Cs14+Cs+114)λCs14

R14 denotes the ratio 14C/C. The decay constant of 14C is represented with λ, and Pnat and Pnuc denote production by natural cosmic radiation and by nuclear power plants. Fractionation factors are given by α. The parameter kma is related to τam, accounting for the mixed layer thickness and unit conversion. The exchange coefficients between ocean boxes (Km, Ks) are determined by the eddy diffusivity parameter (Keddy) and the thickness of the boxes, 75 m in the mixed layer, 25 m in the thermocline, and 546 m in the deep ocean (13). In the form of the equations given above, the single deconvolution residual and the land use emissions are positive; slightly different forms are used if these terms are negative, relating to uptake or release from the biosphere and the associated fractionation.

The model was run in MATLAB R2013b using the ode23tb routine with default settings. An annual time step was used in the model output, although the ode23tb routine uses variable time steps in calculating the solution.

Simulated Δ14C are plotted in Figs. 1 and 2, including the range across different parameter sets. Fig. S1 shows the simulated inventory of radiocarbon atoms, relative to 1950, in atmospheric, biospheric, and oceanic reservoirs. Table S2 lists midrange values for simulated Δ14CO2 in addition to upper and lower bounds of the simulated ranges. Table S1 lists the 117 parameter sets that were used in the simulations.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks S. Frolking, P. Reimer, E. Kato, and T. Guilderson for helpful discussions, and the RCP Task Group for providing CO2 concentration and emission scenarios. Support for this work was provided by the European Commission through a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1504467112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Godwin H. Half-life of radiocarbon. Nature. 1962;195:984. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Libby WF, Anderson EC, Arnold JR. Age determination by radiocarbon content: World-wide assay of natural radiocarbon. Science. 1949;109(2827):227–228. doi: 10.1126/science.109.2827.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roberts ML, Southon JR. A preliminary determination of the absolute 14C/12C ratio of OX-I. Radiocarbon. 2007;49(2):441–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suess HE. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science. 1955;122(3166):415–417. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stuiver M, Polach HA. Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon. 1977;19(3):355–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rafter TA, Fergusson GJ. “Atom bomb effect”—Recent increase of carbon-14 content of the atmosphere and biosphere. Science. 1957;126(3273):557–558. doi: 10.1126/science.126.3273.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levin I, et al. Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14CO2. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 2010;62(1):26–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Manning MR, et al. The use of radiocarbon measurements in atmospheric studies. Radiocarbon. 1990;32(1):37–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nydal R, Lövseth K. Tracing bomb 14C in the atmosphere. J Geophys Res. 1983;88(C6):3621–3642. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Graven HD, Guilderson TP, Keeling RF. Observations of radiocarbon in CO2 at La Jolla, California, USA 1992-2007: Analysis of the long-term trend. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2012;117(D2):D02302. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Vuuren DP, et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Clim Change. 2011;109(1-2):5–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Stocker TF, et al (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK)
  • 13.Oeschger H, Siegenthaler U, Schotterer U, Gugelmann A. A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature. Tellus. 1975;27(2):168–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keeling CD, et al. 1989. A three-dimensional model of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds: 1. Analysis of observational data. Aspects of Climate Variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas, ed Peterson DH (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC), pp 165–236.
  • 15.Naegler T, Levin I. Closing the global radiocarbon budget 1945–2005. J Geophys Res. 2006;111(D12) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Naegler T. Reconciliation of excess 14C-constrained global CO2 piston velocity estimates. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 2009;61(2):372–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sabine CL, et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science. 2004;305(5682):367–371. doi: 10.1126/science.1097403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Levin I, Kromer B, Hammer S. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 2013;65:20092. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Key RM, et al. A global ocean carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP) Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2004 doi: 10.1029/2004GB002247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Caldeira K, Rau GH, Duffy PB. Predicted net efflux of radiocarbon from the ocean and increase in atmospheric radiocarbon content. Geophys Res Lett. 1998;25(20):3811–3814. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leggett J, Pepper WJ, Swart RJ. Emissions Scenarios for IPCC: An update. In: Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK, editors. Climate Change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge Univ Press; Cambridge, UK: 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peters GP, et al. The challenge to keep global warming below 2°C. Nature Climate Change. 2012;3(1):4–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Geyh MA. Bomb radiocarbon dating of animal tissues and hair. Radiocarbon. 2001;43(2B):723–730. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Uno KT, et al. Bomb-curve radiocarbon measurement of recent biologic tissues and applications to wildlife forensics and stable isotope (paleo)ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(29):11736–11741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302226110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ubelaker DH. Artificial radiocarbon as an indicator of recent origin of organic remains in forensic cases. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(6):1285–1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trumbore SE. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(2):399–411. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Spalding KL, Bhardwaj RD, Buchholz BA, Druid H, Frisén J. Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell. 2005;122(1):133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levin I, Kromer B, Schmidt M, Sartorius H. A novel approach for independent budgeting of fossil fuel CO2 over Europe by 14CO2 observations. Geophys Res Lett. 2003 doi: 10.1029/2003GL018477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Turnbull JC, et al. Comparison of 14CO2, CO, and SF6 as tracers for recently added fossil fuel CO2 in the atmosphere and implications for biological CO2 exchange. Geophys Res Lett. 2006 doi: 10.1029/2005GL024213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vogel JS, Turteltaub KW, Finkel R, Nelson DE. Accelerator mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1995;67(11):353A–359A. doi: 10.1021/ac00107a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Elmore D, Phillips FM. Accelerator mass spectrometry for measurement of long-lived radioisotopes. Science. 1987;236(4801):543–550. doi: 10.1126/science.236.4801.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Graven HD, Guilderson TP, Keeling RF. Methods for high-precision 14C AMS measurement of atmospheric CO2 at LLNL. Radiocarbon. 2007;49(2):349–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Galli I, et al. Molecular gas sensing below parts per trillion: Radiocarbon-dioxide optical detection. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(27):270802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.270802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meinshausen M, et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change. 2011;109(1-2):213–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Graven HD, Guilderson TP, Keeling RF. Observations of radiocarbon in CO2 at seven global sampling sites in the Scripps flask network: Analysis of spatial gradients and seasonal cycles. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2012;117(D2):D02303. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Braziunas TF. High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarbon. 1998;40(3):1127–1151. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Graven HD, Gruber N. 2011. Continental-scale enrichment of atmospheric 14CO2 from the nuclear power industry: Potential impact on the estimation of fossil fuel-derived CO2. Atmos Chem Phys 11:12339–12349.
  • 38.Peng TH, Takahashi T, Broecker WS, Olafsson JON. Seasonal variability of carbon dioxide, nutrients and oxygen in the northern North Atlantic surface water: Observations and a model*. Tellus B Chem Phys Meterol. 1987;39(5):439–458. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES