Skip to main content
Protein & Cell logoLink to Protein & Cell
. 2015 Jun 17;6(9):698–701. doi: 10.1007/s13238-015-0166-0

Analysis of phosphorylation sites on autophagy proteins

Wenzhi Feng 1,5, Wenhao Zhang 2, Hui Wang 3, Lili Ma 4, Di Miao 2, Zexian Liu 4, Yu Xue 4, Haiteng Deng 2,, Li Yu 5,
PMCID: PMC4537473  PMID: 26081468

Dear Editor,

Autophagy is a lysosome-based degradation pathway, characterized by formation of a double-membrane vesicle named the autophagosome. During autophagy, various cargos are engulfed and delivered to lysosomes (or the vacuole in yeast) for degradation. It is an evolutionarily conserved pathway and plays important roles in various physiological and pathological conditions such as development, immunity, cancer and neuronal degeneration (Jiang and Mizushima, 2014; Martin et al., 2014).

Autophagosome formation is regulated by a set of autophagy-related (Atg) proteins. Phosphorylation plays an important role in the regulation of autophagy (McEwan and Dikic, 2011). Some Atg proteins, such as Atg1, Atg13, Atg29 and Atg31, have been reported to be phosphorylated (Kamada et al., 2000; Yeh et al., 2011; Mao et al., 2013), but so far there has been no systematic study of the phosphorylation of key autophagy proteins.

To analyze the phosphorylation sites of key autophagy proteins, we first purified Atg proteins, including Atg1, Atg3, Atg4, Atg6, Atg8, Atg15, Atg16, Atg17, Atg18, Atg27, Atg29 and Atg31, from yeast that had been grown in nutrient-rich conditions or starved for 1 h to induce autophagy. Proteins were digested with sequencing-grade trypsin and extracted from the gel. Peptides were subjected to several repeated rounds of tandem LC-MS/MS analysis in the data-dependent acquisition mode. The Mascot search engine was then used to compare the MS data against the Saccharomyces cerevisiae database using the Proteome Discoverer (Version 1.4) search algorithm. Each search result had no close second ranking protein contaminant. The corresponding MS/MS spectra for each of the tentatively assigned phosphorylation sites were manually verified and annotated for the sequence-informative b and y fragment ions. We also manually verified the intensity of each phospho-peptide and compared the phosphorylation ratio between cells in nutrient-rich medium and starvation medium. Through this process, we identified that many Atg proteins, including Atg1, Atg3, Atg4, Atg6, Atg15, Atg16, Atg18, Atg27, Atg29 and Atg31, are phosphorylated. More than 60 sites were identified on these proteins purified from both fed and starved cells (Tables 1 and S3).

Table 1.

Phosphorylation sites identified on yeast Atg proteins and mutagenesis screen

Sites Au L Sites Au L Sites Au L Sites Au L
Atg1
T226
+++ Atg1
S769
++− Atg16
S50
+++ Atg29
T33
+++
Atg1
Y332
+++ Atg1
S783
++− Atg18
S41, T56, S57
++− Atg29
S43
+++
Atg1
S343
+++ Atg3
Y168, Y169
+++ Atg18
S140, S142, S146
++− Atg29
S127
+++
Atg1
S351
+++ Atg3
Y172
+++ Atg18
S173
+++ Atg29
S187
+++
Atg1
S356
+++ Atg3
T177
+++ Atg18
S192, S195
++− Atg31
S38, S40, T41, S44
+++
Atg1
S436
+++ Atg3
S230
+++ Atg18
S214
++− Atg31
S116
+++
Atg1
S515
+++ Atg4
T483, S488
+++ Atg18
T234
+++ Atg31
S135
+++
Atg1
T590
+++ Atg6
S32, T37
+++ Atg18
S349
++− Atg31
S143, S146
+++
Atg1
S621
++ Atg6
S231
+++ Atg18
T393
++− Atg31
S153
++−
Atg1
S677
++ Atg15
T22, T24
+++ Atg27
T93
+++ Atg31
S174
+
Atg1
T685
+++ Atg16
S17, T21, S23
+++ Atg27
T211
+++ Atg31
S153, S195
+++

The identified phosphorylation sites were mutated to A and the autophagy activity of the mutants was assessed by monitoring the translocation of GFP-Atg8 into vacuoles. 100 cells were assessed in a blind fashion and quantified. The autophagy level ratio (Au L) is the qualitative assessments of mutant autophagy activity compared to WT activity

Next, we mutated each individual phosphorylation site to alanine (A). We also generated some mutants in which combinations of different sites are mutated. We found that most single phosphorylation site mutations have no effect on autophagy, except a few sites on Atg1 which have been reported previously (Yeh et al., 2011), and one site on Atg31 (S174, Table 1).

We identified 11 phosphorylation sites on Atg31. There was no significant change in the phosphorylation level at those sites when autophagy was induced (Fig. 1A) (ratio of IR in starvation medium/full medium >2 or <0.5). So are the phosphorylation sites on Atg3, Atg4, Atg6, Atg15, Atg16, Atg27 and Atg29, except one site, T177 phosphorylation on Atg3, appeared in starved cells. For other Atg proteins we tested, starvation increased the phosphorylation level. For example, 13 phosphorylation sites were identified on Atg1: T226, Y332, S343, S351, S356, S436, S515, T590, S621, S677, T685, S769 and S783 (Fig. 1B). Of these, T226, Y332, S343, S351, S356, S436 and T685 were different from the Atg1 phosphorylation sites reported before (Yeh et al., 2011). Y332 and T685 were new sites that have never been identified in previous studies of yeast phospho-proteomics. Phosphorylation of S343, S515, S685 and S769 was only detected under starvation conditions, while phosphorylation of Y332, S351 and S677 was only detected in cells cultured in nutrient-rich medium. When we compared the relative levels of phosphorylated Atg1 peptides under nutrient-rich conditions and starvation conditions, we found that most of the sites identified from the mass spectrometry analysis, including T226, S343, S356, S515, S621, T685 and S769, were phosphorylated at significantly higher levels (ratio of IR in starvation medium/IR in full medium >2) when autophagy occurs (Fig. 1D). Similarly, we identified 13 phosphorylation sites on Atg18 including 10 (S41, T56, S57, S140, S142, S146, S192, S195, S214 and T234) that are phosphorylated in fed cells and 9 (S140, S142, S146, S173, S195, S214, T234, S349 and T393) that are phosphorylated after induction of autophagy (Fig. 1C). The level of T234 phosphorylation increased significantly when autophagy was induced and three new phosphorylated sites appeared (S173, S349 and T393; Fig. 1E).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phosphorylation status of Atg proteins under nutrient-rich and starvation conditions. (A–C) Schematic diagrams of the Atg31, Atg1 and Atg18 proteins showing the phosphorylation sites identified by MS. Blue, sites that are phosphorylated under both nutrient rich and starvation conditions; red, sites that are phosphorylated only under starvation conditions; black, sites that are phosphorylated only under nutrient-rich conditions. (D) MS1 intensity ratio (IR) of phosphorylated Atg1 peptides in nutrient-rich and starvation conditions. NA, no phospho-peptide detected. (E) MS1 intensity ratio (IR) of phosphorylated Atg18 peptides in nutrient-rich and starvation conditions. (F) Network of Atg proteins and the corresponding kinases predicted by iGPS

Finally, we predicted the kinase families responsible for phosphorylating the sites we identified (Xue et al., 2011) (Fig. 1F). We found that Atg1 can be phosphorylated by many important kinases: AMPK (Snf1), PKA (Tpk1/2/3), mitochondrial protein kinases (Pkp1/2), protein kinases involved in stress (Rck2, Sch9, Rim15 and Dbf2), protein kinases of the PAK/Ste20 family (Kic1, Cla4), kinases involved in transcription (Kns1, Sky1, Ssn3, Sgv1, Ctk1 and Pho85), kinases related to the cell integrity pathway (Ypk2, Cbk1), and others. Of these kinases, AMPK and PKA have previously been reported as mediating signals upstream of Atg1 (Stephan et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2011). The other predicted kinases suggest new signal pathways which may regulate Atg1 function or autophagy. Atg18 is predicted to be phosphorylated by the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) Hog1 and Slt2, yeast casein kinase homolog Yck1, and the vacuolar casein kinase I (CKI) Yck3. Yck3 is a palmitoylated vacuolar membrane-localized casein kinase I isoform that regulates vacuole fusion and fission. Hog1 is involved in osmoregulation. Atg4 is predicted to be phosphorylated by Ste11, Bck1 and Cdc15. Atg6 is predicted to be phosphorylated by Kic1, Cla4, Skm1, Dun1, Rad53, Sps1 and Ste20. Atg16 is predicted to be phosphorylated by Cbk1, Dbf2 and Rim15. The predicted kinases of Atg15 are Ypk2, Sch9 and Pkc1. And Atg31 is predicted to be phosphorylated by Ypk2 and Sch9.

In summary, we studied the phosphorylation of key Atg proteins and found that many of them were phosphorylated. Furthermore, we performed site-directed mutagenesis to check whether the phosphorylated sites have an effect on autophagy activity. Although most of the single mutations had no effect, we cannot exclude the possibility that different phosphorylation sites may combine together to play a role in autophagy. Finally, we predicted the kinases which may mediate phosphorylation of these Atg proteins. We hope our study provides useful information to researchers who study the regulation of autophagy.

Electronic supplementary material

FOOTNOTES

Wenzhi Feng, Wenhao Zhang, Hui Wang, Lili Ma, Di Miao, Zexian Liu, Yu Xue, Haiteng Deng and Li Yu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31125018, 31030043 and 31321003), and the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) (Nos. 2010CB833704 and 2011CB910100) to Li Yu.

Contributor Information

Haiteng Deng, Email: dengh@biomed.tsinghua.edu.cn.

Li Yu, Email: liyulab@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.

References

  1. Efe JA, Botelho RJ, Emr SD. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:4232–4244. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jiang P, Mizushima N. Cell Res. 2014;24:69–79. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaiser C, Michaelis S, Mitchell A. Methods in yeast genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, Nagano K, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:1507–1513. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:132–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Longtine MS, McKenzie III A, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. Yeast. 1998;14:8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::AID-YEA293>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mao K, Chew LH, Inoue-Aono Y, Cheong H, Nair U, Popelka H, Yip CK, Klionsky DJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:E2875–E2884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300064110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martin DDO, Ladha S, Ehrnhoefer DE, Hayden MR. Trends Neurosci. 2014;38:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McEwan DG, Dikic I. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephan JS, Yeh YY, Ramachandran V, Deminoff SJ, Herman PK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17049–17054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903316106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xue Y, Liu Z, Cao J, Ma Q, Gao X, Wang Q, Jin C, Zhou Y, Wen L, Ren J. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2011;24:255–260. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzq094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yeh Y-Y, Shah KH, Chou C-C, Hsiao H-H, Wrasman KM, Stephan JS, Stamatakos D, Khoo K-H, Herman PK. Autophagy. 2011;7:716–726. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.7.15155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Protein & Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES