Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2015 Jun 15;8(6):9599–9602.

Effect of interleukin-6 polymorphism on fracture risk

Chuangli Wang 1, Jianfei Ge 1, Shanjun Ni 1
PMCID: PMC4538156  PMID: 26309632

Abstract

Background: Interleukin-6 (IL6) -174C/G polymorphism was suggested to be associated with fracture risk. However, the results were inconsistent. Thus, we did a meta-analysis. Methods: Reported studies were searched from online electronic databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. Results: Six studies evaluated the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. A significant association was found between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43; P=0.0008). In the subgroup analysis of gender, we found that women with IL6 -174C/G polymorphism had an increased fracture risk (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.46; P=0.005). In the subgroup analysis of type of fracture, we found that IL6 -174C/G polymorphism was significantly associated with wrist fracture (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.47; P=0.006) and osteoporotic fracture (OR=1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.28; P=0.009). However, no significant association was found between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and hip fracture (OR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24; P=0.53) and stress fracture (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.61; P=0.08). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that the IL6 -174C/G polymorphism was associated with wrist and osteoporotic fracture risk.

Keywords: Fracture, interleukin-6, genetics

Introduction

Fracture, most prevalent in elderly women with low bone strength, was an important cause of increased mortality and morbidity [1]. The survivors of fracture often had impaired quality of life [2]. The costs of fracture in Europe were estimated to be about 36 billion Euros per year [3].

Inflammation played an important role in the development of fracture. Estrogen normally suppressed the production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) [4]. The decline in estrogen production after menopause lead to increased IL-6 production. Thus, increased IL-6 in the bone microenvironment lead to the differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells into mature osteoclasts, and increased bone resorption [5]. Additionally, Beeton et al. suggested that the serum level of IL-6 was significantly higher in patients with fracture compared with the control group [6]. Genetic factors also played critical roles in the pathomechanism of fracture [7]. Some previous studies reported the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk [8-13]. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, a meta-analysis of IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk was carried out.

Methods

Search studies

Reported studies were searched from online electronic databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (Last search was updated on October, 2014). The search terms were used as follows: (“interleukin-6” or IL6 or IL-6) and (“fracture” or “bone fracture” or “fracture, bone”) and (“polymorphism” or “genetic”). We also identified the reference lists of all retrieved articles and relevant reviews. No language restriction was used.

Inclusion criteria

The following criteria were used: (1) a case-control study or cohort study assessed the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk; (2) sufficient data were available for calculation odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Only studies meet these criteria at the same time would be included for analysis.

Data extraction

Data was extracted from the eligible studies by two authors independently. The following data were extracted: the first author, publication year, country, ethnicity, age, number of subjects. We contacted the authors if more data were needed.

Statistical analysis

The OR and corresponding 95% CI were calculated to assess the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk in dominant model. The heterogeneity was calculated by Chi square-based Q test and I2. If no significant heterogeneity was observed, fixed-effects model was used. However, if significant heterogeneity wasobserved, random-effects model was used. Subgroup analysis was done on gender and type of fracture. Publication bias was calculated by Begg’s test and funnel plot. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata software 11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Characteristics of studies

A total of six studies with 3285 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. All the eligible studies were performed from 2004 to 2012. Four studies used old populations and two studies used young populations. Three studies included postmenopausal women. The characteristics of the included studies were shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Author Year Country Ethnicity Age Female (%) Sample size
Nordstrom 2004 Sweden Caucasian 75±0 100 964
Moffett 2004 USA Caucasian 73±5 100 1546
Dinçel 2008 Turkey Caucasian 74±9 62 37
Breuil 2009 France Caucasian 70±7 100 161
Korvala 2010 Finland Caucasian 20±2 NA 192
Yanovich 2012 Israel Caucasian 20±2 NA 385

Meta-analysis results

Six studies evaluated the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. A significant association was found between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43; P=0.0008; Figure 1). Results of this meta-analysis are listed in Table 2. In the subgroup analysis of gender, we found that women with IL6 -174C/G polymorphism had an increased fracture risk (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.46; P=0.005). In the subgroup analysis of type of fracture, we found that IL6 -174C/G polymorphism was significantly associated with wrist fracture (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.47; P=0.006) and osteoporotic fracture (OR=1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.28; P=0.009). However, no significant association was found between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and hip fracture (OR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24; P=0.53) and stress fracture (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.61; P=0.08). Funnel plot showed no obvious publication bias (Figure 2) and Egger’s test also did not suggest significant publication bias (P=0.67).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Forest plot for the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk.

Table 2.

Summary of the meta-analysis results

OR (95% CI) P P heterogeneity
GG+GC vs. CC Overall 1.25 (1.10-1.43) 0.0008 0.85
GG+GC vs. CC Female 1.25 (1.07-1.46) 0.005 0.50
GG+GC vs. CC Hip 1.05 (0.89-1.24) 0.53 0.28
GG+GC vs. CC Wrist 1.25 (1.07-1.47) 0.006 0.22
GG+GC vs. CC Osteoporotic 1.60 (1.12-2.28) 0.009 0.56
GG+GC vs. CC Stress 1.25 (0.97-1.61) 0.08 0.45

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Funnel plot for the publication bias.

Discussion

Although some studies investigated the association between the IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk, the definite conclusion still cannot be addressed. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to estimate the relationships between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. The meta-analysis involved 6 articles and results from this meta-analysis suggested that the IL6 -174C/G polymorphism might be a risk factor for fracture, especially in women, wrist fracture, and osteoporotic fracture. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first meta-analysis of the association between the IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk.

The IL6 -174C/G polymorphism located in the promoter region of the IL-6 gene. The G allelewas reported to be associated with increased promoter activity and plasma IL-6 levels [14]. Lorentzon et al. found that this polymorphism was an independent predictor of bone mineral density (BMD) during late puberty and of peak bone mass in healthy white men [15]. Ferrari et al. suggested that the CC genotype was associated with lower bone resorption and lesser decrease in bone mass in older postmenopausal women [16].

Our meta-analysis had several strengths. First, it was the first meta-analysis which assessed the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. Second, we have followed the inclusion criteria strictly to reduce possible selection bias. Third, Egger’s test and funnel plot were used to assess publication bias. Fourth, the impact of different genetic background was minimized, because all included studies were performed with Caucasians.

Some limitations should also be addressed. First, the number of included studies was small. More studies are needed to further assess the association between IL6 -174C/G polymorphism and fracture risk. Second, lacking of the original data of included studies limited the evaluation of the effects of the gene-environment and gene-gene interactions in fracture development. Third, we cannot exclude the possibility of undetected bias.

This meta-analysis suggested that the IL6 -174C/G polymorphism may be associated with wrist and osteoporotic fracture risk. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to further validate our results.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1726–33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holmes J, House A. Psychiatric illness predicts poor outcome after surgery for hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. Psychol Med. 2000;30:921–9. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799002548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kanis JA, Johnell O. Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:229–38. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1811-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfeilschifter J, Köditz R, Pfohl M, Schatz H. Changes in proinflammatory cytokine activity after menopause. Endocr Rev. 2002;23:90–119. doi: 10.1210/edrv.23.1.0456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tamura T, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Miyaura C, Tanaka S, Yamada Y, Koishihara Y, Ohsugi Y, Kumaki K, Taga T. Soluble interleukin-6 receptor triggers osteoclast formation by interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:11924–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beeton CA, Chatfield D, Brooks RA, Rushton N. Circulating levels of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor in patients with head injury and fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:912–7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nguyen TV, Eisman JA. Genetic profiling and individualized assessment of fracture risk. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:153–61. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nordström A, Gerdhem P, Brändström H, Stiger F, Lerner UH, Lorentzon M, Obrant K, Nordström P, Akesson K. Interleukin-6 promoter polymorphism is associated with bone quality assessed by calcaneus ultrasound and previous fractures in a cohort of 75-year-old women. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:820–6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1610-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moffett SP, Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Stone KL, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, Hochberg MC, Joslyn G, Morin P, Cummings SR SOF Research Group. Association of the G-174C variant in the interleukin-6 promoter region with bone loss and fracture risk in older women. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1612–8. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dinçel E, Sepici-Dinçel A, Sepici V, Ozsoy H, Sepici B. Hip fracture risk and different gene polymorphisms in the Turkish population. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008;63:645–50. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322008000500013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Breuil V, Quincey D, Testa J, Roux CH, Albert C, Mroueh Z, Chami-Stemman H, Brocq O, Grisot C, Euller-Ziegler L, Carle GF. Gene polymorphisms and osteoporotic fractures: a study in postmenopausal French women. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76:317–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Korvala J, Hartikka H, Pihlajamäki H, Solovieva S, Ruohola JP, Sahi T, Barral S, Ott J, Ala-Kokko L, Männikkö M. Genetic predisposition for femoral neck stress fractures in military conscripts. BMC Genet. 2010;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yanovich R, Friedman E, Milgrom R, Oberman B, Freedman L, Moran DS. Candidate gene analysis in israeli soldiers with stress fractures. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11:147–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fishman D, Faulds G, Jeffery R, Mohamed-Ali V, Yudkin JS, Humphries S, Woo P. The effect of novel polymorphisms in the interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene on IL-6 transcription and plasma IL-6 levels, and an association with systemic-onset juvenile chronic arthritis. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1369–76. doi: 10.1172/JCI2629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lorentzon M, Lorentzon R, Nordström P. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism is related to bone mineral density during and after puberty in healthy white males: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1944–9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.10.1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrari SL, Garnero P, Emond S, Montgomery H, Humphries SE, Greenspan SL. A functional polymorphic variant in the interleukin-6 gene promoter associated with low bone resorption in postmenopausal women. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:196–201. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200101)44:1<196::AID-ANR26>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES