Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 Aug 31;40(6):675–681. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387924

Are Microparticles the Missing Link between Thrombosis and Autoimmune Diseases? Involvement in Selected Rheumatologic Diseases

Melissa Cunningham 1, Natalia Marks 2, April Barnado 1, Jena R Wirth 1, Gary Gilkeson 1, Margaret Markiewicz 1
PMCID: PMC4535344  NIHMSID: NIHMS713557  PMID: 25173498

Abstract

Microparticles (MPs) are membrane-bound vesicles with important physiologic effects. MPs exchange information intercellularly, with each kind of MP carrying antigens and receptors of the cells from which they originated. They are biologic effectors in inflammation, angiogenesis, vascular injury, and thrombosis. Thrombosis is generally caused by abnormalities in blood flow, blood composition, and/or properties of the vessel wall. Thrombosis is a well-described feature of cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that increased risk of thrombosis is also characteristic of autoimmune disorders and immune-mediated diseases affecting all age groups, although the older adults are most vulnerable. Current research has also implicated MPs as a source of autoantigenic nuclear material that can form immune complexes, activate the innate immune system, and may lead to autoimmunity. This review focuses on the contribution of MPs to both the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and, as the immune and coagulation systems are tightly linked, their role in hypercoagulability in the setting of autoimmunity in an aging population.

Keywords: microparticles, thrombosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic, lupus erythematosus

Thrombosis, Aging, and Immunity

Thrombosis is the formation of a blood clot (thrombus) inside a blood vessel leading to obstruction of blood flow. Abnormalities in the composition of the blood (e.g., thrombophilia), properties of the vessel wall (endothelial cell [EC] injury) and/or quality of the blood flow (stasis and turbulence) can all contribute.1 Thrombosis can affect children, young adults, and older adults; however, risk factors and frequency differ with age.2 The number of risk factors required to increase the chance of thrombosis decreases with age. Aging significantly increases coagulation system proteins such as fibrinogen, factors V, VII, VIII, IX, and XIII, von Willebrand factor, high-molecular-weight kininogen, and prekallikrein levels.3 Increased plasma fibrinogen may contribute to increased thrombosis by being a direct substrate for the clot, by increasing the viscosity of blood or by enhancing platelet connection.4 On the contrary, increased fibrinogen levels may be a marker of intensified inflammation5; for example, fibrinogen increases in response to interleukin 6 (IL-6), which itself is strongly linked with age.6

In addition to the earlier, increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) have been implicated in endothelial dysfunction and vascular aging. Bonfigli et al showed that the presence of a 4G/5G polymorphism in the promoter region of the PAI-1 gene is associated with increased plasma levels with age.7 Elevated levels of PAI-1 and its procoagulant activity have been recognized as hallmarks of endothelial dysfunction.7,8 The structural and vascular wall changes during aging involve the extracellular matrix (ECM), vascular smooth muscle, and endothelium. These alterations contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis in older individuals.9 Furthermore, the age-dependent decrease of nitric oxide production may contribute to enhanced platelet activation and arterial thrombosis as well as to increased atherosclerosis.10,11

Aging is also an important risk factor for immune system impairment. Aging of the immune system, referred to as immunosenescence, is associated with functional dysregulation and a reduction in immune responsiveness. This decline in immune function with advancing age contributes to the increased incidence among the elderly in morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, cancer, and autoimmunity.12,13 Specifically, there are changes in T-cell subpopulations, B-cell function, and cytokine production, and function in older people. The data are inconsistent with regard to B-cell number. One study demonstrated that the number of B cells is unaffected in older adults,14 while others described a decline in total B cells, but only in men.1517 Ginaldi et al also demonstrated diminished B-cell immunity and decreased capacity to produce antibodies against known or new antigens in the elderly.18 As immune competence depends on rapid expansion of clonal B- and T-cell populations, telomere loss may contribute to defective immune responses in the elderly. Accelerated T-cell aging together with telomeric shortening may predispose to diminished autoimmune responses.19 There has also been evidence that telomere shortening might present a common biomarker for aging, immunosenescence, and autoimmune disease.20 Taken together, in older persons who carry a complement of predisposing genes, environmental factors may alter a senescent immune system and trigger the onset of autoimmunity. In the next sections, we will discuss how autoimmune disorders predispose to hypercoagulability in both the older people and the young, with MPs as a possible link to vascular aging and risk.

Characteristics of Blood-Derived Microparticles

Microparticles (MPs) are small (0.1–1.0 µm) membrane-bound vesicles with important physiologic effects. They are biological effectors in inflammation, angiogenesis, endothelial injury, and thrombosis.8,2123 Moreover, exposed procoagulant phospholipids and specific receptors at the surface of MPs act as biomessengers linking these processes.2426 Blood includes MPs derived from different cell types, mainly platelets, but also red blood cells, granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, and ECs. MPs may be released during cell activation, cell injury, cell senescence, and apoptosis. Of note, MPs can be characterized by the detection of the different cell surface antigens reflecting their origin and activation method.8

Platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs) are the most abundant MPs in the bloodstream comprising around 70 to 90% of circulating MPs.2729 A population of PMPs is generated during platelet activation, whereas other PMP populations are derived from megakaryocytes during megakaryopoiesis, from platelet apoptosis, or from quiescent circulating platelets.29,30 Although the physiologic mechanism(s) by which baseline MP levels are sustained in healthy persons remain unclear, it is known that platelet activation in thrombotic and inflammatory states leads to increased MP formation.29 High PMP levels combined with high D-dimer and P-selectin levels correlate with the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).31 Although a role for PMPs in promoting coagulation in cardiovascular (CV) disease has been described,23,32 some species of PMP may actually inhibit coagulation by accelerating inactivation of factor Va.33 Studies published by Knijff-Dutmer et al recently implicated PMPs in autoimmune disease.34 The authors demonstrated elevated levels of PMPs in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Increased levels of circulating PMPs have also been identified in patients with SLE and were associated with high thrombin, suggesting activation of the coagulation system.35,36

Leukocyte-derived microparticles may originate from neutrophils, monocyte/macrophages, B or T lymphocytes.37 Neutrophils (40–75% in circulating blood) migrate from the blood to sites of tissue inflammation in response to different chemotactic signals, promoting inflammation. When activated, neutrophils degranulate by exocytosis and release MPs from the cell surface by ectocytosis.3840 Neutrophil-derived microparticles (NMPs) expose phosphatidylserine,41 activate the classic pathway of complement, and fix C4 and C3 fragments. Moreover, NMPs act as inflammatory mediators in activating ECs.42,43 On the contrary, they also employ anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages44 and, when carrying annexin A1, inhibit the interaction between neutrophils and ECs.45,46 NMPs may also interact with resting platelets, which leads to platelet activation, increased P-selectin expression, and propagation of thrombus formation.47

Monocytes represent 2 to 8% of blood leukocytes. Monocyte-derived microparticles (MonoMPs) display tissue factor (TF), activated protein C, and thrombomodulin anticoagulant activity at their surface.48 After exposure to endotoxin, there is an early increase in MonoMPs associated TF procoagulant activity. MonoMPs can also interact with neutrophils, transferring their procoagulant activity and can additionally increase endothelial thrombogenicity.49,50

Lymphocytes represent 25 to 40% of blood leukocytes. B lymphocyte–derived MPs, T lymphocyte–derived MPs, and MonoMPs are elevated in the circulation of patients with autoimmune disease.51

Red blood cell (RBC) MPs represent a minority of total (RBC) MPs in plasma (4–8%).52 The formation of these erythrocyte-derived microparticles is also induced during the storage of blood.53 Rubin et al demonstrated that EMPs increase the risk of a hypercoagulable state54 and thus, may contribute to posttransfusion complications. Red cell antibody development is an additional complication of chronic transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease, for example.55,56 The level of RBC MPs in the blood of these patients is significantly elevated and correlates with the degree of intravascular hemolysis and premature aging of red blood cells.5759 Interestingly, after a blood transfusion, RBC MPs have strong anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the release of cytokines such as TNFα, IL-8, and IL-10.60,61

Microparticles in Thrombosis and Immunity

MPs are markers of cellular activation or of damage in the vascular compartment. In this compartment, MPs are major bioactive effectors of inflammation, vascular tone, angiogenesis, and thrombosis.62 The procoagulant properties of MPs involve phosphatidylserine, a procoagulant aminophospholipid needed for the assembly of blood clotting enzyme complexes, and TF, which when present is a major initiator of the coagulation cascade.22 Endothelial MPs express phospholipids that bind coagulation factors leading to a prothrombotic state.63 They also increase the procoagulant activity of TF, which is expressed in atherosclerotic plaques, macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and ECM. Recently, it was shown that endothelial MPs expressing both activators and inhibitors of coagulation have fibrinolytic properties that counteract their procoagulant activities, which may enable them to also contribute to hemostatic balance.64 A recent clinical study done by Forest et al65 revealed a reduced basal level of circulating endothelial MPs but preserved MP procoagulant activity in elderly patients compared with young patients.

MPs represent a source of immunologically active molecules that can influence cells and affect various processes such as inflammation, coagulation, antigen presentation, and apoptosis. Specifically, MPs may contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and inflammatory disorders as will be discussed in the next section. Depending on the source of the MPs, the cell type, and the local microenvironment, MPs can stimulate inflammation by various mechanisms: activation of the complement cascade, transfer of cell surface receptors, augmentation of leukocyte rolling, and cytokine stimulation.21 In contrast, under different conditions, MPs may exert anti-inflammatory effects by the induction of apoptosis in B and T cells via Fas–FasL interaction.66 Although multiple studies have demonstrated increased levels of MPs in patients with autoimmune diseases, more work is needed to understand the complex interplay of MPs with immune cells and their effectors.

Microparticles and Autoimmunity

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by joint pain, swelling, and deformity. Inflammation in RA contributes to accelerated atherosclerosis with increased mortality; in fact, CV disease is the most frequent cause of death in RA patients.67,68 MPs are a target of investigation in RA as they can transfer molecules to target cells, which then amplify a variety of biological mechanisms such as inflammation, apoptosis, and cell proliferation, impacting immune responses.69 Most studies have shown that RA patients, even in early stages of disease, have increased levels of MPs compared with healthy controls. Patients with active RA tended to have higher PMPs than nonactive RA patients.34,70 In contrast, Pamuket al observed similar or lower PMPs in RA patients versus healthy controls, and speculated that PMPs were expressed for a short period in peripheral blood before being removed from circulation.68 Of note, MP numbers, particularly PMPs, are similar between RA and other autoimmune diseases.34,69,70

RA-associated MPs have been isolated from both synovial fluid and peripheral blood. Generally, MP numbers are higher in synovial fluid than peripheral blood.71 Synovial fluid from RA patients and controls contain MPs originating from many cell types: granulocytes, monocytes, T cells, B cells, erythrocytes, and platelets,72,73 and appears to stimulate joint inflammation in multiple ways. For example, collagen-stimulated PMPs can stimulate production of IL-6 and IL-8 in fibroblast-like synoviocytes, contributing to joint inflammation.72 MPs released from platelets activated by collagen receptor glycoprotein VI appear to be important in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis. Synovial fluid MPs have much higher levels of bound C1q, C3, and C4 compared with plasma MPs from either RA patients or healthy controls.71 In addition, granulocyte MPs are implicated in local hypercoagulation through thrombin generation via factor VII. As thrombin can induce an inflammatory response, granulocyte MPs may indirectly stimulate inflammation by this mechanism.73

RA patients have a higher proportion of first-time CV events compared with control populations.7477 They suffer higher than anticipated myocardial infarctions (MIs) and these incidents are equal between males and females.74 Although we do not yet have data on MP association with MIs, there is an association between high levels of plasma MPs and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).78 In western countries, RA patients have a twofold increase in VTE incidents compared with controls, and a similar study in Taiwanese RA patients demonstrated a threefold and twofold increase in DVT and pulmonary embolism, respectively.7981 Patients with significantly elevated MP levels (greater than the 90th percentile) exhibited a fivefold increase in VTEs compared with patients with low MP levels (below the 10th percentile).78 As RA patients have higher levels of MPs compared with healthy controls, this may contribute to increased incidence of VTE in this population, although a causal relationship has not yet been established.82 The high levels of MPs, both in peripheral blood and synovial fluid, indicate that RA patients could be in a more prothrombotic state compared with healthy controls, leaving them more susceptible to VTE events. MPs are one possible link between inflammation and hypercoagulability, and more work is needed to define the role of MPs in thromboembolic events.

Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a relatively rare connective tissue disease most commonly affecting skin, lung, and kidney. The disease is characterized by autoantibody production, activation of immune cells, and subsequent tissue fibrosis, and vasculopathy. While the exact pathogenesis is unclear, EC dysfunction and damage are clearly involved and appear to play an early role in disease. The role of MPs in endothelial damage and inflammation in SSc patients has not been well studied, but several reports have revealed that MPs are altered in SSc. It is not yet clear whether they are surrogate markers of disease damage or mediating important biological processes such as inflammation and thrombosis. The data at this time suggest that MPs may play a role in pathogenesis. In a recent study of 121 SSc patients and 49 healthy controls, MPs were characterized, and levels were overall reduced approximately 20 to 40% in SSc patients.83 However, nonbinding MPs (AnxV-) were increased in SSc patients, and correlated with elevated plasma levels of sE- and sP-selectin (in diffuse SSc), suggesting an increased level of vascular activation in this group. A separate study found that plasma MP levels in SSc are overall increased and, additionally, levels correlated with skin fibrosis. Guiducci et al studied 37 SSc patients and 15 healthy controls and found the total number of MPs (from different cellular sources) was increased twofold over healthy controls.84 Given that vascular and thrombotic diseases are associated with increased MPs, the investigators excluded patients with a known history of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke, and/or thrombotic diseases such as APS. Not surprisingly, they did detect an increase in arterial hypertension in the SSc patients versus controls.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a well-known complication of both limited and diffuse SSc. PAH is associated with activated platelets, an inflammatory vasculopathy and EC dysfunction that lead to increased risk of thromboembolism. PAH patients also have an approximate twofold increase in MP in agreement with the study by Guiducci et al.85 Further classifying the MPs revealed that PAH patients with thromboembolic disease had higher levels of endothelial-derived MPs compared with nonembolic PAH patients, suggesting an association between MPs and risk of increased disease-related coagulopathy, as well as possible PAH progression.

With regard to potential mechanisms of MP impact on vascular injury in SSc, two recent studies have proposed a role for MP-produced high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) as a regulator of crosstalk between platelets and leukocytes leading to increase in the inflammatory vasculopathy in SSc patients. Maugeri et al found that HMGB1(+) MPs isolated from SSc patients, but not HMGB1(−) MPs from controls, activated neutrophils, suggesting that these MPs participate in microvascular injury and inflammation via HMGB1 activity in SSc which may contribute to the prothrombotic atmosphere in these patients.86

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous, multiorgan involvement with a strong female predominance. The pathogenesis of SLE is characterized by autoantibody production, specifically antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) that then form immune complexes. Immune complexes stimulate cytokine production, notably a type 1 interferon response, and deposit in the kidneys and other organs causing cellular injury. Current research has implicated MPs as a source of autoantigenic nuclear material that then can form immune complexes.87 MPs are released via a blebbing process during cellular death or activation and can contain DNA, RNA, growth factors, and cytokines. MPs can transfer these biologically active molecules, influencing inflammation, and coagulation, as stated earlier. As MPs can contain nucleic acid material, they can inappropriately activate the innate immune system and potentially lead to autoimmunity.67 It is hypothesized that the autoantigenic material in MPs is increased in SLE patients due to both an increase in cell death and an impaired ability to clear apoptotic debris.87

MPs have been studied in lupus prone murine models to determine if they can form immune complexes. Specifically, one study showed that plasma from MRL/lpr lupus prone mice contains MPs that bear immunoglobulin G (IgG).88 Using another murine model C3H/lpr, MPs were found in the plasma along with significant levels of IgG, implicating MPs in the formation of immune complexes, likely with ANA.67,89 Human studies demonstrated that MPs derived from apoptotic cells in vitro could bind to SLE patient plasma to form immune complexes.87 In a follow-up study, investigators found im complexes composed of MPs bound to IgG in SLE plasma. MP levels from SLE patient plasma were greater than control plasma, and also had higher levels of anti-IgG binding and IgG-positive MPs. Furthermore, the number of IgG-positive MPs was positively correlated with anti-DNA antibodies.87 Another group investigated MPs as a source of immune complexes in SLE plasma and found that a specific MP subpopulation correlated with SLE disease activity scores.90 They also found increased levels of IgG, IgM, and C1q bound to cell-derived MPs in SLE patient plasma compared with healthy controls. Levels of IgG-positive MPs correlated with the presence of anti-dsDNA,36 all suggesting a role for MPs in immune complex formation. SLE patients have a unique profile of increased MPs containing Ig and complement proteins compared with patients with RA and SSc or healthy controls. Systematic profiling of the protein composition of MPs revealed increased representation of immunoglobulin and complement of the classical pathway in SLE patients. This highlights that MPs may play a role in activating Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 and -9, stimulating the release of IFNα from plasmacytoid dendritic cells91 key events in lupus pathogenesis. Thus, both murine and human studies suggest that MPs play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE and better understanding this role may help identify new targets for treatment.

In addition to autoantibody-mediated immune complex formation and organ damage, patients with SLE have an increased risk of CV disease that is not fully explained by traditional risk factors such as age and hypertension.9294 SLE is considered an independent risk factor for CV disease. The increased risk is likely due to an interplay between inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, but hypercoagulability may also contribute.95 Endothelial microparticles (EMPs) have been implicated as a potential biomarker for endothelial damage in SLE. EMPs play a role in intracellular signaling and allow transfer of proteins such as vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelial nitric oxide synthase.96,97 One study investigated whether active SLE was associated with increased levels of EMPs and endothelial dysfunction, as measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD).95 Patients with active SLE had significantly higher levels of both total MPs and EMPs as well as impaired FMD, compared with controls. There was a moderate correlation between number of EMPs and FMD. Furthermore, when active SLE patients were treated with more aggressive immunosuppressive therapy resulting in decreased disease activity, both total MPs and EMPs significantly declined and were comparable to controls. This study showed that EMP levels could be potential biomarkers for endothelial dysfunction in SLE with needed studies to establish the role of EMPs in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfunction. This study additionally suggests that suppressing inflammation and reducing disease activity in SLE decreases EMP levels and may have a beneficial effect on endothelial function leading to reduced vascular risk factors.

Summary and Conclusion

Increased level of MPs is observed in vascular as well as immune and autoimmune disorders (►Table 1). The immune and coagulation systems are tightly linked suggesting the role of MPs in this connection. However, the direct association between elevated levels of MP generation and formation of immune and coagulation systems are tightly linked suggesting the role of MPs in this connection. However, this interplay is understudied and further investigation of cellular and molecular mechanisms of these correlations is needed. These findings can be crucial in understanding and providing a basis to identify new targets for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Table 1.

Summary of origin and characteristic of MPs in RA, SSc, and SLE

Autoimmune
diseases
Blood- and cell-derived MP References
RA ↑ PMPs in synovial fluid, peripheral blood 34,70,82
↓ PMPs in peripheral blood 68
↑ MonoMPs 72,73
↑ LMPs 72,73
SSc ↓ PMPs, ↓ EMPs 83
↑ LMPs, ↑ PMPs 84,86
SLE ↑ MPs in peripheral blood 87
↑ EMPs 9597

Abbreviations: EMPs, endothelial-derived microparticles; LMPs, leukocyte-derived microparticles; MPs, microparticles; PMPs, platelet-derived microparticles; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Acknowledgment

This work was conducted in a facility constructed with support from the National Institutes of Health (NIA), Grant Number K01AG031909 (MM) from Extramural Research Facilities Program of the National Center for Research.

References

  • 1.Zöller B, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Autoimmune diseases and venous thromboembolism: a review of the literature. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;2(3):171–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosendaal FR. Thrombosis in the young: epidemiology and risk factors. A focus on venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78(1):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Favaloro EJ, Franchini M, Lippi G. Aging hemostasis: changes to laboratory markers of hemostasis as we age—a narrative review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tracy RP, Bovill EG. Thrombosis and cardiovascular risk in the elderly. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;16:1307–1312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Bull C, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24(6):1468–1474. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ershler WB. Interleukin-6: a cytokine for gerontologists. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41(2):176–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb02054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bonfigli AR, Sirolla C, Cenerelli S, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 plasma level increases with age in subjects with the 4G allele at position −675 in the promoter region. Thromb Haemost. 2004;92(5):1164–1165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Markiewicz M, Richard E, Marks N, Ludwicka-Bradley A. Impact of endothelial microparticles on coagulation, inflammation, and angiogenesis in age-related vascular diseases. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:734509. doi: 10.1155/2013/734509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brandes RP, Fleming I, Busse R. Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66(2):286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide insufficiency, platelet activation, and arterial thrombosis. Circ Res. 2001;88(8):756–762. doi: 10.1161/hh0801.089861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garg UC, Hassid A. Nitric oxide-generating vasodilators and 8-bromo-cyclic guanosine monophosphate inhibit mitogenesis and proliferation of cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83(5):1774–1777. doi: 10.1172/JCI114081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Linton P, Thoman ML. T cell senescence. Front Bio sci. 2001;6:D248–D261. doi: 10.2741/linton. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Prelog M. Aging of the immune system: a risk factor for autoimmunity? Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5(2):136–139. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Antonaci S, Jirillo E, Bonomo L. Immunoregulation in aging. Diagn Clin Immunol. 1987;5(2):55–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kendall MD, Johnson HR, Singh J. The weight of the human thymus gland at necropsy. J Anat. 1980;131(Pt 3):483–497. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Subbarao B, Morris J, Kryscio RJ. Phenotypic and functional properties of B lymphocytes from aged mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 1990;51(3):223–241. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(90)90073-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Utsuyama M, Hirokawa K, Kurashima C, et al. Differential age-change in the numbers of CD4+CD45RA+ and CD4+CD29+ T cell subsets in human peripheral blood. Mech Ageing Dev. 1992;63(1):57–68. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(92)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ginaldi L, DeMartinis M, D’Ostilio A, Marini L, Loreto MF, Quaglino D. Immunological changes in the elderly. Aging (Milano) 1999;11(5):281–286. doi: 10.1007/BF03339801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goronzy JJ, Fujii H, Weyand CM. Telomeres, immune aging and autoimmunity. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41(3):246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Costenbader KH, Prescott J, Zee RY, De Vivo I. Immunosenescence and rheumatoid arthritis: does telomere shortening predict impending disease? Autoimmun Rev. 2011;10(9):569–573. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Distler JH, Huber LC, Gay S, Distler O, Pisetsky DS. Microparticles as mediators of cellular cross-talk in inflammatory disease. Autoimmunity. 2006;39(8):683–690. doi: 10.1080/08916930601061538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roos MA, Gennero L, Denysenko T, et al. Microparticles in physiological and in pathological conditions. Cell Biochem Funct. 2010;28(7):539–548. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Puddu P, Puddu GM, Cravero E, Muscari S, Muscari A. The involvement of circulating microparticles in inflammation, coagulation and cardiovascular diseases. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26(4):140–145. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70371-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Burger D, Montezano AC, Nishigaki N, He Y, Carter A, Touyz RM. Endothelial microparticle formation by angiotensin II is mediated via Ang II receptor type I/NADPH oxidase/ Rho kinase pathways targeted to lipid rafts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(8):1898–1907. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.222703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leroyer AS, Anfosso F, Lacroix R, et al. Endothelial-derived microparticles: Biological conveyors at the crossroad of inflammation, thrombosis and angiogenesis. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(3):456–463. doi: 10.1160/TH10-02-0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Owens AP, III, Mackman N. Microparticles in hemostasis and thrombosis. Circ Res. 2011;108(10):1284–1297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Burnier L, Fontana P, Kwak BR, Angelillo-Scherrer A. Cell-derived microparticles in haemostasis and vascular medicine. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(3):439–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Horstman LL, Ahn YS. Platelet microparticles: a wide-angle perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999;30(2):111–142. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(98)00044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Flaumenhaft R, Dilks JR, Richardson J, et al. Megakaryocyte-derived microparticles: direct visualization and distinction from platelet-derived microparticles. Blood. 2009;113(5):1112–1121. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-163832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rozmyslowicz T, Majka M, Kijowski J, et al. Platelet- and megakaryocyte-derived microparticles transfer CXCR4 receptor to CXCR4-null cells and make them susceptible to infection by X4-HIV. AIDS. 2003;17(1):33–42. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200301030-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chirinos JA, Heresi GA, Velasquez H, et al. Elevation of endothelial microparticles, platelets, and leukocyte activation in patients with venous thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(9):1467–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Preston RA, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, et al. Effects of severe hypertension on endothelial and platelet microparticles. Hypertension. 2003;41(2):211–217. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000049760.15764.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tans G, Rosing J, Thomassen MC, Heeb MJ, Zwaal RF, Griffin JH. Comparison of anticoagulant and procoagulant activities of stimulated platelets and platelet-derived microparticles. Blood. 1991;77(12):2641–2648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Knijff-Dutmer EA, Koerts J, Nieuwland R, Kalsbeek-Batenburg EM, van de Laar MA. Elevated levels of platelet microparticles are associated with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(6):1498–1503. doi: 10.1002/art.10312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pereira J, Alfaro G, Goycoolea M, et al. Circulating platelet-derived microparticles in systemic lupus erythematosus. Association with increased thrombin generation and procoagulant state. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(1):94–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nielsen CT, Østergaard O, Stener L, et al. Increased IgG on cell-derived plasma microparticles in systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with autoantibodies and complement activation. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(4):1227–1236. doi: 10.1002/art.34381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Angelillo-Scherrer A. Leukocyte-derived microparticles in vascular homeostasis. Circ Res. 2012;110(2):356–369. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lacy P. Mechanisms of degranulation in neutrophils. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2006;2(3):98–108. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-2-3-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gasser O, Hess C, Miot S, Deon C, Sanchez JC, Schifferli JA. Characterisation and properties of ectosomes released by human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Exp Cell Res. 2003;285(2):243–257. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(03)00055-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hess C, Sadallah S, Hefti A, Landmann R, Schifferli JA. Ectosomes released by human neutrophils are specialized functional units. J Immunol. 1999;163(8):4564–4573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gasser O, Schifferli JA. Microparticles released by human neutrophils adhere to erythrocytes in the presence of complement. Exp Cell Res. 2005;307(2):381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mesri M, Altieri DC. Endothelial cell activation by leukocyte microparticles. J Immunol. 1998;161(8):4382–4387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mesri M, Altieri DC. Leukocyte microparticles stimulate endothelial cell cytokine release and tissue factor induction in a JNK1 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(33):23111–23118. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gasser O, Schifferli JA. Activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils disseminate anti-inflammatory microparticles by ectocytosis. Blood. 2004;104(8):2543–2548. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(5):H1910–H1915. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01172.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dalli J, Norling LV, Renshaw D, Cooper D, Leung KY, Perretti M. Annexin 1 mediates the rapid anti-inflammatory effects of neutrophil-derived microparticles. Blood. 2008;112(6):2512–2519. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-140533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pluskota E, Woody NM, Szpak D, et al. Expression, activation, and function of integrin alphaMbeta2 (Mac-1) on neutrophil-derived microparticles. Blood. 2008;112(6):2327–2335. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-127183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Satta N, Freyssinet JM, Toti F. The significance of human monocyte thrombomodulin during membrane vesiculation and after stimulation by lipopolysaccharide. Br J Haematol. 1997;96(3):534–542. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Aharon A, Tamari T, Brenner B. Monocyte-derived microparticles and exosomes induce procoagulant and apoptotic effects on endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 2008;100(5):878–885. doi: 10.1160/th07-11-0691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Egorina EM, Sovershaev MA, Olsen JO, Østerud B. Granulocytes do not express but acquire monocyte-derived tissue factor in whole blood: evidence for a direct transfer. Blood. 2008;111(3):1208–1216. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-107698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baka Z, Senolt L, Vencovsky J, et al. Increased serum concentration of immune cell derived microparticles in polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Immunol Lett. 2010;128(2):124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shah MD, Bergeron AL, Dong JF, López JA. Flow cytometric measurement of microparticles: pitfalls and protocol modifications. Platelets. 2008;19(5):365–372. doi: 10.1080/09537100802054107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Canellini G, Rubin O, Delobel J, Crettaz D, Lion N, Tissot JD. Red blood cell microparticles and blood group antigens: an analysis by flow cytometry. Blood Transfus. 2012;10(Suppl 2):s39–s45. doi: 10.2450/2012.007S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rubin O, Canellini G, Delobel J, Lion N, Tissot JD. Red blood cell microparticles: clinical relevance. Transfus Med Hemother. 2012;39(5):342–347. doi: 10.1159/000342228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rosse WF, Gallagher D, Kinney TR, et al. The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Transfusion and alloimmunization in sickle cell disease. Blood. 1990;76(7):1431–1437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cox JV, Steane E, Cunningham G, Frenkel EP. Risk of alloimmunization and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions in patients with sickle cell disease. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(11):2485–2489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bosman GJ. Erythrocyte aging in sickle cell disease. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2004;50(1):81–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Westerman M, Pizzey A, Hirschman J, et al. Microvesicles in haemoglobinopathies offer insights into mechanisms of hypercoagulability, haemolysis and the effects of therapy. Br J Haematol. 2008;142(1):126–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.van Beers EJ, Schaap MC, Berckmans RJ, et al. CURAMA study group. Circulating erythrocyte-derived microparticles are associated with coagulation activation in sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 2009;94(11):1513–1519. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.008938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sadallah S, Eken C, Schifferli JA. Erythrocyte-derived ectosomes have immunosuppressive properties. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;84(5):1316–1325. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0108013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sadallah S, Eken C, Schifferli JA. Ectosomes as modulators of inflammation and immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;163(1):26–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04271.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Morel O, Toti F, Freyssinet JM. Markers of thrombotic disease: procoagulant microparticles [in French] Ann Pharm Fr. 2007;65(2):75–84. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4509(07)90020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ueba T, Haze T, Sugiyama M, et al. Level, distribution and correlates of platelet-derived microparticles in healthy individuals with special reference to the metabolic syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2008;100(2):280–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lacroix R, Dignat-George F. Microparticles as a circulating source of procoagulant and fibrinolytic activities in the circulation. Thromb Res. 2012;129(Suppl 2):S27–S29. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Forest A, Pautas E, Ray P, et al. Circulating microparticles and procoagulant activity in elderly patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65:414–420. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jodo S, Xiao S, Hohlbaum A, Strehlow D, Marshak-Rothstein A, Ju ST. Apoptosis-inducing membrane vesicles. A novel agent with unique properties. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(43):39938–39944. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dye JR, Ullal AJ, Pisetsky DS. The role of microparticles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Immunol. 2013;78(2):140–148. doi: 10.1111/sji.12068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pamuk GE, Vural O, Turgut B, Demir M, Pamuk ON, Cakir N. Increased platelet activation markers in rheumatoid arthritis: are they related with subclinical atherosclerosis? Platelets. 2008;19(2):146–154. doi: 10.1080/09537100701210057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sellam J, Proulle V, Jüngel A, et al. Increased levels of circulating microparticles in primary Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis and relation with disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R156. doi: 10.1186/ar2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.van Eijk IC, Tushuizen ME, Sturk A, et al. Circulating microparticles remain associated with complement activation despite intensive anti-inflammatory therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(7):1378–1382. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.118372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Biró E, Nieuwland R, Tak PP, et al. Activated complement components and complement activator molecules on the surface of cell-derived microparticles in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy individuals. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(8):1085–1092. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.061309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boilard E, Nigrovic PA, Larabee K, et al. Platelets amplify inflammation in arthritis via collagen-dependent microparticle production. Science. 2010;327(5965):580–583. doi: 10.1126/science.1181928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Berckmans RJ, Nieuwland R, Böing AN, Romijn FP, Hack CE, Sturk A. Cell-derived microparticles circulate in healthy humans and support low grade thrombin generation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(4):639–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Turesson C, Jarenros A, Jacobsson L. Increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a community based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(8):952–955. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Maradit-Kremers H, Crowson CS, Nicola PJ, et al. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(2):402–411. doi: 10.1002/art.20853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Maradit-Kremers H, Nicola PJ, Crowson CS, Ballman KV, Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular death in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(3):722–732. doi: 10.1002/art.20878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Solomon DH, Goodson NJ, Katz JN, et al. Patterns of cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(12):1608–1612. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.050377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bucciarelli P, Martinelli I, Artoni A, et al. Circulating microparticles and risk of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2012;129(5):591–597. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Holmqvist ME, Neovius M, Eriksson J, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and association with disease duration and hospitalization. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1350–1356. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Choi HK, Rho YH, Zhu Y, Cea-Soriano L, Aviña-Zubieta JA, Zhang Y. The risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a UK population-based outpatient cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1182–1187. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chung WS, Peng CL, Lin CL, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Beyer C, Pisetsky DS. The role of microparticles in the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(1):21–29. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Iversen LV, Østergaard O, Ullman S, et al. Circulating microparticles and plasma levels of soluble E- and P-selectins in patients with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2013;42(6):473–482. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2013.796403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Guiducci S, Distler JH, Jüngel A, et al. The relationship between plasma microparticles and disease manifestations in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(9):2845–2853. doi: 10.1002/art.23735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Diehl P, Aleker M, Helbing T, et al. Increased platelet, leukocyte and endothelial microparticles predict enhanced coagulation and vascular inflammation in pulmonary hypertension. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011;31(2):173–179. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0507-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Maugeri N, Rovere-Querini P, Baldini M, et al. Oxidative stress elicits platelet/leukocyte inflammatory interactions via HMGB1: a candidate for microvessel injury in sytemic sclerosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20(7):1060–1074. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ullal AJ, Reich CF, III, Clowse M, et al. Microparticles as antigenic targets of antibodies to DNA and nucleosomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2011;36(3–4):173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ullal AJ, Pisetsky DS. The role of microparticles in the generation of immune complexes in murine lupus. Clin Immunol. 2013;146(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wloch MK, Alexander AL, Pippen AM, Pisetsky DS, Gilkeson GS. Differences in V kappa gene utilization and VH CDR3 sequence among anti-DNA from C3H-lpr mice and lupus mice with nephritis. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26(9):2225–2233. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nielsen CT, Østergaard O, Johnsen C, Jacobsen S, Heegaard NH. Distinct features of circulating microparticles and their relationship to clinical manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10):3067–3077. doi: 10.1002/art.30499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Østergaard O, Nielsen CT, Iversen LV, et al. Unique protein signature of circulating microparticles in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(10):2680–2690. doi: 10.1002/art.38065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, et al. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(5):408–415. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bruce IN, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Steiner G. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Toronto Risk Factor Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(11):3159–3167. doi: 10.1002/art.11296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Grodzicky T, et al. Traditional Framingham risk factors fail to fully account for accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(10):2331–2337. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200110)44:10<2331::aid-art395>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Parker B, Al-Husain A, Pemberton P, et al. Suppression of inflammation reduces endothelial microparticles in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chironi GN, Boulanger CM, Simon A, Dignat-George F, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. Endothelial microparticles in diseases. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;335(1):143–151. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0710-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mayr M, Grainger D, Mayr U, et al. Proteomics, metabolomics, and immunomics on microparticles derived from human atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2(4):379–388. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.842849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES